Skip to main content
Microbiology logoLink to Microbiology
. 2008 Apr;154(Pt 4):1170–1177. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/014761-0

Molecular epidemiology of meningococcal disease in England and Wales 1975–1995, before the introduction of serogroup C conjugate vaccines

Joanne E Russell 1,2,, Rachel Urwin 1,3, Stephen J Gray 4, Andrew J Fox 4, Ian M Feavers 2, Martin C J Maiden 1
PMCID: PMC2885627  PMID: 18375809

Abstract

A comprehensive meningococcal vaccine is yet to be developed. In the absence of a vaccine that immunizes against the serogroup B capsular polysaccharide, this can only be achieved by targeting subcapsular antigens, and a number of outer-membrane proteins (OMPs) are under consideration as candidates. A major obstacle to the development of such a vaccine is the antigenic diversity of these OMPs, and obtaining population data that accurately identify and catalogue these variants is an important component of vaccine design. The recently proposed meningococcal molecular strain-typing scheme indexes the diversity of two OMPs, PorA and FetA, that are vaccine candidates, as well as the capsule and multilocus sequence type. This scheme was employed to survey 323 meningococci isolated from invasive disease in England and Wales from 1975 to 1995, before the introduction of meningococcal conjugated serogroup C polysaccharide vaccines in 1999. The eight-locus typing scheme provided high typeability (99.4 %) and discrimination (Simpson's diversity index 0.94–0.99). The data showed cycling of meningococcal genotypes and antigenic types in the absence of planned interventions. Notwithstanding high genetic and antigenic diversity, most of the isolates belonged to one of seven clonal complexes, with 11 predominant strain types. Combinations of PorA and FetA, chosen on the basis of their prevalence over time, generated vaccine recipes that included protein variants found in 80 % or more of the disease isolates for this time period. If adequate immune responses can be generated, these results suggest that control of meningococcal disease with relatively simple protein component vaccines may be possible.

INTRODUCTION

The lack of a comprehensive vaccine for protection against meningococcal disease has been highlighted by the development and introduction of conjugate polysaccharide vaccines against serogroups A, C, Y and W-135 (Jodar et al., 2002). Serogroup B, the predominant cause of meningococcal disease in many countries (Caugant, 1998), is not, therefore, covered by routine immunization and the development of a conjugate vaccine against this polysaccharide is hampered by low immunogeniticy and perceived safety issues (Stein et al., 2006). Both these problems are a consequence of the identity of this molecule with host polysaccharides (Finne et al., 1983). Various approaches that use subcapsular antigens, both proteins and polysaccharides, have been proposed to provide what are best described as serogroup B substitute meningococcal vaccines (Jodar et al., 2002).

Any meningococcal vaccine must accommodate the extensive genetic and antigenic diversity of this common inhabitant of the human nasopharynx (Stephens, 2007). Two contrasting approaches have been employed: the identification of conserved antigens; or the generation of specific vaccines against certain types. The former includes the identification of candidate antigens from genome sequence data, so-called reverse vaccinology (Pizza et al., 2000), while the latter is exemplified by the use of outer-membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines to disrupt outbreaks of serogroup B disease caused by a single meningococcal clone (Bjune et al., 1991; O'Hallahan et al., 2004; Sierra et al., 1991). In practice the identification of highly conserved antigens has proved difficult, probably because any surface component that is expressed at sufficient levels to be a vaccine target is naturally variable. There remains the possibility of either making specific vaccines that target particular meningococcal variants or producing multivalent formulations of antigens that achieve broad coverage (van den Dobbelsteen et al., 2007). Both these approaches require detailed information about the molecular epidemiology of the meningococcus (Perrett & Pollard, 2005).

Despite their high diversity, meningococcal populations are structured into lineages that are identified as clonal complexes (cc) by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (Maiden et al., 1998). Only a minority of these, the so-called hyperinvasive lineages, are regularly associated with human disease (Caugant, 2001; Maiden et al., 1998; Yazdankhah et al., 2004). The prevalence of these lineages varies geographically and temporally but each complex tends to be associated with a particular repertoire of surface antigens (Urwin et al., 2004). Three strain-specific vaccines, based on OMV preparations, have been developed and deployed in response to particular outbreaks of meningococcal disease (Oster et al., 2005; Perkins et al., 1998). A more general approach is to identify combinations of meningococcal surface protein variants that will protect against all or at least a high proportion of meningococcal disease; however, the success of such vaccines will depend on the stability of association of antigen variants with invasive meningococci over time (Sacchi et al., 2000).

In the present work, molecular typing, based on the nucleotide sequence determination of meningococcal genes (Elias et al., 2006; Jolley et al., 2007), was employed to identify the variants of two major surface proteins, PorA and FetA, in England and Wales over 20 years prior to the introduction of meningococcal serogroup C conjugate (MCC) vaccines (Miller et al., 2001). These proteins are both typing targets and components that have been present in a number of strain-specific meningococcal vaccines (Jodar et al., 2002). In addition, the clonal complex and hence the hyperinvasive lineage was determined by MLST (Maiden et al., 1998). The data produced a highly discriminatory typing scheme but, notwithstanding a very high diversity of strain types, a relatively simple vaccine based on combinations of PorA and FetA variants could potentially protect against a majority of meningococcal disease over this extended period of time.

METHODS

Bacterial isolates.

A total of 125 isolates had been stored from 1975, comprising all of the isolates submitted to the Health Protection Agency England (HPA, formerly Public Health Laboratory Service England and Wales, PHLS) central reference laboratory in 1975. Although they did not necessarily provide a representative sample of the disease at that time, this is one of the largest isolate collections, with accompanying documentation, for one country from that time. By 1985 the more systematic submission of isolates to the HPA (at that time PHLS, England and Wales) Meningococcal Reference Unit (MRU) was common and a subset of 100 representative isolates was chosen from these. For 1995, when the MRU received nearly all meningococci isolated from notified cases of invasive disease, a structured sample was generated by choosing every tenth isolate submitted for inclusion in the survey, up to a total of 100 isolates. This gave a total of 325 stored isolates included in the study, which were cultured on heated-blood agar plates overnight. A total of 323 of these isolate were cultivatable: two of the 1975 isolates failed to grow. The overnight growth was used to prepare DNA using an Isoquick extraction kit (Orca Research). Sequence type (ST) information was gained from the two non-viable isolates by extraction of DNA from the stored material.

MLST.

This was performed as described previously (Jolley et al., 2000). Briefly, the seven housekeeping loci used in the scheme were amplified by PCR and the amplicons purified by precipitation to remove unincorporated amplification primers and nucleotides. These were then used as templates for dideoxynucleotide sequence reactions using BigDye Terminators (ABI). The extension reactions were separated on an automated DNA analyser (ABI) and the sequences assembled with the Staden software package (Staden, 1996).

Antigen gene sequencing.

The nucleotide sequence determination of the regions of the porA gene that encode most of the antigenic variability of this protein, VR1 and VR2, was undertaken using previously published methods (Suker et al., 1994). The region of the FetA gene that encodes the principal variable region (VR) of this protein was similarly determined (Thompson et al., 2003). For both proteins the peptide sequences were deduced and assigned names using the published nomenclature schemes (Jolley et al., 2007; Russell et al., 2004; Thompson et al., 2003).

Data storage and analysis.

Data were stored on a customized isolate database available at http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/. The database automatically generated the strain types according to the recently proposed typing nomenclature (Jolley et al., 2007). This has the format serogroup : PorA type : FetA type : sequence type (clonal complex); for example B : P1.7-2,4 : F1-5 : ST-41 (cc41/44). Analysis was conducted with the PubMLST database tools (Jolley & Maiden, 2006; Jolley et al., 2004). The diversity index for strain types was calculated according to Simpson (1949) and modified for strain typing (Hunter & Gaston, 1988).

RESULTS

Diversity of strain types

Serogroup information was available for 313 (96 %) of the meningococci examined and complete molecular characterization for MLST, porA and fetA loci for 323 (99 %) isolates. The two incompletely characterized isolates were the non-viable isolates from the 1975 sample; these were excluded from further analysis. A total of 204 unique strain types were present among the 323 isolates, providing diversity indices of 0.94 for the 1975 isolates and 0.99 for the 1985 and 1995 isolate collections. With the exception of serogroup, of which only four were present in each collection, the isolate collection from 1975 was less diverse than those for 1985 and 1995 for each of the characteristics measured (Table 1). The complete dataset, including geographical distribution of isolates, is available at http://pubmlst.org/neisseria.

Table 1.

Diversity of meningococci isolated from invasive disease over 20 years in England and Wales

Number
1975 1985 1995
Isolates 125 100 100
Sequence typed 123 100 100
Strain types 67 70 79
Serogroups 4 4 4
PorA VR1 variants 15 18 13*
PorA VR2 variants 20 25 21
FetA VR variants 23 19 22
STs 48 55 52
Clonal complexes 13 18 11
Isolates not assigned to a complex 4 5 6

*Including one isolate with a stop codon in VR1.

Prevalence of serogroups and clonal complexes over time

Most isolates were serogroup B (71 % of isolates in 1975, 67 % of isolates in 1985, and 58 % of isolates in 1995), with serogroup C the next most prevalent, rising from 20 % of isolates in 1975 through 27 % of isolates in 1985, to 36 % of isolates in 1995. Serogroup A represented 10 % of the isolates in 1975 and 2 % in 1985: it was not present in the 1995 sample. Most serogroup W-135 isolates were present in 1975 (6.5 % of isolates) and most serogroup Y in 1985 (4 % of isolates).

Each serogroup was mainly associated with particular clonal complexes in a given year, but this changed over time (Table 2). There were differences in the clonal complexes present in each of the three years, and the disappearance of serogroup A disease from the UK over the duration of the survey was due to the disappearance of members of the ST-1 complex. Serogroup A is mostly found in members of the ST-1, ST-4 and ST-5 complexes, which rarely express capsules of other serogroups, and their disappearance from most industrialized countries over the period of the survey is yet to be satisfactorily explained (Achtman, 1997). In contrast, the serogroups expressed by other clonal complexes changed during this period. For example, the percentage of isolates that were serogroup C increased from 20 % to 36 % but whereas most of these isolates belonged to ST-344 complex in 1975, the ST-11 complex was the major cause of serogroup C disease in 1995; members in this clonal complex predominantly expressed serogroup W-135 in 1975. In 1975 most serogroup B meningococcal disease was caused by ST-8 isolates; this was succeeded by members of the ST-32 complex in 1985 and members of the ST-41/44 complex in 1995 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association of serogroups with predominant clonal complexes over time

Clonal complex Prevalence (%)
1975 1985 1995
A B C W-135 A B C W-135 A B C W-135
ST-1 complex 9.2 2
ST-8 complex 38 4 6 2 6
ST-11 complex 0.8 4.9 7 4 27
ST-32 complex 0.8 31 7
ST-41/44 complex 5.7 11 1 25 1
ST-334 complex 2.4 16 3 4
ST-269 complex 0.8 7 12

Prevalence of strain types over time

A total of 12 (5 %) of the strain types were observed five times or more in the isolate collection, accounting for 93 (30 %) of all isolates. Of the remaining strain types, 168 (82 %) were observed only once (48/125 in 1975, 51/100 in 1985, and 68/100 in 1995) and 15 (7 %) types were observed twice: two in 1975 and 1985 [B : P1.7,16-2 : F1-5 : ST-32 (cc32) and B : P1.7-2,13-1 : F3-9 : ST-8 (cc8)] and two in 1985 and 1995 [B : P1.19,15 : F5-1 : ST-34 (cc32) and C : P1.5,2 : F5-8 : ST-11 (cc11)]. Of the eight strain types observed three times (4 %), only one occurred in two years [B : P1.19-1,15-11 : F1-7 : ST-269 (cc269) in 1985 and 1995)] and both (1 %) of the types observed four times (2 %) were limited to one year. Together with isolates belonging to the same clonal complex, the most prevalent strain types accounted for between 76 % and 88 % of the disease isolates in any one year, although the prevalence of strain types varied with time (Table 3).

Table 3.

Prevalence of strain types represented more than five times and strain types belonging to the same clonal complex

Strain type Prevalence (%)
1975 1985 1995 Mean
ST-8 complex
B : P1.5-1,2-2 : F3-6 : ST-8 (cc8) 24 8.1
B : P1.19,15 : F3-9 : ST-8 (cc8) 3.3 1 1.4
23 other cc8 strain types 12 9 8 9.7
ST-41/44 complex
B : P1.7-2,4 : F1-5 : ST-41 (cc41/44) 3 6 3
40 other cc41/44 strain types 6.5 9 22 10
ST-11 complex
C : P1.5,2-1 : F5-5 : ST-11 (cc11) 6 2 2.7
C : P1.5,2 : F3-6 : ST-11 (cc11) 6 2
C : P1.5-1,10-4 : F3-6 : ST-11 (cc11) 6 2
21 other cc11 strain types 5.7 1 18 8.7
ST-32 complex
B : P1.19,15 : F5-1 : ST-33 (cc32) 6 1 2.3
B : P1.7,16-2 : F1-5 : ST-74 (cc32) 4 2 2
B : P1.7,16-2 : F1-5 : ST-343 (cc32) 5 1.7
15 other cc32 strain types 0.8 16 5 7.3
ST-1 complex
A : P1.5-2,10 : F5-1 : ST-1 (cc1) 4 1 2
5 other cc1 strain types 5.7 1 2.7
ST-334 complex
C : P1.5-1,2-2 : F1-5 : ST-334 (cc334) 3.3 1 1.7
23 other cc334 strain types 15.5 6 8.3
ST-269 complex
B : P1.19-1,15-11 : F5-1 : ST-269 (cc269) 3 1
13 other cc269 isolates 0.8 4 12 5.6
Total 82.1 76 88 82

Distribution of antigen variants

There were 131 unique combinations of PorA VR1, PorA VR2 and FetA VR, including three isolates that could not be characterized for PorA. Of the remaining 128 combinations, 85 occurred only once. Of the 43 combinations observed more than once, 30 were only seen in one year, ten in two years and three in all three years. The two most frequent combinations in the whole dataset were each observed in only one year: P1.5-1,2-2 : F3-6, which was present in 27 % of the 1975 isolates, and P1.7-2,4 : F1-5, which was present in 8.9 % of the 1995 isolates. The most prevalent PorA VR1 variant was 7-2, the most prevalent PorA VR2 variant was 2-2 and the most prevalent FetA VR was F1-5 (Table 4). The combined prevalence of the five most common variants was 68 % for PorA VR1, 48 % for PorA VR2, and 66 % for FetA VR. There were a limited number of combinations of the different VRs in the dataset with a tendency for non-overlapping structure (Gupta et al., 1996), although this was more marked with the two PorA VRs than with the PorA VRs and FetA VR (Fig. 1). The data permitted the design of a possible combination of PorA and FetA VRs for use in a vaccine, and the assessment of possible levels of coverage that such a vaccine might be able to attain, in the absence of immunological constraints (Fig. 2).

Table 4.

Most prevalent protein antigen variants

Rank order Protein variant (prevalence in all three years, %)
PorA VR1 PorA VR2 FetA VR
1 5-1 (23.4) 2-2 (15.2) F1-5 (23.8)
2 5 (13.1) 2 (11.1) F3-6 (15.6)
3 7-2 (12.4) 4 (8) F5-1 (11.7)
4 7 (9.6) 15 (7.6) F3-9 (9.8)
5 19 (9.6) 10 (6.4) F4-1 (4.8)
Combined prevalence 68.1 48.3 65.7

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Prevalence of PorA and FetA VR variants from 1975 to 1995. (a) The number of isolates with particular PorA VR1 and VR2 combinations. (b) The number of isolates with particular PorA VR2 and FetA VR combinations.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Potential coverage of a PorA/FetA combination vaccines in 1975 (▪), 1985 (•) and 1985 (▴).

DISCUSSION

Public health interventions against variable pathogenic bacteria require accurate, portable and reproducible typing schemes. This is especially important if, as with the meningococcus, the bacterium is not an obligate pathogen because the identification of invasive types can affect the nature of the intervention deployed (Maiden, 2002, 2004). MLST has provided a very reliable means of identifying hyperinvasive meningococci (Brehony et al., 2007), but does not necessarily provide sufficient discrimination for the unambiguous identification of disease clusters representing outbreaks (Bygraves et al., 1999; Feavers et al., 1999). The addition of PorA and FetA VRs added discrimination and identified antigen variants in this sample of invasive meningococci (Jolley et al., 2007) and such ‘fine typing’ has been employed in the identification of outbreak clusters in Germany (Elias et al., 2006).

The levels of discrimination achieved in the current survey were high (Simpson's diversity index 0.94–0.99), comparable with the result achieved with PorA and FetA typing previously, 0.96 (Elias et al., 2006). They were also similar to the best levels of coverage and precision achieved with other methods, indicating that the nine-gene sequence typing scheme has sufficient discrimination for the reliable detection of outbreaks (Swaminathan et al., 1996). In addition, the clonal complex information identified hyperinvasive lineages, enabling the monitoring of trends in meningococcal disease over time and comparison with other datasets (Brehony et al., 2007). Furthermore, as the procedure is PCR based it is inherently suitable for application to clinical specimens (Taha et al., 2005), and finally, the typing data were also informative as to the antigenic variability of the meningococcus.

The lower estimate of diversity index from the 1975 dataset was probably due to the limitations in geographical sampling of disease isolates at this time. Most of the isolates present in the collections for the two later years were independent. However, as the 1975 sample was the complete set of isolates available from submissions to the PHLS, it is possible that epidemiologically related isolates were present, which could also explain the high proportion of ST-8 isolates; indeed it is perhaps more likely that outbreak isolates would have been submitted to the PHLS reference facilities at this time. Geographical source of isolation was available for all of the 1975 and 1995 isolates and for 93 of the 1985 isolates. Of the 48 locations that submitted isolates in 1975, 12 submitted four or more with the greatest (Manchester) submitting 20. By contrast, in the 1985 dataset 55 locations were represented, only two of which (London, eight and Manchester, four) were represented more than three times. Similarly, in the 1995 dataset of 67 locations, only London and Manchester (five isolates each) were represented by more than three isolates.

The data were consistent with previous studies that have indicated dynamic behaviour in meningococcal populations (Caugant, 2001; Harrison et al., 2006; Yazdankhah et al., 2004). Disease incidence rises and falls with the presence of hyperinvasive lineages in the carried population of meningococci. The antigens associated with particular clonal complexes consequently rise and fall over time, as predicted by models of pathogen strain structuring by immunological selection (Gupta & Maiden, 2001), although there appeared to be differences in the stability of the lineages with regard to different antigens. The ST-1 clonal complex is very strongly associated with particular antigenic variants, including capsule and subcapsular antigens (Suker et al., 1994; Urwin et al., 2004), and serogroup A disease disappeared from the UK with this clonal complex. Despite reintroduction since then, for example with ST-5 complex meningococci in the 1990s, serogroup A meningococci have not, to date, re-established themselves as a cause of disease in the UK (Jones & Sutcliffe, 1990). The sialic-acid-based capsules, corresponding to serogroups B, C, Y and W-135, have a more dynamic relationship with clonal complex. This may reflect the fact that horizontal gene exchange of only the gene occupying the siaD locus of the capsular region is required to alter the serogroup (Swartley et al., 1997; Vogel et al., 2000). A further difference is that the serogroup A capsule is thought to be more immunogenic (Gold et al., 1979).

The clonal complexes associated with capsules containing sialic acid (the ST-8, ST-32, ST-344 and ST-41/44 complexes) are, however, more limited in the repertoire of subcapsular antigens that they express, each being associated with particular variant families. In particular, there was a tendency of the VRs to occur in non-overlapping combinations (Fig. 1), which, along with the dynamic behaviour noted above, is consistent with models of strain structuring based on herd immunity (Gupta & Maiden, 2001; Gupta et al., 1996). This also confirmed the observations made on a global dataset, where it was suggested that combinations of PorA VRs and FetA VRs might be an effective means of controlling meningococcal disease (Urwin et al., 2004). Simple vaccines based on combinations of these two components could achieve high coverage of circulating meningococci (Fig. 2). The implementation of such a vaccine may require epidemiological monitoring to ensure that it remains effective (Trotter et al., 2007).

Current approaches in the development of a comprehensive meningococcal vaccine can be divided into two distinct strategies: those seeking to enhance the immune response to conserved antigens and those based on highly immunogenic yet variable antigens. While not excluding the utility of vaccines based on conserved antigens, the observations reported here support the development of multivalent formulations consisting of variable antigens. The evidence of strain structuring indicates that such antigens are the principal targets of natural immunity. This is also consistent with clinical studies of OMV vaccines, which have repeatedly highlighted the importance of PorA for vaccine-induced immunity. In terms of clinical development, the most advanced multivalent vaccines consist of OMVs produced from genetically modified strains expressing multiple variants of PorA (van den Dobbelsteen et al., 2007). The present study provides a rational approach for deciding which variants should be included in this type of vaccine. It further suggests that ensuring the expression of appropriate variants of a second antigen, such as FetA, would be an effective way of broadening vaccine coverage.

In conclusion, meningococci isolated from cases of invasive disease are highly diverse at both housekeeping protein and antigen encoding loci; however, much of this diversity is transient, especially the minor variants of protein antigens. A more limited repertoire of antigen variants is persistent over time and these tend to be associated with particular invasive lineages. Combinations of subcapsular antigens reappear over time, sometimes associated with different lineages, perhaps in response to increases and decreases of herd immunity against particular strain types. This leads to the possibility that appropriately composed component vaccines may be able to protect human populations from meningococcal disease over periods of time sufficient to warrant their development and implementation.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Meningitis Research Foundation. M. C. J. M. is a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellow in Basic Biological Sciences. We thank the support staff of the former PHLS England and Wales for access to the isolates and associated information. This publication made use of the Neisseria Multi Locus Sequence Typing website (http://pubmlst.org/neisseria/) developed by Keith Jolley and Man-Suen Chan and sited at the University of Oxford (Jolley et al. 2004). The development of this site has been funded by the Wellcome Trust and European Union.

Abbreviations

  • MLST, multilocus sequence typing

  • OMV, outer-membrane vesicle

  • PHLS, Public Health Laboratory Service

  • ST, sequence type

  • VR, variable region

References

  1. Achtman, M. (1997). Microevolution and epidemic spread of serogroup A Neisseria meningitidis – a review. Gene 192, 135–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bjune, G., Høiby, E. A., Grønnesby, J. K., Arnesen, O., Fredriksen, J. H., Halstensen, A., Holten, E., Lindbak, A. K., Nøkleby, H. & other authors (1991). Effect of outer membrane vesicle vaccine against group B meningococcal disease in Norway. Lancet 338, 1093–1096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brehony, C., Jolley, K. A. & Maiden, M. C. (2007). Multilocus sequence typing for global surveillance of meningococcal disease. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31, 15–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bygraves, J. A., Urwin, R., Fox, A. J., Gray, S. J., Russell, J. E., Feavers, I. M. & Maiden, M. C. J. (1999). Population genetic and evolutionary approaches to the analysis of Neisseria meningitidis isolates belonging to the ET-5 complex. J Bacteriol 181, 5551–5556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Caugant, D. A. (1998). Population genetics and molecular epidemiology of Neisseria meningitidis. APMIS 106, 505–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caugant, D. A. (2001). Global trends in meningococcal disease. In Meningococcal Disease: Methods and Protocols, pp. 273–294. Edited by A. J. Pollard & M. C. J. Maiden. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. [DOI] [PubMed]
  7. Elias, J., Harmsen, D., Claus, H., Hellenbrand, W., Frosch, M. & Vogel, U. (2006). Spatiotemporal analysis of invasive meningococcal disease, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis 12, 1689–1695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Feavers, I. M., Gray, S. J., Urwin, R., Russell, J. E., Bygraves, J. A., Kaczmarski, E. B. & Maiden, M. C. J. (1999). Multilocus sequence typing and antigen gene sequencing in the investigation of a meningococcal disease outbreak. J Clin Microbiol 37, 3883–3887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Finne, J., Leinonen, M. & Makela, P. H. (1983). Antigenic similarities between brain components and bacteria causing meningitis. Implications for vaccine development and pathogenesis. Lancet 2, 355–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gold, R., Lepow, M. L., Goldschneider, I., Draper, T. F. & Gotshlich, E. C. (1979). Kinetics of antibody production to group A and group C meningococcal polysaccharide vaccines administered during the first six years of life: prospects for routine immunization of infants and children. J Infect Dis 140, 690–697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gupta, S. & Maiden, M. C. J. (2001). Exploring the evolution of diversity in pathogen populations. Trends Microbiol 9, 181–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gupta, S., Maiden, M. C. J., Feavers, I. M., Nee, S., May, R. M. & Anderson, R. M. (1996). The maintenance of strain structure in populations of recombining infectious agents. Nat Med 2, 437–442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Harrison, L. H., Jolley, K. A., Shutt, K. A., Marsh, J. W., O'Leary, M., Sanza, L. T. & Maiden, M. C. (2006). Antigenic shift and increased incidence of meningococcal disease. J Infect Dis 193, 1266–1274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hunter, P. R. & Gaston, M. A. (1988). Numerical index of discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson's index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol 26, 2465–2466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jodar, L., Feavers, I. M., Salisbury, D. & Granoff, D. M. (2002). Development of vaccines against meningococcal disease. Lancet 359, 1499–1508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jolley, K. A. & Maiden, M. C. (2006). AgdbNet – antigen sequence database software for bacterial typing. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jolley, K. A., Kalmusova, J., Feil, E. J., Gupta, S., Musilek, M., Kriz, P. & Maiden, M. C. (2000). Carried meningococci in the Czech Republic: a diverse recombining population. J Clin Microbiol 38, 4492–4498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Jolley, K. A., Chan, M. S. & Maiden, M. C. (2004). mlstdbNet – distributed multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) databases. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Jolley, K. A., Brehony, C. & Maiden, M. C. (2007). Molecular typing of meningococci: recommendations for target choice and nomenclature. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31, 89–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones, D. M. & Sutcliffe, E. M. (1990). Group A meningococcal disease in England associated with the Haj. J Infect 21, 21–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Maiden, M. C. (2002). Population structure of Neisseria meningitidis. In Emerging Strategies in the Fight Against Meningitis: Molecular and Cellular Aspects, pp. 151–170. Edited by C. Ferreirós, M. T. Criado & J. Vázquez. Wymondham, Norfolk: Horizon Scientific Press.
  22. Maiden, M. C. (2004). Dynamics of bacterial carriage and disease: lessons from the meningococcus. Adv Exp Med Biol 549, 23–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maiden, M. C. J., Bygraves, J. A., Feil, E., Morelli, G., Russell, J. E., Urwin, R., Zhang, Q., Zhou, J., Zurth, K. & other authors (1998). Multilocus sequence typing: a portable approach to the identification of clones within populations of pathogenic microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95, 3140–3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Miller, E., Salisbury, D. & Ramsay, M. (2001). Planning, registration, and implementation of an immunisation campaign against meningococcal serogroup C disease in the UK: a success story. Vaccine 20 (Suppl. 1), S58–S67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. O'Hallahan, J., Lennon, D. & Oster, P. (2004). The strategy to control New Zealand's epidemic of group B meningococcal disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23, S293–S298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Oster, P., Lennon, D., O'Hallahan, J., Mulholland, K., Reid, S. & Martin, D. (2005). MeNZB: a safe and highly immunogenic tailor-made vaccine against the New Zealand Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B disease epidemic strain. Vaccine 23, 2191–2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Perkins, B. A., Jonsdottir, K., Briem, H., Griffiths, E., Plikaytis, B. D., Hoiby, E. A., Rosenqvist, E., Holst, J., Nokleby, H. & other authors (1998). Immunogenicity of two efficacious outer membrane protein-based serogroup B meningococcal vaccines among young adults in Iceland. J Infect Dis 177, 683–691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Perrett, K. P. & Pollard, A. J. (2005). Towards an improved serogroup B Neisseria meningitidis vaccine. Expert Opin Biol Ther 5, 1611–1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pizza, M., Scarlato, V., Masignani, V., Giuliani, M. M., Arico, B., Comanducci, M., Jennings, G. T., Baldi, L., Bartolini, E. & other authors (2000). Identification of vaccine candidates against serogroup B meningococcus by whole-genome sequencing. Science 287, 1816–1820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Russell, J. E., Jolley, K. A., Feavers, I. M., Maiden, M. C. & Suker, J. S. (2004). PorA variable regions of Neisseria meningitidis. Emerg Infect Dis 10, 674–678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sacchi, C. T., Whitney, A. M., Popovic, T., Beall, D. S., Reeves, M. W., Plikaytis, B. D., Rosenstein, N. E., Perkins, B. A., Tondella, M. L. & other authors (2000). Diversity and prevalence of PorA types in Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B in the United States, 1992–1998. J Infect Dis 182, 1169–1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sierra, G. V. G., Campa, H. C., Varcacel, N. M., Garcia, I. L., Izquierdo, P. L., Sotolongo, P. F., Casanueva, G. V., Rico, C. O., Rodriguez, C. R. & other authors (1991). Vaccine against group B Neisseria meningitidis: protection trial and mass vaccination results in Cuba. NIPH Ann 14, 195–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Simpson, E. H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 [Google Scholar]
  34. Staden, R. (1996). The Staden sequence analysis package. Mol Biotechnol 5, 233–241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stein, D. M., Robbins, J., Miller, M. A., Lin, F. Y. & Schneerson, R. (2006). Are antibodies to the capsular polysaccharide of Neisseria meningitidis group B and Escherichia coli K1 associated with immunopathology? Vaccine 24, 221–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stephens, D. S. (2007). Conquering the meningococcus. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31, 3–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Suker, J., Feavers, I. M., Achtman, M., Morelli, G., Wang, J.-F. & Maiden, M. C. J. (1994). The porA gene in serogroup A meningococci: evolutionary stability and mechanism of genetic variation. Mol Microbiol 12, 253–265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Swaminathan, B., Matar, G. M., Reeves, M. W., Graves, L. M., Ajello, G., Bibb, W. F., Helsel, L. O., Morales, M., Dronavalli, H. & other authors (1996). Molecular subtyping of Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B: comparison of five methods. J Clin Microbiol 34, 1468–1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Swartley, J. S., Marfin, A. A., Edupuganti, S., Liu, L. J., Cieslak, P., Perkins, B., Wenger, J. D. & Stephens, D. S. (1997). Capsule switching of Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 271–276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Taha, M. K., Alonso, J. M., Cafferkey, M., Caugant, D. A., Clarke, S. C., Diggle, M. A., Fox, A., Frosch, M., Gray, S. J. & other authors (2005). Interlaboratory comparison of PCR-based identification and genogrouping of Neisseria meningitidis. J Clin Microbiol 43, 144–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Thompson, E. A. L., Feavers, I. M. & Maiden, M. C. J. (2003). Antigenic diversity of meningococcal enterobactin receptor FetA, a vaccine component. Microbiology 149, 1849–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Trotter, C. L., Chandra, M., Cano, R., Larrauri, A., Ramsay, M. E., Brehony, C., Jolley, K. A., Maiden, M. C., Heuberger, S. & other authors (2007). A surveillance network for meningococcal disease in Europe. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31, 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Urwin, R., Russell, J. E., Thompson, E. A., Holmes, E. C., Feavers, I. M. & Maiden, M. C. (2004). Distribution of surface protein variants among hyperinvasive meningococci: implications for vaccine design. Infect Immun 72, 5955–5962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. van den Dobbelsteen, G. P. J. M., van Dijken, H. H., Pillai, S. & van Alphen, L. (2007). Immunogenicity of a combination vaccine containing pneumococcal conjugates and meningococcal PorA OMVs. Vaccine 25, 2491–2496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vogel, U., Claus, H. & Frosch, M. (2000). Rapid serogroup switching in Neisseria meningitidis. N Engl J Med 342, 219–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yazdankhah, S. P., Kriz, P., Tzanakaki, G., Kremastinou, J., Kalmusova, J., Musilek, M., Alvestad, T., Jolley, K. A., Wilson, D. J. & other authors (2004). Distribution of serogroups and genotypes among disease-associated and carried isolates of Neisseria meningitidis from the Czech Republic, Greece, and Norway. J Clin Microbiol 42, 5146–5153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Microbiology Society

RESOURCES