Skip to main content
The Journal of Biological Chemistry logoLink to The Journal of Biological Chemistry
. 2010 Mar 30;285(22):16495–16503. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.102848

Activation of Noncanonical NF-κB Signaling by the Oncoprotein Tio*

Sarah Jill de Jong 1, Jens-Christian Albrecht 1, Monika Schmidt 1, Ingrid Müller-Fleckenstein 1, Brigitte Biesinger 1,1
PMCID: PMC2878063  PMID: 20353939

Abstract

NF-κB transcription factors are key regulators of cellular proliferation and frequently contribute to oncogenesis. The herpesviral oncoprotein Tio, which promotes growth transformation of human T cells in a recombinant herpesvirus saimiri background, potently induces canonical NF-κB signaling through membrane recruitment of the ubiquitin ligase tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6). Here, we show that, in addition to Tio-TRAF6 interaction, the Tio-induced canonical NF-κB signal requires the presence of the regulatory subunit of the inhibitor of κB kinase (IKK) complex, NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO), and the activity of its key kinase, IKKβ, to up-regulate expression of endogenous cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 2 (cIAP2) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) proteins. Dependent on TRAF6 and NEMO, Tio enhances the expression of the noncanonical NF-κB proteins, p100 and RelB. Independent of TRAF6 and NEMO, Tio mediates stabilization of the noncanonical kinase, NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK). Concomitantly, Tio induces efficient processing of the p100 precursor molecule to its active form, p52, as well as DNA binding of nuclear p52 and RelB. In human T cells transformed by infection with a Tio-recombinant virus, sustained expression of p100, RelB, and cIAP2 depends on IKKβ activity, yet processing to p52 remains largely unaffected by IKKβ inhibition. However, long term inhibition of IKKβ disrupts the continuous growth of the transformed cells and induces cell death. Hence, the Tio oncoprotein triggers noncanonical NF-κB signaling through NEMO-dependent up-regulation of p100 precursor and RelB, as well as through NEMO-independent generation of p52 effector.

Keywords: DNA-binding Protein, Lymphocyte, NF-κB, Oncogenic Viruses, TRAF, Viral Protein, Tio, Growth Transformation, Herpesvirus Ateles, Herpesvirus Saimiri

Introduction

The family of NF-κB2 transcription factors plays a pivotal role in a multitude of physiological and pathological processes, ranging from tissue homeostasis to inflammation and cancer. Exacerbated NF-κB activation has been associated with a wide range of diseases, including hematopoietic malignancies (1), and accompanies leukemia and lymphoma induced by human T cell leukemia virus type I, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, and Epstein-Barr virus, respectively (2).

Commonly, a canonical or classical NF-κB pathway is distinguished from a noncanonical or alternative pathway. Canonical NF-κB signaling is induced in response to a wide variety of stimuli, including proinflammatory cytokines, T cell receptor engagement, and exposure of Toll-like receptors to microbial components. Intracellular signaling proceeds through a broad range of adaptor molecules, including members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family, especially TRAF2 and TRAF6. In addition to their adaptor function, these TRAFs possess an intrinsic ubiquitin E3-ligase activity that contributes to their crucial role in NF-κB activation. The point of convergence for canonical NF-κB signaling is the inhibitor of κB-kinase (IKK) complex composed of two related kinases, IKKα and IKKβ, and a regulatory subunit, NF-κB essential modulator (NEMO) or IKKγ. Mechanistically, polyubiquitin-mediated oligomerization of NEMO likely provides the platform for enzymatic activation of IKKα and, in particular, IKKβ. Major substrates of the activated IKK complex are the inhibitors of κB (IκBs). They are phosphorylated at two distinct serine residues and thereby marked for Lys48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. This leads to the liberation and nuclear translocation of canonical NF-κB dimers, including the prototypical p50·p65 complex (p50·RelA). Noncanonical NF-κB activation is initiated through distinct tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily members. Their stimulation inhibits the constitutive turnover of the NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK). Subsequently, NIK-activated IKKα homodimers phosphorylate the NF-κB2 precursor molecule p100, which is associated with RelB. Phosphorylation induces ubiquitination and partial degradation of p100 to p52. Resulting p52·RelB NF-κB dimers translocate to the nucleus to activate gene transcription (3).

The two NF-κB pathways are generally assigned to different biological functions. Canonical signaling dominates early transcription of proinflammatory and antiapoptotic genes, although the delayed noncanonical responses govern cellular differentiation and organ development. This implies that the diverse NF-κB dimers activated by these pathways are involved in different transcriptional programs. However, although more than 100 NF-κB-regulated genes have been identified, their assignment to individual NF-κB dimers or pathways is still fragmentary. The poor amenability of this subject is based on the multitude of potential dimers, their interactions with divergent κB sites and other transcriptional regulators, and the dynamic control of NF-κB signaling (5). Another layer of complexity is added by the receptors triggering NF-κB activity; they usually elicit signaling to additional transcription factors as well as cross-talk between the canonical and noncanonical pathways (6). A prominent example for the dynamic reciprocal regulation is the induction of p100 (NF-κB2) and RelB, the regulator and effector molecules of the noncanonical pathway, by canonical NF-κB proteins (7, 8). Thus, addressing any of the biological NF-κB functions requires dissection of both the canonical and the noncanonical pathways.

Herpesvirus ateles induces T cell malignancies in New World primates other than its natural host, the spider monkey, and transforms simian T cells in culture (9). The closely related herpesvirus saimiri in addition transforms human T cells to permanent growth in culture (10). Its transforming potential depends on the presence of the oncogenes stpC and tip (11). The function of StpC relies on a TRAF2 binding site that mediates NF-κB activation (12, 13). Tip (tyrosine kinase-interacting protein) was identified as a binding partner of the Src family kinase (SFK) Lck (14), and complex interactions with this kinase are required for viral transformation (15). The herpesvirus ateles oncogene tio substitutes for stpC and tip in the transformation of human T cells (16). To retain their transforming potential, recombinant viruses require a SFK interaction motif and the integrity of a distinct tyrosine phosphorylation site (Tyr136) within the oncoprotein Tio (17, 18). Tio is anchored to the plasma membrane and exposes an N-terminal protein interaction motif, which specifically recruits TRAF6, a cofactor of canonical NF-κB signaling. As a consequence, Tio·TRAF6 membrane complexes activate NF-κB (19).

Here, we addressed the relevance and the specific pathways of NF-κB activation by Tio in T cells. Our results demonstrate that proliferation of human T cells transformed by Tio-recombinant virus relies on IKKβ activity, establishing an essential role of canonical NF-κB activity for the oncogenic capacity of Tio. Furthermore, Tio induces stabilization of NIK as well as DNA binding of noncanonical p52 and RelB proteins. Thereby, Tio is identified as a novel regulator of noncanonical NF-κB activity.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Cell Culture and Electroporation

Jurkat T cells (NEMO+ and NEMO) were cultured at 0.5–1.0 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, glutamine, and antibiotics. Jurkat clones carrying an NF-κB-driven CD14 reporter were a gift from Adrian T. Ting (20). Transformed peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) cell lines 1763 YYYY, 1765 YYYY, and 1766 YYYY were cultured as previously described (16). Jurkat T cells (5 × 106 cells/sample) were transfected in antibiotic-free medium containing a total of 50 μg of plasmid DNA. Vector plasmid (pEF1/myc-His A or B; Invitrogen) was used to equalize promoter abundance. Electroporation was carried out using a Gene Pulser X cellTM Electroporation System (Bio-Rad) at 250 V and 1500 microfarads. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) and processed for immunoblotting, luciferase assay or flow cytometry.

Expression Plasmids

FLAG-tagged Tio expression constructs and mutants (P1/mT6b; Y136F; PARG/mSH3b) as described previously (1719) were recloned from pcDNA3.1 background using BamHI and EcoRI into pEF1 vector. Double mutant mT6b-mSH3b was generated by substitution of a Bsu36I–EcoRI fragment of pEF1-mT6b with the corresponding mutated fragment of pEF1-mSH3b. Plasmid pEF1-myc-NEMO was generated via PCR from pMSCVpuro-HA-NEMO (21) with primers NEMO-BamHI-myc-5′ (5′-CAATGGATCCGAAATGGAACAAAAACTCATCTCAGAAGAGGATCTGATGAATAGGCACCTCTGGAAGAGC-3′) and NEMO-EcoRI-3′ (5′-TGGAGAATTCTACTCAATGCACTCCATGACATGTATC-3′) and cloned into pEF1 using BamHI and EcoRI. Integrity of the expression cassette was confirmed by DNA sequencing.

Immunoblotting and Antibodies

Jurkat T cells and transformed PBL cell lines were lysed and processed for immunoblotting as described (19). Blot membranes were blocked with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 5% milk powder, or with NET-gelatin (150 mm NaCl, 5 mm EDTA, 50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.05% Triton X-100, 2.5 g/liter gelatin). Primary antibodies used were directed against: cIAP2 (58C7), NIK, p100/p52 (18D10) (Cell Signaling Technology); FLAG epitope (M2, horseradish peroxidase-coupled) (Sigma); RelB (C-19), Hsp90α/β (F-8), NEMO (FL-419) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Secondary antibodies were horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse Ig F(ab′)2 (GE Healthcare) or anti-rabbit Ig (P0399; DAKO). Antibodies were diluted in blocking buffer. Detection via enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) was carried out with a Kodak Image Station 4000MM PRO camera (Kodak). Densitometric quantification was performed with Aida Image Analyzer 3.10 software (raytest).

Immunoprecipitation

Jurkat T cells and transformed PBL cell lines were lysed as described previously (19), using 0.5% Nonidet P-40 as detergent. Immunoprecipitations were carried out using protein A Dynabeads® (Invitrogen) coupled with 5 μl of NIK antibody. Antibody coupling and antigen capture were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. The beads were washed once with 100 μl of lysis buffer. Protein was eluted with 15 μl of 50 mm glycine, pH 2.8; subsequently the pH was adjusted using an equal volume of 1 m Tris, pH 7.5. To ensure equal protein concentrations within the samples, 1/25 of the depleted lysate was used as control. Protein was denatured with Roti®-Load 1 buffer (Roth) at 70 °C for 5 min.

Luciferase Reporter Assay and Plasmids

The reporter plasmid pNF-κBluc (Stratagene) contains five NF-κB consensus binding sites upstream of a luciferase gene. Co-transfections included 10 μg of reporter DNA and 40 μg of expression construct. After 48 h, cells were harvested and lysed in 100 mm K3PO4 containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min at room temperature. Upon injection of 100 μl of assay buffer (200 mm Tris-HCl, 15 mm MgSO4, 0.1 mm EDTA, pH 8.0, 1 μm dithiothreitol, 2 μm ATP, 75 μm d-luciferin), luminescence was measured with a Microplate Luminometer (Orion). For data analysis, the raw data were normalized to the protein level of the sample. Relative NF-κB activity in percent was calculated with the relative response ratio ((sample − negative control) × 100%)/(positive control − negative control)). Results are presented as the mean of multiple independent experiments ± S.E.

ELISA

IL-8 in supernatants of Jurkat T cells was determined 48 h after transfection with the human IL-8/NAP-1 ELISA kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Bender MedSystems, BMS204). Results are presented as mean of three independent experiments ± S.D.

Flow Cytometry

For surface staining, cells were incubated with a phycoerythrin-Cy5-coupled CD14 antibody (ImmunoTools) in FCM buffer (phosphate-buffered saline; 5% fetal calf serum, 0.01% NaN3) for 1 h, washed twice in FCM buffer, and then resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline for measurement. To determine viability after IKKβ inhibitor treatment, cells were harvested every 24 h and stained with 10 μg/ml propidium iodide. Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCaliburTM (BD Biosciences).

Oligonucleotide Pulldown

For oligonucleotide pulldown experiments, nuclear extracts were prepared with the nuclear/cytosol fractionation kit (Biovision) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Protein concentrations were determined with the Bio-Rad protein assay. Nuclear extracts (200 μg) were incubated with 50 pmol of 5′-biotinylated probe; controls for binding specificity were incubated additionally with 500 pmol of unbiotinylated competitor oligonucleotide. Pulldown conditions and buffers are described elsewhere (22). Probes were generated by annealing 5′-biotin-labeled oligonucleotide HIV-LTR-forward (5′-GGGACTTTCCGGGACTTTCCGGGACTTTCC-3′) with HIV-LTR-reverse (5′-GGAAAGTCCCGGAAAGTCCCGGAAAGTCCC-3′) and 5′biotin-labeled IFNβ-forward (5′-GGGAAATTCCGGGAAATTCCGGGAAATTCC-3′) with IFNβ-reverse (5′-GGAATTTCCCGGAATTTCCCGGAATTTCCC-3′). Oligonucleotides were obtained from Biomers.

NF-κB Inhibitor Treatment

IKKβ inhibitor (ACHP; Calbiochem) was added to 2 × 105 Jurkat T cells 4 h after transfection at the indicated concentrations. Cells and supernatants were harvested and processed for luciferase assay or ELISA 48 h after transfection. Transformed PBLs were dispensed into 24-well plates at 2 × 105 cells/well. Inhibitor was added at the indicated concentrations. For time-response measurements, fresh inhibitor was added every 24 h.

RESULTS

Tio Activates Endogenous NF-κB-dependent Target Genes

The viral oncoprotein Tio was shown to activate NF-κB in dependence on TRAF6 interaction, but independent of SFK binding within a pcDNA3.1 background (19). To confirm the NF-κB-inducing capacity of Tio within pEF1 constructs, Jurkat T cells were co-transfected with an NF-κB-specific luciferase reporter (Fig. 1A). Wild-type Tio as well as the phosphorylation site mutant Y136F and the mutant defective in SFK binding (mSH3b) strongly induced NF-κB activity. In contrast, abrogation of TRAF6 binding rendered the mutant mT6b and the double mutant mT6b-mSH3b inert. We next investigated whether Tio affected the expression of the endogenous, NF-κB-regulated cIAP2 and IL-8 genes (23, 24). Compared with a vector-transfected control, Tio strongly induced cIAP2 expression. Induction was abrogated upon mutation of the TRAF6 binding site, whereas mutation of the SFK interaction and Tyr136 phosphorylation sites resulted in an intermediate cIAP2 expression that correlated with reduced expression levels of these mutants (Fig. 1B). Tio-transfected cells secreted high amounts of IL-8. This effect was abolished by interruption of Tio-TRAF6 interaction and was independent of Tyr136 phosphorylation of Tio. However, secretion of IL-8 was also diminished when Tio was not able to interact with SFKs (Fig. 1C).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

NF-κB-driven luciferase reporter activity and induction of endogenous protein expression by pEF1-Tio. Jurkat T cells were electroporated with expression plasmids coding for FLAG-tagged Tio or Tio mutants (mT6b, Y136F, mSH3b, mT6b-mSH3b) and were harvested 48 h after transfection. Transfection of pEF1 vector DNA (vec) served as a negative control. An average of at least three independent experiments is shown. A, co-transfection of an NF-κB luciferase reporter. The relative NF-κB activity is depicted in percent, and the average of Tio-transfected samples was set to 100%. B, immunoblot analysis of whole cell lysates for endogenous cIAP2 protein expression. Protein expression of Tio was verified with a FLAG antibody. An unspecific band was used as loading control (lc). C, endogenous IL-8 in supernatants of transfected cells detected by ELISA.

Tio-mediated NF-κB Activity Depends on NEMO

Because the IKK complex is a point of convergence for canonical NF-κB-inducing stimuli, we asked whether its regulatory subunit, NEMO, was required for Tio-mediated NF-κB activity. Parental NEMO-carrying (NEMO+) and NEMO-deficient (NEMO) Jurkat T cells, both stably transduced with an NF-κB-driven CD14 reporter, were used. These cells were transfected with Tio and NEMO expression constructs and analyzed for CD14 surface expression by flow cytometry (Fig. 2A). In NEMO+ cells, expression of Tio led to an increase of CD14 on the cell surface, whereas overexpression of NEMO alone did not. After co-transfection of Tio and NEMO plasmids, expression of CD14 was comparable with that in Tio-transfected cells (Fig. 2A, upper panel). In the NEMO cell line, however, expression of Tio alone did not lead to increased CD14 surface expression, neither did transfection of a NEMO-encoding plasmid. But upon co-transfection of Tio and NEMO constructs, CD14 surface expression was restored (Fig. 2A, lower panel). To substantiate these findings further, cIAP2 expression was assessed in NEMO cells, which were transfected with expression plasmids for Tio and the respective mutants alone or in combination with a NEMO construct (Fig. 2B). In the absence of NEMO, neither wild-type Tio nor any of the Tio mutants was able to induce cIAP2 expression. If co-expressed with NEMO, Tio induced cIAP2 expression irrespective of SFK interaction and Tyr136 phosphorylation sites. However, Tio-TRAF6 interaction was required for this effect because mutants mT6b and mT6b-mSH3b were not able to increase cIAP2 expression. Thus, Tio-mediated induction of NF-κB activity requires the presence of NEMO, the regulatory subunit of the IKK complex and key determinant of the canonical pathway.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

Induction of an NF-κB-responsive CD14 reporter by pEF1-Tio in the presence or absence of NEMO. A, Jurkat T cells (NEMO+ and NEMO), stably transduced with an NF-κB-driven CD14 reporter, were transfected with Tio and NEMO expression constructs, alone or in combination. Vector-transfected cells served as a negative control. CD14 surface expression was detected 48 h after transfection with a phycoerythrin-Cy5-labeled CD14 antibody by flow cytometry. B, NEMO Jurkat T cells were transfected with Tio or Tio mutants (mT6b, Y136F, mSH3b, mT6b-mSH3b) alone or in combination with a NEMO expression plasmid. Whole cell lysates were prepared 48 h after transfection and analyzed by immunoblotting for expression of endogenous cIAP2. Expression of FLAG-Tio and NEMO was verified. Hsp90α/β expression served as a loading control. vec, vector.

Tio-mediated NF-κB Activation Induces Expression of Key Components of the Noncanonical Pathway, p100 and RelB

Based on the autoregulation and cross-regulation described for the NF-κB pathways, we analyzed the effects of Tio on noncanonical NF-κB proteins. As expected for an activator of canonical NF-κB signaling, Tio up-regulated the expression of the prototypical noncanonical NF-κB proteins, p100 and RelB, in transfected Jurkat T cells (data not shown). To strengthen this observation, we investigated the expression p100 and RelB in the NEMO cell line. Neither transfection of NEMO nor Tio constructs alone resulted in elevated levels of p100 or RelB. In contrast, reconstitution of NEMO in conjunction with Tio wild-type expression strongly induced p100 and RelB expression (Fig. 3A, four left lanes). This induction depended on Tio-TRAF6 interaction but was independent of SFK association (four right lanes). Thus, up-regulation of p100 and RelB expression through Tio relied on an intact canonical IKK complex.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Processing of p100 to p52 and expression of endogenous RelB in presence and absence of NEMO. A, NEMO Jurkat T cells were transfected with Tio or mutant expression plasmids. NEMO was reconstituted by co-transfection of a NEMO expression construct. Immunoblot analysis was performed 48 h after transfection for endogenous p100/p52 and RelB. Tio expression was confirmed with a FLAG antibody, and NEMO was detected by a specific antiserum. Hsp90α/β expression served as loading control. vec, vector. B, experiment analogous to A was performed in the absence of NEMO. A NEMO-transfected sample served as positive expression control.

Tio Induces p100/p52 Processing Independent of NEMO

After transfection of NEMO cells with any of the Tio constructs, we observed an efficient processing of p100 to its active form, p52 (Fig. 3A, five right lanes). This effect appeared to be independent of NEMO expression (third lane) and the ability of Tio to interact with TRAF6 or SFK (four right lanes). To further delineate p100 expression from processing, we performed an analogous experiment in the absence of NEMO (Fig. 3B). In this configuration, RelB and p100/p52 expression levels remained unaffected, whereas processing of p100 to p52 was strongly enhanced in the presence of the Tio constructs. We concluded that Tio is able to induce noncanonical NF-κB signaling, as judged by p100 processing, in the absence of known interaction partners as well as in the absence of canonical NF-κB signaling.

Tio-induced Nuclear p52 and RelB Bind DNA

To evaluate Tio-mediated activation of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway, we assessed Tio-induced nuclear localization and DNA binding capability of p52 and RelB in NEMO+ and NEMO Jurkat T cells. Fractionation experiments revealed that p52 and RelB efficiently translocated to the nucleus upon expression of Tio, independent of NEMO and, thus, independent of the transcriptional up-regulation of p100 and RelB (Fig. 4, input controls). Biotinylated oligonucleotides derived from the HIV LTR region and the IFNβ promoter, which both bind p52·RelB with high affinity (25), specifically precipitated Tio-induced nuclear p52 and RelB, even in the NEMO-negative context (Fig. 4).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

DNA binding of Tio-induced nuclear p52 and RelB. Oligonucleotide pulldown was performed from nuclear extracts of Tio-transfected NEMO+ and NEMO Jurkat T cells. Double-stranded biotinylated oligonucleotides, derived from the HIV LTR and the human IFNβ promoter, were incubated with nuclear extracts in the presence or absence of unbiotinylated competitor oligonucleotide (comp). Proteins bound to the biotinylated probes were captured from the lysate with streptavidin-coupled Sepharose beads and subjected to immunoblot analysis with p52 and RelB antibodies. Input, untreated nuclear lysate; nc, streptavidin-Sepharose beads incubated with lysate in the absence oligonucleotides served as negative control.

Tio Induces Stabilization of NIK

The central regulator of noncanonical NF-κB activity is the NF-κB-inducing kinase, NIK. Constitutive turnover of NIK ensures quiescence of the alternative pathway in unstimulated cells. We therefore investigated whether endogenous NIK was stabilized in Jurkat T cells expressing Tio. Immunoprecipitated endogenous NIK could be detected only in the presence of Tio (Fig. 5). This stabilization of NIK was independent of Tio-TRAF6 and Tio-SFK interactions and could be observed in the presence as well as in the absence of NEMO (Fig. 5A). Next, expression of NIK was analyzed in PBLs transformed with a Tio-recombinant virus. Stabilization of endogenous NIK could be detected in three independent cell lines (1763 YYYY, 1765 YYYY, and 1766 YYYY) (Fig. 5B). Thus, Tio likely induces noncanonical NF-κB activity through stabilization of NIK.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

Stabilization of NIK in Jurkat T cells and virus-transformed human T cells. A, Jurkat T cells (NEMO+ and NEMO) were transfected with Tio or mutant expression plasmids. Cells were lysed after 48 h, and endogenous NIK was enriched by immunoprecipitation (IP). Immunoblot analysis was performed to detect NIK. Depleted lysates (post IP) and a polyclonal rabbit antiserum were used to confirm Tio expression. Hsp90α/β expression served as loading control. vec, vector. B, experiment analogous to A was performed using virus-transformed PBLs (1763 YYYY, 1765 YYYY, 1766 YYYY). Jurkat T cells served as negative controls.

IKKβ Inhibition Represses Tio-induced NF-κB Activity in Transformed Human T Cells

To address the influence of the NF-κB signal on the growth of virus-transformed PBL lines, we employed the IKKβ inhibitor, ACHP, a compound that inhibits growth of multiple myeloma cells and induces cell death in adult T cell leukemia cells (2628). First, the efficacy of ACHP on Tio-mediated NF-κB signaling in Jurkat T cells was confirmed. To this end, Tio-expressing cells transfected with an NF-κB-specific reporter were treated with increasing concentrations of ACHP (Fig. 6). NF-κB reporter activity was strongly reduced by ACHP, even at the lowest concentration applied (Fig. 6A). Likewise, IL-8 secretion of these cells was diminished by more than 70% (Fig. 6B), whereas Tio expression remained unaffected (Fig. 6C). Hence, the IKKβ inhibitor ACHP efficiently counteracted Tio-induced NF-κB activity.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

Effects of IKKβ inhibition on Tio-induced NF-κB reporter activity and IL-8 expression in Jurkat T cells. Jurkat T cells were transfected with Tio expression plasmid and subsequently incubated with the indicated concentrations of IKKβ inhibitor, ACHP, starting 4 h after transfection. Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection. Three independent experiments were performed. A, co-transfection of an NF-κB reporter. NF-κB activity is depicted as relative response ratio with reference to the average of untreated Tio-transfected cells. vec, vector. B, determination of IL-8 levels in the supernatants by ELISA. C, protein expression of Tio verified using a FLAG-antibody. Detection of Hsp90α/β expression served as loading control.

Subsequently, the virus-transformed PBL lines were treated with the ACHP inhibitor, and their viability was monitored (Fig. 7). In all virus-transformed cell lines treatment induced dose- and time-dependent cell death, whereas cell viability of an inhibitor-treated Jurkat control was not affected (Fig. 7A). After 4 days, 30–50% of transformed PBLs treated with 2.5 μm ACHP were still viable, whereas less than 10% had survived incubation with 10 μm ACHP (Fig. 7B). These results confirm the notion that Tio-induced canonical NF-κB signal is required to maintain the transformed phenotype of human PBLs.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

Survival of human T cells transformed with Tio-recombinant herpesvirus saimiri in the presence of IKKβ inhibitor. Human PBLs transformed with Tio-recombinant herpesvirus saimiri (1763 YYYY, 1765 YYYY, and 1766 YYYY) were treated with the indicated concentrations of IKKβ inhibitor, ACHP. Jurkat T cells served as negative control. Every 24 h cells were harvested, stained with propidium iodide (PI, 10 μg/ml) and subjected to flow cytometry. Inhibitor was added freshly every 24 h. Propidium iodide-negative cells are depicted in percent of the total population. A, time response curves for 4 days treatment. B, end point analysis at day 4.

To analyze NF-κB target gene expression, the transformed cell lines were treated with 2.5 μm ACHP for 48 h and then assessed for expression of p100/p52, RelB, and cIAP2. Expression of the Tio oncogene and of Hsp90α/β confirmed cell viability under these conditions. IKKβ inhibitor treatment drastically reduced p100 expression levels in all three cell lines tested, whereas down-regulation of RelB and cIAP2 was less prominent, but nevertheless readily observed (Fig. 8A). In contrast to p100, the levels of p52 were only marginally affected by ACHP, resulting in a strong reduction of the p100/p52 expression ratio (Fig. 8B). Thus, p100 processing and hence noncanonical NF-κB signaling were still active when canonical signaling was inhibited in virus-transformed human T cells.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

Expression of p100/p52, RelB, and cIAP2 in human T cells transformed with Tio-recombinant herpesvirus saimiri in the presence of IKKβ inhibitor. Virus-transformed human PBLs (1763 YYYY, 1765 YYYY, and 1766 YYYY) were treated with 2.5 μm IKKβ inhibitor ACHP for 48 h. A, immunoblot analysis was performed to detect endogenous p100, RelB, and cIAP2 expression and p100 processing. Tio expression was verified using a polyclonal rabbit anti-Tio serum. Hsp90α/β expression served as a loading control; pc, whole cell lysate from Tio-transfected Jurkat T cells served as positive control. B, densitometric quantification of p100 and p52 protein levels was performed. The ratio of p100 to p52 expression was calculated as ((p100 sample)/(p52 sample))/((p100 untreated)/(p52 untreated)) for each cell line.

DISCUSSION

Previously we have reported that the viral oncoprotein Tio recruits TRAF6 and thereby activates NF-κB (19). The identification of NEMO as another essential cofactor now confirms that Tio utilizes the canonical pathway to induce NF-κB-regulated genes. Inhibition of IKKβ, the kinase assigned to canonical signaling, severely impaired the proliferation of human T cells transformed by a recombinant virus expressing Tio. Thus, NF-κB activation is required to maintain the permanent growth of these T cells. In analogy, the Tio-related oncoprotein StpC depends on its TRAF2 binding site to support viral transformation (12). These findings are in agreement with NF-κB representing a key pathological feature in various lymphoid malignancies, including lymphoproliferative disorders associated with human T cell leukemia virus type I, Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, and Epstein-Barr virus (29).

In accordance with the activation of the canonical pathway, cellular target genes of Tio-induced NEMO-dependent NF-κB activity include p100 and RelB, the major NF-κB proteins of noncanonical signaling. In addition, Tio drives the processing of p100 to p52, a hallmark for the activation of this pathway. Processing is independent of NEMO expression and of the ability of Tio to bind TRAF6 or Src family kinases. Tio expression further results in the nuclear translocation and DNA binding activity of p52 and RelB. Thus, independent of canonical signaling, Tio triggers an additional, as yet unknown mechanism, including the stabilization of NIK, to activate the noncanonical pathway. The relevance of this feature for Tio-dependent viral growth transformation of human T cells remains to be established. An essential role of noncanonical signaling in T cell transformation by herpesvirus saimiri is suggested by abrogation of StpC-mediated NF-κB activation upon overexpression of kinase-inactive NIK (30). However, canonical and noncanonical NF-κB activity in StpC-expressing cells remains to be differentiated. In contrast, processing of p100 to p52 is established for the Tax protein of human T cell leukemia virus type I (31), vFLIP of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (32), and LMP1 of Epstein-Barr virus (33). Of note, the noncanonical pathway is constitutively activated by genetic mutations in multiple myeloma (34, 35) and likely contributes to Notch1-induced T cell leukemia (36). Although different mechanisms are employed, this conserved pattern suggests a functional relevance of noncanonical signaling in lymphoid malignancies in general.

Analyses as to the role of noncanonical signaling in oncogenesis require the discrimination from effects mediated by canonical NF-κB signaling. In the immune system, the canonical and noncanonical NF-κB pathways have been assigned to inflammatory and developmental stimuli, respectively. However, extensive cross-talk largely hampers the dissection of specific genetic programs (6). This is exemplified by p100, which is transcriptionally up-regulated in response to canonical signals; in its newly appreciated role as a functional IκB, p100 is resistant to canonical IKKβ signals but may be processed to release canonical p50·p65 dimers in response to noncanonical IKKα activation (37). Genetically modified mouse models were intensely studied to resolve the differential functions of NF-κB proteins and their pathway-specific regulators. They confirmed the complexity of immune regulation through NF-κB (38) and even revealed unexpected antiinflammatory effects in epithelial cells (39). Given the restricted amenability of this intricate regulatory network to conventional methods, a systems biology approach was suggested to resolve the circuitry in NF-κB signaling (6). As a consequence, target genes that distinguish between individual NF-κB pathways or even dimers as well as their relevance for lymphoid malignancies remain to be defined.

NEMO-independent activation of the noncanonical NF-κB pathway by Tio was demonstrated by the induced binding of p52 and RelB to oligonucleotides derived from the HIV LTR and the IFNβ promoter. However, the luciferase reporter gene we used did not respond to Tio expression in the absence of NEMO. A lack of binding to the sequences in the reporter is unlikely, given the broad spectrum of κB sites recognized by p52·RelB dimers (25). Rather, Tio-induced noncanonical dimers may bind DNA, but turn into activators only in cooperation with additional transcription factors and co-activators (5) that may not be recruited to the reporter construct. Promoter elements preferentially binding individual NF-κB dimers have been postulated (40), and a unique type of binding site has been described for p52·RelB dimers (41). However, more recent reports challenge the existence of differential NF-κB sites (25, 42). Taken together, specificity of gene regulation may not be determined by the sequence of the NF-κB binding motif within a promoter, but rather by flanking elements recruiting additional transcription factors and by interactions of the bound NF-κB dimers with other transcriptional regulators. Such a context-specific cofactor dependence would allow the integration of multiple upstream signals at a single promoter site. This model also accommodates the recently identified dualism of transcriptional activation by canonical NF-κB p65; one set of p65-regulated promoters depends on direct contact with the Mediator complex, whereas another set of promoters responds to p65 independent of Mediator recruitment (43). Further analyses into the NEMO-independent activation of p52 and RelB by Tio can be instrumental in defining transcriptional NF-κB specificity in the absence of any apparent cross-talk.

Noncanonical NF-κB signaling is initiated by membrane-bound receptors, but downstream events had hardly been defined. Only recently, stabilization of the constitutively active NIK has been identified as a mechanism to transduce signals for p100 processing (4, 44). Thereby, NIK represents the central regulator of the noncanonical p52/RelB pathway but can simultaneously relieve canonical dimers from inhibitory p100 (37). We now describe the viral oncoprotein Tio, an integral membrane protein, as an inducer of p52 and RelB DNA binding activity and a stabilizer of NIK. A Tio double mutant, devoid of interaction sites for TRAF6 and Src family kinases, supports this activity without triggering a canonical NF-κB signal. Thus, studying the mechanism of p52 generation as well as the composition of NF-κB dimers induced by Tio, and especially by the double mutant, promises further insights into the pathway of noncanonical NF-κB signaling.

In summary, like many lymphoid tumor cells, human T cells transformed to permanent growth by a recombinant herpesvirus expressing the viral oncoprotein Tio depend on the presence of active NF-κB. To provide this activity, Tio triggers not only the canonical pathway, but also a NEMO-dependent and a NEMO-independent route to noncanonical NF-κB signaling. Taken together, these findings establish Tio as a tool to study upstream mechanisms as well as target gene regulation by noncanonical NF-κB dimers that may be relevant in lymphoid malignancies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Adrian Ting for provision of the stable Jurkat reporter cell lines (NEMO+ and NEMO) as well as Armin Ensser and Bernhard Fleckenstein for valuable discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

*

This work was supported by DFG Grants BI465/5-1 and GRK 1071.

2
The abbreviations used are:
NF-κB
nuclear factor κ light chain enhancer of activated B cells
TRAF
tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor
IKK
inhibitor of κB kinase
NEMO
NF-κB essential modulator
IκB
inhibitor of κB
NIK
NF-κB-inducing kinase
StpC
saimiri transforming protein of subgroup C
SFK
Src family kinase
Tio
two in one
Hsp
heat shock protein
cIAP2
cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 2
PBL
peripheral blood lymphocyte
ELISA
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
IL
interleukin
LTR
long terminal repeat
IFN
interferon
ACHP
2-amino-6-(2-(cyclopropylmethoxy)-6-hydroxyphenyl)-4-(4-piperidinyl)-3-pyridinecarbonitrile.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Shen H. M., Tergaonkar V. (2009) Apoptosis 14, 348–363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cesarman E., Mesri E. A. (2007) Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 312, 263–287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vallabhapurapu S., Karin M. (2009) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 693–733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zarnegar B. J., Wang Y., Mahoney D. J., Dempsey P. W., Cheung H. H., He J., Shiba T., Yang X., Yeh W. C., Mak T. W., Korneluk R. G., Cheng G. (2008) Nat. Immunol. 9, 1371–1378 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hoffmann A., Natoli G., Ghosh G. (2006) Oncogene 25, 6706–6716 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Basak S., Hoffmann A. (2008) Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 19, 187–197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lombardi L., Ciana P., Cappellini C., Trecca D., Guerrini L., Migliazza A., Maiolo A. T., Neri A. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 2328–2336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bren G. D., Solan N. J., Miyoshi H., Pennington K. N., Pobst L. J., Paya C. V. (2001) Oncogene 20, 7722–7733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Falk L. A., Nigida S. M., Deinhardt F., Wolfe L. G., Cooper R. W., Hernandez-Camacho J. I. (1974) Int. J. Cancer 14, 473–482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Biesinger B., Müller-Fleckenstein I., Simmer B., Lang G., Wittmann S., Platzer E., Desrosiers R. C., Fleckenstein B. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89, 3116–3119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Duboise S. M., Guo J., Czajak S., Desrosiers R. C., Jung J. U. (1998) J. Virol. 72, 1308–1313 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee H., Choi J. K., Li M., Kaye K., Kieff E., Jung J. U. (1999) J. Virol. 73, 3913–3919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Glanz A., Albrecht J. C., Heinemann S., Fleckenstein B., Isakov N., Biesinger B. (2008) Immunol. Cell Biol. 86, 622–630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Biesinger B., Tsygankov A. Y., Fickenscher H., Emmrich F., Fleckenstein B., Bolen J. B., Bröker B. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4729–4734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Heck E., Friedrich U., Gack M. U., Lengenfelder D., Schmidt M., Müller-Fleckenstein I., Fleckenstein B., Ensser A., Biesinger B. (2006) J. Virol. 80, 9934–9942 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Albrecht J. C., Biesinger B., Müller-Fleckenstein I., Lengenfelder D., Schmidt M., Fleckenstein B., Ensser A. (2004) J. Virol. 78, 9814–9819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Albrecht J. C., Friedrich U., Kardinal C., Koehn J., Fleckenstein B., Feller S. M., Biesinger B. (1999) J. Virol. 73, 4631–4639 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Albrecht J. C., Müller-Fleckenstein I., Schmidt M., Fleckenstein B., Biesinger B. (2005) J. Virol. 79, 10507–10513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heinemann S., Biesinger B., Fleckenstein B., Albrecht J. C. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 8565–8572 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.He K. L., Ting A. T. (2002) Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 6034–6045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wu C. J., Conze D. B., Li T., Srinivasula S. M., Ashwell J. D. (2006) Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 398–406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wies E., Hahn A. S., Schmidt K., Viebahn C., Rohland N., Lux A., Schellhorn T., Holzer A., Jung J. U., Neipel F. (2009) J. Biol. Chem. 284, 8525–8538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hong S. Y., Yoon W. H., Park J. H., Kang S. G., Ahn J. H., Lee T. H. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 18022–18028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mukaida N., Okamoto S., Ishikawa Y., Matsushima K. (1994) J. Leukocyte Biol. 56, 554–558 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fusco A. J., Huang D. B., Miller D., Wang V. Y., Vu D., Ghosh G. (2009) EMBO Rep. 10, 152–159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Murata T., Shimada M., Sakakibara S., Yoshino T., Masuda T., Shintani T., Sato H., Koriyama Y., Fukushima K., Nunami N., Yamauchi M., Fuchikami K., Komura H., Watanabe A., Ziegelbauer K. B., Bacon K. B., Lowinger T. B. (2004) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 14, 4019–4022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sanda T., Iida S., Ogura H., Asamitsu K., Murata T., Bacon K. B., Ueda R., Okamoto T. (2005) Clin. Cancer Res. 11, 1974–1982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sanda T., Asamitsu K., Ogura H., Iida S., Utsunomiya A., Ueda R., Okamoto T. (2006) Leukemia 20, 590–598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Packham G. (2008) Br. J. Haematol. 143, 3–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sorokina E. M., Merlo J. J., Jr., Tsygankov A. Y. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 13469–13477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Xiao G., Cvijic M. E., Fong A., Harhaj E. W., Uhlik M. T., Waterfield M., Sun S. C. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 6805–6815 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matta H., Chaudhary P. M. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 9399–9404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Eliopoulos A. G., Caamano J. H., Flavell J., Reynolds G. M., Murray P. G., Poyet J. L., Young L. S. (2003) Oncogene 22, 7557–7569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Keats J. J., Fonseca R., Chesi M., Schop R., Baker A., Chng W. J., Van Wier S., Tiedemann R., Shi C. X., Sebag M., Braggio E., Henry T., Zhu Y. X., Fogle H., Price-Troska T., Ahmann G., Mancini C., Brents L. A., Kumar S., Greipp P., Dispenzieri A., Bryant B., Mulligan G., Bruhn L., Barrett M., Valdez R., Trent J., Stewart A. K., Carpten J., Bergsagel P. L. (2007) Cancer Cell 12, 131–144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Annunziata C. M., Davis R. E., Demchenko Y., Bellamy W., Gabrea A., Zhan F., Lenz G., Hanamura I., Wright G., Xiao W., Dave S., Hurt E. M., Tan B., Zhao H., Stephens O., Santra M., Williams D. R., Dang L., Barlogie B., Shaughnessy J. D., Jr., Kuehl W. M., Staudt L. M. (2007) Cancer Cell 12, 115–130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Vilimas T., Mascarenhas J., Palomero T., Mandal M., Buonamici S., Meng F., Thompson B., Spaulding C., Macaroun S., Alegre M. L., Kee B. L., Ferrando A., Miele L., Aifantis I. (2007) Nat. Med. 13, 70–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Basak S., Kim H., Kearns J. D., Tergaonkar V., O'Dea E., Werner S. L., Benedict C. A., Ware C. F., Ghosh G., Verma I. M., Hoffmann A. (2007) Cell 128, 369–381 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gerondakis S., Grumont R., Gugasyan R., Wong L., Isomura I., Ho W., Banerjee A. (2006) Oncogene 25, 6781–6799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Pasparakis M. (2009) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 778–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pahl H. L. (1999) Oncogene 18, 6853–6866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bonizzi G., Bebien M., Otero D. C., Johnson-Vroom K. E., Cao Y., Vu D., Jegga A. G., Aronow B. J., Ghosh G., Rickert R. C., Karin M. (2004) EMBO J. 23, 4202–4210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Britanova L. V., Makeev V. J., Kuprash D. V. (2008) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 365, 583–588 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.van Essen D., Engist B., Natoli G., Saccani S. (2009) PLoS Biol. 7, e73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vallabhapurapu S., Matsuzawa A., Zhang W., Tseng P. H., Keats J. J., Wang H., Vignali D. A., Bergsagel P. L., Karin M. (2008) Nat. Immunol. 9, 1364–1370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Biological Chemistry are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES