Abstract
Mutations in Notch3 cause CADASIL (cerebral autosomal dominant adult onset arteriopathy), which leads to stroke and dementia in humans. CADASIL arteriopathy is characterized by major alterations of vascular smooth muscle cells and the presence of specific granular osmiophilic deposits. Patients carry highly stereotyped mutations that lead to an odd number of cysteine residues within EGF-like repeats of the Notch3 receptor extracellular domain. Such mutations may alter the processing or the trafficking of this receptor, or may favor its oligomerization. In this study, we examined the Notch3 expression pattern in normal tissues and investigated the consequences of mutations on Notch3 expression in transfected cells and CADASIL brains. In normal tissues, Notch3 expression is restricted to vascular smooth muscle cells. Notch3 undergoes a proteolytic cleavage leading to a 210-kDa extracellular fragment and a 97-kDa intracellular fragment. In CADASIL brains, we found evidence of a dramatic and selective accumulation of the 210-kDa Notch3 cleavage product. Notch3 accumulates at the cytoplasmic membrane of vascular smooth muscle cells, in close vicinity to but not within the granular osmiophilic material. These results strongly suggest that CADASIL mutations specifically impair the clearance of the Notch3 ectodomain, but not the cytosolic domain, from the cell surface.
Introduction
We recently established that mutations in Notch3 cause CADASIL, a cerebral autosomal dominant adult onset arteriopathy which leads to stroke and dementia in humans (1–4). This condition is underlaid by an arteriopathy that affects mainly the small cerebral arteries. It is characterized by prominent alterations of vascular smooth muscle cells that eventually disappear, and the presence, on ultrastructural analysis, of rounded granular osmiophilic material located in close vicinity to the basement membrane of these cells (5–7). So far the nature of this material remains unknown.
Notch3 belongs to the family of highly conserved Notch/LIN-12 receptors, which includes 4 members in vertebrates (8). It encodes a protein of 2,321 amino acids that includes all canonical Notch motifs, i.e., an extracellular domain containing 34 tandem EGF-like repeats, 3 cysteine-rich Notch/LIN-12 repeats, a single transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain containing 6 tandem ankyrin repeats. All CADASIL mutations lead to the addition or the loss of a cysteine residue within a given EGF domain, and therefore to an odd number of cysteine residues, because an EGF domain contains an invariant number of 6 cysteine residues (9). Such mutations might alter the overall conformation of the Notch3 receptor, or prevent its processing and targeting to the cell surface. Indeed, it is now established that Notch1 and Notch2 receptors are constitutively cleaved between the LIN-12 repeats and the transmembrane domain, in the trans-Golgi network. The resulting cleavage products, which include the extracellular and the intracellular domains, are associated and carried to the cell surface to form a heterodimeric receptor (10, 11). Alternatively, these mutations might favor abnormal oligomerization of the Notch3 protein.
Examination of the Notch3 expression pattern has been conducted primarily during development in rodents. Notch3 is expressed during gastrulation and in the developing central nervous system; expression appears to be strongly downregulated in the postnatal period (12–14). Northern blot analysis indicates that Notch3 is ubiquitously expressed in human adult tissues, but is barely detectable in the brain (A. Joutel, unpublished results).
In this study, we examined the Notch3 expression pattern in various human adult tissues from control individuals using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry, and found that it was restricted to vascular smooth muscle cells. We then investigated the consequences of mutations on Notch3 expression in transfected cells and in CADASIL brains by immunohistochemical and immunoblot analyses. In CADASIL patients, there was a dramatic accumulation, within the brain vasculature, of the 210-kDa Notch3 cleavage product including the extracellular domain. Immunoelectron microscopy indicated that Notch3 accumulated at the cytoplasmic membrane of vascular smooth muscle cells, within highly restricted areas located in close vicinity to the granular osmiophilic material.
Methods
Control individuals.
Samples of various parenchyma were obtained at autopsy (10 individuals aged 3 months to 84 years) or at surgery (3 individuals, 36–53 years old). Tissues were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin fixative and embedded in paraffin. Tissues from 3 individuals were frozen and stored at –80°C.
CADASIL patients.
Brain tissue was obtained at autopsy (8 individuals, 49–66 years old) or at surgery (1 individual, 54 years old). All these patients belong to a CADASIL pedigree in which a pathogenic mutation has been identified: R153C (n°1 and n°2), R169C (n°3), R90C (n°4), R182C (n°5), R141C (n°6 and n°9), R110C (n°7), and deletion of 7 amino acids including C117 (n°8) (ref. 9 and A. Joutel and E. Tournier-Lasserve, unpublished results). Brain fragments (patients 1–8) were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin fixative for 48 hours to several years and then embedded in paraffin or frozen (patients 1, 8, and 9) and stored at –80°C.
IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION.
Sense and antisense 35S-labeled RNA probes were synthesized from 2 human Notch3 cDNAs. HN3X cNDA (nucleotides 3184–5490) encodes all or part of the last 8 EGF repeats and the 2 first ankyrin repeats; SHB1 cDNA (nucleotides 5851–7055) encodes all or part of the last 2 ankyrin repeats and the COOH-terminal intracellular region; Notch3 nucleotide numbering is according to the European Molecular Biology Laboratory, U97669. In situ hybridization was performed on 7-μm paraffin sections according to a previously published protocol (15). Three to 8 sections of each sample were examined with dark-field and bright-field illumination on a Leica DMR microscope.
Generation of antibodies that specifically recognize Notch3.
Histidine-tagged fusion proteins corresponding to EGF repeats 17–21 (amino acids 657–846) and the nonconserved intracellular epitope (amino acids 2117–2244) of the human Notch3 protein were prepared from Sf9 insect cells infected with recombinant baculoviruses. Fusion proteins were purified over Ni2+ agarose beads and then injected into rabbits for the production of polyclonal antibodies, and into mice for the production of monoclonal antibodies. Polyclonal sera and hybridoma supernatants were screened on cells transfected with the full-length human Notch3 cDNA by Western blot and immunofluorescence. Positive antibodies were further examined for their absence of cross-reactivity with Notch1 and Notch2 using transfected cells.
Immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5-μm paraffin sections. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-Notch3 extracellular domain (1E4 and 2E11 hybridoma supernatant, 1:5 dilution); anti-Notch3 intracellular domain (6A10 hybridoma supernatant, 1:2 dilution); anti–smooth muscle α-actin (1A4; DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) (1:100 dilution); anti–smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (hSM-V; Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) (1:1000 dilution); and anti–vascular endothelial cell antigen CD34 (QBEND10; Immunotech S.A., Marseilles, France) (1:50 dilution). Immunoreactivity was revealed with biotinylated horse anti-mouse antibody and avidin/biotin horseradish peroxidase complex (VECTASTAIN ABC-HRP kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlington, California, USA), and was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Steinheim, Germany). Sections were examined on a Leica DMR microscope.
Tissue extracts and Western blotting.
Tissue was homogenized in a solution containing 10 mM Tris-Cl, 150 mM NaCl, and protease inhibitors (Complete; Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Whole lysate was prepared by further solubilization of the homogenate in 2× SDS-Laemmli buffer (4% SDS, 317 mmol 2-mercaptoethanol [βME]). In some experiments, a centrifugation step performed at 16,000 g was added to allow crude separation of cytosolic proteins (supernatant) from noncytosolic proteins enriched in membrane proteins; the resulting pellet was resuspended in 8% sucrose, 100 mM NaCl, and 30 mM imidazole (pH 6.8) with protease inhibitors. Proteins in each fraction were further solubilized in 2× SDS-Laemmli buffer and then heated for 30 minutes at 45°C. Samples adjusted to 1× SDS-Laemmli buffer were run on a 6% SDS-PAGE gel and were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Immunodetection was performed by sequential incubations with anti-Notch3 antibody and horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, Pennsylvania, USA) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence detection (ECL; Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Illinois, USA).
RT-PCR.
Reverse-transcribed products prepared from brain total RNA were amplified using Notch3 primers derived from exons 30 and 33. PCR products were hybridized with an oligonucleotide probe derived from exon 30. Primers and oligonucleotide probes derived from the human porphobilinogen deaminase gene were used as controls. Scanned autoradiographs were quantitated with the public domain NIH Image program available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image.
Electron microscopy.
Electron microscopy was performed on tissue fixed in glutaraldehyde and embedded in Epon (Fluka Chemie, Buchs, Switzerland) according to standard procedures. Immunoelectron microscopy was performed on 7-μm paraffin sections with the 1E4 hybridoma supernatant (1:2 dilution). Staining was done with a goat anti-mouse antibody linked to colloidal gold particles (∼5 nm) followed by silver enhancement (Amersham, Buckingshire, England). Procedures for immunoelectron microscopy were as described (16). Micrographs were recorded on a Phillips EM 201 electron microscope.
Cell culture, transfection, and extract preparation.
A full-length Notch3 cDNA was assembled and cloned into the pSG5 expression vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, USA). Mutations R90C and C212S were introduced using mutagenic oligonucleotides. 293T cells were cultured in 6-well plates and were transiently transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation. Cell extracts were prepared as described (11).
Cell surface biotinylation.
Two days after transfection, cells were incubated with 2 mg/mL sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce Chemical Co.) as described (10). Cells were then washed and lysed in RIPA buffer and were incubated with streptavidin-agarose beads overnight at 4°C. Bound proteins were eluted with 2× SDS-Laemmli buffer, after which they were heated at 100°C and subjected to 6% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-Notch3 antibodies 5E1 and 5G7.
Immunoprecipitation.
Two days after transfection, cells were lysed in 0.5% Triton X-100 buffer containing protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitations were carried out with the BC2 and BC4 polyclonal anti-Notch3 antibodies and a preimmune rabbit serum.
Results
Notch3 expression is restricted to vascular smooth muscle cells in human adult tissues.
We investigated the Notch3 expression pattern in a broad panel of human adult tissues from control individuals (n = 13), using both in situ hybridization (n = 7) and immunohistochemistry (n = 10). To avoid cross-hybridization with Notch1, Notch2, and Notch4 transcripts, we designed 2 sets of both sense and anti-sense riboprobes from regions of the Notch3 gene showing the lowest homology with these transcripts. Examination of sections of various parenchyma (Figure 1), including heart (a–c), kidney (d–f), brain (g–i), large artery (j–l), skeletal muscle, lung, urinary bladder, and large intestine (data not shown) from at least 2 distinct individuals per tissue indicated that Notch3 expression is restricted to the vasculature. The 2 antisense Notch3 riboprobes showed the same hybridization pattern (data not shown).
Restriction of expression to the vasculature was confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis on paraffin sections with 2 anti-Notch3 antibodies that we raised against the extracellular domain, 1E4 and 2E11. Notch3 expression was further restricted to the smooth muscle cell layer within the vessels (Figure 1, o–q). Specificity of Notch3 immunoreactivity was confirmed by the control step of omitting each primary antibody (Figure 1m) and replacing it with an isotype-matched antibody (Figure 1r).
Anti-Notch3 antibodies raised against extracellular epitopes display an intense and granular immunoreactivity in CADASIL brains.
Using the 1E4 anti-Notch3 monoclonal antibody raised against an extracellular epitope, we found a prominent increase and a granular appearance of Notch3 immunoreactivity in the vascular smooth muscle cells in CADASIL brains (n = 8) (Figure 2, b, d, f, and h) that contrasted with the weak and homogeneous staining in control brains (n = 5) (Figure 2, a, c, e, and g). Notch3 staining was specific based on 2 things: the absence of staining of vascular smooth muscle cells in the absence of primary antibody (Figure 2i) or in the presence of an isotype-matched antibody (Figure 2j); and the similarity of results obtained with 2E11, another anti-Notch3 antibody raised against an extracellular epitope (Figure 2l). This intense Notch3 immunoreactivity was observed in all vessels, including arteries, veins, and capillaries throughout CADASIL brain parenchyma, and was detected both in vascular smooth muscle cells (Figure 2, b, d, and f) and pericytes (Figure 2h), leading to a stippled decoration of the brain parenchyma. These data strongly suggested an abnormal accumulation of the Notch3 receptor.
In contrast, using the 6A10 anti-Notch3 monoclonal antibody raised against an intracellular epitope, we found only weak immunoreactivity in the vascular smooth muscle cells in CADASIL brains, equivalent to that observed in control brains (data not shown).
Wild-type Notch3 is cleaved, producing 210-kDa and 97-kDa fragments.
Discrepancy between immunostaining patterns obtained with the anti-intracellular and anti-extracellular Notch3 antibodies, and the possibility that Notch3 undergoes a proteolytic cleavage similar to that experienced by the other Notch receptors raised the question of the nature of the Notch3 immunoreactive material that accumulates in CADASIL brains. As a first step, we investigated the processing of the wild-type Notch3 receptor.
293T cells transfected with the full-length wild-type Notch3 cDNA expressed the full-length Notch3 precursor (∼280 kDa) detected both by 5G7 (anti-intracellular) and 5E1 (anti-extracellular) anti-Notch3 antibodies, as well as proteins of approximately 97 kDa and 210 kDa detected by 5G7 and 5E1 antibodies, respectively (Figure 3, a and b). Coimmunoprecipitation experiments provided evidence that the 97-kDa and the 210-kDa cleavage products were associated (Figure 3c).
In control tissues, Notch3 was detected in extracts from arteries, including leptomeningeal, large cerebral, and extracerebral arteries, but not from brain parenchyma (Figure 3b and data not shown). The latter finding is probably explained by the weak expression level of this receptor and by the fact that smooth muscle cells and pericytes represent a minor cellular population within the brain parenchyma. Arteries expressed the 210-kDa and the 97-kDa fragments, but not the 280-kDa full-length protein (Figure 3b). These data strongly suggested that Notch3 undergoes a proteolytic cleavage identical to that of the Notch1 and Notch2 receptors.
Dramatic and selective accumulation of the 210-kDa Notch3 cleavage product in CADASIL patients.
To further confirm Notch3 accumulation in CADASIL brains, and to investigate the nature of the Notch3 immunoreactive material, we performed Western blot analysis on lysates from CADASIL tissues. In CADASIL brains (n = 3), the 5E1 and 11A1 anti-extracellular antibodies detected a prominent 210-kDa protein; under the same experimental conditions using control brains (n = 2), Notch3 protein was not detected (Figure 4, a and b). The size of the Notch3 immunoreactive material that accumulated in CADASIL brains was identical to the 210-kDa Notch3 cleavage product, including the extracellular domain detected in Notch3-transfected cells and in control arterial tissue (Figure 4, a–c).
By contrast, both the 5G7 monoclonal antibody and the BC4 polyclonal anti-intracellular antibody failed to detect any signal in CADASIL brains, even though the 97-kDa fragment was detected successfully on the same Western blot in a control artery (Figure 4c and not shown). When using arterial tissues (considerably enriched in vascular smooth muscle cells) from either a control individual or a CADASIL patient, both 210-kDa and 97-kDa Notch3 cleavage products were detected. Comparative analysis of the relative amounts of the 210-kDa and 97-kDa proteins provided strong evidence of the accumulation of the 210-kDa fragment in the CADASIL patient. By contrast, an almost equivalent amount of the 97-kDa fragment was observed in both the control subject and a CADASIL patient. This 97-kDa fragment was of similar size in control and CADASIL arteries (Figure 4d).
The mutant Notch3 ectodomain probably undergoes an improper oligomerization.
To investigate whether the odd number of cysteines in mutant Notch3 might favor its improper oligomerization and contribute to its accumulation, we performed Western blot analysis on lysates from CADASIL brains under nonreducing conditions with the 5E1 antibody. No band was detected in the CADASIL brain (Figure 4e, βME–) under these conditions, even though a prominent quantity of Notch3 protein was detected under reducing conditions (Figure 4e, βME+). These results strongly suggested that in the absence of reducing agents, it is likely that mutant Notch3 consists of large complexes that were unable to enter the SDS-PAGE gel. Under nonreducing conditions, the artery from a control individual, used as a positive control, expressed a band of approximately 280 kDa that may correspond to the tightly associated extracellular and intracellular cleavage products (Figure 4e, βME+), as reported previously for Notch1 (17).
Equivalent proteolytic processing and subcellular distribution of wild-type and mutated Notch3 proteins in 293T cells transfected with the wild-type and mutant Notch3 cDNAs.
To further explore the mechanisms by which the Notch3 ectodomain abnormally accumulated, we examined the subcellular distribution of wild -type and mutant Notch3 (R90C and C212S) in 293T cells transfected with the wild-type or the mutant Notch3 cDNAs. Wild-type Notch3 protein was detected within the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi apparatus, and at the cell surface by immunofluorescence analysis (not shown). The 97-kDa and the 210-kDa cleavage products of the wild-type Notch3 were the major species detected at the cell surface using biotin labeling of surface proteins (Figure 5 and not shown). We found that proteolytic processing and subcellular distribution of mutant Notch3 were both equivalent to those of the wild-type Notch3 (Figure 5 and not shown). Furthermore, we did not obtain evidence of an abnormal accumulation of the 210-kDa cleavage product in 293T cells transfected with the mutant Notch3 cDNAs.
Notch3 accumulates at the cytoplasmic membrane of vascular smooth muscle cells in close vicinity to the granular osmiophilic deposits.
To search further for the subcellular compartment where Notch3 accumulated and to investigate whether Notch3 accumulation might account for the granular osmiophilic deposits, we performed immunoelectron microscopy analysis on sections from a CADASIL brain. Notch3 immunolabeling was detected at the cytoplasmic membrane of vascular smooth muscle cells (Figure 6). It was highly restricted to small areas located close to the granular osmiophilic deposits, which themselves were not labeled by the anti-Notch3 antibody .
Discussion
Notch3 expression is restricted to vascular smooth muscle cells in human adult tissues.
The restricted expression pattern we observed in human adult tissues was quite unexpected because it is in sharp contrast with the broad pattern reported in rodents during the early stages of development (12–14). Nevertheless, when we reinvestigated Notch3 expression in late-stage murine embryos (embryonic day 16.5), we found a similar profile that was highly restricted to the vasculature (A. Joutel, unpublished results). The expression pattern of Notch3 suggests some hypotheses regarding its putative role in adult tissues. Other Notch proteins have been shown to block cell differentiation or to otherwise control cell fate. Vascular smooth muscle cells, which are mature but non–terminally differentiated cells, exhibit a remarkable phenotypic plasticity in response to a variety of stimuli (18). One can speculate that the Notch3 signaling pathway may be involved in the phenotypic modulation of these cells and determining whether they retain a differentiated contractile phenotype or adopt an undifferentiated proliferative phenotype.
Dramatic accumulation of Notch3 in the cerebrovasculature of CADASIL patients.
Our results provide convincing evidence of prominent accumulation, in the cerebrovasculature of CADASIL patients, of the 210-kDa proteolytic cleavage product that corresponds to the ectodomain of the Notch3 receptor. In addition, we established that this accumulation takes place at the cytoplasmic membrane of vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes. Two possibilities may account for this finding: increased production of Notch3, or impaired clearance of the Notch3 receptor from the cell surface. Because we found that relative amounts of Notch3 mRNA were essentially identical in both CADASIL and control individuals (data not shown), the first possibility seems very unlikely. Improper oligomerization of the mutant Notch3 ectodomain, strongly suggested by our data, probably contributes to its impaired clearance.
Unexpectedly, immunoelectron microscopy revealed that Notch3 accumulation did not take place within the characteristic granular osmiophilic material, but occurred in close vicinity to it. Whether and how the Notch3 ectodomain and the accumulation of this material are mechanistically linked remains to be investigated.
The next important challenge will be to determine whether CADASIL mutations lead to inhibition — or alternatively, activation — of the Notch3 signaling pathway. Proteolytic cleavage and nuclear translocation of the intracellular domain of Notch receptors have recently been linked to receptor signaling (19–21). In CADASIL brains, Notch3 intracellular domain was not detected in the nucleus. Immunoblot analysis of CADASIL arterial tissue provided no evidence of an additional proteolytic cleavage of the 97-kDa protein. However, no definite conclusion can presently be drawn from these negative results, because activation of the Notch signaling pathway has been reported to occur with a very small amount (below the level of detection) of nuclear Notch intracellular domain (19). Further work such as expression analysis of downstream target genes and in vitro experiments should help in addressing this important issue. Another important issue will be to determine whether Notch3 accumulation occurs in a ligand-dependent or ligand-independent context. This will require, as a first step, identification of Notch3 ligands that are so far unknown.
Implications for CADASIL diagnosis.
Detection of granular osmiophilic material typical of CADASIL requires ultrastructural analysis, which is an intensive and time-consuming procedure. Furthermore, mutational scanning of the Notch3 gene is hampered by the large number of exons requiring analysis (9). In this study, we established that CADASIL mutations cause a pronounced accumulation of Notch3, leading to a characteristic immunostaining pattern in CADASIL tissues. Recent results from our lab indicate that Notch3 accumulation is also detected in many other parenchymal tissues, including muscle and skin obtained from biopsy (A. Joutel et al., unpublished observations). Therefore, we propose that Notch3 antibodies could be useful for diagnostic CADASIL screening procedures.
Our results indicate that vascular smooth muscle cells are the primary target in the cascade of events leading from Notch3 mutations to the CADASIL arteriopathy. Determining the role of Notch3 should ultimately allow elucidation of whether and how Notch3 mutations cause vascular smooth muscle cell alterations.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank M.G. Bousser (Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France); B. Dubois, J.J. Hauw, H. Beaufils, and V. Sazdowitch (Centre Hospitaler Universitaire [CHU], Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France); D. Leys and M.M. Ruchoux (CHU, Lille, France); M. Baudrimont (Hôpital St Antoine, Paris, France); F. Berthelet (Campus Notre-Dame, Montréal, Quebec, Canada); P. Davous (Centre Hospitaler Victor Dupuy, Argenteuil, France); C. Fallet-Bianco (Hôpital Ste. Anne, Paris, France); P. Burkhardt and G.P. Pizzolato (Hôpital Universitaire, Genève, Geneva, Switzerland); M.C. Gubbler (CHU Necker Enfants-Malades, Paris, France); J. Mikol (Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris, France); and G. Tietjen (Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA) for referring patients and making autopsy tissues available. We thank S. Artavanis-Tsakonas (Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA) for the full-length Notch1 and Notch2 plasmids and monoclonal antibodies against Notch1 (bTAN20) and Notch2 (bHn6), and E. McIntyre (Hôpital Necker, Paris, France) for providing Porphobilinogen deaminase primers. We are indebted to J.M. Gasc (U 36, Collège de France, Paris, France) for teaching us the in situ hybridization protocol, and to C. Berthelin for technical assistance with electron microscopy.
Support for this work was provided by grants from INSERM, from the Association Française contre les Myopathies, and from bioMérieux.
References
- 1.Joutel A, et al. Notch3 mutations in CADASIL, an hereditary adult-onset condition causing stroke and dementia. Nature. 1996;383:707–710. doi: 10.1038/383707a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tournier-Lasserve E, Iba-Zizen MT, Romero N, Bousser MG. Autosomal dominant syndrome with stroke-like episodes and leukoencephalopathy. Stroke. 1991;22:1297–1302. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.10.1297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tournier-Lasserve E, et al. Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy maps to chromosome 19q12. Nat Genet. 1993;3:256–259. doi: 10.1038/ng0393-256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chabriat H, et al. Clinical spectrum of CADASIL: a study of 7 families. Lancet. 1995;346:934–939. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91557-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Baudrimont M, Dubas F, Joutel A, Tournier-Lasserve E, Bousser MG. Autosomal dominant leukoencephalopathy and subcortical ischemic stroke. A clinicopathological study. Stroke. 1993;24:122–125. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ruchoux MM, et al. Systematic vascular smooth muscle cell impairment in cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1995;89:500–512. doi: 10.1007/BF00571504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ruchoux MM, Maurage CA. CADASIL: cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:947–964. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Artavanis-Tsakonas S, Rand MD, Lake RJ. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science. 1999;284:770–776. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5415.770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Joutel A, et al. Strong clustering and stereotyped nature of Notch3 mutations in CADASIL patients. Lancet. 1997;350:1511–1515. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08083-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Blaumueller CM, Qi H, Zagouras P, Artavanis-Tsakonas S. Extracellular cleavage of Notch leads to a heterodimeric receptor on the plasma membrane. Cell. 1997;90:281–291. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80336-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Logeat F, et al. The Notch1 receptor is cleaved constitutively by a furin-like convertase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:8108–8112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lardelli M, Dahlstrand J, Lendahl U. The novel Notch homologue mouse Notch3 lacks specific epidermal growth factor-repeats and is expressed in proliferating neuroepithelium. Mech Dev. 1994;46:123–136. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(94)90081-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Williams R, Lendahl U, Lardelli M. Complementary and combinatorial patterns of Notch genes family expression during early mouse development. Mech Dev. 1995;53:357–368. doi: 10.1016/0925-4773(95)00451-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lindsell CE, Boulter J, diSibio G, Gossler A, Weinmaster G. Expression patterns of Jagged1, Delta1, Notch1, Notch2, and Notch3 genes identify ligand-receptor pairs that may function in neural development. Mol Cell Neurosci. 1996;8:14–27. doi: 10.1006/mcne.1996.0040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sibony M, Commo F, Callard P, Gasc JM. Enhancement of mRNA in situ hybridization signal by microwave heating. Lab Invest. 1995;73:586–591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Caron A, Gohel C, Mollaret K, Morello R, Chapon F. Study of some components of the cytoskeleton in muscular disorders with non specific cytoplasmic bodies. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 1999;97:267–274. doi: 10.1007/s004010050984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ray WJ, et al. Evidence for a physical interaction between the presenilin and Notch. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:3263–3268. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Owens GK. Regulation of differentiation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Physiol Rev. 1995;75:487–517. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schroeter EH, Kisslinger JA, Kopan R. Notch-1 signalling required ligand-induced proteolytic release of intracellular domain. Nature. 1998;393:382–386. doi: 10.1038/30756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Struhl G, Adachi A. Nuclear access and action of Notch in vivo. Cell. 1998;93:649–660. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81193-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.De Strooper B, et al. A presenilin-1-dependent γ-secretase-like protease mediates release of Notch intracellular domain. Nature. 1999;398:518–521. doi: 10.1038/19083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]