Skip to main content
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene logoLink to The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
. 2010 Jun;82(6):1118–1120. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0460

High Frequency of Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Patients with and without Diarrhea in Lima, Perú

Coralith Garcia 1,*, Omayra Chincha 1, Mey Leon 1, David Iglesias 1, Francesca Barletta 1, Erik Mercado 1, Theresa Ochoa 1
PMCID: PMC2877421  PMID: 20519610

Abstract

Diarrhea is still a prevalent health issue in HIV patients. Our objective was to characterize the different diarrheagenic E. coli (DEC) groups in stools from adult HIV patients. Cross sectional study: We enrolled HIV-positive and -negative patients with and without diarrhea from a tertiary-care center of Lima, Peru. Clinical data was recorded and a stool sample per patient was cultured. Multiplex PCR was used to detect different DECs. One hundred eighty-four participants were enrolled. The frequency of having at least one DEC was more common in HIV-positive than HIV-negative patients with diarrhea (42% versus 20%, P < 0.05). The enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) was the most common DEC in patients with diarrhea, 13% in HIV patients. The diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC) was only present in HIV positive patients with diarrhea (10.1%). Different types of DEC are frequent in stools from HIV-positive patients.


Since the highly active anti-retroviral treatment (HAART) was introduced for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), the incidence of opportunistic infections has decreased and new pathogens, such as diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) groups,1 are now associated with diarrhea in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients. Because antibiotic therapy may be successful in cases where pathogenic bacteria are identified, studies focusing on bacterial diarrhea in AIDS patients are needed. The DECs have been classified into six groups based on specific genes that determine their virulence factors: enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), Shiga toxin producing E. coli (STEC), enteroagregative E. coli (EAEC), enteropathogen E. coli (EPEC), and diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC).2 The role of different DECs in causing diarrhea in HIV-infected people in Latin American countries has not been adequately addressed because most studies have not examined for all currently recognized groups of DECs. Our objective was to characterize the different DECs in stools from adult HIV patients in Lima, Perú.

Methods

This was a descriptive, cross-sectional study. We enrolled HIV-positive (HIV+) patients older than 18 years of age with diarrhea (D+) and without (D) at the HIV clinic of Hospital Cayetano Heredia, a referral center in Lima, Perú, during the period 2007–2008. We also enrolled adult HIV-negative (HIV) or unknown HIV status with diarrhea who attended the emergency room and HIV patients without gastrointestinal complaints. Because HIV prevalence in the general population of Perú is low (~0.5%), we analyzed HIVD+ and HIV-unknown status D+ in the same group. The HIV status was determined by the review of patient's charts or by performing an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. Patients who received antibiotics (other than trimethoprim-sulfametoxazole) during the previous 7-day period were not included. Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia and the Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia. Patients were interviewed for clinical data including sex, age, weight, height, gastrointestinal symptoms, and HIV status. The CD4 count and the use of HAART were recorded from patients' charts. Diarrhea was defined as ≥ 3 loose or watery stools in a 24-h period. Participants without diarrhea were enrolled if no gastrointestinal symptoms were present during the previous month. One stool sample per patient was cultured. Five E. coli colonies were isolated from MacConkey agar plates and analyzed by a multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method using primers for each type: EAEC (aggR), ETEC (lt, st), EPEC (eaeA), STEC (stx1, stx2), EIEC (ipaH) and DAEC (daaD) as previously described.3,4 This PCR has a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 100%3 and has been previously validated in our laboratory.4 Stools were also analyzed for the detection of Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, and Vibrio species. The stool was not analyzed for enteric viruses.

Results

One hundred eighty-four (184) individuals were enrolled over a period of 2 years (2007–2008); 69 HIV+D+, 45 HIV+D, 40 HIVD+ (10 HIV, and 30 HIV-unknown status [presumably negative]), and 30 HIVD. Mean age was 35.6 years (SD ± 11.4). There were no significant differences in age, sex, and body mass index between HIV+ and HIV patients. Episodes of diarrhea with duration of more than 1 week were more frequent in HIV+ than HIV patients (60.8% versus 10%, P < 0.05). Among HIV+ patients, those with diarrhea were less likely to be receiving HAART: 39.1% and 60% in HIV+ D+ and HIV+D, respectively.

The frequency of having at least one DEC was more common in HIV+D+ (42.0%) than in HIVD+ (20%) (P < 0.05) (Table 1). Other bacteria than DEC were found in 1.4% of HIV+D+ patients (one Salmonella sp. and one Shigella flexneri). No bacteria other than DECs were found in the HIVD+ group. The frequency of having at least one DEC tended to be higher in HIV+D+ than HIV+D (42.0% versus 26.7%). The ETEC was the most common DEC in patients with diarrhea (13% in HIV+ and 12.5% in HIV patients). The EAEC was more frequent in HIV+ D than in HIV+ D+ patients (11.1% versus 7.2%). The DAEC was only present in HIV+D+ patients (10.1%) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and diarrheagenic Escherichia coli isolated from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and -negative patients with and without diarrhea*

DEC type HIV-positiven HIV-negative
With diarrhea Without diarrhea With diarrhea Without diarrhea
Patients, no. 69 45 40 30
Age in years, mean (SD) 34.0 (8.5) 36.5 (9.9) 36.9 (15.7) 36.3 (12.8)
Male sex, no. (%) 54 (78.3) 28 (62.2) 25 (62.5) 18 (60–0)
+BMI, mean (SD) 21.2 (3.7) 23.3 (4.2) 23.3 (4.2) 24.2 (4.2)
Diarrhea episode more than 7 days, no. (%) 42 (60.9) 0 4 (10.0) 0
At least one DEC, no. (%) 29 (42.0) 12 (26.7) 8 (20.0) 2 (6.7)
ETEC, no. (%) 9 (13.0) 3 (6.7) 5 (12.5) 0
DAEC, no. (%) 7 (10.1) 0 0 0
EPEC, no. (%) 6 (8.7) 4 (8.9) 2 (5.0) 0
EAEC, no. (%) 5 (7.2) 5 (11.1) 0 2 (6.7)
STEC, no. (%) 1 (1.4) 0 0 0
EIEC, no. (%) 0 0 1 (2.5) 0
DAEC + ETEC, no. (%) 1 (1.4) 0 0 0
*

DEC = diarrheagenic E. coli; ETEC = enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC = diffusely adherent E. coli; EPEC = enteropathogen E. coli; EAEC = enteroagregative E. coli; STEC = Shiga toxin producing E. coli; EIEC = enteroinvasive E. coli.

Ten patients had HIV-negative status, 30 had unknown HIV status.

+BMI: body mass index *P < 0.05 for the comparison between HIV+D+ and HIVD+.

Ninety of 114 HIV+ patients had a CD4 count measured between 90 days before and after the stool sample was taken. There were no statistical differences in the frequency of DECs between those who had ≥ 200 and < 200 cells/mm3 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Distribution of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) isolated among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients based on CD4 count*

DEC type CD4 count ≤ 200 CD4 count > 200
With diarrhea N = 45 n (%) Without diarrhea N = 15 n (%) With diarrhea N = 11 n (%) Without diarrhea N = 19 n (%)
At least one DEC 18 (40.0) 4 (26.7) 6 (54.5) 7 (36.8)
ETEC 5 (11.1) 0 1 (9.1) 3 (15.8)
DAEC 5 (11.1) 0 2 (18.2) 0
EPEC 3 (6.7) 1 (6.7) 3 (27.3) 2 (10.5)
EAEC 4 (8.8) 3 (20.0) 0 2 (10.5)
STEC 1 (2.2) 0 0 0
*

ETEC = enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC = diffusely adherent E. coli; EPEC = enteropathogen E. coli; EAEC = enteroagregative E. coli; STEC = Shiga toxin producing E. coli.

In the HIV+D+ group, 36/69 (52.2%) had persistent diarrhea (14 days or more) when they were enrolled. The frequency of having at least one DEC was higher in patients who had persistent diarrhea (50% versus 33%) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Frecuency of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients based on diarrheal episode duration*

DEC type HIV-positive
Diarrhea < 14 days N = 33 n (%) Diarrhea ≥ 14 days N = 36 n (%)
At least one DEC 10 (30.3) 18 (50.0)
ETEC 3 (9.1) 6 (16.7)
DAEC 2 (6.1) 5 (13.9)
EPEC 3 (9.1) 3 (8.3)
EAEC 2 (6.1) 3 (8.3)
EAEC + ETEC 0 1 (2.7)
*

ETEC = enterotoxigenic E. coli; DAEC = diffusely adherent E. coli; EPEC = enteropathogen E. coli; EAEC = enteroagregative E. coli.

Discussion

We found a high frequency of DEC in HIV+D+ patients but also in HIV+D individuals using a high sensitivity and specificity method for E. coli pathotypes detection.3 Colonization with enteric pathogens is common in other populations, such as children from developing countries.5,6 A complex relationship between factors related to the host (cell immunosuppresion), the bacterial agent, and the environment (high frequency of exposure to enteric pathogens caused by fecal contamination of water and food) may be responsible for the enteric pathogen colonization in HIV individuals from developing countries.

The ETEC is a well-recognized diarrheal agent among children in the developing world and in travelers,7,8 but has not been frequently studied in HIV populations. In this study, ETEC was the most frequent DEC in HIV+D+ and HIVD+ (~13%), but was also found in HIV+D patients. In a previous study in Lima, Cárcamo and others9 found ETEC in 4% of AIDS patients with diarrhea (but using a different technique).

The EAEC is also related to diarrheal diseases in small children and is a leading pathogen in travelers' diarrhea.8,10 Previous studies have shown a strong correlation between EAEC and AIDS patients with diarrhea.1 We found EAEC in HIV+D+ but we also found a higher frequency of EAEC in patients without diarrhea. This rate of EAEC colonization in HIV+ patients could be related to the factors described previously.

The role of DAEC in HIV-associated diarrhea has not been adequately studied. Of interest, in this study we found DAEC only in the group of HIV patients with diarrhea. There are very few studies that have looked at the prevalence of DAEC in HIV patients, therefore it is important to replicate this study to confirm this unique finding. The role of DAEC in diarrheal disease has been controversial because some studies reported similar frequency of isolation from diarrhea and control samples. However, other case-control studies have found a correlation between DAEC infection and diarrhea, especially in children > 12 months of age.11,12 In a recent diarrhea cohort study in infants from peri-urban communities of Lima we found that although DAEC accounted for only 5% of the cases, it was significantly associated with diarrhea in infants 6–12 months of age.13 The DAEC strains are identified on the basis of their diffuse adherence pattern on cultured epithelial cells. One of the adherence factors of DAEC is the surface fimbriae that are responsible for the diffuse adherence phenotype in a prototype strain. These fimbriae are homologous with members of the Afa/Dr family of adhesins,14 which are identified by hybridization to specific probes, daaC or daaD, common to operons encoding Afa/Dr adhesions. The gene used in our multiplex PCR (daaD) is for an initial screening of DAED strains. Other virulence markers may be worth studying to further define more virulent strains.

The main limitation of this study is the small number of patients included in each subgroup and that the HIV status was undocumented in some control patients. Furthermore, the duration of diarrhea episodes were different in both groups being longer in HIV+ patients. We conclude that different types of DEC are frequent in stools from HIV+ patients with and without diarrhea regardless of the duration of diarrheal episode and immunity status. Further studies with a higher number of participants should be done to evaluate the role of the different DEC pathotypes in AIDS patients from Latin America.

Acknowledgments

We thank Victoria Espejo, Carmen Contreras, and David Durand for their support with the laboratory analyses; Esmelda Montalban and Jorge Alave for recruiting patients; and Thomas Cleary and Natalie Gulliver, for reviewing and editing this manuscript.

Footnotes

Financial support: This study was supported by Fondo Concursable 2006 – Univesidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia.

Authors' addresses: Coralith Garcia, David Iglesias, Francesca Barletta, Erik Mercado, and Theresa Ochoa, Instituto de Medicina Tropical Alexander von Humboldt, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Av. Honorio Delgado 430, San Martin de Porres, Lima 31, Peru, E-mail: 03345@upch.edu.pe. Omayra Chincha and Mey Leon, Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia, Av. Honorio Delgado s/n San Martin de Porres, Lima 31, Peru.

References

  • 1.Gassama-Sow A, Sow PS, Gueye M, Gueye-Ndiaye A, Parret JL, Mboup S, Aidara-Kane A. Characterization of pathogenic Escherichia coli in human immunodeficiency virus-related diarrhea in Senegal. J Infect Dis. 2004;189:75–78. doi: 10.1086/380489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nataro JP, Kaper JB. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11:142–201. doi: 10.1128/cmr.11.1.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Guion CE, Ochoa TJ, Walker CM, Barletta F, Cleary TG. Detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli by use of melting-curve analysis and real-time multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1752–1757. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02341-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Barletta F, Ochoa TJ, Ecker L, Gil AI, Lanata CF, Cleary TG. Validation of five-colony pool analysis using multiplex real-time PCR for detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1915–1917. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00608-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Porat N, Levy A, Fraser D, Deckelbaum RJ, Dagan R. Prevalence of intestinal infections caused by diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in Bedouin infants and young children in Southern Israel. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:482–488. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199806000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Quiroga M, Oviedo P, Chinen I, Pegels E, Husulak E, Binztein N, Rivas M, Schiavoni L, Vergara M. Asymptomatic infections by diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in children from Misiones, Argentina, during the first twenty months of their lives. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2000;42:9–15. doi: 10.1590/s0036-46652000000100002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cama RI, Parashar UD, Taylor DN, Hickey T, Figueroa D, Ortega YR, Romero S, Perez J, Sterling CR, Gentsch JR, Gilman RH, Glass RI. Enteropathogens and other factors associated with severe disease in children with acute watery diarrhea in Lima, Peru. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:1139–1144. doi: 10.1086/314701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor DN, Bourgeois AL, Ericsson CD, Steffen R, Jiang ZD, Halpern J, Haake R, Dupont HL. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of rifaximin compared with placebo and with ciprofloxacin in the treatment of travelers' diarrhea. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:1060–1066. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cárcamo C, Hooton T, Wener MH, Weiss NS, Gilman R, Arevalo J, Carrasco J, Seas C, Caballero M, Holmes KK. Etiologies and manifestations of persistent diarrhea in adults with HIV-1 infection: a case-control study in Lima, Peru. J Infect Dis. 2005;191:11–19. doi: 10.1086/426508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Huang DB, Mohanty A, DuPont HL, Okhuysen PC, Chiang T. A review of an emerging enteric pathogen enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55:1303–1311. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.46674-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Spano LC, Sadovsky AD, Segui PN, Saick KW, Kitagawa SM, Pereira FE, Fagundes-Neto U, Scaletsky IC. Age-specific prevalence of diffusely adherent Escherichia coli in Brazilian children with acute diarrhoea. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:359–363. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47660-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Scaletsky IC, Fabbricotti SH, Carvalho RL, Nunes CR, Maranhão HS, Morais MB, Fagundes-Neto U. Diffusely adherent Escherichia coli as a cause of acute diarrhea in young children in Northeast Brazil: a case-control study. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:645–648. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.645-648.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ochoa TJ, Ecker L, Barletta F, Mispireta M, Gil AI, Contreras C, Molina M, Amemiya I, Verastegui H, Hall ER, Cleary TG, Lanata CF. Age-related susceptibility to infection with diarrheagenic E. coli in infants from peri-urban areas of Lima, Peru. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1694–1702. doi: 10.1086/648069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Le Bouguénec C, Servin AL. Diffusely adherent Escherichia coli strains expressing Afa/Dr adhesins (Afa/Dr DAEC): hitherto unrecognized pathogens. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2006;256:185–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00144.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene are provided here courtesy of The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

RESOURCES