Skip to main content
Psychiatry (Edgmont) logoLink to Psychiatry (Edgmont)
letter
. 2007 Sep;4(9):16–17.

Regarding Pulmonary Embolism During an Episode of Catatonic Depression

Conrad M Swartz 1
PMCID: PMC2880936  PMID: 20532113

Dear Editor:

The report1 of pulmonary embolism during an episode of catatonic depression [Psychiatry 2007;4(6):51–56] unjustifiably stated that lorazepam is effective therapy for catatonia. However, this has never been established by long-term study. Studies have reported observations for only a few days. This is analogous to the Tensilon® (edrophonium) test for myasthenia gravis, in which illness signs and symptoms are temporarily reversed but the medication is useless for maintenance. There has been no systematic long-term followup group study of benzodiazepine efficacy in catatonia. I observe that if a patient with acute catatonia shows complete remission with 1mg/day or less of lorazepam, a stable remission is reasonably likely. With higher doses patients relapse into melancholia, psychosis, or catatonia within a few days to a month. The only long-term followup treatment study of catatonic depression with statistical results used electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).2

Ignatowski, et al.,1 observed that ECT is not available in many state facilities. Administrative refusal to provide ECT when needed does not make benzodiazepines suitable for the task. The authors state there is stigma surrounding the ECT procedure. However, there is surely more stigma surrounding a patient remaining catatonic because of undertreatment and from being learning-impaired and oversimplistic from high-dose tranquilizers than from achieving remission with ECT. The authors state they have difficulty obtaining informed consent; informed consent is surely easier to obtain in psychiatric facilities that regularly provide ECT. Still, the authors' report is highly constructive because it clearly and irrefutably conveys that in treating catatonia ECT is necessary and irreplaceable, and state psychiatric hospitals that do not facilitate ECT for these patients are harming them. Why can these state hospital administrators forget the basic medical ethic of “Above all do no harm?”

With regards,
Conrad M. Swartz, PhD MD
Professor of Psychiatry (Emeritus) Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

References

  • 1.Ignatowski M, Sidhu S, Rueve M. Pulmonary embolism as a complication of major depressive disorder with catatonic features: A case report. Psychiatry. 2007;4(6):51–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Swartz CM, Morrow V, Surles L, James JF. Long-term outcome after ECT for catatonic depression. J ECT. 2001;17(3):180–3. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200109000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Sep;4(9):16–17.

Regarding Pulmonary Embolism During an Episode of Catatonic Depression

Michael Ignatowski 1, Santokh Sidhu 1, Marie Rueve 1

Author Response

The evidence-based data backing efficacy of benzodiazapines in acute catatonia is vast.1 Although there is controversy whether this treats the underlying mechanism, the mood, or psychotic disorder, we do not imply that this is the case.2 Surely the antidepressant will be the effective long-term agent once the catatonia is resolved acutely and the antidepressant is given optimal time for efficacy, at which time the patient would no longer need to be on benzodiapines. We agree with Dr. Swartz that ECT makes sense as the single best modality for long-term care of MDD with catatonic features as his article indicates, because ECT shows evidence-based indications for both depression and catatonia.3 To state that there is no justification for the use of a proven modality, such as benzodiazapines, for acute catatonia if ECT is not available is to miss the significance of this case study. Breaking the catatonia even if the depression is not treated initially is crucial in preventing the devastating consequences such as pulmonary embolism in the acute setting seen on an inpatient ward. The Tensilon test for myasthenia gravis is purely diagnostic and does not save lives, whereas benzodiazapines for catatonia is a treatment that may.

With regards,
Michael Ignatowski, DO
Santokh Sidhu, BA
Marie Rueve, MD
From the Department of Psychiatry, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, Ohio

References

  • 1.Lee JW, Schwartz DL, Hallmeyer J. Catatonia in a psychiatric intensive care facility: Incidence and response to benzodiazepines. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2000;12(2):89–96. doi: 10.1023/a:1009072130267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ignatowski M, Sidhu S, Rueve M. Pulmonary embolism as a complication of major depressive disorder with catatonic features: A case report. Psychiatry. 2007;4(6):51–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Swartz CM, Morrow V, Surles L, James JF. Long-term outcome after ECT for catatonic depression. J ECT. 2001;17(3):180–3. doi: 10.1097/00124509-200109000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Psychiatry (Edgmont) are provided here courtesy of Matrix Medical Communications

RESOURCES