Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2010 Mar;24(2):136–144. doi: 10.1002/jbt.20322

The Induction of Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Supeoxide Anion, Myeloperoxidase, and Superoxide Dismutase in the Peritoneal Lavage Cells of Mice after Prolonged Exposure to Dichloroacetate and Trichloroacetate

Ezdihar A Hassoun 1,, Jessica Spildener 1, Jacquelyn Cearfoss 1
PMCID: PMC2875796  NIHMSID: NIHMS202161  PMID: 20391627

Abstract

The induction of phagocytic activation in response to prolonged treatment with different doses of dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA) has been investigated in mice. Groups of B6C3F1 male mice were administered 7.7, 77, 154 and 410 mg of DCA or TCA/ kg/day , post orally, for 4- and 13-weeks. Peritoneal lavage cells (PLCs) were isolated and assayed for the different biomarkers of phagocytyic activation, including superoxide anion (SA), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and myeloperoxidase (MPO). In addition, the role of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the SA production was also assessed. DCA and TCA produced significant and dose-dependent increases in SA and TNF-α production and in MPO activity but the increases in response to the high doses of the compounds (> 77 mg/kg/day) in the 13-week treatment period were less significant than those produced in the 4-week treatment period. Also, dose-dependent increases in SOD activity were observed in both periods of treatments. In general, the results demonstrate significant induction of the biomarkers of phagocytic activation by doses of DCA and TCA that were previously shown to be non carcinogenic, with significantly greater increases observed at the earlier period of exposure, as compared with later period. These findings may argue against the contribution of those mechanisms to the hepatotoxicity/hepatocarcinogenicity of the compounds and suggest them to be early adaptive/ protective mechanisms against their long term effects.

Keywords: Dichloroacetate, Trichloroacetate, Peritoneal lavage cells, Subacute, Subchronic, Superoxide anion, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha, Myeloperoxidase

Introduction

Dichloroacetate (DCA) and trichloroacetate (TCA) are among the by-products formed in the water during the process of water chlorination (13). They are also known to be formed as metabolites of trichloroethylene, a widely used industrial solvent and water contaminant (47). The concentrations of TCA and DCA in the municipal water supplies are in the range of 30–160 μg/l (2, 8), and those together with possible exposure to the compounds from other environmental sources, suggest risk potential from long term exposure.

Hepatotoxicity and hepatocarcinogenicity have been demonstrated as the most prominent effects of DCA and TCA in rodents, after long term exposure (912). Biomarkers of oxidative stress, such as production of lipid peroxidation, superoxide anion (SA) production and DNA damage were found to be induced in the hepatic tissues of mice exposed to single high doses of the compounds and have been suggested as possible mechanisms for the compounds’-induced hepatotoxicity and hepatocarcinogenicity (1318).

Activated phagocytic cells are known to be associated with the production of ROS, such as superoxide anion (O2·− ) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (1923), the release of the enzyme myeloperoxidase (MPO) (2426), and the production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (2729). While those products are known to play a major role in the host defense against bacterial infections and tumors, they are also known to mediate tissue damage under certain circumstances, especially during the processes of inflammation and ischemic injury (25, 3031).

DCA and TCA were found to induce dose- and time-dependent production of SA in the J744.A1 macrophage cells (3233). In vitro studies on the effects of the compounds in the J774A.1 macrophage cells have also assessed the protective effects of antioxidant enzymes and TNF antibodies against the compounds’-induced SA production (3334). Recent studies have demonstrated the production of phagocytic activation in the peritoneal lavage cells (PLCs) of B6C3F1 male mice, several hours after exposure to single high doses of DCA and TCA (18).

Based on the above mentioned in vivo acute studies, as well as in vitro studies indicating the induction of phagocytic activation by DCA and TCA, and in an attempt to correlate the induction of this mechanism with the long term hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity of the compounds, the study was designed to determine different biomarkers of phagocytic activation in the PLCs of B6C3F1 mice after 4 weeks (subacute) and 13 weeks (subchronic) exposure to doses of DCA and TCA that were previously found to range between the non hepatotoxic/hepatocarcinogenic and those producing maximal hepatotoxicity/hepatocarcinogenicity. The results of the study were presented in part, in the Society of Toxicology (SOT) meeting (35).

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

All of the chemicals, including sodium dichloroacetate (DCA) and sodium trichloroacetate (TCA) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO), and were of the highest grades available.

Animals and treatments

B6C3F1 male mice were used for this study, based on previous studies that found the animals to be sensitive to the acute, as well as the long term effects of DCA and TCA (918). The animals were about 6 weeks of age and weighing approximately 20 g when they received the first doses of the compounds. They were allowed to acclimate for 3 days prior to the experimental use, caged at 21° C with a 12 hr light/dark cycle, maintained on a standard laboratory chow from Harlan Teklad (Madison, Wisconsin), and allowed a free access to food and water. DCA and TCA were dissolved in distilled water, and pHs of the solutions were adjusted to 7.0 by sodium hydroxide solution. Groups of mice (7 animals/ group) were treated post orally, with daily doses of 7.7, 77, 154, and 410 mg/kg body weight of DCA or TCA, for 4 weeks (subacute treatment) and 13 weeks (subchronic treatment). These doses were based on previous studies that investigated the abilities of the compounds to induce hepatotoxic and hepatocarcinogenic effects in B6C3F1 male mice provided with drinking water containing the compounds at concentrations ranging between 0.05–5 g/l of the compounds for 60–75 weeks (9, 1112). DeAngelo et al. (11) have calculated the time-weighted mean daily doses that correspond to 0.05, 0.5, 3.5 and 5 g/l of DCA in the drinking water and found them to be equivalent to 7.6, 77, 410 and 486 mg/kg/day, respectively, and that concentrations equivalent to 7.6, 77, and 410 mg/kg/day are the doses that correspond to the non carcinogenic dose, the threshold carcinogenic dose and the dose that results in 100% tumor prevalence, respectively. Also, the dose-response of those studies has demonstrated a steep rise to a maximum tumor incidence at 2 g/l DCA, immediately after the threshold concentration of 0.5 g/l (11). Similarly, Bull et al (12) have indicated production of hepatoproliferative lesions (HPL) in male B6C3F1 mice exposed to drinking water containing 1 or 2 g/l DCA or TCA and found that the induction of HPL by TCA was linear with the dose, while that of DCA increased sharply with the increase from 1 to 2 g/l. Furthermore, Herren Freund et al. (9) have demonstrated DCA and TCA as complete carcinogens in B6C3F1 where hepatocellular carcinomas were produced in 81 or 32% of the animals exposed to drinking water containing 5 g/l of DCA or TCA, respectively. The studies also demonstrated increases in the incidence of animals with adenomas in response to those treatments. Control animals received distilled water at a rate of 5.0 ml/kg body weight/day, after adjusting its pH to 7.0 with sodium hydroxide solution. Animals were euthanized at the end of the treatment periods, using carbon dioxide anesthesia followed by cervical dislocation.

Collection of the peritoneal lavage cells (PLCs)

The PLCs were collected by injecting 3 ml of a buffer containing 140 mM NaCl, 5mM KCl, 10 mM glucose, 20 mM HEPES and 2 mM CaCl2, (pH 7.3), into the peritoneal cavities of the animal, immediately after sacrifice. The peritoneal cavities were massaged to release the cells, and fluids were withdrawn from the peritoneal cavities by a syringe. The PLCs suspensions were centrifuged at 1700 × g for 10 minutes and cell pellets were re-suspended in 2 ml of DMEM containing methionine and supplemented with glutamine, penicillin-streptomycin, Hepes buffer, MEM-NEAA, sodium pyruvate solution and fetal bovine serum (FBS). Aliquots of 200 μl of cellular suspensions were plated on 96-well plate, and were incubated and used for the determination of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) production as described below. The rest of the cellular suspensions were used for the determination of SA production and myeloperoxidase (MPO) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities.

Determination of TNF-alpha

Plates containing cellular suspensions were incubated for 24 h at 37° C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Media were then collected and assayed for TNF-α production using the Quantikine mouse TNF-α Immunoassay, which is a 4.5 h solid phase ELISA (R & D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The assay was conducted following the procedure indicated in the kit and plates were read in a microplate reader set to 450 nm. TNF-α levels were determined according to a standard curve prepared with serial dilutions of recombinant murine TNF-α standard provided with the kit.

Determination of superoxide anion (SA)

SA production was determined in the PLCs, using the cytochrome c reduction assay (21), with modifications. In brief, the 2 ml reaction mixture contained 50 μl of PLCs suspension and 0.05 mM cytochrome c oxidase in phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2. Reaction mixtures were incubated for 15 minutes at 37° C, after which reactions were terminated by placing the tubes on ice. The mixtures were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes and absorbances of the supernatant fractions were measured at 550 nm, using Spectronic 20 spectrophotometer. Absorbance values were converted to nmoles of cytochrome c reduced/min, using the extinction coefficient 2.1 × 104M−1 cm−1.

Determination of MPO activity

MPO activity was measured according to the method of Bradley et al. (26). Aliquots of 0.5 ml cellular suspensions were freeze-thawed 3 times and were then centrifuged at 4,000 g for 15 min and the resultant supernatant was assayed. The assay mixture contained 0.1 ml of supernatant mixed with 2.9 ml of 50 mM Phosphate buffer, pH 6.0, containing 0.167 mg/ml o-dianisidine dihydrochloride and 0.0005% hydrogen peroxide. The change in the absorbance was measured at 460 nm for 5 minutes, and absorbances were converted into units of MPO activity, where one unit is defined as that degrading one micromole of hydrogen peroxide per minute at 25° C. A molar extinction coefficient of 11300 for the oxidized o-dianisidine was used.

Determination of SOD activity

Aliquots of 0.5 ml cellular suspensions were centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 min and cell pellets were re-suspended in 2 ml sucrose buffer containing 0.32 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Tris-HCL. Cellular suspensions were freeze-thawed 3 times and were then centrifuged at 4,000 g for 15 min and the resultant supernatant was assayed for SOD activity according to the method of Marklund and Marklund (36). In brief, an aliquot of the supernatant (200 μl) was mixed with 750 μl Tris-cacodylic buffer , containing 50 mM Tris-HCL, 50 mM cacodylic acid and 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.2, followed by the addition of 250 μl of 2 mM pyrogallol. Absorbances of the mixtures were recorded at 420 nm immediately and then every 30 sec for 3 min, using a Spectronic 20 spectrophotometer. Changes in the rate of absorbances were calculated and converted into units of SOD activity, where one unit is equivalent to the quantity of SOD that is needed to produce 50% inhibition of pyrogallol autooxidation (36).

Determination of protein

The amounts of protein in the cellular suspensions were determined according to the method of Lowry (37), using bovine serum albumin as a standard, and data for SA, SOD, MPO and TNF-α, were expressed as nmoles/min, units, units and pg, respectively, /mg protein.

Statistical methods

Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel® data analysis tool package. Data are expressed as means of 7 samples (animals)/dose/compound/time point ± S.D. A one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the statistical differences between groups, with Scheffe’s S method used as a post hoc test. A significance level of p< 0.05 was employed.

Results

The effects of DCA and TCA on SA production in the PLCs are demonstrated in figures 1A and B, respectively. Dose-dependent increases in SA production were observed with DCA and TCA doses higher than 7.7 mg/kg/day in the 4-week treatment period. While both compounds produced significant increases in this biomarker at doses ranging between 7.7–154 mg/kg/day in the 13-week treatment period, the level of the biomarker declined at a dose of 154 mg/kg of either compound, as compared with the immediately lower dose and reached the corresponding control level at a dose of 410 mg DCA or TCA/kg/day.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A and B: SA production, determined as cytochrome c reduced/min/mg protein in the PLCs of the (A) DCA-treated mice, and (B) TCA-treated mice, 4 weeks (4-W) and 13 weeks (13-W) after exposure. Columns that do not share an identical superscript are significantly different (p< 0.05)

Figures 2A and B present the effects of DCA and TCA, respectively, on SOD activity. DCA and TCA resulted in significant and dose-dependent increases in SOD activity with doses ranging between 77–410 mg/kg/day of the 4-week treatment period, and with doses ranging between 7.7–410 mg/kg/day at the 13-week treatment period. The figures also indicate significantly greater increases in SOD activity in response to DCA and TCA at the 13-week period, as compared with the 4-week treatment period.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

A and B: SOD activity determined in the PLCs of the (A) DCA-treated mice, and (B) TCA-treated mice, 4 weeks (4-W) and 13 weeks (13-W) after exposure. Columns that do not share an identical superscript are significantly different (p< 0.05)

Figures 3A and B demonstrate the effects of DCA and TCA, respectively, on MPO activity. DCA and TCA resulted in significant increases in MPO activity when administered at doses ranging between 7.7–410 mg/kg/day in the 4-weeks treatment period, as compared with the corresponding control. While significant increases in MPO activity were also observed in response to DCA and TCA doses ranging between 7.7–154 mg/kg/day administered for 13 weeks, no significant changes in MPO activity were observed in response to 410 mg/kg/day of either compound when compared with the corresponding control at that period of treatment. Figure 3B also shows that the increases in response to 7.7–154 mg of TCA/kg/day at the 13 weeks period were significantly less than those produced in response to the same doses at the 4 weeks period.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A and B: Myeloperoxidase activity determined in the PLCs of the (A) DCA-treated mice, and (B) TCA-treated mice, 4 weeks (4-W) and 13 weeks (13-W) after exposure. Columns that do not share an identical superscript are significantly different (p< 0.05)

The effects of DCA and TCA on TNF-α production are demonstrated in figures 4A and B, respectively. Dose-dependent increases in TNF-α production were observed with DCA doses ranging from 77–410 and 7.7–154 mg/kg/day at the 4- and 13-week exposure periods, respectively (figure 4A). While TCA administration at doses ranging between 77–410 mg/kg/day resulted in dose-dependent increases in TNF-α production in the 4-weeks treatment period, significant production of this cytokine was only observed in response to 154 mg TCA/kg/day in the 13-weeks treatment period when compared with the corresponding control (figure 4B).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

A and B: Amount of TNF-α released by the PLCs of mice in response to (A) DCA and (B) TCA treatment for 4 weeks (4-W) and 13weeks (13-W). Columns that do not share an identical superscript are significantly different (p< 0.05)

Table 1 shows the results of comparisons between the effects of DCA and TCA on the different biomarkers. Data of the 7 samples for the effect of DCA on each biomarker, in response to each dose and at each time point were pooled and compared with the corresponding pooled data for the same biomarker, dose and time point for TCA, using one-way ANOVA. The p-values were calculated and a significance level of p<0.05 was employed. In general, DCA produced significantly greater effects than those of TCA on SA production at both time points, and on SOD, MPO and TNF-α, in response to a certain dose level at the 13-week treatment period. TCA on the other hand produced significantly greater effects than those of DCA on MPO activity and TNF-α production, at the 4-week treatment period.

Table 1.

Comparisons between the responses to DCA and TCA at each of the tested doses at the 4-weeks (4-W) and 13-weeks (13-W) treatment periods. Numbers indicate the calculated p-values for the differences between the effects of the two compounds on each biomarker, in response to each dose and each time of treatment, where p-values < 0.05 indicate a statistically significant difference.

mg/kg/day
7.7 77 154 410
Biomarker
SA (4-W) 0.9770 0.0004* 1.4 × 10−5* 8×10−6*
(13-W) 0.0002* 0.0005* 2.0 × 10−6* 0.0320*
SOD (4-W) 0.5330 0.1900 0.7200 0.0002*
(13-W) 0.9500 0.0015* 0.0410* 0.5700
MPO (4-W) 0.0250** 0.0020** 0.0036** 0.1800
(13-W) 5.8 × 10−5* 0.2500 1.1 × 10−6* 0.2100
TNF (4-W) 0.7200 0.0105* 0.0102* 0.0007*
(13-W) 0.0002* 4 × 10−12* 8.1 × 10−11* 0.3000
*

DCA effect is greater than TCA effect

**

TCA effect is greater than DCA effect.

Discussion

The results of this study indicate the induction of phagocytic activation in response to subacute and subchronic administration of DCA and TCA to mice, as assessed by three important biomarkers of phagocytic activation that included SA and TNF-α production and MPO activity. Phagocytic activation is known as a defense mechanism against bacterial infections, but it can be associated with the destruction of normal or neoplastic cells (30, 2223, 27, 3839). Since hepatotoxicity and hepatocarcinogenicity are the most prominent injuries produced by DCA and TCA in B6C3F1 male mice after long term exposure (9, 1112), it is most likely that phagocytic activation occurs in response to those injuries. DCA and TCA induced significant SA production in response to subacute and subchronic treatment with 77–410 mg/kg/day and 7.7–154 mg/kg/day, respectively. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is not a biomarker of phagocytic activation, but is an antioxidant enzyme responsible for SA dismutation and its conversion to H2O2 (40), and was determined for this study to better understand the profile of SA production in response to the compounds. TCA and DCA administration to the mice resulted in dose-dependent increases in SOD activity in the two tested treatment periods. This may indicate possible up-regulation of the enzyme to protect against SA overproduction and may also suggest possible role for H2O2 in the observed effects. Significantly greater increases in SOD activity were observed in response to different doses of the compounds in the 13-week, as compared with the 4-week treatment period which may account for the significantly less SA production, especially in response to subchronic treatment with 154–410 mg/kg/day of DCA or TCA, when compared with the corresponding subacute treatment. Despite the significantly greater increase in SOD activity in response to some of the DCA doses when compared with TCA during the two periods of treatment, DCA resulted in significantly greater increases in SA production at both periods, as compared with TCA. These findings are inline with those of previous studies testing the effects of single acute doses of DCA and TCA on the production of SA by the PLCs (16), and SA and other biomarkers of oxidative stress in the hepatic tissues of mice (16, 18), as well as of studies comparing the effects of various concentrations of the compounds on SA production by the macrophage cells in culture (3233).

MPO has been shown to act as immunoregulator, both in vivo and in vitro, inducing the release of ROS, TNF-α and interferon alpha/beta (4142), and the results of the study clearly demonstrate parallel increases in MPO activity and SA and TNF-α production, in response to different doses of the compounds, at both periods of treatment. Reaction of MPO with H2O2 in the presence of physiological concentrations of Cl results in the formation of the powerful oxidant hypochlorous acid/hypochlorite (HOCl/OCl ) (24, 26, 4344), and components of the peroxidase-H2O2-halide system, including MPO have been shown to contribute to the killing of certain mammalian tumor cells (45). The results of the study indicate less significant increases in MPO activity in response to DCA and TCA doses ranging between 154–410 and 7.7–410 mg/kg/day, respectively, in the 13-week treatment period when compared with the corresponding doses at the 4-week exposure period. The decline in this biomarker in the later period of treatment as compared with the earlier period may suggest an initial and early protective role for MPO against DCA- and TCA-induced injuries.

TCA-induced increases in MPO activity and TNF-α were significantly greater than those induced by DCA in the 4-week treatment period. On the other hand, DCA-induced increases in those biomarkers were significantly greater than those induced by TCA in the in the 13-week treatment period. Studies involved monitoring H2O2 uptake by MPO have shown that when the concentration of this species is increased to a certain level it causes inhibition of MPO activity, but Cl decreases H2O2 effects on the enzyme (44). Also, Kettle and Winterbourn (43) have proposed the contribution of SA generation by the neutrophils to the prevention of H2O2 and other one-electron donors from inhibiting MPO. Furthermore, TCA undergoes a one-electron reduction and hemolytic cleavage during the process of metabolism, giving rise to DCA and Cl, and DCA can also generate Cl through a similar process, giving rise to monochloroacetic acid (16). Although this can lead to the conclusion that the changes seen in MPO activity were associated with the net effect of variable concentrations of Cl generated during the process of metabolism of the compounds, SA produced in response to the compounds and the concentration of H2O2 formed in response to SA dismutation by SOD, it is difficult to assess the exact contribution of each species to those changes at this point.

Lefkowitz et al, (42) have demonstrated the role of MPO in the in vitro release of TNF by the mouse peritoneal macrophages, and also in the in vivo release of the cytokine in the sera of mice, and they suggested radical production by MPO or binding of MPO to the mannosyl-fucosyl receptor as possible mechanisms for the TNF release. This finding supports the results of this study showing similarities in the profiles of MPO and TNF-α in response to different doses of DCA and TCA, as well as the profile for the differences between the two compounds’ effects on the two biomarkers, in the two treatment periods.

Wang and Lin (46) have described TNF as a “double-dealer”, where it can act as an endogenous tumor promoter or a cancer killer, depending on the cross talk between the two signals it initiates: the nuclear factor-κB, which is a major cell survival signal that is anti-apoptotic, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase that is considered as a cell death signal. Less significant increases in TNF-α production were observed with DCA and TCA doses ranging between 154–410 and 77–410 mg/kg/day, respectively, in the 13-week exposure period when compared with the corresponding doses of the compounds in the 4-week period. Those observations are inline with those of MPO and may also suggest an initial contribution of the cytokine release to the protection against injury, rather than to toxicity production by the compounds. i.e., have those biomarkers contributed to the toxicity rather than to the protection against injury, significantly greater increases would have been observed with the higher doses and the longer period of treatment.

Studies on the tumorgenesis by DCA and TCA have suggested two different mechanisms for the compounds, with DCA effect depends on the stimulation of cell division secondary to hepatotoxic damage, and TCA effect is associated with the production of free radicals and the induction of DNA repair synthesis (12, 47). Studies on the mechanism of tumorgenicity by the compounds(12) have also indicated production of hepatoproliferative lesions (HPL) in the livers of mice after 52 weeks of treatment with the compounds, and that suspension of the treatment at 37 week of treatment would result in similar number of HPL lesions in response to DCA treatment for 52 weeks, but of significantly lower number of lesions in response to TCA treatment for 52 weeks, indicating possible reversibility of the damage. In another study, it has been indicated that lower doses of DCA may also involve damage to DNA (47), and that will also indicate possible repair and reversibility in response to those doses. These may all support our suggestion that lower doses and earlier periods of treatment are associated with some protective/ adaptive mechanisms, and phagocytic activation could also contribute to those mechanisms.

Previous studies in our lab have demonstrated the induction of phagocytic activation and the production of oxidative stress in the hepatic tissues of B6C3F1 mice, several hours after the administration of single high doses on DCA and TCA and suggested the contribution of phagocytic activation to the induction of oxidative stress in the hepatic tissues (18). That suggestion contradicts the conclusion made in this study about the possible protective role of phagocytic activation against DCA- and TCA-induced cellular injuries. The reasons for the those contradictions include, the current detailed studies that involved studying various markers of phagocytic activation, compared to SA production as the only marker used to assess the role of that mechanism in the previous studies (18). Also, no assessment was made for the role of SOD in SA production in the previous studies. Furthermore, the current studies have determined the effects of a wide range of doses and after two prolonged periods of treatment, compared with the effects of brief exposure to single doses of the compounds that were determined in the previous one. The results of this study also differ from those of in vitro studies showing an association between SA production and cellular death induced by DCA and TCA on macrophage cell culture. These differences are clearly related to the toxicokinetic of the compounds in an in vivo, as compared with an in vitro system (3234)

In conclusion, and contrary to the expected dose- and time-dependent increases in the biomarkers of phagocytic activation that had been primarily proposed to contribute to the hepatotoxicity/hepatocarcinogenicity of the compounds, the results generally indicated more increases in those biomarkers in the 4-weeks treatment period than the 13-weeks period, and also in response to the lower doses than the carcinogenic ones during that period. These observations may indicate that the compounds’-induced phagocytic activation does not contribute to their hepatotoxicity/hepatocarcinogencity, but instead is suggested as an initial and early mechanism induced to adapt to, and/ or protect against the compounds’-induced primary injuries, but was then overwhelmed and started to decline in response to the higher doses and/ or the longer periods of treatment . Studies on the compounds’ induced hepatotoxicity and oxidative stress in the livers of mice treated with similar doses and periods of treatments are underway in our laboratory to assess that.

Acknowledgments

The project described was supported by Grant Number R15ES013706 from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

References

  • 1.Krasner SW, McGuire MJ, Jacagelo JG, Patania NL, Reagan KM, Aieta EM. The occurrence of disinfection by-products in U.S. drinking water. J Amer Water Works Assoc. 1989;81:41–53. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Uden PC, Miller JW. Chlorinated acids and chloral in drinking water. J Am Water Works Assoc. 1983;75:524–526. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miller JW, Uden PC. Characterization of non volatile aqueous chlorination products of humic substances. Environ Sci Technol. 1983;17:150–157. doi: 10.1021/es00109a006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coleman WE, Lingg RD, Melton RG, Kopfler FC. The occurrence of volatile organics in five drinking water supplies using gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. In: Keith LH, editor. Identification and analysis of organic Pollutants of Water. Ann Arbor, MI: Ann Arbor Science Pub; 1976. pp. 305–327. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hathway DE. Consideration of evidence of mechanism of 1,1,2-trichloroethylene metabolism, including new identification of its dichloroacetic acid and trichloroacetic acid metabolites in mice. Cancer Lett. 1980;8:263–269. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(80)90012-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Green T, Prout MS. Species differences in response to trichloroethylene. II Biotransformation in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1985;79:401–411. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(85)90138-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Decant W, Metzler M, Henschler D. Novel metabolites of trichloroethylene through dechlorination reactions in mice and humans. Biochem Pharmacol. 1984;33:2021–2027. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(84)90568-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jolly RL. Basic issues in water chlorination: A chemical perspective. In: Jolly RL, Bull RJ, Davies WP, Katz S, Roberts MH Jr, Jacobs VA, editors. Water chlorination. Vol. 5. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Pub., Inc; 1985. pp. 19–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Herren-Freund SL, Pereira MA, Khoury MD, Olson G. The carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene and its metabolites, trichloroacetic acid and dichloroacetic acid, in mouse liver. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1987;90:183–189. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(87)90325-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Daniel FB, DeAngelo AB, Stober JA, Olson GR, Page NP. Hepatocarcinogenicity of chloral hydrate, 2-chloroaldehyde and dichloroacetic acid in the male B6C3F1 mouse. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1992;19:159–168. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(92)90147-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.DeAngelo AB, Daniel FB, Stober JA, Olson GR. The carcinogenicity of dichloroacetic acid in the male B6C3F1 mouse. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1991;16:337–347. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(91)90118-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bull RJ, Sanchez IM, Nelson MA, Larson JL, Lansing AJ. Liver tumor induction in B6C3F1 mice by dichloroacetate and dichloroacetate. Toxicology. 1990;63:341–359. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(90)90195-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nelson MA, Lansing AJ, Sanchez IM, Bull RJ, Springer DL. Dichloroacetic acid-and Trichloroacetic acid-induced DNA single strand breaks are independent of peroxisome proliferation. Toxicology. 1989;58:239–248. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(89)90139-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Parrish JM, Austin EW, Stevens DK, Kinder DH, Bull RJ. Haloacetate-induced oxidative damage to DNA in the liver of male B6C3F1 mice. Toxicology. 1996;110:103–111. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(96)03342-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Austin EW, Parrish JM, Kinder DH, Bull RJ. Lipid peroxidation and formation of 8-hydroxyguanosine from acute doses of halogenated acetic acids. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1996;31:77–82. doi: 10.1006/faat.1996.0078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Larson JL, Bull RJ. Metabolism and lipoperoxidative activity of trichloroacetate and dichloroacetate in rats and mice. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1992;115:268–277. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(92)90332-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nelson MA, Bull RJ. Induction of strand breaks in DNA by trichloroethylene and metabolites in rat liver in vivo. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1988;94:45–54. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(88)90335-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hassoun EA, Dey S. Dichloroacetate- and trichloroacetate-induced phagocytic activation and production of oxidative stress in the hepatic tissues of mice after acute exposure. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2008;22:27–34. doi: 10.1002/jbt.20210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Briggs RT, Robinson JM, Karnovsky MJ. Superoxide production by polymorphonuclear leukocytes. A cytochemical approach. Histochemistry. 1986;84:371–378. doi: 10.1007/BF00482965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Karnovsky ML, Badwey JA, Lochner J, Horn W, Heyworth PG. Trigger phenomena for the release of oxygen radicals by phagocytic leukocytes. In: Cerutti PA, Fridovich I, McCord JM, editors. Oxy Radicals in Molecular Biology and Pathology. New York: Alan R. Liss; 1988. pp. 61–81. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Babior BM, Kipnes RS, Curnutte JT. Biological defense mechanism. The production by leukocytes of superoxide, a potential bactericidal agent. J Clin Invest. 1973;52:741–744. doi: 10.1172/JCI107236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fantone JC, Ward PA. Role of oxygen-derived free radicals and metabolites in leukocyte-depedent inflammatory reactions. Am J Pathol. 1982;107:395–4018. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rossi F. The O−2-forming NADPH oxidase of the phagocytes: nature, mechanisms of activation and function. Biochim Biophy Acta. 1986;853:65–89. doi: 10.1016/0304-4173(86)90005-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Josephy PD. The respiratory burst. In: Josephy PD, editor. Molecular Toxicology. New York, New York: Oxford University press Inc; 1996. pp. 90–96. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Klebanoff SJ. Myeloperoxidase: friend and foe. 2005;77:598–625. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1204697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bradley PP, Priebat DA, Christensen RD, Rothstein G. Measurement of cutaneous inflammation: Estimation of neutrophil content with an enzyme marker. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 1982;78:206–209. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12506462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Roppolee DA, Werb Z. Secretory products of phagocytes. Curr Opin Immunol. 1988;1:47–52. doi: 10.1016/0952-7915(88)90050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tachibana K, Chen G, Huang DS, Scuderi P, Watson RR. Production of tumor necrosis factor α by resident and activated murine macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 1992;51:251–255. doi: 10.1002/jlb.51.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xing Z, Kirpalani H, Torry D, Jordana M, Gauldi J. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes as a significant source of tumor necrosis factor-α in endotoxin-challenged lung tissue. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:1009–1015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Smith J. Neutrophils host defence and inflammation: a double-edged sword. J Leukoc Biol. 1994;56:672–686. doi: 10.1002/jlb.56.6.672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kroencke KD, Kolb-Bachofen V, Berschick B, Burkart V, Kolb H. Activated macrophages kill pancreatic syngeneic islet cells via arginine-dependent nitric oxide generation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;175:752–758. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(91)91630-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hassoun E, Ray S. The induction of oxidative stress and cellular death by the drinking water disinfection by-products, dichloroacetate and trichloroacetate in J774. A1 cells. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C. 2003;135:119–128. doi: 10.1016/s1532-0456(03)00082-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hassoun EA, Kini V. Effects of superoxide dismutase and polyclonal tumor necrosis factor-alpha antibodies on chloroacetate-induced cellular death and superoxide anion production by J774.A1 macrophages. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part C. 2004;138:113–120. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2004.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hassoun EA, Mehta J. Dichloroacetate-induced modulation of cellular antioxidant enzyme activities and glutathione level in the J774A.1 cells. J Appl Toxicol. 2008;28:931–937. doi: 10.1002/jat.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hassoun E, Cearfoss J, Spildener J. The roles of oxidative stress and phagocytic activation in the subacute toxicity of the water chlorination by products, di- and tri-chloroacetate. The Toxicologist. 2009;108:66. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.DeAngelo AB, Daniel FB, McMillan L, Wernsing P, Savage RE., Jr Species and Strain Sensitivity to the induction of peroxisome proliferartion by Chloroacetic acids. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1989;101:285–298. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(89)90277-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marklund S, Marklund G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autooxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem. 1974;47:469–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr WL, Randall RJ. Protein measurements with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193:265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Klebanoff SJ. Myeloperoxidase-halide-hydrogen peroxide antibacterial system. J Bacteriol. 1985;95:2131–2138. doi: 10.1128/jb.95.6.2131-2138.1968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Weiss SJ, LoBuglio AF. Phagocyte-generated oxygen metabolites and cellular injury. Lab Invest. 1982;47:5–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Davies KJA. Oxidative stress: the paradox of aerobic life. In: Rice-Evans C, Halliwell B, Lunt GG, editors. Free radical and oxidative stress: Environment, Drugs and Food Additives. Portland Press; 1995. pp. 3–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lefkowitz DL, Mills KC, Moguilevsky N, Bollen A, Lefkowitz SS. Regulation of macrophage function by human recombinant myeloperoxidase. Immunol lett. 1993;36:43–49. doi: 10.1016/0165-2478(93)90067-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lefkowitz DL, Mills K, Morgan D, Lefkowitz SS. Macrophage activation and immunomodulation by myelopweoxidase. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1992;199:204–210. doi: 10.3181/00379727-199-43348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kettle AJ, Winterbourn CC. Superoxide modulates the activity of myeloperoxidase and optimizes the production of hypochlorous acid. Biochem J. 1988;252:529–536. doi: 10.1042/bj2520529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kettle AJ, Winterbourn CC. Influence of superoxide on myeloperoxidase kinetics measured with a hydrogen peroxide electrode. Biocem J. 1989;263:823–828. doi: 10.1042/bj2630823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Clark RA, Klebanoff SJ, Einstein AB, Fefer A. Peroxidase-H2O2-halide system: cytotoxic effect on mammalian tumor cells. Blood. 1975;45:161–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang X, Lin Y. Tumor necrosis factor and cancer, buddies or foes? Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2008;29:1275–1288. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2008.00889.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sanchez IM, Bull RJ. Early induction of reparative hyperplasia in the liver of B6C3F1 mice treated with dichloroacetate and trichloroacetate. Toxicology. 1990;64:33–46. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(90)90097-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES