Abstract
Cytochrome aa3-600 is one of the principle respiratory oxidases from Bacillus subtilis and is a member of the heme-copper superfamily of oxygen reductases. This enzyme catalyzes the two-electron oxidation of menaquinol and the four-electron reduction of O2 to 2H2O. Cytochrome aa3-600 is of interest because it is a very close homologue of the cytochrome bo3 ubiquinol oxidase from Escherichia coli, except that it uses menaquinol instead of ubiquinol as a substrate. One question of interest is how the proteins differ in response to the differences in structure and electrochemical properties between ubiquinol and menaquinol. Cytochrome bo3 has a high affinity binding site for ubiquinol that stabilizes a ubi-semiquinone. This has permitted the use of pulsed EPR techniques to investigate the protein interaction with the ubiquinone. The current work initiates studies to characterize the equivalent site in cytochrome aa3-600. Cytochrome aa3-600 has been cloned and expressed in a His-tagged form in B. subtilis. After isolation of the enzyme in dodecylmaltoside, it is shown that the pure enzyme contains 1 eq of menaquinone-7 and that the enzyme stabilizes a mena-semiquinone. Pulsed EPR studies have shown that there are both similarities as well as significant differences in the interactions of the mena-semiquinone with cytochrome aa3-600 in comparison with the ubi-semiquinone in cytochrome bo3. Our data indicate weaker hydrogen bonds of the menaquinone in cytochrome aa3-600 in comparison with ubiquinone in cytochrome bo3. In addition, the electronic structure of the semiquinone cyt aa3-600 is more shifted toward the anionic form from the neutral state in cyt bo3.
Keywords: Cytochrome Oxidase, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR), Membrane Energetics, Quinones, Respiratory Chain
Introduction
A number of prokaryotes contain heme-copper respiratory oxygen reductases, which utilize a membrane-bound quinol as the substrate (electron donor) (1, 2). These enzymes (quinol oxidases) are closely related to the cytochrome c oxidases, reduce O2 to water, and also pump protons across the membrane bilayer, generating a proton motive force. The quinol oxidases lack CuA, which is present in the cytochrome c oxidases, and the amino acid sequences of the quinol oxidases can be distinguished from those of the cytochrome c oxidases by the lack of the CuA binding motif.
The most intensively studied heme-copper quinol oxidase is the cytochrome bo3 ubiquinol oxidase from Escherchia coli (cyt bo3)3 (3–8). There are currently over 400 sequences of quinol oxidases that are homologues of cyt bo3. The vast majority of these sequences are from proteobacteria (330 sequences) or the firmicutes (80 sequences). Bacillus subtilis, a firmicute, does not contain ubiquinone but relies on menaquinone (see Fig. 1) as a redox component in its aerobic respiratory chain (9). There is a homologue of cyt bo3 in B. subtilis called cytochrome aa3-600, and as expected, this enzyme is a menaquinol oxidase (10–16). Whereas E. coli cyt bo3 uses only ubiquinol as a substrate, the B. subtilis cyt aa3-600 is strictly a menaquinol oxidase. The motivation of the current work is to decipher the differences between the protein-quinol interactions of the bo3-type ubiquinol oxidase and the aa3-600 menaquinol oxidase.
FIGURE 1.

Chemical structures of menaquinone-n, menadione, and phylloquinone.
Cyt bo3 has two ubiquinone binding sites, one site with high affinity (QH) and one with low affinity (QL). The QL-site is the substrate binding site, and the quinone at this site exchanges readily with the quinone pool in the membrane (17, 18). Despite significant effort (17, 19, 20), little is known about the location of this site within the protein (21). Cyt bo3, when purified using the detergent dodecylmaltoside, has 1 eq of ubiquinol-8 bound at the QH-site, and this bound quinol does not readily exchange with the free quinol in the membrane (18, 22–24). The ubiquinone bound at the QH-site functions as a cofactor, accepting two electrons from the quinol at the QL-site and passing the electrons on to heme b one at a time. Reduced (ferrous) heme b then transfers an electron to the heme o3/CuB active site, where O2 is reduced to 2H2O (25).
The ubiquinone bound at the QH-site of cyt bo3 forms a stable semiquinone when the protein is partially reduced (26, 27). A combination of x-ray crystallography, site-directed mutagenesis, and pulsed EPR methods have been used to define the residues at the QH-site and details of the interactions between these residues and the bound semiquinone (3, 4, 6, 21, 28–30). Four polar residues have been implicated in binding to the quinol at the QH-site in cyt bo3: Arg-71, Asp-75, His-98, and Gln-101. Within the >400 sequences of quinol oxidases, Arg-71, Asp-75, and His-98 are totally conserved. Gln-101 is totally conserved in sequences from proteobacteria but is often replaced by a glutamic acid in the homologues in the Firmicutes, including the B. subtilis aa3-600 menaquinol oxidase.
Pulsed EPR methods have revealed several salient features of the interactions between the residues at the QH-site of cyt bo3 and the SQ; 1) the hydrogen bonding to the SQ is highly asymmetric, with strong hydrogen bonds to carbonyl O-1 and weaker interactions at carbonyl O-4 side (6), 2) there is one strong hydrogen bond between the ϵ-nitrogen of Arg-71 and carbonyl O-1 of the SQ, resulting in a substantial transfer of unpaired electron spin to this nitrogen (3), 3) there is a strong hydrogen bond between Asp-75 and carbonyl O-1 of the SQ (4), 4) there is a weak interaction between His-98 and carbonyl O-4 of the SQ with a small amount of spin density found on the nitrogens of His-98, 5) there is a very weak interaction between carbonyl O-4 of the SQ and the side chain of Gln-101 (3), 6) the SQ in cyt bo3 is in the neutral, protonated state at pH 7.5 (6).
In the current work it is demonstrated that the aa3-600 menaquinol oxidase from B. subtilis, isolated with the detergent dodecylmaltoside, contains 1 eq of bound menaquinone-7. Partial reduction of the enzyme results in formation of a SQ, analogous to the formation of the SQ formed at the QH-site in cyt bo3. In the B. subtilis aa3-600 menaquinol oxidase, the four residues at the putative QH-site are Arg-70, D74, His-94, and Glu-97. The SQ stabilized by the B. subtilis aa3-600 was examined using continuous-wave and pulsed EPR methods. The results show a distinctly different pattern of hydrogen bonding between the protein and SQ species in the menaquinol oxidase than that observed with the E. coli cyt bo3 ubiquinol oxidase.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Enzyme Preparation
The qoxABCD operon, encoding the B. subtilis aa3-600 menaquinol oxidase, was cloned and expressed from plasmid pLala (Cmr) under the control of the glp promoter. Plasmid pLala replicates both in E. coli and B. subtilis. E. coli strains transformed with pLala vector were maintained on LB plates with 12 μg/ml chloramphenicol. A His6 tag was introduced at the C terminus of qoxB to faciliate protein purification by nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid. The isolated recombinant plasmid pLala was transformed into B. subtilis strain LUW143, lacking both the aa3-600 menaquinol oxidase and caa3-type cytochrome c oxidase (ΔqoxABCD::kan ΔctaCD::ble) (31). Liquid cultures were inoculated with B. subtilis cells grown on LB plates containing appropriate antibiotics. Cells were grown in LB medium treated with 5 μg/ml chloramphenicol, 7.5 μg/ml neomycin, and 1.8 μg/ml zeomycin at 37 °C. Enzyme expression was induced by the addition of 20 mm glycerol. To isolate cell membranes, cell pellets were resuspended in buffer containing 50 mm K2HPO4 or 50 mm Tris plus 10 mm MgCl2 at pH 7.5 and disrupted at high pressure (100 p.s.i.) by using a microfluidizer (Microfluidics Corp., Worcester, MA). Cell debris was removed by brief centrifugation at 8000 × g. The supernatant was then subjected to centrifugation at 180,000 × g for at least 4 h to collect membranes. The isolated membranes were dispersed in 50 mm K2HPO4, pH 7.5, and homogenized with 1% dodecylmaltoside (Anatrace) by stirring at 4 °C. The solution was centrifuged at 180,000 × g for 1 h to remove insoluble fragments and then loaded onto a nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid column for purification. The column was initially equilibrated with 50 mm K2HPO4, 40 mm NaCl, 0.05% dodecylmaltoside, pH 7.5, for 3–5 column volumes. At least two incremental stepwise washes were performed with buffer containing up to 15 mm imidazole. Cytochrome aa3-600 was eluted with buffer containing 100 mm imidazole. The protein was dialyzed overnight against 50 mm K2HPO4, 0.05% dodecylmaltoside, pH 7.5, and concentrated to ∼200 μm. For the preparation of 15N-labeled protein sample, cells were grown in Spizizen minimal medium, where the nitrogen source was replaced with isotopically labeled 15NH4Cl (Cambridge Isotope, Andover, MA).
Specific Activity
Cyt aa3-600 oxidase had a turnover of 61 electrons s−1 at 25 °C with 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone (DMN) in 50 mm Tris, 0.05%, pH 7.0. The respiratory activity was started by reducing 10 μm DMN in the presence of 200 μm NADH and excess amounts of purified diaphorase and by adding 0.05 μm of aa3-600 oxidase. The steady-state activity was monitored by oxidation of NADH at 340 nm. The autooxidation of DMN at concentrations above 10 μm prevented a study of oxidase activity dependence on substrate concentration. Among the various quinol-type electron donors, DMN was previously shown to have the highest enzyme activity (11).
Isolation of Bound Quinone by Reverse-phase HPLC
Quinone was extracted from the purified enzyme preparation with 3 ml of solvent containing methanol/petroleum ether (6:4, v/v) and repeated three times. The organic phase was combined and treated further after a procedure previously described (18). The quinone was isolated by reverse-phase HPLC using a Varian Microsorb-MV 100–5 C18 column (4.6 mm × 25 cm) and a Waters HPLC system. Isoprenoid quinone structure was characterized by mass spectroscopy (Mass Spectrometry Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL).
EPR Measurements
To prepare the samples for EPR analysis, the purified protein (100–200 μm) was reduced anaerobically in the presence of a 3–5-fold excess of DMN and a 200-fold excess of NADH and rapidly frozen in the EPR tube. The continuous-wave EPR measurements were performed on an X-band Varian EPR-E122 spectrometer and a Q-band Bruker ELEXSYS 580 equipped with a separate Q-band microwave bridge and cavity operating at a 100 kHz modulation frequency. The pulsed EPR experiments were carried out using an X-band Bruker ELEXSYS E580 spectrometer equipped with Oxford CF 935 cryostats. Several types of experiments with different pulse sequences were employed with appropriate phase-cycling schemes to eliminate unwanted features from the experimental echo envelopes. Among these experiments were one- and two-dimensional three-pulse and four-pulse sequences, which are described in detail elsewhere (3). Spectral processing of three- and four-pulse ESEEM patterns was performed using Bruker WIN-EPR software, including subtraction of the relaxation decay (fitting by 3–6 degree polynomials), apodization (Hamming window), zero filling, and fast Fourier transformation. Pulsed ENDOR spectra of the radicals were obtained using Davies and Mims sequences with different pulse lengths. The specifics of these experiments are described in detail elsewhere (4, 32).
RESULTS
Menaquinone Co-purifies with Cytochrome aa3-600
The preparation of his-tagged cytochrome aa3-600 was assayed for the presence of quinone. It was found that 1.25 eq of menaquinone-7 (Fig. 1) co-purifies with the enzyme, which is extracted from the membrane and purified using the detergent dodecylmaltoside.
EPR Spectra
Fig. 2 shows X- and Q-band EPR spectra of the SQ in the wild type cyt aa3-600. The X-band spectrum displays a single pattern with a g value of 2.0047 ± 0.0001 and resolved hyperfine structure consisting of the four components with approximate relative intensities 1:3:3:1 and a splitting of ∼0.45–0.49 mT (or 12–13 MHz). The hyperfine structure resolution is better in the sample prepared in 2H2O. On the other hand, the uniform 15N labeling of the protein does not significantly influence the EPR line-shape of the SQ. This EPR feature is tentatively assigned to three equivalent nonexchangeable protons interacting with the unpaired electron. The Q-band spectrum, measured with about 3.5-times higher microwave frequency than the X-band, resolves the g-tensor anisotropy with components gxx = 2.00642 ± 0.00002, gyy = 2.00540 ± 0.00002, gzz = 2.00228 ± 0.00004. Additional hyperfine structure (also better resolved in the sample prepared in 2H2O) can be seen in the area around gyy; however, its complete resolution would require experiments at microwave frequencies ∼95 GHz or higher. The components of the g-tensor, determined from the Q-band spectra of cyt aa3-600 SQ prepared in H2O and 2H2O, are within the range previously reported for various SQs in model systems and in proteins (30, 33, 34). A Q-band spectrum with a similar shape was previously reported for the semiquinone intermediate stabilized in the membrane-bound subunit NarI of nitrate reductase (NarGHI) from E. coli (35).
FIGURE 2.
A, the X-band EPR spectra of the semiquinone in cytochrome aa3-600 in 1H2O and 2H2O are shown. Both the samples were measured at identical conditions. The experimental parameters used were: modulation amplitude = 0.16 mT; modulation frequency, 100 kHz; time constant = 32 ms; MW power = 40 decibels = 20 microwatts; MW frequency = 9.087 GHz; temperature, 105 K. The dotted lines in the upper spectra correspond to the simulated spectra. The simulated spectra were obtained with components of the g tensor, determined from Q-band spectra (see “EPR Spectra”), and isotropic hyperfine coupling 0.49 mT with three equivalent protons. B, the Q-band EPR spectra of the semiquinone in cytochrome aa3-600 in 1H2O and 2H2O. Both the samples were measured at identical conditions. The experimental parameters used were: modulation amplitude = 0.3 mT; time constant = 20.48 ms; conversion time = 40.96 ms; sweep time 41.94 s; MW power = 5.3 microwatts; the MW frequency 34.106 GHz; temperature 90 K. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl with a g-value of 2.00351 has been used as a field marker. The asterisk (*)-marked dip in the upper spectra seems to appear as a cavity background that is more prominent at lower MW powers. Arrows indicate magnetic field positions used for the determination of the g-tensor principal values (see “EPR Spectra”).
Nitrogens Detected by 14N and 15N ESEEM
Powder-type ESEEM spectra, obtained with frozen protein solutions, do not usually show all of the 14N nuclei that are magnetically coupled with the SQ. This is due to the influence of the nuclear quadrupole interaction (3, 4, 6, 36). To observe all of the nitrogens that magnetically interact with the unpaired electron spin of the SQ, it is necessary to use 15N-labeled protein. The 15N nucleus is a spin ½ system and does not possess the nuclear quadrupole moment that affects the 14N ESEEM spectra. Therefore, we performed ESEEM experiments both with the wild type cyt aa3-600-containing natural abundance 14N (99.16%) and with uniformly 15N-labeled protein.
Fig. 3 shows a representative 15N HYSCORE spectrum from a uniformly 15N-labeled sample, measured at the maximum of the SQ EPR line and displayed in contour (A) and three-dimensional-stacked (B) presentations. The 15N line-shape is centered around the sharp peak at a diagonal point (15νN,15νN) with a 15N Zeeman frequency 15νN ∼1.5 MHz. This peak is accompanied by extended shoulders with two weakly resolved maxima at (1.94, 1.08) MHz (1) and (1.73, 1.33) MHz (2) corresponding to couplings of 0.96 MHz and 0.4 MHz, respectively. The total length of the shoulders is ∼1.5 MHz along the antidiagonal, symmetrically around (15νN,15νN). This significantly exceeds typical values of the anisotropy for protein nitrogens interacting with a SQ (3, 36), suggesting that more than one nitrogen interacts with the SQ, accompanied by the transfer of unpaired spin density onto their nuclei.
FIGURE 3.
Contour (A) and three-dimensional stacked (B) presentations of the HYSCORE spectrum of the SQ at the QH site of the uniformly 15N-labeled cytochrome aa3-600 (magnetic field 346.1 mT; time between first and second pulses τ = 136 ns; MW frequency 9.706 GHz).
Major features of the 14N HYSCORE spectrum (Fig. 4, A and B) are the cross-peaks (1) correlating the frequencies at 3.5 and 4.5 MHz (±0.03 MHz). In addition, the spectrum resolves several other off-diagonal cross-features (2–4) of lower intensity, symmetrically located relative to the diagonal. The maxima of these cross-peaks are located at (3.0, 2.3) MHz (2), (3.0, 2.0) MHz (3), and (3.5, 2.0) MHz (4). Only the cross-peaks at (3.0, 2.3) MHz (2) possess a shape with well pronounced maxima. Cross-peaks 3 and 4 essentially have flat tops, indicating that they could be part of extended cross-features correlating transitions with significant orientation dependence. For this reason, the one-dimensional three-pulse ESEEM spectra show only two peaks at frequencies 3.5 and 4.4 MHz from transitions possessing a low orientation dependence in the HYSCORE spectra and do not resolve any other features (supplemental Fig. S1). The 3.5-, 3.0-, and 2.0-MHz frequencies are each made up of two different cross-peaks and cannot be assigned by assuming that all features are produced by the same nitrogen nucleus. A comparison of the frequencies of cross-peaks 1–4 shows that only 1 and 3 have a common frequency 3.5 MHz and, thus, could belong to the same nucleus. Cross-peaks 2 and 4 involve frequencies different from those of 1 and 3 and could be part of the extended cross-features correlating other transitions from either the same nucleus or from one or more different 14N nuclei. In summary, the 15N and 14N HYSCORE spectra indicate that the SQ in cyt aa3-600 interacts with at least two nitrogens from the protein environment.
FIGURE 4.
Contour (A) and three-dimensional stacked (B) presentations of the 14N HYSCORE spectrum of the SQ at the QH site of the cytochrome aa3-600 (magnetic field 346.4 mT; time between first and second pulses τ = 136 ns; MW frequency 9.713 GHz).
Proton HYSCORE and ESEEM
Besides the nitrogens, the HYSCORE spectra contain information about non-exchangeable and exchangeable protons interacting with the electron spin of the SQ. Fig. 5 shows the 1H HYSCORE spectra of the SQ in the cyt aa3-600 prepared in 1H2O (A and B) and 2H2O (C) buffer. Similar spectra for the SQ in the Qi-site of the cytochrome bc1 complex (37) and QH-site of cytochrome bo3 (6) have been discussed previously. In addition to a diagonal peak with extended shoulders at the proton Zeeman frequency (νH∼14.75 MHz), the spectrum contains several pairs of resolved cross-features located symmetrically relative to the diagonal. They are designated 1, 2, 3, and 4. The cross-peaks labeled 1 demonstrate the largest hyperfine splitting, of the order ∼10 MHz. Cross-ridges 2 possess the most extended anisotropic contour, with the largest deviation from the diagonal indicating a significant anisotropic hyperfine component. Cross-peaks 3 and 4 are located in a similar area of the plot, close to each other and partially overlapping, as shown in Fig. 5B. Contours 1 and 3 are approximately normal to the diagonal, suggesting a smaller anisotropy. The contours of cross-peaks 4, located above those of cross-peaks 3, indicate an anisotropic hyperfine interaction intermediate between the couplings producing cross-peaks 3 and 2.
FIGURE 5.
1H HYSCORE spectra of the SQ at the QH site of the cytochrome aa3-600 in 1H2O (A and B) and 1H2O (C). Spectra were obtained after Fourier transformation of the two-dimensional time-domain patterns containing 256 × 256 points with a 20-ns step. The magnetic field was 346.4 mT (A and B) and 346.1 mT (C), time τ between the first and second microwave pulses was 136 ns, and the MW frequency was 9.713 GHz (A and B) and 9.707 GHz (C).
Cross-peaks 2 and 4 (Fig. 5C) completely disappear in the HYSCORE spectra obtained under the same conditions using the sample with 2H2O, showing that they are produced by exchangeable protons. However, cross-peaks 1 and 3 as well as the diagonal peak, with its shoulders, still appear in the spectra obtained in 2H2O. The 1H/2H exchange does affect the intensity of cross-peaks 3, which indicates that these peaks result from the simultaneous contribution of exchangeable and non-exchangeable protons. Additional support for this conclusion was obtained from pulsed ENDOR spectra (see below).
Quantitative analysis of the cross-peak contour line-shapes and simulations of the spectra, described in detail in Yap et al. (6) and Dikanov et al. (37) and the supplemental data (including supplemental Figs. S2 and S3 and Table S1) provides the isotropic (a) and anisotropic (T) components of the hyperfine tensors. These are obtained using an axial approximation for protons H1, H2, and H4 associated with cross-peaks 1, 2, and 4. The data are summarized in Table 1. Protons H2 and H4 are clearly exchangeable with the solvent. Cross-peaks 3 are produced by several non-exchangeable and weakly coupled exchangeable protons (see “Discussion”), and the parameters determined from this formal analysis do not correspond to any real structural characteristics.
TABLE 1.
Hyperfine tensors of the protons H1-H4 (MHz) derived from HYSCORE spectra
The method of analysis of the 1H HYSCORE spectra gives two possible sets of a and T with interchanged values of A⊥ and A‖ for each proton. Arguments used for the selection of the values given in Table 1 are provided in the supplemental material (section “Proton HYSCORE”) and in our previous publications (4, 6).
| Proton | a, T | A⊥ = a − T | A‖ = a + 2T |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1 | 11.0, 1.6 | 9.4 | 14.2 |
| H2 | ∓5.4, ±5.6 | ∓11.0 | ±5.8 |
| H4 | ∓1.7, ∓2.9 | ±1.2 | ∓7.5 |
Additional information was obtained from complementary one-dimensional four-pulse ESEEM and pulsed ENDOR experiments. In particular, the one-dimensional four-pulse experiments show the existence of two exchangeable protons with anisotropic couplings |T| ∼ 2.8 and 5.4 MHz (supplemental Fig. S4).
Pulsed ENDOR
Fig. 6, A and B, shows Davies pulsed ENDOR spectra for the SQ in cyt aa3-600 prepared in 1H2O and 2H2O. The spectrum in 1H2O contains two pairs of peaks, 1A and 2A, located symmetrically relative to νH with splittings of ∼11 and ∼ 2.7–4.0 MHz, respectively. 1H/2H exchange influences the shape and relative intensity of the major peaks. In 1H2O, peaks 1A possess well resolved shoulders corresponding to a splitting of ∼10.0 MHz between the points marked as 1′ on the peaks. These shoulders (1′) suggest that at least two different components contribute to the spectral features in this region. This is supported by the spectrum in 2H2O solvent (peaks 1B) showing the signals from non-exchangeable protons, which is likely the origin of the shoulders in peaks 1A. The difference spectrum shows peaks 1C at the frequencies ∼9 and 20 MHz with intensities exceeding other peaks (Fig. 6C). The splitting between these peaks of ∼11 MHz is in agreement with the A⊥ value predicted by the analysis of the contour line-shape for exchangeable proton H2 (anisotropic component T = ±5.6 MHz; isotropic constant a = ±5.4 MHz).
FIGURE 6.
Pulsed 1H ENDOR spectra of the semiquinone in cytochrome aa3-600 in 1H2O (A) and 2H2O (B). The spectrum from exchangeable protons C was obtained as the difference of A and B. The spectra were measured using the Davies pulse sequence (π-T-π/2-τ-π-Echo with a radiofrequency π pulse applied during the time interval T), the length of MW pulses tMW = 80, 40, and 80 ns, respectively, τ = 400 ns, length of a radiofrequency pulse = 8 μs, MW frequency = 9.6992 GHz, temperature 70 K.
The analysis of the contour line-shape in axial approximation (supplemental Fig. S2) provides the components of the hyperfine tensor in canonical orientations A⊥ = 9.4 MHz and A‖ = 14.2 MHz for cross-peaks 1 in the HYSCORE spectra (Fig. 5, Table 1). The locations of peaks 1B in the ENDOR spectra (Fig. 6B) correspond to these limits. The splitting between the points of maximum intensity at ∼11 MHz in the ENDOR spectrum corresponds well to the splitting from three equivalent protons observed in the X-band EPR spectrum. Based on this analysis, we suggest that the major contribution to features 1 in the HYSCORE and 1B in the ENDOR spectra is due to the three methyl protons of the menaquinone SQ. These protons would have equal hfi tensors due to rapid rotation of the methyl group.
In addition, there are changes to peaks 2A due to the 1H/2H replacement. The difference spectrum shows the signal from exchangeable protons in the area corresponding to splittings up to ∼5 MHz, which could be from the protons contributing to the cross-peaks 2–4 in the HYSCORE spectra.
All other non-exchangeable protons of the SQ, including the β-protons of the isoprenyl tail and α-protons of the benzoic ring (in positions 5–8, Fig. 1), possess small couplings and contribute to the cross-peaks 2B. The frequency limits of cross-peaks 2B suggest that the maximum principal values of the hyperfine tensors of any of these non-exchangeable protons do not exceed 6–7 MHz.
DISCUSSION
Nitrogens Interacting with the SQ
A useful starting point for discussing the experimental data for nitrogen (14N and 15N) nuclei is the 14N HYSCORE powder spectra of the SQ (Fig. 4). Cross-peaks (1) correlate two double-quantum transitions, νdq+ = 4.5 MHz and νdq- = 3.5 MHz, from opposite mS manifolds of the 14N nucleus (supplemental Fig. S5). These transitions possess low orientation dependence and produce the most intensive cross-peaks in the HYSCORE spectra (38). The frequencies of double-quantum transitions in the powder spectra are described by the equation (39),
where νef± = |14νN ± 14A/2|, 14νN and 14A are the Zeeman frequency and hyperfine coupling of 14N nucleus, respectively. The parameter κ = K2(3 + η2), in which K = e2qQ/4h, the quadrupole coupling constant, and η is the asymmetry parameter.
In this case, an application of Equation 1, assigning νdq+ = 4.5 MHz and νdq− = 3.5 MHz, would provide an estimate of the hyperfine coupling with the 14N nucleus, using the formula,
This equation along with the 14N Zeeman frequency (14νN = 1.066 MHz for the field 346.3 mT) gives a hyperfine coupling 14A = 0.94 MHz. The shape of double-quantum transitions in three-pulse and HYSCORE spectra indicate that the isotropic constant provides the major contribution to the hyperfine coupling. Using this estimated value of 14A, one can calculate the parameter κ = K2(3 + η2) from Equation 1, which is equal to 2.70 MHz2. Assuming that 0 ≤ η ≤ 1, this leads to a quadrupole coupling constant K = 0.82–0.95 MHz.
The quadrupole coupling constant of the 14N atoms in different chemical groups can be used for identification of the nitrogen and characterization of the hydrogen bond to the SQ. The estimated interval of the constant K partially overlaps with the quadrupole coupling constant for a peptide nitrogen NH-C
O, whose values vary between 0.75 and 0.85 MHz in different compounds, including proteins (Ref. 6 and references therein). It is also consistent with the quadrupole coupling constant K ∼ 0.9–1.0 MHz of nitrogens from the NH and NH2 groups in primary aliphatic and aromatic amines and amides (40). On the other hand, this coupling constant is larger than the K values reported for either the deprotonated or protonated nitrogens of the imidazole residue (36). That rules out histidine as a hydrogen bond partner to the SQ of cyt aa3-600.
For the SQ in the QH-site of the cyt bo3, the nitrogen possessing the largest hyperfine coupling was identified as the NϵH from side chain of Arg-71 using selective isotope 15N labeling (3). The hyperfine coupling, 14A ∼ 1.8 MHz, due to this nitrogen is two times larger than the largest coupling, 14A ∼ 0.9 MHz, in cyt aa3-600. The coupling in cyt bo3 satisfies well the cancellation condition |14νN − 14A/2| ∼ 0 in X-band EPR. This condition allows one to determine directly the nqi tensor from 3 resolved nqi frequencies in ESEEM spectra, yielding K = 0.93 MHz and η = 0.51 for the arginine Nϵ (6, 29). These values give κ = 2.82 MHz2, which differs only slightly from the estimated value of κ = 2.7 MHz2 for the nitrogen coupled to the SQ from cyt aa3-600 (see above). This close coincidence of the quadrupole parameters (κ) suggests that the Nϵ of Arg-70 in cyt aa3-600 is also a primary candidate for the role of the nitrogen-carrying largest unpaired spin density and, thus, involved in H-bond formation with the SQ.
The 14N HYSCORE spectra, which are calculated using the hyperfine coupling 14A ∼ 0.9 MHz and nuclear quadrupole parameters K = 0.94 MHz and η = 0.5, reasonably reproduce the location of cross-peaks 1 at (4.5, 3.5) MHz with intensities significantly exceeding other minor features that appear in the area of peaks 2-4 in the experimental spectra. The location of cross-peaks 1 is not influenced by an addition of an anisotropic hfi even with the perpendicular component of the tensor as large as T ∼ 0.2 MHz. The locations of other cross-features are, however, strongly influenced by the anisotropic hfi as well as by the relative orientation of the hfi and nqi tensors.
The estimated coupling, 14A ∼ 0.9 MHz, corresponds to 15A ∼ 1.26 MHz for 15N. The 15N line-shape in the HYSCORE spectra shows an extended contour with the shoulders extending ∼1.5 MHz. This is consistent with a coupling of ∼1.26 MHz, although even the largest resolved coupling, 15A ∼ 0.96 MHz (peaks 1 in Fig. 5), is significantly smaller than this value. Two factors can explain this difference. First, the positions of line maxima in powder spectra for the double-quantum transitions of 14N and single-quantum transition of 15N, used to estimate 14A and 15A, are determined by different factors. This results in effectively different couplings in the presence of the anisotropic contribution to the hyperfine coupling. The difference will be greater as the anisotropic hfi gets larger. Second, because the total length of the 15N resonance line exceeds typical values of the anisotropic hfi for protein nitrogens interacting with a SQ (3, 36, 41), it is likely that the extended 15N line-shape in the HYSCORE spectra with two resolved splittings is formed by the spectra from several (probably more than two) nitrogens possessing partially overlapped intervals of nuclear frequencies and, thus, producing an extended resonance contour. Overlap of the spectra from different nuclei can produce the resolved maxima at the new frequencies, shifted from the frequency of the maximum intensity in the individual spectrum of each contributing nitrogen. Individual couplings with nitrogens from different residues in the SQ environment can be characterized using selective labeling with 15N, which is what was done to resolve the situation for the QH-site SQ in cyt bo3. The unpaired spin density producing measurable hyperfine couplings was found on at least four nitrogens from Arg-71 and His-98 in cyt bo3 (3).
Applying Equations 1 and 2 to the frequencies of the cross-features 2-3, one obtains 14A ∼ 0.4–0.6 MHz and κ = 0.36–0.6 MHz2. The small value of κ is consistent with values previously reported for the protonated imidazole nitrogen from histidine residues H-bonded with the SQs (see Table 2 in Ref. 36). This estimated value of 14A is also similar to the hyperfine couplings from the nitrogens of His-98 in cyt bo3 (3). Thus, the available 14N and 15N ESEEM data can be reasonably interpreted as resulting from the presence of several nitrogens presumably from residues Arg-70 and His-94 involved in the interaction with the SQ accompanied by the transfer of unpaired spin density onto these nitrogens. Although the equivalent nitrogens from Arg-71 and His-98 interact with the SQ in cyt bo3, values of hyperfine couplings are not the same, reflecting differences in hydrogen bond geometry and overlap of the electronic orbitals of the SQ and protein residues.
TABLE 2.
Hyperfine couplings with methyl protons and protons of hydrogen bonds in semiquinones from the vitamin K group
| Quinone | 2-Methyl, a | 2-Methyl, [A1, A2, A3]; a | H-bond proton, A⊥; A‖ | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHz | MHz | MHz | ||
| Vitamin K1 | 7.36 | 48 | ||
| Menadione | 8.1 | 48 | ||
| Vitamin K1 | 7.32 | 6.4, 9.7, 6.7; 7.6a | −2.7; 5.7 | 49 |
| Vitamin K1 | 5.9, 9.2, 5.9; 7.0b | 49 | ||
| Vitamin K1 | 6.8, 6.8, 10; 7.9 | −2.2; 5.2 | 50 | |
| Naphtoquinone | −2.7; 5.68 | 51 | ||
| Menadione | 7.88 | 6.4, 9.7, 5.8; 7.3 | 51 | |
| Vitamin K1 | 7.39 | 6.4, 10.2, 6.05; 7.55 | 51 | |
| MQ-4 | 6.6, 10.1, 6.6; 7.8 | −2.2, 4.6 | 52 | |
| −2.2, 5.5 | ||||
| A1˙̄ | 9.1, 12.8, 8.7; 10.2 | −4.9; (14.8) | 49 | |
| A1˙̄c | 9.0, 12.8, 9.0; 10.3 | −5.0; 13.4 | 50 | |
| −5.8; – | ||||
| A1˙̄d | 9.0, 12.6, 9.0; 10.2 | −5.2; 13.4 | 50 | |
| −6.0; – | ||||
| A1˙̄e | −4.9; 7.7 | 53 | ||
| A1˙̄f | 9.1, 12.7, 8.6; 10.1 | −3,5; 7.4 | 54 | |
| A1˙̄g | 8.7, 12.3, 8.2; 9.7 | –; −7.4 | 54 | |
| QA˙̄h | 6.0, 8.5, 6.0; 6.8 | −4.6; – | 52 | |
| Vitamin K1 in cyt bo3 | 11.2, 14.4, 11.2; 12.3 | −5.0; 12.7 | 55 | |
| MQ-7 in cyt aa3-600 | 9.4, 9.4,14.2; 11.0 | (∓11.0) i; (±5.8) (±1.2); (∓7.5) | This work |
a Isopropanol.
b Dimethyl ether/MTHF.
c Anabaena variabilis.
d Spinach.
e d8-Vitamin K3 in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803.
f Vitamin K1 in T. elongatus.
g Vitamin K3 in Synechocystis menB26 mutant.
h MQ-9 in Rps. viridis;
i Values were predicted from HYSCORE analysis; coupling of ∼10 MHz was resolved in difference (1H2O-2H2O) ENDOR spectrum.
Further work is needed to clarify the situation, utilizing 15N-selective labeling to characterize the individual isotropic and anisotropic hyperfine couplings with the side chain and peptide nitrogens of different residues. In addition, pulsed EPR experiments at lower microwave frequencies (3–4 MHz; S-Band EPR) will better satisfy the cancellation condition for the 14A couplings and, therefore, allow the accurate determination of the nuclear quadrupole tensors of the 14N nuclei (36, 41). Both the anisotropic hfi and nqi tensors of the nitrogens will be necessary to model the length and geometry of each of the H-bonds between the SQ and nitrogen partners.
Exchangeable Protons
The current data show two exchangeable protons with significant differences in their hyperfine couplings for the SQ in cyt aa3-600. These protons possess anisotropic hyperfine couplings with |T | ∼ 5.6 and 2.9 MHz. The first value significantly exceeds and second one is comparable with value |T| ∼ 3 MHz, determined from ENDOR experiments with different SQs for in-plane hydrogen-bonded protons in alcoholic solutions (42–44). Hydrogen bonding to the quinone carbonyl groups occurs via proton donation to the two lone pairs on the sp2-hybridized carbonyl oxygen. Density functional theory calculations show that a hyperfine coupling of |T| ∼ 3 MHz is consistent for a proton participating in a planar hydrogen bond, forming an angle ± 60° with C
O bond and with a hydrogen bond length ∼1.8 Å (45). A similar bond length has been estimated using a point-dipole model for the O…H bond. It is reasonable to conclude that the H-bond to the SQ of cyt aa3-600 involving the proton with |T | ∼ 2.9 MHz fits this geometric description.
The second H-bond to the SQ of cyt aa3-600 with an exchangeable proton has a much larger anisotropic hyperfine coupling, |T| ∼ 5.6 MHz. An orientation-selected, 1H/2H Q-band ENDOR study of the QA-site SQ in the photosynthetic reaction center has reported a hyperfine tensor with a similarly high value of T = 5.2 MHz and a = −1.28 MHz for one H-bonded proton (46). The point-dipole estimate gives the O…H distance equal to 1.32 Å for this proton. However, the estimated bond length based on the value of the 2H quadrupole coupling tensor is 1.6 Å. According to DFT calculations (45), a hydrogen bond with planar geometry with an anisotropic coupling of T ∼ 5.2 MHz would require an O….H bond length of ∼1.4 Å. A planar H-bond with a value of T = 5.6 MHz, found in the current work, would correspond to even shorter O…H distance.
It is also reasonable to consider the data in terms of an H-bond that is not in the plane of the SQ. Density functional theory calculations show that, given a constant O…H distance, deviation of the H-bond out of the SQ plane leads to a simultaneous increase of both the isotropic and anisotropic couplings of the H-bonded proton (47). This would be the result for any H-bonds that are forced by geometric constraints to be either above or below the ring plane. For the SQ in the QA-site, described above, the H-bond containing the proton with T = 5.2 MHz forms angle 40° with respect to the quinone plane and angle of 13° with the C
O bond (46). Analysis of the 1H cross-peak contours in the HYSCORE spectrum shows that the exchangeable proton observed in the SQ of cyt aa3-600 with |T| = 5.6 MHz has two possible values for the isotropic constant, |a| = 5.4 or 0.2 MHz (supplemental Table S1). The difference between these two solutions is in the interchanged values of A⊥ and A‖. However, the simulations of the HYSCORE spectra (supplemental Fig. S3) and locations of the line assigned to A⊥ in the ENDOR spectrum of exchangeable protons (Fig. 6C) support the solution with the unusually large isotropic constant. An even stronger anisotropic hyperfine coupling, T = 6.3 MHz, was found for one exchangeable proton in cyt bo3, which we interpreted as evidence for a neutral radical with substantial covalent character to the O-H bond (6), but we have not found evidence for such a large isotropic constant in cyt bo3. Although further work is warranted, the most reasonable interpretation of these data indicates that the H-bond involving the proton with |T| = 5.6 MHz in cyt aa3-600 is significantly out-of-plane of the SQ ring.
Proton Couplings; Spin Density Distribution
The hyperfine couplings for both the non-exchangeable methyl protons and for the exchangeable protons obtained from HYSCORE and ENDOR experiments with the SQ of the menaquinone-7 in cyt aa3-600 provide information about the interaction with the protein environment, greatly aided by the results from previous studies of 2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone derivatives (the vitamin K group; Fig. 1) in model systems and proteins.
All members of the vitamin K group share a naphthoquinone ring structure methylated at the second position and vary in the aliphatic side chain attached at the 3-position (see Fig. 1), including menadione (called also vitamin K3), phylloquinone (vitamin K1), and menaquinones (vitamin K2). Vitamin K2 is a collective term for a family of menaquinones (MQs) that have side chains composed of a variable number of unsaturated isoprenoid residues. Generally they are designated as MQ-n, where n specifies the number of isoprenoids varying from 4 to 13.
When examined in liquid and solid organic solvents, the anion radicals of derivatives of 2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone have similar isotropic couplings and anisotropic tensors for the protons in the equivalent positions. These data, supported by density functional theory calculations, indicate a weak influence on the spin-density distribution from the side chain at the 3-position. The isotropic hyperfine constant and the average perpendicular component of the anisotropic hfi tensor for the methyl protons vary from 7.0 to 7.9 MHz and from 1.0 to 1.3 MHz, respectively (48–52, 55; Table 2). In hydrogen-bonding solvents such as alcohols, the hfi tensors for each of the exchangeable protons, which participate in H-bonds with the two carbonyl oxygens, are also similar for the same set of compounds. The hfi tensors possess an axial perpendicular component in the range of T ∼ 2.3 to 2.8 MHz and have small isotropic couplings of ∼0.1 to 0.3 MHz. As expected, the two carbonyl oxygens form a total of four H-bonds, similar to the data obtained with other types of quinones in alcohol solutions (42–45).
In contrast to these results, the isotropic constant for methyl protons of the SQ of menaquinone-7 in cyt aa3-600 is substantially larger, a = 11 MHz. This indicates a significant redistribution of the unpaired spin density compared with the anion radical in organic solvents. A similarly large isotropic constant, ∼10–12 MHz, has been reported for the methyl protons for the SQ of the phylloquinone in the A1 center of the photosystem I (49, 50, 54) and in the QH-site of cyt bo3 (55) (in this experiment native ubiquinone-8 was artificially replaced by phylloquinone). The methyl protons for the SQ of the menaquinone-9 in the QA-site of the reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas viridis have an isotropic constant that is not quite as large, about 6.8 MHz (52).
The proton isotropic constant of the rotating methyl group is directly proportional to the π-spin density on the attached carbon atom, as described by the McConnell relation, a = 81ρπ (56). Thus, the unpaired π-spin density on the carbon attached to the methyl group of the SQ in cyt aa3-600 (and the A1 center of photosystem I) is about ∼1.5-fold larger (∼9% to ∼13.5%) compared with the anionic SQ radicals in alcohol solvents.
Our ENDOR spectra show that other non-exchangeable protons, i.e. the β-protons of the isoprenyl tail and of the α-protons of the benzoic ring, contribute to peaks 2, with the maximum splitting of ∼7.5 MHz. The reported values of the isotropic couplings for β-protons and α-protons in vitamin K anion-radicals in organic solvents do not exceed 4 and 2.2 MHz, respectively. The maximum components of the anisotropic hyperfine tensors of α-protons are smaller than 3.6 MHz in these model studies. The shape of the peaks 2 in the ENDOR spectra of the SQ from cyt aa3-600 (Fig. 6) also suggests an increase of the hyperfine coupling for some α-protons as a result of a shift in spin density compared with the model systems in organic solvents.
The differences in hyperfine couplings between anion radicals in alcohol solutions and SQ radicals in proteins result from an asymmetry of hydrogen bonding with the carbonyl oxygens of the SQ in the proteins, which leads to a redistribution of both the spin density and charges within the quinone ring. The couplings for the SQ in cyt aa3-600 (and for the A1 center in photosystem I) can be explained by a stronger hydrogen bond between the protein surroundings and oxygen O4, compared with oxygen O1 (Fig. 1). The bound oxygen O4 possesses a larger negative charge to stabilize the interaction with the proton participating in this strong H-bond, and thus, the spin density is partly shifted within the SQ (33, 54). The result is an increase of the unpaired spin density at C2, which increases the isotropic coupling of the methyl group protons.
Comparison with the SQ of Center A1 from Photosystem I
A comparison of the ENDOR-derived hyperfine tensors of the exchangeable protons can be used to estimate the relative strength of H-bonds. However, unresolved issues in the literature on the SQ of center A1 limit the utility of this comparison. Several publications (49, 50, 52, 53, 55) report the value of A⊥ ∼ −(4.6–5.2) MHz for the exchangeable, H-bonded proton in the SQ of center A1 (Table 2). One report provides the experimental value of A⊥ = a − T = −5.0 MHz together with A‖ = a + 2T = 13.4 MHz (50), which gives the value of a = 1.1 MHz and T = 6.1 MHz for the H-bonded proton in A1 site. The authors postulated also second H-bond to A1˙̄ with A⊥ = −5.8 MHz that in principle corresponds to |A⊥| ∼ 5.4 MHz for the H4 determined from HYSCORE spectra in this work. In contrast, the most recent Q-band ENDOR study of the A1˙̄ radical in photosystem I indicates only one hydrogen bond between the backbone NH group of a leucine residue and the O4 oxygen of the SQ. The reported hyperfine tensor of the H-bond proton possesses A⊥ = −3.5 MHz, and A‖ = 7.4 MHz for both the radical anions of phylloquinone and menadione in the A1 center of photosystem I from Thermosynechococcus elongatus and Synechocystis menB26 mutant, respectively (54). The point dipole model yields an estimated distance for this H-bond of 1.64 Å. This hydrogen bond is responsible for the observed asymmetry in the spin density distribution in the center A1 SQ. Differences between this model, with one H-bond, and previous work are explained as resulting from contamination of the PS I sample by other paramagnetic species.
The model of the A1 center SQ with one strong H-bond is, however, not consistent with the results of a one-dimensional ESEEM study of the phyllosemiquinone radical A1˙̄ in 14N- and 15N-labeled photosystem I (57). The ESEEM study reports the existence of at least two protein nitrogens coupled to the SQ and carrying unpaired spin density. These nitrogens were tentatively assigned to the indole nitrogen of a tryptophan residue and a ring nitrogen of a histidine, although the side chain amide nitrogens of an asparagine or glutamine could not be ruled out. An x-ray structure reported after publication of this ESEEM study, however, shows the presence of a tryptophan at the A1 site, but no histidine is present (58). Hence, a re-evaluation of the 14N and 15N ESEEM data for the A1˙̄ radical in photosystem I is required to unambiguously identify the nitrogens involved in the interaction with the SQ.
Model of the SQ Environment in Cytochrome aa3-600
Based on the similarity of the amino acid sequences of cyt bo3 and cyt aa3-600, one can suggest that residues associated with the QH-site of cyt aa3-600 include Arg-70, Asp-74, His-94, and Glu-97 (B. subtilis numbering), which correspond to Arg-71, Asp-76, His-98, and Gln-101 in cyt bo3. Site-directed mutagenesis studies have confirmed that these four residues are functionally important in cyt bo3 and that mutants at each position alter or eliminate the SQ that is stabilized at the QH site (28). The glutamine (Gln-101) present at the QH-site in cyt bo3, is replaced by a glutamic acid (Glu-97) in cyt aa3-600 (Fig. 7).
FIGURE 7.
Model of the quinone binding at the QH site of the cyt aa3-600. The figure was generated according to the model based on the x-ray crystal structure of cytochrome bo3 by Abramson et al. (21) using VMD (59) and Swiss Model (60).
Among the four residues reasonably suggested as being at the QH-site, only Arg-70 and His-94 have side chain nitrogens that can participate in hydrogen bonding to the SQ. Hydrogen bonds between the SQ and peptide backbone nitrogens cannot be ruled out at this point, but there is no evidence for such hydrogen bonding at the QH-site of cyt bo3.
The uniform and selective 15N isotope labeling of the nitrogens in Arg-71, His-98, and Gln-101 of cyt bo3 has identified one nitrogen, Nϵ, of Arg-71, that carries the largest amount of the unpaired spin density, corresponding to the coupling 1.8 MHz. All other nitrogens, including the Nη from Arg-71 and ring nitrogens of His-98, possess smaller couplings of the order 0.1–0.6 MHz. There is no spin density transfer to the Nϵ of Gln-101, which is involved in only very weak anisotropic coupling with the electron spin of the SQ (3).
The 15N spectrum of the SQ in cyt aa3-600 shows a poorly resolved line-shape, which suggests an interaction with several nitrogens. The largest coupling estimated from the 14N spectrum is 0.9 MHz and can be tentatively assigned to the Nϵ of Arg-70 based on the quadrupole parameter, K2(3 + η2). In the 15N spectrum the largest resolved coupling, 15A, is ∼0.95 MHz. This corresponds to a coupling 14N of (i.e. 14A) of only ∼0.7 MHz, indicating an overlap of the spectra from at least two nitrogens, presumably from Arg-70 and His-94. It is possible that in cyt aa3-600 there is more spin density transferred to the nitrogens of His-94 than to the corresponding His-98 in cytochrome bo3. The mechanism of the transfer of unpaired spin density to His-98 in cyt bo3 or to His-94 in cyt aa3-600 is not clear. One can propose that spin density can be transferred from the menaquinone SQ to the histidine by either hydrogen bonding or, alternatively, by π-stacking of the menaquinone and the imidazole ring of His-94. If there were π-stacking then of course the model shown in Fig. 1 (based on cyt bo3 coordinates (21)) would need to be substantially revised. In either case, the nitrogen coupling data indicate a significant difference in the protein interactions with the SQs in cyt bo3 and cyt aa3-600. The spin density transfer to the QH-site arginine from oxygen O4 appears to be substantially weaker in cyt aa3-600, and the interaction of the histidine with oxygen O1 may be greater.
Differences in nitrogen couplings are also consistent with differences in the couplings of the exchangeable, hydrogen-bonded protons. Two strongly coupled exchangeable protons with |T| ∼ 6.3 and 4.2 MHz are found near the SQ in cyt bo3 (6). In cyt aa3-600 there are also two exchangeable protons, but with |T| = 5.6 and 2.9 MHz. The smaller hyperfine couplings are also consistent with weaker hydrogen bonding between protein residues to the SQ in cyt aa3-600.
Taken together, the nitrogen and proton hfi data indicate weaker hydrogen binding of the menaquinone SQ in cyt aa3-600 in comparison with the ubiquinone SQ in cyt bo3. In addition, the electronic structure of the SQ in cyt aa3-600 has more anionic character compared with the neutral SQ state in cyt bo3. However, the asymmetry of the distribution of unpaired spin density for MQ-7 in cyt aa3-600 is still substantially greater than observed for MQ-9 in the QA site of the bacterial reaction center from Rps. viridis (52), which is clearly an anionic SQ, as can be judged from the comparison of the methyl proton couplings (Table 2).
Additional studies are required to provide the necessary information to define the specifics of how the SQ of menaquinone-7 at the QH-site of cyt aa3-600 interacts with the surrounding protein. Both the protein (e.g. Gln-101 versus Glu-97) and the quinone (ubiquinone versus menaquinone) are different. Yet, the high degree of amino acid sequence identity indicates that the QH-sites must have common structural and functional properties for these two enzymes. The goal is to define the evolutionary adaptation of the protein structure to accommodate different quinones at the same location.
Supplementary Material
This work was supported, in whole or in part, by National Institutes of Health Grants GM062954 (to S. A. D.) and S10-RR15878 (National Center for Research Resources) for instrumentation. This work was also supported by Grants DE-FG02-08ER15960 (to S. A. D.) and DE-FG02-87ER13716 (to R. B. G.) from Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Sciences, United States Department of Energy.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1–S5, Table S1, and Equations 1 and 2.
- cyt aa3-600
- cytochrome aa3-600 menaquinol oxidase
- cyt bo3
- cytochrome bo3 ubiquinol oxidase from E. coli
- SQ
- semiquinone
- QH
- the high affinity quinone-binding site
- ESEEM
- electron spin echo envelope modulation
- HYSCORE
- hyperfine sublevel correlation
- ENDOR
- electron-nuclear double resonance
- hfi
- hyperfine interaction
- nqi
- nuclear quadrupole interaction
- DMN
- 2,3-dimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone
- HPCL
- high performance liquid chromatography
- mT
- millitesla
- MQ
- menaquinone
- MW
- microwave.
REFERENCES
- 1.Pereira M. M., Santana M., Teixeira M. (2001) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1505, 185–208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.García-Horsman J. A., Barquera B., Rumbley J., Ma J., Gennis R. B. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 5587–5600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lin M. T., Samoilova R. I., Gennis R. B., Dikanov S. A. (2008) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 15768–15769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yap L. L., Samoilova R. I., Gennis R. B., Dikanov S. A. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 8777–8785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.White G. F., Field S., Marritt S., Oganesyan V. S., Gennis R. B., Yap L. L., Katsonouri A., Thomson A. J. (2007) Biochemistry 46, 2355–2363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yap L. L., Samoilova R. I., Gennis R. B., Dikanov S. A. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 16879–16887 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kobayashi K., Tagawa S., Mogi T. (2009) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 73, 1599–1603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Matsumoto Y., Murai M., Fujita D., Sakamoto K., Miyoshi H., Yoshida M., Mogi T. (2006) J. Biol. Chem. 281, 1905–1912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Downey R. J. (1964) J. Bacteriol. 88, 904–911 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mattatall N. R., Cameron L. M., Hill B. C. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 13331–13341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lemma E., Schägger H., Kröger A. (1993) Arch. Microbiol. 159, 574–578 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fann Y. C., Ahmed I., Blackburn N. J., Boswell J. S., Verkhovskaya M. L., Hoffman B. M., Wikström M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 10245–10255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lauraeus M., Wikström M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11470–11473 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lauraeus M., Morgan J. E., Wikström M. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 2664–2670 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Santana M., Kunst F., Hullo M. F., Rapoport G., Danchin A., Glaser P. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10225–10231 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Villani G., Capitanio N., Bizzoca A., Palese L. L., Carlino V., Tattoli M., Glaser P., Danchin A., Papa S. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 2287–2294 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Welter R., Gu L. Q., Yu L., Yu C. A., Rumbley J., Gennis R. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28834–28838 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sato-Watanabe M., Mogi T., Ogura T., Kitagawa T., Miyoshi H., Iwamura H., Anraku Y. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 28908–28912 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sato-Watanabe M., Mogi T., Sakamoto K., Miyoshi H., Anraku Y. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 12744–12752 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ma J., Puustinen A., Wikström M., Gennis R. B. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 11806–11811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Abramson J., Riistama S., Larsson G., Jasaitis A., Svensson-Ek M., Laakkonen L., Puustinen A., Iwata S., Wikström M. (2000) Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 910–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sato-Watanabe M., Mogi T., Miyoshi H., Anraku Y. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 5356–5361 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mogi T., Sato-Watanabe M., Miyoshi H., Orii Y. (1999) FEBS Lett. 457, 61–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Puustinen A., Verkhovsky M. I., Morgan J. E., Belevich N. P., Wikstrom M. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 1545–1548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Matsuura K., Yoshioka S., Takahashi S., Ishimori K., Mogi T., Hori H., Morishima I. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 2288–2296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ingledew W. J., Ohnishi T., Salerno J. C. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 227, 903–908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sato-Watanabe M., Itoh S., Mogi T., Matsuura K., Miyoshi H., Anraku Y. (1995) FEBS Lett. 374, 265–269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hellwig P., Yano T., Ohnishi T., Gennis R. B. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 10675–10679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Grimaldi S., MacMillan F., Ostermann T., Ludwig B., Michel H., Prisner T. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 1037–1043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Grimaldi S., Ostermann T., Weiden N., Mogi T., Miyoshi H., Ludwig B., Michel H., Prisner T. F., MacMillan F. (2003) Biochemistry 42, 5632–5639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Winstedt L., von Wachenfeldt C. (2000) J. Bacteriol. 182, 6557–6564 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schweiger A., Jeschke G. (2001) Principles of Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance, pp. 359–405, Oxford University Press, Oxford [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lubtitz W., Feher G. (1999) Appl. Magn. Reson. 17, 1–48 [Google Scholar]
- 34.Veselov A. V., Osborne J. P., Gennis R. B., Scholes C. P. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 3169–3175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Grimaldi S., Lanciano P., Bertrand P., Blasco F., Guigliarelli B. (2005) Biochemistry 44, 1300–1308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dikanov S. A., Holland J. T., Endeward B., Kolling D. R., Samoilova R. I., Prisner T. F., Crofts A. R. (2007) J. Biol. Chem. 282, 25831–25841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dikanov S. A., Samoilova R. I., Kolling D. R., Holland J. T., Crofts A. R. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 15814–15823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dikanov S. A., Xun L., Karpiel A. B., Tyryshkin A. M., Bowman M. K. (1996) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 8408–8416 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dikanov S. A., Tsvetkov Yu. D., Bowman M. K., Astashkin A. V. (1982) Chem. Phys. Lett. 90, 149–153 [Google Scholar]
- 40.Safin I. A., Osokin D. Ya. (1977) Nuclear Quadupole Resonance in Nitrogen Compounds, Science, Moscow [Google Scholar]
- 41.Grimaldi S., Arias-Cartin R., Lanciano P., Lyubenova S., Endeward B., Prisner T. F., Magalon A., Guigliarelli B. (2010) J. Biol. Chem. 285, 179–187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.MacMillan F., Lendzian F., Lubitz W. (1995) Magn. Reson. Chem. 33, 581–593 [Google Scholar]
- 43.O'Malley P. J., Babcock G. T. (1986) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 3995–4001 [Google Scholar]
- 44.Flores M., Isaacson R. A., Calvo R., Feher G., Lubitz W. (2003) Chem. Phys. 294, 401–413 [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sinnecker S., Reijerse E., Neese F., Lubitz W. (2004) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3280–3290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Flores M., Isaacson R., Abresch E., Calvo R., Lubitz W., Feher G. (2007) Biophys. J. 92, 671–682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.O'Malley P. J. (1998) Chem. Phys. Lett. 291, 367–374 [Google Scholar]
- 48.Das M. R., Connor H. D., Leniart D. S., Freed J. H. (1970) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 92, 2258–2268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Teutloff Ch., Bittl R., Lubitz W. (2004) Appl. Magn. Reson. 26, 5–21 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rigby S. E.., Evans M. C., Heathcote P. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6651–6656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Epel B., Niklas J., Sinnecker S., Zimmermann H., Lubitz W. (2006) J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 11549–11560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gardiner A. T., Zech S. G., MacMillan F., Käss H., Bittl R., Schlodder E., Lendzian F., Lubitz W. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11773–11787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pushkar Yu. N., Stehlik D., van Gastel M., Lubitz W. (2004) J. Mol. Struct. 700, 233–241 [Google Scholar]
- 54.Niklas J., Epel B., Antonkine M. L., Sinnecker S., Pandelia M. E., Lubitz. W. (2009) J. Phys. Chem. B. 113, 10367–10379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hastings S. F., Heathcote P., Ingledew W. J., Rigby S. E. (2000) Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 5638–5645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.McConnell H. M. (1956) J. Chem. Phys. 24, 764–766 [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hanley J., Deligiannakis Y., MacMillan F., Bottin H., Rutherford A. W. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 11543–11549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jordan P., Fromme P., Witt H. T., Klukas O., Saenger W., Krauss N. (2001) Nature 411, 909–917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Humphrey W., Dalke A., Schulten K. (1996) J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Arnold K., Bordoli L., Kopp J., Schwede T. (2006) Bioinformatics 22, 195–201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






