Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2010 Jun 10;5(6):e11069. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011069

Polymorphisms in the Mitochondrial DNA Control Region and Frailty in Older Adults

Ann Z Moore 1, Mary L Biggs 2, Amy Matteini 1, Ashley O'Connor 3, Sarah McGuire 3, Brock A Beamer 4, M Danielle Fallin 1, Linda P Fried 5, Jeremy Walston 6, Aravinda Chakravarti 3, Dan E Arking 3,*
Editor: Iris Schrijver7
PMCID: PMC2883558  PMID: 20548781

Abstract

Background

Mitochondria contribute to the dynamics of cellular metabolism, the production of reactive oxygen species, and apoptotic pathways. Consequently, mitochondrial function has been hypothesized to influence functional decline and vulnerability to disease in later life. Mitochondrial genetic variation may contribute to altered susceptibility to the frailty syndrome in older adults.

Methodology/Principal Findings

To assess potential mitochondrial genetic contributions to the likelihood of frailty, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation was compared in frail and non-frail older adults. Associations of selected SNPs with a muscle strength phenotype were also explored. Participants were selected from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), a population-based observational study (1989–1990, 1992–1993). At baseline, frailty was identified as the presence of three or more of five indicators (weakness, slowness, shrinking, low physical activity, and exhaustion). mtDNA variation was assessed in a pilot study, including 315 individuals selected as extremes of the frailty phenotype, using an oligonucleotide sequencing microarray based on the Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence. Three mtDNA SNPs were statistically significantly associated with frailty across all pilot participants or in sex-stratified comparisons: mt146, mt204, and mt228. In addition to pilot participants, 4,459 additional men and women with frailty classifications, and an overlapping subset of 4,453 individuals with grip strength measurements, were included in the study population genotyped at mt204 and mt228. In the study population, the mt204 C allele was associated with greater likelihood of frailty (adjusted odds ratio = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.07–3.60, p = 0.020) and lower grip strength (adjusted coefficient = −2.04, 95% CI = −3.33– −0.74, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

This study supports a role for mitochondrial genetic variation in the frailty syndrome and later life muscle strength, demonstrating the importance of the mitochondrial genome in complex geriatric phenotypes.

Introduction

Mitochondria are a principle contributor to cellular metabolism and produce much of the chemical energy required by cells [1][3]. Mitochondria are also integral to some apoptotic processes and are a major production site of reactive oxygen species (ROS) which have both essential and deleterious functions within cells [3][7]. Mitochondrial capacity for ATP production and the efficiency of this production are determinants of cellular metabolism, and are thus integral to the dynamics of energy supply and influence metabolic rate of the body on whole [8]. Mitochondria are potential contributors to reductions in the ability to modify resting metabolic rate in response to stressors, and it has been hypothesized that such losses of metabolic plasticity may lead to dysregulation of homeostatic balance and subsequent declines in health [9]. Due to these diverse functions, age-related changes in mitochondria as well as variation in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) have been hypothesized to play a role in degenerative and senescent processes and ultimately contribute to increases in late life vulnerability to chronic disease states, and functional decline. Mitochondrial variation is also hypothesized to influence frailty, a syndrome of decreased reserve and resilience characterized by multi-systemic declines [10], [11]. Indeed, variants in mtDNA have been associated with an increased risk for many chronic diseases and conditions common in older adults including aspects of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, dementias, hearing loss, and cancers [3], [12][16].

We hypothesized that the accumulation of environmental exposures across the life course may alter the magnitude of the effect of mtDNA variants on mitochondrial pathways or that inherited patterns of general inefficiency may manifest as observable deficits in later life when accumulated damage is no longer compensated for by other systems increasing susceptibility to the frailty syndrome. In addition, given that the impact of mitochondrial dysfunction may be more pronounced in metabolically active skeletal muscle tissue we further explored a possible intermediate phenotype, grip strength, in order to gain insight into the potential paths linking mtDNA to the frailty phenotype.

Methods

Ethics Statement

CHS protocols were approved by each field center's institutional review board; all participants provided written informed consent.

Study Design

The study population and a small pilot group were selected from the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). CHS is a population-based prospective cohort study of the causes of cardiovascular disease in community dwelling adults aged 65 and older; CHS study design, population selection, and protocols have been previously described [17]. Briefly, potential study participants were recruited based upon Medicare eligibility data from four areas: Forsyth County, NC, Sacramento County, CA, Washington County, MD, and Pittsburgh, PA. 5,201 participants were initially enrolled; to improve cohort diversity an additional 687 African-Americans were later recruited. At baseline, June 1989 – June 1990 and November 1992 – June 1993, CHS participants completed an interview and examination that ascertained detailed demographic, health history, and health behavior information as well as clinical and laboratory measurements [17]. Demographic information and anthropometric measurements used for our analyses, including age, sex, race, and BMI, were obtained from CHS baseline interview and examination data. Adjudicated diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and diabetes mellitus were also drawn from the CHS baseline evaluation [17]. Frail individuals were identified by the presence of three or more of the following previously validated criteria: shrinking, slow walking speed, weakness, self-reported exhaustion, and low physical activity [10], [11]. Isometric grip strength was measured using a Jamar hand-held dynamometer: the strength measure represents the mean of three attempts with the dominant hand [10]. Weakness was defined as a strength measure below the 20th percentile of sex and BMI stratified strength distributions [10].

The pilot study of 154 frail (mean age = 75.00, s.d. = 4.45) and 161 older robust (mean age = 81.35 s.d. = 3.16) individuals was selected from CHS participants who provided consent for genetic studies. In an attempt to maximize the genetic difference between the two groups the pilot participants were selected from the youngest frail and oldest robust participants. We further restricted selection to self-identified whites, due to the limited number of frail blacks in CHS, and matched on sex, resulting in ∼70% females in the pilot group. Individuals with Parkinson's disease, as identified by self-report or medication use, were not eligible for the pilot study, individuals who used Alzheimer's disease related medications, anti-depressants, had a Mini-Mental State Exam score less than 18, BMI greater than 40, or adjudicated history of stroke were also ineligible. “Robust” individuals in the pilot group were the oldest eligible non-frail individuals. All individuals in the CHS study who provided consent for genetic studies were eligible for the full study population. From the 5,077 additional CHS participants with available DNA, but not included in the pilot study, 31 individuals reporting a race/ethnicity other than white or black were excluded. An additional 515 individuals were excluded for indicators of disease (as above) and 96 were excluded for BMI>40. The frailty status of 7 remaining participants was not classified. The final combined population for frailty analyses included 4,459 participants not genotyped in the pilot group plus the 315 pilot participants. Exploratory grip strength analyses excluded individuals based upon the same disease-related criteria but included some individuals that lacked frailty status classification. Participants were excluded that were missing BMI data or had grip strength recorded as <0 kg or >80 kg (n = 317). The final grip strength analyses included 4,453 participants.

Genotyping

In the pilot study, variants in mtDNA obtained from peripheral lymphocytes were characterized using an oligonucleotide sequencing microarray with probes based upon the Revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS [NC_012920]): the Human Mitochondrial Resequencing Array 2.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) [18]. Grid-alignment and genotype calls were assigned using RA Tools Ver1.0.5 (http://www.dpgp.org/RA/ra.htm) based on the ABACUS algorithm under a model that assumes a completely haploid genome (i.e. no appreciable levels of heteroplasmy) [19]. An average call rate of 98.6% (range 97.2% to 98.9%) was observed. SNPs were detected at 899 sites, and 209 SNPs with minor allele frequencies (MAF) greater than 1% were included in this analysis.

Individual SNPs selected for follow-up, after demonstrating nominal statistical significance (p<0.05) in pilot analyses, were genotyped with TaqMan assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) in all 5,392 CHS participants with genetic consent. Raw data were analyzed using a model that may detect potential heteroplasmy. Genotyping at mt204 was 89.1% complete, and mt228 was 92.0% complete. Frequency of potential heteroplasmy among called genotypes was .003 and <.001 respectively. The concordance between resequencing array and confirmatory TaqMan assay calls was 99.43%. In analyses of mt204 and mt228 using the full population, resequencing array and TaqMan genotypes were combined to minimize missing genotypes. Pilot participants with inconsistent calls across methods were assigned ‘no call’ at the SNP, which resulted in 2 missing genotypes at mt204 and 1 at mt228. Participants with calls indicating potential heteroplasmy were also assigned ‘no call’.

Statistical Analysis

Student's t-tests with unequal variance and Fisher's exact χ2 tests were used to describe the distribution of non-genetic variables of interest across frail and robust individuals among pilot participants and across allele groups in the study population. In the pilot study Fisher's exact χ2 tests were used to detect whether the proportion of frail and robust individuals who possessed the minor allele at each of the 209 mtSNPs with MAF >0.01 differed from expectation. The χ2 tests were calculated across all participants genotyped at a SNP as well as in sex-stratified groups. In the study population, cross-sectional frailty analyses were stratified by race and sex. Fisher's exact χ2 tests were used to compare the proportion of individuals with each allele at selected SNPs. Logistic regression models were used to compare the odds of frailty among allele groups adjusted for age, sex, and/or race. Exploratory cross-sectional grip strength analyses included comparison of the strength measurement across alleles using t-tests with unequal variance stratified as above. The relationship between grip strength and allele was modeled using linear regression. Models were adjusted for age, (age−70)+, BMI, BMI2, race and/or sex. Grip strength comparisons were repeated after excluding frail participants. Sensitivity analyses compared measures of association when individuals with potential heteroplasmy were included in different allele groups. All analyses were performed using R, version 2.8.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Association of mtDNA variation with frailty

To assess the potential for a mitochondrial genetic contribution to frailty, common variants in mtDNA, identified using oligonucleotide resquencing arrays, were compared among frail and non-frail individuals in a pilot study. This 315 person group was selected from CHS based upon demographic and disease-related characteristics, focusing on the youngest frail and oldest robust individuals, in an attempt to maximize the genetic difference between the two groups. The pilot group was further restricted to self-identified whites and matched on the proportion of women in the frail and non-frail group. As expected based upon the pilot study selection criteria, the mean age of individuals in the non-frail group (81.35 yrs, s.d. = 3.16) was substantially greater than that of the frail group (75.00 yrs, s.d. = 4.45). Further, the frail participants demonstrated a larger chronic disease burden than non-frail pilot participants with approximately two to four times greater prevalence of diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, and congestive heart failure (Table 1).

Table 1. Distribution of selected characteristics among all CHS white and black participants with frailty classification (n = 5275) as well as in the pilot population across frailty status.

Characteristic White Pilot Black
Non-frail Frail p* Non-frail Frail p Non-frail Frail p
(n = 4223) (n = 262) (n = 161) (n = 154) (n = 688) (n = 102)
Age, mean ± SD 72.43±5.37 77.36±6.36 <.001 81.35±3.16 75.00±4.45 <.001 72.05±5.09 75.44±6.76 <.001
Female, n (%) 2377 (56.3) 174 (66.4) .001 111 (68.9) 112 (72.7) .536 425 (61.8) 76 (74.5) .015
Body mass index, mean ± SD 26.32±4.33 26.52±5.61 .570 24.98±3.65 26.28±4.75 .007 28.61±5.25 29.00±7.01 .595
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 571 (13.6) 60 (23.1) <.001 13 (8.1) 38 (24.8) <.001 161 (24.2) 29 (30.2) .209
Coronary heart disease, n (%) 776 (18.4) 83 (31.7) <.001 28 (17.4) 52 (33.8) .001 127 (18.5) 24 (23.5) .226
Congestive heart failure, n (%) 138 (3.3) 37 (14.1) <.001 6 (3.7) 26 (16.9) <.001 29 (4.2) 14 (13.7) <.001

*t-test with unequal variance for comparison of continuous characteristics across pilot population groups, Fisher's exact χ2 for categorical comparisons.

†missing BMI for some participants: white nnon-frail = 4212, nfrail = 262; black nnon-frail = 686, nfrail = 101.

‡missing diabetes mellitus status for some participants: white nnon-frail = 4199, nfrail = 260; pilot nnon-frail = 160, nfrail = 153, black nnon-frail = 665, nfrail = 96.

When comparing SNP differences between frail and non-frail groups in the pilot study, the most statistically significant p-value achieved, 0.006, was observed at a SNP in the D-loop, mt204 (Table S1). A disproportionate number of frail individuals (7/141, 5%) possessed the minor allele (C) at this position compared to the non-frail individuals (0/151). In sex-stratified comparisons the lowest p-values were also observed at SNPs in the D-loop: in men at mt146 (p = 0.003) and in women at mt228 (p = 0.035) (Table S1). The A allele at position 228 was observed in 8/111 (7.2%) frail women but in only 1/110 (0.9%) non-frail women.

The three SNPs that were statistically significant (p<0.05) in the overall or sex-stratified analyses of pilot resequencing array genotypes were selected as candidates for genotyping in the remaining CHS samples; however assay design failed for mt146, which was subsequently dropped from all further analyses. As shown in Table 2, 87 of 3,708 eligible white individuals (2.3%) are carriers of the C allele at mt204. At mt228, The A allele was present in 211 out of 3,821 (5.5%) white individuals (Table S2). The distributions of demographic and disease-related variables were similar across allele groups at mt204 and mt228 in non-pilot participants (Table 2, Table S2).

Table 2. Distribution of selected characteristics by mt204 allele in participants stratified by race.

Characteristic White* Black
All Pilot Non-pilot
T (n = 3621) C (n = 87) p T (n = 285) C (n = 7) p T (n = 3327) C (n = 81) p T (n = 540) C (n = 30) p
Frail, n (%) 193 (5.3) 8 (9.2) .142 134 (47.0) 7 (100) .006 56 (1.7) 2 (2.5) .648 63 (11.7) 6 (20.0) .242
Age, mean ± SD 72.77±5.58 72.83±5.78 .922 78.47±4.90 73.0±4.62 .020 72.26±5.35 72.85±5.89 .375 72.54±5.50 71.17±4.28 .101
Female, n (%) 2044 (56.4) 52 (59.8) .585 203 (71.2) 4 (57.1) .419 1836 (55.2) 48 (59.3) .499 331 (61.3) 18 (60.0) 1
Body mass index, mean ± SD 26.14±4.09 26.19±3.97 .913 25.37±4.14 25.55±4.88 .926 26.20±4.07 26.22±3.93 .958 28.04±4.62 29.03±4.83 .284
Diabetes mellitus, n (%)§ 503 (13.9) 11 (12.6) .875 44 (15.5) 1 (14.3) 1 457 (13.8) 9 (11.1) .623 114 (21.7) 9 (32.1) .241
Coronary heart disease, n (%) 706 (19.5) 14 (16.1) .494 71 (24.9) 3 (42.9) .375 632 (19.0) 11 (13.6) .252 106 (19.6) 4 (13.3) .484
Congestive heart failure, n (%) 141 (3.9) 3 (3.4) 1 28 (9.8) 2 (28.6) .155 113 (3.4) 1 (1.2) .524 30 (5.6) 5 (16.7) .030

*The strata labeled “All” includes pilot participants who were not called in array genotyping but were called by the secondary mt204 assay and excludes participants with inconsistent calls across assays.

†t-test with unequal variance for comparison of continuous characteristics, Fisher's exact χ2 for categorical comparisons.

‡Missing BMI for some participants: white, all nT = 3613, nC = 87; white, non-pilot nT = 3319, nC = 81; black nT = 538, nC = 30.

§Missing diabetes mellitus status for some participants: white, all nT = 3608, nC = 87; white, pilot nT = 283, nC = 7; white, non-pilot nT = 3316, nC = 81; black nT = 525, nC = 28.

To assess the relationship of variation at mt204 and mt228 with frailty, trends in the frequency of the minor allele at each candidate SNP were observed and logistic regression models were evaluated. While not statistically significant, the direction of the odds ratio for frailty in the group of all CHS participants identifying as white was consistent with pilot data for mt204: in a logistic regression model adjusted for age and sex the odds of frailty were 1.75 (95% CI = 0.74–3.61, p = 0.164) times greater among the group with the C allele than those with the T allele. The non-pilot white participant group includes few frail individuals however adjusted models still indicated a small positive association between the C allele and frailty (Table 3). In the group of participants identifying as black, none of whom were part of the pilot study, a similar trend was observed, odds ratio: 2.33 (95% CI = 0.82–5.74, p = 0.082). Given the consistent directions of association across race/ethnicity stratified groups, combined models assessing mt204 allele were evaluated. The odds of frailty were statistically significantly greater among all participants with the C allele than those with the T allele after adjustment for age, sex, and race, odds ratio: 2.04 (95% CI = 1.07–3.60, p = 0.020). In sex-stratified groupings a stronger association between the minor allele and frailty was observed among men: 3.83 (95% CI = 1.48–8.77, p = 0.003), than among women: 1.33 (95% CI = 0.53–2.86, p = 0.503). Using a model incorporating a sex by allele interaction term, we observed a 2.93-fold (95% CI = 0.87–9.93) increased risk in men relative to women, although this result did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.079). A consistent association between the mt228 A allele and frailty was not observed in the study population (Table S3). Substantial differences in these associations were not observed in sensitivity analyses including potentially heteroplasmic participants.

Table 3. Odds ratios estimating the association of frailty with the C allele at mt204 in the CHS populations observed in stratified multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex and/or race.

Group Odds ratio (95% confidence interval) p
Race/ethnicity strata White All (n = 3708) 1.75 (0.74, 3.61) .164
Non-pilot (n = 3408) 1.11 (0.15, 4.70) .904
Black (n = 570) 2.33 (0.82, 5.74) .082
Combined (n = 4278) 2.04 (1.07, 3.60) .020
Sex strata Female (n = 2445) 1.33 (0.53, 2.86) .503
Male (n = 1833) 3.83 (1.48, 8.77) .003

Association of mt204 with grip strength

Weakness is a component of the frailty syndrome that may relate closely to mitochondrial variation because it is partially determined by characteristics of skeletal muscle, a metabolically active tissue. Associations of mt204 allele with grip strength were assessed using multiple linear regression models. Lower mean grip strength was observed in groups with the mt204 C allele, consistent with the effect of the C allele on frailty. In multivariate linear regression models adjusting for age, (age−70)+, sex, BMI and BMI2, the C allele was associated with an approximately two kilogram mean reduction in strength: −2.04 (95% CI = −3.33, −0.74, p = 0.002) (Table 4). In sex-stratified models, the C allele was associated with a greater reduction in strength among men: −3.48 kg (95% CI = −5.94 – −1.02, p = 0.006), than among women: −1.13 kg (95% CI = −2.50–0.24, p = 0.105) (p for interaction = 0.075).

Table 4. Mean difference in grip strength (kg) associated with the mt204 C allele estimated by stratified multivariate regression models adjusted for age, (age−70)+, BMI, BMI2, sex, and race.

Group Model 1* Model 2
Coefficient (95% confidence interval) p
Race/ethnicity strata White (n = 3435) −1.60 (−3.10, −0.11) .035 −1.63 (−3.12, −0.14) .032
Black (n = 558) −3.11 (−5.85, −0.37) .027 −3.26 (−5.99, −0.54) .019
Combined (n = 3993) −1.80 (−3.10, −0.50) .006 −2.04 (−3.33, −0.74) .002
Sex strata Female (n = 2274) −0.87 (−2.26, 0.51) .217 −1.13 (−2.50, 0.24) .105
Male (n = 1719) −3.31 (−5.77, −0.85) .008 −3.48 (−5.94, −1.02) .006

*Adjusted for age, (age−70)+, and sex.

†Adjusted for age, (age−70)+, BMI, BMI2, male sex and/or black race.

To test whether the association with grip strength was driven by the association with frailty, we assessed grip strength after excluding frail participants. The inverse relationship between the C allele and grip strength persisted after excluding frail participants, indicating that the mt204 association with grip strength was not solely a product of its association with frailty (Table S4). To test the reverse hypothesis, that the association with grip strength may be driving the association with frailty, grip strength was introduced into logistic regression models for frailty. The mt204 odds ratio in most models was attenuated but remained positive (Table S5). Further, while the mt204 C allele was not statistically significantly associated with four other phenotypes that help define the frailty syndrome, marginal positive trends were observed for three of the criteria (Table S6).

Discussion

Given the role of mitochondria in decreased metabolism and increased generation of ROS with aging, there is a strong a priori argument that mtDNA variation may contribute to global losses in metabolic plasticity leading to the decreased resilience that is a hallmark of the frailty phenotype. In the present study, analyses of genotypes representing the entire mtDNA obtained through evaluation of a resequencing array under a haploid model in a pilot study of frail and robust individuals generated several promising SNPs. Through follow up genotyping of selected candidates in the entire CHS cohort, we identified mt204 to be associated with frailty. Though less pronounced than in the pilot study, consistently positive associations between the C allele and frailty were observed across all study population groups including participants identifying as black, a group that does not overlap the pilot sample. The influence of mt204 was most apparent after stratification of the population by sex: the odds of frailty among men with the C allele were three times those with the T allele. Further, the absence of variation in the distribution of diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, and congestive heart failure by mt204 allele in the full study population suggests that the observed associations with frailty may not be a consequence of an association with chronic disease. Subsequently, an association between mt204 and grip strength was explored, not only because of the contribution of grip strength to frailty assessment, but also because of the dependence of skeletal muscle on metabolic processes. Again, the observed association was more pronounced in males, but was consistent across the entire CHS population and remained even after excluding frail individuals to minimize the potential for bias due to initial selection methods. The presence of an association in the absence of frail participants strongly suggests that the mt204 association with grip strength is not a consequence of its association with frailty. Models for frailty incorporating grip strength and models for other frailty related variables (unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity level) suggest that general skeletal muscle strength, captured here by grip strength, may influence other components of the syndrome, or mt204 may broadly contribute to frailty in a manner that is most apparent in the weakness component.

While mt204 is not in a protein coding region, its location suggests plausible mechanisms for influencing frailty and grip strength. mt204 is within hypervariable segment 2 and has been previously documented as a variant in phylogenetic analyses of the mitochondrial DNA sequence, but is not unique to a single haplogroup [20], [21]. The SNP is also located within the D-loop of the mtDNA control region [20]. mtDNA control region SNPs have been both positively and negatively associated with longevity [22] and mt16189, also a control region variant, has been associated with endometrial cancer and diabetes risk [23], [24]. mt204 is located within the heavy strand origin of replication [25], and thus variation at this SNP may effect the efficiency of mtDNA replication; autosomal genes have been previously linked to mtDNA replication disorders that include muscle myopathy phenotypes [26]. Other SNPs identified in the pilot population, mt146 and mt228, are also located in this region.

While pathways involving variation at mt204 are plausible, it is also possible that the observed associations are due to chance or an unrecognized consequence of population selection criteria. Validation of the mt204 findings in different populations as well as exploration of intermediate phenotypes is necessary. Additionally, several limitations of the present study should be noted. The small size of the pilot study limits statistical power as well as the ability to characterize the effects of less common genetic variants: it is possible that selected candidates do not represent the only mtDNA variants with a potential influence on frailty. In this study we have taken an approach focusing on inherited variation (as measured in DNA isolated from pooled lymphocytes) as opposed to somatic changes, and we are not able to assess the variants of interest in additional tissue types. In our exploration of grip strength we were unable to fully characterize other influences on muscle strength such as muscle mass and neuromuscular control. Finally, the majority of mitochondrial functional and structural genes are located within the autosomal genome: describing variation in these genes may be critical to fully characterizing mitochondrial contributions to frailty. Despite these limitations, we observed statistically significant association between variation in the mitochondrial genome and frailty. Variation in mitochondrial function may lead to homeostatic dysregulation that may be central to this complex geriatric phenotype. The results of this investigation support a role for mitochondrial genetic variation in the frailty syndrome and later life muscle strength.

Supporting Information

Table S1

(0.04 MB DOC)

Table S2

(0.04 MB DOC)

Table S3

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S4

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S5

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S6

(0.03 MB DOC)

Footnotes

Competing Interests: Aravinda Chakravarti is a paid member of the Scientific Advisory Board of Affymetrix, a role that is managed by the Committee on Conflict of Interest of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Funding: This research was supported by the National Institute on Aging, Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Centers, Grant P30 AG021334 and by contract numbers N01-HC-85079 through N01-HC-85086, N01-HC-35129, N01 HC-15103, N01 HC-55222, N01-HC-75150, N01-HC-45133, grant number U01 HL080295 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, with additional contribution from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. A full list of principal CHS investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.chs-nhlbi.org/pi.htm. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Wallace DC. Mitochondrial diseases in man and mouse. Science. 1999;283(5407):1482–8. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5407.1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scheffler IE. Hoboken, New Jersey: 2008. Mitochondria. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wallace DC. A mitochondrial paradigm of metabolic and degenerative diseases, aging, and cancer: A dawn for evolutionary medicine. Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:359–407. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.110304.095751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Green DR, Reed JC. Mitochondria and apoptosis. Science. 1998;281(5381):1309–12. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5381.1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ow YP, Green DR, Hao Z, Mak TW. Cytochrome c: Functions beyond respiration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(7):532–42. doi: 10.1038/nrm2434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Droge W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiol Rev. 2002;82(1):47–95. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MT, Mazur M, et al. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39(1):44–84. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rolfe DF, Brown GC. Cellular energy utilization and molecular origin of standard metabolic rate in mammals. Physiol Rev. 1997;77(3):731–58. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1997.77.3.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ruggiero C, Ferrucci L. The endeavor of high maintenance homeostasis: Resting metabolic rate and the legacy of longevity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(5):466–71. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.5.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146–56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bandeen-Roche K, Xue QL, Ferrucci L, Walston J, Guralnik JM, et al. Phenotype of frailty: Characterization in the women's health and aging studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(3):262–6. doi: 10.1093/gerona/61.3.262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wilson FH, Hariri A, Farhi A, Zhao H, Petersen KF, et al. A cluster of metabolic defects caused by mutation in a mitochondrial tRNA. Science. 2004;306(5699):1190–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1102521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ballinger SW, Shoffner JM, Gebhart S, Koontz DA, Wallace DC. Mitochondrial diabetes revisited. Nat Genet. 1994;7(4):458–9. doi: 10.1038/ng0894-458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.van der Walt JM, Dementieva YA, Martin ER, Scott WK, Nicodemus KK, et al. Analysis of european mitochondrial haplogroups with alzheimer disease risk. Neurosci Lett. 2004;365(1):28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.04.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.van der Walt JM, Nicodemus KK, Martin ER, Scott WK, Nance MA, et al. Mitochondrial polymorphisms significantly reduce the risk of parkinson disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(4):804–11. doi: 10.1086/373937. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fischel-Ghodsian N. Mitochondrial mutations and hearing loss: Paradigm for mitochondrial genetics. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(1):15–9. doi: 10.1086/301695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, Furberg CD, Gardin JM, et al. The cardiovascular health study: Design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1(3):263–76. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(91)90005-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhou S, Kassauei K, Cutler DJ, Kennedy GC, Sidransky D, et al. An oligonucleotide microarray for high-throughput sequencing of the mitochondrial genome. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8(4):476–82. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cutler DJ, Zwick ME, Carrasquillo MM, Yohn CT, Tobin KP, et al. High-throughput variation detection and genotyping using microarrays. Genome Res. 2001;11(11):1913–25. doi: 10.1101/gr.197201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.MITOMAP: A human mitochondrial genome database. 2009. Available: http://www.mitomap.org. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 21.van Oven M, Kayser M. Updated comprehensive phylogenetic tree of global human mitochondrial DNA variation. Hum Mutat. 2009;30(2):E386–94. doi: 10.1002/humu.20921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coskun PE, Ruiz-Pesini E, Wallace DC. Control region mtDNA variants: Longevity, climatic adaptation, and a forensic conundrum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(5):2174–6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0630589100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu VW, Wang Y, Yang HJ, Tsang PC, Ng TY, et al. Mitochondrial DNA variant 16189T>C is associated with susceptibility to endometrial cancer. Hum Mutat. 2003;22(2):173–4. doi: 10.1002/humu.10244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Poulton J, Luan J, Macaulay V, Hennings S, Mitchell J, et al. Type 2 diabetes is associated with a common mitochondrial variant: Evidence from a population-based case-control study. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11(13):1581–3. doi: 10.1093/hmg/11.13.1581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tapper DP, Clayton DA. Mechanism of replication of human mitochondrial DNA. localization of the 5' ends of nascent daughter strands. J Biol Chem. 1981;256(10):5109–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Copeland WC. Inherited mitochondrial diseases of DNA replication. Annu Rev Med. 2008;59:131–46. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.59.053006.104646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1

(0.04 MB DOC)

Table S2

(0.04 MB DOC)

Table S3

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S4

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S5

(0.03 MB DOC)

Table S6

(0.03 MB DOC)


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES