Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2009 Jun;46(2):486–499. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.002

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Accuracy measurements for four different types of normalization methods. Participant’s images were first linearly normalized to the ICBM space to create a ‘prepared’ image. Type III WMPM was transformed to the ‘prepared’ images using affine, SPM5, and LDDMM. We used T1-weighted contrast (SPM-T1) and FA contrast (SPM-FA) to drive the non-linear normalization of SPM5. Manual delineation was considered the ‘gold standard,’ and kappa analysis between manual delineation and various automated delineation was performed.