Abstract
Cell-cycle checkpoint mechanisms, including the p53- and p21-dependent G2 arrest that follows DNA damage, are often lost during tumorigenesis. We have exploited the ability of DNA-damaging drugs to elicit this checkpoint, and we show here that such treatment allows microtubule drugs, which cause cell death secondary to mitotic arrest, to kill checkpoint-deficient tumor cells while sparing checkpoint-competent cells. Low doses of the DNA-damaging drug doxorubicin cause predominantly G2 arrest without killing HCT116 cells that harbor wt p53. Doxorubicin treatment prevented mitotic arrest, Bcl-2 phosphorylation, and cell death caused by paclitaxel, epothilones, and vinblastine. In contrast, doxorubicin enhanced cytotoxicity of FR901228, an agent that does not affect microtubules. Low doses of doxorubicin did not arrest p21-deficient clones of HCT116 cells and did not protect these cells from cytotoxicity caused by microtubule drugs, but cells in which p21 expression was restored enjoyed partial protection under these conditions. Moreover, in p53-deficient clones of HCT116 cells doxorubicin did not induce either p53 or p21 and provided no protection against paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity. Therefore, (a) p53-dependent p21 induction caused by doxorubicin protects from microtubule drug-induced cytotoxicity, and (b) pretreatment with cytostatic doses of DNA-damaging drugs before treatment with microtubule drugs results in selective cytotoxicity to cancer cells with defective p53/p21-dependent checkpoint.
Introduction
Microtubule-active and DNA-damaging drugs are widely used in the treatment of cancer (1, 2), but toxicity to normal cells limits the benefits of chemotherapy. DNA damage causes accumulation of wt p53 protein (3), which in turn transcriptionally induces p21WAF1/CIP1 (4) and inhibits cell-cycle progression at G1 and G2 phases (5–8). Loss of wt p53 function is the most common genetic alteration in cancer (9–11). In thymocytes and E1A-transformed fibroblasts, wt p53 is required for apoptosis caused by DNA damage (12, 13). In human cancer cells, the relationship between loss of p53 and drug sensitivity is more complex (14), but inactivation of p53 often correlates with resistance to DNA-damaging drugs (15–17). Although viewed as an unfavorable event, inactivation of p53 could be elegantly exploited for therapeutic advantage (18). Here we propose an alternative approach.
As demonstrated by Bunz et al., lack of wt p53 or its transcriptional target, p21, allows cells to enter mitosis after DNA damage, whereas cells with wt p53 are arrested at the G2 phase (19). We envisioned that this seemingly slight difference could be exploited to achieve a selective response to microtubule-active drugs such as paclitaxel, epothilones, and vinca alkaloids. Microtubule drugs interfere with the assembly of the mitotic spindle and arrest cells in mitosis, ultimately causing cell death (20–22).
Here we show that cytostatic doses of DNA-damaging drugs transform toxic mitotic arrest caused by microtubule-active drug to nontoxic G2 arrest, thus abrogating cell death. This protection requires an intact p53/p21 pathway and consequently can be exploited for selective killing of cancer cells lacking normal G2 checkpoint.
Methods
Cell lines.
The human colon cancer cell line HCT116, and 2 clones lacking p21 (p21–/–), S4 and S14, generated from HCT116 cells (7) were a gift from B. Vogelstein (John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA). The clone lacking p53 (p53–/–) generated from HCT116 cells (14) was a gift from B. Vogelstein. HPV-E6–expressing clones of HCT116 cells, HCT-E6, were a gift from W.S. El-Deiry (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) and have been described previously (23). Parental HCT116 colon cancer cells are characterized by normal p53/p21 checkpoint. Cells lacking p53 and p21 fail to be arrested in the G2 phase after radiation, enter mitosis, and undergo endoreplication (14, 19).
Reagents.
Reagents used were paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers, Princeton, New Jersey, USA) with a stock solution of 6 mg/mL; vincristine and vinblastine (Eli Lilly Co., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) with a stock solution of 1 mg/mL, or were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and dissolved in ethanol at 1 mg/mL. Epothilones A and B were provided by F. Lee (Bristol-Myers) and dissolved in water. Adriamycin was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. and dissolved in DMSO as a 2 mg/mL stock solution. FR901228 (depsipeptide) was obtained from Chemistry and Synthesis Branch (National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) and prepared as a 1 mg/mL stock solution in water.
p53 and p21 expression vectors.
Ad-p53, a wt p53–expressing replication-deficient adenovirus, and Ad-LacZ, a β-galactosidase–expressing replication-deficient adenovirus were obtained from B. Vogelstein. Ad-p21, a wt p21–expressing adenovirus was obtained from W.S. El-Deiry, and viral titer was determined as described previously (23).
Western blot analysis.
Proteins were harvested in TNESVF buffer (50 mM Tris HCl [pH 7.5], 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM sodium ortovanadate, sodium fluoride, 1% NP-40) with protease inhibitors and were resolved on 12.5% for p21WAF1/CIP1 or Bcl-2, and on 7.5% SDS-PAGE for Raf-1, p120, mdm-2 and p53 detection as described previously (23). If indicated, proteins were resolved on NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris gel with MOPS running buffer (NOVEX, San Diego, California, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Immunoblot was performed using the following antibodies: antihuman monoclonal WAF1 (EA10), p53 (PAb2) and mdm-2 antibodies (Oncogene Research Products, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA) anti–Raf-1 rabbit polyclonal (C12; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, California, USA), and antihuman Bcl-2 monoclonal (DAKO Corp., Carpinteria, California, USA) antibodies.
MTT assay.
A total of 2000 cells were plated in 96-well flat-bottom plates in 100 μL of medium. The next day, cells were exposed to the pharmacological agents. After 2 days of the last drug addition, 20 μL of 5 mg/mL MTT solution in PBS was added to each well for 4 hours. The medium was discarded, and 170 μL DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the formazan crystals. The absorbance at 540 nm was determined using a Biokinetics plate reader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, Vermont, USA). Triplicate wells were assayed for each condition, and standard deviations were determined.
Mitotic index.
Cells were centrifuged, fixed, and stained with DAPI. For each sample, 100–500 cells were randomly counted by microscopy, and mitotic cells were scored by their lack of nuclear membrane and evidence of chromosome condensation.
DNA synthesis.
DNA synthesis was monitored by [3H]thymidine incorporation. In brief, 2,000 cells were plated in 96-well flat-bottom plates, or 15, 000 cells were plated in 24-well plates. The next day, cells were treated with drugs. At the indicated time, cells were incubated with 1 μCi [methyl3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Piscataway, New Jersey, USA) for an additional 4–8 hours, and then acid-insoluble radioactivity was determined.
Number of dead and alive cells.
A total of 25, 000 cells were plated in 24-well plates in 1 mL of medium. The next day, cells were treated with the drugs. After 3–4 days, cells were trypsinized and each condition was counted in triplicate on a Coulter Z1 cell counter (Coulter Electronics Ltd., Hialeah, Florida, USA). In addition, cells were incubated with trypan blue, and the number of blue (dead) cells and transparent (live) cells was counted by microscopy.
Cell-cycle analysis.
Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed with PBS, resuspended in 75% ethanol in PBS, and kept at 40°C for at least 30 minutes. Before analysis, cells were washed again with PBS and resuspended and then incubated for 30 minutes in propidium iodide staining solution containing 0.05 mg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma Chemical Co.), 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton-X-100, and 1 mg/mL RNAse A in PBS. The suspension was then passed through a nylon mesh filter and analyzed on a Becton Dickinson FACScan (Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA).
Results
Lack of paclitaxel effects in doxorubicin-arrested HCT116 cells.
Exposure of HCT116 cells to either microtubule drugs such as paclitaxel (PTX) or to low doses of DNA-damaging drugs such as 50–100 ng/mL doxorubicin (DOX) causes accumulation of cells predominantly in G2/M phase. In addition to G2/M arrest, doxorubicin causes G1 arrest (Figure 1a). Cells pretreated with 100 ng/mL doxorubicin for 12 hours and then treated with 100 ng/mL PTX for an additional 16 hours had essentially the same cell-cycle distribution as did cells treated with doxorubicin alone (Figure 1a). Although both G2 and mitotic arrest are included in the G2/M peak and thus are indistinguishable on cytometry (Figure 1a), they can be easily distinguished by mitotic index (Figure 1b). Thus, although the G2/M arrest by paclitaxel was exclusively mitotic, the G2/M arrest by doxorubicin was exclusively G2. Pretreatment with doxorubicin prevented mitotic arrest caused by PTX (Figure 1, b and c). Mitotic arrest coincides with the appearance of round cells (Figure 1c, PTX) and culminates in cell death within 2 days. Pretreatment with doxorubicin completely prevented the effects of paclitaxel on morphology (Figure 1c, DOX + PTX versus PTX).
Mitotic arrest caused by paclitaxel is associated with phosphorylation of proteins on multiple serine residues (22) with characteristic mobility shift such as shown for Bcl-2 protein (Figure 1d). Doxorubicin-pretreatment abrogated this early marker of the paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity (Figure 1d), determining different cell fate. Although cell viability dropped after paclitaxel treatment, pretreatment with doxorubicin prevented this decline (Figure 1e). Cytostatic doses of another DNA-damaging drug, etoposide, were also cytoprotective against paclitaxel (data not shown). [3H]Thymidine incorporation was decreased by either paclitaxel or doxorubicin, and, as expected, pretreatment with doxorubicin could not restore [3H]thymidine incorporation (Figure 1f). A decrease in the number of dead cells was the most sensitive test to determine cytoprotection after 3 days (Figure 1g). Also, minimal cell death was observed in doxorubicin-pretreated cells even after 7 days (data not shown).
p21 overexpression is partially protective against paclitaxel in HCT116 cells.
Previous studies have shown that p53-dependent p21 induction is required for G1 and G2 arrests after DNA damage (7, 8, 19). Consequently, we examined the ability of a p21-expressing adenovirus (Ad-p21) to protect from paclitaxel cytotoxicity. Treatment with doxorubicin and overexpression of p21-arrested cells with different proportion of the phases G1 or G2 arrests. Although doxorubicin caused predominantly G2 arrest, overexpression of exogenous p21 caused predominantly G1 arrest in HCT116 cells (Figure 2a). A proportion of cells that arrested at G1 or G2 after DNA damage depends on cell type and the levels of p53/p21 induction (19, 24). Doxorubicin induced both p53 and p21, whereas infection with Ad-p21 increased p21 only (Figure 2b). The level of p21 in the Ad-p21–infected cells was substantially higher than in doxorubicin-treated cells. The differences in cell-cycle distribution between doxorubicin-treated cells and those infected with Ad-p21 may be explained by differences in the levels of p21, with higher levels resulting in G1 instead of G2 arrest in HCT116 cells. Furthermore, wt p53 induced by doxorubicin can activate other targets that participate in the G2 checkpoint (25, 26). Regardless of the distribution in G1 versus G2, overexpression of p21 partially abrogated early events associated with paclitaxel-induced mitotic arrest and cytotoxicity (Figure 2b). Hyperphosphorylation of Raf-1 protein, a marker of mitotic arrest of microtubule drugs, was diminished not only by doxorubicin but also by p21 (Figure 2b). Accumulation of the p120 nucleolar protein, a sensitive marker of the drug-induced cytotoxicity (27), was dramatically induced by paclitaxel (Figure 2b, lane 1 versus lane 2). In contrast to cytotoxic doses, cytostatic doses of doxorubicin do not affect p120 protein levels (27), and as shown in Figure 2b, both doxorubicin and Ad-p21 abrogated paclitaxel-induced p120 protein accumulation. However, infection with Ad-p21 was less effective than doxorubicin in preventing cell death, as measured after 48 hours of exposure to paclitaxel (Figure 2c). This difference can be explained by the fact that doxorubicin completely arrested cells, whereas alone, p21 cannot completely sustain cell-cycle arrest and, over time, allows cells to enter mitosis.
Doxorubicin is not protective in cells lacking p21.
To elucidate further the role of p21, we utilized HCT116 cells lacking p21 (p21–/– cells) which, as previously shown, do not undergo G1 or G2 growth arrest after radiation (7, 19). As expected, doxorubicin induced both Mdm-2 and p21, p53-responsive proteins, in HCT116 cells, whereas it induced mdm-2 but not p21 in p21–/– cells (Figure 3a). Doxorubicin inhibited [3H]thymidine incorporation in parental cells, but this was less pronounced in p21–/– cells (Figure 3b). In contrast to parental cells, p21–/– cells were not protected against paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity (Figure 3, c and d). It is important to emphasize that doses above 100 ng/mL were toxic to both p21–/– and parental cells. In agreement with previous reports (8, 19), p21-deficient cells are more sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of doxorubicin and undergo cell death by day 4, whereas cytostatic doses of doxorubicin did not kill HCT116 arrested in G2 phase for at least 1 week. Growth arrest without cell death, which can be achieved in parental cells, cannot be achieved in p21–/– cells, consequently cytoprotection against paclitaxel is lost.
In HCT116 cells, doxorubicin-pretreatment prevented cell death caused by other microtubule drugs including vincristine, Colcemid (depolymerizing agents), and epothilone A (like paclitaxel, a polymerizing agent) (Figure 4a). In p21–/– cells, all of these drugs were cytotoxic despite pretreatment with doxorubicin (Figure 4b). We next investigated FR901228, an experimental therapeutic drug and histone deacetylase inhibitor that does not interact with tubulin or microtubules but, in addition to G1 and G2 arrest, induces mitotic arrest in 20–25% of cells (28, 29). Given the ability to induce mitotic arrest in such large proportion of cells, FR901228 is the most appropriate control available with which to compare the microtubule-active drugs. Doxorubicin did not prevent cell death caused by FR901228 (Figure 4), indicating that its cytotoxicity may not require mitotic arrest and also that cytoprotection may be selective to microtubule-active drugs whose main mechanism of cytotoxicity is mitotic arrest. Furthermore, FR901228 -induced cytotoxicity was enhanced in cell pretreated with doxorubicin (Figure 4).
Reintroduction of p21 into p21–/– cells results in high levels of p21 (Figure 5a). Cell-cycle analysis revealed that p21 arrested p21–/– cells at the G2 and G1 phases (Figure 5b) and partially abrogated paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity (Figure 5c). Therefore, p21, but not doxorubicin, was able to diminish cell death induced by paclitaxel in the cells lacking endogenous p21.
Lack of cytoprotection in p53-deficient HCT116 cells.
We next examined HCT116 cells lacking wt p53 gene (p53–/–) (19). P53 protein was undetectable in p53–/– cells (Figure 6a), and, as in p21–/– cells, doxorubicin could not induce p21 (Figure 6a). p53–/– cells were more resistant to paclitaxel than p21–/– cells (Figure 6b). Despite this difference in the basal sensitivity to paclitaxel, neither p53–/– cells nor p21–/– cells were protected by doxorubicin from paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity (Figure 6b). Similar results were obtained with E6-expressing HCT116 cells with undetectable p53 protein (data not shown).
Discussion
One of the greatest challenges in cancer therapy is to develop treatment regimens with improved therapeutic indices by exploiting the disruption of checkpoint controls in tumor cells (30–34). As has been convincingly demonstrated previously (8, 19), the G2 arrest that follows DNA damage depends on p53 and p21, whereas cells lacking p53 or p21 enter mitosis (19). We exploited this difference in checkpoint fidelity, taking into account that microtubule-active drugs, such as paclitaxel or vinca alkaloids, can induce mitotic arrest only in cells that enter mitosis; and in turn, prolonged mitotic arrest causes cell death (22). We demonstrate that low doses of a DNA-damaging drug, doxorubicin, predominantly induces G2 arrest in HCT116 cells and thus protects against cytotoxicity induced by microtubule drugs. Paclitaxel-induced mitotic arrest is accompanied by protein hyperphosphorylation and is followed by cell death, whereas pretreatment with 100 ng/mL doxorubicin for 12–16 hours abrogates these events. Protection by doxorubicin from the cytotoxicity of other microtubule-active drugs (epothilones A and B, vincristine) was also achieved. Thus, cells with intact checkpoints can be protected by pretreatment with a DNA-damaging agent, and the optimal dose is that which induces a sustained G2 arrest without cell death.
In agreement with previous results after radiation (19), both the G1 and G2 arrests induced by low doses of doxorubicin are p21 dependent, and, despite pretreatment with doxorubicin, p21–/– cells died 2 days after treatment with microtubule-active drugs. Furthermore, overexpression of p21 alone using an Ad-p21 vector provided partial cytoprotection from paclitaxel. In addition, even though p53-deficient HCT116 cells were somewhat more resistant to paclitaxel than were either parental or p21-deficient cells, they were not protected by doxorubicin from paclitaxel cytotoxicity.
Cytoprotective effects of p21 against paclitaxel-induced cytotoxicity have been demonstrated previously (35–38). Those studies implied that cytoprotection was due to inhibition of Cdc2 kinase causing cell exit from mitosis. In our model, cytoprotection by DNA damage exploits different phenomena. First, induction of p21 by doxorubicin causes complete cytoprotection by preventing entry into mitosis. Second, although p21 is required for the doxorubicin-mediated abrogation of paclitaxel cytotoxicity, p21 cannot substitute for doxorubicin. High p21 levels after Ad-p21 induced predominantly G1 arrest, whereas doxorubicin predominantly arrested HCT116 cells at G2. Thus, although p21 is required, doxorubicin may use additional mechanisms (25, 26) as well as p53-independent pathways. Therefore, doxorubicin-induced arrest is not equivalent to p21- or p53-induced arrest. Indeed, cytostatic doses of doxorubicin are more effective than p21 in providing cytoprotection against microtubule drugs. Finally, although cytoprotection by p21 is biologically significant, cytoprotection by drugs could be potentially used in clinical practice. Doxorubicin, used in the present study, is protective over a narrow concentration range because of the toxicity at higher doses. However, it provides a model for protection of cells using their intact checkpoints, whereas less toxic drugs could be exploited to induce p53 and p21.
Acknowledgments
We thank B. Vogelstein and W.S. El-Deiry for cell lines and reagents.
References
- 1.Horwitz SB. Mechanism of action of taxol. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 1992;13:134–136. doi: 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90048-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC. Paclitaxel (Taxol) N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1004–1014. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199504133321507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kastan MB, Onyekwere O, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B, Craig RW. Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res. 1991;51:6304–6311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.El-Deiry WS, et al. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell. 1993;75:817–825. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90500-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Brugarolas J, et al. Radiation-induced cell cycle arrest compromised by p21 deficiency. Nature. 1995;377:552–557. doi: 10.1038/377552a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Deng C, Zhang P, Harper JW, Elledge SJ, Leder P. Mice lacking p21CIP1/WAF1 undergo normal development, but are defective in G1 checkpoint control. Cell. 1995;82:675–684. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90039-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Waldman T, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. p21 is necessary for the p53-mediated G1 arrest in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 1995;55:5187–5190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Waldman T, Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Uncoupling of S phase and mitosis induced by anticancer agents in cells lacking p21. Nature. 1996;381:643–644. doi: 10.1038/381713a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fearon ER, Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell. 1990;61:759–767. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. p53 function and dysfunction. Cell. 1992;70:523–526. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90421-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Levine AJ. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell. 1997;88:323–331. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clarke AR, et al. Thymocyte apoptosis induced by p53-dependent and independent pathway. Nature. 1993;362:849–852. doi: 10.1038/362849a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lowe SW, Ruley HE, Jacks T, Housman DE. p53-dependent apoptosis modulates the cytotoxicity of anticancer agents. Cell. 1993;74:957–967. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90719-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bunz F, et al. Disruption of p53 in human cancer cells alters the responses to therapeutic agents. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:263–269. doi: 10.1172/JCI6863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lowe SW, et al. p53 status and the efficacy of cancer therapy in vivo. Science. 1994;266:807–810. doi: 10.1126/science.7973635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lowe SW. Cancer therapy and p53. Curr Opin Oncol. 1995;7:547–553. doi: 10.1097/00001622-199511000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.O’Connor PM, et al. Characterization of the p53 tumor suppressor pathway in cell lines of the National Cancer Institute anticancer drug screen and correlations with growth-inhibitory potency of 123 anticancer agents. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4285–4300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Komarov PG, et al. A chemical inhibitor of p53 that protects mice from the side effects of cancer therapy. Science. 1999;285:1733–1737. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5434.1733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bunz F, et al. Requirement for p53 and p21 to sustain G2 arrest after DNA damage. Science. 1998;282:1497–1501. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Torres K, Horwitz SB. Mechanisms of Taxol-induced cell death are concentration dependent. Cancer Res. 1998;58:3620–3626. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jordan MA, Wilson L. Microtubules and actin filaments: dynamic targets for cancer chemotherapy. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1998;10:123–130. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(98)80095-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Blagosklonny MV, Fojo T. Molecular effects of paclitaxel: myths and reality. Int J Cancer. 1999;83:151–156. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19991008)83:2<151::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Blagosklonny MV, Somasundaram K, Wu GS, El-Deiry WS. Wild-type p53 is not sufficient for serum starvation-induced apoptosis in cancer cells but accelerates apoptosis in sensitive cells. Int J Oncol. 1997;11:1165–1170. doi: 10.3892/ijo.11.6.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Agarwal ML, Agarwal A, Taylor WR, Stark GR. p53 controls both the G2/M and the G1 cell-cycle checkpoints and mediates reversible growth arrest in human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:8493–8497. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hermeking H, et al. 14-3-3 sigma is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M progression. Mol Cell. 1997;1:3–11. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80002-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang XW, et al. GADD45 induction of a G2/M cell cycle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3706–3711. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Blagosklonny MV, Iglesias A, Zhan Z, Fojo T. Like p53, the proliferation-associated protein p120 accumulates in human cancer cells following exposure to anticancer drugs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;244:368–373. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1998.8278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ueda H, et al. FR901228, a novel antitumor bicyclic depsipeptide produced by Chromobacterium violaceum No. 968. Antitumor activities on experimental tumors in mice. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 1994;47:315–323. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.47.315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nakajima H, Kim YB, Terano H, Yoshida M, Horinouchi S. FR901228, a potent antitumor antibiotic, is a novel histone deacetylase inhibitor. Exp Cell Res. 1998;241:126–133. doi: 10.1006/excr.1998.4027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fisher DE. Apoptosis in cancer therapy: crossing the threshold. Cell. 1994;78:539–542. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90518-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kastan MB, Canman CE, Leonard CJ. P53, cell cycle control and apoptosis: implications for cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1995;14:3–15. doi: 10.1007/BF00690207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kaelin WGJ. Choosing anticancer drug targets in the postgenomic era. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:1503–1506. doi: 10.1172/JCI8888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shapiro GI, Harper JW. Anticancer drug targets: cell cycle and checkpoint control. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:1645–1653. doi: 10.1172/JCI9054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sellers WR, Fisher DE. Apoptosis and cancer drug targeting. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:1655–1661. doi: 10.1172/JCI9053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yu DH, et al. Overexpression of ErbB2 blocks taxol-induced apoptosis by upregulation of p21(Cip), which inhibits p34(Cdc2) kinase. Mol Cell. 1998;2:581–591. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80157-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Barboule N, Chadebech P, Baldin V, Vidal S, Valette A. Involvement of p21 in mitotic exit after paclitaxel treatment in MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cell lines. Oncogene. 1997;15:2867–2875. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Li W, Fan J, Banerjee D, Bertino JR. Overexpression of p21(waf1) decreases G2-M arrest and apoptosis induced by paclitaxel in human sarcoma cells lacking both p53 and functional Rb protein. Mol Pharmacol. 1999;55:1088–1093. doi: 10.1124/mol.55.6.1088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stewart ZA, Mays D, Pietenpol JA. Defective G1-S cell cycle checkpoint function sensitizes cells to microtubule inhibitor-induced apoptosis. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3831–3837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]