Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 17.
Published in final edited form as: Chembiochem. 2010 May 17;11(8):1066–1068. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200900690

A Genetically Encoded ε-N-methyl Lysine in Mammalian Cells

Dan Groff a,+, Peng R Chen b,+, Francis B Peters a,+, Peter G Schultz a
PMCID: PMC2882943  NIHMSID: NIHMS209177  PMID: 20422671

The posttranslational methylation of lysine modulates the activity, stability, localization and biomolecular interactions of many eukaryotic proteins. For example, monomethylation of lysine 372 in the mammalian tumor suppressor p53 has been shown to affect protein stability and localization[1]. Protein methylation plays a particularly important role in gene expression due to its involvement in the histone code, in which specific modifications to histone proteins modulate the transcriptional status of specific genes. Methylation of distinct histone lysine residues has been correlated with both transcriptional activation and repression depending on the lysine modified.[2] To better understand the functional consequences of lysine methylation, methods are needed to generate proteins with defined methylation status both in vitro and in living cells.

One straight forward in vitro method for lysine methylation makes use of methyltransferase enzymes,[3] which transfer the S-methyl group of the cofactor S-adenosyl methionine to the side chains of lysine and arginine. These enzymes have very specific sequence requirements, and they can lead to heterogeneous mixtures of methylation products.[4] To circumvent these limitations, one can use solid phase peptide synthesis to directly incorporate methylated lysine residues into full length proteins by native chemical ligation.[5] In addition, in vitro translation has been adapted for the production of histone tails with multiple modified lysine residues.[6] However, these method can suffer from low yields, restrictions on the site of modification, and are not easily adapted to cellular studies. Recently, an in vitro chemical modification strategy was developed that takes advantage of the unique reactivity of cysteine. The reaction between cysteine and N-methyl aminoethylhalides generates a thioether adduct structurally similar to methyl lysine. Mono-, di- and tri-methylated lysine analogs have been generated in this way.[7] Using a similar strategy, unnatural amino acid mutagenesis was used to selectively incorporate into proteins phenylselenocysteine, which can be subsequently oxidized to dehydroalanine, and reacted with aminoethylthiols to again produce methyl lysine analogues. However, an initial oxidation step is required, so this strategy is not compatible with proteins containing redox active cysteine or methionine residues.[8]

Biosynthetic approaches have also been used to incorporate methyl lysine into proteins. For example, the ε-methyl lysine precursor Nε -tert-butyl-oxycarbonyl Nε -methyl-L-lysine (Boc methyl lysine) has been genetically inserted into proteins in E. coli. This strategy produces good yields of homogeneously monomethylated proteins largely independent of sequence context.[4] However, Boc deprotection in aqueous TFA is necessary to generate monomethyl lysine, and can cause denaturation and loss of biological activity with many proteins.[9]

All of the above methods for introducing methyl lysine require in vitro manipulation to produce the final, methylated protein.

This restriction generally prevents studies of methylated proteins in their native cellular context. To overcome this limitation, we have genetically encoded the photocaged N-methyl lysine, Nε-o-nitrobenzyl-oxycarbonyl-Nε-methyl-L-lysine 1, in both bacteria and mammalian cells. Photocaged second messengers and proteins are widely used tools for the spatial and temporal control of a variety of cellular processes because light allows non-invasive generation of the active photoproducts in the cell. Furthermore, it has been previously demonstrated that o-nitrobenzyl-O-tyrosine and dimethoxy-o-nitrobenzyl-O-serine can be efficiently deprotected with light in E. coli,[10] Xenopus oocytes[11] and yeast[12].

The synthesis of photocaged methyl lysine 1 involves two sequential reductive aminations of Nα-tert-butyl-oxycarbonyl-L-lysine with benzaldehyde and formaldehyde using STABH to afford Nα -tert-butyl-oxycarbonyl-Nε-benzyl-Nε-methyl-L-lysine in 89% purified yield[13]. Reductive debenzylation quantitatively yielded Nα-tert-butyl-oxycarbonyl-Nε-methyl-L-lysine 4 which was then coupled to o-nitrobenzyl chloroformate to produce 5 in 28% yield. Boc deprotection proceeded quantitatively with HCl in dioxane to generate photocaged methyl lysine 1. To genetically encode 1, we used a pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase from M. barkeri (MbPylRS) and a pyrrolysyl tRNA (tRNACUAPyl)from M. mazei[14] which previously were adapted for the site-specific incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins in response to the amber nonsense codon TAG.[1517] The orthogonality of this pair to endogenous tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) has been demonstrated in both E. coli and mammalian cells so that an aaRS evolved to incorporate the unnatural amino acid Nεo-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl-L-lysine in E. coli can also be used in mammalian cells. An aaRS library was created in E. coli in which the codons for residues L270, Y271, L274 and C313 of the pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase from M. barkeri were all randomized as NNK. Directed evolution with 2 positive rounds and 1 negative round[18] of selection as previously described resulted in the identification of the aaRS G12 (experimental details in supplemental information) which is capable of incorporating 1 into proteins. aaRS G12 has the following mutations: Y271I, L274M, and C313A.

To determine the fidelity and efficiency with which 1 can be incorporated into proteins in E. coli, a myoglobin gene with an amber mutation at codon 99 and a C-terminal 6-His Tag was expressed in the presence of the G12 aaRS/ tRNACUAPyl pair and 1. In the absence of unnatural amino acid, no full length myoglobin was evident by SDS-PAGE analysis. In Terrific Broth media supplemented with 1 mM 1, the yield of mutant protein was 4.2 mg protein/L (see figure 1a), compared to yields of around 1 mg/L for protein expressed with the WT pyrrolysine synthetase and the pyrrolysine analog Nε-cyclopentyloxycarbonyl-L-lysine[15] and 2 mg/L for Myo4TAG suppressed with tRNACUAPyl and the WT tyrosyl aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase from M. jannaschii.[16] To confirm incorporation of 1 at position 99, the mutant myoglobin was purified with nickel affinity chromatography and then subjected to electrospray mass spectral analysis. For protein expressed in the presence of 1, mass peaks of 18540 Da corresponding to the photocaged methyl lysine mutant, 18408 Da corresponding to the methyl lysine mutant with an additional acetylation, and 18351 Da corresponding to the lysine mutant were present (see figure 1a). The methyl lysine mutant is likely due to enzymatic degradation of the nitrobenzyl carbamate moeity, which has been observed previously.[15] The lysine mutant may result from demethylation of methyl lysine; it was not observed in the mass spectrum when protein is expressed in the absence of 1, demonstrating that this peak is not due to misincorporation of lysine at this position.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photocaged methyl lysine can be incorporated into proteins with high fidelity in E. coli.using the G12 aaRs/ tRNACUAPyl pair. a) E. coli amber suppression of Myo99TAG in Terrific Broth. Left lane: protein expressed without 1. Right lane: protein expressed with 1 mM 1. b) Electrospray mass spectrum of TAG99→1 Myo mutant.

Next we determined if the G12 aaRS/ tRNACUAPyl pair could be used to selectively incorporate photocaged methyl lysine into proteins in mammalian cells. The genes encoding G12 and tRNACUAPyl were introduced into the mammalian vector pCMV, hereafter designated pCMV-G12, with the G12 gene under control of a constitutive CMV promoter and a single tRNACUAPyl under control of a human U6 promoter.[15] Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were transiently transfected with vector pCMV-G12 and a reporter plasmid containing the eGFP gene with codon 37 mutated to TAG and a C-terminal 6-His Tag. CHO cells grown in media lacking 1 exhibited no visible fluorescence, whereas cells grown in media with 1 mM 1 produced a bright GFP signal (see figure 2a). This was further verified with an anti-His6 western blot (figure 2b) indicating that full length protein was produced only in the presence of photocaged methyl lysine 1. Finally, to verify that the protein contained only photocaged methyl lysine, 21 μg of protein was isolated by nickel affinity chromatography from 2.2 ×107 CHO cells. Electrospray mass spectral analysis showed the presence of only 1 peak at 29840 m/z (see figure 2c) corresponding to the eGFP37TAG→1 mutant (calculated mass = 29841). In addition, the lack of peaks corresponding to N-methyl lysine, lysine or additional acetylation further support the hypothesis that these modifications in E. coli result from enzymes not present in mammalian cells. To verify that this peak represents photocaged methyl lysine, protein was subjected to photolysis for 20 minutes with ≥365 nm light, an irradiation regime demonstrated to be safe for use with mammalian cells.[19] Subsequent mass spectral analysis showed quantitative conversion to a protein with mass 29663, 177 mass units lighter, corresponding to the loss of 1 o-nitrobenzyloxycarbonyl group. To demonstrate that methyl lysine can be liberated in living cells, eGFP37→1 was photolyzed in CHO cells. The previous experiment was repeated with irradiation before cell lysis and protein purification. Two peaks are evident in the mass spectrum, a small peak at 29845 m/z corresponding to eGFP containing 1, and a major peak at 29662 m/z corresponding to photolyzed eGFP containing methyl lysine at position 37.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Photocaged methyl lysine 1 can be incorporated into proteins with high fidelity in mammalian cells. a) CHO expression of eGFP73TAG transfected with pCMV-G12 imaged with fluorescence microscopy: top - cells supplemented with 1 mM 1; bottom- no unnatural amino acid. b) Western blot analysis of eGFP37TAG→1 mutant expression probed with anti-His6 antibody. c) Electrospray mass spectrum of eGFP37TAG→1 mutant protein purified using nickel affinity chromotography : top - before irradiation; middle – after irradiation ≥ 365 nm for 20 min; bottom – irradiation in CHO cells ≥ 365 nm for 60 min.

In conclusion, we have shown that N-methyl lysine can be efficiently incorporated into proteins in both E. coli and mammalian cells with high fidelity. Although additional effort is necessary to produce homogenously methylated proteins in E. coli, this system is capable of introducing photocaged methyl lysine site specifically into proteins in mammalian cells. In addition, we demonstrated that the caging group can be removed in living cells to produce homogeneously methylated proteins. This method will be a useful tool in understanding the role of monomethylation in a variety of biological processes.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Information

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of photocaged methyl lysine 1. a. benzaldehyde and STABH followed by formaldehyde and STABH b. H2 with palladium/carbon c. o-nitrobenzyl choloformate d. 4 N HCl/Dioxanes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grants R01GM62159 and PN22EY01 (P.G.S.).

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://www.chembiochem.org or from the author.

References

  • [1].Chuikov S, Kurash JK, Wilson JR, Xiao B, Justin N, Ivanov GS, McKinney K, Tempst P, Prives C, Gamblin SJ, Barlev NA, Reinberg D. Nature. 2004;432:353. doi: 10.1038/nature03117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Hublitz P, Albert M, Peters AH. Int J Dev Biol. 2009;53:335. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.082717ph. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Martino F, Kueng S, Robinson P, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, van Leeuwen F, Ziegler M, Cubizolles F, Cockell MM, Rhodes D, Gasser SM. Mol Cell. 2009;33:323. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Nguyen DP, Alai MM, Kapadnis PB, Neumann H, Chin JW. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:14194. doi: 10.1021/ja906603s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].He S, Bauman D, Davis JS, Loyola A, Nishioka K, Gronlund JL, Reinberg D, Meng F, Kelleher N, McCafferty DG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:12033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2035256100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Kang TJ, Yuzawa S, Suga H. Chemistry and Biology. 2008;15:1166. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Simon MD, Chu F, Racki LR, de la Cruz CC, Burlingame AL, Panning B, Narlikar GJ, Shokat KM. Cell. 2007;128:1003. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Guo J, Wang J, Lee JS, Schultz PG. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47:6399. doi: 10.1002/anie.200802336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Kanazawa H, Nishikawa M, Mizutani A, Sakamoto C, Morita-Murase Y, Nagata Y, Kikuchi A, Okano T. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1191:157. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Deiters A, Groff D, Ryu Y, Xie J, Schultz PG. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2006;45:2728. doi: 10.1002/anie.200600264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Philipson KD, Gallivan JP, Brandt GS, Dougherty DA, Lester HA. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;281:C195. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.281.1.C195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Lemke EA, Summerer D, Geierstanger BH, Brittain SM, Schultz PG. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3:769. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Huang Z-P, Su X-Y, Du J-T, Zhao Y-F, Li Y-M. Tetrahedron Letters. 2006;47:5997. [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Srinivasan G, James CM, Krzycki JA. Science. 2002;296:1459. doi: 10.1126/science.1069588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Chen PR, Groff D, Guo J, Ou W, Cellitti S, Geierstanger BH, Schultz PG. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48:4052. doi: 10.1002/anie.200900683. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Neumann H, Peak-Chew SY, Chin JW. Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:232. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Mukai T, Kobayashi T, Hino N, Yanagisawa T, Sakamoto K, Yokoyama S. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;371:818. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.04.164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Wang L, Brock A, Herberich B, Schultz PG. Science. 2001;292:498. doi: 10.1126/science.1060077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Edwards WF, Young DD, Deiters A. ACS Chem Biol. 2009;4:441. doi: 10.1021/cb900041s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information

RESOURCES