Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Oral Biol. 2010 Apr 7;55(5):358–364. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.03.010

Human bone marrow stromal cells display variable anatomic site-dependent response and recovery from irradiation

Monika Damek-Poprawa 1, Derek Stefanik 1,3, Lawrence M Levin 2, Sunday O Akintoye 1,*
PMCID: PMC2886662  NIHMSID: NIHMS195437  PMID: 20378097

Abstract

Objectives

Orofacial bone is commonly affected by osteoradionecrosis (ORN) during head and neck cancer radiotherapy possibly due to interactions of several factors including radiation damage to resident bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs). Irradiation causes DNA damage, triggers p53-dependent signaling resulting in either cell-cycle arrest or apoptosis. In same individuals, disproportionately higher rapid growth of orofacial BMSCs relative to those of axial/appendicular bones suggests their response to radiation is skeletally site-specific. We hypothesized that survival and osteogenic recovery capacity of irradiated human BMSCs is site-dependent based on anatomic skeletal site of origin.

Methods

Early passage BMSCs from maxilla, mandible and iliac crest of four normal volunteers were exposed to 2.5 to 10 Gy gamma radiation to evaluate clonogenic survival, effects on cell cycle, DNA damage, p53-related response and in vivo osteogenic regenerative capacity.

Results

Orofacial bone marrow stromal cells (OF-MSCs) survived higher radiation doses and recovered quicker than iliac crest (IC-MSCs) based on clonogenic survival, proliferation and accumulation in G0G1 phase. Post-irradiation p53 level was relatively unchanged but expression of p21, a downstream effector was moderately increased in OF-MSCs. Re-establishment of in vivo bone regeneration was delayed more in irradiated IC-MSCs relative to OF-MSCs.

Conclusions

Effect of irradiation on human BMSCs was skeletal site-specific with OF-MSCs displaying higher radio-resistance and quicker recovery than IC-MSCs.

Keywords: Bone marrow stromal cells, bone regeneration, osteoradionecrosis, ionizing radiation, jaws

Introduction

Radiotherapy of head and neck cancers often results in jaw osteoradionecrosis (ORN). About 10% of oro-pharyngeal cancer survivors treated with low dose radiation develop ORN, but increases when doses exceeds 60 Gy and irradiated field is subsequently traumatized (1). Pathogenesis of ORN is attributed to radiation-induced hypoxic-hypocellular-hypovascular tissue because osteoblast proliferation, osteocyte number and vascularity are suppressed in irradiated bone (2). Ionizing radiation induces G2/M cell cycle arrest and triggers a p53-dependent signaling pathway that may induce apoptotic cell death (3). However, this response is variable and cell type-dependent because p53 response causes cell cycle arrest in untransformed cells (4) and apoptosis in transformed cells (5). The dynamic equilibrium between different p53 downstream effectors including p21Waf1/Cip1 determines cell cycle progression and cell fate (6).

Specific cellular mechanisms initiating site-specific osteonecrosis are unclear making it challenging to heal osteonecrosis without surgical intervention. While radiation alters cellular survival mechanisms in bone cells (79), it is still unclear if bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) respond disparately to radiation in a skeletal site-dependent fashion to hinder bone healing. We hypothesized that BMSCs respond to irradiation disparately based on anatomic skeletal site of origin. Using maxilla, mandible and iliac crest BMSCs and therapeutically-relevant radiation doses (10), we evaluated disparity of cell survival, p53-related response and in vivo osteogenic regenerative capacity of irradiated BMSCs. We report that in same individuals, orofacial BMSCs were apparently more radio-resistant than those of iliac crest.

Materials and Methods

Isolation and culture of adult bone marrow stromal cells

Bone marrow samples from iliac crest and trabecular bone from maxilla and mandible were harvested from four healthy teenage volunteers according to an Institutional Review Board-approved protocol at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA as previously described (7). Nucleated cells from each sample were cultured to establish primary BMSC using α-modified minimum essential medium (α-MEM; Gibco-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Equitech Bio, Kerville, TX), 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin sulfate and 2 mM glutamine incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and air as previously described (7). Primary BMSCs from iliac crest (IC-MSCs) and maxilla and mandible orofacial bones (OF-MSCs) were further expanded or stored in liquid nitrogen until tested. All experiments were performed with early passage 2 to 4 BMSCs from four normal volunteers.

Clonogenic cell survival assay

OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs seeded at 1×104 cells/cm2 in T-75 flasks were grown to confluence before exposure to 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5 or 10 Gray (Gy) gamma radiation at room temperature using a self-shielded Mark I 137Cs irradiator with moving source (J. L. Shepherd, San Fernando, CA) at a rate of 1.25 Gy /minute. Control cells were maintained in the same conditions without irradiation. After trypsinization, cells were re-plated at increasing densities in 6-well plates. At 2 weeks and weekly medium renewals, cells were stained with crystal violet, washed with water and air-dried. Colonies containing ≥ 50 cells were scored microscopically, surviving cells were analyzed using log-linear survival plot and linear quadratic modeling. D0 was calculated from slope, while α and β were transformed using linear survival expression −ln (Surviving fraction/Dose) = α + β(Dose) (1113).

Cell viability assay

OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs seeded in 96-well plates at 1×104 cells/cm2 were subjected to 5 Gy radiation based on outcome of clonogenic survival assay above and clinical relevance. Time-dependent viability of irradiated versus non-irradiated cells was assessed at baseline, 6, 24 and 48 hours post-irradiation with WST-1 cell viability assay (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis IN) at absorbance of 450 nm using a Multiskan MCC automated microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) as previously described (14, 15).

Cell cycle analysis

Sub-confluent OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs in T-75 flasks were subjected to 5 Gy ionizing radiation. Cell populations in G0/G1, S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle were analyzed 24 hours post-irradiation as previously described (16, 17) using Becton Dickinson FacStar Plus flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

DNA damage by Comet assay

OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs were harvested 30 minutes after 5 Gy irradiation as described above. Non-irradiated cells were used as control to determine baseline endogenous DNA damage and similarly-matched BMSCs treated with 100 µM H2O2 were used as positive control for Comet tail formation. After alkaline unwinding, DNA was separated by alkaline electrophoresis for 30 min at 300 mA, stained with SYBR Green I and assessed with Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescent microscope (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NJ). Comet tail moment of ≥ 50 randomly selected cells from each group was quantified with Comet Score software (TriTek Corp., Summerduck, VA) and DNA damage was analyzed by logarithmic transformation of comet scores.

Apoptosis

The In-situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Fluorescein (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) was used to assess apoptosis in three different experiments following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs seeded at 8 × 103 cells/well in 8-well chamber slides (Nalge Nunc Int., Rochester, NY) were exposed to 5 Gy radiation as described above. Control cells received no radiation. Apoptosis was assessed at 24 hours or 3 days post-irradiation. Cells were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS pH 7.4) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hour at room temperature. After permeabilization with 0.1% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate buffer, cells were stained with TUNEL reaction mixture (18) and nuclei co-stained with 2 µg/mL DAPI (4’, 6-diamidino-2-pheylindole, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 10 minutes at room temperature in the dark. Number of TUNEL-positive cells per total cells was assessed with Nikon Eclipse 80i fluorescent microscope (Nikon Instruments, Melville, NJ).

Radiation-induced changes in p53 level by Western blot

Sub-confluent OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs seeded in duplicates 60 mm dishes at 1.5 × 104 cells/cm2 were irradiated at 0, 2.5 or 5 Gy. Total protein extracted 2 hours post-radiation using M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL) was quantified with BCA protein assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). 15 µg protein per lane was loaded in 4–12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) under reducing conditions. Western blotting was performed as previously described (19). Membranes were probed with 1:200 dilution each of mouse monoclonal anti-p53 (sc-126) and rabbit anti-p21 (sc-397) (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) followed by incubation with specie-specific secondary antibody: sheep anti-mouse or sheep anti-rabbit conjugated to horse radish peroxidase (GE Healthcare, UK). Monoclonal antibody to human β-actin (ab6276, Abcam, Cambridge, MA) at 1:1000 was used as protein loading control. Immunoreactive blots were analyzed digitally with Kodak Image Station 4000MM (Molecular Imaging Systems, Carestream Health, Rochester, NY).

Real time-PCR and p53-dependent gene profiling by microarray analysis

Forty eight hours after irradiation of OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs with 0, 2.5 or 5 Gy as above, total mRNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following manufacturer’s recommendations. cDNA was prepared from 2 µg of total mRNA using oligo(dT) and SuperScript First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Real-time PCR reaction was performed in ABI 7300 Real-Time PCR System using Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and cDNA-specific primers designed with Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) based on GenBank sequence (human p53, GenBank # NM000546, forward, 5’-CCCAGCCAAAGAAGAAACCA-3’, reverse, 5’-CAGCTCTCGGAACATCTCGAA-3’; human p21, GenBank # NM078467, forward, 5’-CCTGTCACTGTCTTGTACCCTTGT-3’, reverse, 5’-TTTGGAGTGGTAGAAATCTGTCATG-3’ and human TATA binding protein (TBP), GenBank # M55654, forward, 5’-GGAGCTGTGATGTGAAGTTTCCTA-3’, reverse, 5’-CCAGGAAATAACTCTGGCTCATAAC-3’ used as normalizing control). Gene expression levels were normalized to TBP and presented as relative fold change using the ΔΔCt method (Applied Biosystems, Foster City CA). Using cDNAs prepared as above, RT2 Profiler PCR Array System (PAHS-0027, SuperArray Bioscience Corporation, Frederick, MD) was used to assess relative expression profiles of genes associated with p53-dependent signaling by RT-PCR reaction in ABI 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) (15).

In vivo regenerative capacity of irradiated BMSCs

Institutionally-approved animal protocol at University of Pennsylvania was used to assess in vivo bone regeneration of OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs exposed to 2.5 Gy, a sub-lethal dose to allow for transplantation of more abundant surviving cells. From 2 of 4 subjects, 2 × 106 cells attached to 40 mg of spheroidal hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP, particle size 0.5–1.0 mm, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) were transplanted into the subcutis of 4-week-old immunocompromised nude female mice (NIH-III-nu, Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) as previously described (7). Transplants were harvested at 6 and 12 weeks, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4) and decalcified in 10% EDTA/PBS (pH 8.0) before paraffin embedding. Five micron sections were stained with hematoxylin/eosin for histological evaluation and semi-quantitative analysis of hard tissues regenerated as previously described (14, 15).

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc comparisons with Holm-Sidak test using SigmaStat 3.1 statistical package (Systat Software, Inc., Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Site-dependent radiation effects on BMSCs survival and cell cycle

Clonogenic survival analysis showed disparate site and dose-dependent responsiveness of BMSCs to irradiation. The iliac crest cells (IC-MSCs) were most sensitive to radiation relative to maxilla and mandible cells (OF-MSCs) (P < 0.05). Linear quadratic modeling, and linear transformation of α and β confirmed relative sensitivity of IC-MSCs over OF-MSCs [D0 = 1.052 (iliac crest), −0.758 (maxilla) and −0.926 (mandible); ñ = 0.4345 (iliac crest), 1.321 (maxilla) and 4.673 (mandible)]. (Figures 1A – C). OF-MSCs also recovered quicker from radiation effect and proliferated faster than IC-MSCs within 48 hours of 5 Gy irradiation (Figure 1D); a dose selected based on clonogenic survival data and clinical relevance. At baseline, there were more non-irradiated IC-MSCs in G0G1 at 81.31% compared to OF-MSCs at 67.57% and 65.44% for maxilla and mandible respectively (Figure 2A, top panel) but irradiation decreased S-phase cells in all cell types with corresponding increases in G0G1 phase (Figure 2A, lower panel) suggesting radiation-induced inhibition of S-phase entry. IC-MSCs had fewest S-phase cells and sustained apparently more DNA damage than OFMSCs as shown by Comet assay (Figures 2B) but there were no remarkable apoptotic responses in any of the cells based on either flow cytometry or In-situ cell death analysis (data not shown).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Disparate site-dependent post-irradiation survival of BMSCs. A. Clonogenic radiation survival analysis showed site and dose-dependent radiobiological response of BMSCs from three skeletal sites. Maxilla and mandible BMSCs were more radio-resistant than iliac crest BMSCs (P < 0.05, triplicate experiments of n = 4 subjects). B and C. Data was fitted to linear quadratic equation, D0 was calculated from slope, while α and β were transformed using linear survival expression −ln (Surviving fraction/Dose) = α + β(Dose). [D0 = 1.052 (iliac crest), −0.758 (maxilla) and −0.926 (mandible); ñ = 0.4345 (iliac crest), 1.321 (maxilla) and 4.673 (mandible)]. D. Maxilla and mandible also recovered quicker than iliac crest BMSCs as early as 6 hours post-irradiation (** = P < 0.01).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cell cycle distribution, DNA damage and p53-related changes in irradiated BMSCs. A. Cell cycle distribution of non-irradiated and irradiated BMSCs from the three skeletal sites indicate radiation-induced G0G1 arrest based on more BMSCs accumulation in G0G1 post-irradiation. B. Representative images of the comet tails visualized by SYBR Green I staining 30 minutes post-irradiation indicate more DNA damage in iliac crest relative to maxilla and mandible BMSCs (Analysis of relative changes in tail moment of ≥ 50 cells indicate statistically significant differences between IC-MSCs and OF-MSCs, P < 0.01). C and D. Representative Western blots and p53 levels based on densitometric analysis from irradiated cells (n=4 subjects) showed disparate p53 levels based on immunoreactivity to mouse anti-human p53 antibody. E. The response to radiation based on p21Waf1/Cip1 mRNA was higher in maxilla and mandible BMSCs (n=4 subjects) post-irradiation suggesting underlying mechanisms may be downstream of p53 signaling.

Radiation-induced changes in p53 responsiveness of BMSCs

p53 level by Western blot was relatively unchanged post-irradiation irrespective of skeletal site (Figures 2C and D) but the expression of p21WAF1/Cip1, a downstream effector, increased notably in OF-MSCs (Figures 2E). Microarray gene panel included p53-dependent genes implicated in the regulation of apoptosis, growth, proliferation, differentiation and DNA repair. While several genes were strongly over-expressed in OF-MSCs only, there were a few minimally under-expressed genes in both OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs (Table 1). Moreover, some genes that inhibit p53 activity like MDM2, MDM4 and RELA (known as p65) were unchanged in irradiated IC-MSCs but disparately over-expressed in OF-MSCs (Table 1). These complex gene interactions may underlie disparate BMSC responsiveness to irradiation.

Table 1. Microarray analysis showing disparate changes in p53-related genes post-BMSCs irradiation.

Genes Over-Expressed in Irradiated BMSCs compared with Non-Irradiated Control

Cell Type Gene Symbol Gene Name Fold
Change
Group*
Maxilla / Mandible FASLG Fas ligand (TNF superfamily, member 6) 8.0 a
GML GPI anchored molecule like protein 8.4 b
IFNB1 Interferon, beta 1, fibroblast 8.6 a, b
LRDD Leucine-rich repeats and death domain containing 4.9 a
TNF Tumor necrosis factor (TNF superfamily, member 2) 6.9 a
TP73 Tumor protein p73 4.1 b
WT1 Wilms tumor 1 4.4 d
ATM Ataxia telangiectasia mutated 4.0 b
CASP2 Caspase 2 4.7 a
FOXO3 Forkhead box O3 4.3 a
HK2 Hexokinase 2 7.3 d
LRDD Leucine-rich repeats and death domain containing 16.0 a
MDM2 Mdm2, transformed 3T3 cell double minute 2 5.5 e
MDM4 Mdm4, transformed 3T3 cell double minute 4 4.5 e
PCBP4 Poly(rC) binding protein 4 9.9 a, b
RELA V-rel re ticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene homolog A 12.0 e
SESN2 Sestrin 2 13.5 a
TNFRSF10D TNF receptor superfamily, member 10d 4.3 a
Genes Under-Expressed in Irradiated BMSCs compared with Non-Irradiated Control
Cell Type Gene Symbol Gene Name Fold
Change
Group

Iliac
crest
P53AIP1 p53- regulated apoptosis inducing protein 1 0.1 a
PCAF P300/CBP-associated factor 0.2 a,b

Maxilla / Mandible BIRC5 Baculoviral IAP repeat containing 5 (survivin) 0.1 c
CCNB2 Cyclin B2 0.2 c
CDC2 Cell division cycle 2, G1 to S and G2 to M 0.2 c
PRC1 Protein regulator of cytokinesis 1 0.2 c
PTTG1 Pituitary tumor transforming 1 0.2 e
CCNB2 Cyclin B2 0.2 c
*

Groups:

a

pro-apoptotic genes

b

genes involved in cell cycle arrest

c

genes implicated in progression through cell cycle

d

anti-apoptotic genes

e

genes inhibiting p53 transcriptional activity

Bone formation by transplanted irradiated iliac crest, maxilla and mandible cells

Irradiated OF-MSCs formed more histologically observable bone than IC-MSCs in vivo. While in vivo bone regeneration by OF-MSCs was observable by 6 weeks, IC-MSCs bone regeneration was further delayed. Interestingly, the three cell types recovered by 12 weeks to form in vivo bone quantitatively similar to that regenerated by non-irradiated cells (Figures 3A and B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

In vivo bone formation by irradiated BMSCs. A. Hematoxylin/eosin-stained sections in vivo bone showed irradiated BMSCs recovered and formed appreciable bone by 12 weeks. B. Despite irradiation, 12 weeks allowed the three cell types to recover and form bone quantitatively similar to non-irradiated cells. (Histology sections representatives of BMSCs transplants from n = 4 subjects; FT = fibrous tissue; carrier = hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate).

Discussion

Unique skeletal site-specific responses of BMSCs to irradiation have not been previously reported. Using BMSC samples from four subjects, we provide new evidence of site-disparity in the response of BMSCs from different skeletal sites to gamma radiation. It is significant to further understand biological responses of bone cells to external insults like radiation and drugs based on clinical indications that osteonecrosis affects craniofacial bones disparately with variable incidence of 3–14% in head and neck cancer patients compared to 0.44% in axial/appendicular bones in gynecological cancers patients (14, 2022). Also, bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis occurs exclusively in the jaws apart from an isolated case report in the external auditory canal (22). Within the context of ORN, there are still no studies that addressed skeletal site-dependent cellular and molecular events that occur after irradiation.

Interestingly, despite the higher incidence of ORN in the jaws, we showed for the first time higher radio-resistance of OF-MSCs relative to IC-MSCs in same individuals. This suggests that OF-MSCs survived higher radiation doses and recovered quicker than IC-MSCs, a factor that may be moderating the damaging effects of irradiation in the jaws. p53 is a central element in cellular response to irradiation, and normal cells respond with a rapid but transitory accumulation of p53 protein; an essential process for cell cycle arrest at G1 checkpoint (23). Irradiated OF-MSCs and IC-MSCs demonstrated similar response by accumulating more G1-phase cells but OF-MSCs unlike IC-MSCs expressed higher p21WAF1/CIP1, a downstream effector of p53 implicated in G1 cell cycle arrest and DNA damage repair. This is consistent with the higher recovery capacity that we demonstrated in OF-MSCs and suggests the existence of repair processes that make OF-MSCs less susceptible to irradiation. When activated, p21WAF1/CIP1, acts as a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor to block cell cycle progression and support cell survival (24). Exposure of cells to ionizing radiation causes significant early accumulation of p21WAF1/CIP1 while loss of p21WAF1/CIP1 in ATM-deficient mice severely sensitized their fibroblasts to radiation (25, 26). Previously described association of increased p21WAF1/CIP1 with ability to resist radiation-induced apoptosis indicate that radio-resistance of OF-MSCs may result from higher p21WAF1/CIP1 level (27).

Irradiated BMSCs in this study apparently did not undergo apoptotic death because In-situ apoptotic assay was negative and we have found no significant changes in BAX expression (data not shown), the death promoting gene that serves as a p53-dependent apoptotic target (28). Hence, BMSC-susceptibility to radiation appears to be by cell cycle arrest similar to earlier report that p53 response in untransformed cells usually leads to cell cycle arrest rather than apoptosis (5). This cell-to-cell variability has been described in other studies that showed fibroblasts undergo cell cycle arrest in response to radiation whereas T cells undergo extensive apoptosis (29, 30). Although microarray analysis showed more significant increase in expression of other pro-apoptotic genes (31) in OF-MSCs (Table 1), the relative OF-MSC radio-resistance to radiation-related apoptosis may be enhanced by over expression of counter players like HK2 (32) and WT1 (Table 1) that inhibit p53-dependent apoptotic pathway (33). Additionally, radio-resistance of OF-MSCs may be further enhanced by over-expression of MDM2, MDM4 and RELA genes that mutually repress p53 (34). However, the role of each of these p53-related genes needs further clarification.

In vitro radio-resistance of OF-MSCs relative to IC-MSCs was further confirmed by in vivo bone regenerative capacity post-irradiation. OF-MSCs formed in vivo bone early at 6 weeks while bone formation by irradiated IC-MSCs was further delayed (Figure 3) confirming better OF-MSC post-radiation recovery and superior osteogenic differentiation. Interestingly, IC-MSCs needed more recovery time (12 weeks) to regenerate equally appreciable bone in vivo. This pattern of higher in vivo osteogenic property of OF-MSCs that has been previously described in non-irradiated BMSCs (7) was maintained despite exposure to irradiation. Also, the three cell types post-irradiation, displayed appreciable in vivo osteogenic regenerative capacity similar to non-irradiated cells when given more recovery time of 12 weeks.

While age affects phenotypic and functional characteristics of human hematopoietic and bone marrow stromal progenitor cells (35), age effects were minimized in this study because the tissue samples were obtained from teenagers within a narrow age range. Our study also support previous reports using BMSCs from 4 individuals (7, 14, 15) to provide additional evidence of skeletal-site specificity of BMSCs as well as site-disparity in survival and recovery of irradiated BMSCs obtained from oral and hip bones. Further elucidation of underlying mechanism is still needed, but this impressive radio-resistance of OF-MSCs may have a modulating effect on ORN severity. Also, recovery capacity of irradiated OF-MSCs may make it easier for osseointegration at donor-recipient interface of osteoradionecrotic lesions treated with autologous bone grafts.

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Kelly Jordan-Sciutto, Cagla Akay and Carolyn Gibson for their useful comments and Drs. Amit Maity and George Cerniglia for assistance with survival curve analysis. This project was supported in part with funds from University of Pennsylvania Research Foundation, USPHS/NCI/NIH grant 5K08CA120875-03 and support of Penn Center for Musculoskeletal Disorders funded by NIH/NIAMS research grant AR050950.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Cronje FJ. A review of the Marx protocols: prevention and management of osteoradionecrosis by combining surgery and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Sadj. 1998;53(10):469–471. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gal TJ, Munoz-Antonia T, Muro-Cacho CA, Klotch DW. Radiation effects on osteoblasts in vitro: a potential role in osteoradionecrosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(9):1124–1128. doi: 10.1001/archotol.126.9.1124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Szymczyk KH, Shapiro IM, Adams CS. Ionizing radiation sensitizes bone cells to apoptosis. Bone. 2004;34(1):148–156. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bates S, Hickman ES, Vousden KH. Reversal of p53-induced cell-cycle arrest. Mol Carcinog. 1999;24(1):7–14. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2744(199901)24:1<7::aid-mc2>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bates S, Vousden KH. Mechanisms of p53-mediated apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1999;55(1):28–37. doi: 10.1007/s000180050267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Waldman T, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Uncoupling of S phase and mitosis induced by anticancer agents in cells lacking p21. Nature. 1996;381(6584):713–716. doi: 10.1038/381713a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Akintoye SO, Lam T, Shi S, Brahim J, Collins MT, Robey PG. Skeletal site-specific characterization of orofacial and iliac crest human bone marrow stromal cells in same individuals. Bone. 2006;38(6):758–768. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chaudhry MA. Biomarkers for human radiation exposure. J Biomed Sci. 2008;15(5):557–563. doi: 10.1007/s11373-008-9253-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Migliorati CA, Schubert MM, Peterson DE, Seneda LM. Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of mandibular and maxillary bone: an emerging oral complication of supportive cancer therapy. Cancer. 2005;104(1):83–93. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Li J, Kwong DL, Chan GC. The effects of various irradiation doses on the growth and differentiation of marrow-derived human mesenchymal stromal cells. Pediatr Transplant. 2007;11(4):379–387. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00663.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cerniglia GJ, Pore N, Tsai JH, Schultz S, Mick R, Choe R, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition modulates the microenvironment by vascular normalization to improve chemotherapy and radiotherapy efficacy. PLoS One. 2009;4(8):e6539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Iliakis G, Metzger L, Muschel RJ, McKenna WG. Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks in radiation-resistant cells obtained by transformation of primary rat embryo cells with the oncogenes H-ras and v-myc. Cancer Res. 1990;50(20):6575–6579. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McKenna WG, Weiss MC, Endlich B, Ling CC, Bakanauskas VJ, Kelsten ML, et al. Synergistic effect of the v-myc oncogene with H-ras on radioresistance. Cancer Res. 1990;50(1):97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stefanik D, Sarin J, Lam T, Levin L, Leboy PS, Akintoye SO. Disparate osteogenic response of mandible and iliac crest bone marrow stromal cells to pamidronate. Oral Dis. 2008;14(5):465–471. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01402.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yu V, Damek-Poprawa M, Nicoll SB, Akintoye SO. Dynamic hydrostatic pressure promotes differentiation of human dental pulp stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.06.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Delia D, Goi K, Mizutani S, Yamada T, Aiello A, Fontanella E, et al. Dissociation between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis can occur in Li-Fraumeni cells heterozygous for p53 gene mutations. Oncogene. 1997;14(18):2137–2147. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nigam M, Ranjan V, Srivastava S, Sharma R, Balapure AK. Centchroman induces G0/G1 arrest and caspase-dependent apoptosis involving mitochondrial membrane depolarization in MCF-7 and MDA MB-231 human breast cancer cells. Life Sci. 2008;82(11–12):577–590. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Negoescu A, Lorimier P, Labat-Moleur F, Drouet C, Robert C, Guillermet C, et al. In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement and evaluation on cell preparations. J Histochem Cytochem. 1996;44(9):959–968. doi: 10.1177/44.9.8773561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Akintoye SO, Dasso M, Hay DI, Ganeshkumar N, Spielman AI. Partial characterization of a human submandibular/sublingual salivary adhesion-promoting protein. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47(5):337–345. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9969(02)00020-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Feltl D, Vosmik M, Jirasek M, Stahalova V, Kubes J. Symptomatic osteoradionecrosis of pelvic bones in patients with gynecological malignancies-result of a long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16(2):478–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Morrish RB, Jr, Chan E, Silverman S, Jr, Meyer J, Fu KK, Greenspan D. Osteonecrosis in patients irradiated for head and neck carcinoma. Cancer. 1981;47(8):1980–1983. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19810415)47:8<1980::aid-cncr2820470813>3.0.co;2-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sarin J, DeRossi SS, Akintoye SO. Updates on bisphosphonates and potential pathobiology of bisphosphonate-induced jaw osteonecrosis. Oral Dis. 2008;14(3):277–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Valerie K, Yacoub A, Hagan MP, Curiel DT, Fisher PB, Grant S, et al. Radiation-induced cell signaling: inside-out and outside-in. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6(3):789–801. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Harper JW, Adami GR, Wei N, Keyomarsi K, Elledge SJ. The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell. 1993;75(4):805–816. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90499-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hill R, Bodzak E, Blough MD, Lee PW. p53 Binding to the p21 promoter is dependent on the nature of DNA damage. Cell Cycle. 2008;7(16):2535–2543. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.16.6440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wang YA, Elson A, Leder P. Loss of p21 increases sensitivity to ionizing radiation and delays the onset of lymphoma in atm-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(26):14590–14595. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Waldman T, Zhang Y, Dillehay L, Yu J, Kinzler K, Vogelstein B, et al. Cell-cycle arrest versus cell death in cancer therapy. Nat Med. 1997;3(9):1034–1036. doi: 10.1038/nm0997-1034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Miyashita T, Reed JC. Tumor suppressor p53 is a direct transcriptional activator of the human bax gene. Cell. 1995;80(2):293–299. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90412-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Clarke AR, Purdie CA, Harrison DJ, Morris RG, Bird CC, Hooper ML, et al. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by p53-dependent and independent pathways. Nature. 1993;362(6423):849–852. doi: 10.1038/362849a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Di Leonardo A, Linke SP, Clarkin K, Wahl GM. DNA damage triggers a prolonged p53-dependent G1 arrest and long-term induction of Cip1 in normal human fibroblasts. Genes Dev. 1994;8(21):2540–2551. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.21.2540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Yang JY, Xia W, Hu MC. Ionizing radiation activates expression of FOXO3a, Fas ligand, and Bim, and induces cell apoptosis. Int J Oncol. 2006;29(3):643–648. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Budanov AV, Shoshani T, Faerman A, Zelin E, Kamer I, Kalinski H, et al. Identification of a novel stress-responsive gene Hi95 involved in regulation of cell viability. Oncogene. 2002;21(39):6017–6031. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maheswaran S, Englert C, Bennett P, Heinrich G, Haber DA. The WT1 gene product stabilizes p53 and inhibits p53-mediated apoptosis. Genes Dev. 1995;9(17):2143–2156. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.17.2143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wadgaonkar R, Collins T. Murine double minute (MDM2) blocks p53-coactivator interaction, a new mechanism for inhibition of p53-dependent gene expression. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(20):13760–13767. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.20.13760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wagner W, Bork S, Horn P, Krunic D, Walenda T, Diehlmann A, et al. Aging and replicative senescence have related effects on human stem and progenitor cells. PLoS One. 2009;4(6):e5846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES