Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 12.
Published in final edited form as: Neurosci Lett. 2010 May 12;478(3):179–183. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.012

Cerebrospinal Fluid Secretory Ca2+-Dependent Phospholipase A2 Activity: A Biomarker of Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier Permeability

Sonia Chalbot a, Henrik Zetterberg b, Kaj Blennow b, Tormod Fladby c,d, Inge Grundke-Iqbal a, Khalid Iqbal a
PMCID: PMC2885518  NIHMSID: NIHMS206547  PMID: 20470866

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier, the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB) and other specialized brain barriers are increasingly recognized as a major obstacle to the treatment of most brain disorders. The impairment of these barriers has been implicated in neuropathology of several diseases, such as autism, ischemia, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer disease. This dual function of the blood-neural barriers points out the importance and need for the development of techniques that can evaluate the nature and level of their integrity. Here we report the discovery of CSF secretory Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2 (sPLA2) activity as a measure of BCB permeability. Lumbar CSF from BCB-impaired (n=26), multiple sclerosis (n=18) and healthy control (n=32) cases was analyzed using both a newly developed continuous fluorescence assay for CSF sPLA2 activity and CSF/Serum albumin ratio (QAlb), the most common and established method to evaluate BCB permeability. While both measurements showed no significant differences between multiple sclerosis and age-matched normal healthy cases, they were highly correlated. Though the CSF sPLA2 activity and QAlb had over 95 % agreement, the former was found to be more sensitive than the latter in measuring low levels of BCB impairment.

Keywords: Albumin, Blood-brain barrier, Blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, Cerebrospinal fluid, Phospholipase A2

Introduction

Barriers between the peripheral circulation and neural tissues are collectively referred to as blood-neural barriers (BNB) and include among others, the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCB). While the BBB is diffusely distributed throughout the brain capillaries, the BCB is found at the choroid plexus [5]. BBB and BCB both are involved in regulation of transport of substances into and out of the brain and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), respectively. This essential role makes their integrity, which is in part achieved by the well-known tight junctions, essential in order to maintain brain homeostasis [5].

A disruption of the tight junction architecture and dysregulation of transporters increase the permeability of the BNB and de facto contribute to the pathophysiology of many neurodevelopmental diseases (e.g., autism, schizophrenia, epilepsy), neurological lesions (e.g., stroke) and neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease). Paradoxically, the high level of integrity of these BNB provides obstacles for successful delivery of therapeutical neuro-pharmacologic drugs. This contradiction points out the importance of evaluating the BNB integrity in physiological as well as pathophysiological conditions. The secretory Ca2+-dependent phospholipases A2 (sPLA2) belong to the phospholipase A2 (PLA2) family and catalyze the hydrolysis of the sn-2 ester bond of glycerophospholipids, resulting in the production of free fatty acids (e.g. arachidonic acid, docosahexaenoic acid) and lysophospholipids, both of which are precursors for the synthesis of proinflammatory mediators such as eicosanoids [8]. While the contribution of sPLA2 isozymes to various aspects of inflammation and their expression in the central nervous system are well-documented [8,29], their involvement in BBB and/or BCB function has not been reported.

In the present study, using a newly developed continuous fluorescence assay for CSF sPLA2 as well as CSF/Serum albumin ratio (QAlb), the most common and established method to evaluate BCB permeability, we report: 1) the discovery of CSF sPLA2 as a sensitive new technique for the measurement of BCB permeability and 2) an apparent lack of BCB impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

Bis-BODIPY® FL C11-PC (1,2-bis-(4,4-difluoro-5,7-dimethyl-4-bora-3a,4a-diaza-s-indacene-3-undecanoyl)-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) was purchased from Invitrogen (Eugene, OR, USA). 1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) and other chemical products were from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA).

Study Participants

The study population was retrospectively collected lumbar CSFs and sera available for research purpose from healthy individuals, patients with MS and cases with BCB impairment. The clinical features of the subjects involved in this study are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. The healthy control group (n = 32) consisted of subjects that were actively recruited to serve as controls and for which no cognitive disturbance was observed. The MS group (n = 18) consisted of three patients with primary progressive MS and 15 patients with relapsing-remitting MS. No patient was under immunomodulatory treatment. Patients with BCB impairment (n = 26) were seen on the clinical suspicion of a neurological disorder but no structured follow-up regarding final diagnoses was available.

Table 1.

Characteristics of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and age-matched healthy controls a

Healthy

Control b

(n=24)
Multiple

Sclerosis

(n=18)
Statistical Analysis
Statistical value P
Demographic, clinical and biochemical features
  Gender (Male) 10 (42%) 2 (11%) NA 0.041
  Age (years) 46.1 ± 12.3 41.6 ± 8.9 z=−1.868 0.063
  Oligoclonal bands 0 (0%) 18 (100%) NA <0.0001
   QAlb 4.7 ± 2.2 4.5 ± 1.4 t(df=36)=0.096 0.924
  sPLA2 activity (ΔFI/min) 3.7 ± 1.0 3.8 ± 0.8 t(df=40)=0.607 0.548

Pearson Correlation between QAlb and sPLA2 activity
  Pearson coefficient 0.590 0.870
  P <0.005 <0.0001
  95% CI 0.212 – 0.814 0.670 – 0.953
a

Categorical data (gender and oligoclonal bands) are expressed as number of subject (%) and differences between MS and age-matched healthy control were assessed using Fisher’s test. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and differences between MS and age-matched healthy control group were assessed using Mann-Whitney’s test (age) or Student’s t-test after logarithmic transformation (QAlb and sPLA2 activity). Pearson’s correlation coefficient was assessed after a logarithmic transformation of both variables (QAlb and sPLA2 activity);

b

24 out of the 32 healthy controls were selected to match age of MS group.

NA, not applicable.

Table 2.

Characteristics of patients with or without BCB impairment a

BCB Normal b

(n=24)
BCB Impaired c

(n=24)
Statistical Analysis
Statistical Value P
Gender (Male) 11 (46%) 16 (67%) NA 0.244
Age (years) 57.6 ± 11.5 63.7 ± 17.5 z=−1.876 0.062
QAlb 5.0 ± 1.9 16.7 ± 6.6 t(df=46)=11.46 <0.0001
sPLA2 activity (ΔFI/min) 3.8 ± 0.8 6.7 ± 1.5 t(df=46)=9.261 <0.0001
a

Categorical data (gender) are expressed as number of subject (%) and differences between BCB normal and BCB impaired cases were assessed using Fisher’s test. Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± SD and differences between BCB normal and BCB impaired cases were assessed using Mann-Whitney’s test (age) or Student’s t-test after logarithmic transformation (QAlb and sPLA2 activity);

b

BCB Normal group was composed of healthy controls without BCB impairment and 24 out of the 32 healthy controls were selected to age-match with BCB Impaired group;

c

BCB Impaired group was composed of cases with QAlb>10.2 and for which no structured follow-up regarding final diagnoses was performed; Following a Grubbs' Test analysis, 2 outliers out of the 26 patients with BCB impaired were identified and were not considered in this analysis.

NA, not applicable.

The study was approved by the ethics committees of Eastern Norway and the University of Gothenburg and by the Institutional Review Board of the New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities. Informed consent was obtained from all participants in accordance with the provisions of the Helsinki Declaration.

CSF/Serum sampling and biochemical analyses

While venous puncture was performed to collect serum, CSF was obtained by lumbar puncture from the L3/L4 or L4/L5 intervertebral space and the first 12 mL of CSF were collected, centrifuged at 2000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and then aliquoted in 1 ml polypropylene tubes. All samples were sent in dry ice from Sahlgrenska University Hospital to New York State Institute for Basic Research, and were aliquoted once again to minimize freeze/thaw steps and finally kept at −80 °C until used.

Biochemical analyses were performed as described previously. In summary, QAlb determination and oligoclonal IgG-bands identification were used to evaluate the BCB integrity [31] and as an indicator in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, respectively. Quantitative determination of both parameters was performed by common approach as previously described [11]. Thus, while QAlb was calculated as CSF albumin (mg/L)/serum albumin (g/L), identification of CSF-enriched oligoclonal IgG-bands was based on a cutoff level of two or more IgG bands.

sPLA2 activity was measured using a newly developed continuous fluorescent assay [4]. In a 96-well microplate, 5 µL lumbar CSF was diluted in 90 µL sPLA2 assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 100 mM KCl; 5 mM CaCl2; 1 mM DTT). Then, 5 µL liposomes made from 0.4 mg/mL 100 % DOPC and labeled with 100 µM Bis-BODIPY® FL C11-PC were added to each well and the microplate was immediately placed in a temperature controlled (30 °C) cytofluor multi-well plate reader series 4000 (PerSeptive Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The fluorescence intensity was recorded over 90 min (91 cycles of 60 sec each) at 485 nm excitation and 530 nm emission. Finally, sPLA2 activity was evaluated using linear curve fitting with Graph Prism 3.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using Statgraphics Centurion XV (StatPoint, Herndon, VA, USA) and Graph Prism 3.0. A failure in the normal distribution of a variable was considered when values of Skewness and Kurtosis were outside of the range −2 to +2. If a variable was not normally distributed, a logarithmic transformation followed by a parametric test or a non-parametric test was performed. Frequency distributions were compared with Fisher’s test. Differences between two means were assessed with unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney’s test. Correlations were analyzed statistically using Pearson’s correlation test or Spearman’s rank correlation test. Bland-Altman curves [2] and Sotgia curves [28] were constructed for comparison between QAlb and sPLA2 activity assays. While Bland-Altman analysis allows to calculate limits of agreement and systematic errors, Sotgia approach allows to visualize graphically the difference in magnitude between two analytical methods. To minimize the unit difference and to perform both analyses, variables were normalized to the average of all values of the corresponding parameters and converted to percentage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to calculate sensitivity, specificity and cutoff values of considered biomarkers in selected groups. The optimal cutoff value was defined at the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity. The level of significance was defined as P < 0.05.

Results

Correlation of CSF sPLA2 activity to QAlb

Secretory PLA2s are known to be associated with systemic inflammatory, autoimmune or allergic diseases [22,32] and to play a key role in neuroinflammation [23]. Recently, we have shown that the CSF sPLA2 activity is significantly increased in Alzheimer disease, a well known neuroinflammatory disorder [4]. In order to assess the relevance of CSF sPLA2 activity measurement in an ongoing neuroinflammatory process, we investigated its level in MS, an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system characterized by destruction of myelin sheaths and axonal loss [27]. While no significant difference (t(df=40) = 0.607, P = 0.548) of sPLA2 activity between MS and age-matched healthy controls was found (Table 1), a significant and positive correlation between sPLA2 activity and QAlb in age-matched healthy control (r = 0.590; P < 0.005; 95% CI: 0.212–0.814) as well as in MS (r = 0.870; P < 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.670–0.953) cases was observed (Table 1). Moreover, neither a significant difference in QAlb between multiple sclerosis and age-matched healthy controls (Table 1), nor a significant correlation between age and sPLA2 activity or QAlb were observed (data not shown). These results suggest a strong correlation of the CSF sPLA2 activity with the degree of BCB function as measured by QAlb.

According to the upper reference limit for QAlb (6.8 for individuals under 45 years of age and 10.2 for individuals over 45 years of age [3]), only 2 out of the 42 cases (5 %) independent of their clinical diagnoses were found to have a BCB dysfunction. Even when these two cases are removed from data analysis, the positive correlation between CSF sPLA2 activity and QAlb remains in age-matched healthy controls (r = 0.464; P = 0.039; 95% CI: 0.027–0.752) and in MS (r = 0.859; P < 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.633–0.950) as well as in total population (r = 0.602; P < 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.341–0.777). Thus, independent of the clinical diagnoses and when no BCB impairment is observed, sPLA2 activity is strongly and positively correlated to QAlb.

CSF sPLA2 activity as a measure of blood-CSF barrier permeability

To determine if the positive correlation between sPLA2 activity and QAlb is also applicable in BCB impaired cases, we investigated this relation in a set of patients with and without BCB dysfunction (Table 2). As expected, significant differences in both sPLA2 activity and QAlb between BCB impaired and age-matched BCB normal groups were found (Table 2). While a significant and positive correlation between sPLA2 activity and QAlb in BCB impaired (r = 0.710; P = 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.429–0.865) and age-matched BCB normal (r = 0.516; P = 0.0099; 95% CI: 0.142–0.761) and groups as well as in the total (r = 0.877; P < 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.790–0.930) cases was observed (Fig. 1A), no significant correlation between sPLA2 activity or QAlb with age was noticed (data not shown). Thus, independent of the age and of the BCB condition, sPLA2 activity is strongly correlated to QAlb. These results suggest that like QAlb, sPLA2 activity measurement can evaluate BCB impairment.

Fig 1. Comparison of sPLA2 activity with QAlb in patients with normal or impaired BCB.

Fig 1

(A) Positive correlations between sPLA2 activity and QAlb (CSF/serum albumin ratio) in BCB Normal (r = 0.516; P = 0.0099; 95% CI: 0.142–0.761) and BCB Impaired (r = 0.710; P = 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.429–0.865) cases as well as in total population (r = 0.877; P < 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.790–0.930). Pearson’s correlation was assessed after a logarithmic transformation of both variables; (B) Bland-Altman analysis showing the agreement between QAlb and sPLA2 activity for the measurement of BCB impairment. The mean difference ± 2 SDs are represented by horizontal solid and dotted lines, respectively; (C) Sotgia plot showing the distribution distance of individual % QAlb or % sPLA2 activity from each other and around the line of best fit (average versus average); (D) ROC analysis of diagnostic properties of sPLA2 activity for the differentiation of impaired BCB from normal BCB. The optimal cutoff level was 5.146 ΔFi/min, resulting in a sensitivity of 91.67 % (95% CI: 73.00–98.97) and a specificity of 95.83 % (95% CI: 78.88–99.89), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9809 (95% CI: 0.95–1.01).

We evaluated the strength of this new method of measuring BCB impairment by assessing the agreement between the two measurements, i.e. QAlb and sPLA2 activity, using the Bland-Altman method [2] and the Sotgia method [28] which allow to calculate limits of agreement as well as systematic errors and to visualize graphically the difference in magnitude between two analytical methods, respectively. The Bland-Altman plot is shown in Figure 1B. The difference between % QAlb and % sPLA2 activity measurement was plotted against the % mean from both methods and for each sample measured. The systematic difference between the two assay methods as calculated by the Bland-Altman analysis was <0.001. The two methods agreed fairly well for QAlb values <24.9 and only 4.2 % of the patients had values that differed by >2 SD. Since agreement between two methods is generally acceptable if <5 % of values differ by >2 SD, we can consider that the two approaches are equivalent in evaluating BCB impairment. Moreover, the Sotgia analysis shows that the values from sPLA2 activity measurement are higher and lower than the values from QAlb at low and high levels of QAlb, respectively (Fig. 1C). To evaluate the discrimination power of sPLA2 activity measurement, we performed a ROC analysis (Fig. 1D). This analysis indicates that sPLA2 activity efficiently discriminates normal BCB from impaired BCB (AUC = 0.9809; 95% CI: 0.95–1.01). Furthermore with a cutoff value of 5.146 ΔFI/min, the sensitivity and specificity are 91.67 % (95% CI: 73.00–98.97) and 95.83 % (95% CI: 78.88–99.89), respectively. Thus, sPLA2 activity measurement in CSF provides a sensitive and simple new approach to evaluate the BCB integrity.

Discussion

In this study we have discovered that BCB function can be evaluated by measurement of CSF sPLA2 activity. From the QAlb and CSF sPLA2 activity analyses on individuals with and without BCB dysfunction, we have found that both approaches are equivalent in evaluating BCB impairment as shown by an agreement of over 95 % between the two methods. Moreover, using the Sotgia method [28] we observed that the measurement of sPLA2 activity in human CSF was a more sensitive technique than the determination of QAlb. Alterations of BNB architecture contribute to the pathophysiology of several brain disorders and their high level of integrity can be obstacles for successful delivery of potentially beneficial neuro-pharmaceutical agents. The discovery of CSF sPLA2 as a measure of BNB permeability described in the present study can help, among others to 1) identify BNB impairment in various neurological conditions; 2) increase the specificity of differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disorders; 3) monitor time-dependent response to therapies that target BNB disruption as well as disease progression and 4) identify potential therapeutic windows in order to increase drug efficacy.

To date, several techniques other than CSF sPLA2 activity measurement are available to assess blood-neural barriers permeability but their safety, specificity or sensitivity have been recently reconsidered. For instance, imaging approaches, in particular Gadolinium enhancement in T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, are considered as the most robust to assess specifically BBB impairment [10,20]. But, this MRI analysis requires 1) intravenous administration of Gadolinium (Gd), a contrast agent for which a possible toxic effect has been recently reported [30] and 2) highly specialized equipment and expertise, which make medical imaging less suitable for routine clinical labs compared to microplate assays of CSF sPLA2 activity. Since disruption in blood-neural barrier integrity allows protein leakage in both directions, the other strategies currently in use consist in blood and/or CSF evaluation of either a blood-specific protein or a brain-specific protein such as albumin and S100β, respectively. However, due to the lack of specificity to the brain attributed lately to S100β [13], only CSF/Serum albumin ratio (QAlb) remains extensively used and widely accepted to assess BCB and/or BBB function [3,9,31].

Although the CSF sPLA2 assay is advantageous over existing methods of measurement of BNB in its ease of use, the nature of BNB measured remains unknown. But, based on the strong correlation between QAlb and CSF sPLA2 activity, it seems that the latter mainly measures the assessment of BCB impairment instead of BBB. Indeed, even if it is sometimes assumed that an increase of albumin concentration in CSF is an estimation of a BBB permeability, it seems more accurate to associate such assessment to a BCB breakdown. The reason for such a conclusion is due to the fact that a QAlb increase more likely and directly reflects albumin release across the BCB than a transport from blood to brain across an impaired BBB followed by diffusion across the permeable barrier between brain and CSF. In this context we also considered the possibility that changes in CSF sPLA2 activity reflect mainly changes in brain metabolism rather than altered BCB function. It is conceivable that this increase in CSF sPLA2 activity is due to a transport from the brain interstitial fluid, which readily communicates (by relative unrestricted diffusion) with the CSF. But our results that showed a lack of increase in QAlb and CSF sPLA2 activity in MS patients indicated to the contrary.

MS is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system [27]. Studies from MS patients as well as from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a well-known animal model for multiple sclerosis [16,17], have shown a key role for both cytosolic Ca2+-dependent PLA2 [14,17,21] and sPLA2 [7,24] in the pathophysiology of this disorder. In contrast, in the present study, we found a lack of alteration in the activity of CSF sPLA2 in MS. Together, these data do not reflect conflicting outcomes but instead assume that CSF and brain sPLA2 isozyme(s) are structurally and functionally distinct.

Because most of the CSF emanates from the choroid plexus, and because the bulk flow of the secreted CSF through the ventriculo-subarachnoid spaces is an order of magnitude greater than that of the brain interstitial fluid [15], it is likely that increase of CSF sPLA2 activity reflects phenomena taking place at the BCB interface. Thus, a transchoroidal transport of sPLA2 from the blood after a BCB breakdown as it is for albumin can be considered. But we have recently shown that CSF sPLA2 is of central nervous system-origin [4]. Another possibility is an increase of sPLA2 synthesis/secretion from the choroidal epithelium which in turn is involved in the BCB breakdown process. Corroborating this hypothesis, Hampel H. et al. proposed that an altered BCB function in neurodegenerative disorders may result from immune mediated events initiated, for example by increased levels of circulating inflammatory mediators [12]. In return, these inflammatory cytokines can induce the secretory PLA2 expression [26] followed by an increase of arachidonic acid synthesis. Then, this polyunsaturated fatty acid may increase the blood-neural barrier permeability [1]. This postulate suggests different roles of CSF sPLA2 and QAlb in the BCB dysfunction pathway. While CSF sPLA2 seems to be involved early in the BCB impairment process, QAlb increase results from it. The fact that the values from sPLA2 activity measurement were higher and lower than the values from QAlb at low and high levels of QAlb, respectively, the Sotgia analysis of these data in the present study corroborated this assumption.

Our findings of no significant differences in QAlb or CSF sPLA2 activity in MS patients compared to age-matched controls, allow us to confirm an absence of BCB impairment in this chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Similar findings were reported using QAlb, previously [6,18]. Pohl D. et al. [25] reported a blood-CSF barrier dysfunction in less than 15 % of both early- and adult-onset MS, but it is important to note that such conclusion was based on QAlb cutoff values of only 5 and 7, respectively. Thus, the BNB dysfunction considered as a major hallmark of MS seems strictly limited to a BBB impairment as shown previously by MRI scans [10,19,20]. Interestingly, we found a BCB impairment both by QAlb and by CSF sPLA2 measurements in Alzheimer disease cases previously [4]. These findings, taken together with a lack of any detectable changes in QAlb and CSF sPLA2 activity in MS in the present study, indicate a different nature of the BNB in MS vs. Alzheimer disease, and further support that QAlb and CSF sPLA2 probably mainly measure BCB integrity.

In conclusion, the present study shows that the CSF secretory (extracellular) Ca2+-dependent PLA2 activity in humans measures the degree of BCB integrity with a higher sensitivity than QAlb. This finding, among others, may facilitate further studies on 1) understanding the cause of BCB impairment, 2) identifying neurologic disorders with any BCB dysfunction and 3) monitoring time-dependent response to therapies that target BCB disruption as well as disease progression.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Janet Murphy for secretarial assistance. This work was supported in part by the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental disabilities, the National Institutes of Health - National Institute on Aging [AG028538], and Alzheimer’s Association [IIRG-06-25836].

Footnotes

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Abbott NJ. Inflammatory mediators and modulation of blood-brain barrier permeability. Cell Mol.Neurobiol. 2000;20:131–147. doi: 10.1023/a:1007074420772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Blennow K, Fredman P, Wallin A, Gottfries CG, Karlsson I, Langstrom G, Skoog I, Svennerholm L, Wikkelso C. Protein analysis in cerebrospinal fluid. II. Reference values derived from healthy individuals 18–88 years of age. Eur.Neurol. 1993;33:129–133. doi: 10.1159/000116919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chalbot S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Fladby T, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K. Cerebrospinal fluid secretory Ca2+-dependent phospholipase A2 activity is increased in Alzheimer disease. Clin.Chem. 2009;55:2171–2179. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.130286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Choi YK, Kim KW. Blood-neural barrier: its diversity and coordinated cell-to-cell communication. BMB.Rep. 2008;41:345–352. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2008.41.5.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ciusani E, Frigerio S, Gelati M, Corsini E, Dufour A, Nespolo A, La ML, Milanese C, Massa G, Salmaggi A. Soluble Fas (Apo-1) levels in cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients. J.Neuroimmunol. 1998;82:5–12. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(97)00177-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cunningham TJ, Yao L, Oetinger M, Cort L, Blankenhorn EP, Greenstein JI. Secreted phospholipase A2 activity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J.Neuroinflammation. 2006;3:26. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-3-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Farooqui AA, Horrocks LA. Phospholipase A2-generated lipid mediators in the brain: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Neuroscientist. 2006;12:245–260. doi: 10.1177/1073858405285923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ganrot K, Laurell CB. Measurement of IgG and albumin content of cerebrospinal fluid, and its interpretation. Clin.Chem. 1974;20:571–573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Grossman RI, Gonzalez-Scarano F, Atlas SW, Galetta S, Silberberg DH. Multiple sclerosis: gadolinium enhancement in MR imaging. Radiology. 1986;161:721–725. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.3.3786722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haghighi S, Andersen O, Rosengren L, Bergstrom T, Wahlstrom J, Nilsson S. Incidence of CSF abnormalities in siblings of multiple sclerosis patients and unrelated controls. J.Neurol. 2000;247:616–622. doi: 10.1007/s004150070130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hampel H, Kotter HU, Moller HJ. Blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier dysfunction for high molecular weight proteins in Alzheimer disease and major depression: indication for disease subsets. Alzheimer Dis.Assoc.Disord. 1997;11:78–87. doi: 10.1097/00002093-199706000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Herrmann M, Johnsson P, Romner B. Molecular markers of brain damage: current state and future perspectives. Restor.Neurol.Neurosci. 2003;21:75–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Huterer SJ, Tourtellotte WW, Wherrett JR. Alterations in the activity of phospholipases A2 in postmortem white matter from patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurochem.Res. 1995;20:1335–1343. doi: 10.1007/BF00992509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Johanson CE, Duncan JA, Stopa EG, Baird A. Enhanced prospects for drug delivery and brain targeting by the choroid plexus-CSF route. Pharm.Res. 2005;22:1011–1037. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-6039-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kalyvas A, Baskakis C, Magrioti V, Constantinou-Kokotou V, Stephens D, Lopez-Vales R, Lu JQ, Yong VW, Dennis EA, Kokotos G, David S. Differing roles for members of the phospholipase A2 superfamily in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain. 2009;132:1221–1235. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kalyvas A, David S. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 plays a key role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis-like disease. Neuron. 2004;41:323–335. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00003-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kastenbauer S, Koedel U, Wick M, Kieseier BC, Hartung HP, Pfister HW. CSF and serum levels of soluble fractalkine (CX3CL1) in inflammatory diseases of the nervous system. J.Neuroimmunol. 2003;137:210–217. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(03)00085-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kermode AG, Thompson AJ, Tofts P, MacManus DG, Kendall BE, Kingsley DP, Moseley IF, Rudge P, McDonald WI. Breakdown of the blood-brain barrier precedes symptoms and other MRI signs of new lesions in multiple sclerosis. Pathogenetic and clinical implications. Brain. 1990;113(Pt 5):1477–1489. doi: 10.1093/brain/113.5.1477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kermode AG, Tofts PS, Thompson AJ, MacManus DG, Rudge P, Kendall BE, Kingsley DP, Moseley IF, du Boulay EP, McDonald WI. Heterogeneity of blood-brain barrier changes in multiple sclerosis: an MRI study with gadolinium-DTPA enhancement. Neurology. 1990;40:229–235. doi: 10.1212/wnl.40.2.229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marusic S, Leach MW, Pelker JW, Azoitei ML, Uozumi N, Cui J, Shen MW, DeClercq CM, Miyashiro JS, Carito BA, Thakker P, Simmons DL, Leonard JP, Shimizu T, Clark JD. Cytosolic phospholipase A2 alpha-deficient mice are resistant to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J.Exp.Med. 2005;202:841–851. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Meyer MC, Rastogi P, Beckett CS, McHowat J. Phospholipase A2 inhibitors as potential anti-inflammatory agents. Curr.Pharm.Des. 2005;11:1301–1312. doi: 10.2174/1381612053507521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moses GS, Jensen MD, Lue LF, Walker DG, Sun AY, Simonyi A, Sun GY. Secretory PLA2-IIA: a new inflammatory factor for Alzheimer's disease. J.Neuroinflammation. 2006;3:28. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-3-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pinto F, Brenner T, Dan P, Krimsky M, Yedgar S. Extracellular phospholipase A2 inhibitors suppress central nervous system inflammation. Glia. 2003;44:275–282. doi: 10.1002/glia.10296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pohl D, Rostasy K, Reiber H, Hanefeld F. CSF characteristics in early-onset multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2004;63:1966–1967. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000144352.67102.bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Samuelsson M, Fisher L, Iverfeldt K. beta-Amyloid and interleukin-1beta induce persistent NF-kappaB activation in rat primary glial cells. Int.J.Mol.Med. 2005;16:449–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sospedra M, Martin R. Immunology of multiple sclerosis. Annu.Rev.Immunol. 2005;23:683–747. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sotgia S, Zinellu A, Pinna GA, Deiana L, Carru C. A new general regression-based approach for method comparison studies. Clin.Chem.Lab Med. 2008;46:1046–1049. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2008.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sun GY, Xu J, Jensen MD, Simonyi A. Phospholipase A2 in the central nervous system: implications for neurodegenerative diseases. J.Lipid Res. 2004;45:205–213. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R300016-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thomsen HS. Is NSF only the tip of the "gadolinium toxicity" iceberg? J.Magn Reson.Imaging. 2008;28:284–286. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tibbling G, Link H, Ohman S. Principles of albumin and IgG analyses in neurological disorders. I. Establishment of reference values. Scand.J.Clin.Lab Invest. 1977;37:385–390. doi: 10.1080/00365517709091496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Triggiani M, Granata F, Giannattasio G, Marone G. Secretory phospholipases A2 in inflammatory and allergic diseases: not just enzymes. J.Allergy Clin.Immunol. 2005;116:1000–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES