Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2009 Nov 5;49(3):2163–2177. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.080

Figure 6. Individual Best Matching Scores As a Reproducibility Measure.

Figure 6

This figure depicts the individual reproducibility measurements for each group-level component (IC). All individual best matching scores are depicted as an error bar graph for each group-level component. Two template strategies were adopted for calculating the individual best matching scores: individual dual-regression derived templates (red) and group-level temporal concatenation group ICA (TC-GICA) derived templates (blue). Meanwhile, for each group-level IC, the consistency of matched results between the two template strategies is calculated as the spatial correlation coefficient (black) between individual dual-regression matched results and individual TC-GICA matched results. The numbers below these black points (i.e., around the line y = 0) represent the number of disagreements between the two template matching strategies.