Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2010 Jun 1;54(2):180–184. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181c98fc0

HIV-1 Viral Subtype Differences in the Rate of CD4+ T-Cell Decline Among HIV Seroincident Antiretroviral Naive Persons in Rakai District, Uganda

Noah Kiwanuka *,, Merlin Robb , Oliver Laeyendecker ‡,§, Godfrey Kigozi , Fred Wabwire-Mangen *, Fredrick E Makumbi *,, Fred Nalugoda , Joseph Kagaayi , Michael Eller , Leigh Anne Eller , David Serwadda , Nelson K Sewankambo #, Steven J Reynolds , Thomas C Quinn ‡,§, Ronald H Gray **, Maria J Wawer #, Christopher C Whalen *,††
PMCID: PMC2877752  NIHMSID: NIHMS183752  PMID: 20010433

Abstract

Background

Data on the effect of HIV-1 viral subtype on CD4+ T-cell decline are limited.

Methods

We assessed the rate of CD4+ T-cell decline per year among 312 HIV seroincident persons infected with different HIV-1 subtypes. Rates of CD4+ decline by HIV-1 subtype were determined by linear mixed effects models, using an unstructured convariance structure.

Results

A total of 59.6% had D, 15.7% A, 18.9% recombinant viruses (R), and 5.8% multiple subtypes (M). For all subtypes combined, the overall rate of CD4+ T-cell decline was −34.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), −47.1, −22.0] cells/μL per yr, adjusted for age, sex, baseline CD4+ counts, and viral load. Compared with subtype A, the adjusted rate of CD4 cell loss was −73.7/μL/yr (95% CI, −113.5, −33.8, P < 0.001) for subtype D, −43.2/μL/yr (95% CI, −90.2, 3.8, P = 0.072) for recombinants, and −63.9/μL/yr (95% CI, −132.3, 4.4, P = 0.067) for infection with multiple HIV subtypes. Square-root transformation of CD4+ cell counts did not change the results.

Conclusions

Infection with subtype D is associated with significantly faster rates of CD4+ T-cell loss than subtype A. This may explain the more rapid disease progression for subtype D compared with subtype A.

Keywords: HIV-1 subtypes, rate of CD4+, cell decline, HIV disease progression

Introduction

Progressive untreated HIV infection is characterized by declines in the number and functionality of CD4+ T cells, leading to immunodeficiency. The CD4+ T-cell count is a marker of HIV disease progression and a criterion for initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and changes in CD4+ T-cell counts, together with viral load, are also used assess the response to ART.1 Despite the evidence for a differential rate of HIV disease progression between HIV-1 subtypes,26 the effect of HIV-1 subtypes on the rate of CD4+ T-cell decline has not been well documented. Rates of CD4+ T-cell decline between −33 and −77 cells/μL per year have been reported in North America and Europe where subtype B predominates6,7 and studies in sub–Saharan Africa have estimated rates of decline ranging from −21.5 to −47.1 cells/μL per year, based primarily on data in HIV prevalent populations (in whom the date of HIV acquisition is unknown) or small and highly selected populations of seroincident individuals infected with subtype C.810 Prior studies of the rates of CD4+ T-cell loss by HIV-1 viral subtype have been hindered by the fact that there are few populations with multiple circulating subtypes and uniform modes of HIV transmission with known dates of infection, which would permit a direct assessment of the contribution of subtype per se to the rates of CD4+ T-cell loss.

The population of Rakai district, Uganda, represents a unique opportunity to compare effects of different HIV-1 subtypes, because HIV subtypes A and D, and multiple recombinant strains cocirculate and are transmitted almost exclusively through heterosexual vaginal intercourse. We previously reported more rapid HIV disease progression for non-A subtypes compared with subtype A in the Rakai population.4 In this paper, we describe rates of CD4+ T-cell decline in seroincident ART-naive adults heterosexually infected with HIV subtypes A, D, circulating recombinant viruses (R), or multiple HIV subtypes (M) in rural Rakai, where 74% of the population belongs to 1 tribal group, the Baganda.

Subjects, Materials, and Methods

Study Population

Since 1994, the Rakai Health Sciences Program (RHSP) has conducted community-based cohort surveillance of adults aged 15–49 years. Consenting HIV-1 seroconverters identified between 1997 and 2002 were enrolled into a supplementary investigation—the Molecular Epidemiological Research (MER) study. The study procedures have been previously described.4 Briefly, participants were seen at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after seroconversion was detected, and annually thereafter. At each visit, a standardized questionnaire was administered, clinical examination was done, and blood was collected for HIV-1 subtyping, viral load quantification, and CD4+ T-cell counts. Participants were provided with free voluntary HIV counseling and testing, condoms, and treatment for sexually transmitted infections and opportunistic infections. Study activities were conducted at mobile clinics (“hubs”) located in the communities and at the RHSP main clinic. Participants who did not return for scheduled visits were actively followed up in their homes.

The MER study was conducted from 1999 to early 2004, before routine Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and ART became available in Rakai district. At the end of the MER study (2004), participant follow-up continued via the annual community cohort surveys. Starting in June 2004, with support from the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, HIV-infected participants were provided with free Cotrimoxazole and ART was initiated in persons with CD4 counts ≤250 or World Health Organization stage 3 or 4 disease. All participants who were not yet ART eligible received CD4 screening and clinical examination to determine whether ART was indicated. Institutional Review Board approvals were obtained from Uganda Virus Research Institute's Science and Ethics Committee, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, and Institution Review Boards of collaborating US institutions (Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Columbia University, and Johns Hopkins University).

Laboratory Analysis

HIV serology was conducted using 2 enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Vironostika HIV-1, Organon Teknika, Charlotte, NC and Cambridge Biotech, Worcester, MA). EIA discordant and all concordant-positive seroconversion samples were confirmed by Western blot (HIV-1 Western blot, Bio-Merieux-Vitek, St. Louis, MO). HIV-1 plasma viral load was determined by a reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay (AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR version 1.5 Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, NJ) which has been validated in all group M subtypes of HIV-1, including subtypes A and D, which predominate in Uganda. The standard assay with a lower limit of detection of 400 copies/mL was used. CD4+ T-cell counts were performed using a BD FACScount system until 2004 and BD Facscalibur flow cytometer thereafter. Syphilis was tested by use of rapid plasma reagin and positive rapid plasma reagins were confirmed by the Treponema pallidum particle aggluniation test. Testing was done following manufacturers protocols. HIV-1 subtypes were determined by the multiregion hybridization assay (MHAacd) which can distinguish between pure, recombinants, and multiple subtypes for subtypes A, C, and D as previously described.11,12 Briefly, viral RNA was extracted from plasma using the MagNA pure total nucleic acid robotic extraction procedure (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN). RNA was amplified for 5 regions (gag, pol, vpu, env, and gp41) of the HIV-1 genome by real-time PCR. A second round real-time PCR using a TaqMan probe specific for subtypes A, C, or D was performed on each of the first round products. HIV-1 subtype was assigned for each region based on the reactivity of the probes. Samples with the identical reactivity for each region of the viral genome were considered pure subtypes, those with reactivity to different probes in different regions were considered recombinants, and those that had a region of the virus where multiple subtype specific probes reacted were considered multiple virus strains.

Statistical Analysis

The study population comprised 312 HIV-1 incident persons with 2 or more CD4+ T-cell measurements. Baseline characteristics were compared according to infecting HIV-1 subtype and differences were assessed using ANOVA for continuous variables and chi-square and Fisher Exact tests for categorical variables. The intervals between CD4+ T-cell measurements were adjusted to an annual scale to facilitate the interpretation of rates of CD4+ T cells decline per year. Rates of CD4+ T cells decline per year were estimated using raw and square-root transformed CD4+ T-cell values; square-root transformation provides variance stabilization for repeated measures analysis and has been previously used for CD4+ T-cell trajectory analysis.7,13,14 Multilevel linear mixed effects models with robust standard error estimation to account for correlation between repeated measurements within each individual were used to estimate the annual rate of CD4 cell decline, assuming an unstructured covariance structure.15,16 The final model adjusted for age, sex, baseline CD4 cell counts, and HIV viral load (log10). Incident syphilis, which in previous studies was found to be associated with an increase in HIV viral load and a decrease in CD4 cell counts,17,18 and body mass index were dropped from the model because they did not improve model fit. To estimate the natural rate of CD4 cell decline, follow-up was restricted to the period before the introduction of Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and ART in the study population. Analyses were done using Stata Release 10 (Stata Corporation, 4905 Lakeway Drive, College Station, TX).

Results

Among the 312 persons, 59.6% infections were subtype D, 15.7% subtype A, 18.9% intersubtype recombinants (R), and 5.8% with multiple strains (M). The median interval between the estimated date of seroconversion and date of the baseline CD4+ T-cell measurement was 10.3 (IQR; 8.2–30.7) months which did not differ by subtype (P = 0.57). The median total follow-up time was 35.3 months (IQR; 22.1–50.0). About a half (56.1%) were aged below 30 years, 59.3% were women, 11% had no formal education, and 76% had a body mass index of ≥20 at baseline (Table 1). The median baseline CD4+ T-cell count was 524 (IQR; 384–717) and 54% of the participants had a baseline CD4+ T-cell count of >500 cells/μL.

TABLE 1.

Descriptive Characteristics of the Study Population (N = 312)

Age at enrolment (yrs)
 16–29, n (%) 175 (56.1%)
 30–39, n (%) 92 (29.5%)
 40+, n (%) 45 (14.4%)
Sex
 Male, n (%) 127 (40.7%)
 Female, n (%) 185 (59.3%)
Highest education level
 No education, n (%) 34 (10.9%)
 Primary, n (%) 198 (63.5%)
 Secondary or more, n (%) 80 (25.6%)
CD4+ cell counts data
 Mean initial count (SD) 563 (240)
 Median initial count (IQR) 524 (384–717)
 Median no. of CD4+ measurements (IQR) 3 (2–4)
 Median time interval between consecutive measurements [months(IQR)] 10.3 (3.15–12)
 Median interval between seroconversion and initial CD4+ measurements [months(IQR)] 10.3 (8.2–30.7)
Analyses follow up time (mo)
 Mean (range) 37.9 (2.0–83.5)
 Median (IQR) 35.6 (22.4–51.0)
Initial CD4+ cell count
 >500, n (%) 169 (54.2%)
 351–500, n (%) 85 (27.2%)
 ≤350, n (%) 58 (18.6%)
Body mass index
 ≤20, n (%) 75 (24.0%)
 20–24.9, n (%) 196 (62.8%)
 25–29.9, n (%) 41 (13.1%)
HIV load (log10)
 Mean (SD) 4.69 (0.72)
 Median (IQR) 4.76 (4.23–5.27)
HIV-1 subtype
 D, n (%) 186 (59.6%)
 R, n (%) 59 (18.9%)
 A, n (%) 49 (15.7%)
 M, n (%) 18 (5.8%)

There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of persons infected with the 4 subtype groups with respect to age (P = 0.16), sex (P = 0.46), and mean log10 HIV viral load (P = 0.75) (Table 2). However, there were borderline statistical differences in baseline CD4+ T-cell counts across subtypes; the mean baseline CD4+ T-cell counts were 537 cells/μL for persons infected with subtype D, 568 cells/μL for recombinants, 632 cells/μL for subtype A, and 632 cells/μL for multiple HIV subtypes (P = 0.05). The baseline CD4+ T-cell counts were significantly higher for subtype A relative to D (P = 0.01), but no statistically significant differences in baseline CD4+ cell counts were observed between recombinant viruses and subtype A (P = 0.19). Men were older than women (31.4 versus 28.8 years, respectively, P = 0.003) and had higher HIV viral loads (4.93 versus 4.53, respectively, P < 0.001) (data not shown). Of the 28 pre-ART AIDS-associated deaths that occurred, 2% (1/48) were among subtype A–infected persons, 6.8% (4/55) among R, 11.1% (2/16) for M, and 11.3% (21/165) for subtype D Although across all subtypes differences in mortality were not statistically significant (P = 0.21), significant differences were observed between subtypes A and D (P = 0.048).

TABLE 2.

Comparison Study Population Characteristics by Infecting HIV-1 Viral Subtype

HIV-1 viral subtype

Characteristic All (N = 312) A (n = 49) D (n = 186) R (n = 59) M (n = 18) P
Age (yrs)
 16–29 175 (56.1%) 34 (19.4%) 94 (53.7%) 36 (20.6%) 11 (6.3%)
 30–39 92(29.5%) 9 (9.8%) 66 (71.4%) 13 (14.1%) 4 (4.3%)
 40+ 45(14.4%) 6 (13.3%) 26 (57.8%) 10 (22.2%) 3 (6.7%) 0.16
Sex
 Male 127 (40.7%) 20 (15.7%) 70 (55.1%) 29 (22.8%) 8 (6.3%)
 Female 185 (59.3%) 29 (15.7%) 116 (62.7%) 30 (16.2%) 10 (5.4%) 0.46
Baseline CD4+ (cells/μL)
 Mean (SD) 563 (240.5) 632 (275.0) 537 (230.1) 568 (236.5) 632 (228.5) 0.05
No. of CD4 measurements
 Mean (SD) 4.4 (1.6) 5.1 (1.6) 4.8 (1.6) 5.1 (1.7) 3.9 (0.8) 0.11
 Median (IQR) 4(3–5) 5 (4–6) 5 (4–6) 5 (4–6) 4 (3–5) 0.12
Plasma HIV RNA (log10)
 Mean (SD) 4.69 (0.72) 4.69 (0.69) 4.75 (0.73) 4.62 (0.66) 4.84 (0.57) 0.75
 Median (IQR) 4.76 (4.23–5.27) 4.59 (4.35–5.16) 4.84 (4.22–5.37) 4.73 (4.15–5.15) 4.85 (4.43–5.12) 0.20

Regardless of infecting HIV-1 subtype, the overall adjusted rate of CD4 decline was −34.5 cells/yr [95% confidence interval (CI), −47.1, −22.0] cells/μL per year, adjusted for age, sex, baseline CD4 counts, and HIV viral load. Relative to subtype A, the adjusted rate of CD4 cell loss was −73.7/μL per year (95% CI, −113.5, −33.8, P < 0.001) for subtype D, 243.2/μL per year (95% CI, −90.2, 3.8, P = 0.072) for recombinants, and −63.9/μL per year (95% CI, −132.3, 4.4, P = 0.067) for infection with multiple HIV subtypes (Table 3). Square-root transformation of CD4+ cell counts did not change the results; the adjusted slope of CD4+ T-cell decline was significantly higher for subtype D relative to subtype A [−1.49/yr (95% CI,−2.36, −0.61, P = 0.001)]. Intersubtype recombinant viruses [−0.89/yr (95% CI, −1.92, 0.14, P = 0.09)] and multiple subtypes [−1.06/yr (95% CI; −2.56, 0.43, P = 0.16)] were also associated with higher adjusted slopes of CD4+ T-cell loss than subtype A but the differences did not attain statistical significance.

TABLE 3.

Rates of CD4+ T-Cell Decline Per Year by HIV-1 Viral Subtype, Adjusted for Age, Sex, Baseline CD4+ T-Cell Counts, and Plasma HIV RNA Load (Viral Load)

Rates on raw CD4+ counts Rates on square-root scale


HIV-1 subtype Rate 95% CI P Rate 95% CI P
D −73.7 (−113.5, −33.8) <0.001 −1.49 (−2.36, −0.61) 0.001
Recombinants −43.2 (−90.2, 3.8) 0.072 −0.89 (−1.92, 0.14) 0.09
Multiple strains −63.9 (−132.3, 4.4) 0.067 −1.06 (−2.56, 0.43) 0.16
A (referent)

Discussion

In ART and Cotrimoxazole-na-ve HIV-1 seroconverters in chronic stage of HIV disease, the adjusted annual rate of CD4+ cell decline was significantly greater among persons infected with subtype D compared with those with subtype A. Higher rates of CD4+ decline were also observed for recombinant viruses and multiple HIV-1 subtypes compared with subtype A, but the differences were of borderline statistical significance. We believe this is the first study to directly assess subtype differences in CD4+ cell loss among HIV seroincident persons in a population with multiple circulating subtypes acquired through one predominant mode of transmission, heterosexual vaginal intercourse. Intravenous drug use is not practiced by this rural population, and anal intercourse is rare, as has been determined both by interview and through physical examination in Rakai Program sexually transmitted infection clinics. We also previously published on a lack of association between HIV acquisition and receipt of injections in Rakai.19 The relative homogeneity of the population (three quarters are members of the Baganda ethnic group), and of the mode of transmission, minimize confounding which may occur in settings where diverse modes of HIV transmission could potentially affect long-term health outcomes.

Our findings are consistent with previous reports of rapid HIV disease progression for non-A viruses.26 Differences in rates of CD4+ decline by HIV-1 subtype might partly be explained by differential chemokine coreceptor usage and virulence.1922 The emergence of CXCR4 (X4) tropic viruses is associated with a more rapid decline in CD4+ T cells. Studies from this population and the population in the neighboring Masaka district have found higher frequencies of X4 tropism for subtype D compared with subtype A and recombinant viruses.2023

For all subtypes, the overall adjusted annual rate of CD4 cell loss in Rakai was −34.5 (95% CI, −47.1, −22.0) cells/μL which is similar to rates reported in previous sub–Saharan African studies911 and in North America and Europe.6,7 We also found that subtype A was associated with higher baseline CD4+ cell counts than subtype D (537 versus 632, cells/μL, P = 0.01). Because the median duration between seroconversion and baseline CD4+ T-cell measurements was 10.3 months, lower baseline CD4+ counts among subtype D–infected persons compared with those with subtype A could reflect early disease progression. Overall, the median CD4+ cell count at baseline was 524 (IQR; 384–717) which is not statistically different from CD4+ counts among HIV-uninfected adults in Uganda,24 Kenya,25 and Tanzania.26

This study has limitations. First, we did not control for host genetics yet certain genes (HLA-B and C) are associated with HIV disease progression27 but it is unlikely that genetic heterogeneity would vary by subtype of infecting virus. Secondly, because of small numbers, CD4+ cell decline could not be assessed by levels of HIV viral load. Third, CD4+ decline in advanced stages of HIV disease could not be determined because the period of observation before the availability of Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis and or ART in late 2004 was not sufficiently long. Lastly, CD4 decline rates were modeled linearly yet the rate of CD4 decline immediately after seroconversion differs from that in chronic or late stage disease. Because most participants were first assessed 10 months after infection and the duration of observation was relatively short, we believe they were largely in latent stage of disease during which time CD4 decline is likely to be more linear.

In conclusion, among persons in latent stage of HIV disease, non-A subtypes (ie, subtype D, recombinants, or multiple strains incorporating subtype D) have a higher rates of CD4+ cell loss compared with subtype A. In areas such as sub–Saharan Africa where the prevalence of subtype D is high, it may be beneficial to initiate ART at CD4 cell counts greater than 200 cells/μL28 and to monitor CD4+ counts more frequently before ART initiation.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the study participants and staff of RHSP, the Director and staff of Uganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, and to staff of Fogarty AIDS International Training and Research Program at Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, for their contribution and support toward this work.

Supported by the Department of the Army, United States Army Medical Research and Material Command Cooperative Agreement DAMD17-98-2-8007 and the Henry M. Jackson Foundation, grants 5D43TW00010 and 2 D 43 TW000010-19 from the Fogarty Foundation, NIH, and Fogarty AIDS International Training and Research Program at Case Western Reserve University, USA, and supported by the Division of Intramural Research, NIAID, NIH. The content does not necessarily reflect the position or policies of the US Government, the Department of Army, MRCM, the Henry M. Jackson Foundation, or the Fogarty Foundation, NIH.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors do not have a commercial or other association that might pose a conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Mellors JW, Munoz A, Giorgi JV, et al. Plasma viral load and CD4+ lymphocytes as prognostic markers of HIV-1 infection. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:946–954. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-12-199706150-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaleebu P, French N, Mahe C, et al. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 envelope subtypes A and D on disease progression in a large cohort of HIV-1-positive persons in Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:1244–1250. doi: 10.1086/340130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baeten JM, Chohan B, Lavreys L, et al. HIV-1 subtype D infection is associated with faster disease progression than subtype A in spite of similar plasma HIV-1 loads. J Infect Dis. 2007;195:1177–1180. doi: 10.1086/512682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kiwanuka N, Laeyendecker O, Robb M, et al. Effect of HIV-1 subtypes on disease progression in a cohort of incident cases infected with pure subtypes, recombinants, and multiple subtypes, Rakai, Uganda. J Infect Dis. 2008;197:707–713. doi: 10.1086/527416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vasan A, Renjifo B, Hertzmark E, et al. Different rates of disease progression of HIV type 1 infection in Tanzania based on infecting subtype. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:843–852. doi: 10.1086/499952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anastos K, Gange SJ, Lau B, et al. Association of race and gender with HIV-1 RNA levels and immunologic progression. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2000;24:218–226. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200007010-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.CASCADE Collaboration. Differences in CD4 cell counts at seroconversion and decline among 5739 HIV-1-infected individuals with well-estimated dates of seroconversion. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;34:76–83. doi: 10.1097/00126334-200309010-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Holmes CB, Wood R, Badri M, et al. CD4 decline and incidence of opportunistic infections in Cape Town, South Africa: implications for prophylaxis and treatment. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42:464–469. doi: 10.1097/01.qai.0000225729.79610.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Urassa W, Bakari M, Sandstrom E, et al. Rate of decline of absolute number and percentage of CD4 T lymphocytes among HIV-1-infected adults in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. AIDS. 2004;18:433–438. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200402200-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Katubulushi M, Zulu I, Yavwa F, et al. Slow decline in CD4 cell count in a cohort of HIV-infected adults living in Lusaka, Zambia. AIDS. 2005;19:102–103. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200501030-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arroyo MA, Hoelscher M, Sanders-Buell E, et al. HIV type 1 subtypes among blood donors in the Mbeya region of southwest Tanzania. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2004;20:895–901. doi: 10.1089/0889222041725235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hoelscher M, Dowling WE, Sanders-Buell E, et al. Detection of HIV-1 subtypes, recombinants, and dual infections in east Africa by a multiregion hybridization assay. AIDS. 2002;16:2055–2064. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200210180-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fidler S, Fox J, Touloumi G, et al. Slower CD4 cell decline following cessation of a 3 month course of HAART in primary HIV infection: findings from an observational cohort. AIDS. 2007;21:1283–91. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3280b07b5b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Keller M, Lu Y, Lalonde RG, et al. Impact of HIV-1 viral subtype on CD4+ T-cell decline and clinical outcomes in antiretroviral naive patients receiving universal healthcare. AIDS. 2009;23:731–737. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328326f77f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laird NM, Ware JH. Random effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics. 1982;38:963–974. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Singer JD, Willet JB. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. 1st. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kofoed K, Gerstoft J, Mathiesen LR, et al. Syphilis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 coinfection: influence on CD4 T-cell count, HIV-1 viral load, and treatment response. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:143–148. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000187262.56820.c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Buchacz K, Patel P, Taylor M, et al. Syphilis increases HIV viral load and decreases CD4 cell counts in HIV-infected patients with new syphilis infections. AIDS. 2004;18:2075–2079. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200410210-00012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kiwanuka N, Gray RH, Serwadda D, et al. The incidence of HIV-1 associated with injections and transfusions in a prospective cohort, Rakai, Uganda. AIDS. 2004;18:342–344. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200401230-00032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tscherning C, Alaeus A, Fredriksson R, et al. Differences in chemokine coreceptor usage between genetic subtypes of HIV-1. Virology. 1998;241:181–188. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Wolf F, Hogervorst E, Goudsmit J, et al. Syncytium-inducing and non-syncytium-inducing capacity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtypes other than B: phenotypic and genotypic characteristics. WHO Network for HIV Isolation and Characterization. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1994;10:1387–1400. doi: 10.1089/aid.1994.10.1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kaleebu P, Nankya IL, Yirrell DL, et al. Relation between chemokine receptor use, disease stage, and hiv-1 subtypes A and D: results from a rural Ugandan cohort. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45:28–33. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e3180385aa0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Shepherd JC, Laeyendecker O, Serwadda D. Reduced transmission of HIV-1 subtype D compared with subtype A in Rakai, Uganda. Infectious Diseases Society of America 2004 Annual Meeting Abstract 98 [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lugada ES, Mermin J, Kaharuza F, et al. Population-based hematologic and immunologic reference values for a healthy Ugandan population. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2004;11:29–34. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.11.1.29-34.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kibaya RS, Bautista CT, Sawe FK, et al. Reference ranges for the clinical laboratory derived from a rural population in Kericho, Kenya. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saathoff E, Schneider P, Kleinfeldt V, et al. Laboratory reference values for healthy adults from southern Tanzania. Tropical Med Int Health. 2008;13:1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02047.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fellay J, Shianna KV, Ge D, et al. A whole-genome association study of major determinants for host control of HIV-1. Science. 2007;317:944–947. doi: 10.1126/science.1143767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.WHO clinical staging for HIV/AIDS and HIV/AIDS case definitions for surveillance: African Region. 2005 http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/guidelines/clinicalstaging.pdf.

RESOURCES