Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Phys. 2010 Jul;99(1):1–16. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181c910dd

RECONSTRUCTION OF RADIATION DOSES IN A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF THYROID CANCER FOLLOWING THE CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT

Vladimir Drozdovitch *, Valeri Khrouch , Evaldas Maceika , Irina Zvonova §, Oleg Vlasov **, Angelica Bratilova §, Yury Gavrilin , Guennadi Goulko ††, Masaharu Hoshi ‡‡, Ausrele Kesminiene §§, Sergey Shinkarev , Vanessa Tenet §§, Elisabeth Cardis ***,†††,‡‡‡, Andre Bouville *
PMCID: PMC2885044  NIHMSID: NIHMS172848  PMID: 20539120

Abstract

A population-based case-control study of thyroid cancer was carried out in contaminated regions of Belarus and Russia among persons who were exposed during childhood and adolescence to fallout from the Chernobyl accident. For each study subject, individual thyroid doses were reconstructed for the following pathways of exposure: (1) intake of 131I via inhalation and ingestion; (2) intake of short-lived radioiodines (132I, 133I, and 135I) and radiotelluriums (131mTe, 132Te) via inhalation and ingestion; (3) external dose from radionuclides deposited on the ground; and (4) ingestion of 134Cs and 137Cs. A series of intercomparison exercises validated the models used for reconstruction of average doses to populations of specific age groups as well as of individual doses. Median thyroid doses from all factors for study subjects were estimated to be 0.37 and 0.034 Gy in Belarus and Russia, respectively. The highest individual thyroid doses among the subjects were 10.2 Gy in Belarus and 5.3 Gy in Russia. Iodine-131 intake was the main pathway for thyroid exposure. Estimated doses from short-lived radioiodines and radiotelluriums ranged up to 0.53 Gy. Reconstructed individual thyroid doses from external exposure ranged up to 0.1 Gy, while those from internal exposure due to ingested cesium did not exceed 0.05 Gy. The uncertainty of the reconstructed individual thyroid doses, characterized by the geometric standard deviation, varies from 1.7 to 4.0 with a median of 2.2.

Keywords: Chernobyl, radioiodine, dose reconstruction, thyroid

INTRODUCTION

The accident, which occurred at the Chernobyl power plant in north-western Ukraine on 26 April 1986, resulted in widespread radioactive contamination of the territories of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. Following the accident, large amounts of radioactive materials were released to the atmosphere, including (1.2–1.8)×1018 Bq of 131I, (3.5–3.7)×1018 Bq of 132Te and 133I, and (1.3–1.4)×1017 Bq of long-lived 134Cs and 137Cs (UNSCEAR 2000). During the first month after the accident, the human thyroid gland was the main target of exposure resulting from the radioactive contamination of the environment. In Belarus, it is estimated that several thousand children received thyroid doses from 131I of 2 Gy or more (UNSCEAR 2000).

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) initiated a population-based case-control study of thyroid cancer among young people who resided in the areas of Belarus and Russia that were heavily contaminated by the Chernobyl accident. Overall, 1,615 subjects, cases and controls, all aged 0-18 at the time of the accident were included in this study. A description of clinical and epidemiological aspects of the study is given elsewhere (Cardis et al. 2005).

To estimate the risk of radiation-induced thyroid cancer, the radiation absorbed dose to the thyroid gland, which resulted mainly from intake of 131I, had to be evaluated for each subject in the study. In addition, three other contributions to the thyroid dose, which were quite small for the majority of individuals but relatively important for persons with no or little milk consumption, were estimated within the framework of the study: (1) Internal irradiation resulting from intake of short-lived radioiodines (132I, 133I, and 135I) and of short-lived radiotelluriums (131mTe and 132Te); (2) External irradiation resulting from the deposition of radionuclides on the ground; and (3) Internal irradiation resulting from intake of long-lived radionuclides such as 134Cs and 137Cs.

Thousands of radiation measurements were made in May-June 1986 on people living in contaminated areas of Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. These so-called “direct thyroid measurements” were obtained by placing a radiation detector against the neck. It was these exposure-rate measurements that were used as a basis to estimate 131I content in the thyroid gland and to reconstruct thyroid doses to the inhabitants of the settlements (Gavrilin et al. 1999a; Zvonova and Balonov 1993; Likhtarev et al. 1993). Direct thyroid measurements can be considered as the most reliable information for dose assessment purposes, despite associated uncertainties arising from errors in the estimation of the 131I thyroidal content and in the evaluation of the 131I intake function (Likhtarev et al. 2003). However, these measurements covered only a fraction of the population residing in contaminated regions of Belarus and Russia, and, therefore, only a fraction of the subjects enrolled in the case-control study. For the purposes of the epidemiological study, a single uniform method for dose reconstruction was required for all individuals included in the study.

This study considered four dosimetric models that were developed during the post-accident period to evaluate thyroid doses from 131I to the population of Belarus and Russia not covered by direct thyroid measurements (Gavrilin et al. 1999a; Zvonova et al. 1998; Drozdovitch et al. 1997; Vlasov and Pitkevich 1999). The dosimetry working group was set up to develop a common approach to be used to reconstruct individual thyroid doses from all exposure pathways for all study subjects. The development of the common approach included the following steps:

  1. Critical review of the four dosimetry models used for dose reconstruction in Belarus and Russia.

  2. Validation of four models through a first intercomparison exercise in which the four models were used to calculate average doses to populations of specific age groups from 20 settlements. The obtained results were then compared with average doses based on the direct thyroid measurements that were conducted in those settlements.

  3. Modification of the two selected models that gave the best prediction in first intercomparison exercise in order to reconstruct individual doses for 42 persons taking into account the information obtained during the personal interviews.

  4. Validation of the two selected models through a second intercomparison exercise in which the thyroid individual predicted doses were compared for a number of persons with individual doses calculated from direct thyroid measurements.

  5. Intercomparison of the results obtained by the two models and analysis of discrepancies observed in model predictions. Selection of the best model for thyroid dose reconstruction.

This paper presents the methods and results of the reconstruction of individual thyroid doses for the subjects of the case-control study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Age and geographical distribution of study subjects

The study included 1,218 persons from Belarus and 397 persons from Russia, both cases and controls, all aged 0-18 y at the time of the accident in 1986. A personal interview collected information on places of residence, consumption and origin of milk, milk products and leafy green vegetables, time spent outdoors, and countermeasures (evacuation, self-relocation, stable iodine administration) in the period following the accident (Cardis et al. 2005). The distribution of the study subjects according to age at the time of the accident is given in Table 1. More than half of the study subjects were less than 5 years old at the time of the accident.

Table 1.

Distribution of the study subjects according to age at the time of the accident.

Age, years Belarus
Russia
Total
Gomel Mogilev Bryansk Kaluga Orel Tula
<2 463 60 25 4 7 15 574
2-4 302 47 18 11 22 22 422
5-9 204 17 10 20 32 37 320
10-14 74 51 7 14 44 24 214
15-18 - - 4 1 55 25 85
Total 1,043 175 64 50 160 123 1,615

At the time of the Chernobyl accident study subjects resided in one of six heavily contaminated regions: Gomel and Mogilev oblasts in Belarus or Bryansk, Kaluga, Orel and Tula oblasts in Russia (Fig.1). The geographical distribution of the study subjects according to the oblast of residence at the time of the accident and range of mean 137Cs and 131I deposition in the settlements of residence is given in Table 2.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Oblasts of Belarus and Russia contaminated following the Chernobyl accident where the case-control study was conducted.

Table 2.

Distribution of the study subjects according to the oblast of residence at the time of the accident and range of 137Cs and 131I deposition in settlements of residence.

Country Oblast Number of subjects 137Cs deposition densitya (kBq m−2) Time-integrated 131I deposition density (MBq m−2)
Belarus Gomel 1,043 6 – 18,529 0.15 – 284
Mogilev 175 2 – 2,754 0.03 – 21.3
Russia Bryansk 64 4 – 3,500 0.06 – 23.6
Kaluga 50 3 – 178 0.02 – 1.11
Orel 160 3 – 209 0.04 – 1.33
Tula 123 3 – 468 0.05 – 2.96
a

According to Belarusian Hydrometeorological Committee (for Belarusian settlements) and Hydrometeorological Committee of Russia (for Russian settlements). Deposition density corrected to May 1986.

Reconstruction of thyroid doses from 131I

The consumption of locally produced milk was the most important pathway of thyroid exposure to 131I in the period immediately following the accident. Although leafy vegetables were not widely available in the territory of consideration at the time of deposition (early spring), their consumption was relatively important for subjects with low or no milk consumption. Internal thyroid exposure due to inhalation of 131I was also important for individuals evacuated shortly after the accident and for those who stopped consuming locally produced foodstuffs. Therefore, dose reconstruction included the following pathways of thyroid exposure from 131I: (1) Internal exposure due to inhalation of 131I; (2) Internal exposure from intake of milk and milk products contaminated with131I; and (3) Internal exposure from intake of leafy vegetables contaminated with 131I.

The dosimetry working group considered four different models for reconstruction of the average thyroid dose in a settlement. These models fall into two categories. The first category involves a semi-empirical approach (Gavrilin et al. 1999a; Zvonova et al. 1998), that is based on the relation between environmental contamination (137Cs or 131I deposition density, 131I concentration in milk) and thyroid dose estimated from direct thyroid measurements carried out in territories of Belarus and Russia with different contamination levels and in populations of all ages (infants, children, adolescents and adults). The second is a process-driven approach (Drozdovitch et al. 1997; Vlasov and Pitkevich 1999), which considers a multi-compartment process of 131I activity transfer to the human thyroid either from 131I deposition leading to contamination of milk and leafy vegetables or from 131I concentration in ground-level air in the case of inhalation. Parameters of those models were adapted to local radioecological conditions.

To reach consensus on a single “best” method to be used in the case-control study, it was agreed that a number of further steps were needed before selecting that method: (1) Evaluation of the availability of the input information necessary for the models; (2) Comparison of doses estimated with different methods for the same settlement and scenario, and comparison of associated uncertainties; and (3) Verification that the model could take into account the information obtained with the case-control study questionnaire.

Intercomparison study for average settlement thyroid dose from 131I

The dosimetry working group organized the intercomparison study to assess the adequacy of the four methods proposed. At the first stage thyroid doses from 131I were evaluated by calculating the average thyroid doses to populations of specific age groups for 12 settlements in Belarus and 8 in Russia. They were randomly selected from the list of settlements where a sufficient number of direct thyroid measurements were available. The calculated doses were then compared with average thyroid doses derived from direct thyroid measurements in these settlements. The comparison assumed the same lifestyle and dietary habits as used in the calculation of doses from direct thyroid measurements.

To estimate the average thyroid dose from 131I in a settlement, the following common input information for all four models was used: (1) 137Cs deposition density in the settlement; (2) time-integrated ratio of 131I-to-137Cs activity in deposition; (3) dates of the beginning and end of fallout in the settlement; (4) date when cows were first put out to pasture; (5) dates and types of countermeasures applied in the settlement; and (6) age dependent ICRP models that describe the kinetics of iodine, inhaled or ingested, in the human body (ICRP 1990, 1995).

Every model predicted mean thyroid doses from inhalation and ingestion and associated uncertainties for 1-, 5-, 10- and 15-year old children in the selected settlements. In order to blind the participants of the intercomparison exercise and to avoid bias in calculations, the identity of the settlements was not disclosed.

Fig. 2 compares average thyroid doses from 131I assessed by four models with doses derived from direct thyroid measurements in the 20 settlements for 1-year old children. The means of the ratios of average thyroid doses from 131I intake predicted by each model to those derived from thyroid measurements are 1.0±0.5 (one standard deviation), 1.1±1.1, 1.3±1.3 and 2.7±1.2 for models #1, #2, #3 and #4, respectively; the corresponding medians of ratios were 1.0, 0.8, 0.9 and 2.6. The intercomparison exercise showed that model #1 gave the best agreement with the “measured” doses, followed by model #2. Estimates of the ecological model #4 tended to systematically overestimate the thyroid doses in the low dose range. Model #3 is also an ecological model, but results of the estimates were normalized by introducing empirical correction coefficients previously derived from direct thyroid measurements. Nevertheless, all models were in satisfactory agreement with the “measured” doses within the range of uncertainties.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of the average thyroid dose estimates from 131I that were calculated by four models for 1-year old children in 20 settlements with the doses derived from direct measurements. The error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Intercomparison study for individual thyroid dose from 131I

Originally, the models calculate age-dependent average thyroid doses under the assumption of standard behaviour of the population, i.e., countermeasures like self-evacuation, interruption of milk consumption, iodine blockade were not taken into account. To use these models for estimating individual thyroid doses for subjects with individual behaviour, a number of modifications were made. Specifically, models had to take into account the information obtained from personal interview including consumption rates and origin of foodstuffs, behaviour, residence history, and administration of stable iodine.

The second intercomparison exercise validated the adequacy of the two best models for individual dose reconstruction. This was carried out by comparing predicted individual doses with doses calculated from direct thyroid measurements for a number of individuals for whom information on lifestyle and diet was obtained using the study questionnaire. Forty-two individuals aged 0-16 years were randomly selected for the exercise among children for whom direct thyroid measurements were available in four oblasts where the case-control study was conducted: Gomel and Mogilev oblasts in Belarus, and Bryansk and Kaluga oblasts in Russia. They were traced and interviewed using the dosimetry questionnaire, which was used in this case-control study. Information from the interview was provided for model dose calculations together with the input data for the settlements of residence (except the name of the settlement).

Fig.3 shows the comparison of the individual thyroid doses from 131I assessed by the two models with doses derived from direct thyroid activity measurements for the 42 individuals. The dispersion (Fig.3) of the ratios of individual thyroid doses estimated using the model and those based on direct thyroid measurements could be due to relatively large uncertainties associated with the model calculation and uncertainties of doses derived from measurements. However, it should be noted that there was no systematic difference between calculated and “measured” doses. The means of the ratios of individual thyroid doses from 131I intake predicted by the model to that from thyroid measurement were 1.6±1.6 and 1.7±1.9 while the medians of the ratios were 1.0 and 0.8 for models #1 and #2, respectively. Therefore, the intercomparison exercise showed that model #1 gave better agreement with the individual “measured” thyroid doses than did model #2.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Comparison of the individual thyroid dose estimates from 131I that were calculated by two models for 42 individuals with the doses derived from direct measurements. The error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

Test calculation of individual thyroid doses from 131I

The two models that gave the best predictions were then compared. Individual thyroid doses from 131I were calculated for the subjects included in the case-control study using data from the dosimetry questionnaires. The comparison of the individual thyroid dose estimated using models #1 and #2 for study subjects from Belarus and Russia is shown in Fig.4. As can be seen from Fig.4, the variability of the ratios of the two sets of dose estimates is within a range of one order of magnitude. Nevertheless, the thyroid doses reconstructed by both models are in reasonably good agreement within, in general, the range of uncertainties for the majority of individuals. The distribution of the ratios of the thyroid doses estimated by model #2 to that estimated by model #1 in the whole dose range is characterized by an arithmetic mean of 1.0±0.9 and a median of 0.8.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Comparison of the individual thyroid dose estimates from 131I calculated by two models for the subjects of the case-control study. The error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

As a result of the validation study, model #1 (Gavrilin et al. 1999a) was selected to estimate the individual thyroid doses from 131I intake for the subjects of the case-control study. A brief description of this semi-empirical model is given in the Appendix.

Reconstruction of thyroid doses from short-lived radioiodines (132I, 133I, 135I), and short-lived radiotelluriums (131mTe and 132Te)

A nuclear reactor produces a number of short-lived radioiodines with half-lives of the order of one hour to one day. Their behaviour in the environment and the human body is the same as 131I. Also, the radiotelluriums, which are the parents of the radioiodines, need to be taken into consideration. Among these, only five short-lived radioiodines and radiotelluriums (132I, 133I, 135I, 131mTe, and 132Te) could contribute substantially to the thyroid doses of population.

Pripyat-town located near the Chernobyl nuclear power plant was the only settlement where short-lived radionuclides were measured in vivo among the exposed population (Balonov et al. 2003). As exposure was due to inhalation only and occurred within 1.5 days after the reactor explosion and before evacuation, the contribution of short-lived radionuclides to the thyroid doses was expected to be highest in that population. According to the in vivo measurements, the mean contribution of 133I, 132I, and 132Te to total thyroid doses was 30% in residents evacuated from Pripyat who did not take potassium iodide to block radioiodine uptake by the thyroid gland during the first 1.5 days after the accident (Balonov et al. 2003). By analogy with Pripyat, a similar contribution of short-lived radionuclides to the total thyroid dose would be expected for people who were exposed via inhalation only and evacuated shortly after the accident from the 30-km zone around the Chernobyl nuclear power plant. The contribution of short-lived radionuclides to the thyroid dose for residents of Russian settlements is estimated to be small. Based on evidence from Belarusian settlements with similar radiation conditions, it was estimated to have amounted to 10% at most for people whose intake was only via inhalation (Gavrilin et al. 2004). Although the contribution of short-lived radioiodines and radiotelluriums to the total dose was small, it is very important to estimate it, because of the suspicion that the impact of the short-lived radionuclides on thyroid cancer induction could be greater than that from 131I (NCRP 1985).

The distance of the settlement of residence from the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant and the pattern of the radioactive clouds in the first day(s) after the accident were used for the evaluating the thyroid doses from short-lived radioiodines and radiotelluriums. To group the regions with similar kinetics of radioiodine fallout, Gavrilin et al. (2004) used measured 131I daily fallout (Makhonko et al. 1996), 137Cs ground deposition density, and information about precipitation. A classification of the territory of Russia by probable level of dose from short-lived radionuclides was based on the same approach.

For each exposure pathway (i.e. inhalation, milk and leafy vegetable consumption) the age-dependent and region specific ratios of internal thyroid dose due to intake of short-lived radionuclides to internal thyroid dose due to 131I intake were estimated. Table 3 gives those ratios for subjects who did not change their behaviour during the first two weeks after the accident. For the subjects who changed residence, diet, or took stable iodine shortly after the accident, information from personal interview was taken into account in thyroid dose reconstruction.

Table 3.

Range of ratios of internal thyroid dose estimates due to short-lived radionuclides to that due to 131I for different exposure pathways.

Ratio according to exposure pathwaya
Country Region Inhalation Private milk consumption Leafy vegetables consumption
Belarus 30-km zone 0.38–0.55 0.021–0.032 0.07–0.14
Southern part of Gomel oblast 0.19–0.27 0.009–0.014 0.04–0.07
Mogilev-Bryansk cesium spot 0.14–0.20 0.008–0.015 0.09–0.20
Gomel city 0.07–0.10 0.004–0.006 0.01–0.02
Mogilev-city 0.06–0.08 0.001–0.002 0.01–0.02
Rest of Gomel and of Mogilev oblast 0.06–0.08 0.002–0.003 0.01–0.03
Russia Mogilev-Bryansk cesium spot 0.06–0.09 0.010–0.019 0.08–0.19
Rest of Bryansk oblast and Kaluga, Orel, and Tula oblasts 0.05–0.08 0.001–0.002 0.01–0.02
a

Range reflects age-dependence of ratio. The lowest value corresponds to the adolescents, the highest value to infants.

Reconstruction of thyroid doses from long-lived sources of exposure: external exposure and ingestion of cesium

External exposure of the population after the Chernobyl accident resulted from the ground deposits of gamma-emitted radionuclides, such as 95Zr, 95Nb, 99Mo, 103Ru, 106Ru, 132Te, 131I, 132I, 133I, 134Cs, 136Cs, 137Cs, 140Ba, 140La, 141Ce, and 144Ce. The contribution to the external exposure due to submersion in the radioactive cloud during its passage was negligible. Internal exposure of the population from long-lived radionuclides was mainly due to the ingestion of foodstuffs contaminated with radiocesiums (134Cs and 137Cs).

The dosimetry working group considered two models developed in Belarus and Russia for the estimation of the average whole body dose from long-lived sources of exposure: external exposure and ingestion of 134Cs and 137Cs. Models for external dose reconstruction (Drozdovitch et al. 2002; Pitkevich et al. 1996) in both countries used similar approaches based on the integration of the time-dependent dose rate in air per unit deposition, taking into account the shielding properties of the residential environment and the behaviour of the person. Only the model parameter values are slightly different. Models considered to estimate ingestion doses were, however, different in their approaches. One was a semi-empirical approach (Minenko et al. 2006) based on the relation between environmental contamination (137Cs deposition density and 137Cs soil-to-milk transfer) and internal dose derived from direct whole body measurements of radiocesium body burden, carried out in regions of Belarus with different contamination levels and in populations of different ages. The second was a process-driven approach (Vlasov and Pitkevich 1999), which considered a multi-compartment process of cesium activity transfer from deposition to human diet.

Intercomparison study for whole body doses from long-lived sources of exposure

An intercomparison study was set-up to assess the adequacy of the two available models (model #5 and model #6). Two dosimetry teams received the input data (137Cs deposition density, radionuclide composition in deposition, dates of the fallout in the settlement, date when cows were first put on pasture, and soil-to-milk transfer of 137Cs) for 10 settlements (where the case-control study subjects resided) selected within each of the four study oblasts in Russia. Similar to the previous exercise, the identity of the settlements was not disclosed to the participants.

Average whole body doses from external exposure and radiocesium ingestion for adults were reconstructed using models for the first year and cumulatively for the 10 years after the Chernobyl accident. The calculated doses were compared with those reported in the Russian Catalogue of doses (Balonov et al 1999) – considered as the “gold” standard.

The agreement between the external doses calculated by each of the two methods and the “gold” standard was satisfactory. The distribution of the ratios of the model estimates and of the “gold” standard for external dose during the first year after the accident is characterized by an arithmetic mean of 1.0±0.1 and a median of 1.0 for both models. Predictions of external dose during the first 10 years after the accident were also very close for both models: a mean 1.1±0.1 and a median of 1.0 were estimated for this distribution of ratios.

However, for internal dose from ingestion of radiocesium, the difference between models and the “gold” standard was more marked. The means of the ratios of predicted internal dose during the first year after the accident to the “gold” standard were 1.7±1.3 for model #5 and 2.4±3.2 for model #6; the median of the ratio was 1.3 for both models. Similar differences were observed for the cumulative doses predicted over the first 10 years after the accident. The means of these ratios were 1.7±1.6 and 3.0±4.6, and the medians were 1.2 and 1.5 for the same models. In general, model #5 showed a better agreement with the “gold” standard than did model #6.

Estimation of individual thyroid doses from long-lived sources of exposure

In order to apply the dose reconstruction models to estimate individual thyroid doses from long-lived sources of exposure within the case-control study, a number of modifications were made to the models to allow estimation of individual doses to the thyroid instead of the whole body. In addition, modifications took into account the information on the consumption and origin of foodstuffs, behavior patterns and residential history obtained from the personal interview.

The individual thyroid doses from external exposure and 134,137Cs ingestion for the study subjects were calculated with the two models using data from the questionnaires. The comparison showed that thyroid doses reconstructed by both models are in good agreement for the majority of subjects. The distribution of the ratios of the thyroid doses estimated by model #6 to that estimated by model #5 is characterized by an arithmetic mean of 1.0±0.3 and a median of 1.0 for external exposure and characterized by an arithmetic mean of 1.4±1.7 and a median of 1.1 for internal exposure.

Following the results of the intercomparison exercise, the dosimetry working group selected model #5 (Drozdovitch et al. 2002; Minenko et al. 2006) for the reconstruction of individual thyroid doses from long-lived sources of exposure for the subjects of the case-control study.

Reconstruction of individual doses for subjects who were in Ukraine during the first two months following the accident

According to the definition of the study population, all subjects resided in Belarus or Russia at the time of the accident; however, after analysis of the residential history from study questionnaires it appeared that several study subjects spent some time in contaminated Ukrainian settlements during the first two months after the accident. Internal thyroid doses from 131I were also estimated for them based on the results of dose reconstruction carried out in Ukraine (Likhtarev et al. 1993). Although the thyroid dose reconstruction model used in Ukraine was not included in the intercomparison studies discussed above, the method was based on results of wide-scale direct thyroid measurements performed in Ukraine in May-June 1986, and the information provided in questionnaires was incorporated in the same way as in Belarus and Russia.

Uncertainties in thyroid doses

Although the process of dose reconstruction provides a point estimate of each subject's dose, it is obvious that there is uncertainty associated with these dose calculations. The uncertainty analysis was performed using a Monte-Carlo simulation method. According to this method, dose realizations were simulated for each person taking into account the distributions of the model parameters, the available radiation data, and the answers to the questionnaire. This procedure was repeated 10,000 times with changed parameter values; therefore, 10,000 values of thyroid dose were obtained for each subject.

To run the Monte Carlo simulations, the probability density functions for all uncertain model parameters were assigned. It is important to note that for a single dose realization, some of the model parameter values were considered to be common, “shared” by certain groups of subjects, implying that any error made on this parameter was shared by all subjects to whom it applies. For example, the date of the fallout in the settlement is uncertain, but the same simulated value was used for all individuals of the settlement, while calculating each estimate of dose. Therefore, besides setting up proper probability density functions for the parameters, the inter-individual correlations were defined in order to take into account shared errors.

Other uncertainties were considered to be independent among subjects, for example, information from personal interviews regarding milk consumption and residence history. It is important to note that different degrees of uncertainty were associated with those unshared errors depending on the reliability of the answers obtained during personal interviews, i.e. the interviewer's evaluation at the end of interview on how reliable were the subject's answers was taken into account.

Therefore, the following errors in reconstructed thyroid doses were considered in the uncertainty analysis: (1) shared and unshared errors associated with parameters of the dosimetry models; (2) unshared errors that are associated with the information from the personal interview when answers from the study subjects are available; and (3) unshared errors that are associated with missing data values from the personal interview or associated with answers that could be considered as unreliable. A detailed description of the uncertainty analysis can be found elsewhere (Drozdovitch et al. 2007).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Individual thyroid doses

Validated models were used to estimate individual thyroid doses for the 1,615 subjects of the case-control study. Reconstruction of doses was carried out blindly in regard to the case/control status of study subjects. For all study subjects, estimates of individual thyroid dose included:

  1. Internal exposure from intakes of 131I due to
    1. Inhalation of radionuclide during the passage of radioactive clouds resulting from the accident,
    2. Consumption of contaminated milk and milk products during the time period from the accident (26 April) until 20 June 1986 when 131I can be considered as decayed, and (c) Consumption of leafy vegetables during time period from 26 April until 20 June 1986;
  2. Internal exposure due to intake of short-lived radioiodines and radiotelluriums via inhalation and ingestion during the first day(s) after the accident;

  3. External exposure from radionuclides deposited on the ground during the time period from the accident until the date of diagnosis of the case and the same date for his/her controls within the same match; and

  4. Internal exposure resulting from the ingestion of 134Cs and 137Cs during the time period from the accident until the date of diagnosis of the case and the same date for his/her controls within the same match.

The assessment of individual thyroid doses took into account: (1) the knowledge of the whereabouts and dietary habits of the subjects, which was obtained by means of personal interviews and (2) information on radiation contamination available for each settlement where the subject resided during the post-accidental period.

Table 4 gives thyroid doses reconstructed for study subjects from different exposure pathways. A large difference in thyroid doses between Belarusian and Russian subjects was found. The median dose in Belarus was over 10 times higher than the median dose in Russia: 0.37 and 0.034 Gy, respectively. In Russia, 96% of the doses were below 0.37 Gy, a value that was the median estimated dose in Belarus. The highest reconstructed thyroid doses were about 10.2 Gy in the group of Belarusian subjects and 5.3 Gy in Russian subjects. Intake of 131I with milk was the main pathway for thyroid exposure. However, for some of the subjects from Belarus, intake of leafy vegetables resulted in up to 4.9 Gy to the thyroid gland. The estimated doses from short-lived iodine and tellurium isotopes ranged up to 0.53 Gy; the median dose in Belarus was almost 10 times higher than the median dose in Russia: 1.7 mGy and 0.14 mGy, respectively. The estimated individual thyroid doses from external exposure ranged up to 0.1 Gy, while those from internal exposure due to cesium ingestion did not exceed 0.05 Gy. Doses from long-lived sources of exposure in Belarus were twice those in Russia.

Table 4.

Thyroid dose estimates for the study subjects.

Pathway and radionuclides of exposure Thyroid dosea (Gy)
Belarus Russia Both countries
Inhalation of 131I 0.009 (0–0.17) 0.0017 (0.0002–0.028) 0.007 (0–0.17)
131I intake with milk 0.27 (0–7.6) 0.020 (0–5.2) 0.15 (0–7.6)
131I intake with leafy vegetables 0b (0 – 4.9) 0.002 (0–0.51) 0b (0–4.9)
Short-lived radionuclidesc 0.0017 (0–0.53) 0.00014 (9×10−6–0.026) 0.0012 (0–0.53)
External exposure 0.0024 (0.0001–0.098) 0.001 (2×10−5–0.031) 0.0022 (2×10−5–0.098)
134,137Cs ingestion 0.0012 (2×10−5–0.042) 0.0005 (1×10−5–0.012) 0.001 (1×10−5–0.042)
All exposure pathways 0.37 (0.001–10.2) 0.034 (0.0003–5.3) 0.21 (0.0003–10.2)
a

Median (range).

b

More than half of subjects reported that they did not consume leafy vegetables.

c

Short-lived radioiodines 132I, 133I, 135I, and short-lived radiotelluriums 131mTe, 132Te.

Table 5 shows the contribution of different exposure pathways to the total thyroid dose. As can be seen from Table 5, 131I intake with milk was the main pathway for thyroid exposure; the median contributions to total thyroid dose are 90% and 74% in Belarus and Russia, respectively. The lower contribution observed in Russia could be explained by lower milk consumption rates in Russia compared to Belarus (370 vs 470 mL d−1, respectively for median) and a higher consumption rate of leafy vegetables reported by study subjects in Russia than in Belarus (20 vs 0 g d−1, respectively for median). Different milk consumption rates are related to the fact that about 70% of Belarusian subjects were under 5 years at the time of the accident, therefore, milk and milk products were a dominant part of their diet. In comparison, only 30% of Russian subjects were less than 5 years at the time of the accident. In addition, animals were put out to pasture later in Russia. Among all study subjects, the median contributions to total thyroid dose from exposure sources other than 131I intake was estimated to be 0.5% for intake of short-lived radioiodine and tellurium isotopes, 1.1% for external exposure, and 0.5% for ingestion of cesium isotopes.

Table 5.

Contribution of different exposure pathways to the total thyroid dose.

Pathway and radionuclides of exposure Contributiona of exposure pathways to the total thyroid dose (%)
Belarus Russia Both countries
Inhalation of 131I 2.3 (0–89) 5.3 (0.2–87) 2.9 (0–89)
131I intake with milk 90 (0–99.9) 74 (0–99.2) 84 (0–99.9)
131I intake with leafy vegetables 0b (0–96) 4.8 (0–94) 0b (0–96)
Short-lived radionuclidesc 0.6 (0–18) 0.5 (0.06–7.3) 0.5 (0–18)
External exposure 0.8 (0.01–68) 2.7 (0.07–76) 1.1 (0.01–76)
134,137Cs ingestion 0.4 (0.02–32) 1.5 (0.08–19) 0.5 (0.02–32)
a

Median (range).

b

More than half of subjects reported that they did not consume leafy vegetables.

c

Short-lived radioiodines 132I, 133I, 135I, and short-lived radiotelluriums 131mTe, 132Te.

It should be noted that for a small fraction of the study subjects, the contribution of long-lived sources of exposure to the thyroid dose was found to be higher than 50%. Five subjects of this study were relocated from contaminated villages shortly after the accident and before the date of main deposition, and, therefore, these individuals received relatively small doses from 131I due to inhalation and/or consumption of locally produced foodstuffs. In addition, 14 study subjects indicated that they did not consume local foodstuffs and that they resided permanently in villages that were highly contaminated with radioactive materials as a result of fallout associated with precipitations, and, therefore they received relatively low doses from 131I inhalation. For these 19 individuals, long-lived sources of exposure during the years following the accident were the predominant components of the thyroid dose.

Table 6 compares thyroid doses in Belarus and Russia in terms of age at the time of the accident. The thyroid dose decreased with increasing age: the median doses were 0.38, 0.37, 0.13, 0.041 and 0.015 Gy, respectively in the <2, 2-4, 5-9, 10-14 and 15-18 year age groups. The dose to young children is higher than that to adolescents because (1) the thyroid mass in children is smaller, and even for the same 131I intake, a child's thyroid receives a higher radiation dose because the same amount of energy is deposited in a smaller thyroid mass; and (2) dairy products, as the main route of 131I intake, were reported to be consumed in higher quantities during childhood: the fractions of consumers of milk and milk products were found to be 70%, 91%, 85%, 84%, and 87% in the <2, 2-4, 5-9, 10-14 and 15-18 year age groups, respectively, while the daily consumptions were reported to be 500, 520, 470, 460, and 440 g in the same age groups.

Table 6.

Distribution of thyroid dose estimates of the study subjects according to their age at the time of the accident and country of residence.

Age at time of the accident Thyroid dosea (Gy)
Belarus Russia Both countries
<2 0.44 (0.001–8.4) 0.12 (0.003–5.3) 0.38 (0.001–8.4)
2-5 0.45 (0.002–6.3) 0.075 (0.005–3.5) 0.37 (0.002–6.3)
5-10 0.29 (0.002–10.2) 0.030 (0.0003–0.42) 0.13 (0.0003–10.2)
10-15 0.12 (0.001–3.0) 0.020 (0.001–0.13) 0.041 (0.001–3.0)
15-18 - 0.015 (0.001–0.31) 0.015 (0.001–0.31)
a

Median (range).

Table 7 shows gender-specific distributions of thyroid doses estimated for the study subjects of different ages. As can be seen from Table 7, at all ages (except age group 2-5 y in Russia) thyroid doses for boys were found to be higher than that for girls. It should be noted that there were no any gender-specific differences in parameters of dosimetry models used in this study; and, moreover, doses were calculated blindly to the study subject's gender. Higher doses among boys were due to the larger fraction of milk consumers and higher consumption of dairy products among boys then that among girls. In Belarus, fraction of milk consumers among boys and girls of all ages was 82% and 78%; daily consumption of milk and milk products among consumers was 560 g and 470 g for boys and girls, respectively. Although the same fractions of consumers of dairy products among boys and girls were found in Russia (87%), higher daily consumption was reported by boys in comparison with girls, 520 g and 430 g, respectively.

Table 7.

Distributions of median thyroid dose estimates between boys and girls at different ages and country of residence

Age at time of the accident Belarus
Russia
Males
Females
Males
Females
N Dose (Gy) N Dose (Gy) N Dose (Gy) N Dose (Gy)
<2 210 0.49 313 0.39 35 0.16 16 0.10
2-5 115 0.55 234 0.42 38 0.062 35 0.094
5-10 84 0.36 137 0.25 32 0.033 67 0.029
10-15 29 0.22 96 0.091 10 0.043 79 0.019
15-18 - - - - 30 0.019 55 0.014
All ages 438 0.46 780 0.32 145 0.045 252 0.03

Uncertainty of reconstructed thyroid doses

An uncertainty analysis was performed on the estimates of thyroid dose from 131I intake as this was the dominant pathway for thyroid exposure for the majority of study subjects. For each study subject, a set of 10,000 values of thyroid dose from 131I was calculated. Distributions of those 10,000 doses were found to be approximately lognormal. Distributions of the geometric standard deviation of the individual thyroid dose from 131I among persons included in the study are shown in Fig. 5. The geometric standard deviation of the thyroid dose varies from 1.7 to 4.0 with median values of 2.3 and 2.1 for Belarusian and Russian subjects, respectively.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Distributions of the geometric standard deviation (GSD) of the individual thyroid dose from 131I for the subjects of the case-control study.

Sources of error were ranked according to their contribution to the uncertainty of model prediction. For individuals with standard behavior (average diet, no evacuation, no iodine blockade) the model is most sensitive to the following parameters: thyroid dose coefficient (that is mainly due to variability in thyroid mass) for ingestion and coefficient B and Ccomb of the semi-empirical model for combined dry-wet fallout (eqn. (A.1) of Appendix).

Comparison of individual thyroid dose estimates with thyroid dose derived from direct measurements

There were 81 individuals (63 from Belarus and 18 from Russia) for whom direct measurements of 131I activities in the thyroid were performed in May or in the beginning of June 1986. “Measured” thyroid doses were recalculated for those subjects taking into account individual data obtained from the case-control study questionnaire. Fig. 6 compares individual thyroid doses from 131I assessed by the model with those derived from direct thyroid measurements.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Comparison of individual thyroid dose estimates from 131I for 81 study subjects calculated using the model with the doses derived from direct thyroid measurements. The error bars represent 95% confidence intervals.

A rather wide range of ratios between those two sets of doses can be seen in Fig. 6. This effect is due to the relatively large uncertainties of the model calculations caused by errors in the parameter values of the dosimetry models and by the low reliability of individual information obtained more than 10 years after the accident. The mean of ratios of thyroid dose estimated using the model to that estimated from direct thyroid measurements is 2.0±2.2 and the median of ratios is 1.2.

CONCLUSION

The design of the epidemiological study required that the same procedure for dose calculation be used for all cases and controls to avoid possible biases. Within this study a common dosimetry approach was developed and validated to reconstruct thyroid dose using the same input data for all persons included in the study for Belarus and Russia. A series of intercomparison exercises validated four models for reconstruction of thyroid doses from 131I intake and two models for reconstruction of doses from external exposure and ingestion of cesium isotopes. All tested models were in satisfactory agreement within the range of uncertainties with both, average to population of specific age group and individual “measured” doses. Following the results of the validation studies, the models that showed the best agreement were selected to estimate the individual thyroid doses for 1,615 subjects of the case-control study.

For each study subject, individual thyroid doses were reconstructed for the following pathways of exposure: (1) intake of 131I via inhalation and ingestion; (2) intake of short-lived radioiodines (132I, 133I, and 135I) and radiotelluriums (131mTe, 132Te) via inhalation and ingestion; (3) external dose from radionuclides deposited on the ground; and (4) ingestion of 134Cs and 137Cs. Results of this study show that internal exposure from intake of 131I was the main pathway for thyroid exposure for the majority of persons living in contaminated areas following the Chernobyl accident. In general, the fraction of the thyroid dose due to exposure from short-lived iodine and tellurium isotopes, external exposure, or radiocesium ingestion was about 1 % for each pathway. Similar results were obtained for the thyroid dose estimates for subjects of the case-control study of childhood thyroid cancer conducted in Belarus in 1992-1994 (Minenko et al. 2006). However, for individuals who did not consume locally produced foodstuffs, inhalation of 131I was estimated to be primary exposure pathway followed by external exposure. There is also a group of 19 study subjects who (1) were relocated from contaminated areas shortly after the accident before the date of main deposition, or (2) did not consume local foodstuffs shortly after the accident and resided permanently in villages that were highly contaminated with 137Cs due to wet deposition. For these individuals, who received relatively small doses from 131I intake, long-lived sources of exposure during the years following the accident were the predominant components of the thyroid dose.

For a number of individuals included in the study, direct measurements of 131I activities in the thyroid were available, and thyroid doses for them were reconstructed based on those measurements. A comparison of the “measured” and estimated thyroid doses from 131I showed a rather wide range of ratios between them across both low and high doses. The mean ratio of thyroid dose estimated using the model to that estimated from direct thyroid measurements was found to be 2.0±2.2 and the median ratio was found to be 1.2. This large dispersion of the ratios shows the relatively large uncertainties of the model calculations caused by errors in the parameters of the dosimetry models and reliability of individual information obtained more than 10 years after the accident.

A point estimate of dose was provided for each subject in the study. Also, for each subject of the study a set of 10,000 values of thyroid dose from 131I was generated by Monte Carlo simulations to estimate uncertainties of reconstructed doses. Shared and unshared errors associated with parameters of the dosimetry models as well as with the available and missed information from the personal interview were considered in the calculation of stochastic doses. The geometric standard deviation of the thyroid dose varies from 1.7 to 4.0 with a median of 2.2. These sets of equally possible dose estimates are used to average the likelihood of the radiation risk parameters from which risk estimates are derived with confidence intervals taking into account the errors in doses.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by contracts FI4C-CT96-0014 and ERBIC15-CT96-0308 from the European Union (Nuclear Fission Safety and INCO-Copernicus Programmes) and a contract from the Sasakawa Memorial Health Foundation (Chernobyl Sasakawa Health and Medical Cooperation Project). The authors are grateful to all of the study subjects who agreed to participate in the study. Special thanks are due to the staff that conducted the dosimetry interviews. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Prof. Mikhail Balonov (Institute of Radiation Hygiene, St Petersburg, Russia) to the development and testing of the dose reconstruction methods and for his fruitful discussion of the results; and to Ms Lesley Richardson (Montreal, Canada) for useful discussions about the presentation of results.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  1. Balonov MI, Golikov VY, Bruk GY, Shutov VN, Bazukin AB, Zvonova IZ, Travnikova IG, Zhesko TV, Vlasov AY, Gordeev AV. Mean effective cumulated in 1986-1995 whole body doses for inhabitants of settlements of Brynsk, Kaluga, Orel, Tula, Ryazan, and Lipetsk oblasts of Russian Federation radioactive contaminated following the accident on the Chernobyl NPP in 1986. Radiat Risk. 1999;(Special Issue) (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Balonov M, Kaidanovsky G, Zvonova I, Kovtun A, Bouville A, Luckyanov N, Voillequé P. Contribution of short-lived radioiodines to thyroid doses received by evacuees from the Chernobyl area estimated using early in vivo activity measurements. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2003;105:593–599. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cardis E, Kesminiene A, Ivanov V, Malakhova I, Shibata Y, Khrouch V, Drozdovitch V, Maceika E, Zvonova I, Vlasov O, Bouville A, Goulko G, Hoshi M, Abrosimov A, Anoshko J, Astakhova LN, Chekin S, Demidchik E, Galanti R, Ito M, Korobova E, Lushnikov E, Maksioutov M, Masyakin V, Nerovnia A, Parshin V, Parshkov E, Piliptsevich N, Pinchera A, Polyakov S, Shabeka N, Suonio E, Tenet V, Tsyb A, Yamashita S, Williams D. Risk of thyroid cancer after exposure to 131I in childhood. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005;97:724–732. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Drozdovitch VV, Goulko GM, Minenko VF, Paretzke HG, Voigt G, Kenigsberg YI. Thyroid dose reconstruction for the population of Belarus after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1997;36:17–23. doi: 10.1007/s004110050050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drozdovitch VV, Shevchuk VF, Mirkhaidarov AK. Uncertainty analysis of external doses used to assess radiological consequences of the NPPs accident, Minsk, Belarus, IPEP-70. 2002. (in Russian)
  6. Drozdovitch V, Maceika E, Khrouch V, Zvonova I, Vlasov O, Bouville A, Cardis E. Uncertainties in individual doses in a case-control study of thyroid cancer after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2007;127:540–543. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncm360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gavrilin YI, Khrouch VT, Shinkarev SM, Krysenko NA, Skryabin AM, Bouville A, Anspaugh L, Straume T. Chernobyl accident: reconstruction of thyroid dose for inhabitants of the Republic of Belarus. Health Phys. 1999a;76:105–119. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199902000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gavrilin YI, Khrouch VT, Shinkarev SM. Validation of semi-empirical models of the thyroid gland internal irradiation dose formation and selection of areas (x) at estimating thyroid doses for adults of rural regions. Bulletin of Public Information Centre on Atomic Energy. 1999b;11:33–41. 54. (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Gavrilin Y, Khrouch V, Shinkarev S, Drozdovitch V, Minenko V, Shemiakina E, Ulanovsky A, Bouville A, Anspaugh L, Luckyanov N. Individual thyroid dose estimation for a case-control study of Chernobyl-related thyroid cancer among children of Belarus - Part I: 131I, short-lived radioiodines (132I, 133I, 135I), and short-lived radiotelluriums (131mTe and 132Te). Health Phys. 2004;86:565–585. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200406000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ilyin LA, Arkhangelskaya GV, Likhtarev IA. Collection of rules and standards on radiation safety in atomic energy. Vol. 2. Ministry of Health; Moscow: 1989. Instruction to provide an iodine prophylaxis in the case of nuclear reactor accident (1967). pp. 105–108. (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Ilyin LA, Arkhangelskaya GV, Konstantinov YO, Likhtarev IA. Radioactive iodine in the problem of radiation safety. Atomizdat; Moscow: 1972. [Google Scholar]
  12. International Commission on Radiological Protection Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intakes of radionuclides: Part 1. Ingestion dose coefficients. Ann ICRP. 1990;20(2) ICRP Publication 56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. International Commission on Radiological Protection Age-dependent doses to members of the public from intake of radionuclides: Part 4: Inhalation dose coefficients. Ann ICRP. 1995;25(3/4) Publication 71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Likhtarev IA, Shandala NK, Goulko GM, Kairo IA. Exposure doses to thyroid of the Ukrainian population after the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys. 1993;64:594–599. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199306000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Likhtarev I, Minenko V, Khrouch V, Bouville A. Uncertainties in thyroid dose reconstruction after Chernobyl. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2003;105:601–608. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Makhonko KP, Kozlova EG, Volokitin AA. Dynamics of radioiodine accumulation on soil and reconstruction of doses from iodine exposure on the territory contaminated after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Risk. 1996;7:90–112. [Google Scholar]
  17. Matsunaga T, Kobayashi K. Sensitivity analysis on the effectiveness of iodine prophylaxis to reduce thyroid gland exposure in nuclear emergency. Proc. of IRPA-10. 2000:11–307. [Google Scholar]
  18. Minenko V, Ulanovsky A, Drozdovitch V, Shemiakina E, Gavrilin Y, Khrouch V, Shinkarev S, Bouville A, Anspaugh L, Voillequé P. Individual thyroid dose estimation for a case-control study of Chernobyl-related thyroid cancer among children of Belarus - Part II: Contribution from long-lived radionuclides and external radiation. Health Phys. 2006;90:312–327. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000183761.30158.c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. National Council on Radiation and Measurements . Induction of thyroid cancer by ionizing radiation. Bethesda, MD: 1985. NCRP Report No. 80. [Google Scholar]
  20. Pitkevich VA, Guba VV, Ivanov VK, Chekin SY, Tsyb AF, Vakulovsky SM, Shershakov VM, Makhonko KP, Golubenkov AV, Kosykh VS. Reconstruction of the composition of the Chernobyl radionuclide fallout and external radiation absorbed doses to the population in areas of Russia. Radiat Prot Dosim. 1996;64:69–92. [Google Scholar]
  21. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation . Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations; New York: 2000. 2000 Report; Sales No. E.00.IX.4. [Google Scholar]
  22. Vlasov OK, Pitkevich VA. Agro-climate model for estimation of radionuclides transport on food chain and for formation of internal exposure to population. Radiat Risk. 1999;11:65–85. (in Russian) [Google Scholar]
  23. Zvonova IA, Balonov MI. Radioiodine dosimetry and prediction of consequences of thyroid exposure of the Russian population following the Chernobyl accident. In: Mervin SE, Balonov MI, editors. The Chernobyl papers. Vol.1. Doses to the Soviet population and the early health effects studies. Research Enterprises, Inc.; Richland, WA: 1993. pp. 71–125. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zvonova IA, Balonov MI, Bratilova AA. Thyroid dose reconstruction for population of Russia suffered after the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Prot Dosim. 1998;79:175–178. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES