Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2010 May 3;11(5):2010–2016. doi: 10.3390/ijms11052010

Isolation and Characterization of Novel Microsatellite Markers in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.)

Seyed Mostafa Pirseyedi 1, Sahar Valizadehghan 1, Mohsen Mardi 1,*, Mohammad Reza Ghaffari 1, Parvaneh Mahmoodi 1, Mehdi Zahravi 2, Mehrshad Zeinalabedini 1, Seyed Mojtaba Khayam Nekoui 1
PMCID: PMC2885090  PMID: 20559498

Abstract

Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) has been cultivated from ancient times for its economic, ornamental and medicinal properties globally. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers from a repeat-enriched genomic library of Punica granatum L. The genetic diversity of these loci was assessed in 60 genotypes of Punica granatum L. All loci were variable: the number of polymorphic alleles per locus ranged from two to five (average 2.9). The observed and expected heterozygosities ranged from 0.15 to 0.87 and 0.29 to 0.65, respectively. The polymorphic information content ranged from 0.26 to 0.61 (average: 0.43). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that polymorphic microsatellite markers have been reported for P. granatum L. These new markers should allow studies of the population structure and genetic diversity of pomegranate to be performed in the future.

Keywords: Punica granatum, microsatellite, pomegranate, SSR

1. Introduction

The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) probably originated in Iran [1], and from there diversified to other regions such as the Mediterranean. Large areas of Iran within the boundaries of the two deserts that occupy the central Iranian plateau (Dasht-e-kavir and Kavir-e-Loot) have arid or semiarid conditions that make them suitable for pomegranate production. In fact, the pomegranate has been cultivated from ancient times for its economic, ornamental and medicinal properties in all of the provinces that border the central desert. In these provinces, the area under cultivation, rate of expansion, diversity of varietals, yield per tree, and quality of the product is all considerable. All of these factors support the fact that the pomegranate is endemic to Iran [2].

To understand the structure of the population, to prevent duplication, and assess the variation of this valuable species accurately, it is necessary to characterize each accession not only in terms of its morphological variation, but also by a genome-wide survey of genetic diversity. Although a wide range of morphological and physiological characteristics show variability in the pomegranate, only a few studies based on molecular markers have been performed to investigate the population dynamics of this economically important species [37]. Here, we report the isolation and characterization of the first polymorphic microsatellite markers for pomegranate.

2. Results and Discussion

Out of 80 clones sequenced, it was possible to design unique primers for 58 (72%). For the remaining clones, in some cases, the sequence quality was poor and in others, the SSRs were too close to the start or end of the insert. The polymorphism of the SSR markers was examined in 60 samples of P. granatum L. Twelve of the 58 markers were scorable and polymorphic. For these 12 markers, 35 alleles were identified (Table 1); the number of alleles ranged from two to five, with an average of 2.9 alleles per locus. The observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosities ranged from 0.15 to 0.87 and 0.29 to 0.65, respectively. The PIC values ranged from 0.26 to 0.61, with an average of 0.43. Out of 12 polymorphic loci, 10 were departed significantly from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) (P < 0.05).

Table 1.

Characterization of 12 polymorphic microsatellite loci in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.).

Locus Primer sequences (5′→3′) Repeat motif Expected product Length/observed range (bp) No. of alleles HO HE PIC Accession Number
ABRII-MP04 F:5-CAGGTGATTGACTACTTGG-3 (GT)7 201/195–215 2 0.82** 0.48 0.36
R:5-CAGATCTACAATAACATCAC-3 GU950619
ABRII-MP07 F:5-GATTAACAGCAAAGCCTAGAGG-3 (AT)9(GT)7 181/180–190 2 0.39 0.32 0.39
R:5-AGTAGCTGCAACAAGATAAGG-3 GU950620
ABRII-MP12 F:5-TTGAGTCCCGATCATATCTC-3 (CA)11 270/240–270 3 0.60** 0.42 0.34
R:5-TCAATCTGTCAGGAACAACA-3 GU950621
ABRII-MP26 F:5-TTTCTCGAAGAATTGGGTAA-3 (AG)25 166/145–160 5 0.37** 0.62 0.60
R:5-CTGAGTAAGCTGAGGCTGAT-3 GU950622
ABRII-MP28 F:5-ATCCTCTGTCTTTGTGTTCG-3 (GAGG)3(GA)19 349/350–390 3 0.15** 0.65 0.58
R:5-TGAGTAATTCCGGTCAGAAG-3 GU950623
ABRII-MP30 F:5-CCCAGTTTGTAGCAAGGTA-3 (TGAGC)3 175/160–190 3 0.85** 0.60 0.52
R:5-AAGCTGACATTCTTTGAAGC-3 GU950624
ABRII-MP33 F:5- TCTGTTTATTGCTGAAAGGG-3 (AG)12 105/80–120 2 0.65** 0.43 0.34
R:5-TCTTCTTCTTCTCCACCGTA-3 GU950625
ABRII-MP34 F:5-GGAAGAAGCAGAGCAATAGA-3 (GAA)3 210/180–220 3 0.75** 0.48 0.36
R:5-GTCCTGAGTAACCTGAGCTG GU950626
ABRII-MP39 F:5-AGTCTCTGAAGTTTGTCGGA-3 (GA)8(TTTTCT)2 252/250–305 2 0.30 0.29 0.26
R:5-CCTGAGTAAAGCATCTCACTG-3 GU950627
ABRII-MP42 F:5-GAGCAGAGCAATTCAATCTC-3 (GA)9 194/200–220 4 0.87** 0.61 0.54
R:5-AACAATTTCCCATGTTTGAC-3 GU950628
ABRII-MP46 F:5-AGTTGATCTGATGGACAAGG-3 (GTT)4 270/250–300 2 0.51** 0.38 0.31
R:5-CAGTACGGTGCTCAATACAA-3 GU950629

HO, observed heterozygosity;

HE, expected heterozygosity;

**

indicated deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (P < 0.01); PIC, polymorphic information content.

In this study, 12 polymorphic microsatellite markers for pomegranate were developed from an enriched partial genomic library that was constructed using the fast isolation by AFLP of sequences containing repeats (FIASCO) protocol. The efficiency of this method in this species was approximately 73%, which conformed to the expected percentage of efficiency reported [8]. In our sample, some markers deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. This result could be due to loss of genetic diversity in small random mating populations, small numbers of microsatellite markers, possible group structures and a mating system with a high level of inbreeding. A larger number of markers would still be required in future to enable wider genome coverage.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that polymorphic microsatellite markers have been reported for P. granatum L. Iran hosts a great genetic diversity of Punica granatum and more than 760 Iranian genotypes are collected at Iranian national pomegranate in Yazd, Iran. However, the study of genetic diversity, genetic background and mating behavior in Iranian pomegranate has been limited because of the lack of sufficient polymorphic microsatellite markers.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Isolation of SSR Markers

Genomic DNA was extracted from a pomegranate cultivar “Malas Yazd” using DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Germany). A genomic library enriched for di- and trinucleotides was constructed using the fast isolation by AFLP of sequences containing repeats (FIASCO) protocol [8,9] with some modifications. A total of 250 ng genomic DNA was digested with MseI (Fermentase) to give DNA fragments between 200 and 1000 bp in length. The fragments were ligated to adapters and then amplified in two stages by PCR using MseI primers to give numerous copies of each fragment. The genomic DNA fragments that contained SSRs were captured by hybridization to biotinylated probes that consisted of di- and trinucleotide repeats [(GC)17, (AC)17, (CT)17, (AT)17, (GT)17, (ATT)10, and (CTT)10], followed by binding to streptavidin-conjugated magnetic beads (BioMag®; Qiagen, Germany). Three non-stringent and three stringent washes were carried out with separation in a magnetic field. The recovered DNA fragments were amplified for 30 cycles using the MseI primers. The PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy (Promega, Germany), and transformed into Escherichia coli DH5a. Recombinant clones were identified by blue/white screening and restriction analysis (EcoRI; Fermentase, Germany). Eighty clones with inserts were purified using a plasmid extraction kit (Core-Bio, Canada) and sequenced (Macrogen Sequencing Service, Korea). Fifty eight of the clones contained microsatellite repeats and it was possible to design primers for them.

PCR amplification was performed on an ABI thermal cycler in a total volume of 15 μL, which included 20 ng DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.06 pmol each primer, and 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentase, Germany). The following reaction conditions were used: 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 10 touchdown cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 45 s at 60 °C (1 °C lower per cycle) and 40 s at 72 °C, and 25 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 50 °C and 40 s at 72 °C, with a final extension step of 7 min at 72 °C. Amplified products were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and visualized by silver staining. A 50-bp DNA ladder (Fermentase, Germany) was used to identify the alleles.

3.2. Data Analysis

The variability of these markers was analysed in 60 Punica granatum L. genotypes that were sampled from Iranian national pomegranate collection, Yazd, Iran (Table 2). POPGENE 32 [10] was used to calculate the observed and expected heterozygosities and to evaluate deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium between pairs of loci. All results were adjusted for multiple simultaneous comparisons using a sequential Bonferroni correction [11]. Polymorphic information content (PIC) was estimated using CERVUS v.2.0 [12].

Table 2.

Iranian pomegranate genotypes included in the study.

Genotypes Collection Label Origin
Torsh nar riz zirab R2-69-2 Mazandaran
Meikhosh marvast mehriz R3-67-23 Yazd
Shoor poost nazok saghand R1-71-5 Yazd
Panje aroos khafr torh R1-67-22 Fars
Ardestani malas darjzin R1-69-3 Semnan
Shirin dane sefid mehran R2-71-28 Ilam
Shahvar shirin R4-68-29 Yazd
Amene khatooni abrandabad malas R6-67-1 Yazd
Poost sefid paveh torsh R1-70-5 Kordestan
Torsh ashraf R2-70-30 Mazandaran
Shirin ardestan R4-70-14 Isfahan
Togh gardan R2-70-23 Yazd
Torsh poost nazok R4-70-24 Chahar mahal bakhtiari
Torsh poost sefid tarom R5-70-5 Zanjan
Tabestani save R5-70-16 Markazi
Vahshi tamini torsh R5-70-21 Sistan baloochestan
Jazi poost ghermez shirin R5-68-9 Kerman
Malas yazdi R1-67-14 Yazd
Shririn jazireh R2-69-3 Booshehr
Shirin poost nazok darjzin R2-69-4 Semnan
Siahdane shahvarkan malas R2-69-11 Tehran
Malas dane siah ramhormoz R2-69-13 Khoozestan
Vahshi jangali babolsar torsh R2-69-21 Mazandaran
Shirin poost sefid shahreza R2-69-30 Isfahan
Mesri torsh kazeroon R2-69-7 Fars
Garach shahvar yazdi R1-67-21 Yazd
Malas soorati dezfool R4-69-19 Khoozestan
Tolfdar dane ghermez malas R4-69-25 Khoozestan
Bitolf dane ghermez malas R4-69-29 Khoozestan
Vahshi jangali ghaemshar R5-69-2 Mazandaran
Sorkhpoost ize R5-69-3 Khoozestan
Narak pishva varamin R5-69-20 Tehran
Vahshi jangali roodsar R5-69-26 Tehran
Malas zoodras kan R4-69-10 Tehran
Zardanar poost nazok R5-67-2 Fars
Rash poost nazok R6-69-18 Kohkilooye
Zagh yazdi R1-67-3 Yazd
Malasie bidane malas R6-69-20 Semnan
Shiri ahmadi gogrgan R6-69-21 Mazandaran
Goli zirab savadkooh torsh R6-69-23 Mazandaran
Shirin taghlid kon R4-69-28 Tehran
Dombkooh sarjangal shirin R5-67-16 Kerman
Bihaste sangan shirin sistan R3-67-21 Sistan baloochestan
Meykhosh poostnazok R1-67-26 Kerman
Khajeatar mehriz malas R5-68-2 Yazd
Soghar naiin torsh R5-67-1 Isfahan
Malas soori paveh R5-70-15 Kermanshah
Vashik torsh R6-67-30 Sistan baloochestan
Vahshinarak torsh R1-67-13 Fars
Shoorporbar seidoon torsh R3-67-22 Fars
Poost sefid abrandabad R4-67-15 Yazd
Gol peivandi torsh R3-68-29 Yazd
Domboland tosh R5-69-15 Mazandaran
Aghamohseni shirin R2-69-24 Mazandaran
Ghors galooboland bafgh malas R5-70-4 Yazd
Ood poostghermez R6-67-29 Fars
Asali sarvestan shirin R5-67-9 Fars
Khafri jahrom shirin R3-67-19 Fars
Bazri shirin dastjerd R1-67-24 Isfahan

4. Conclusions

Pomegranate germplasm collections will be benefited by utilizing the isolated microsatellite markers. These markers can complement morphological and pomological traits analyses for accurate population genetics studies and assessing genetic variations. They are also expected to be useful for efficient genetic studies, e.g., linkage analysis, construction of molecular linkage maps and marker-assisted breeding on Punica granatum L. These polymorphic microsatellite markers would be useful tools for future collection strategies and management of pomegranate genetic resources.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII).

References

  • 1.Levin GM. Pomegranate (Punica granatum) plant genetic resources in Turkmenistan. Plant Gen. Resour. Newslett. 1994;97:31–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.FAO/WHO Coordinating committee for the near east: project document for a regional standard for Pomegranate 2009. available online: ftp://ftp.fao.org/codex/ccnea5/ne05_09e.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Durgac C, Özgen M, Simsek Ö, Kacar AY, Kıyga Y, Celebi S, Gündüz K, Serce S. Molecular and pomological diversity among pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars in Eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2008;7:1294–1301. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Elfalleh W, Sarrai N, Gasmi F, Marzougui N, Ferchichi A. A taxonomic analysis of seed storage protein in eight Tunisian pomegranate (Punica granatum) ecotypes. Trends Bioinform. 2008;1:1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jbir R, Hasnaoui N, Mars M, Marrakchi M, Trifi M. Characterization of Tunisian pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Sci. Horticult. 2008;115:231–237. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mars M, Marrakchi M. Diversity among pomegranate (Punica granatum) germplasm in Tunisia. Genet. Resour. Crop. 1999;46:461–467. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zamani Z, Sarkhosh A, Fatahi R, Ebadi A. Genetic relationships among pomegranate genotypes studied by fruit characteristics and RAPD markers. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2007;82:11–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: A review. Mol. Ecol. 2002;11:1–16. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xu YQ, Wang Y, Li ZZ, Bao ZX, Zhou JF, Huang HW. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Gastrodia elata. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 2008;6:316–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yeh FC, Boyle TJB. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg. J. Bot. 1997;129:157. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution: Int. J. Org. Evol. 1989;43:223–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Marshal TC, Slate J, Kruuk LEB, Pemberton JM. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 1998;7:639–655. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES