Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Synlett. 2009 May;8(2009):1189–1207. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1216654

Table 1.

Comparison of two different catalyst scaffolds. graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0002.jpg

Entry Substrate Product Catalyst Yield % ee%
graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0003.jpg graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0004.jpg 33 80 90 (R)
1 34 94 94 (R)
2 40 94 90 (S)
41 95 92 (S)
3 graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0005.jpg graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0006.jpg 34 90 84 (R)
4 40 94 80 (S)
5 graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0007.jpg graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0008.jpg 34 50 81 (R)
6 40 85 68 (S)
7 graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0009.jpg graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0010.jpg 34 35 94 (S)
8 40 90 92 (R)
9 graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0011.jpg graphic file with name nihms-199310-t0012.jpg 34 80 81 (S)
10 40 81 95 (R)