Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2010 Jan;19(1):79–84. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283331e50

Susceptibility genes in common complex kidney disease

Jasmin Divers 1, Barry I Freedman 2
PMCID: PMC2883259  NIHMSID: NIHMS203526  PMID: 19838113

Abstract

Purpose of review

This manuscript reviews recent efforts to identify genetic variants conferring risk for chronic kidney disease (CKD). A brief overview of methods for identifying gene variants is provided, along with genetic associations and new avenues under exploration.

Recent findings

The role of renal failure susceptibility genes including MYH9, ELMO1, UMOD and ACTN4 has become clearer over the last 18 months. The spectrum of MYH9-associated kidney disease including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), global glomerulosclerosis and collapsing glomerulopathy, related entities contributing to approximately 43% of end-stage renal disease in African Americans, has come to light.

Summary

MYH9 will re-categorize FSGS and related disorders, and has clarified the relationship between hypertension and kidney disease. MYH9 polymorphisms account for much of the excess risk of HIV-associated nephropathy and non-diabetic kidney disease in African Americans. Kidney disease associations with ELMO1 and UMOD have been replicated and applications of genome-wide association studies based on expression data are providing novel insights on renal protein expression. These breakthroughs will alter our approach to kidney disease surveillance and lead to new therapeutic options.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus, ELMO1, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, genetics, kidney disease, MYH9

Introduction

Improvements in genotyping, computing and statistical analysis now make it possible to scan the entire genome using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and apply novel methods such as mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium (MALD) and genome-wide association study (GWAS) to detect chronic kidney disease (CKD) genes. This paper reviews newer genetic methodologies and recently detected genes causing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), collapsing glomerulopathy, global glomerulosclerosis (historically labeled “hypertensive nephrosclerosis”) and diabetes-associated nephropathy. These findings will allow for pre-symptomatic disease screening and potentially intervention in novel pathways to prevent or slow progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

1. Approaches to identifying nephropathy genes

Linkage analysis systematically scans the genome of affected individuals in families using highly polymorphic markers (microsatellite repeat polymorphisms or SNPs) with known genomic positions [1]. Linkage relies on the fact that the shorter the distance between genetic variants the more likely they are to be co-inherited. Genetic regions harboring nephropathy risk variants can be identified by observing that affected family members tend to share the same marker variants (alleles) in the same genomic region more frequently than expected by chance. Families are often limited to sibling pairs or two-generations due to the late age at nephropathy onset, thus requiring greater number of families than would be the case for early onset diseases. Linkage studies are difficult and expensive due to the need to recruit large numbers of informative families. Moreover, linkage has poor resolution requiring additional efforts to refine locations of disease variants using genetic association studies (GAS).

GAS can detect genetic variants either associated with the trait of interest or in linkage disequilibrium with an untyped variant. This approach can detect smaller effect sizes than what is feasible with linkage analysis. However, association studies in unrelated individuals are vulnerable to confounding by population stratification or admixture and even after controlling for these effects; identification of causative genes still depends on the presence of relatively common risk allele frequencies [2-5].

It is now possible to perform association analyses using upwards of 1 million SNP markers. From a methodologic standpoint, GWAS are no different than traditional GAS; except the sheer amount of data creates computational challenges and raises additional statistical concerns. For example, special software to manipulate the collected data and conduct the analysis had to be developed [6;7], and the effect of statistical effects such as the “winner's curse” are magnified [8].

MALD is the first post-linkage methodology that interrogates the whole genome for disease association. It relies on the premise that if the prevalence of a disease is higher in one ancestral population than another, it will be easier to identify causative variants in the admixed population than in either parental population alone [9;10]. African Americans are an admixed population, resulting from intermating between individuals of African and European descent. A panel of ancestry informative markers (AIMs), which are markers whose alleles are differentially distributed in the ancestral populations, is needed to conduct MALD analyses and panels were developed for African Americans [11] and Hispanic Americans [12]. This approach is a cost-efficient compromise between whole genome linkage analyses and more expensive GWAS [13]. MALD identified the non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 (MYH9) gene underlying susceptibility to non-diabetic and diabetic ESRD in African Americans. The following sections review gene associations in diabetes-associated nephropathy (DN), non diabetes-associated nephropathies and genes modulating renal function in general populations.

2. Diabetes-associated nephropathy (DN)

Diabetes mellitus is a heterogeneous disorder with variable degrees of insulin resistance and deficiency contributing to hyperglycemia. Several genes have been implicated in DN. SNPs in a non-coding region of chromosome 3q22 are strongly associated with type 1 DN in Europeans [14] and a discordant sib pair analysis confirmed prior associations between type 1 DN and regions on 1q, 20p and 3q [15*]. Associations between DN and promoter polymorphisms in the erythropoietin gene (EPO) [16*] and variants in the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) have been identified [17].

A GWAS was performed in Genetics of Kidneys in Diabetes (GoKinD) participants and replicated in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Intervention and Complications. These European Americans cohorts with type 1 diabetes revealed association with loci near the 4.1 protein ezrin, radixin, moesin (FERM) domain containing 3 (FRMD3) gene and the cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CARS) gene [18*]. Association p-values barely missed genome-wide significance. We focus on 4 replicated DN susceptibility genes, below.

2.1 Plasmacytoma variant translocation (PVT1) gene

PVT1 was found to be associated with type 2 DN in Pima Indians using a pooled GWAS in small numbers of cases and controls [19]. Replication in Europeans with type 1 diabetes-associated ESRD was detected in GoKinD [20]. The associated PVT1 SNP rs13447075 is located within the coding region of a transcript variant and this isoform was expressed in human mesangial, cortical epithelial, epithelial, and proximal tubule cells, suggesting a role in pathogenesis.

2.2 Engulfment and Cell Motility 1 (ELMO1) gene

ELMO1, involved in phagocytosis of dying cells, is required for cell migration and alteration in cell shape [21]. Several variants in this large gene are associated with type 2 DN. Disease association was originally detected in a Japanese sample using GWAS [22], replicated in African Americans [23] and further replicated in European Americans with type 1 DN [24]. As for PVT1, nephropathy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes clusters in single families and may share common predisposition. ELMO1 expression is increased in an animal model of chronic glomerulonephritis, resulting in over expression of extracellular matrix proteins and loss of cell adhesive properties [25]. Polymorphisms in different regions of ELMO1 are associated with DN in select ethnic groups: intron 18 in Japanese, intron 13 in African Americans, and predominantly intron 16 in European Americans; however, different polymorphisms appear to produce a common DN phenotype.

2.3 Carnosinase 1 and Carnosinase 2 (CNDP1 and CNDP2) genes

The protein encoded by CNDP1 on chromosome 18q is expressed in the brain and kidney. Consistent evidence of linkage to 18q strongly supported the existence of a DN gene in this region. [26-28]. Involvement of CNDP1 in DN was detected by the Mannheim group [29]. Association has since been replicated in European Americans with type 2 DN [30], but not in type 1 DN [31]. The 5 leucine-5 leucine (5L-5L) gene variant is protective against DN in an autosomal recessive fashion. Cos-7 cells transfected with the 5L variant secreted less carnosinase than did cells expressing 6L or 7L, demonstrating that this hydrophobic leucine stretch was of importance for targeting the protein into the secretory pathway [32]. Carnosine is a scavenger of oxygen free radicals, inhibits formation of advanced glycosylation end-products and inhibits TGFβ production. Individuals who are CNDP1 5L-5L homozygotes secrete less carnosinase and are expected to have higher carnosine levels with protection from DN. Protection from DN afforded by 5L-5L homozygosity in CNDP1 appears to be masked by the effects of additional CNDP1 and CNDP2 haplotypes in African Americans [33].

2.4 Endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene

Proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis result in animals treated with chronic nitric oxide blockade [34]. The T-786C polymorphism in eNOS reduces gene promoter activity and is associated with coronary disease [35]. eNOS3 associations have widely been observed in progressive DN [36-40]].

3. Non-diabetic nephropathy

FSGS is a common pattern of kidney injury disproportionately affecting African Americans and often leading to ESRD. Several gene variants were known to be associated with FSGS; however, they failed to account for the majority of adult cases until detection of the non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene (MYH9). In addition, microRNAs appear to be involved in the development of glomerulosclerosis [41] and DN [42].

3.1 Non-muscle heavy chain 9 (MYH9) gene

MYH9 is a podocyte-expressed gene encoding nonmuscle myosin IIA. This gene contributes to approximately 43% of ESRD in African Americans, playing major roles in idiopathic FSGS, human immunodeficiency virus-associated nephropathy (HIVAN), and global glomerulosclerosis (historically labeled “hypertensive ESRD”). Kopp et al. [43**] and Kao et al. [44**] identified MYH9 variants associated with ESRD in independent African American samples. Kopp reported the MYH9 E1 haplotype conferred an odds ratio of 4.7 for idiopathic FSGS and 5.9 for HIVAN. The E1 haplotype is present in 60% of African-Americans, compared to 4% of European-Americans. Kao et al. estimated that the prevalence of ESRD would be reduced by 70% if African Americans had inherited European ancestry at the MYH9 locus. We [45] demonstrated that MYH9 variants were weakly associated with albuminuria in hypertensive African-American, but strongly associated with ESRD previously thought due to hypertension [46**;47]. Global glomerulosclerosis in African Americans, historically labeled “hypertensive nephrosclerosis”, is predominantly MYH9-associated and in the spectrum of FSGS [48]. Linkage was detected on chromosome 22q13 in Europeans with CKD, in the genomic region of MYH9 [49]. MYH9 also contributed to 16% of clinically diagnosed type 2 DN in African Americans [50]. MYH9 polymorphisms underlie most of the excess risk for non-diabetic ESRD in African Americans relative to European Americans and will force re-classification of the spectrum of FSGS/global glomerulosclerosis. Possible mechanisms whereby MYH9 may induce CKD include podocyte cytoskeletal abnormalities resulting from improper actin movement or platelet dysfunction as seen in May Hegglin anomaly [51]. Chromogranin A (CHGA) gene polymorphisms also contribute to hypertension-associated ESRD in African Americans [52*]. The effects of CHGA may be mediated via endothelin and TGFβ1, released by endothelial and mesangial cells [53*].

3.2 Nephrosis homolog (NPHS) gene family

Three genes in the NPHS family are associated with CKD. Mitochondrial DNA tRNA leucine nephrin-(NPHS1) endoding nephrin, a transmembrane adhesion molecule localizing to signaling domains within the slit diaphragm of the podocyte, modulate urinary protein excretion. Mutations are associated with congenital nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type [54]. Other variants are associated with glomerulosclerosis and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children of European [55;56] and Japanese descent [57].

NPHS2 on chromosome 1q25-q31 encodes the glomerular protein podocin, involved in regulation of glomerular permeability [58]. Mutations in NPHS2 are frequently observed in childhood SRNS and a variant are implicated in recurrence of proteinuria after kidney transplantation [59]. Phospholipase C epsilon 1 (PLCE1), also labeled NPHS3, is associated with diffuse mesangial sclerosis, an idiopathic childhood renal disease that frequently progresses to ESRD [60]. Other genes causing Mendelian forms of FSGS include alpha-actinin 4 (ACTN4), transient receptor potential cation channel 6 (TRPC6), CD2-associated protein- (CD2AP), and Wilm's Tumor-1 (WT1) [61-64]. ACTN4 polymorphisms confer a distinctive phenotype [65*].

3.3 HIV-associated nephropathy

Without antiretroviral therapy, HIVAN can be an aggressive kidney disease in African Americans. HIVAN is a variant of FSGS characterized by the collapse of the glomerular tuft with podocyte hypertrophy and hyperplasia [66]. In addition to MYH9, genes involved include CCR5 (promoter region and delta 32 deletion), the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), CCR2-V64I, SDF-1, a copy number polymorphism CCL3L1, RANTES and various HLA types [67;68]. Variants in the chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5, a receptor for pro-inflammatory chemokines, have been associated kidney disease and kidney transplant acute rejection [69], while others have shown protection from inflammation-associated mortality in dialysis patients [70].

It is likely that second hits, gene-gene and/or gene-environment interactions, are necessary to induce HIVAN. Papeta et al. [71**] demonstrated that transcript levels of NPHS2 and other podocyte-expressed genes function in integrated fashions and gene polymorphisms induced by susceptibility to HIVAN appear to perturb regulatory pathways inducing collapsing FSGS.

4. Genes regulating renal function in the general population

UMOD encodes uromodulin or Tamm-Horsfall protein, the most abundant protein in normal urine. Involvement of this gene in kidney function was suggested by a linkage peak on chromosome 16p [72;73]. UMOD mutations are associated with the spectrum of medullary cystic kidney disease type 2, familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy, and glomerulocystic kidney disease [74. Benetti [75] identified a UMOD variant (NM_003361.2:c.149G→C; p.Cys50Ser) associated with absence of urinary uromodulin excretion and Köttgen et al. [76**] found that SNP rs12917707 near UMOD demonstrated strong association with CKD (p-value 5×10-16) in a GWAS, as well as implicated SHROOM3 (involved in epithelial cell shape regulation), JAG1 and STC1 as associated with CKD. These studies were conducted in individuals of European descent. TCF7L2 gene polymorphism, strongly associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus, may also play a role in the progression of non-diabetic nephropathies [77]. In Japanese populations, UMOD variants were associated with hypertension [78] and MMP1 and UCP2 were associated with CKD [79] (see Table).

Table 1.

Genes associated with diabetic nephropathy, non-diabetic nephropathy and regulation of renal function (with relevant references)

Diabetic Nephropathy Non-diabetic nephropathies Regulation of renal function
EPO [16] MYH9 [43-50] UMOD [74-76]
SOD1 [17] NPHS1 [54,57] SHROOM3, JAG1 and STC1[76]
CARS [18] CHGA [52-53] TCF7L2 [77]
PVT1 [19-20] NPHS2 [58-59] MMP1 and UCP2 [79]
ELMO1 [22-24] PLCE1 [60]
CNDP1, CNDP2 [29-33] ACTN4 [61,65]
eNOS [36-40] TRPC6 [63]

5. Role of refined phenotypes in CKD gene mapping

A key component in the success of any genetic study is appropriate definition of phenotypes. Phenotypic data should be subjected to the same levels of quality control as genotypic data, since poorly defined phenotypes lead to loss of power and inability to replicate findings. Biomarkers or endophenotypes, defined as clinical entities closer to the underlying biology than mere disease-associated symptoms, can be valuables tools in gene mapping. Variation in gene expression offers valuable insight into mechanisms underlying susceptibility to complex disease. Recently, traditional gene mapping strategies including linkage and association have been applied to gene expression data by treating them as outcome (quantitative or expression quantitative trait loci; eQTL) variables [80]. eQTLs are heritable [81] and can lead to significant gain in power when used in association analysis with SNPs [82]. The potential for these refined phenotypes to map CKD genes has been demonstrated. Ju et al. [83*] showed that protein expression, a subcomponent of gene expression, predicts progressive renal fibrosis in mice and may be useful molecular predictors of human CKD progression. Murphy et al. [84] applied differential gene expression technologies to describe the role of proteins such as CTGF, which acts as a mediator of TGF-β1-driven matrix production within the diabetic kidney and Gremlin, whose expression level in kidney biopsies in DN patients is higher than that observed in normal kidney.

6. Future directions

Despite initial enthusiasm for MALD and current interest in GWAS, the variants that these methods identified only account for a small fraction of the heritability of most common traits. This suggests that consideration must be given to other sources of variation including gene-gene [85] and gene-environment interactions [86], as well as copy number variation (CNV) [87], in addition to improving statistical methods addressing lack of power, phenotypic and population heterogeneity and multiple testing. There is also a need to develop more efficient ways to combine data from sources such as gene expression and GWAS data. These efforts are underway, as reviewed by Nica and Dermitzakis [88].

7. Conclusions

It has now been proven that susceptibility to DN and non-diabetic nephropathy is partly mediated by genetic predisposition. MYH9 is an important nephropathy susceptibility gene underlying 43% of diverse forms of severe kidney disease in African Americans. Approximately 4% (for idiopathic FSGS) to 20% (for HIVAN) of African Americans inheriting two MYH9 risk variants may develop nephropathy. Additional genes reveal strong and reliable association with diabetic nephropathy. Screening tests and novel therapies derived from these genetic associations may offer new hope for slowing the worldwide epidemic of kidney disease.

Footnotes

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the last year of review, have been highlighted as:

*: Paper of special interest

**: Paper of greater interest

  • 1.Feingold E. Methods for Linkage Analysis of Quantitative Trait Loci in Humans. Theor Popul Biol. 2001;60:167–180. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Pritchard JK, Donnelly P. Case-control studies of association in structured or admixed populations. Theor Popul Biol. 2001;60:227–237. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Devlin B, Roeder K, Wasserman L. Genomic control, a new approach to genetic-based association studies. Theor Popul Biol. 2001;60:155–166. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2001.1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Tian C, Plenge RM, Ransom M, et al. Analysis and application of European genetic substructure using 300 K SNP information. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, et al. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:904–909. doi: 10.1038/ng1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, et al. PLINK: A Tool Set for Whole-Genome Association and Population-Based Linkage Analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–575. doi: 10.1086/519795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, et al. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1294–1296. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zollner S, Pritchard JK. Overcoming the winner's curse: estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:605–615. doi: 10.1086/512821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Montana G, Pritchard JK. Statistical tests for admixture mapping with case-control and cases-only data. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;75:771–789. doi: 10.1086/425281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McKeigue PM. Mapping genes underlying ethnic differences in disease risk by linkage disequilibrium in recently admired populations. Am J Hum Genet. 1997;60:188–196. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smith MW, Patterson N, Lautenberger JA, et al. A high-density admixture map for disease gene discovery in African Americans. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:1001–1013. doi: 10.1086/420856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tian C, Hinds DA, Shigeta R, et al. A genomewide single-nucleotide-polymorphism panel for Mexican American admixture mapping. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;80:1014–1023. doi: 10.1086/513522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McKeigue PM. Prospects for admixture mapping of complex traits. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:1–7. doi: 10.1086/426949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.He B, Osterholm AM, Hoverfalt A, et al. Association of genetic variants at 3q22 with nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:5–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15 *.Rogus JJ, Poznik GD, Pezzolesi MG, et al. High-density single nucleotide polymorphism genome-wide linkage scan for susceptibility genes for diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes: discordant sibpair approach. Diabetes. 2008;57:2519–2526. doi: 10.2337/db07-1086. [Well powered discordant sib-pair linkage approach in type I diabetes] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16 *.Tong Z, Yang Z, Patel S, et al. Promoter polymorphism of the erythropoietin gene in severe diabetic eye and kidney complications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:6998–7003. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800454105. [The first identification of the role of the erythropoietin gene in diabetic nephropathy] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Al-Kateb H, Boright AP, Mirea L, et al. Multiple Superoxide Dismutase 1/Splicing Factor Serine Alanine 15 Variants Are Associated With the Development and Progression of Diabetic Nephropathy. Diabetes. 2008;57:218–228. doi: 10.2337/db07-1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18 **.Pezzolesi MG, Poznik GD, Mychaleckyj JC, et al. Genome-Wide Association Scan for Diabetic Nephropathy Susceptibility Genes in Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes. 2009;58:1403–1410. doi: 10.2337/db08-1514. [The first large GWAS for type 1 diabetes-associated nephropathy genes] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hanson RL, Bogardus C, Duggan D, et al. A Search for Variants Associated With Young-Onset Type 2 Diabetes in American Indians in a 100K Genotyping Array. Diabetes. 2007;56:3045–3052. doi: 10.2337/db07-0462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Millis MP, Bowen D, Kingsley C, et al. Variants in the plasmacytoma variant translocation gene (PVT1) are associated with end-stage renal disease attributed to type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2007;56:3027–3032. doi: 10.2337/db07-0675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ravichandran KS, Lorenz U. Engulfment of apoptotic cells: signals for a good meal. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:964–974. doi: 10.1038/nri2214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shimazaki A, Kawamura Y, Kanazawa A, et al. Genetic variations in the gene encoding ELMO1 are associated with susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2005;54:1171–1178. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.4.1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Leak TS, Perlegas PS, Smith SG, et al. Variants in intron 13 of the ELMO1 gene are associated with diabetic nephropathy in African Americans. Ann Hum Genet. 2009;73:152–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2008.00498.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pezzolesi MG, Katavetin P, Kure M, et al. Confirmation of Genetic Associations at ELMO1 in the GoKinD Collection Support its Role as a Susceptibility Gene in Diabetic Nephropathy. Diabetes. 2009 doi: 10.2337/db09-0641. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shimazaki A, Tanaka Y, Shinosaki T, et al. ELMO1 increases expression of extracellular matrix proteins and inhibits cell adhesion to ECMs. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1769–1776. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bowden DW, Colicigno CJ, Langefeld CD, et al. A genome scan for diabetes associated end-stage renal disease in African Americans. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1517–1526. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Vardarli I, Baier L, Hanson JA, et al. Gene for susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetes maps to 18q22.3-23. Kidney Int. 2002;62:2176–2183. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Iyengar SK, Abboud HE, Goddard KA, et al. Genome-wide scans for diabetic nephropathy and albuminuria in multiethnic populations: the family investigation of nephropathy and diabetes (FIND). Diabetes. 2007;56:1577–1585. doi: 10.2337/db06-1154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Janssen B, Hohenadel D, Brinkkoetter P, et al. Carnosine as a Protective Factor in Diabetic Nephropathy. Diabetes. 2005;54:2320–2327. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Freedman BI, Hicks PJ, Sale MM, et al. A leucine repeat in the carnosinase gene CNDP1 is associated with diabetic end-stage renal disease in European Americans. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007;22:1131–1135. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wanic K, Placha G, Dunn J, et al. Exclusion of polymorphisms in carnosinase genes (CNDP1 & CNDP2) as cause of diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Results of large case - control and follow - up studies. Diabetes. 2008;57:2547–2551. doi: 10.2337/db07-1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Riedl E, Koeppel H, Brinkkoetter P, et al. A CTG Polymorphism in the CNDP1 Gene Determines the Secretion of Serum Carnosinase in Cos-7 Transfected Cells. Diabetes. 2007;56:2410–2413. doi: 10.2337/db07-0128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.McDonough CW, Hicks PJ, Lu L, et al. The influence of carnosinase gene polymorphisms on diabetic nephropathy risk in African-Americans. Hum Genet. 2009 doi: 10.1007/s00439-009-0667-0. Epub. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Baylis C, Mitruka B, Deng A. Chronic blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in the rat produces systemic hypertension and glomerular damage. J Clin Invest. 1992;90:278–281. doi: 10.1172/JCI115849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nakayama M, Yasue H, Yoshimura M, et al. T-786-->C mutation in the 5'-flanking region of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with coronary spasm. Circulation. 1999;99:2864–2870. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.22.2864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suzuki H, Nagase S, Kikuchi S, et al. Association of a missense Glu298Asp mutation of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene with end stage renal disease. Clin Chem. 2000;46:1858–1860. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zanchi A, Moczulski DK, Hanna LS, et al. Risk of advanced diabetic nephropathy in type 1 diabetes is associated with endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism. Kidney Int. 2000;57:405–413. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00860.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Noiri E, Satoh H, Taguchi J, et al. Association of eNOS Glu298Asp polymorphism with end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2002;40:535–540. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000033974.57407.82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu Y, Burdon KP, Langefeld CD, et al. T-786C polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with albuminuria in the diabetes heart study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:1085–1090. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004100817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mollsten A, Wessman M, Svensson M, et al. Glu298Asp and NOS4ab polymorphisms in diabetic nephropathy. Ann Med. 2006;38:522–528. doi: 10.1080/07853890600969213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shi S, Yu L, Chiu C, et al. Podocyte-Selective Deletion of Dicer Induces Proteinuria and Glomerulosclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:2159–2169. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wang Q, Wang Y, Minto AW, et al. MicroRNA-377 is up-regulated and can lead to increased fibronectin production in diabetic nephropathy. FASEB J. 2008;22:4126–4135. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-112326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43 **.Kopp JB, Smith MW, Nelson GW, et al. MYH9 is a major-effect risk gene for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1175–1184. doi: 10.1038/ng.226. [This paper identified the MYH9 gene, which is involved in the spectrum of FSGS, HIVAN and hypertension-associated renal disease] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44 **.Kao WHL, Klag MJ, Meoni LA, et al. MYH9 is associated with nondiabetic end-stage renal disease in African Americans. Nat Genet. 2008;40:1185–1192. doi: 10.1038/ng.232. [This paper showed the powerful association between MYH9 and non-diabetic ESRD among African-Americans] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Freedman BI, Kopp JB, Winkler CA, et al. Polymorphisms in the nonmuscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene (MYH9) are associated with albuminuria in hypertensive African Americans: the HyperGEN study. Am J Nephrol. 2009;29:626–632. doi: 10.1159/000194791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46 **.Freedman BI, Hicks PJ, Bostrom MA, et al. Polymorphisms in the non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene (MYH9) are strongly associated with end-stage renal disease historically attributed to hypertension in African Americans. Kidney Int. 2009;75:736–745. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.701. [This paper challenged the notion that high blood pressure commonly causes ESRD in African Americans by demonstrating strong MYH9 association. This finding suggested that the disease called hypertensive nephrosclerosis truly resides in the spectrum of FSGS] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Freedman BI, Sedor JR. Hypertension-Associated Kidney Disease: Perhaps no More. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:2047–2051. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008060621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lipkowitz MS, Iyengar SK, Molineros J, Langefeld CD, et al. Association analysis of the non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene (MYH9) in hypertensive nephropathy: results from the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK). [abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Pattaro C, Aulchenko YS, Isaacs A, et al. Genome-wide linkage analysis of serum creatinine in three isolated European populations. Kidney Int. 2009;76:297–306. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Freedman BI, Hicks PJ, Bostrom MA, et al. Non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene MYH9 associations in African Americans with clinically diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus-associated ESRD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009:gfp316. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pecci A, Malara A, Badalucco S, et al. Megakaryocytes of patients with MYH9-related thrombocytopenia present an altered proplatelet formation. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102:90–96. doi: 10.1160/TH09-01-0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52 *.Salem RM, Cadman PE, Chen Y, et al. Chromogranin A Polymorphisms Are Associated With Hypertensive Renal Disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:600–614. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007070754. [This paper identified a gene involved in regulation of the sympathetic nervous system as contributing to non-diabetic ESRD in African-Americans] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53 *.Chen Y, Mahata M, Rao F, et al. Chromogranin A regulates renal function by triggering Weibel-Palade body exocytosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1623–1632. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008111148. [This paper explains potential mechanisms for CHGA gene association with non-diabetic ESRD] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kestila M, Lenkkeri U, Mannikko M, et al. Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein--nephrin--is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome. Mol Cell. 1998;1:575–582. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80057-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Franceschini N, North KE, Kopp JB, et al. NPHS2 gene, nephrotic syndrome and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: a HuGE review. Genet Med. 2006;8:63–75. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000200947.09626.1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pollak MR. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: recent advances. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2008;17:138–142. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3282f5dbe4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Aya K, Shimizu J, Ohtomo Y, et al. NPHS1 gene mutation in Japanese patients with congenital nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:2411–2414. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Boute N, Gribouval O, Roselli S, et al. NPHS2, encoding the glomerular protein podocin, is mutated in autosomal recessive steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Nat Genet. 2000;24:349–354. doi: 10.1038/74166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Billing H, Muller D, Ruf R, et al. NPHS2 mutation associated with recurrence of proteinuria after transplantation. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19:561–564. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1408-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gbadegesin R, Hinkes BG, Hoskins BE, et al. Mutations in PLCE1 are a major cause of isolated diffuse mesangial sclerosis (IDMS). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:1291–1297. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kaplan JM, Kim SH, North KN, et al. Mutations in ACTN4, encoding alpha-actinin-4, cause familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Nat Genet. 2000;24:251–256. doi: 10.1038/73456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Denamur E, Bocquet N, Mougenot B, et al. Mother-to-child transmitted WT1 splice-site mutation is responsible for distinct glomerular diseases. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999;10:2219–2223. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V10102219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kim JM, Wu H, Green G, et al. CD2-associated protein haploinsufficiency is linked to glomerular disease susceptibility. Science. 2003;300:1298–1300. doi: 10.1126/science.1081068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Winn MP, Conlon PJ, Lynn KL, et al. A mutation in the TRPC6 cation channel causes familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Science. 2005;308:1801–1804. doi: 10.1126/science.1106215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65 *.Henderson JM, Alexander MP, Pollak MR. Patients with ACTN4 mutations demonstrate distinctive features of glomerular injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:961–968. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008060613. [This paper demonstrated that unique histologic variants in FSGS maybe present based upon underlying genetic causes] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Atta MG, Lucas GM, Fine DM. HIV-associated nephropathy: epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2008;6:365–371. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.3.365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kiryluk K, Martino J, Gharavi AG. Genetic Susceptibility, HIV Infection, and the Kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:S25–S35. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00320107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cha Rh, Yang SH, Kim HS, et al. Genetic interactions between the donor and the recipient for susceptibility to acute rejection in kidney transplantation: polymorphisms of CCR5. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009:gfp317. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bol SM, van Remmerden Y, Sietzema JG, et al. Donor variation in vitro HIV-1 susceptibility of monocyte-derived macrophages. Virology. 2009;390:205–211. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Muntinghe FLH, Verduijn M, Zuurman MW, et al. CCR5 Deletion Protects Against Inflammation-Associated Mortality in Dialysis Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1641–1649. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008040432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71 **.Papeta N, Chan KT, Prakash S, et al. Susceptibility loci for murine HIV-associated nephropathy encode trans-regulators of podocyte gene expression. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1178–1188. doi: 10.1172/JCI37131. [This paper identified novel loci for animal models of HIV-nephropathy and their effect on podocyte gene expression] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Jeanpierre C, Whitmore SA, Austruy E, et al. Chromosomal assignment of the uromodulin gene (UMOD) to 16p13.11. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1993;62:185–187. doi: 10.1159/000133470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pook MA, Jeremiah S, Scheinman SJ, et al. Localization of the Tamm-Horsfall glycoprotein (uromodulin) gene to chromosome 16p12.3-16p13.11. Ann Hum Genet. 1993;57:285–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1993.tb00902.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Hart TC, Gorry MC, Hart PS, et al. Mutations of the UMOD gene are responsible for medullary cystic kidney disease 2 and familial juvenile hyperuricaemic nephropathy. J Med Genet. 2002;39:882–892. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.12.882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Benetti E, Caridi G, Vella MD, et al. Immature Renal Structures Associated With a Novel UMOD Sequence Variant. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;53:327–331. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76 **.Kottgen A, Glazer NL, Dehghan A, et al. Multiple loci associated with indices of renal function and chronic kidney disease. Nat Genet. 2009 doi: 10.1038/ng.377. [Largest existing GWAS for kidney function in the general population and identified UMOD as an important regulator of renal function] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kottgen A, Hwang SJ, Rampersaud E, et al. TCF7L2 variants associate with CKD progression and renal function in population-based cohorts. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:1989–1999. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007121291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Iwai N, Kajimoto K, Kokubo Y, et al. Extensive Genetic Analysis of 10 Candidate Genes for Hypertension in Japanese. Hypertension. 2006;48:901–907. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000242485.23148.bb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Yoshida T, Kato K, Fujimaki T, et al. Association of Genetic Variants with Chronic Kidney Disease in Japanese Individuals. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:883–890. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04350808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schadt EE, Lamb J, Yang X, et al. An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease. Nat Genet. 2005;37:710–717. doi: 10.1038/ng1589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Anderson JL, Hauser ER, Martin ER, et al. Complete genomic screen for disease susceptibility loci in nuclear families. Genet Epidemiol. 1999;17(Suppl 1):S473–S478. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370170776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Stranger BE, Forrest MS, Clark AG, et al. Genome-wide associations of gene expression variation in humans. PLoS Genet. 2005;1:695–704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83 *.Ju W, Eichinger F, Bitzer M, et al. Renal Gene and Protein Expression Signatures for Prediction of Kidney Disease Progression. Am J Pathol. 2009;174:2073–2085. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080888. [This paper identified novel mRNA and protein expression signatures that may predict progression of CKD in humans] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Murphy M, Crean J, Brazil DP, et al. Regulation and consequences of differential gene expression in diabetic kidney disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2008;36:941–945. doi: 10.1042/BST0360941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Phillips PC. Epistasis-- the essential role of gene interactions in the structure and evolution of genetic systems. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:855–867. doi: 10.1038/nrg2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Bouchard C. Gene-Environment Interactions in the Etiology of Obesity: Defining the Fundamentals. Obesity. 2008;16:S5–S10. doi: 10.1038/oby.2008.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Armengol L, Rabionet R, Estivill X. The emerging role of structural variations in common disorders: initial findings and discovery challenges. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;123:108–117. doi: 10.1159/000184698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nica AC, Dermitzakis ET. Using gene expression to investigate the genetic basis of complex disorders. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:R129–R134. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddn285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES