Skip to main content
Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications logoLink to Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications
. 2010 May 27;66(Pt 6):689–692. doi: 10.1107/S1744309110013266

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of Ebola VP35 interferon inhibitory domain mutant proteins

Daisy W Leung a, Dominika Borek b, Mina Farahbakhsh a,c, Parameshwaran Ramanan a,d, Jay C Nix e, Tianjiao Wang a, Kathleen C Prins f, Zbyszek Otwinowski b, Richard B Honzatko a, Luke A Helgeson a,c, Christopher F Basler f, Gaya K Amarasinghe a,*
PMCID: PMC2882771  PMID: 20516601

Three mutant forms of Ebola VP35 interferon inhibitory domain were crystallized in three different space groups.

Keywords: Ebola virus, VP35, interferon inhibitory domain

Abstract

VP35 is one of seven structural proteins encoded by the Ebola viral genome and mediates viral replication, nucleocapsid formation and host immune suppression. The C-terminal interferon inhibitory domain (IID) of VP35 is critical for dsRNA binding and interferon inhibition. The wild-type VP35 IID structure revealed several conserved residues that are important for dsRNA binding and interferon antagonism. Here, the expression, purification and crystallization of recombinant Zaire Ebola VP35 IID mutants R312A, K319A/R322A and K339A in space groups P6122, P212121 and P21, respectively, are described. Diffraction data were collected using synchrotron sources at the Advanced Light Source and the Advanced Photon Source.

1. Introduction

Ebola virus (EBOV) is a member of the Filoviridae family that causes severe hemorrhagic fever, with human fatality rates as high as 90%. Currently, there are no approved treatments or vaccines to treat EBOV infections (Basler & Amarasinghe, 2009; Bray & Geisbert, 2005; Burton & Parren, 2000). Multifunctional viral protein 35 (VP35) is one of seven structural proteins encoded by the 19 kb EBOV genome and plays a critical role in EBOV pathogenesis, including mediating viral replication, nucleocapsid formation and host immune suppression (Basler & Amarasinghe, 2009). Recent studies have shown that the N-terminal region of VP35 is important for oligomerization, while the C-terminal region is required for dsRNA binding and suppression of host immune responses (Basler et al., 2003; Cardenas et al., 2006; Hartman et al., 2004). We recently solved the crystal structure of the VP35 C-terminal interferon inhibitory domain alone and bound to dsRNA (IID; Leung, Ginder, Fulton et al., 2009; Leung, Ginder, Nix et al., 2009; Leung et al., 2010). Analysis of the VP35 IID structure revealed a central patch of basic residues clustered around a highly conserved Arg312 residue (Fig. 1). Mutation of Arg312 and other residues within this basic patch, including Lys319, Arg322 and Lys339, leads to diminished dsRNA binding and IFN inhibition (Cardenas et al., 2006; Hartman et al., 2004; Leung et al., 2010; Prins et al., 2010). How these basic residues mediate dsRNA binding and facilitate EBOV immune evasion is not known. In order to understand the structural basis of how the mutation of these basic residues leads to a loss of dsRNA binding, we initiated studies to characterize the crystal structures of three VP35 IID mutants: R312A, K319A/R322A and K339A. Here, we describe our efforts to express, purify and crystallize each of these VP35 IID mutant proteins as well as our initial X-ray diffraction data-collection efforts.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Multiple sequence alignment of VP35 IID residues 301–340 from Ebola virus strains Zaire (ZEBOV), Reston (REBOV) and Sudan (SEBOV) and Marburg virus. The highly conserved basic residues Arg312, Lys319, Arg322 and Lys339 which are important for dsRNA binding are indicated by asterisks. (b) Residues Arg312, Lys319, Arg322 and Lys339 are located in the β-sheet subdomain of VP35 IID.

2. Methods

2.1. Cloning and expression

PCR products for the VP35 mutants R312A, K319A/R322A and K339A were generated by overlap PCR (Gene ID 911827; Basler et al., 2000) using the coding region for VP35 IID (residues 215–340) from Zaire ebolavirus strain Mayinga as a template. Amplified PCR products were subcloned into a modified pET15b vector (Novagen) which contained a maltose-binding protein (MBP) fusion tag and a tobacco etch virus protease cleavage site 5′ to the multiple cloning site (MCS). Mutations in the resulting vectors were confirmed by sequencing prior to transformation into Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells (Novagen). Transformed cells were cultured in LB medium at 310 K to an optical density of 0.6 at 600 nm and were induced with 0.5 mM IPTG overnight at 291 K for protein expression.

2.2. Protein purification

Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 3000g and 277 K for 30 min. Cells were resuspended in lysis buffer consisting of 25 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0, 1 M NaCl and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and stored at 193 K. Each VP35 IID mutant protein was purified as described previously (Leung, Ginder, Nix et al., 2009). Briefly, cells were thawed and lysed using a cell homogenizer (EmulsiFlex-C5, Avestin) prior to centrifugation at 30 000g and 277 K for 30 min. The supernatant was loaded onto a 15 ml amylose column (XK 26/20, GE Healthcare) and eluted with lysis buffer containing 1% maltose. The eluted protein was diluted to a final NaCl concentration of approximately 50 mM with 25 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.0 and 5 mM β-­mercaptoethanol and was subsequently loaded onto an 8 ml Source 15S column (packed in a Tricorn 10/100 column, GE Healthcare) using buffer SA (25 mM phosphate pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl and 5 mM β-­mercaptoethanol) and eluted with buffer SB (25 mM phosphate pH 7.0, 1 M NaCl and 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol). The MBP fusion tag was removed by incubation with recombinant tobacco etch virus protease for 3–6 h at 277 K. The cleaved VP35 IID mutant proteins were further purified on Source 15S before a final purification step on a Superdex 75 column (10/300 GL, GE Heathcare) with buffer containing 10 mM HEPES pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl and 2 mM TCEP.

2.3. Thermofluor analysis of mutant proteins

The melting temperatures (T m) of the VP35 IID variants were measured by ThermoFluor assay following established protocols (Ericsson et al., 2006; Cummings et al., 2006). In brief, experiments were carried out in a MiniOpticon real-time PCR instrument (Bio-Rad). Measurements were performed using an excitation wavelength of 470–505 nm and an emission wavelength of 540–700 nm. Data were acquired using a temperature gradient from 303 to 363 K in 0.5 K increments. The samples contained 20 µM VP35 IID mutant protein, 1× SYPRO Orange (Invitrogen), 10 mM HEPES pH 7, 150 mM NaCl and 2 mM TCEP. The melting curves represent the fluorescence increase arising from the association of SYPRO Orange with exposed hydrophobic residues as the protein unfolds with increasing temperature. Fluorescence data were analyzed and the temperature corresponding to the derivative peak of the curve represents the melting temperature.

2.4. Crystallization

Preliminary crystallization trials for all three mutant VP35 IID proteins were performed using standard commercial screens (Hampton Research) and were further optimized using reagents generated in-house. Native crystals were grown using the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method at 298 K. Protein solutions in size-exclusion chromatography buffer were diluted in a 1:1 ratio with well solution. Crystals from optimized solutions were initially soaked for 60 s in well solution containing 10%(w/v) glycerol and subsequently soaked for 60 s in well solution containing 25%(w/v) glycerol prior to cryocooling in liquid nitrogen.

2.5. Data collection and processing

Diffraction data for native proteins were collected at the Advanced Light Source (beamline 4.2.2) and at the Advanced Photon Source (beamlines 19-ID and 19-BM) at 100 K on a CCD detector (ADSC Q315 at 19-ID and ADSC Quantum Q210r at 19-BM). For R312A mutant VP35 IID protein, 360 frames were collected at a crystal-to-detector distance of 250 mm using an oscillation range of 0.3°. For K319A/R322A mutant VP35 IID protein, 180 frames were collected at a crystal-to-detector distance of 125 mm using an oscillation range of 1°. For K339A mutant VP35 IID protein, 180 frames were collected at a crystal-to-detector distance of 120 mm using an oscillation range of 1°. Diffraction data were indexed, integrated, scaled and merged using d*TREK (Pflugrath, 1999) or HKL-2000 (Minor et al., 2006). Intensities were converted to structure factors using the CCP4 program TRUNCATE (Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, 1994; French & Wilson, 1978).

3. Results and discussion

The VP35 IID mutants (R312A, K319A/R322A and K339A) were cloned, expressed and purified to homogeneity as assessed by Coomassie staining of SDS–PAGE gels (Fig. 2 a). Analysis of the chromatograms from size-exclusion columns indicated similar elution volumes (12.9 ml for R312A, 12.8 ml for K319A/R322A and 12.6 ml for K339A), suggesting that these proteins retained the hydrodynamic radius of wild-type VP35 IID (Fig. 2 a; Leung, Ginder, Nix et al., 2009). However, ThermoFluor analysis revealed that the mutant VP35 IID proteins have different T m values (Figs. 2 b and 2 c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Biophysical analysis of mutant proteins. (a) Representative chromatograms from analytical size-exclusion columns of VP35 IID mutants R312A (blue), K319A/R322A (red) and K339A (green). The inset shows a Coomassie-stained SDS–PAGE gel of the highly purified final protein samples used in the crystallization trials. Sample order (from left to right) is R312A, K319A/R322A and K339A. (b) Normalized fluorescence emission data for ThermoFluor assays of VP35 IID mutants. Curves are colored as in (a). (c) The derivatives of the data in (b) show differences in T m values for mutant proteins. The T m values for R312A, K319A/R322A and K339A are 330 ± 0.2, 325.3 ± 0.2 and 323.0 ± 0.7 K, respectively. Curves are colored as in (a).

Interestingly, each of the three VP35 IID mutants crystallized under different conditions and belonged to a different space group. Bipyramidal crystals of the VP35 IID R312A mutant protein grew in 1.85 M sodium phosphate/0.15 M potassium phosphate pH 4.15 at a protein concentration of 26 mg ml−1 within 2–3 d to dimensions of 100 µm in length and about 60 µm at the thickest area (Fig. 3 a). R312A mutant crystals diffracted to 1.95 Å resolution and belonged to space group P6122 (Table 1). The Matthews coefficient was 2.94 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to 58% solvent content and four molecules per asymmetric unit. Plate-shaped crystals of VP35 IID K319A/R322A mutant protein grew in 0.1 M bis-tris pH 6.75, 0.2 M ammonium sulfate and 28% PEG 3350 at a protein concentration of 7 mg ml−1 after 1 d to dimensions of 100 × 50 × 20 µm (Fig. 3 b). K319A/R322A mutant crystals belonged to space group P212121 and diffracted to 1.7 Å resolution (Table 1). The Matthews coefficient was 2.2 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to 44% solvent content and two molecules per asymmetric unit. Cubic crystals of VP35 IID K339A mutant appeared in 1–2 d after equilibration against 0.1 M sodium citrate pH 2.8, 0.3 M lithium sulfate and 13% PEG 8000 with 10 mg ml−1 protein. The crystals had dimensions of 200 × 200 × 150 µm and diffracted to a resolution of 2.4 Å (Fig. 3 c). These crystals belonged to space group P21 (Table 1). The Matthews coefficient was 2.95 Å3 Da−1, corresponding to 58% solvent content and six molecules per asymmetric unit. Data-collection statistics for all three mutant VP35 IID proteins are summarized in Table 1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative crystals of VP35 IID mutants. (a) R312A (approximate dimensions 30 × 30 × 100 µm), (b) K319A/R322A (approximate dimensions 100 × 50 × 20 µm) and (c) K339A (approximate dimensions 200 × 200 × 150 µm).

Table 1. Data collection for mutant VP35 IID proteins.

Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.

  VP35 IID
  R312A K319A/R322A K339A
Space group P6122 P212121 P21
Unit-cell parameters (Å, °) a = b = 81.55, c = 343.50, α = β = 90, γ = 120 a = 51.43, b = 66.07, c = 72.64, α = β = γ = 90 a = 53.39, b = 91.88, c = 102.69, α = γ = 90, β = 99.60
Wavelength (Å) 0.979 0.979 0.979
Resolution (Å) 40.49–1.95 (1.97–1.95) 36.32–1.70 (1.76–1.70) 50.00–2.40 (2.44–2.40)
Rmerge (%) 9.2 (n/a) 8.9 (58.5) 4.4 (43.3)
Average I/σ(I) 27.0 (2.3) 9.4 (2.8) 29.0 (2.8)
Completeness (%) 99.6 (100.0) 97.5 (88.3) 99.8 (100.0)
Multiplicity of observation 11.4 (10.7) 6.34 (4.96) 3.8 (3.7)

R merge = Inline graphic Inline graphic, where i runs over multiple observations of the same intensity and hkl runs over all crystallographically unique intensities.

If R merge exceeds 1.0, SCALEPACK does not report its value because it is uninformative. Instead, the I/σ(I) criterion is used to define resolution cutoff.

All three mutants of VP35 IID displayed diminished dsRNA binding and interferon inhibition without affecting the structural integrity of the protein (Cardenas et al., 2006; Leung et al., 2010; Prins et al., 2010). Interestingly, all four residues that we mutated are surface residues with high degrees of conformational flexibility (Lys and Arg) and their mutation to alanine would result in surface-entropy reduction (Cieślik & Derewenda, 2009; Derewenda & Vekilov, 2006). Identification of these residues for further analysis was primarily based on their sequence conservation and their location within the central basic patch, which we have recently shown to be important for interferon inhibition. Analysis of these mutant structures will provide insight into structural and mechanistic aspects of Ebola VP35-mediated circumvention of the host immune response. Additional analysis of the crystal contacts of these structures will provide correlations between surface conformational entropy and crystal lattice formation. These efforts will be reported shortly.

Acknowledgments

We thank ISU Biotechnology Facilities and Dr J. Hoy for providing access to instrumentation. We thank L. Tantral, C. Brown and D. Peterson for laboratory assistance and Drs. S. Ginell, N. Duke, F. Rotella, M. Cuff and J. Lazarz at APS Sector 19. Use of Argonne National Laboratory Structural Biology Center beamlines at the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US DOE under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. This work was supported by NIH grants [1F32AI084324 to DWL, R01GM053163 to ZO, R01NS010546 to RBH, R01AI059536 and AI057158 (Northeast Biodefense Center-Lipkin) to CFB and R01AI081914 to GKA], an MRCE Developmental Grant [U54AI057160-Virgin(PI) to GKA] and the Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust (09-3271 to GKA).

References

  1. Basler, C. F. & Amarasinghe, G. K. (2009). J. Interferon Cytokine Res.29, 511–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  2. Basler, C. F., Mikulasova, A., Martinez-Sobrido, L., Paragas, J., Muhlberger, E., Bray, M., Klenk, H. D., Palese, P. & Garcia-Sastre, A. (2003). J. Virol.77, 7945–7956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Basler, C. F., Wang, X., Muhlberger, E., Volchkov, V., Paragas, J., Klenk, H. D., Garcia-Sastre, A. & Palese, P. (2000). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 12289-12294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  4. Bray, M. & Geisbert, T. W. (2005). Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.37, 1560–1566. [DOI] [PubMed]
  5. Burton, D. R. & Parren, P. W. (2000). Nature (London), 408, 527–528. [DOI] [PubMed]
  6. Cardenas, W. B., Loo, Y. M., Gale, M. Jr, Hartman, A. L., Kimberlin, C. R., Martinez-Sobrido, L., Saphire, E. O. & Basler, C. F. (2006). J. Virol.80, 5168–5178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  7. Cieślik, M. & Derewenda, Z. S. (2009). Acta Cryst. D65, 500–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  8. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4 (1994). Acta Cryst. D50, 760–763.
  9. Cummings, M. D., Farnum, M. A. & Nelen, M. I. (2006). J. Biomol. Screen.11, 854–863. [DOI] [PubMed]
  10. Derewenda, Z. S. & Vekilov, P. G. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 116–124. [DOI] [PubMed]
  11. Ericsson, U. B., Hallberg, B. M., Detitta, G. T., Dekker, N. & Nordlund, P. (2006). Anal. Biochem.357, 289–298. [DOI] [PubMed]
  12. French, S. & Wilson, K. (1978). Acta Cryst. A34, 517–525.
  13. Hartman, A. L., Towner, J. S. & Nichol, S. T. (2004). Virology, 328, 177–184. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Leung, D. W., Ginder, N. D., Fulton, D. B., Nix, J., Basler, C. F., Honzatko, R. B. & Amarasinghe, G. K. (2009). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 411–416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Leung, D. W., Ginder, N. D., Nix, J. C., Basler, C. F., Honzatko, R. B. & Amarasinghe, G. K. (2009). Acta Cryst. F65, 163–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. Leung, D. W., Prins, K. C., Borek, D. M., Farahbakhsh, M., Tufariello, J. M., Ramanan, P., Nix, J. C., Helgeson, L. A., Otwinowski, Z., Honzatko, R. B., Basler, C. F. & Amarasinghe, G. K. (2010). Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.17, 165–172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Minor, W., Cymborowski, M., Otwinowski, Z. & Chruszcz, M. (2006). Acta Cryst. D62, 859–866. [DOI] [PubMed]
  18. Pflugrath, J. W. (1999). Acta Cryst. D55, 1718–1725. [DOI] [PubMed]
  19. Prins, K. C., Delpeut, S., Leung, D. W., Reynard, O., Volchkova, V. A., Reid, S. P., Ramanan, P., Cardenas, W. B., Amarasinghe, G. K., Volchkov, V. E. & Basler, C. F. (2010). J. Virol.84, 3004–3015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Acta Crystallographica Section F: Structural Biology and Crystallization Communications are provided here courtesy of International Union of Crystallography

RESOURCES