Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2010 Mar 24;48(6):2307–2310. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00409-10

USA600 (ST45) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections in Urban Detroit

Carol L Moore 1,2, Paola Osaki-Kiyan 1,2, MaryBeth Perri 1,2, Susan Donabedian 1,2, Nadia Z Haque 1,2, Anne Chen 1,2, Marcus J Zervos 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC2884493  PMID: 20335422

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a major source of invasive infections, implicated in 18,000 deaths annually (9). Mortality rates of 20 to 30% for patients with MRSA bloodstream infections (BSIs) have been reported, with a recent study, spanning 15 years, reporting a mortality rate of approximately 28% (11, 12, 17). Recently, we reported 60% mortality for a small number of MRSA BSIs caused by the USA600 strain type, suggesting that this strain may have unique virulence characteristics (5). USA600, or ST45, first reported as an epidemic strain spreading throughout Germany and the Netherlands in the last decade, has not been associated previously with serious infection (19-21). Given our preliminary findings, we investigated a series of consecutive cases of USA600 MRSA BSI to describe patient-, treatment-, and strain-related characteristics of the infections.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis of 420 consecutive MRSA bloodstream isolates was performed, and 16 patients with USA600 MRSA BSIs were identified between July 2005 and July 2008 at a 900-bed tertiary care hospital in Detroit, MI (Fig. 1). During the study period, 65% of all S. aureus infections were caused by MRSA. The source of the BSI was identified by chart review using a combination of clinical and laboratory findings and other diagnostic tests according to CDC definitions (7). Epidemiologic classification was conducted based on the presence or absence of health care risk factors and determination of whether the infection was community or hospital acquired, as described previously (8a). The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score was calculated for each patient upon presentation of infection (10). Thirty-day mortality was defined as mortality occurring within the 30 days following collection of the index culture sample. Microbiologic failure was defined by the growth of MRSA in a blood culture ≥10 days after collection of the index culture sample, while the patient was still on therapy. Clinical failure was defined by 30-day mortality and/or microbiologic failure. According to similar definitions, the overall clinical failure rate for patients with MRSA BSIs at our institution during the study period was 23% (5).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

PFGE patterns for the USA600 MRSA isolates.

Each USA600 isolate underwent PFGE, staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec element (SCCmec), and agr typing and testing for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) as described previously (3, 4). In vitro susceptibility testing was performed according to standards set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (4). Vancomycin MICs were determined by Etest (bioMerieux, Durham, NC) and manual broth microdilution (BMD) (4). Vancomycin minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined using previously established methods (4, 14), and vancomycin tolerance was defined by an MBC/MIC ratio of at least 1:32 after 24 h of incubation. Isolates were tested for the heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA) phenotype by using the macrodilution Etest (MET; bioMerieux, Durham, NC) as described previously (22). Isolates positive for the hVISA phenotype by this method underwent population analysis as described previously (6). Each method was performed in duplicate to confirm findings.

Clinical characteristics, therapy approaches, outcomes, and vancomycin susceptibility results are reported in Table 1. Thirty-day mortality, microbiologic failure, and clinical failure rates were 50, 31, and 75%, respectively. The majority (69%) of patients were female, and patients had a mean age (± standard deviation [±SD]) of 64 (±19) years and a mean (±SD) APACHE II score of 20 (±7) points at presentation. Comorbid conditions included diabetes (in 63% of patients), cardiovascular disease (69%), kidney disease (19%), a condition requiring hemodialysis (31%), liver disease (6%), a neurologic condition (32%), chronic obstructive lung disease (25%), malignancy (6%), immunosuppression (25%), and HIV infection (6%). Other conditions and factors present at baseline were acute renal failure (44%), previous hospital admission (56%), a history of surgery within 30 days (19%), nursing home residence (38%), and intravenous drug abuse (0%). Antimicrobials to which patients had been exposed in the previous 90 days included any (for 56% of patients), vancomycin (25%), fluoroquinolone (25%), a beta-lactam (19%), cephalosporin (13%), linezolid (13%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (13%), an aminoglycoside (13%), and a macrolide (13%). Epidemiologic classifications of infections were community acquired (6%), health care-associated community acquired (75%), and hospital onset (19%).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics and outcomes of USA600 MRSA BSIsa

Patient no. Patient age (yr), sex Source of BSI APACHE II score Treatment(s) (day[s])b DOB (days) V MIC (μg/ml) for infecting strain by Etest V MIC (μg/ml) for infecting strain by BMD V MBC (μg/ml) for infecting strain Infecting strain identified as V tolerant Infecting strain identified as hVISA by:
Outcome for patient/comments
MET POP
1 56, M Pneumonia 16 V (3-18) 1 2 0.5 0.5 No Yes Yes Died (day 45)
2 60, F Endocarditis 24 V (1-11) 5 2 1 2 No Yes Yes Died (day 11)
3 86, M Pneumonia 22 V+T (1-6), V (6-8) 1 1.5 0.5 ≥32 Yes No NT Died (day 8)
4 75, F Infected graft 20 V+G (1-6), V (6-42) 4 1.5 0.5 ≥32 Yes Yes No Had graft removed on day 6; died (day 100)
5 41, F Unknown NA NA (patient was dead on arrival at emergency room) NA 1.5 0.5 16 Yes Yes No Died (day 1)
6 89, F Genitourinary system 32 V (2-3) 1 2 0.5 ≥32 Yes Yes No Withdrew from care; died (day 8)
7 83, F Pneumonia 38 V+T (1), C (1-2) 1 1.5 0.5 ≥32 Yes No NT Died (day 2)
8 77, F Skin/wound 18 V (1-6) 1 2 0.5 0.5 No No NT Died (day 6)
9 54, M Endocarditis 23 V (1-10) 13 2 0.5 ≥32 Yes Yes No Experienced microbiologic failure; died (day 13)
10 44, F Catheter 20 L+G (1-5), D (5-7), V (7-38) 1 1.5 0.5 0.5 No No NT Treated successfully
11 98, F Genitourinary system 14 L (1-3), V (3-38) 25 1.5 0.5 0.5 No No NT Experienced microbiologic failure; died (day 62)
12 55, F Skin/wound 14 V (2-15), TS (4-7) 11 1.5 0.5 ≥32 Yes Yes Yes Experienced microbiologic failure
13 65, M Osteomyelitis 19 V (1-4), D (4-22), R (8-26), G (10-14), V (26-29), L (29-70) 18 1.5 0.5 ≥32 Yes No NT Experienced microbiologic failure
14 62, M Infected pacemaker 13 D (1-8), R (1-4), TS (4-8) 7 3 2 2 No Yes Yes Had pacemaker removed on day 7; died (day 9)
15 38, F LVAD 12 V (1-10), D (10-13), R (8-13), G (8-13)c 258 1.5 0.5 0.5 No No NT Experienced microbiologic failure; died (day 258)
16 34, F Skin/wound 12 V (1-14) 1 1.5 0.5 ≥32 Yes No NT Treated successfully
a

Abbreviations: DOB, duration of bacteremia; POP, population analysis; NA, not applicable; NT, not tested; LVAD, left ventricular assist device; V, vancomycin; T, tobramycin; G, gentamicin; C, clindamycin; L, linezolid; D, daptomycin; TS, TMP-SMX; and R, rifampin.

b

Of 14 patients treated with vancomycin, 8 did not have serum vancomycin concentrations recorded (5 were on hemodialysis, 2 received treatment for <48 h, and data for 1 were not available). The initial (≤48-h) vancomycin serum troughs of the six remaining patients were 10 to 15 μg/ml (n = 4) and >15 μg/ml (n = 2). The definitive (>48-h) vancomycin serum troughs were 10 to 15 μg/ml (n = 1) and >15 μg/ml (n = 4); data for the remaining patient (n = 1) were not available. Numbers in parentheses are days postpresentation on which treatment was received.

c

Antibiotics from the first hospitalization are reported in the table. The patient was treated consecutively for 258 days with the following agents: vancomycin, daptomycin, rifampin, TMP-SMX, linezolid, and quinupristin-dalfopristin.

None of the USA600 isolates were susceptible to clindamycin or erythromycin, 60% were susceptible to TMP-SMX, and 75% were susceptible to gentamicin. All isolates were susceptible in vitro to vancomycin by BMD, whereas one isolate was intermediate by Etest. For the majority (53%) of isolates, the vancomycin MBC was ≥32 μg/ml, and 60% were tolerant for vancomycin. Fifty percent of USA600 MRSA isolates tested positive for the hVISA phenotype by the MET method. Four of these 8 isolates demonstrated the hVISA phenotype by population analysis. Molecular analysis revealed that 15 strains had SCCmec type II and agr-1 and that one isolate had SCCmec type IVa and agr-1. All isolates were PVL negative.

This initial report describes a series of BSIs caused by USA600 MRSA. Although USA600 MRSA BSI was uncommon, we found high rates of mortality and clinical failure relative to previously reported outcomes for MRSA BSI (11, 12, 17). This case sample was not adequate to evaluate the effects of different antimicrobial strategies or the contribution of vancomycin serum trough concentrations in serum. However, most patients were treated with vancomycin, a drug to which half of the isolates were heteroresistant by MET, which could partially explain the poor outcomes. A previous case series study reported a rate of mortality from hVISA infection of approximately 40%, attributed mainly to two PFGE strain types, neither of which was USA600 (8). Another hospital in the Detroit area reported a mortality rate of 33% for hVISA BSIs, which was not significantly different from that for the non-hVISA BSIs (13). This pattern was also shown in a study of a small series of infective endocarditis cases, which reported a mortality rate of 42% for hVISA infections compared to 35% for non-hVISA infections (2). In our study, 63% of the hVISA-infected patients died within 30 days compared to 38% of the non-hVISA-infected patients. This finding suggests that other unique factors may be involved in USA600 BSIs. We found discordance in testing by MET and population analysis, which is consistent with a recent evaluation demonstrating that only 64% of isolates positive by MET were confirmed to be positive by population analysis (15). The optimal method to test for the hVISA phenotype is unclear, although population analysis is considered to be the “gold standard.”

The first reports of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) and 8 of 10 known cases of VRSA infection involved patients in the Detroit area. Recently, USA600 MRSA isolates with the hVISA phenotype were obtained from children in Detroit in a study in which 2 of 3 USA600 MRSA infections were caused by hVISA (1). Understanding the emergence of potentially novel strains in Detroit may have important implications for other geographic areas. In the present series of cases, USA600 isolates accounted for less than 5% of all BSI MRSA isolates. However, experience from Europe and Canada demonstrates that this strain has profound ability for widespread dissemination (16, 19, 20). USA600 is clonally related to the Berlin strain of MRSA (ST45), which spread throughout Germany (20), the Netherlands (19), and Ontario, Canada (16), over the last decade. Despite this, the prevalence of colonization with USA600 MRSA remains low in the United States (18), and reported infections with USA600 remain relatively infrequent. In order to fully understand the impact of USA600 MRSA both within and outside the Detroit area, these findings need confirmation in a larger comparative evaluation of BSI and possibly other types of infection.

Acknowledgments

Support for this study was provided by Henry Ford Hospital.

This study was consistent with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the institutional review board at Henry Ford Hospital (under IRB no. 5536), which provided a waiver of informed patient consent due to the nature of the study.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 24 March 2010.

The authors have paid a fee to allow immediate free access to this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Abdel-Haq, N., H. Al-Tatari, P. Chearskul, H. Salimnia, B. Asmar, M. Fairfax, and M. Amjad. 2009. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitalized children: correlation of molecular analysis with clinical presentation and antibiotic susceptibility testing (ABST) results. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 28:547-551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bae, I. G., J. J. Federspiel, J. M. Miro, C. W. Woods, L. Park, M. J. Rybak, T. H. Rude, S. Bradley, S. Bukovski, C. G. de la Maria, S. S. Kanj, T. M. Korman, F. Marco, D. R. Murdoch, P. Plesiat, M. Rodriguez-Creixems, P. Reinbott, L. Steed, P. Tattevin, M. F. Tripodi, K. L. Newton, G. R. Corey, and V. G. Fowler, Jr. 2009. Heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate susceptibility phenotype in bloodstream methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from an international cohort of patients with infective endocarditis: prevalence, genotype, and clinical significance. J. Infect. Dis. 200:1355-1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chua, T., C. Moore, M. Perri, S. Donabedian, W. Masch, D. Vager, S. Davis, K. Lulek, B. Zimnicki, and M. Zervos. 2008. Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream isolates in urban Detroit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2345-2352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.CLSI. 2007. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 17th informational supplement. CLSI, Wayne, PA.
  • 5.Donabedian, S. M., C. L. Moore, M. B. Perri, T. Chua, and M. J. Zervos. 2009. Do laboratory characteristics predict outcome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia? Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 15(s4):S540. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hiramatsu, K., N. Aritaka, H. Hanaki, S. Kawasaki, Y. Hosoda, S. Hori, Y. Fukuchi, and I. Kobayashi. 1997. Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350:1670-1673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Horan, T. C., and R. P. Gaynes. 2004. Surveillance of nosocomial infections, p. 1672-1689. In C. G. Mayhall (ed.), Hospital epidemiology and infection control, 3rd ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
  • 8.Howden, B., P. Ward, P. Charles, T. Korman, A. Fuller, P. du Cros, E. Grabsch, S. Roberts, J. Robson, K. Read, N. Bak, J. Hurley, P. Johnson, A. Morris, B. Mayall, and M. Grayson. 2004. Treatment outcomes for serious infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:521-528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8a.Klevens, R. M., M. A. Morrison, S. K. Fridkin, A. Reingold, S. Petit, K. Gershman, S. Ray, L. H. Harrison, R. Lynfield, G. Dumyati, J. M. Townes, A. S. Craig, G. Fosheim, L. K. McDougal, and F. C. Tenover. 2006. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and helthcare rick factors. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12:1991-1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klevens, R., M. Morrison, J. Nadle, S. Petit, K. Gershman, S. Ray, L. Harrison, R. Lynfield, G. Dumyati, J. Townes, A. Craig, E. Zell, G. Fosheim, L. McDougal, R. Carey, and S. Fridkin. 2007. Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in the United States. JAMA 298:1763-1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Knaus, W. A., E. A. Draper, D. P. Wagner, and J. E. Zimmerman. 1985. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit. Care Med. 13:818-829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lodise, T., P. McKinnon, L. Swiderski, and M. Rybak. 2003. Outcomes analysis of delayed antibiotic treatment for hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 36:1418-1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moise-Broder, P., G. Sakoulas, G. Eliopoulos, J. Schentag, A. Forrest, and R. J. Moellering. 2004. Accessory gene regulator group II polymorphism in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is predictive of failure of vancomycin therapy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 38:1700-1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Musta, A. C., K. Riederer, S. Shemes, P. Chase, J. Jose, L. B. Johnson, and R. Khatib. 2009. Vancomycin MIC plus heteroresistance and outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: trends over 11 years. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47:1640-1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.NCCLS. 1999. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline. NCCLS document M26-A. NCCLS, Wayne, PA.
  • 15.Sader, H. S., R. N. Jones, K. L. Rossi, and M. J. Rybak. 2009. Occurrence of vancomycin-tolerant and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate strains (hVISA) among Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infections in nine USA hospitals. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 64:1024-1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Simor, A. E., M. Ofner-Agostini, E. Bryce, A. McGeer, S. Paton, and M. R. Mulvey. 2002. Laboratory characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Canadian hospitals: results of 5 years of national surveillance, 1995-1999. J. Infect. Dis. 186:652-660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Soriano, A., F. Marco, J. A. Martínez, E. Pisos, M. Almela, V. P. Dimova, D. Alamo, M. Ortega, J. Lopez, and J. Mensa. 2008. Influence of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 46:193-200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tenover, F., S. McAllister, G. Fosheim, L. McDougal, R. Carey, B. Limbago, D. Lonsway, J. Patel, M. Kuehnert, and R. Gorwitz. 2008. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from nasal cultures collected from individuals in the United States in 2001 to 2004. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46:2837-2841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wannet, W., E. Spalburg, M. Heck, G. Pluister, R. Willems, and A. De Neeling. 2004. Widespread dissemination in The Netherlands of the epidemic Berlin methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone with low-level resistance to oxacillin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42:3077-3082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Witte, W., M. Kresken, C. Braulke, and C. Cuny. 1997. Increasing incidence and widespread dissemination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitals in central Europe, with special reference to German hospitals. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 3:414-422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Witte, W., G. Werner, and C. Cuny. 2001. Subtyping of MRSA isolates belonging to a widely disseminated clonal group by polymorphism of the dru sequences in mec-associated DNA. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 291:57-62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wootton, M., A. MacGowan, T. Walsh, and R. Howe. 2007. A multicenter study evaluating the current strategies for isolating Staphylococcus aureus strains with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:329-332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES