Abstract
Fifty-five consecutive cases of Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), collected between 1996 and 1998 from Cairo, Egypt, were histologically subtyped, phenotyped, and then studied for the presence of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV). We used immunohistochemical stains for EBV latent membrane protein 1 (LMP-1) and in situ hybridization stains for EBV-encoded small RNA (EBER-1) transcripts. Forty-five cases (82%) had classic HL (cHL), and ten cases (18%) had nodular lymphocyte predominant HL (NLPHL), with each group expressing its typical phenotype. LMP-1 stains were positive in 63% and 0% of cHL and NLPHL cases, respectively. EBER-positive Reed–Sternberg cells and variants were also present in 62% and 0% of each group, respectively. The cHL cases showed variable EBER positivity: nodular sclerosis, 58%; mixed cellularity, 100%; lymphocyte depletion, 100%; and unclassifiable, 67%. Our findings are similar to those from other developing countries and point towards a pathogenic role of EBV in cHL.
Keywords: Classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Epstein–Barr virus, EBER-1, LMP-1
Introduction
The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) Classification Project involves an ongoing epidemiologic study, based on a retrospective review of slides in developed and developing countries all around the world, to determine the distribution of the various types of NHL. We reviewed 210 consecutive cases of malignant lymphoma in 1999 in Cairo, Egypt; of these, 55 cases were classified as Hodgkin’s lymphomas (HL), which form the basis for this study. The main goals of our study were to determine the frequency of EBV positivity for the various subtypes of HL and to compare our results with those reported in the literature in other regions of the world.
Materials and methods
The material for this study was obtained from a large, privately owned pathology laboratory in Cairo (Professor Dr. Elia Anis Ishak, Professor of Surgical Pathology, Cairo University Centre). All sequential cases of malignant lymphoma, including HL, with available paraffin blocks, received in his laboratory between 1996 and 1998 were retrieved and included in the study, as previously described [1]. The cases of HL were subtyped according to the WHO classification [2, 3].
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5-µm sections of archival, paraffin-embedded tissue using a three-step immunoperoxidase method with microwave pretreatment in citrate buffer (10 nM, pH 6) and antibodies against CD20 (L26), CD3, CD30 (Ber-H2), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA; E29), LMP-1 (EBV/CS 1/4; Dakopatts, Copenhagen, Denmark), and CD15 (80H5; Immunotech, Marseille, France).
In situ hybridization was also performed on paraffin sections using EBER-1 oligonucleotide FITC-conjugated probes (Biogenex, San Ramon, CA, USA). The results were classified as negative, positive only in small cells, positive in some large tumor cells, or positive in several large tumor cells with or without positive small cells.
Each case was separately studied by five experts (JD, K McL, HK M-H, BN, DW), and a consensus diagnosis was reached for each case when at least four of five experts agreed. This review was completed in 1999. Approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Nebraska Medical Center.
Results
Of the 210 consecutive cases of malignant lymphoma from Egypt, 55 cases (26%) were classified as HL and the remaining 155 (84%) as NHL. The age and sex of the HL patients were correlated with the various histological subtypes, as summarized in Table 1. There were 35 males (64%) and 20 females (36%). Eighty-two percent of the cases were classified as classic HL (cHL), and the remaining 18% were nodular lymphocyte predominant HL (NLPHL).
Table 1.
Classification of Hodgkin lymphoma | Age groups (years) | Sex | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
≤15 | 16–50 | ≥51 | Male | Female | |
Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL): 45 cases (82%) | 27 (60%) | 18 (40%) | |||
Nodular Sclerosis 38 cases (84%) | 7 | 23 | 8 | 25 | 13 |
Mixed cellularity 3 cases (9%) | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Lymphoid Depletion (1 case) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Unclassifiable 3 cases (7%) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Predominant Nodular Lymphocyte HL: 10 cases (18%) | 1 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 2 |
Total: 55 cases | 8 (14.6%) | 34 (61.8%) | 13 (23.6%) | 35 (64%) | 20 (36%) |
Classic Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Our study included 27 males (60%) and 18 females (40%), with a median age of 35 years and an age range of 2–69 years. Nodular sclerosis (NS) was, by far, the most common subtype (84%) of cHL (Table 1). Hodgkin’s cells expressed CD30 in all cases, and CD15 was expressed in 34 cases (75%; Table 2). Only seven cases (15%) of cHL had CD20-positive tumor cells, and the percentage of positive cells varied from 20% to 40%. Tumor cells were positive for LMP-1 in 63% of evaluable cases (Table 2). LMP-1 was detected in 60% of NS subtype cases and 100% of mixed cellularity (MC) and lymphocyte depletion (LD) subtype cases. Overall, EBER-1 was detected in 68% of the cHL cases and in 58% of NS cases (Table 2). Moreover, both tumor and small cells were also positive in 21 of 22 EBER-1-positive NS cases. Although EBER-1 was not detected in tumor cells in 16 NS cases, the small cells were positive for EBER-1 in nine of these cases and negative for EBER-1 in seven of these cases. In the four cases with MC and LD subtypes, both the tumor cells and small lymphoid cells were positive for EBER-1.
Table 2.
NS | MC and LD | Unclassifiable | Total cHL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CD30+ | 38 | 100% | 4 | 100% | 3 | 100% | 45 | 100% |
CD15+ | 28 | 74% | 4 | 100% | 2 | 67% | 34 | 75% |
CD20+ | 6 | 16% | 1 | 33% | 0 | 7 | 15% | |
LMP-1+ | 21 | 60% | 4 | 100% | 1 | 50% | 26a/41 | 63% |
LMP-1- | 14 | 40% | 0 | 1 | 50% | 15a/41 | 37% | |
EBER-1+ | 22 | 58% | 4 | 100% | 2 | 67% | 28/45 | 68% |
EBER-1- | 16 | 42% | 0 | 1 | 34% | 17/45 | 38% |
a For LMP-1, four cases are not shown in this Table 3 of NS type due to uninterpretable results and one unclassifiable case due to the lack of material
Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin’s lymphoma
Of the 55 cases of HL, 10 cases (18%) were classified as NLPHL. These NLPHL cases had a median age of 40.5 years, an age range of 12–53 years and were predominantly male (Table 1). The immunophenotype was typical, as the tumor cells expressed CD20 in all cases and were negative for CD30 and CD15 when performed. Immunostains for EMA were done in all cases, and the tumor cells were positive in eight cases (80%). EBER-1 was not detected in tumor cells in all cases but was detected in scattered small lymphocytes in four cases (40%). Staining for LMP-1 was performed in only two cases, and it was negative in both.
Discussion
As a part of an ongoing epidemiologic study of NHL, five pathologists (J D, K McL, HK M-H, B N, D W) reviewed about 200 consecutive cases of NHL from 12 international cities (Cairo, Johannesburg, Harare, Kuwait City, Bangkok, Mumbai, Riyadh, Jakarta, Guatemala City, Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires and Shanghai) and reached a consensus diagnosis for each case. The results of the above review of NHL cases will be published separately (Weisenburger et al., in preparation). The 210 consecutive cases of malignant lymphoma we reviewed in 1999 were collected from 1996 to 1998 in Cairo as a part of the abovementioned study. However, as Cairo also submitted cases of HL and NHL, this study deals with only the 55 cases in which a consensus diagnosis of HL was reached.
The relative frequency of HL was 26% (55 of 210 cases) of all malignant lymphoma, which is in agreement with the incidence of 30% reported in the 2008 WHO publication [3]. The relative frequency of cHL was 82% (45 of 55 cases) and that of NLPHL was 18% (10 of 55 cases), which is significantly higher than the 5% reported for this lymphoma in the WHO book [3] (Table 1). The reason for this higher NLPHL incidence is unknown. Also, the incidence of the NS type in our series was 84%, which is again higher than the 70% reported in the WHO book [3]. However, immunophenotypically, all of the cHL cases were CD30-positive, whereas 74% of cases were positive for CD15 and 85% were negative for CD20, which is in agreement with the WHO book [3]. In addition, LMP-1 was detected in 63% and EBER-1 was detected in 68% of cases (Table 2). LMP-1 was detected in 60% and EBER-1 was detected in 58% of NS subtype cases, which is higher than that reported in the WHO book [3].
EBV infection has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cHL [32, 40, 45, 46] but not in that of NLPHL, thus leading several investigators from all over the world to report on how often LMP-1 and EBER-1 are detected in lymphoma samples in their own institutions/countries. We, therefore, compared our EBV results with those reported in the literature by grouping together countries according to geographical location for both adults (Table 3) and children (Table 4). This comparison showed major differences in the percentages of EBV-positive HL cases in the various countries and regions. The highest percentages of positive cases were from developing countries and children. The variability in the range of EBV-positive adult cases with HL in various regions of the developing world is summarized (Table 3):
Middle East (including Tunisia) [4–12]: between 28% of cases in a series from Jordan [12] and 70% of cases from Tunisia [4] were EBV-positive with HL; for Egypt [8], 50% were positive and 67% were of the NS type, which is similar to our findings
East Africa [13–16]: between 44% and 92% of cases were positive in Kenya
Central and South America [17–23]: between 31% of cases in Argentina [23] and 84% of cases in Peru [17] were positive
Asia [14, 24–30]: between 39% of cases in China [30] and 82% of cases in India [24] were positive, and the percentage of positive cases in most other countries was high (50% to 69%).
Table 3.
cHL (%) | NS (%) | MC (%) | LD (%) | NLPHL (%) | TOTAL (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mediterranean Countries, Middle East | ||||||
Tunisia 2002 [4] | 72 | 69 | 87 | 100 | 0 | 70 |
Turkey 2008 [5] | – | – | 91 | – | – | 61 |
Saudi Arabia 2001 [6] | 56 | – | 56 | – | – | 56 |
Kuwait 2003[7] | 60 | 34 | 79 | 100 | 25 | 56 |
Egypt 1996 [8] | 60 | 67 | 57 | 0 | 50 | 50 |
Saudi Arabia 1998 [9] | 54 | 47 | 88 | – | 0 | 47 |
Jordan 2004 [10] | 47 | 29 | 60 | – | 0 | 47 |
Israel 1997 [11] | 30 | 22 | 45 | – | – | 30 |
Jordan 2004 [12] | 28 | 19 | 57 | – | – | 28 |
East Africa | ||||||
Kenya 1996 [13] | 94 | 87 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 92 |
Kenya 1998 [14] | 80 | 57 | 85 | 80 | 67 | 79 |
Kenya 1996 [15] | 67 | 69 | 100 | 50 | 33 | 68 |
Kenya 1997 [16] | – | – | – | – | – | 44 |
Central and South America | ||||||
Peru 1993 [17] | 84 | 100 | 100 | 50 | – | 84 |
Mexico 1995 [18] | 70 | 50 | 81 | 86 | – | 70 |
Mexico 1995 [19] | 69 | 46 | 100 | 83 | 0 | 67 |
Argentina 1994-2004 [20] | 52 | 50 | 62 | 0 | – | 52 |
Puerto Rico 2003 [21] | 50 | – | – | – | – | 50 |
Costa Rica 1998 [22] | 43 | 15 | 86 | 100 | 0 | 40 |
Argentina 2003 [23] | 32 | 24 | 39 | 100 | 0 | 31 |
Asia | ||||||
India 2003 [24] | 82 | 86 | – | – | – | 82 |
Korea 1996 [25] | 70 | 59 | 74 | 64 | 57 | 69 |
Taiwan 1998 [26] | 67 | 64 | 69 | 100 | 0 | 66 |
Japan 1996 [27] | 64 | 44 | 84 | – | – | 64 |
Japan 1998 [14] | 56 | 36 | 67 | 71 | 67 | 58 |
Malaysia 1997 [28] | 61 | 33 | 92 | 50 | 0 | 51 |
Taiwan 2008 [29] | 50 | – | – | – | – | 50 |
China 2001 [30] | 39 | 25 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 39 |
Europe | ||||||
Greece 1996 [8] | 89 | 92 | 86 | – | 100 | 91 |
Switzerland 1992 [31] | 79 | – | – | – | – | 79 |
Italy 1996 [13] | 58 | 45 | 92 | 100 | 0 | 56 |
Germany 1992 [32] | 48 | 41 | 55 | 50 | 100 | 49 |
Bosnia 2007 [33] | 48 | – | – | – | – | 48 |
Hungary 2006 [34] | 43 | 35 | 50 | – | – | 43 |
Spain 2000 [35] | 41 | – | – | – | – | 41 |
France 1992 [36] | 39 | 10 | 60 | – | 0 | 35 |
U.K. 1994 [37] | 33 | 44 | 35 | – | – | 33 |
Belgium 2007 [38] | – | – | – | – | – | 33 |
UK 2003 [39] | 33 | 24 | 60 | – | – | 33 |
UK 1993 [40] | 37 | 24 | 68 | 14 | 0 | 32 |
Sweden 1999 [41] | 27 | 23 | 38 | 100 | 20 | 27 |
USA and Australia | ||||||
USA 1989 [42] | 68 | 57 | 92 | 100 | 0 | 65 |
USA 1994 [43] | 47 | 27 | 77 | – | – | 47 |
USA 2004 [12] | 30 | 14 | 75 | – | – | 30 |
USA 1994 [44] | 28 | 14 | 69 | 66 | 0 | 25 |
Australia 1996 [8] | 73 | 73 | 100 | – | 0 | 69 |
For each country, the first column shows the number (n°) of cases studied whereas the other columns show the percentages of positive cases. For each region of the world, the countries have been organized according to the percentage of positive cases studied, from the highest to the lowest. For each series, the reference for the publication is given after the year of publication
– absence of case, 0 no EBV-positive case
Table 4.
CHL (%) | NS (%) | MC (%) | LD (%) | NLPHL (%) | TOTAL (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peru 1993 [17] | 100 | 100 | 100 | – | – | 100 |
Honduras 1993 [47] | 100 | 100 | 100 | – | 100 | 100 |
Kenya 1996 [15] | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
China 2001 [30] | – | – | – | – | – | – |
≤ 5 years | – | – | – | – | – | 97 |
6–10 years | – | – | – | – | – | 93 |
11–14 years | – | – | – | – | – | 54 |
India 2007 [48] | 97 | – | – | – | – | 97 |
Vietnam 2005 [49] | 93 | – | – | – | 100 | 93 |
Thailand 2005 [50] | 93 | 75 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 87 |
Brazil 2006 [51] | 94 | 83 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 87 |
Czechoslovakia 2000 [52] | 83 | 60 | 100 | – | – | 83 |
South Africa 2009 [53] | 68 | 67 | 80 | – | – | 68 |
Argentina 2003 [23] | 57 | 28 | 77 | 75 | 0 | 55 |
Argentina 1995 [54] | 57 | 0 | 76 | 100 | 33 | 53 |
2–6 years | – | – | – | – | – | 80 |
7–15 years | – | – | – | – | – | 33 |
U.K. 1992 [55] | 54 | 40 | 84 | 40 | 36 | 51 |
United Arab Emirates 2008 [56] | – | – | – | – | – | 38 |
USA 1993 [47] | 39 | 19 | 86 | – | 0 | 36 |
UK 1993 [57] | – | 54 | 33 | – | – | 35 |
For each country, the first column shows the number (n°) of cases studied whereas the other columns show the percentages of positive cases. For each region of the world, the countries have been organized according to the percentage of positive cases studied, from the highest to the lowest. For each series, the reference for the publication is given after the year of publication
– absence of case, 0 no EBV-positive case
The frequency of EBV-positive HL in most countries in the developed world was lower for adults than that in the developing world (Table 3):
Europe [8, 13, 31–41]; between 27% of cases in Sweden [41] and 56% of cases in Italy [13] were positive, with a higher rate in two reports: 79% in Switzerland [31] and 91% in Greece [8]
Australia [8]: a high frequency of positive cases (69%).
For children (Table 4), the frequency of EBV-positive cases was very high—ranging from 83% to 100%—in the nine developing countries [15, 30, 47–52]. This is in contrast to the low frequencies (35% to 38%) found in the USA [47], the United Arab Emirates [56], and the UK [57]. The age of the children studied was also important, as shown by Zhou et al. [30] in China and by Preciado et al. [54] in Argentina. In pediatric cases of HL, Chabay et al. [58] reported a predominance of the MC subtype (52%) in children in 54 cases of HL from Argentina, in contrast to the NS subtype being the major subtype (83%) in 48 cases of HL from Brazil, and indicated that most of the cases were EBV-positive in both countries.
Differences are also observed between developed and undeveloped areas within the same country, as shown by reports from Brazil [51, 59] (Table 5). Differences in the percentage of positive cases of cHL may be explained by various ethnic communities with different socioeconomic environments [12, 42–44, 47, 59–62]. Improvement in the socioeconomic environment may also explain differences observed in the same country over time. For example, Chang et al. [29] recently compared the frequency of histological subtypes and the percentage of cases testing positive for EBV in two groups of patients in Taiwan, one comprising HL cases collected between 1982 and 1995 (74 cases) and the other comprising HL cases collected between 1996 and 2007 (99 cases). Overall, a large proportion of patients were male (2.3:1) and the mean age at presentation was 41.5 years. The overall frequency of EBV positivity was 50% (86/173 cases). This comparison demonstrated a change in the distribution of HL subtypes observed in the two time periods with an increased frequency of the NS subtype between 1996 and 2007 (53% vs. 68%) and a decreased frequency of the MC subtype (35% vs. 13%). They also observed a reduced male-to-female ratio (2.9:1 vs. 1.4:1) and a reduced mean age (42.4 vs. 36.6 years) in NS subtype cases, including a significant decrease in EBV positivity (61% vs. 39%), between 1996 and 2007. These results show that the most recent findings from Taiwan closely follow those reported in Japan and other Western countries, and may be interpreted as a change in the epidemiology of cHL associated with improved socioeconomic conditions.
Table 5.
cHL (%) | NS (%) | MC (%) | LD (%) | NLPHL (%) | TOTAL (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Developed areas | ||||||
<20 years | 65 | 25 | 76 | – | 0 | 54 |
>20 years | 58 | 0 | 100 | 0 | – | 56 |
Undeveloped areas | ||||||
<20 years | 82 | 40 | 100 | 100 | – | 85 |
>20 years | 31 | 38 | 35 | 0 | – | 31 |
As there is a high incidence of EBV-positive HL in the pediatric age group, the number of pediatric cases included in the various studies may influence the overall EBV positivity rate. The percentage of EBV-associated pediatric cHL (Table 4) ranged from 51% of EBV-associated cHL in one series from the UK [55] to 100% in Peru [17], Honduras [47], and Kenya [15], with the percentages in six other countries ranging from 83–97% [30, 48–51].
In our study, all ten cases of NLPHL were negative for EBER-1. However, some cases showed scattered EBER-positive small lymphocytes, which are probably representative of the number of EBV-positive circulating (background) lymphocytes. In most of the studies reviewed, there was a low frequency of EBV in NLPHL [36, 43, 45–47]; however, others reported a higher frequency, but only a few cases were studied [25, 27, 55]. NLPHL is now well defined by histological and immunohistochemical criteria under the WHO classification [2, 3]. Therefore, before we can accept that cases of NLPHL are associated with EBV infection, strict diagnostic criteria need to be applied.
In our study, 38/45 cases of cHL (84%) and 4/10 cases of NLPHL (40%) showed EBV-positive small lymphocytes [62]. Other studies only report EBV-positive small lymphocytes in cases with EBV-positive tumor cells or adult cases [17, 63]. By contrast, we observed EBV-positive small lymphocytes with or without positive tumor cells, in both the pediatric and adult groups. The extent of small lymphocyte positivity also varied among the cases. Twenty-two percent of our cases had an abundance of EBER-1-positive small lymphocytes, consistent with the report by Herbst et al. [44]. Masih et al. [63] used this finding to argue against the theory of “exclusive” localization of EBV in tumor cells and raised the issue as to whether EBV within tumor cells was a primary or secondary phenomenon. Also, since EBV is a ubiquitous lymphotropic virus, it is to be expected that small lymphocytes can frequently be positive.
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Martin Bast from the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska, Omaha, USA, for his support and Serge Bain, Véronique Ducruit, and Catherine Belorgey from the Department of Pathology, Hôtel Dieu Hospital, Paris, France, for their technical help.
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.This work has not been published before and is not under consideration for publication anywhere else. Its publication has been approved by all co-authors.
Footnotes
This manuscript has not been published before and is not under consideration for publication anywhere else. Its publication has been approved by all co-authors.
References
- 1.The Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Classification Project A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group Classification of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Blood. 1997;89:3909–3918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW (eds) (2001) World health organization classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. IARC, Lyon
- 3.Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri EA, Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW (eds) (2008) World health organization classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, Chap 12. IARC, Lyon, pp 322–334
- 4.Korbi S, Trimeche M, Sriha B, et al. Virus d’Epstein-Barr et maladie de Hodgkin: l’exemple du centre Tunisien. Ann Pathol. 2002;22:96–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yilmaz F, Uzunlar AK, Sogutcu N, et al. Hodgkin’s disease and association with Epstein-Barr virus in children in Southeast Turkey. Saudi Med J. 2005;26:571–575. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kandil A, Bazarbashi S, Mourad W. The correlation of Epstein-Barr virus expression and lymphocyte subsets with the clinical presentation of nodular sclerosing Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 2001;91:1957–1963. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010601)91:11<1957::AID-CNCR1220>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Makar RR, Saji T, Junaid TA. Epstein-Barr virus expression in Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Kuwait. Pathol Oncol Res. 2003;9:159–165. doi: 10.1007/BF03033730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weinreb M, Day PJ, Niggli F, et al. The role of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin’s disease from different geographical areas. Arch Dis Child. 1996;74:27–31. doi: 10.1136/adc.74.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mourad W, Alsohaibani MO, Saddik M, et al. Epstein-Barr virus expression in Hodgkin’s disease: correlation with histologic subtypes and T and B lymphocyte distribution. Ann Saudi Med. 1998;18:296–300. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.1998.296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Almasri NM, Khalidi HS. Epstein-Barr virus expression in Hodgkin’s disease in Jordan. Saudi Med J. 2004;25:770–775. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Benhaarroch DBP, Goldstein J, Prinsloo I, et al. Association of the Epstein-Barr virus with Hodgkin’s disease in southern Israel. Int J Cancer. 1997;71:138–141. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970410)71:2<138::AID-IJC2>3.0.CO;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Vasef MA, Ubaidat MA, Khalidi HS, et al. Association between Epstein-Barr virus and classic Hodgkin lymphoma in Jordan: a comparative study with Epstein-Barr virus-associated Hodgkin lymphoma in North America. South Med J. 2004;97:272–277. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000090035.09019.8D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leoncini L, Spina D, Nyong A, et al. Neoplastic cells of Hodgkin’s disease show differences in EBV expression between Kenya and Italy. Int J Cancer. 1996;65:781–784. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19960315)65:6<781::AID-IJC13>3.0.CO;2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kusuda M, Toriyama K, Kamidigo NO, et al. A comparison of epidemiologic, histologic, and virologic studies on Hodgkin’s disease in Western Kenya and Nagasaki, Japan. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:801–807. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1998.59.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weinreb M, Niggli F, Green EK, et al. The consistent association between Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin’s disease in children in Kenya. Blood. 1996;87:3828–3836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cool CD. The malignant lymphomas in Kenya: Morphology immunophenotype, and frequency of Epstein-Barr virus in 73 cases. Hum Pathol. 1997;28:1026–1033. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(97)90055-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chang KL, Albujar PF, Chen Y, et al. High prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus in the Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease occurring in Peru. Blood. 1993;81:496–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Quintanilla-Martinez L, Gamboa-Domnquez A, Gamez-Ledesma I, et al. Association of Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein and Hodgkin’s disease in Mexico. Mod Pathol. 1995;8:675–679. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zarate-Osorno A, Roman LN, Kingma DW, et al. Prevalence of Epstein-Barr virus sequences and correlation with histologic type. Cancer. 1995;75:1360–1366. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950315)75:6<1360::AID-CNCR2820750619>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Besuschio S, Molina T, Tourneau A, et al. Frequency of EBV latent infection in a series of 103 Hodgkin lymphoma cases from Argentina. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifico Argentina. 2004;233:5–20. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cordova Pérez FJ, Gonzalez-Keelan CI, Vélez R. Epstein-Barr virus in biopsies from patients with Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the University of Puerto Rico immunohistochemistry laboratory. P R Health Sci J. 2003;22:125–129. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Monterosso V, Zhou Y, Koo S, et al. Hodgkin’s disease in Costa Rica: a report of 40 cases analyzed for Epstein-Barr virus. Am J Clin Pathol. 1998;109:618–624. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/109.5.618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Matteo E, Baron AV, Chabay P, et al. Comparison of Epstein-Barr virus presence in Hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric versus adult Argentine patients. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:1325–1329. doi: 10.5858/2003-127-1325-COEVPI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Karnik S, Srinivasan B, Nair S. Hodgkin’s lymphoma: immunohistochemical features and its association with EBV LMP-1. Experience from a South Indian hospital. Pathology. 2003;35:207–211. doi: 10.1080/0031302031000123164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huh J, Park C, Juhng S, Kim CE, et al. A pathologic study of Hodgkin’s disease in Korea and its association with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Cancer. 1996;77:949–955. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960301)77:5<949::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Liu SM, Chow KC, Chiu CF, et al. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus in patients with Hodgkin’s disease in Taiwan. Cancer. 1998;83:367–371. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980715)83:2<367::AID-CNCR22>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tomita Y, Ohsawa M, Kanno H, Hashimoto M, et al. Epstein–Barr virus in Hodgkin’s disease patients in Japan. Cancer. 1996;77:186–192. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960101)77:1<186::AID-CNCR30>3.0.CO;2-#. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Peh SC, Looi L, Pallesen G. Epstein-Barr (EBV) and Hodgkin’s disease in a multi-ethnic population in Malaysia. Histopathology. 1997;30:227–233. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.d01-594.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chang KC, Chen PC, Jones D, et al. Changing patterns in the frequency of Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes and Epstein-Barr virus association in Taiwan. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:345–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00667.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zhou XG, Sandvej K, Li PJ, et al. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in Chinese pediatric Hodgkin disease. Cancer. 2001;92:1621–1631. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010915)92:6<1621::AID-CNCR1488>3.0.CO;2-P. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Knecht H, Odermatt BF, Bachmann E, et al. Frequent detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA by the polymerase chain reaction in lymph node biopsies from patients with Hodgkin’s disease without genomic evidence of B- or T-cell clonality. Blood. 1991;78:760–767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Herbst H, Steinbercher E, Niedobitek G, Young L, et al. Distribution and phenotype of Epstein–Barr virus-harboring cells in Hodgkin’s disease. Blood. 1992;80:484–491. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cickusic E, Mustedanagic-Mujanovic J, Iljazovic E, et al. Association of Hodgkin’s lymphoma with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2007;7:58–65. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2007.3092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Keresztes K, Miltenyi Z, Bessenyei B, et al. Association between the Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the North-Eastern part of Hungary: effects on therapy and survival. Acta Haematol. 2006;116:101–107. doi: 10.1159/000093639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bosch Princep R, Alvaro Naranjo T, Balanza Roure R, et al. Hodgkin’s disease Etiopathogenic role of Epstein-Barr virus in Tarragona. Med Clin (Barc) 2000;114:411–413. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7753(00)71315-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Delsol G, Brousset P, Chittal S, et al. Correlation of the expression of Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein and in situ hybridization with biotynilated BamH1-W probes in Hodgkin’s disease. Am J Pathol. 1992;140:247–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.O’Grady J, Stewart S, Elton RA, et al. Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin’s disease and site of origin of tumour. Lancet. 1994;343:265–266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(94)91114-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Trimeche M, Bonnet C, Korbi S, et al. Association between Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Belgium: a pathological and virological study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007;48:1323–1331. doi: 10.1080/10428190701411177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jarrett RF, Krajewski AS, Angus B, et al. The Scotland and Newcastle epidemiological study of Hodgkin’s disease: impact of histopathological review and EBV status on incidence estimates. J Clin Pathol. 2003;56:811–816. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.11.811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khan G, Norton AJ, Slavin G. Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin disease. Relation to age and subtype. Cancer. 1993;71:3124–3129. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930515)71:10<3124::AID-CNCR2820711038>3.0.CO;2-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Enblad G, Sandvej K, Sundstrom C, et al. Epstein-Barr virus distribution in Hodgkin’s disease in an unselected Swedish population. Acta Oncol. 1999;38:425–429. doi: 10.1080/028418699431942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Weiss LM, Movahed LA, Warnke RA, et al. Detection of Epstein-Barr viral genomes in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:502–506. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198902233200806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gully ML, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Picado AJ, et al. Epstein-Barr virus DNA is abundant and monoclonal in the Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease: association with mixed cellularity subtype and Hispanic American ethnicity. Blood. 1994;83:1595–1602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pinkus GS, Lones M, Shintaku IP, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein in Reed-Sternberg cells and variants of Hodgkin’s disease. Mod Pathol. 1994;7:454–461. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Glaser SL, Lin RJ, Stewart SL, Ambinder RF, et al. Epstein–Barr virus-associated Hodgkin’s disease: epidemiologic characteristics in international data. Int J Cancer. 1997;70:375–382. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970207)70:4<375::AID-IJC1>3.0.CO;2-T. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pallesen G, Hamilton-Dutoit SJ, Rowe M, Young S. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus latent gene products in tumor cells of Hodgkin’s disease. Lancet. 1991;337:320–322. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90943-J. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ambinder RF, Browning P, Lorenzana I, Levental BF, et al. Epstein-Barr virus and childhood Hodgkin’s disease in Honduras and the United States. Blood. 1993;81:462–467. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Dinand V, Dawar R, Arya LS, et al. Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Indian children: prevalence and significance of Epstein-Barr virus detection in Hodgkin’s and Reed-Sternberg cells. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chang KC, Chen NT, Jones D, et al. Epstein-Bar virus is associated with all histological subtypes of Hodgkin lymphoma in Vietnamese children with special emphasis on the entity of lymphocyte predominance subtype. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:747–755. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hemsrichart V, Pintong J. Association of the Epstein-Barr viruses with Hodgkin lymphoma: an analysis of pediatric cases in Thailand. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:782–787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Araujo I, Bittencourt AL, Barbosa HS, et al. The high frequency of EBV infection in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma is related to related to the classical type in Bahia, Brazil. Virchows Arch. 2006;449:315–319. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0244-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Macàk J, Plank L, Habanec B, et al. EBV-positive Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children under 10 years. Vnitr Lék. 2000;46:387–390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Engel M, Essop MF, Close P, et al. Improved prognosis of Epstein-Barr virus associated childhood Hodgkin’s lymphoma: study of 47 South African cases. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:182–186. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.3.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Preciado MV, Matteo E, Driez B, et al. Presence of Epstein-Barr virus and strain type assignment in Argentine childhood Hodgkin’s disease. Blood. 1995;86:3922–3929. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Weinreb M, Murray PG, Raafat F, et al. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Hodgkin’s disease in children: incidence of EBV latent membrane protein in malignant cells. J Pathol. 1992;168:365–369. doi: 10.1002/path.1711680405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Al Salam S, John A, Daoud S, et al. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin lymphoma in a population of United Arab Emirates nationals. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49:1769–1777. doi: 10.1080/10428190802270894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Armstrong AA, Paes RP, Morad NA, et al. Association of Epstein-Barr virus with pediatric Hodgkin’s disease. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1683–1688. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Chabay PA, Barros MH, Hassan R, et al. Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma in 2 South American series: a distinctive epidemiologic pattern and lack of association of Epstein-Barr virus with clinical outcome. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2002;30:285–291. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181647bc3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Oliveira DE, Bacchi MM, Abreu ES, et al. Hodgkin disease in adult and juvenile groups from two different geographic regions in Brazil. Characterization of clinicopathologic aspects and relationship with Epstein-Barr virus infection. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002;118:25–30. doi: 10.1309/QFCB-PY52-BYR8-CGFC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chan JKC, Yip T, Tsang WYW, Lau WH, et al. Detection Epstein–Barr virus in of Hodgkin’s disease occuring in Oriental population. Human Pathol. 1995;23:314–318. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(95)90064-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Murray PG, Young L, Rowe M, Crocker J. Immunohistochemical demonstration of the Epstein-Barr virus-encoded latent membrane protein in paraffin sections of Hodgkin’s disease. J Pathol. 1992;166:1–5. doi: 10.1002/path.1711660102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Khan G, Gupta RK, Kangro HO, et al. Presence of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin’s disease is not exclusive to Reed-Sternberg cells. Am J Pathol. 1992;140:757–762. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Masih A, Weisenburger D, Duggan M, et al. Epstein-Barr viral genome in lymph nodes from patients with Hodgkin’s disease may not be specific to Reed-Sternberg cells. Am J Pathol. 1991;139:37–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gutensohn NM, Cole P. Childhood social environment and Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:135–141. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198101153040302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]