Abstract
Microparticles (MPs) are small vesicles, ranging in size from 0.1 μm to 2 μm, originating from plasma membranes of endothelial cells, platelets, leukocytes and erythrocytes. MPs can transfer antigens and receptors to cell types that are different from their cell of origin. Circulating MPs provide a procoagulant aminophospholipid surface for the assembly of the specific enzymes of coagulation. Both tissue factor and phosphatidylserine are exposed on MP outer membranes. In addition, MPs can play a significant role in vascular function and inflammation by modulating nitric oxide and prostacyclin production in endothelial cells, and stimulating cytokine release and tissue factor induction in endothelial cells, as well as monocyte chemotaxis and adherence to the endothelium. Finally, increased levels of MPs have been found in the presence of acute coronary syndromes, ischemic stroke, diabetes, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia. From a practical point of view, MPs could be considered to be important markers of cardiovascular risk, as well as surrogate end points for assessing the efficacy of new drugs and therapies.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis, Coagulation, Inflammation, Microparticles
Abstract
Les microparticules (MP) sont de petites vésicules de 0,1 μm à 2 μm qui proviennent des membranes plasmiques des cellules endothéliales, des plaquettes, des leucocytes et des érythrocytes. Les MP peuvent transférer des antigènes et des récepteurs à d’autres types de cellules que leur cellule d’origine. Les MP circulantes procurent une surface amiophospholipidique procoagulante à l’ensemble des enzymes spécifiques de coagulation. Tant le facteur tissulaire que la phosphatidylsérine sont exposés sur les membranes externes des MP. De plus, les MP peuvent jouer un rôle important dans la fonction et l’inflammation vasculaires en modulant la production de monoxyde d’azote et de prostacycline dans les cellules endothéliales et en stimulant la libération de cytokine et l’induction de facteur tissulaire dans les cellules endothéliales, de même que la chimiotaxie monocytaire et l’adhésion à l’endothélium. Enfin, on constate des taux accrus de MP en présence de syndromes coronariens aigus, d’accidents ischémiques cérébraux, de diabète, d’hypertension systémique et pulmonaire ainsi que d’hypertriglycéridémie. Sur le plan pratique, les MP peuvent être considérées comme d’importants marqueurs de risque cardiovasculaire et comme paramètres ultimes auxiliaires pour évaluer l’efficacité de nouveaux médicaments et de nouvelles thérapies.
In 1967, membrane fragments of platelet origin with procoagulant activity were described in human plasma as ‘platelet dust’ (1,2). This ‘dust’ consisted of small vesicles (less than 0.1 μm in diameter) capable of promoting coagulation. Subsequently, the release of microparticles (MPs) from endothelial cells (ECs), vascular smooth muscle cells, leukocytes, lymphocytes and erythrocytes has also been shown in vitro. Some of these MP populations have been found in the blood of both patients and healthy individuals.
MPs might play a significant role in the interactions among circulating and vascular cells. Several papers (3–9) have described the possible effects of MPs in regulating vascular function, and their potential physiological and pathological involvement in cardiovascular diseases. In addition, MPs have recently been proposed as new therapeutic targets in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, in consideration of their prothrombogenic and proinflammatory actions (10).
The present review discusses the putative roles played by MPs in inflammation, coagulation and endothelial/vascular function, as well as the possible and importance of MPs in the diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of atherosclerotic diseases.
FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF MPs AND MOLECULAR BASIS OF THEIR FORMATION
MPs are phospholipid- and protein-rich submicron particles. These fragments, originating from plasma membranes of eukaryotic cells, typically contain cell surface proteins and cytoplasmic components of their cell of origin (11,12), ranging in size from 0.1 μm to 2 μm. More precisely, vesicles larger than 100 nm in diameter originating from plasma membranes are usually called MPs, while smaller vesicles originating from the endoplasmic reticulum are described as ‘exosomes’. Finally, larger particles (greater than 1.5 μm) containing nuclear components are called ‘apoptotic bodies’ (3,13,14).
MPs are released from cell membranes by triggers such as cytokines, thrombin, endotoxins, hypoxia and shear stress, capable of inducing activation or apoptosis (3). It is unclear whether the mechanisms underlying MP formation during these two events are identical (9).
The activation of platelets by different agonists promotes platelet aggregation and secretion, as well as membrane vesiculation and MP release. Thrombin, collagen and adenosine diphosphate bind specific transmembrane receptors that, through changes in second messenger concentrations, can modulate cellular responses (15,16). Alternatively, the intracellular concentration of the second messenger can be directly changed by agents such as calcium ionophores. The increase in intra-cellular levels of calcium ions leads to the activation of calpain, with subsequent degradation of cytoskeletal proteins. This mechanism is believed to play a putative role in MP formation (15–17).
In the apoptotic pathway, caspase-3 plays an important role, activating the rho-associated kinase, resulting in the release of apoptotic membrane vesicles (18).
The proteinic composition of MPs reflects the composition of the cell membrane from which they are released. This includes constitutively expressed antigens, and antigens that have been induced on the parent cell by the activating or apoptotic triggers, leading to MP release (19).
The composition and distribution of constitutive cell membrane phospholipids are highly specific. Phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylethanolamine are mainly sequestered in the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane, while phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin are mainly located in the outer membrane layer (11,20). This asymmetric distribution is essential for biomembrane function and is under the control of a complex transmembrane enzymatic balance that involves enzymes such as gelsolin (present only in platelets), aminophospholipid translocase, floppase, scramblase and calpain (7). During cell activation and the subsequent increase of Ca2+ concentration in the cytosol, plasma membranes are modified and phospholipid asymmetry is compromised. In particular, the loss of phospholipid asymmetry results in the exposure of PS on the outer cell surface. Because PS efficiently binds coagulation factors (21), it leads to a prothrombotic state (22–25). Furthermore, following cellular activation, the cytoskeleton undergoes several changes. Spectrin and actin are cleft, and protein anchorage to the cytoskeleton is disrupted. Thus, an increase in bleb formation takes place and bleb-generated MPs are released into the circulating blood. It has been shown that platelet MPs (PMPs) express P-selectin, the integrin glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa, platelet endothelium adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1 [CD31]), CD63, CD42a and CD42b (7,15,26). GP IIb/IIIa blockade inhibits platelet PS exposure by potentiating translocase and attenuating scramblase activities (27). Endothelial cell MPs (EMPs) express CD31, CD34, CD51, CD54, CD146, E selectin and endoglin, and bind von Willebrand factor (28). CD4, CD3 and CD8 are present at the surface of leukocyte MPs (29,30).
MPs bear antigens of their cell of origin and can transfer these surface signalling molecules to other types of cells. The binding of surface antigens to their specific counter-receptors leads to the activation of intracellular signalling pathways (6). In this way, MPs behave as vectors disseminating biological information to the cells of the vascular compartment, which expose appropriate counter-receptors for the ligands they harbour (31).
METHODS FOR MP MEASUREMENT
MP analysis has the potential to enter the mainstream of clinical testing because it may provide important data for investigating various vascular disorders, such as acute coronary syndromes, venous thrombosis and stroke. However, the wide variety of methodologies used by different laboratories to measure circulating MPs has occasionally provided inconsistent or conflicting results (32), making data analysis and clinical correlations challenging (33).
The main methods of MP detection include flow cytometry, enzyme-linked immunoassays and functional coagulative assays (32,34,35). Lal et al (36) recently developed a new method for the detection of plasma MPs using a fluorescence-based antibody array system that can rapidly identify the cell origin of MPs.
MP counting, as currently performed by flow cytometry, certainly needs to be standardized. In this respect, the preanalytical phases of blood sampling and MP separation according to standardized centrifugation steps (37) are key factors. Robert et al (38) recently developed a strategy for PMP counting with a widely available flow cytometry instrument (Cytomics FC500; Beckman Coulter Inc, USA), using size-calibrated fluorescent beads in a fixed numerical ratio (Megamix; BioCytex, France). The intra- and interinstrument reproducibility was tested by using annexin and CD41 coexpression to count MPs in previously frozen aliquots of the same platelet-free plasma over four months and in platelet-free plasma from 10 healthy subjects in three independent flow cytometers. Using the three instruments, similar PMP counts were obtained. With the use of this standardized flow cytometry protocol, PMP levels were significantly higher in women than in men. This strategy for PMP count standardization could represent a first step toward multicentre studies, and could also be used for MPs derived from other cell types. However, the measurement of circulating MPs still presents standardization problems and is not yet widely available in clinical practice.
ROLE OF MPs IN COAGULATION
Because PMPs were the first species identified, the studies on the role played by MPs in physiological and pathological conditions have, for a long time, concerned blood coagulation and hemostasis.
Activated platelets and circulating MPs provide a procoagulant aminophospholipid surface for the assembly of the specific enzymes of the coagulation cascade. After activation, MPs exhibit negatively charged phospholipids (chiefly PS) at their surface, which, once in contact with circulating blood factors, allow the local concentrations necessary to achieve optimal thrombin generation as well as efficient hemostasis (39). PS increases the procoagulant activity of tissue factor (TF). TF and PS are both exposed on MP outer membranes and are considered to be the main initiators of the coagulation cascade (8,40). TF is a key player in the onset of blood coagulation (40) because in vivo coagulation is initiated when TF binds factor VIIa and catalyzes its activation. TF circulates in plasma, largely on monocyte/macrophage-derived MPs that can bind activated platelets through a mechanism involving P-selectin GP ligand-1 (PSGL-1) on MPs and P-selectin on platelets (41). TF has been identified on leukocyte MPs, EMPs and PMPs (12,19,42–46). Del Conde et al (47) found that MPs derived from monocyte/macrophage cholesterol-rich rafts are selectively enriched in both TF and PSGL-1, and deficient in CD45, suggesting that they arise from distinct membrane microdomains. Interestingly, the shedding of MPs was significantly reduced with depletion of membrane cholesterol. MPs not only bound the activated platelets, but fused with them via PSGL-1, transferring lipids and proteins, including TF, in the plasma membrane. The phospholipids on the surface of MPs from platelets and ECs provide a number of binding sites for factors Va, VIII, IXa and IIa (15,48–50). EMPs express ultra-large von Willebrand factor multimers, which promote and stabilize platelet aggregates (51). These findings provide a mechanism by which blood coagulation can be initiated and propagated on the surface of activated platelets (47). MPs can also contribute to the development of platelet- and fibrin-rich thrombi at sites of vascular injury, through the recruitment of cells and the accumulation of TF (52).
Whether MPs are procoagulant in vivo is not a completely resolved issue, but several data suggest that MP-mediated coagulation may be clinically significant. For instance, an association between the number of circulating MPs and the risk of thromboembolic complications has repeatedly been demonstrated (9).
The procoagulant activity of MPs can be quantified using the thrombin generation test. In this system, MPs supply the procoagulant surface, while TF and plasma provide the necessary coagulation factors. By adding calcium ions, coagulation factors bind to MPs to initiate coagulation. In this assay, the generation of thrombin is dependent on the presence and activity of MPs, and in their absence, no coagulation would occur (9).
ROLE OF MPs IN INFLAMMATION AND VASCULAR FUNCTION
EMPs might directly lead to the development of endothelial dysfunction. In fact, in vitro experiments have shown that EMPs might regulate vascular tone by modulating both nitric oxide (NO) and prostacyclin production in ECs (5). Moreover, the oxidized phospholipids in the MPs released from ECs exposed to oxidative stress may be particularly active in causing monocyte adherence to ECs and activation of neutrophils (53,54).
A further key feature in atherogenesis is leukocyte adhesion to ECs, with subsequent transendothelial migration of leukocytes (55). Specific adhesion molecules on ECs interact with ligands that are present not only on leukocytes, but also on leukocyte-derived MPs. Mesri and Altieri (56,57) suggested that leukocyte MPs stimulate cytokine release and TF induction in ECs by activating a signalling pathway involving the tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase-1. This may lead to increased proinflammatory and procoagulant activity in ECs.
High shear stress-induced activation of platelets and the addition of PMPs may also enhance the expression of cell adhesion molecules, and the production of cytokines in the human monocytic leukemia cell line (THP-1) and ECs (58,59). Moreover, PMPs may deliver arachidonic acid to ECs, with consequent upregulation of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and subsequent monocyte adhesion (60). PMPs can also promote leukocyte-leukocyte aggregation (61), as well as monocyte chemotaxis (60) through the transformation of MP arachidonic acid into the proinflammatory and vasoconstricting thromboxane A2 (62). However, PMPs may also induce the endothelial production of cyclooxygenase-2 and of the vasodilating prostacyclin. Finally, PMPs contain a significant amount of RANTES (Regulated on Activation, Normal T cell Expressed and Secreted), an inflammatory chemokine, and can deposit it on activated ECs, triggering monocyte adhesion on these cells (63). By means of these mechanisms, PMPs can modulate the inflammatory and vasomotor response (64). However, although MPs may have deleterious, as well as beneficial effects on vascular function in vitro, there is not yet any direct evidence that they play a significant role in vascular dysfunction in vivo. Specific studies are needed to address this question.
ROLE OF MPs IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Although in vitro studies have suggested various possible molecular mechanisms leading to MP formation (2,7,14), the precise mechanisms of in vivo MP generation remain unclear. Moreover, it is also unclear whether increased MPs are a cause or a consequence of vascular disease states because cardiovascular disease-related factors, such as metabolic disturbances, cytokines and, possibly, infectious agents, can trigger MP production.
It was suggested that MPs can spread proinflammatory and procoagulant mediators throughout the body in response to a stimulus, including activation and apoptosis, contributing to the severity of the disease (9). On the other hand, Agouni et al (65) reported possible beneficial effects of MPs in a mouse model of endothelial dysfunction. After injection in mice, MPs from human activated/apoptotic T-lymphocytes were able to stimulate NO production from ECs, enhancing endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation. Furthermore, the same MPs reversed endothelial dysfunction in a model of mouse coronary arteries subjected to ischemia/reperfusion. This effect was mediated by the morphogen sonic hedgehog (Shh), a modulator of NO production carried by MPs that is also involved in embryonic and adult development. Thus, MPs might exert beneficial or deleterious effects for the vascular wall depending on their cellular origin, the stimuli involved in their cellular generation and the clinical setting (66,67).
Nevertheless, owing to the complex procoagulant and proinflammatory activities of MPs, research has mainly been focused on their possible role in cardiovascular diseases (9). There is evidence that MP levels are increased in patients with cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, including acute coronary syndromes, diabetes, hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia (29,68–72) (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Microparticle (MP) involvement in cardiovascular diseases
Condition | MP type | References |
---|---|---|
Atherosclerosis | Plaque MPs | 73–75 |
Coronary endothelial dysfunction | Apoptotic MPs | 76,83 |
Acute coronary syndromes | Procoagulant MPs | 29,69 |
Acute ischemic stroke | EMPs | 77–79 |
End-stage renal failure | EMPs | 80 |
Hypertension | EMPs, PMPs | 71 |
Pulmonary hypertension | Procoagulant MPs | 81 |
Type 2 diabetes | TF exposing PMPs | 82,83 |
The metabolic syndrome | Circulating MPs | 84 |
Hypertriglyceridemia | EMPs | 70 |
EMPs Endothelium-derived MPs; PMPs Platelet-derived MPs; TF Tissue factor
Human atherosclerotic plaques contain MPs released during cell activation or apoptosis. Plaque MPs bear TF activity and expose PS, a major determinant of their procoagulant activity (73,74). Leroyer et al (75) demonstrated that plaque MPs originate from macrophages, erythrocytes and smooth muscle cells, whereas circulating MPs are mainly derived from platelets. MPs were more abundant and thrombogenic in plaques than in plasma. However, the study showed that most of the circulating MPs do not originate from ruptured plaques, but are generated within the blood compartment or at the blood-vessel interface.
Atherosclerosis is initiated and propagated by EC dysfunction. Werner et al (76) recently showed that EC apoptosis is independently involved in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction, and circulating CD31+/annexin V+ apoptotic MPs positively correlated with the impairment of coronary endothelial function, independent of classic risk factors.
Elevated levels of MPs with procoagulant potential are present in the circulating blood of patients with recent clinical signs of coronary plaque disruption and thrombosis (29). EMPs are associated with high-risk coronary lesions, including multiple, irregular lesions, those with an eccentric appearance and those with thrombi (69). Thus, EMPs may be a useful marker for the risk of acute coronary events.
High levels of circulating EMPs were also found in patients with acute ischemic stroke (77–79).
Furthermore, circulating EMPs are closely associated with vascular dysfunction in patients with end-stage renal failure (80).
Preston et al (71) suggested that EMPs and PMPs increase in severely hypertensive patients.
MPs bearing TF and endoglin as well as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and chemoattractant protein-1 were elevated in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension compared with controls (81). It was even suggested that MPs might prove to be valuable tools in determining the severity of pulmonary hypertension.
In patients with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), Diamant et al (82) found elevated numbers of TF-exposing PMPs. Although this MP-associated TF did not show any procoagulant activity, it might play a role in other processes such as angiogenesis, cell growth and signal transduction. Patients with DM also showed elevated levels of EMPs (83). In particular, CD144 EMP levels were significantly higher in DM patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) than in those without CAD, and allowed the identification of a sub-population of DM patients who had CAD without typical chest symptoms.
In patients with the metabolic syndrome, circulating MPs of various origin are increased and impair endothelial function (84).
Ferreira et al (70) evaluated the possible relationship between levels of EMPs and changes of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia in healthy normolipemic subjects after a single high-fat meal. In these subjects, the high-fat meal led to a significant elevation of plasma EMPs, suggesting structural endothelial damage caused by triglycerides, followed by the impairment of endothelial function (85–87).
MPs AS A THERAPEUTIC TARGET IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
Due to their procoagulant and proinflammatory effects on vascular walls and target organs (10,88), MPs might also be considered to be a novel therapeutic target in cardiovascular diseases.
In 1998, Nomura et al (89) observed that cilostazol, a selective cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor and antiplatelet agent, decreased the levels of PMPs in patients with noninsulin-dependent DM (NIDDM). Subsequently, in hypertensive patients with or without NIDDM, the same group found that treatment with losartan (alone or in combination with simvastatin) significantly decreased the levels of monocyte-derived MPs (90), and PMPs and EMPs (91). Similar results on PMPs and monocyte-derived MPs were obtained in patients with NIDDM treated with ticlopidine (92).
In hypertensive patients, Labiós et al (93) observed that eprosartan significantly reduced blood pressure and normalized the number of MPs after blood shear exposure.
A powerful antiplatelet drug, the GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab also reduces excessive PMP formation and shear stress-induced platelet activation (94). Interestingly, the short-term high-dose administration of vitamin C reduces the number of circulating apoptotic MPs in patients with congestive heart failure and suppresses EC apoptosis in vivo, which might contribute to the beneficial effect of vitamin C supplementation on endothelial function (95).
More recently, Nomura et al (96) found that eicosapentaenoic acid significantly reduced the number of circulating PMPs in hyperlipidemic diabetic patients, contributing to the prevention of vascular complications. This effect was enhanced by the addition of pitavastatin, and is in agreement with the results of a study investigating the favourable effects of n-3 fatty acids on the levels of PMPs and monocyte-derived MPs after myocardial infarction (97).
Because activated peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) can inhibit inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, and may also be effective in the primary prevention of cardiovascular events (98), Esposito et al (99) evaluated the short-term effects of the PPAR-gamma ligand pioglitazone on circulating EMPs in patients with the metabolic syndrome. Pioglitazone reduced circulating EMPs independently of the improvement of insulin sensitivity. Moreover, experimental data on the PPAR-gamma agonist rosiglitazone showed an inhibition of MP-induced vascular hyporeactivity through the regulation of proinflammatory proteins (100).
Overall, these results suggest that plasma MPs could be a promising target in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.
CONCLUSIONS
MPs of various origin may be considered to be ‘partners in crime’ in all crucial steps of atherosclerosis (101). In fact, MPs play a role in inflammation, coagulation, endothelial and vascular function, and apoptosis. MPs could modulate the cross-talk between the cellular elements of the coagulative and inflammatory system, through the transfer of signalling molecules and receptors of their cell of origin to other cell types.
Several studies have shown that MPs are increased in patients with acute coronary syndromes, stroke, diabetes, pulmonary and systemic hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia. Thus, circulating MPs could be considered to be important markers of cardiovascular risk (102), with prognostic implications. However, the clinical importance of MPs in vascular disease states remains to be fully elucidated because it is unclear whether MPs are a cause or a consequence of these conditions. Conversely, available data from small studies suggest that MPs could also be considered a novel therapeutic target in cardiovascular diseases (10,88).
Recent progress in proteomics has shown that the protein content of lymphocyte MPs is highly influenced by the cell culture medium and type of stimulus used for MP generation (103). Thus, Chironi et al (104) suggested special caution in extrapolating laboratory experimental results to the clinical setting because a given MP type may have different compositions and biological behavioural patterns in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the different methods of measurement, the lack of standardization and the various types of MPs to be measured may lead to insufficiently reliable results (32). In addition, such methods of measurement are not yet widely available.
Future research is needed before circulating MPs are considered to be of significant clinical interest. Only a complete understanding of the formation, composition, release and mechanisms of action of the various MPs will allow the development of novel approaches in the treatment of atherothrombosis-related diseases (105,106).
REFERENCES
- 1.Wolf P. The nature and significance of platelet products in human plasma. Br J Haematol. 1967;13:269–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1967.tb08741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boulanger CM, Amabile N, Tedgui A. Circulating microparticles: A potential prognostic marker for atherosclerotic vascular disease. Hypertension. 2006;48:180–6. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000231507.00962.b5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.VanWijk MJ, VanBavel E, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Microparticles in cardiovascular diseases. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;59:277–87. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(03)00367-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Martínez MC, Tesse A, Zobairi F, Andriantsitohaina R. Shed membrane microparticles from circulating and vascular cells in regulating vascular function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288:H1004–H1009. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00842.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brodsky SV, Zhang F, Nasjletti A, Goligorsky MS. Endothelium-derived microparticles impair endothelial function in vitro. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004;286:H1910–H1915. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01172.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lynch SF, Ludlam CA. Plasma microparticles and vascular disorders. Br J Haematol. 2007;137:36–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2007.06514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Piccin A, Murphy WG, Smith OP. Circulating microparticles: Pathophysiology and clinical implications. Blood Rev. 2007;21:157–71. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2006.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morel O, Toti F, Hugel B, et al. Procoagulant microparticles: Disrupting the vascular homeostasis equation? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:2594–604. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000246775.14471.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Diamant M, Tushuizen ME, Sturk A, Nieuwland R. Cellular microparticles: New players in the field of vascular disease? Eur J Clin Invest. 2004;34:392–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2004.01355.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meziani F, Tesse A, Andriantsitohaina R. Microparticles are vectors of paradoxical information in vascular cells including the endothelium: Role in health and diseases. Pharmacol Rep. 2008;60:75–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zwaal RF, Schroit AJ. Pathophysiologic implications of membrane phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood. 1997;89:1121–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Combes V, Simon AC, Grau GE, et al. In vitro generation of endothelial microparticles and possible prothrombotic activity in patients with lupus anticoagulant. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:93–102. doi: 10.1172/JCI4985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Théry C, Zitvogel L, Amigorena S. Exosomes: Composition, biogenesis and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:569–79. doi: 10.1038/nri855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hugel B, Martínez MC, Kunzelmann C, Freyssinet JM. Membrane microparticles: Two sides of the coin. Physiology (Bethesda) 2005;20:22–7. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00029.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Horstman LL, Ahn YS. Platelet microparticles: A wide-angle perspective. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1999;30:111–42. doi: 10.1016/s1040-8428(98)00044-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nieuwland R, Sturk A. Platelet-derived microparticles. In: Michelson AD, editor. Platelets. London: Academic Press, Elsevier Science; 2002. pp. 255–65. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shcherbina A, Remold-O’Donnell E. Role of caspase in a subset of human platelet activation responses. Blood. 1999;93:4222–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Coleman ML, Sahai EA, Yeo M, Bosch M, Dewar A, Olson MF. Membrane blebbing during apoptosis results from caspase-mediated activation of ROCK I. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:339–45. doi: 10.1038/35070009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jimenez JJ, Jy W, Mauro LM, Horstman LL, Ahn YS. Elevated endothelial microparticles in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Findings from brain and renal microvascular cell culture and patients with active disease. Br J Haematol. 2001;112:81–90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02516.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Devaux PF. Static and dynamic lipid asymmetry in cell membranes. Biochemistry. 1991;30:1163–73. doi: 10.1021/bi00219a001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pitney WR, Dacie JV. A simple method of studying the generation of thrombin in recalcified plasma; application in the investigation of haemophilia. J Clin Pathol. 1953;6:9–14. doi: 10.1136/jcp.6.1.9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bevers EM, Comfurius P, van Rijn JL, Hemker HC, Zwaal RF. Generation of prothrombin-converting activity and the exposure of phosphatidylserine at the outer surface of platelets. Eur J Biochem. 1982;122:429–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb05898.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Zwaal RF, Bevers EM. Platelet phospholipid asymmetry and its significance in hemostasis. Subcell Biochem. 1983;9:299–334. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3533-7_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.van Dieijen G, Tans G, Rosing J, Hemker HC. The role of phospholipid and factor VIIIa in the activation of bovine factor X. J Biol Chem. 1981;256:3433–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rosing J, Speijer H, Zwaal RF. Prothrombin activation on phospholipid membranes with positive electrostatic potential. Biochemistry. 1988;27:8–11. doi: 10.1021/bi00401a002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ueba T, Haze T, Sugiyama M, et al. Level, distribution and correlates of platelet-derived microparticles in healthy individuals with special reference to the metabolic syndrome. Thromb Haemost. 2008;100:280–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Razmara M, Hu H, Masquelier M, Li N. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade inhibits platelet aminophospholipid exposure by potentiating translocase and attenuating scramblase activity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:999–1008. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6546-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mutin M, Dignat-George F, Sampol J. Immunologic phenotype of cultured endothelial cells: Quantitative analysis of cell surface molecules. Tissue Antigens. 1997;50:449–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1997.tb02899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mallat Z, Benamer H, Hugel B, et al. Elevated levels of shed membrane microparticles with procoagulant potential in the peripheral circulating blood of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2000;101:841–3. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.8.841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Martin S, Tesse A, Hugel B, et al. Impaired glucose tolerance is associated with increased serum concentrations of interleukin 6 and co-regulated acute-phase proteins but not TNF-alpha or its receptors. Diabetologia. 2002;45:805–12. doi: 10.1007/s00125-002-0829-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Morel O, Toti F, Hugel B, Freyssinet JM. Cellular microparticles: A disseminated storage pool of bioactive vascular effectors. Curr Opin Hematol. 2004;11:156–64. doi: 10.1097/01.moh.0000131441.10020.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jy W, Horstman LL, Jimenez JJ, et al. Measuring circulating cell-derived microparticles. J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:1842–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00936.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shah MD, Bergeron AL, Dong JF, López JA. Flow cytometric measurement of microparticles: Pitfalls and protocol modifications. Platelets. 2008;19:365–72. doi: 10.1080/09537100802054107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Enjeti AK, Lincz LF, Seldon M. Detection and measurement of microparticles: An evolving research tool for vascular biology. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2007;33:771–9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1000369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shet AS. Characterizing blood microparticles: Technical aspects and challenges. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4:769–74. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lal S, Brown A, Nguyen L, Braet F, Dyer W, Dos Remedios C. Using antibody arrays to detect microparticles from acute coronary syndrome patients based on cluster of differentiation (CD) antigen expression. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:799–804. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M800335-MCP200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dignat George F. Microparticles in vascular diseases. Thromb Haemost. 2008;122(Suppl 1):555–9. doi: 10.1016/S0049-3848(08)70020-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Robert S, Poncelet P, Lacroix R, et al. Standardization of platelet-derived microparticle counting using calibrated beads and a Cytomics FC500 routine flow cytometer: A first step towards multicenter studies? J Thromb Haemost. 2009;7:190–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.03200.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lentz BR. Exposure of platelet membrane phosphatidylserine regulates blood coagulation. Prog Lipid Res. 2003;42:423–38. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7827(03)00025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wiiger MT, Prydz H. The changing faces of tissue factor biology. A personal tribute to the understanding of the “extrinsic coagulation activation”. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98:38–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Falati S, Liu Q, Gross P, et al. Accumulation of tissue factor into developing thrombi in vivo is dependent upon microparticle P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 and platelet P-selectin. J Exp Med. 2003;197:1585–98. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Satta N, Toti F, Feugeas O, et al. Monocyte vesiculation is a possible mechanism for dissemination of membrane-associated procoagulant activities and adhesion molecules after stimulation by lipopolysaccharide. J Immunol. 1994;153:3245–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Biró E, Sturk-Maquelin KN, Vogel GM, et al. Human cell-derived microparticles promote thrombus formation in vivo in a tissue factor-dependent manner. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1:2561–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00456.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shet AS, Aras O, Gupta K, et al. Sickle blood contains tissue factor-positive microparticles derived from endothelial cells and monocytes. Blood. 2003;102:2678–83. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Abid Hussein MN, Meesters EW, Osmanovic N, Romijn FP, Nieuwland R, Sturk A. Antigenic characterization of endothelial cell-derived microparticles and their detection ex vivo. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1:2434–43. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Siddiqui FA, Desai H, Amirkhosravi A, Amaya M, Francis JL. The presence and release of tissue factor from human platelets. Platelets. 2002;13:247–53. doi: 10.1080/09537100220146398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Del Conde I, Shrimpton CN, Thiagarajan P, López JA. Tissue-factor-bearing microvesicles arise from lipid rafts and fuse with activated platelets to initiate coagulation. Blood. 2005;106:1604–11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Berckmans RJ, Neiuwland R, Böing AN, Romijn FP, Hack CE, Sturk A. Cell-derived microparticles circulate in healthy humans and support low grade thrombin generation. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85:639–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sims PJ, Wiedmer T, Esmon CT, Weiss HJ, Shattil SJ. Assembly of the platelet prothrombinase complex is linked to vesiculation of the platelet plasma membrane. Studies in Scott syndrome: An isolated defect in platelet procoagulant activity. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:17049–57. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hamilton KK, Hattori R, Esmon CT, Sims PJ. Complement proteins C5b-9 induce vesiculation of the endothelial plasma membrane and expose catalytic surface for assembly of the prothrombinase enzyme complex. J Biol Chem. 1990;265:3809–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jy W, Jimenez JJ, Mauro LM, et al. Endothelial microparticles induce formation of platelet aggregates via a von Willebrand factor/ristocetin dependent pathway, rendering them resistant to dissociation. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:1301–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2005.01384.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hrachovinová I, Cambien B, Hafezi-Moghadam A, et al. Interaction of P-selectin and PSGL-1 generates microparticles that correct hemostasis in a mouse model of hemophilia A. Nat Med. 2003;9:1020–5. doi: 10.1038/nm899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Patel KD, Zimmerman GA, Prescott SM, McIntyre TM. Novel leukocyte agonists are released by endothelial cells exposed to peroxide. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:15168–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Huber J, Vales A, Mitulovic G, et al. Oxidized membrane vesicles and blebs from apoptotic cells contain biologically active oxidized phospholipids that induce monocyte-endothelial interactions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22:101–7. doi: 10.1161/hq0102.101525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Issekutz TB, Issekutz AC, Movat HZ. The in vivo quantitation and kinetics of monocyte migration into acute inflammatory tissue. Am J Pathol. 1981;103:47–55. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mesri M, Altieri DC. Endothelial cell activation by leukocyte microparticles. J Immunol. 1998;161:4382–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mesri M, Altieri DC. Leukocyte microparticles stimulate endothelial cell cytokine release and tissue factor induction in a JNK1 signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:23111–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.33.23111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nomura S, Tandon NN, Nakamura T, Cone J, Fukuhara S, Kambayashi J. High-shear-stress-induced activation of platelets and microparticles enhances expression of cell adhesion molecules in THP-1 and endothelial cells. Atherosclerosis. 2001;158:277–87. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(01)00433-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.MacKenzie A, Wilson HL, Kiss-Toth E, Dower SK, North RA, Surprenant A. Rapid secretion of interleukin-1beta by microvesicle shedding. Immunity. 2001;15:825–35. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00229-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Barry OP, Praticò D, Savani RC, FitzGerald GA. Modulation of monocyte-endothelial cell interactions by platelet microparticles. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:136–44. doi: 10.1172/JCI2592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Forlow SB, McEver RP, Nollert MU. Leukocyte-leukocyte interactions mediated by platelet microparticles under flow. Blood. 2000;95:1317–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Barry OP, Pratico D, Lawson JA, FitzGerald GA. Transcellular activation of platelets and endothelial cells by bioactive lipids in platelet microparticles. J Clin Invest. 1997;99:2118–27. doi: 10.1172/JCI119385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mause SF, von Hundelshausen P, Zernecke A, Koenen RR, Weber C. Platelet microparticles: A transcellular delivery system for RANTES promoting monocyte recruitment on endothelium. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1512–8. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000170133.43608.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Barry OP, Kazanietz MG, Praticò D, FitzGerald GA. Arachidonic acid in platelet microparticles up-regulates cyclooxygenase-2-dependent prostaglandin formation via a protein kinase C/mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:7545–56. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.11.7545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Agouni A, Mostefai HA, Porro C, et al. Sonic hedgehog carried by microparticles corrects endothelial injury through nitric oxide release. FASEB J. 2007;21:2735–41. doi: 10.1096/fj.07-8079com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Freyssinet JM. Cellular microparticles: What are they bad or good for? J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1:1655–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00309.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ahn YS, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, Horstman LL. More on: Cellular microparticles: What are they bad or good for? J Thromb Haemost. 2004;2:1215–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00797.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Héloire F, Weill B, Weber S, Batteux F. Aggregates of endothelial microparticles and platelets circulate in peripheral blood. Variations during stable coronary disease and acute myocardial infarction. Thromb Res. 2003;110:173–80. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00297-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bernal-Mizrachi L, Jy W, Fierro C, et al. Endothelial microparticles correlate with high-risk angiographic lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Int J Cardiol. 2004;97:439–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ferreira AC, Peter AA, Mendez AJ, et al. Postprandial hypertriglyceridemia increases circulating levels of endothelial cell microparticles. Circulation. 2004;110:3599–603. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148820.55611.6B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Preston RA, Jy W, Jimenez JJ, et al. Effects of severe hypertension on endothelial and platelet microparticles. Hypertension. 2003;41:211–7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000049760.15764.2d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sabatier F, Darmon P, Hugel B, et al. Type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients display different patterns of cellular microparticles. Diabetes. 2002;51:2840–5. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fadok VA, Bratton DL, Frasch SC, Warner ML, Henson PM. The role of phosphatidylserine in recognition of apoptotic cells by phagocytes. Cell Death Differ. 1998;5:551–62. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Mallat Z, Hugel B, Ohan J, Lesèche G, Freyssinet JM, Tedgui A. Shed membrane microparticles with procoagulant potential in human atherosclerotic plaques: A role for apoptosis in plaque thrombogenicity. Circulation. 1999;99:348–53. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.3.348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Leroyer AS, Isobe H, Lesèche G, et al. Cellular origins and thrombogenic activity of microparticles isolated from human atherosclerotic plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:772–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Werner N, Wassmann S, Ahlers P, Kosiol S, Nickenig G. Circulating CD31+/annexin V+ apoptotic microparticles correlate with coronary endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:112–6. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000191634.13057.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Cherian P, Hankey GJ, Eikelboom JW, et al. Endothelial and platelet activation in acute ischemic stroke and its etiological subtypes. Stroke. 2003;34:2132–7. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000086466.32421.F4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Williams JB, Jauch EC, Lindsell CJ, Campos B. Endothelial microparticle levels are similar in acute ischemic stroke and stroke mimics due to activation and not apoptosis/necrosis. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:685–90. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Simak J, Gelderman MP, Yu H, Wright V, Baird AE. Circulating endothelial microparticles in acute ischemic stroke: A link to severity, lesion volume and outcome. J Thromb Haemost. 2006;4:1296–302. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01911.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Amabile N, Guérin AP, Leroyer A, et al. Circulating endothelial microparticles are associated with vascular dysfunction in patients with end-stage renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3381–8. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005050535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bakouboula B, Morel O, Faure A, et al. Procoagulant membrane microparticles correlate with the severity of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:536–43. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200706-840OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Diamant M, Nieuwland R, Pablo RF, Sturk A, Smit JW, Radder JK. Elevated numbers of tissue-factor exposing microparticles correlate with components of the metabolic syndrome in uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2002;106:2442–7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000036596.59665.c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Koga H, Sugiyama S, Kugiyama K, et al. Elevated levels of VE-cadherin-positive endothelial microparticles in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1622–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Agouni A, Lagrue-Lak-Hal AH, Ducluzeau PH, et al. Endothelial dysfunction caused by circulating microparticles from patients with metabolic syndrome. Am J Pathol. 2008;173:1210–9. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2008.080228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Vogel RA, Corretti MC, Plotnick GD. Effect of a single high-fat meal on endothelial function in healthy subjects. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:350–4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00760-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hennig B, Toborek M, McClain CJ. High-energy diets, fatty acids and endothelial cell function: Iimplications for atherosclerosis. J Am Coll Nutr. 2001;20:97–105. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2001.10719021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kusterer K, Pohl T, Fortmeyer HP, et al. Chronic selective hypertriglyceridemia impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in rats. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;42:783–93. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(98)00331-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Azevedo LC, Pedro MA, Laurindo FR. Circulating microparticles as therapeutic targets in cardiovascular diseases. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov. 2007;2:41–51. doi: 10.2174/157489007779606121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Nomura S, Shouzu A, Omoto S, et al. Effect of cilostazol on soluble adhesion molecules and platelet-derived microparticles in patients with diabetes. Thromb Haemost. 1998;80:388–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Nomura S, Shouzu A, Omoto S, Nishikawa M, Iwasaka T. Effects of losartan and simvastatin on monocyte-derived microparticles in hypertensive patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2004;10:133–41. doi: 10.1177/107602960401000203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Nomura S, Shouzu A, Omoto S, Nishikawa M, Fukuhara S, Iwasaka T. Losartan and simvastatin inhibit platelet activation in hypertensive patients. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004;18:177–85. doi: 10.1007/s11239-005-0343-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Shouzu A, Nomura S, Omoto S, Hayakawa T, Nishikawa M, Iwasaka T. Effect of ticlopidine on monocyte-derived microparticles and activated platelet markers in diabetes mellitus. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2004;10:167–73. doi: 10.1177/107602960401000207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Labiós M, Martínez M, Gabriel F, Guiral V, Munoz A, Aznar J. Effect of eprosartan on cytoplasmic free calcium mobilization, platelet activation, and microparticle formation in hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2004;17:757–63. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2004.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Goto S, Tamura N, Li M, et al. Different effects of various anti-GPIIb-IIIa agents on shear-induced platelet activation and expression of procoagulant activity. J Thromb Haemost. 2003;1:2022–30. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00349.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Rössig L, Hoffmann J, Hugel B, et al. Vitamin C inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis in congestive heart failure. Circulation. 2001;104:2182–7. doi: 10.1161/hc4301.098284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Nomura S, Inami N, Shouzu A, et al. The effects of pitavastatin, eicosapentaenoic acid and combined therapy on platelet-derived microparticles and adiponectin in hyperlipidemic, diabetic patients. Platelets. 2009;20:16–22. doi: 10.1080/09537100802409921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Del Turco S, Basta G, Lazzerini G, et al. Effect of the administration of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on circulating levels of microparticles in patients with a previous myocardial infarction. Haematologica. 2008;93:892–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Calkin AC, Thomas MC. PPAR agonists and cardiovascular disease in diabetes. PPAR Res. 2008;2008:245410. doi: 10.1155/2008/245410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Esposito K, Ciotola M, Giugliano D. Pioglitazone reduces endothelial microparticles in the metabolic syndrome. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1926. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000231512.15115.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Tesse A, Al-Massarani G, Wangensteen R, Reitenbach S, Martínez MC, Andriantsitohaina R. Rosiglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, prevents microparticle-induced vascular hyporeactivity through the regulation of proinflammatory proteins. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2008;324:539–47. doi: 10.1124/jpet.107.130278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Morel O, Toti F, Bakouboula B, Grunebaum L, Freyssinet JM. Procoagulant microparticles: ‘Criminal partners’ in atherothrombosis and deleterious cellular exchanges. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2006;35:15–22. doi: 10.1159/000093538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Morel O, Toti F, Freyssinet JM. Markers of thrombotic disease: Procoagulant microparticles. Ann Pharm Fr. 2007;65:75–84. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4509(07)90020-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Miguet L, Sanglier S, Schaeffer C, Potier N, Mauvieux L, Van Dorsselaer A. Microparticles: A new tool for plasma membrane sub-cellular proteomic. Subcell Biochem. 2007;43:21–34. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5943-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Chironi GN, Boulanger CM, Simon A, Dignat-George F, Freyssinet JM, Tedgui A. Endothelial microparticles in diseases. Cell Tissue Res. 2009;335:143–51. doi: 10.1007/s00441-008-0710-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Leroyer AS, Tedgui A, Boulanger CM. Role of microparticles in atherothrombosis. J Intern Med. 2008;263:528–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2008.01957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Boulanger CM, Leroyer AS, Amabile N, Tedgui A. Circulating endothelial microparticles: A new marker of vascular injury. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris) 2008;57:149–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2008.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]