Skip to main content
Annals of Botany logoLink to Annals of Botany
. 2010 May 24;106(1):157–171. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq095

The base number of ‘loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium species and its implication for cytoevolution in Aspleniaceae

Elke Bellefroid 1, S Khadijah Rambe 2, Olivier Leroux 1, Ronald L L Viane 1,*
PMCID: PMC2889803  PMID: 20498038

Abstract

Background and Aims

‘Loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium species are morphologically a remarkably distinct group of Aspleniaceae. Except for two preliminary chromosome counts of Asplenium theciferum, the cytology of this group of species has, however, been largely unstudied.

Methods

Chromosome counts were obtained by acetocarmine squash preparations of one mitotic cell and several meiotic cells. Relative DNA content of gametophytic and sporophytic cells was determined by flow cytometry. The phylogenetic placement of A. loxoscaphoides, A. rutifolium s.l. and A. theciferum s.l. was investigated through an analysis of rbcL sequences.

Key Results

The dysploid base number is reported to be x = 35 in Asplenium centrafricanum, A. loxoscaphoides, A. sertularioides and A. theciferum. Analysis of rbcL sequences confirms that ‘loxoscaphoids’ nest robustly within Asplenium. Several high ploidy levels exceeding the tetraploid level were found in A. theciferum s.l. and A. rutifolium s.l. All taxa proved to be sexual.

Conclusions

Four base numbers are known at present for Aspleniaceae: x = 39, 38, 36 and 35. The dysploid base number x = 35 found in the ‘loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium spp. sheds a novel light on the cytoevolution of the whole family. We postulate a recurrent descending dysploid evolution within Aspleniaceae, leading to speciation at the (sub)generic and species/group level.

Keywords: Dysploidy, cytology, cytoevolution, Aspleniaceae, Asplenium centrafricanum, Asplenium loxoscaphoides, Asplenium rutifolium, Asplenium sertularioides, Asplenium theciferum, polyploidization, chromosome base number, aneuploidy

INTRODUCTION

The cosmopolitan Aspleniaceae are one of the largest and most species-rich families of leptosporangiate ferns and contain approx. 800 terrestrial, epilithic or epiphytic ferns (Kramer and Viane, 1990). Since 1950, many studies have focused on the cytology, taxonomy, biosystematics and phylogenetics of certain groups of Aspleniaceae (e.g. Manton, 1950, 1959; Wagner, 1952, 1954; Lovis and Lovis, 1955; Lovis, 1964, 1973, 1977; Tardieu-Blot, 1956a, b, 1957; Meyer, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961; Bir, 1960, 1962, 1963; Vida, 1963; Sledge, 1965; Morton and Lellinger, 1966; Sleep, 1966, 1983; Braithwaite, 1972, 1986; Löve and Löve, 1973; Reichstein et al., 1973; Holttum, 1974; Iwatsuki, 1975; Brownsey, 1976a, b; Bouharmont, 1977; Lovis et al., 1977; Viane and Van Cotthem, 1977, 1979; Reichstein, 1981, 1984; Salvo et al., 1982; Ching and Wu, 1984, 1985; Bir et al., 1985; Werth et al., 1985a, b; Mitui et al., 1989; Wu, 1989a, b; Murakami and Moran, 1993; Murakami, 1995; Cheng and Murakami, 1998; Murakami et al., 1998, 1999; Vogel et al., 1996, 1998ac, 1999a, b; Gastony and Johnson, 2001; Herrero et al., 2001; Pinter et al., 2002; Van den heede et al., 2002, 2003, 2004; Van den heede and Viane, 2002; Trewick et al., 2002; Sylvestre and Windisch, 2003; Van den heede, 2003; Viane and Reichstein, 2003; Schneider et al., 2004; Chaerle, 2005; Perrie and Brownsey, 2005a, b; Schneider et al, 2005) resulting in the present generic delimitation of the family into two genera: Asplenium with >700 species and Hymenasplenium with >30 species. According to micromorphological studies (Viane and Van Cotthem, 1977, 1979; Viane, 1992) and recent molecular data (Murakami et al., 1999; Gastony and Johnson, 2001; Pinter et al., 2002; Trewick et al., 2002; Van den heede et al., 2003; Schneider et al., 2004; Smith et al., 2006), the generic segregates Camptosorus, Ceterach, Ceterachopsis, Diellia, Loxoscaphe, Phyllitis, Pleurosorus and Thamnopteris clearly nest within Asplenium s.l., but with regard to the recognition of natural infrageneric groups (subgenera or sections), Asplenium is still poorly understood (Kramer and Viane, 1990). Besides molecular techniques and breeding experiments, cytological studies still have a major importance when studying the phylogenetics of this genus that is well known for its reticulate evolution resulting from hybridization and polyploidization (Wagner, 1953; Lovis, 1973, 1977).

Knowledge of fern cytology and chromosome base numbers has rapidly increased since the publication of Irene Manton's book Problems of cytology and evolution in the Pteridophyta in 1950. In this work, the first accurate chromosome counts for 11 European and four Macaronesian Asplenium species were published, all of which pointed towards a base number of x = 36 (Manton, 1950). Four years later Manton and Sledge (1954) presented the first chromosome numbers for a tropical Hymenasplenium species, counting n = 80 and 2n = approx. 158 in H. unilaterale s.l. from Sri Lanka. Many comparable chromosome numbers for H. unilaterale and related species were reported later for India, Japan and China (cited in Cheng and Murakami, 1998). Until 1989 the basic chromosome numbers for Hymenasplenium were considered to be x = 40 and x = 36. However, in 1989 Mitui et al. (1989) showed that the basic chromosome number in eight Japanese Hymenasplenium species was x = 39, with one exception of x = 38 in H. subnormale. The count of x = 40 for H. unilaterale has not been confirmed in later studies, whereas the base number x = 36 for Asplenium is supported by practically all cytological research on Asplenium since 1950.

The five Asplenium species examined were from Ethiopia, Kenya, Réunion, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Venezuela and Zimbabwe: Asplenium centrafricanum Pic. Serm., A. loxoscaphoides Baker, A. rutifolium Kunze, A. sertularioides Baker and A. theciferum (Kunth) Mett. All species are characterized by short and submarginal sori, with the indusium fused with the lamina at its lateral ends to form a pouch-like structure, and a subcoriaceous and more or less reduced lamina (Fig. 1). These five species are mainly distributed in the Afro-montane regions, except for A. theciferum which also occurs in mountainous regions of Central and South America. Because the group includes A. theciferum, the type of Loxoscaphe T. Moore, the term ‘loxoscaphoid’ is used for these five taxa. Loxoscaphe in a purely descriptive sense is characterized by the presence of short and cup-shaped sori with the appearance of a Davallia sorus. The type, A. theciferum, was firstly described in the genus Davallia (as Davallia thecifera Kunth), and the presence of cup-shaped or ‘davallioid’ sori, has historically been interpreted as a primitive character for Asplenium and an intermediate state between Asplenium and Davallia (Holttum, 1966). We prefer to use the term ‘loxoscaphoid’ for all taxa related to A. theciferum, instead of other more confusing or less well-defined circumscriptions such as ‘caenopteroid’, derived from Caenopteris (Bergius, 1786) and lectotypified (Copeland, 1947) by A. rutifolium or ‘dareoid’ from Darea (de Jussieu, 1789). Both are based on superficial characters such as finely dissected fronds, reaching their extreme when each ultimate segment encloses only a single vein, bearing a single sorus with the lateral sides of the indusium sometimes fused to the lamina and occasionally forming a pouch-like structure (Copeland, 1947).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

‘Loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium: abaxial view of fronds: (A) Asplenium centrafricanum (4x, Uganda); (B) A. loxoscaphoides (4x, Kenya); (C) A. rutifolium (8x, Zimbabwe); (D) A. theciferum (8x, Venezuela); (E) A. sertularioides (4x, Uganda). Scale bars = 20 mm.

Asplenium theciferum was examined cytologically by Manton and Sledge (1954) and Gomez-Pignataro (1971), but these authors did not report exact or documented chromosome numbers. Asplenium centrafricanum, A. loxoscaphoides, A. rutifolium and A. sertularioides have never been studied cytologically.

The objective of this study was to clarify the cytological nature of the five ‘loxoscaphoids’ mentioned above. The chromosome numbers were identified through chromosome counts of meiotic spore mother cells and one mitotic sporangial stalk cell. Correlation of the chromosome counts with flow cytometric analysis revealed the ploidy. The reproductive nature of the species examined was investigated by growing gametophytes from spores and analysing their ploidy using flow cytometry. Three ‘loxoscaphoids’ were included in the present rbcL analysis: A. loxoscaphoides, A. rutifolium and A. theciferum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Origin of plants used in this study

Sporophytes

All material for the meiotic and mitotic chromosome counts and flow cytometry was collected during field trips by Bellefroid and Viane to Ethiopia (1998), Kenya (2006), Réunion (1999), South Africa (1997 and 2007), Tanzania (1998), Uganda (2007), Venezuela (2005) and Zimbabwe (2005). Some samples were collected from plants in the field, but others were collected later from living plants cultivated in the Ghent Botanical Garden. The field localities, specimen identifications and voucher numbers are listed in Appendix 1. The localities, specimen identifications and voucher numbers of material used for the molecular analysis are listed in Appendix 2. An overview is listed in Table 1. Herbarium vouchers of all specimens examined are deposited in the Ghent University Herbarium (GENT).

Table 1.

Chromosome number, ploidy, locality and voucher of cytologically and molecularly examined specimens

Species Chromosome number (counted) Ploidy level (flow cytometry) Molecular analysis (X) Voucher Origin
A. centrafricanum n = 70II 4x EB392 Uganda
A. centrafricanum n = 70II 4x EB393 Uganda
A. centrafricanum 4x EB396 Uganda
A. centrafricanum 4x RV11236 Uganda
A. centrafricanum 4x RV11237 Uganda
A. centrafricanum 4x RV11246 Uganda
A. loxoscaphoides n = 70II 4x EB324 Kenya
A. loxoscaphoides 4x X EB325 Kenya
A. loxoscaphoides n = 70II 4x EB337 Kenya
A. loxoscaphoides 4x X EB339 Kenya
A. loxoscaphoides 4x X RV7548 Tanzania
A. loxoscaphoides n = 70II 4x X RV7549 Tanzania
A. rutifolium 4x X RV6377C South Africa
A. rutifolium n = approx. 70II 4x RV11549 South Africa
A. rutifolium 4x RV11561 South Africa
A. rutifolium 8x RV8300 Réunion
A. rutifolium 8x X RV8301 Réunion
A. rutifolium 8x RV8302 Réunion
A. rutifolium 8x X RV8730 Zimbabwe
A. rutifolium 8x X EB240 Zimbabwe
A. rutifolium 8x EB256 Zimbabwe
A. sertularioides 4x EB348 Uganda
A. sertularioides n = 70II 4x EB353 Uganda
A. sertularioides n = 70II 4x EB358 Uganda
A. sertularioides n = 70II 4x EB360 Uganda
A. sertularioides n = 70II 4x EB373 Uganda
A. sertularioides 4x EB383 Uganda
A. sertularioides n = 70II 4x EB408 Uganda
A. sertularioides 2n = 140 4x EB408 Uganda
A. sertularioides 4x RV11131 Uganda
A. sertularioides 4x RV11156 Uganda
A. theciferum n = 70II 4x EB306 Kenya
A. theciferum n = 70II 4x X EB308 Kenya
A. theciferum n = 70II 4x EB342 Uganda
A. theciferum n = 70II 4x EB388 Uganda
A. theciferum n = 70II 4x RV7219 Ethiopia
A. theciferum 4x X RV7541 Tanzania
A. theciferum 8x EB404 Uganda
A. theciferum 8x EB407 Uganda
A. theciferum 8x X RV10140 Venezuela
A. theciferum 8x RV10141 Venezuela
A. theciferum 8x X RV10336 Venezuela
A. theciferum n = approx. 210II 12x X EB238 Zimbabwe
A. theciferum 12x X EB244 Zimbabwe
A. theciferum 12x EB248 Zimbabwe
A. theciferum 12x EB395 Uganda
A. theciferum n = approx. 210II 12x EB401 Uganda
A. theciferum 12x RV11234 Uganda
A. theciferum 12x RV11488 South Africa
A. theciferum 12x RV11494 South Africa
A. theciferum 12x RV11500 South Africa

Gametophytes

Spores were collected from plants cultivated in the Ghent Botanical Garden and were sown on agar-solidified medium containing a nutrient solution recommended by Dyer (1979). The cultures were maintained under natural light, without direct sunlight, at room temperature. When the gametophytes were approx. 5 months old, prior to the formation of antheridia and archegonia, they were harvested and thoroughly washed with distilled water.

Cytology

For chromosome counts of meiotic cells, immature sporangia were collected in the field or in the greenhouses of Ghent Botanical Garden (Table 1). The material was treated with 8-hydroxyquinolinine for 3 h at room temperature and then fixed in freshly prepared, ice cold 3 : 1 absolute ethanol : glacial acetic acid. The material was stored at –20 °C until studied. The meiotic spore mother cells were observed at metaphase I.

For the chromosome counts of mitotic cells, sori with young sporangia were treated in a similar way. The mitotic stalk cells of the young sporangia were then studied at metaphase. Several efforts were made to use gametophytic cells for mitotic chromosome counts, but all attempts failed.

Acetocarmine squash preparations were made as described by Heitz (1925) and Manton (1950). Photographs were taken with an Olympus BH2 phase-contrast microscope equipped with a Canon EOS 10D digital camera. Permanent preparations were made by dehydrating the cover slip and slide in graded mixtures of acetic acid and absolute ethanol, followed by mounting in Euparal (3C 239; Chroma-Gesellschaft, Köngen, Germany). All permanent preparations are kept in the Research Group of Pteridology of the Department of Biology at Ghent University. For the production of analytical diagrams, enlarged prints were used for interpretation and drawing at a magnification of ×1500. Drawings of the best cells were digitized using Corel Draw 12.

Flow cytometry

To quantify the relative DNA content of the specimens examined, flow cytometric analyses were conducted on both gametophytic and sporophytic material. For each species, the sporophytic specimens with accurate chromosome counts were used as standards to deduce the ploidy of the remaining sporophytes by correlating their relative DNA content. Similarly, the counted sporophytic specimens of each species were used as standards to deduce the ploidy of the corresponding gametophytes. The combination of flow cytometric analyses and chomosome counts allowed the ploidy of a large number of specimens to be determined from different populations (Table 1).

For flow cytometric analysis of sporophytes fresh petiole samples were used. Whole gametophytes were also prepared for analysis. The samples were individually chopped using a sharp razor blade in a glass Petri dish containing nucleus isolation buffer [2·1 % (w/v) citric acid monohydrate, 0·5 % (w/v) Tween 20, distilled water] and filtered through a 50-μm nylon mesh. The nuclei suspension was supplemented with DAPI reagent [6·5 % NaH2PO4.2H2O, 40 µL DAPI stock solution (5 mg DAPI/mL distilled water), distilled water], amount 1 : 4 nucleus isolation buffer : DAPI reagent. The samples were analysed using a flow cytometer (Partec PA-1; Partec, GmbH, Munster, Germany), following the supplier's instructions. To calculate the relative nuclear DNA content, Agave stricta (2x, 2n = 60, 2C = 7·8 pg; Zonneveld et al., 2005) was used as an internal standard in most cases. Agave sisalana (5x, 2n = 150, 2C = 20·2pg; Zonneveld et al., 2005) was used when the relative nuclear DNA content of the gametophyte coincided with that of Agave stricta.

Molecular analysis

Thirty-eight taxa of Aspleniaceae from various locations (Appendix 2) were sampled. Two Hymenasplenium spp. were used as the out-group. Total genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN), following the manufacturer's instructions or using the CTAB DNA extraction protocol (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). A partial region of the rbcL was amplified with primer 5′-ATGTCACCACAAACAGAGACTAAAGC-3′ and 5′-GCAGCAGCTAGTTCCGGGCTCCA-3′ (Hasebe et al., 1994). PCR reagents were prepared according to the instructions of i-TagTM DNA polymerase PCR kit by iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc. PCR amplifications were carried out on a PTC-100TM thermocycler (MJ Research, Inc.). Cycling parameters were fitted accordingly to the PCR kit manufacturer's recommendations for rbcL: initial denaturation of 120 s at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 20 s denaturation at 94 °C, 20 s annealing at 57 °C, 105 s extension at 72 °C and a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were cleaned using MEGAquick-spinTM kit by iNtRON Biotechnology, Inc. Both strands of each gene were sequenced by Macrogen, Inc., South Korea, and assembled using Sequence Manipulation Suite (Stothard, 2000); rbcL sequences of 1209 bp were aligned using ClustalX (Thompson et al., 1997). The best evolution model for maximum likelihood was tested using modeltest 3·06 (Posada and Crandall, 2001). Maximum likelihood analysis was performed using GARLI v0·942 (Zwickl, 2006a, b). The consensus tree of 1000 bootstrap replicates was obtained using PAUP 4·0 (Swofford, 2002).

RESULTS

Chromosome counts and flow cytometry

For various reasons, observing meiotic stages in the species examined was difficult. Loxoscaphoid sori are small and enclose relatively few sporangia, resulting in a limited number of potentially meiotic cells. All stages of sporangial development coexist in a single sorus, indicating that the ripening of sporangia and spores extends over a long period of time. Therefore the chance of finding sporangia with meiotic spore mother cells is rather small. Moreover, meiosis seems to take place early in sporangial development when the sporangia are still extremely small, and the spores rapidly develop an exospore wall within the immature sporangia. It is almost impossible to produce cytological preparations with meiotic stages, without the presence of spores. The relatively rigid exospore walls hinder proper squashing, essential for obtaining good chromosome spreads. Moreover, the chromosomes of A. centrafricanum and of A. sertularioides, in particular, have relatively long arms, frequently overlapping each other during metaphase I.

Observation of dividing mitotic cells in metaphase was even more problematic than observing dividing meiotic cells. The first reason is merely due to the large number of chromosomes (2n = 140) in mitotic sporophytic cells, which makes good and satisfactory chromosome spreading difficult. Only for A. sertularioides was an accurate mitotic chromosome count obtained. To overcome the problem of the large number of chromosomes, an attempt was made to count chromosomes in gametophytic mitotic cells, since flow cytometric analysis confirmed that gametophytes possess only half the DNA content of their corresponding sporophyte. Unfortunately these attempts failed, partly due to the low mitotic activity in the gametophytes.

In all cytological preparations, a mixture of metacentric, submetacentric and acrocentric chromosomes and a broad range of variation in chromosome size were observed. For specimens of A. rutifolium and A. theciferum with a ploidy exceeding 4x, meiosis and sporogenesis were occasionally irregular. Some meiotic spore mother cells showed irregular pairing of chromosomes, with the formation of univalents, bivalents, clumped bivalents or multivalents and chomosome threads and/or bridges. As a result, anaphase I was often extremely disturbed, showing numerous lagging chromosomes. However, this phenomenon was not constant for all spore mother cells in a given sporangium. In a later stage of meiosis, irregular lobing or budding and splitting of the haploid daughter nuclei leading to abortion of spores in pairs, was sporadically observed. Further research is needed to examine the nature of the clumped bivalents in metaphase I, in order to determine whether these represent true multivalents. The hypothetical ability of these taxa of high ploidy to form multivalents during metaphase I would indicate their possible autopolyploid origins, although allopolyploidy cannot be ruled out at this stage. The majority of sporangia contained 16 spore mother cells and subsequently 64 spores. Occasionally, sporangia with only 32 spores, which were not always significantly larger or morphologically different from spores produced in normal sporangia, were observed.

Because various irregularities were observed during meiosis and sporogenesis in A. rutifolium and A. theciferum, the reproductive nature of all five examined species was examined by growing gametophytes from spores and analysing their ploidy using flow cytometry. The gametophytes of all examined species analysed, across different ploidies had only half the relative DNA content found in the corresponding sporophytes from which the spores were collected. This implies that normal meiosis took place prior to sporogenesis. As a consequence we assume these taxa to have a sexual reproduction, since apogamously reproducing taxa would form gametophytes with the same DNA content as the corresponding sporophytes. However, the possibility of the occasional formation of viable diplospores that could possibly germinate to form gametophytes with the same DNA content as the corresponding sporophyte cannot be ruled out, especially given the observation of occasionally 32-spored sporangia.

Asplenium sertularioides

Meiotic metaphase I cells of A. sertularioides had n = 70 bivalents (Fig. 2A, B). The mitotic metaphase cell of A. sertularioides (Fig. 2C, D) had 2n = 140. All counted specimens proved to be tetraploid (4x) with a chromosome number based on x = 35 (Table 1). The counted specimens were used as standards to calculate the ploidy of the remaining specimens by flow cytometry. All collected specimens possesed the same ploidy (Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Cytological preparations of Asplenium sertularioides (EB408): (A, B) meiosis with n = 70 bivalents; (C, D) mitosis with 2n = 140 chromosomes; (A, C) photographs; (B, D) analytical drawings. Scale bars = 10 µm.

Asplenium centrafricanum

Meiotic metaphase I cells of A. centrafricanum had n = 70 bivalents (Fig. 3A, B). Counted specimens all proved to be tetraploid (4x) with a chromosome number based on x = 35 (Table 1). The counted specimens were used as standards to calculate the ploidy of the other specimens by flow cytometry. All collected specimens possesed the same ploidy (Table 1).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cytological preparations of Asplenium centrafricanum, A. loxoscaphoides and A. theciferum: (A, B) Asplenium centrafricanum (EB392), meiosis with n = 70 bivalents; (C, D) Asplenium loxoscaphoides (RV7549), meiosis with n = 70 bivalents; (E, F) Asplenium theciferum (RV7219), meiosis with n = 70 bivalents (an enlargement of the central part of cell is shown in F); (A, C, E) photographs; (B, D, F) analytical drawings. Scale bars = 10 µm.

Asplenium loxoscaphoides

Meiotic metaphase I cells of A. loxoscaphoides had n = 70 bivalents (Fig. 3C, D). Counted specimens all proved to be tetraploid (4x) with a chromosome number based on x = 35 (Table 1). Counted specimens were used as standards to calculate the ploidy of the other specimens by flow cytometry. All collected specimens had the same ploidy (Table 1).

Asplenium theciferum

Specimens from Kenya and Ethiopia and some from Uganda had n = 70 bivalents at metaphase I (Fig. 3E, F). Specimens from Zimbabwe and some from Uganda showed n = approx. 210 bivalents at metaphase I (Table 1). Both cytotypes have a chromosome number based on x = 35. Counted specimens were used as standards to determine the ploidy of other specimens by flow cytometry. Thus tetraploids (4x) were discovered in Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, octoploids (8x) in Uganda and Venezuela and dodecaploids (12x) in South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe (Table 1).

Asplenium rutifolium

Asplenium rutifolium proved to be extremely difficult to examine cytologically, and no exact chromosome counts were obtained. Based on an approximate counting (one specimen from South Africa with n = approx. 70 bivalents) and correlation with flow cytometric analyses, putative tetraploids (4x) for South Africa and putative octoploids (8x) for Réunion and Zimbabwe are reported (Table 1).

Molecular analysis

In the rbcL analysis (Fig. 4), three ‘loxoscaphoids’, A. loxoscaphoides, A. rutifolium s.l. and A. theciferum s.l., were included. In contrast to other recent molecular analyses of ‘loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium taxa (Murakami, 1995; Gastony and Johnson, 2001; Schneider et al., 2004) only ‘loxoscaphoid’ samples of known ploidy were added, and these were collected over a wide geographical range (Appendix 2).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Consensus rbcL-tree for 38 members of Aspleniaceae, including samples of three ‘loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium taxa, constructed using maximum likelihood, with bootstrap values >70 % from a 1000-replicate analysis.

The phylogenetic tree, constructed on the basis of rbcL sequences using maximum likelihood reveals a ‘loxoscaphoid’ clade [A. loxoscaphoides (EB325, EB339, RV7548 and RV7549), A. rutifolium (EB240, RV6377C, RV8301 and RV8730) and A. theciferum (EB238, EB244, EB308, RV7541, RV10140 and RV10336)], robustly nested within Asplenium. The nearest sister groups to this clade are the ‘A. sandersoniiA. daucifolium’ group, the ‘A. thunbergiiA. tenerum’ group and the ‘A. phyllitidis–A. nidus’ group.

The placement of A. rutifolium with A. theciferum and A. loxoscaphoides is consistent with their morphological similarity. Within A. theciferum, tetraploid (EB308 and RV7541) and dodecaploid (EB238 and EB244) specimens from Africa and octoploids (RV10140 and RV10336) from Venezuela strongly group together. The tetraploid (RV6377C) and octoploid (EB240, RV8301, RV8730) A. rutifolium specimens also strongly group together.

DISCUSSION

Recurrent descending dysploid evolution in Aspleniaceae

In this paper, new chromosome numbers, based on x = 35, are presented for A. centrafricanum, A. loxoscaphoides and A. sertularioides, and the provisional counts for A. theciferum of Manton and Sledge (1954) (specimen from Kenya, n = 70–72) and Gomez-Pignataro (1971) (specimen from Costa Rica, n = 70) confirmed. Hence, the present findings corroborate the establishment of a ‘new’ base number (x = 35 within Asplenium. In addition, the molecular phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4) shows that the ‘loxoscaphoid’ clade (A. loxoscaphoides, A. rutifolium and A. theciferum) with the base number x = 35 robustly nests within Asplenium. This phylogenetic placement is in concordance with previous micromorphological (Viane and Van Cotthem, 1977; Viane, 1992), taxonomic (Kramer and Viane, 1990) and molecular analyses (Murakami, 1995; Gastony and Johnson, 2001; Schneider et al., 2004). Although it was not possible to obtain an exact chromosome count for A. rutifolium, its macro- and micromorphology and phylogenetic placement in the molecular analysis (Fig. 4) indicate that this species is closely related to A. loxoscaphoides and A. theciferum. Therefore, we also postulate a chromosome number based on x = 35 for A. rutifolium. Biogeographical, morphological (data not shown) and cytological data suggest that A. centrafricanum and A. sertularioides are closely related to A. loxoscaphoides, A. rutifolium and A. theciferum, and belong to the ‘loxoscaphoid’ clade, which thus contains at least these five species. The cytologically examined taxa of the three nearest groups (‘A. sandersoniiA. daucifolium’ group, ‘A. thunbergiiA. tenerum’ group and ‘A. phyllitidis–A. nidus’ group) to the ‘loxoscaphoid’ clade are tetraploids and have chromosome numbers based on x = 36 [see Manton and Sledge (1954) for A. tenerum (2n = 144); Manton (1959) for A. sandersonii (2n = 144); Bir (1960) and Abraham et al. (1962) for A. nidus (2n = 144) and A. phyllitidis (2n = 144)]. Consequently we postulate that the base number x = 35 is a dysploid derivate from an ancestor with base number x = 36.

This hypothesis is supported by the presence of heterogeneous karyotypes with acrocentric and submetacentric chromosomes and a great range of variation in chromosome size (Stebbins, 1971; Schubert, 2007). The terms ‘dysploidy’ and ‘aneuploidy’ are often used interchangeably, but denote two different processes with different consequences. The term ‘dysploidy’ is used here in the sense of Stace and James (1996) to indicate the process whereby the euchromatin of a genome is rearranged by inversions and translocations onto a greater or lesser number of centromeres. ‘Aneuploidy’, on the other hand, defines the gain or loss of whole chromosomes. Chromosome number reduction through dysploidy or so-called chromosome ‘fusion’, combined with polyploidy has been suggested as an important evolutionary process in several genera of non-flowering plants (Lovis, 1977; Brownsey, 1983; Pichi Sermolli, 1987; Windham and Yatskievych, 2003) and flowering plants (Rye and James, 1992; Knox and Kowal, 1993; Stace et al., 1993, 1997; Stace and James, 1996; Schneeweiss et al., 2004; Lysak et al., 2006; Shan et al., 2006).

Due to morphological, anatomical, geographical, cytological and molecular affinities between the taxa examined, we may presume a single common ancestor for the ‘loxoscaphoid’ taxa treated in this study. As no diploid species with chromosome numbers based on x = 35 have been detected to date, we cannot state with certainty whether this dysploid reduction occurred at the diploid level (n = 36 to n = 35) or at the tetraploid level (n = 72 to n = 70), nor can we be certain whether this was a single or recurrent evolutionary event.

A first explanation would be chromosomal reduction at the tetraploid level. This hypothesis would be supported by the fact that the lowest ploidy of the ‘loxoscaphoids’ and their sister groups is tetraploid or higher (this study; Perrie and Brownsey, 2005,b). A major discovery of the past few decades is the extent and speed of genome reorganization in polyploids (Soltis et al., 2003). Recent studies demonstrate that polyploidy involves more than the passive fusion of two or more genomes, instead it encompasses a whole spectrum of physiological and molecular adjustments (Soltis and Soltis, 1993, 1999, 2000; Scheid et al., 1996; Leitch and Bennett, 1997, 2004; Wendel, 2000; Soltis et al., 2003, 2004; Adams and Wendel, 2005; Schubert, 2007). Levy and Feldman (2004) demonstrated that extensive genomic rearrangements often arise with the onset of allopolyploidization. Allopolyploidization has been shown to be a driving force in plant evolution. Furthermore, rearranged chromosomes contribute to reproductive isolation and to speciation, as a result of reduced fertility of heterozygous carriers and/or reduced gene flow caused by suppressed recombination (Werth and Windham, 1991; Lynch and Force, 2000; Rieseberg, 2001; Taylor et al., 2001). Consequently, there is a realistic possibility of a dysploid chromosome number reduction during the formation of an allopolyploid Asplenium species (Fig. 5C). This would involve the reduction of the expected tetraploid karyotype with two chromosome-pairs (n = 72II to n = 70II) in the course of the allopolyploidization event, through chromosomal reorganization. Again we cannot state whether this was a single or recurrent evolutionary event, even though many hybridization events in Aspleniaceae have been shown to be recurrent (Lovis, 1973; Werth et al., 1985a, b; Prelli et al., 1998; Vogel et al., 1998a, c, 1999a, b; Rumsey et al., 2004). Subsequent diploidization, genome downsizing, hybridization, geographic isolation and reproductive isolation might then have led to different closely related tetraploid taxa with a chromosome number based on x = 35. In this case there would have never been a diploid Asplenium species with x = 35. In our phylogenetic tree, the three ‘loxoscaphoid’ Aspleniums form a polytomy, possibly representing a sudden radiation in speciation following an allopolyploidization event.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Possible pathways in the formation of dysploid tetraploid karyotypes with base number x = 35. Regular bold characters indicate regular karyotypes based on x = 36. Italic bold characters between quotation marks indicate derived dysploid karyotypes based on x = 35; R! indicates meiosis. (A) Formation of an autotetraploid with base number x = 35 via autopolyploidization of a ‘dysploid diploid’ with x = 35, formed by dysploid chromosome number reduction in a diploid with x = 36. (B) Formation of either auto- or allotetraploids, with x = 35, after either polyploidization,or hybridization and polyploidization in or between two closely related ‘dysploid diploids’ with x = 35. (C) Formation of a ‘dysploid allotetraploid’ with base number x = 35 through hybridization of two sexual diploids with x = 36, and subsequent polyploidization and dysploid chromosome number reduction.

It should be noted that if a chromosome number reduction at the polyploid level is assumed, it is also necessary to take into account the possibility of an aneuploid chromosome number reduction. Theoretically the loss of whole chromosomes at the polyploid level is not necessarily lethal. However aneuploid chromosome number reduction in plants has never been irrefutably proven and recent studies have revealed much more complex interactions than the simple loss of whole chromosomes (Lovis, 1977; Brownsey, 1983; Pichi Sermolli, 1987; Rye and James, 1992; Knox and Kowal, 1993; Stace et al., 1993; Stace and James, 1996; Stace et al., 1997; Windham and Yatskievych, 2003; Schneeweiss et al., 2004; Lysak et al., 2006; Shan et al., 2006).

A second hypothesis, chromosomal reduction at the diploid level, would involve the elimination of only one centromere/minichromosome, followed by polyploidization (Fig. 5A). The relative differences in total genome size (data not shown) between the taxa examined might indicate the possibility of a recurrent process of chromosome number reduction and polyploidization from a single common ancestor (Leitch and Bennett, 2004). After differential processes of genome rearrangements and downsizing following the polyploidization, different species might have originated (Leitch and Bennett, 2004). Recurrent processes of descending dysploidy at the diploid level may have led to different diploids with x = 35, which may have given rise to both auto- and allopolyploids after hybridization, polyploidization, genome restructuring and downsizing, as well as geographical and subsequent reproductive isolation (Fig. 5B). However, at present no diploid species with x = 35 are known.

Aspleniaceae have long been considered to be extraordinarily uniform in cytological terms, with a base number of x = 36. Indeed, the majority of data on chromosome numbers reveal 36 bivalents or euploid derivates, suggesting x = 36 as the plesiomorphic state for Aspleniaceae. In Hymenasplenium, the only other genus currently recognized besides Asplenium, most representatives have cytotypes based on x = 39 (Mitui et al., 1989; Cheng and Murakami, 1998), although Cheng and Murakami (1998) found exceptions: H. costarisorum appears to have two cytotypes (sexual diploids and tetraploids) based on x = 36 and H. subnormale two cytotypes (sexual diploids and tetraploids) based on x = 38. Following the assumption that x = 36 is the plesiomorphic state for Aspleniaceae and therefore also in Hymenasplenium, H. costarisorum would have maintained the primitive chromosome number for this genus. This, however, is not supported by the molecular data of Murakami (1995), as the rbcL tree indicates that this species is closely related to H. obscurum with a base number x = 39. Therefore, Cheng and Murakami (1998) stated that the x = 36 of H. costarisorum cannot be a plesiomorphic state in Hymenasplenium, but possibly a result of convergent or reversal evolution from x = 39 to 36. Apart from H. costarisorum (x = 36) and H. subnormale (x = 38) all Hymenasplenium species investigated have cytotypes based on x = 39. Molecular phylogenetic analyses using rbcL sequences have shown Hymenasplenium to be the most basally diverged monophyletic genus in Aspleniaceae, only distantly related to any of the remaining species of the family (Murakami, 1995; Gastony and Johnson, 2001; Schneider et al., 2004). As a consequence, we interpret the x = 36 of H. costarisorum as a convergent dysploid evolution in Hymenasplenium from x = 39 to 36. Hymenasplenium subnormale with n = 38 and n = 76, is closely related to H. cataractarum, H. apogamum and H. hondoense (Murakami, 1995), all based on x = 39. This indicates that dysploid karyotypes evolved at least twice independently in Hymenasplenium.

The establishment of the very successful base number x = 36 of Asplenium was another independent dysploid karyotype evolution within the family. Albeit the base number x = 36 is clearly dominant and most likely plesiomorphic for Asplenium, it is not as conservative and uniform as previously assumed. The tendency of descending dysploid cytoevolution of the family persists in the genus Asplenium with the evolution of the ‘loxoscaphoids’ with chromosome numbers based on x = 35. Additionally, Manton (1959) reported a chromosome number of n = 70II (tetraploid, with unusually large chromosomes) for A. diplazisorum from Ghana. There are no ecological, morphological or geographical indications that A. diplazisorum is related to the ‘loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium spp., and thus the dysploid reduction from x = 36 to 35 may have evolved at least twice independently within Asplenium.

With the confirmation of x = 35, currently four different base numbers that are well established within Aspleniaceae are known: x = 39 (Hymenasplenium: approx. 30 spp.), x = 38 (Hymenasplenium subnormale), x = 36 (Asplenium: approx. 700 spp., Hymenasplenium costarisorum) and x = 35 [Asplenium diplazisorum (to be confirmed), and ‘loxoscaphoids’: approx. five spp.]. These base numbers are plotted on a phyletic scheme of Aspleniaceae in Fig. 6, illustrating the postulated recurrent descending dysploid evolution of the family.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Putative phyletic scheme of cytoevolution within Aspleniaceae, based on cytological and rbcL data. Continuous lines and bold numbers in unbroken circles indicate most probable lines of evolution based on established basic chromosome numbers. Dotted lines and numbers in dotted circles indicate putative lines of evolution based on postulated transitional chromosome numbers.

Although many intriguing questions remain, it appears highly plausible that ‘loxoscaphoid’ Asplenium species evolved through dysploid chromosome number reduction from an ancestral karyotype with x = 36. We also propose that dysploid chromosome number reduction occurred at least five times in the (cyto)evolution of Aspleniaceae, leading to speciation at both the (sub)generic and species (group) level.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Guy Van Der Kinderen for his technical advice on flow cytometry and cytology. Our gratitude also goes to the anonymous reviewers, for their valuable comments and advice.

APPENDIX 1

List of taxa and samples used for meiotic and mitotic chromosome counts and flow cytometry. Species names and vouchers are in bold.

Asplenium centrafricanum Bellefroid EB392: Uganda, Western Prov., montane rainforest along road from Kabale to Kisoro, epiphytic, approx. 2302 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB393: Uganda, Western Prov., montane rainforest along road from Kabale to Kisoro, epiphytic, approx. 2302 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB396: Uganda, Western Prov., montane rainforest along road from Kabale to Kisoro, epiphytic, approx. 2302 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV11236: Uganda, Kanungu Distr., Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Podocarpus forest with bamboo along track from Ruhija to Ikumba, epiphytic, approx. 2430 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV11237: Uganda, Kanungu Distr., Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Podocarpus forest with bamboo along track from Ruhija to Ikumba, epiphytic, approx. 2430 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV11246: Uganda, Kabale Distr., Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Podocarpus forest with bamboo along track from Ruhija to Ikumba, approx. 2260 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x. A. loxoscaphoides Bellefroid EB324: Kenya, Coast Prov., Taita region, approx. 90 km south from Voi, Kasigau, path from Rukanga along water pipeline to water catchment area for Rukanga, lowland shrub forest, terrestrial in rocky soil, approx. 886 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB325: Kenya, Mt Kasigau, route from Rukanga along water pipeline to top, epilithic, approx. 886 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB337: Kenya, Coast Prov., Taita region, approx. 90 km south from Voi, Kasigau, at the water catchment area for Jora. edge of montane rainforest, epilitic on rocky outcrop, approx. 1150 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB339: Kenya, Mt Kasigau, route from Rukanga along water pipeline for Kiteghe, at water intake, epilithic, approx. 1174 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV7548: Tanzania, S. of Arusha National Park (Mt Meru), forest with Impatiens hochstetteri along tack to Mamela Gate, approx. 1780 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV7549: Tanzania, South of Arusha National Park (Mt Meru), forest with Impatiens hochstetteri along tack to Mamela Gate, approx. 1780 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x. A. rutifolium Bellefroid EB240: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Bvumba Mountains, Bunga Forest, epilithic, approx. 1622 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Bellefroid EB256: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Chimanimani Mountains National Park, along Baileys Folly trail, epiphytic, approx. 1572 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV6377C: South Africa, N. Transvaal, below Mariepskop, 40 km N of Graskop, approx. 1250 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV8730: Zimbabwe, Forest patch along rivulet along private 4-wheel track to Pungwe falls (Nyazengu Priv. Nat. Res.), approx. 2100 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV11549: South Africa, Western Cape, 26·5 km NE of Plettenberg, montane forest in Bloukranspass, approx. 600 m NW of bridge on Bloukransriver, approx. 150 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV11561: South Africa, Western Cape, approx. 7·5 km E of George, 3·4 km N of Wilderness, forest along George-Knyssna Rd, E bank of Silver River, approx. 120 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV8300: Reunion, NE of Cilaos, forest along GRR1, path to Caverne Dufour, above parking ‘Le Bloc’, approx. 1420 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV8301: Reunion, NE of Cilaos, forest along GRR1, path to Caverne Dufour, above parking ‘Le Bloc’, approx. 1420 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV8302: Reunion, NE of Cilaos, forest along GRR1, path to Caverne Dufour, above parking ‘Le Bloc’, approx. 1420 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x. A. sertularioides Bellefroid EB348: Uganda, Western Prov., Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail between Nyabitaba Hut and John Matte Hut, terrestrial along path in op patch between bamboo forest and Hagenia abyssinica montane cloud forest, approx. 2926 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB353: Uganda, Western Prov., Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail between Nyabitaba Hut and John Matte Hut, terrestrial along path trough Hagenia abyssinica montane cloud forest, approx. 2926 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB358: Uganda, Western Prov., Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail between Nyabitaba Hut and John Matte Hut, epilithic on rocks along Nyamleju River, Ericaceous zone, approx. 3234 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB360: Uganda, Western Prov., Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail in vicinity of Guy Yeoman Hut, terrestrial, Ericaceous zone, approx. 3483 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB373: Uganda, Western Prov., Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail in vicinity of Guy Yeoman Hut, terrestrial, Ericaceous zone, approx. 3483 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB383: Uganda, Western Prov., Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail between Nyabitaba Hut an Guy Yeoman Hut, terrestrial, Podocarpus zone, approx. 2650 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB408: Uganda, Kisoro District, Mgahinga Gorilla National park, Sabinyo Gorge, epiphytic, approx. 2464 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV11131: Uganda, Kasese Distr., eastern slopes of Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Hagenia zone between Nyabitaba Hut and John Matte Hut, epiphytic on Hagenia, approx. 2835 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV11156: Uganda, Kasese Distr., eastern slopes of Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Erica arboreaHypericumLobelia vegetation above Guy Yeoman Hut, approx. 3450 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x. A. theciferum Bellefroid EB238: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Bvumba Mountains, Bunga Forest, epiphytic, approx. 1610 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Bellefroid EB244: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Bvumba Mountains, Bunga Forest, epilithic, approx. 1634 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Bellefroid EB248: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Chimanimani Mountains National Park, near the waterfall left from the Mountain Hut, epilithic, approx. 1589 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Bellefroid EB306: Kenya, Coast Prov., Taita Hills, approx. 40 km west from Voi, Ngangao Forest, near the top with pine plantations, epiphytic on pine, approx. 1920 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB308: Kenya, Coast Prov., Taita Hills, approx. 40 km west from Voi, Ngangao Forest, near the rocky top, approx. 1900 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB342: Uganda, Kasese District, Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail in vicinity of Nyabitaba Hut, epiphytic in Podocarpus forest, approx. 2665 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB388: Uganda, Kasese District, Rwenzori Mountains National Park, Central Circuit Trail between Guy Yeoman Hut and Nyabitaba Hut, epiphytic in Podocarpus forest, approx. 2700 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Bellefroid EB395: Uganda, Western Prov., montane rainforest along road from Kabale to Kisoro, epiphytic, approx. 2302 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Bellefroid EB401: Uganda, Kisoro District, montane rainforest along road from Kabale to Kisoro, epiphytic, approx. 2302 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Bellefroid EB404: Uganda, Kisoro District, Mgahinga Gorilla National park, Sabinyo Gorge, epiphytic, approx. 2464 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Bellefroid EB407: Uganda, Kisoro District, Mgahinga Gorilla National park, Sabinyo Gorge, epiphytic, approx. 2464 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV7219: Ethiopia, southern slopes of Mt Batu, degraded forest, along track, approx. 2320 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV7541: Tanzania, South of Arusha National Park (Mt Meru), forest with Impatiens hochstetteri along tack to Mamela Gate, approx. 1780 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 4x; Viane RV10140: Venezuela, Sierra de la Culata, roadside forest margin at La Vergara, approx. 2400 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV10141: Venezuela, Sierra de la Culata, roadside forest margin at La Vergara, approx. 2400 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV10336: Venezuela, Aragua, N slopes of Pico Codazzi, jeep track, forest with Marattia and Didymochlaena, approx. 1860 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 8x; Viane RV11234: Uganda, Kanungu Distr., Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, along track from Butogota to Ruhija, approx. 2325 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Viane RV11488: South Africa, E. Transvaal (Mpumalunga), approx. 3·5 km NNE of Graskop, montane forest on escarpment N of Driekopskloof, approx. 1480 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Viane RV11494: South Africa, E. Transvaal (Mpumalunga), approx. 3·5 km NNE of Graskop, montane forest on escarpment N of Driekopskloof, approx. 1480 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x; Viane RV11500: South Africa, KwaZulu Natal, Ngoma forest approx. 62·5 km E of Vryheid and 25·4 km NW of Nongoma, SSE exposed slopes, approx. 1040–1060 m a.s.l., Ploidy: 12x

APPENDIX 2

List of taxa and samples used for the molecular analysis. Species names vouchers and GenBank accession numbers are in bold.

Asplenium aethiopicum (Burm.f.) Becherer subsp. filare (Forsk.) A.F.Braithw. Viane RV7416: Kenya, Mt Elgon Nat. Park, Hagenia-Erica arborea zone, rocky outcrop along track, approx. 3290 m a.s.l., GU586821. A. caudatum G.Forst. Siti Khadijah Rambe KH161: Peninsular Malaysia, Bukit Larut, terrestrial, approx. 600 m a.s.l., GU586818. A. ceterach L. Harris Chandra Pande 107295: India, Tangling Village, Pawari, Peo, Kinnaur, GU586814. A. laserpitiifolium Lam. s.l. Viane RV9714: Myanmar, Kachin State, Nam Sar Bung, sandy riverbed, approx. 450 m a.s.l., GU586816. A. nidus L. s.l. Siti Khadjah Rambe KH162: Peninsular Malaysia, Bukit Larut, epiphytic, approx. 1070 m a.s.l., GU586813. A. contiguum Kaulf. Siti Khadijah Rambe KH196: Indonesia, Nusa Tenggara Barat–Mataram, Mt Rinjani, terrestrial, approx. 2376 m a.s.l., GU586819. A. daucifolium L. subsp. lineatum (Sw.) C.V.Morton Viane RV8220: Réunion, Forêt de Bélouve, road to Gite, Cryptomeria plantation, approx. 1548 m a.s.l., GU586808. A. exiguum Bedd. Viane RV9341: China, Yunnan, Dêqên County, South of Dêqên, side valley of River Mekong, approx. 4 km North of Yanmen, approx. 2100 m a.s.l., GU586826. A. friesiorum C.Ch. Viane RV7715: Tanzania, SE of Mt Kilimanjaro, rainforest between Mandara Hut and Mandara Gate, approx. 2360 m a.s.l., GU586820. A. loxoscaphoides Bellefroid EB325: Kenya, Mt Kasigau, route from Rukanga along water pipeline to top, epilithic, approx. 886 m a.s.l., GU586802; Bellefroid EB339: Kenya, Mt Kasigau, route from Rukanga along water pipeline for Kiteghe, at water intake, epilithic, approx. 1174 m a.s.l., GU586801; Viane RV7548: Tanzania, S. of Arusha National Park (Mt Meru), forest with Impatiens hochstetteri along tack to Mamela Gate, approx. 1780 m a.s.l., GU586800; Viane RV7549: Tanzania, S. of Arusha National Park, Mt Meru, forest with Impatiens hochstetteri along tack to Mamela Gate, approx. 1780 m a.s.l., GU586803. A. monanthes L. Viane RV7368: Kenya, Aberdare Nat. Park, Chania Falls, Hagenia-Hypericum zone, approx. 2950 m a.s.l., GU586823. A. normale D.Don. Viane RV9705: Myanmar, Kachin State, along track in forest West of Nan Hti village (East of Putao), approx. 710 m a.s.l., GU586824. A. onopteris L. Viane RV8094: Spain, La Palma, SE of Llano Negro, above Casas de las Palmeras, Pinar, approx. 1270 m a.s.l., GU586792. A. phyllitidis D.Don. Siti Khadijah Rambe KH172: Indonesia, Nusa Tenggara Barat–Mataram, Mt Rinjani, epiphytic, approx. 510 m a.s.l., GU586812. A. polyodon G.Forst. Viane RV8545: Réunion, NW exposed slope of ‘Bras de la Plaine’, Le Pont d'Yves, sentier de la Petite Ravine, approx. 615 m a.s.l., GU586817. A. ruta-muraria L. Viane RV9553: Italy, Mt Lessini, between Mte. Terrazzo and Psso Ristele, limestone rocks along ‘202’, limestone rocks under Pinus mugo, approx. 1715 m a.s.l., GU586793. A. rutifolium Viane RV6377C: South Africa, N. Transvaal, below Mariepskop, 40 km N of Graskop, approx. 1250 m a.s.l., GU586804; Viane RV8301: Réunion, NE of Cilaos, forest along GRR1, path to Caverne Dufour, above parking ‘Le Bloc’, approx. 1420 m a.s.l., GU586807; Bellefroid EB240: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Bvumba Mountains, Bunga Forest, epilithic, approx. 1622 m a.s.l., GU586806; Viane RV8730: Zimbabwe, Forest patch along rivulet along private 4-wheel track to Pungwe falls (Nyazengu Priv. Nat. Res.), approx. 2100 m a.s.l., GU586805. A. sandersonii Hook. Viane RV7228: Ethiopia, S slopes of Mt Batu, degraded forest, along track, approx. 1610 m a.s.l., GU586811. A. scolopendrium L. Viane RVsn: Belgium, Namur, Bauche, East of Yvoir, GU586815. A. tenerum G.Forst. Siti Khadijah Rambe KH174: Indonesia, Nusa Tenggara Barat–Mataram, Mt Rinjani, epiphytic, approx. 550 m a.s.l., GU586810. A. tenuicaule Hayata Viane RV9991: Russian Federation, Altay Rep., N exposed limestone-marble rocks in valley on left bank of Katun, approx. 580 m a.s.l., GU586825. A. theciferum Bellefroid EB308: Kenya, Coast Prov., Taita Hills, approx. 40 km west from Voi, Ngangao Forest, near the rocky top, approx. 1900 m a.s.l., GU586796; Viane RV7541: Tanzania, South of Arusha National Park, Mt Meru, forest with Impatiens hochstetteri along tack to Mamela Gate, approx. 1780 m a.s.l., GU586799; Viane RV10140: Venezuela, Sierra de la Culata, roadside forest margin at La Vergara, approx. 2400 m a.s.l., GU586798; Viane RV10336: Venezuela, Aragua, N slopes of Pico Codazzi, jeep track, forest with Marattia and Didymochlaena, approx. 1860 m a.s.l., GU586794; Bellefroid EB238: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Bvumba Mountains, Bunga Forest, epiphytic, approx. 1610 m a.s.l., GU586797; Bellefroid EB244: Zimbabwe, Eastern Prov., Bvumba Mountains, Bunga Forest, epilithic, approx. 1634 m a.s.l., GU586795. A. thunbergii Kunze Siti Khadijah Rambe KH176: Indonesia, Nusa Tenggara Barat–Mataram, Mt Rinjani, epiphytic, approx. 550 m a.s.l., GU586809. A. trichomanes L. Harris Chandra Pande 106448: India, Niti Village, Joshimath Pawari, Chamali, Uttaranchal, GU586822. A. × lessinense Vida & Reichst. Viane RV9547: Italy, Mt Lessini, Colle della Gazza, SE of Rifugio CA. Battisti, approx. 1195 m a.s.l., GU586827. H. excisum (C.Presl) Tagawa & K.Iwats. Siti Khadijah Rambe KH17: Indonesia, Jambi privince, Kerinci-Seblat National Park, Mt Kerinci, approx. 1675 m a.s.l., GU586828. H. unilaterale (Lam.) Hayata Siti Khadijah Rambe KH165: Malaysia, Pahang state, Tioman Island, Mt Kajang, epilithic, approx. 200 m a.s.l., GU586829.

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Abraham A, Ninan CA, Mathew PM. Studies on the cytology and phylogeny of the pteridophytes. VII. Observations on one hundred species of south Indian ferns. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society. 1962;41:339–421. [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams KL, Wendel JF. Polyploidy and genome evolution in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2005;8:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bergius PJ. Caenopteris, novum e filicibus genus, descriptum. Acta Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae. 1786;6:248–250. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bir SS. Cytological observations on the East Himalayan members of Asplenium L. Current Science. 1960;29:445–447. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bir SS. Taxonomy of the Indian members of family “Aspleniaceae”. Memoirs of the Indian Botanical Society. 1962;4:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bir SS. Evolution of the Indian members of the genus Asplenium Linn. Memoirs of the Indian Botanical Society. 1963;4:41–50. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bir SS, Fraser-Jenkins CR, Lovis JD. Asplenium punjabense sp. nov. and its significance for the status of Ceterach and Ceterachopsis. Fern Gazette. 1985;13:54–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouharmont J. Cytotaxonomie et évolution chez les Asplenium. La Cellule. 1977;72:57–74. [Google Scholar]
  9. Braithwaite AF. The cytotaxonomy of the Asplenium splendens complex in South Africa. Journal of South African Botany. 1972;38:9–27. [Google Scholar]
  10. Braithwaite AF. The Asplenium aethiopicum complex in South Africa. Botanical Journal of the Linnaean Society. 1986;93:343–378. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brownsey PJ. A biosystematic investigation of the Asplenium lepidum complex. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 1976a;72:235–267. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brownsey PJ. The origins of Asplenium creticum and A. haussknechtii. New Phytologist. 1976b;76:523–542. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brownsey PJ. Polyploidy and aneuploidy in Hypolepis, and the evolution of the Dennstaedtiales. American Fern Journal. 1983;73:97–104. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chaerle P. Morphological, biometrical, karyological and anatomical studies of East African Afromontane spleenworts similar to Asplenium aethiopicum (Burm.f.) Bech. (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) 2005 PhD Thesis, Ghent University. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cheng X, Murakami N. Cytotaxonomic study of genus Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) in Xishuangbanna, southwestern China. Journal of Plant Research. 1998;111:495–500. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ching R-C, Wu S-H. On the genus Ceterachopsis (J. Sm.) Ching. Acta Phytotaxonomicae Sinicae. 1984;22:409–412. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ching R-C, Wu S-H. Studies on Asplenium varians Wall. ex Hook. et Grev. and confused species. Acta Phytotaxonomicae Sinicae. 1985;23:1–10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Copeland EB. Genera Filicum. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica Company; 1947. [Google Scholar]
  19. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin. 1987;19:11–15. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dyer AF. The culture of fern gametophytes for experimental investigation. In: Dyer AF, editor. The experimental biology of ferns. London: Academic Press; 1979. pp. 253–305. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gastony GJ, Johnson WP. Phylogenetic placements of Loxoscaphe thecifera (Aspleniaceae) and Actiniopteris radiata (Pteridaceae) based on analysis of rbcL nucleotide sequences. American Fern Journal. 2001;91:197–213. [Google Scholar]
  22. Gomez-Pignataro LD. Richerche citologiche sulle pteridofite della Costa Rica. I. Atti dell' Istituto Botanico “Giovanni Briosi” e Laboratorio Crittogamica Italiano dell' Universita di Pavia. 1971;7:29–31. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hasebe M, Omori T, Nakazawa M, Sano T, Kato M, Iwatsuki K. rbcL gene sequences provide evidence for the evolutionary lineages of leptosporangiate ferns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 1994;91:5730–5734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.12.5730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Heitz E. Der Nachweis der Chromosomen. Vergleichende Studien über ihre Zahl, Grösse und Form im Pflanzenreich I. Zeitschrift für Botanik. 1925;18:625–681. [Google Scholar]
  25. Herrero A, Pajarón S, Prada C. Isozyme variation and genetic relationships among taxa in the Asplenium obovatum group (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) American Journal of Botany. 2001;88:2040–2050. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Holttum REG. A revised flora of Malaya. An illustrated systematic account of the Malayan flora, including commonly cultivated plants. 2nd edn. II. Singapore: Government Printing Office; 1966. Ferns of Malaya. [Google Scholar]
  27. Holttum REG. Asplenium Linn., sect. Thamnopteris Presl. Garden's Bulletin Singapore. 1974;27:143–154. [Google Scholar]
  28. Iwatsuki K. Taxonomic studies of Pteridophyta X. 13. Asplenium sect. Hymenasplenium. Acta Phytotaxonomica Geobotanica. 1975;27:39–55. [Google Scholar]
  29. de Jussieu AL. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita, juxta methodum in Horto Regio Parisiensi exaratam, anno MDCCLXXIV. Paris: Herissant; 1789. [Google Scholar]
  30. Knox EB, Kowal RR. Chromosome-numbers of the East-African giant senecios and giant lobelias and their evolutionary significance. American Journal of Botany. 1993;80:847–853. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kramer KU, Viane RLL. Aspleniaceae. In: Kramer KU, Green PS, editors. Pteridophytes and gymnosperms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990. pp. 52–56. [Google Scholar]
  32. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. Polyploidy in angiosperms. Trends in Plant Science. 1997;2:470–476. [Google Scholar]
  33. Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004;82:651–663. [Google Scholar]
  34. Levy AA, Feldman M. Genetic and epigenetic reprogramming of the wheat genome upon allopolyploidization. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2004;82:607–613. [Google Scholar]
  35. Löve A, Löve D. Cytotaxonomy of the boreal taxa of Phyllitis. Acta Botanica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 1973;19:201–206. [Google Scholar]
  36. Lovis JD. The taxonomy of Asplenium trichomanes in Europe. British Fern Gazette. 1964;9:147–160. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lovis JD. A biosystematic approach to phylogenetic problems and its application to the Aspleniaceae. In: Jermy AC, Crabbe JA, Thomas BA, editors. The phylogeny and classification of the ferns. London: Academic Press; 1973. pp. 211–228. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lovis JD. Evolutionary patterns and processes in ferns. In: Preston RD, Woolhouse HW, editors. Advances in botanical research. London: Academic Press; 1977. pp. 229–415. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lovis JD, Lovis JV. Asplenium adulterinum and its probable parents. Proceedings of the Botanical Society of the British Isles. 1955;1:389–390. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lovis JD, Rasbach H, Rasbach K, Reichstein T. Asplenium azoricum and other ferns of the A. trichomanes group from the Azores. American Fern Journal. 1977;67:81–93. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lynch M, Force AG. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. American Naturalist. 2000;156:590–605. doi: 10.1086/316992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lysak MA, Berr A, Pecinka A, Schmidt R, McBreen K, Schubert I. Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2006;103:5224–5229. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510791103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Manton I. Problems of cytology and evolution in the Pteridophyta. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1950. [Google Scholar]
  44. Manton I. Cytological information on the ferns of West tropical Africa. In: Alston AHG, editor. The ferns and fern-allies of West tropical Africa. London: Crown Agents; 1959. pp. 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  45. Manton I, Sledge WA. Observations on the cytology and taxonomy of the pteridophyte flora of Ceylon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. Biological Sciences. 1954;238:127–185. [Google Scholar]
  46. Meyer DE. Zur Zytologie der Asplenien Mitteleuropas (I–XV) Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft. 1957;70:57–66. [Google Scholar]
  47. Meyer DE. Zur Zytologie der Asplenien Mitteleuropas (XVI–XX) Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft. 1958;71:11–20. [Google Scholar]
  48. Meyer DE. Zur Zytologie der Asplenien Mitteleuropas (XXI–XXIII) Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft. 1959;72:37–48. [Google Scholar]
  49. Meyer DE. Zur Zytologie der Asplenien Mitteleuropas (XXIV–XXVIII) Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft. 1960;73:386–394. [Google Scholar]
  50. Meyer DE. Zur Zytologie der Asplenien Mitteleuropas (XXIX. Abschlub) Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft. 1961;74:449–461. [Google Scholar]
  51. Mitui K, Murakami N, Iwatsuki K. Chromosomes and systematics of Asplenium sect. Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) American Journal of Botany. 1989;76:1689–1697. [Google Scholar]
  52. Morton CV, Lellinger DB. The Polypodiaceae subfamily Asplenioideae in Venezuela. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden. 1966;15:1–49. [Google Scholar]
  53. Murakami N. Systematics and evolutionary biology of the fern genus Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) Journal of Plant Research. 1995;108:257–268. [Google Scholar]
  54. Murakami N, Moran RC. Monograph of the neotropical species of Asplenium sect. Hymenasplenium (Aspleniaceae) Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 1993;80:1–38. [Google Scholar]
  55. Murakami N, Yokoyama J, Cheng X, Iwasaki H, Imaichi R, Iwatsuki K. Molecular alpha-taxonomy of Hymenasplenium obliquissimum complex (Aspleniaceae) based on rbcL sequence comparisons. Plant Species Biology. 1998;13:51–56. [Google Scholar]
  56. Murakami N, Nogami S, Watanabe M, Iwatsuki K. Phylogeny of Aspleniaceae inferred from rbcL nucleotide sequences. American Fern Journal. 1999;89:232–243. [Google Scholar]
  57. Perrie LR, Brownsey PJ. Genetic variation is not concordant with morphological variation in the fern Asplenium hookerianum sensu lato (Aspleniacae) American Journal of Botany. 2005a;92:1559–1564. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.9.1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Perrie LR, Brownsey PJ. Insights into the biogeography and polyploid evolution of New Zealand Asplenium from chloroplast DNA sequence data. American Fern Journal. 2005b;95:1–21. [Google Scholar]
  59. Pichi Sermolli REG. A look at the chromosome numbers in the families of Pteridophyta. Webbia. 1987;41:305–314. [Google Scholar]
  60. Pinter I, Bakker F, Barrett J, et al. Phylogenetic and biosystematic relationships in four highly disjunct polyploid complexes in the subgenera Ceterach and Phyllitis in Asplenium (Aspleniaceae) Organisms Diversity and Evolution. 2002;2:299–311. [Google Scholar]
  61. Posada D, Crandall KA. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Systematic Biology. 2001;50:580–601. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Prelli R, Rasbach H, Viane R. Asplenium×sleepiae nothosubsp. krameri (A. foreziense×A. obovatum subsp. obovatum), a fern hybrid new for France (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) Acta Botanica Gallica. 1998;145:21–27. [Google Scholar]
  63. Reichstein T. Hybrids in European Aspleniaceae (Pteridophyta) Botanica Helvetica. 1981;91:89–139. [Google Scholar]
  64. Reichstein T. Conert HJ, Hamann U, Schultze-Motel W, Wagenitz G, editors. Aspleniaceae. Gustav Hegi Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa. Band 1, Pteridophyta. Teil 1. 1984:211–275. [Google Scholar]
  65. Reichstein T, Lovis JD, Greuter W, Zaffran J. Die Asplenien der Insel Kreta. Annales Musei Goulandris. 1973;1:133–163. [Google Scholar]
  66. Rieseberg LH. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2001;16:351–358. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rumsey F, Russell S, Schäfer H, Rasbach H. Distribution, ecology and cytology of Asplenium azoricum Lovis, Rasbach & Reichstein (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) and its hybrids. American Fern Journal. 2004;94:113–125. [Google Scholar]
  68. Rye BL, James SH. The relationship between dysploidy and reproductive capacity in Myrtaceae. Australian Journal of Botany. 1992;40:829–848. [Google Scholar]
  69. Salvo AE, Prada C, Díaz T. Revisíon del género Asplenium L. subgénero Pleurosorus (Fée) Salvo, Prada & Diaz. Candollea. 1982;37:457–484. [Google Scholar]
  70. Scheid OM, Jakovleva L, Afsar K, Maluszinska J, Paszkowski J. A change of ploidy can modify epigenetic silencing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 1996;93:7114–7119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Schneeweiss GM, Palomeque T, Cowell AE, Weiss-Schneeweiss H. Chromosome numbers and karyotype evolution in holoparasitic Orobanche (Orobanchaceae) and related genera. American Journal of Botany. 2004;91:439–448. doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.3.439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Schneider H, Ranker TA, Russell SJ, et al. Origin of the endemic fern genus Diellia coincides with the renewal of Hawaiian terrestrial life in the Miocene. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 2005;272:455–460. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schneider H, Russell SJ, Cox C, et al. Chloroplast phylogeny of asplenioid ferns based on rbcL and trnL-F spacer sequences (Polypodiidae, Aspleniaceae) and its implications for biogeography. Systematic Botany. 2004;29:260–274. [Google Scholar]
  74. Schubert I. Chromosome evolution. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2007;10:109–115. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Shan FC, Yan GJ, Plummer JA. Basic chromosome number in Boronia (Rutaceae): competing hypotheses examined. Australian Journal of Botany. 2006;54:681–689. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sledge WA. The Ceylon species of Asplenium. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History)–Botany. 1965;3:235–277. [Google Scholar]
  77. Sleep A. Some taxonomic problems in the fern genera Asplenium and Polystichum. 1966 PhD Thesis, University of Leeds. [Google Scholar]
  78. Sleep A. On the genus Asplenium in the Iberian Peninsula. Acta Botanica Malacitensis. 1983;8:11–46. [Google Scholar]
  79. Smith AR, Pryer KM, Schuettpelz E, Korall P, Schneider H, Wolf PG. A classification for extant ferns. Taxon. 2006;55:705–731. [Google Scholar]
  80. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Molecular-data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 1993;12:243–273. [Google Scholar]
  81. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 1999;14:348–352. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01638-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Bennett MD, Leitch IJ. Evolution of genome size in the angiosperms. American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1596–1603. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.11.1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Tate JA. Advances in the study of polyploidy since Plant speciation. New Phytologist. 2004;161:173–191. [Google Scholar]
  84. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2000;97:7051–7057. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Stace HM, James SH. Another perspective on cytoevolution in Lobelioideae (Campanulaceae) American Journal of Botany. 1996;83:1356–1364. [Google Scholar]
  86. Stace HM, Armstrong JA, James SH. Cytoevolutionary patterns in Rutaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 1993;187:1–28. [Google Scholar]
  87. Stace HM, Chapman AR, Lemson KL, Powell JM. Cytoevolution, phylogeny and taxonomy in Epacridaceae. Annals of Botany. 1997;79:283–290. [Google Scholar]
  88. Stebbins GL. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London: Edward Arnold; 1971. [Google Scholar]
  89. Stothard P. The sequence manipulation suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques. 2000;28:1102–1104. doi: 10.2144/00286ir01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Swofford DL. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony* and other methods. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 2002. Version 4·0 beta version. [Google Scholar]
  91. Sylvestre LS, Windisch PG. Diversity and distribution patterns of Aspleniaceae in Brazil. In: Chandra S, Srivastava M, editors. Pteridology in the new millenium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. pp. 107–120. [Google Scholar]
  92. Tardieu-Blot M-L. Asplenium malgaches. I. Sur le polymorphisme de certains Asplenium mise au point systématique. Mémoires de l'Institut Scientifique de Madagascar, Série B, Biologie Végétal. 1956a;7:47–51. [Google Scholar]
  93. Tardieu-Blot M-L. Asplenium malgaches. II. Quatre Asplenium nouveaux. Mémoires de l'Institut Scientifique de Madagascar, Série B, Biologie Végétal. 1956b;7:51–53. [Google Scholar]
  94. Tardieu-Blot M-L. Sur un Antigramma de Madagascar, et sur la repartition géographique des genres Antigramma et Schaffneria. Naturaliste Malgache. 1957;9:29–32. [Google Scholar]
  95. Taylor JS, Van de Peer Y, Meyer A. Genome duplication, divergent resolution and speciation. Trends in Genetics. 2001;17:299–301. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(01)02318-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Trewick SA, Morgan-Richards M, Russell SJ, et al. Polyploidy, phylogeography and Pleistocene refugia of the rockfern Asplenium ceterach: evidence from chloroplast DNA. Molecular Ecology. 2002;11:2003–2012. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01583.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Van den heede C. A biosystematic study of Asplenium subgenus Ceterach (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) based on cytology, morphology, anatomy, isozyme analysis, and DNA sequencing. 2003 doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.3.481. PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Van den heede CJ, Viane RLL. New species and new hybrids in Asplenium subgenus Ceterach (Aspleniaceae) GEP News. 2002;9:1–4. [Google Scholar]
  100. Van den heede CJ, Pajarón S, Pangua E, Viane RLL. A new species and a new hybrid of Asplenium (Aspleniaceae) from Cyprus and evidence of their origin. Belgian Journal of Botany. 2002;135:92–116. [Google Scholar]
  101. Van den heede CJ, Viane RLL, Chase MW. Phylogenetic analysis of Asplenium subgenus Ceterach (Pteridophyta: Aspleniaceae) based on plastid and nuclear ribosomal ITS DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:481–495. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.3.481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Van den heede CJ, Pajarón S, Pangua E, Viane RLL. Asplenium ceterach and A. octoploideum on the Canary Islands (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) American Fern Journal. 2004;94:81–111. [Google Scholar]
  103. Viane RLL. A multivariate morphological-anatomical analysis of the perispore in Aspleniaceae. 1992 PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  104. Viane RLL, Reichstein T. Notes on new or interesting Asplenium species from western Asia, including comments on Ching and Wu (1985), and Fraser-Jenkins (1992). Reliquiae Reichsteinianae 1. In: Chandra S, Srivastava M, editors. Pteridology in the new millenium. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2003. pp. 73–105. [Google Scholar]
  105. Viane RLL, Van Cotthem W. Spore morphology and stomatal characters of some Kenyan Asplenium species. Berichte der Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft. 1977;90:219–239. [Google Scholar]
  106. Viane RLL, Van Cotthem W. Spore morphology and stomatal types in the fern genera Asplenium, Ceterach and Phyllitis Aspleniaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica. 1979;27:435. [Google Scholar]
  107. Vida G. A new Asplenium (Sectio Ceterach) species and the problem of the origin of Phyllitis hybrida (Milde) C. Christ. Acta Botanicae Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 1963;9:197–215. [Google Scholar]
  108. Vogel JC, Russell SJ, Barrett JA, Gibby M. A non-coding region of chloroplast DNA as a tool to investigate reticulate evolution in European Asplenium. In: Camus JM, Gibby M, Johns RJ, editors. Pteridology in perspective. London: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; 1996. pp. 313–327. [Google Scholar]
  109. Vogel JC, Rumsey FJ, Schneller JJ, et al. The origin, status and distribution of Asplenium presolanense spec. nov. (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) Botanica Helvetica. 1998a;108:269–288. [Google Scholar]
  110. Vogel JC, Russell SJ, Rumsey FJ, Barrett JA, Gibby M. Evidence for maternal transmission of chloroplast DNA in the genus Asplenium (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) Botanica Acta. 1998b;111:247–249. [Google Scholar]
  111. Vogel JC, Russell SJ, Rumsey FJ, Barrett JA, Gibby M. On hybrid formation in the rock fern Asplenium×alternifolium (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) Botanica Acta. 1998c;111:241–246. [Google Scholar]
  112. Vogel JC, Barrett JA, Rumsey FJ, Gibby M. Identifying multiple origins in polyploid homosporous pteridophytes. In: Hollingsworth PM, Bateman RM, Gornall RJ, editors. Molecular systematics and plant evolution. London: Taylor & Francis; 1999a. pp. 101–117. [Google Scholar]
  113. Vogel JC, Rumsey FJ, Russell SJ, et al. Genetic structure, reproductive biology and ecology of isolated populations of Asplenium csikii (Aspleniaceae, Pteridophyta) Heredity. 1999b;83:604–612. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6886120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Wagner WH., Jr The fern genus Diellia. Its structure, affinities and taxonomy. University of California Publications in Botany. 1952;26:1–212. [Google Scholar]
  115. Wagner WH., Jr The genus Diellia and the value of characters in determining fern affinities. American Journal of Botany. 1953;40:34–40. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wagner WH., Jr Reticulate evolution in the Appalachian aspleniums. Evolution. 1954;7:103–118. [Google Scholar]
  117. Wendel JF. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Molecular Biology. 2000;42:225–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Werth CR, Windham MD. A model for divergent, allopatric speciation of polyploid pteridophytes resulting from silencing of duplicate-gene expression. American Naturalist. 1991;137:515–526. [Google Scholar]
  119. Werth CR, Guttman SI, Eshbaugh WH. Recurring origins of allopolyploid species in Asplenium. Science. 1985a;228:731–733. doi: 10.1126/science.228.4700.731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Werth CR, Guttman SI, Eshbaugh WH. Electrophoretic evidence of reticulate evolution in the Appalachian Asplenium complex. Systematic Botany. 1985b;10:184–192. [Google Scholar]
  121. Windham MD, Yatskievych G. Chromosome studies of cheilanthoid ferns (Pteridaceae: Cheilanthoideae) from the western United States and Mexico. American Journal of Botany. 2003;90:1788–1800. doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.12.1788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Wu S-H. Materials of Chinese Aspleniaceae I. Bulletin of Botanical Research Harbin. 1989a;9:79–95. [Google Scholar]
  123. Wu S-H. Materials of Chinese Aspleniaceae II. Guihaia. 1989b;9:289–292. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zonneveld BJM, Leitch IJ, Bennett MD. First nuclear DNA amounts in more than 300 angiosperms. Annals of Botany. 2005;96:229–244. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Zwickl DJ. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. 2006a PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin. [Google Scholar]
  126. Zwickl DJ. Genetic Algorithm for Likelihood Inference. 2006b www.bio.utexas.edu/faculty/antisense/garli/Garli.html , accessed 8 December 2008. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES