Abstract
Two previously uncharacterized proteins have been identified that efficiently catalyze the deamination of isoxanthopterin and pterin-6-carboxylate. The genes encoding these two enzymes, NYSGXRC-9339a (gi|44585104) and NYSGXRC-9236b (gi|44611670), were first identified from DNA isolated from the Sargasso Sea as part of the Global Ocean Sampling Project. The genes were synthesized, and the proteins were subsequently expressed and purified. The X-ray structure of Sgx9339a was determined at 2.7 Å resolution (PDB code: 2PAJ). This protein folds as a distorted (β/α)8-barrel and contains a single zinc ion in the active site. These enzymes are members of the amidohydrolase superfamily and belong to cog0402 within the clusters of orthologous groups (COG). Enzymes in cog0402 have previously been shown to catalyze the deamination of guanine, cytosine, S-adenosyl homocysteine, and 8-oxoguanine. A small compound library of pteridines, purines, and pyrimidines was used to probe catalytic activity. The only substrates identified in this search were isoxanthopterin and pterin-6-carboxylate. The kinetic constants for the deamination of isoxanthopterin with Sgx9339a were determined to be 1.0 s−1, 8.0 μM, and 1.3 × 105 M−1 s−1 for kcat, Km, and kcat/Km, respectively. The active site of Sgx9339a most closely resembles the active site for 8-oxoguanine deaminase (PDB code: 2UZ9). A model for substrate recognition of isoxanthopterin by Sgx9339a was proposed based upon the binding of guanine and xanthine in the active site of guanine deaminase. Residues critical for substrate binding appear to be conserved glutamine and tyrosine residues that hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen at C4, a conserved threonine residue that hydrogen bonds with N5, and another conserved threonine residue that hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl group at C7. These conserved active site residues were used to identify 24 other genes which are predicted to deaminate isoxanthopterin.
High throughput DNA sequencing efforts have substantially increased the number of fully sequenced bacterial genomes and our understanding of the enzymes contained within these organisms. A critical assessment of the corresponding protein sequences reveals that a significant fraction of these enzymes has not been functionally annotated or are incorrectly annotated as catalyzing the wrong reactions. Misannotated functional assignments are likely due to an overreliance on automated homology-based sequence comparisons that are not substantiated by active site analysis and experimental verification. The ever increasing number of putative enzymes for which the function(s) are unknown further suggests that many metabolic and catabolic pathways remain to be discovered. Our efforts to develop comprehensive strategies for annotating enzymes of unknown function have focused on the amidohydrolase superfamily (1-10).
The amidohydrolase superfamily (AHS1) was first recognized by Sander and Holm based upon the structural similarities of urease, phosphotriesterase, and adenosine deaminase (11). Enzymes within this superfamily catalyze hydrolytic reactions of amide and ester bonds contained within carbohydrates, peptides, and nucleic acids (12). Less common amidohydrolasecatalyzed reactions include decarboxylations, hydrations, and isomerizations (3, 13-17). Active sites of enzymes within the AHS contain a binuclear or mononuclear metal center that activates a hydrolytic water molecule and/or the substrate for nucleophilic attack. Over 12,000 unique protein sequences have been identified as members of the AHS within the genomes of the first 1,000 completely sequenced bacteria deposited in the NCBI. Contained within the AHS are 24 clusters of orthologous groups (COG).
One of the largest of these clusters with more than 1,000 members is the group of proteins within cog0402. A network representation of the sequence relationships for cog0402 at a BLAST e-value cutoff of 10−70 is presented in Figure 1 (18). All of the functionally annotated enzymes within this COG catalyze deamination reactions including guanine deaminase (subcluster 2), cytosine deaminase (subcluster 6), S-adenosyl homocysteine/thiomethyl adenosine deaminase (subcluster 1), and N-formimino-L-glutamate deiminase (subcluster 8). In addition, we have recently demonstrated that the majority of enzymes found within subcluster 4 catalyze the deamination of 8-oxoguanine to urate (19). The catalytic functions for the remaining subclusters within cog0402 remain uncharacterized.
The structural determinants of 8-oxoguanine deaminase in subcluster 4 are a conserved glutamine and tyrosine which occur in the loops at the C-termini of β-strands 1 and 2, respectively, and a conserved Cys-Ser dyad found at the C-terminus of β-strand 4 within a (β/α)8-barrel structural fold. In the subcluster of enzymes that catalyze the deamination of guanine, the Cys-Ser dyad is replaced with an Arg-Phe pair. Curiously, at the periphery of subcluster 4 is a group of sequences (colored blue in Figure 1) with a Thr-Thr dyad. This paper describes the discovery of function for this group of enzymes.
Two enzymes interrogated for this investigation were prepared for crystallization as part of the NIH-sponsored Protein Structure Initiative (PSI) by the New York SGX Research Center for Structural Genomics (NYSGXRC). The two targets, Sgx9236b and Sgx9339a, were derived from environmental DNA sequences isolated from bacteria in the Sargasso Sea under the Global Ocean Sampling Project. The closest homologue to Sgx9339a (88% identical) is Bxe_A2016 from Burkholderia xenovorans LB400 and the closest homologue of Sgx9236b (95% identical) is Bphyt_7136 from Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN. Both of these proteins are currently annotated by NCBI as ATZ/TRZ-like amidohydrolases. The three-dimensional structure of Sgx9339a was determined at 2.7 Å resolution. Using a combination of compound library screening and structural comparisons, we have determined that both of these enzymes catalyze the deamination of isoxanthopterin to 7-oxylumazine.
Materials and Methods
Materials
All chemicals and buffers were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich unless specified otherwise. 8-Oxoguanine was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals Inc. Kinetic assays were performed in 96-well microtiter plates with a SPECTRAmax 384 Plus spectrophotometer from Molecular Devices. Compounds tested for enzymatic activity with Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b included isoxanthopterin, pterin-6-carboxylate, D-erythro-neopterin, 6-biopterin, 6,7-dimethylpterin, pterin, 8-oxoguanine, guanine, acycloguanosine, isocytosine, cytosine, folate, 2,4-diamino-6-hydroxymethylpteridine, GTP, GDP, GMP, guanosine, 3′,5′-cGMP, 2′-dGTP, 7-methylguanosine, 7-methylguanine, 2′-deoxyguanosine, melamine, ammeline, 5-azacytosine, isoguanine, creatinine, thiamine, cytidine, 2-deoxycytidine, 5-fluorocytosine, 5-methylcytosine, 3-oxauracil, CTP, CDP, CMP, cytosine arabinoside, cytidine-5′-diphosphocholine, dCTP, dCTP, dCMP, 3′,5′-cCMP, 3′-CMP, 2′,3′-cCMP, 5-methyl-2′-deoxycytidine, adenine, 7-methyladenine, 2′-deoxyadenosine, ATP, ADP, AMP, 3′,5′-cAMP, and thiomethyl adenosine.
Protein Expression and Purification
The sequences of Sgx9339a (gi|44585104) and Sgx9236b (gi|44611670) were obtained from the Global Ocean Sampling Project. The target selection processes for structure determination are described in Pieper et al. (6). Codon-optimized synthetic DNA (Codon Devices, Inc.) was used as a template and cloned into a custom TOPO-isomerase vector, pSGX3(BC), supplied by Invitrogen. Forward and reverse primers for Sgx9339a were ACCACGTATGATACCCAGCC and CTACCACAACTTCGCGCAAGAGC, and for Sgx9236b were CAGACCGAAGCGCTGTTAATTA and CATCCGCTAACAACTGTTTAACCC, respectively. The clone encodes Met-Ser-Leu followed by the PCR product and then Glu-Gly-His6. Miniprep DNA was transformed into BL21(DE3)-Codon+RIL expression cells (Stratagene), expressed, and made into a 30% glycerol stock for large scale fermentation.
Expression clones of Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b were cultured using ZYP-5052 auto-induction media (William Studier, Brookhaven National Laboratory). Overnight cultures were prepared from glycerol stocks that were derived from fresh transformants in LB media. The following morning, overnight cultures were used to inoculate ZYP-5052 auto-induction media. A 5-10% inoculum was achieved by adding 12-25 mL of overnight culture to 250 mL ZYP-5052 media containing 90 γg/mL kanamycin and 30 γg/mL chloramphenicol in a 2 L baffled shake flask. Cultures were grown at 37 °C for 5 hours at 225 rpm agitation. The temperature was then switched to 22 °C and the cells grown overnight for 18 hours to allow for induction of the intended protein. Selenomethionine-labeled protein was produced for Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b using High Yield SeMet media (Orion Enterprises, Inc, Northbrook, IL). Cells were harvested using standard centrifugation for 10 minutes at 6000 rpm and frozen at −80 °C.
Cells were lysed in 20 mM TRIS pH 8.0, 0.5 M NaCl, 25 mM imidazole, and 0.1% Tween 20 by sonication. The cellular debris was removed by centrifugation for 30 minutes (39,800 μ g). The supernatant was collected and incubated with 10 mL of a 50% slurry of NiNTA Agarose (Qiagen) for 30 minutes with gentle stirring. The sample was then poured into a drip column and washed with 50 mL of wash buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 500 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 25 mM imidazole) to remove unbound proteins. The protein of interest was eluted using 25 mL of elution buffer (wash buffer with 500 mM imidazole). Fractions containing the protein were pooled and further purified by gel filtration chromatography on a GE Healthcare HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 prep grade column pre-equilibrated with gel filtration buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol and 5 mM DTT). Fractions containing the protein of interest were combined and concentrated to 10 mg/mL by centrifugation in an Amicon Ultra-15 10,000 Da MWCO centrifugal filter unit. Electrospray mass spectrometry was used to obtain an accurate mass of the protein purified to confirm its identity. The expression plasmids (NYSGXRC clone ID 9339a2BCt7p1 and 9236b2BCt11p1) are available through the PSI Material Repository (http://psimr.asu.edu/), and the DNA sequences and experimental details are available in the Protein Expression Purification and Crystallization Database (PepcDB) as TargetID “NYSGXRC-9339a” and “NYSGXRC-9236b”.
Crystallization, Data Collection and Structure Determination
Diffraction quality crystals of the seleno-methionine form of Sgx9339a were obtained in the trigonal space group P3121 at room temperature via vapor diffusion against a reservoir solution containing 0.1 M MES, pH 6.5, 12% (w/v) PEG 20000, (1 μL of reservoir solution plus 1 μL of protein at 20 mg/mL). Crystals were frozen by direct immersion in liquid nitrogen using the mother liquor with 15% (v/v) glycerol added. X-ray diffraction data were collected under standard cryogenic conditions at Beamline X29 (National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory) and were reduced, merged, and scaled using HKL2000 (20). The Matthews coefficient was calculated to be 3.45 Å3/Da assuming one molecule/asymmetric unit. Data collection and refinement statistics are provided in Table 1. The presence of zinc was confirmed by absorption edge scanning at the NSLS beamline.
Table 1.
Data collection statistics: | |
Wavelength (Å) | 0.9792 |
Resolution (Å) | 50-2.7 |
Space group | P3121 |
Unit Cell dimensions | a = 88.9, b = 88.9, c = 161.9, α = β = 90°, γ = 120° |
Diffraction protocol | Single wavelength anomalous dispersion |
Molecules /asymmetric unit | 1 |
Redundancy (overall/outermost shell) | 19 (10.5) |
I/σ (I) | 11.1(2.5) |
outermost shell (Å) | 2.8 – 2.7 |
Rmerge (overall/outmost shell) | 0.07 (0.30) |
Completeness (%) (overall/outmost shell) | 94.4 (63) |
Number of Reflections | 19968 |
Refinement statistics: | |
Resolution range (Å) | 50-2.7 |
Number of reflections | 19173 |
Completeness (working + test) (%) | 91.6 |
Rfactor | 0.23 |
Rfree | 0.28 |
Number of protein atoms | 3194 |
Number of zinc ions | 1 |
Number of water molecules | 85 |
B Values | |
from Wilson plot (Å2) | 39.2 |
mean B value (overall, Å2) | 58.4 |
r.m.s.d. bonds (Å) | 0.009 |
r.m.s.d. angles (°) | 1.6 |
Ramachandran plot analysis: | |
Most favored region (additionally allowed) (%) | 82.5(16.1) |
Generously allowed region (disallowed) (%) | 1.1(0.3) |
All 13 internal (excluding N-terminal) selenium atoms were located using ShelxD (21), and used for phase refinement with SHARP (22) and density modification with SOLOMON (23). ARP/wARP (24) automatically built ~50% of the protein atomic model and the remainder of the structure was built manually with O (25) and subsequently refined with CNS (26) at 2.7 Å resolution.
Measurement of Enzymatic Activity
The assays for the detection of ammonia for the enzymatic deamination of pteridines, purines and pyrimidines were conducted with a 96-well UV/vis microplate spectrophotometer at 30 °C. Compounds in this putative substrate library were tested at a concentration of 1.0 mM, except for the pteridine derivatives and 8-oxoguanine, which were assayed at 0.1 mM owing to solubility limitations. The coupling system contained 7.4 mM α-ketoglutarate, 0.4 mM NADH, 6 units glutamate dehydrogenase, and 100 mM HEPES, pH 8.5, in a final volume of 0.25 mL. For direct product assays, extinction coefficients for the deamination of isoxanthopterin (Δε350 nm = 7654 M−1 cm−1) and pterin-6-carboxylate (Δε264 nm = 8080 M−1 cm−1) were determined from changes in the UV/vis absorption spectra after the deamination reaction was complete using substrate concentrations from 0.004-0.116 mM. Mass spectrometric analysis of product formation was performed by the Laboratory for Biological Mass Spectrometry (LBMS) in the Department of Chemistry at Texas A&M University.
Data Analysis
Sequence alignments were created using the ClustalW program at http://align.genome.jp/sit-bin/clustalw. Alignments were formatted using the Multiple Align Show program at http://www.bioinformatics.org/sms/. Steady-state kinetic data were analyzed using the program Softmax Pro version 4.7.1. For the determination of the kinetic parameters (kcat, Km and kcat/Km) the data were fit to equation 1 using the non-linear least squares fitting program SigmaPlot 10 where A is the substrate concentration, v is the velocity of the reaction, kcat is the turnover number and Km is the Michaelis constant.
(1) |
Results
Three-Dimensional Structure of Sgx9339a
The X-ray structure of Sgx9339a was determined to a resolution of 2.7 Å and a ribbon representation of an individual subunit is presented in Figure 2. The protein folds into two distinct domains. The larger of the two domains consists of a distorted (α/β)8-TIM barrel whereas the smaller domain is made up of the N-terminal residues 10-70 and residues 413-456, together making a β-sheet sandwich as illustrated in Figure 3. Interestingly, this amidohydrolase is higher in molecular weight than many of the other structurally characterized members of this superfamily and has an extra helical tail that is preceded by a loop comprised of residues 457-463. The helix (residues 464-484) is approximated to the large domain by salt bridge interactions between glutamate and arginine residues and hydophobic interactions at the interface. The opposite surface of the helix is positively charged, displaying five arginines and one lysine. The final refined model consists of residues 10-484, one zinc atom and 85 water molecules. Loop flexibility may have caused poor or no electron density for the loops consisting of residues 89-105, 251-263, 315-319 and 362-380. These residues were not modeled in the final structure.
The Active Site
The active center is located in the middle of the (β/α)8-barrel and is exposed to solvent as illustrated in Figure 4. There is a single zinc ion in the active site. This metal ion is coordinated to two histidine residues (His-76 and His-78) at the C-terminus of β-strand 1 and another histidine at the C-terminus of β-strand 5 (His-248). The remaining protein ligand to the metal center is an aspartate that follows β-strand 8 (Asp-336). The water molecule responsible for nucleophilic attack of the substrate occupies the final coordination site. This water molecule is hydrogen bonded to the side chain of His-285 (2.9 Å) positioned near the C-terminus of β-strand 6. The geometry of the mononuclear metal center is identical to that previously observed with guanine deaminase (PDB code: 2UZ9), cytosine deaminase (27) and adenosine deaminase (28). However, the catalytically important glutamate (Glu-251) found within the HxxE motif at the C-terminus of β-strand 5 is not observed, presumably due to conformational flexibility within the crystal.
Substrate Specificity
Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b were assayed with a small compound library of pteridines, purines and pyrimidines for deaminase activity. At a fixed enzyme concentration of ~100 nM, significant formation of ammonia could only be detected with isoxanthopterin (I) and pterin-6-carboxylate (II) as substrates. The reactions catalyzed by these enzymes are shown in Scheme 1.
The reaction products for the deamination of isoxanthopterin and pterin-6-carboxylate were verified by UV/vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The absorbance spectrum of isoxanthopterin (I) is presented in Figure 5. At pH 8.5, there are absorbance maxima at 281 and 333 nm (29). The spectrum changes after the addition of Sgx9339a and the absorbance maxima shift to 274 and 326 nm, which is consistent with the formation of 7-oxylumazine (29). The ESI negative ion mass spectrum for M-H of m/z = 178.04 from isoxanthopterin changed to m/z = 179.02 for 7-oxylumazine upon enzyme addition. The maximum absorbance difference between isoxanthopterin and 7-oxylumazine was determined to be at 350 nm with a Δε = 7650 M−1 cm−1. The kinetic constants for the deamination of isoxanthopterin with Sxg9339a and Sgx9236b were determined and the results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2.
enzyme | substrate | kcat (s−1) | Km (mM) | kcat/Km (M−1 s−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sgx9339a | isoxanthopterin | 1.05 ± 0.03 | 0.008 ± 0.001 | (1.3 ± 0.2) × 105 |
pterin-6-carboxylate | 1.01 ± 0.10 | 0.14 ± 0.02 | (7.2 ± 0.2) × 103 | |
Sgx9236b | isoxanthopterin | 0.91 ± 0.06 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | (1.8 ± 0.2) × 104 |
pterin-6-carboxylate | 0.28 ± 0.05 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | (3.1 ± 0.4) × 103 |
The absorbance spectrum for pterin-6-carboxylate at pH 8.5 is presented in Figure 5. In this spectrum there are absorbance maxima at 264 and 361 nm. After the addition of Sgx9339a the spectrum changes to one with absorbance maxima at 287 and 347 nm. The ESI negative ion mass spectrum for M-H of m/z = 206.03 from pterin-6-carboxylate changed to m/z = 207.02 for 2,4-dioxo-pteridine-6-carboxylate after enzyme addition. Direct kinetic assays were conducted at a wavelength of 264 nm with a Δε of 8080 M−1 cm−1. The kinetic constants for the deamination of pterin-6-carboxylate with Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b are presented in Table 2. For each enzyme the values of kcat/Km for the deamination of isoxanthopterin are about an order of magnitude greater than for pterin-6-carboxylate.
Discussion
Structural Neighbors to Sgx9339a
The vector alignment search tool (VAST) from NCBI identified two close structural hits to Sgx9339a. The most similar protein (PDB code: 3HPA) catalyzes the deamination of 8-oxoguanine to urate (19) and the other protein (PDB code: 1P1M) catalyzes the deamination of S-adenosyl homocysteine (5). These two proteins superimpose with 2PAJ with their Cα atoms of 389 and 374 residues with a Z-score: 49.6 and 43.5; rmsd: 1.8 and 2.5 Å; and 35 and 25% sequence identity, respectively. A stereoview of the structural alignments for these three proteins is presented in Figure 6. As expected, 2PAJ is structurally more similar to 3HPA in terms of loop size and arrangement, protein length, active site orientation, mononuclear metal center and the presence of the C-terminal helix. The primary difference in the active site structures is the presence of a threonine (Thr-220) in 2PAJ instead of the cysteine (Cys-232) in 3HPA. The structural alignment comparing the active sites contained within 2PAJ and 3HPA is presented in Figure 7. The helix-turn-helix region of 3HPA (residues 105-123), which acts as a lid for the active site, is disordered in 2PAJ (residues 89-105).
It has been shown that Sgx9339a preferentially catalyzes the deamination of isoxanthopterin to 7-oxylumazine with a kcat/Km value that exceeds 105 M−1 s−1. Although the structure of this enzyme has been determined it has thus far not been possible to obtain co-crystals that contain the substrate or product bound in the active site. How then is the substrate accommodated within the active site? One of the closest structural homologues to Sgx9339a in which a product or substrate is bound in the active site is human guanine deaminase complexed with the product xanthine (PDB code: 2UZ9). In that structure the carbonyl group at C6 of xanthine hydrogen bonds with Gln-87 and Arg-213. Arg-213 also interacts with N7. In addition to these recognition elements, Asp-330 and His-279 function together with the metal center to activate the hydrolytic water molecule, and Glu-243 serves as the ultimate proton donor to N1 during the transition from substrate to product. Shown in Figure 8a is a model of how guanine binds in the active site of human guanine deaminase.
The closest structural homologue to Sgx9339a is Sgx9236e (PDB code: 3HPA). This protein catalyzes the deamination of 8-oxoguanine (19). A ligand-bound structure has not been determined but a model for how the substrate for this enzyme binds in the active site has been developed based upon computational docking of potential high energy intermediates in the active site and direct structural comparisons with guanine deaminase (19). A model for the interaction of 8-oxoguanine in the active site of Sgx9236e is presented in Figure 8b. In this model a glutamine residue (Gln-98), homologous to Gln-87 in guanine deaminase, hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl group at C6, Tyr-155 also hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl group at C6, while Cys-232 and Ser-233 interact with the carbonyl group at C8. Asp-347, His-296, and Glu-262 function in concert to activate the hydrolytic water molecule and facilitate the various proton transfer reactions.
The structures of guanine deaminase (PDB code: 2UZ9) and 8-oxoguanine deaminase (PDB code: 3HPA) were used to rationalize the binding of isoxanthopterin in the active site of Sgx9339a (PDB code: 2PAJ). In this model the conserved glutamine (Gln-81) and tyrosine (Tyr-139) hydrogen bond with the carbonyl group at C4. One of the two conserved threonine residues (Thr-220) hydrogen bonds with N5 and the other conserved threonine (Thr-221) hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl group at C7. The catalytic triad, consisting of the conserved aspartate (Asp-336), histidine (His-285), and glutamate (Glu-251) are poised to facilitate the deamination reaction in the same fashion as the other functionally characterized enzymes in cog0402. However, Glu-251 cannot be positioned precisely because of conformational flexibility. In this model we have orientated this residue based upon the observed position of the homologous residue in guanine deaminase. The proposed interactions for the binding of isoxanthopterin in the active site of Sgx9339a are presented in Figure 8c. The numbering for the atoms contained within guanine, 8-oxoguanine, and isoxanthopterin are presented in Scheme 2.
Amino Acid Sequence Analysis
The amino acid sequences of the two isoxanthopterin deaminases, Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b, were aligned with two of the newly discovered enzymes that deaminate 8-oxoguanine (Pa0142 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Sgx9236e) and guanine deaminases from Homo sapiens and E. coli.2 The sequence alignment is shown in Figure 9. The eight β-strands from the (β/α)8-barrel structural fold in Sgx9339a are highlighted by the black arrows. The fully conserved metal binding and catalytic residues are highlighted in red. The metal binding residues include the two histidine residues from the C-terminus of β-strand 1, a histidine residue from the C-terminus of β-strand 5 and an aspartate from the C-terminus of β-strand 8. The two additional residues that are involved in the facilitation of the proton transfers and activation of the nucleophilic water molecule include a glutamate at the C-terminus of β-strand 5 (HxxE motif) and a histidine at the C-terminus of β-strand 6. The conserved glutamine residue in all six proteins that is positioned after the HxH motif at the C-terminal end of β-strand 1 is also highlighted in red. Conserved substrate binding residues found in all guanine deaminases are highlighted in green. These residues include the arginine and phenylalanine at the C-terminal end of β-strand 4 and the threonine at the C-terminal end of β-strand 2. For the two 8-oxoguanine deaminases (Pa0142 and Sgx9236e), these residues (in addition to a conserved tyrosine found at the C-terminal end of β-strand 2) are highlighted in light blue and the proposed substrate binding residues specific for the recognition of isoxanthopterin are highlighted in yellow. The remaining residues that are common to all three sets of enzymes are highlighted in dark blue
Sequence comparisons with guanine deaminase and 8-oxoguanine deaminase were subsequently used to differentiate a small group of enzymes, which are now predicted to catalyze the deamination of isoxanthopterin. Guanine deaminases utilize an Arg-Phe dyad for the recognition of guanine, whereas in 8-oxoguanine deaminase this dyad is changed to Cys-Ser. In the isoxanthopterin deaminases this dyad changes to Thr-Thr. It is remarkable that the glutamine, which hydrogen bonds with the carbonyl group of the ring to be deaminated, occurs in all three enzymes and the tyrosine, which interacts with the carbonyl group or ring nitrogen of the adjacent ring, occurs in 8-oxoguanine deaminase and isoxanthopterin deaminase (see Figure 8).
A BLAST search of protein sequences in the NCBI database was used to identify the organisms containing genes anticipated to catalyze the deamination of isoxanthopterin. From this search, 23 organisms were found to share this gene (as evidenced by conservation of the Thr-Thr motif from the C-terminus of β-strand 4, the glutamine from the C-terminus of β-strand 1, and the tyrosine from the C-terminus of β-strand 2). A complete list of genes and organisms is provided in Table S1. The novel isoxanthopterin deaminases share a sequence identity of greater than 41% and are predicted to participate in the deamination of isoxanthopterin within these organisms. Included with these 23 genes are four outliers (represented as red circles in subcluster 4 from Figure 1) which share a threonine-serine dyad at this position. These genes are: Mmwyl1_4101 (gi|152998097) from Marinomonas sp. MWYL1; HMPREF0023_2011 (gi|226953181) from Acinetobacter sp. ATCC 27244; PputW619_2587 (gi|170721762) from Pseudomonas putida W619; and PP_3209 (gi| 26989928) from Pseudomonas putida KT2440. It appears that the Thr-Ser dyad may be an evolutionary intermediate between the Cys-Ser dyad of the 8-oxoguanine deaminases and the Thr-Thr dyad of the isoxanthopterin deaminases. It has not been determined how this small difference in amino acid sequence will affect substrate specificity.
Isoxanthopterin has been isolated from multiple biological sources such as zebrafish embryos (30), the firebug Pyrrhocoris apterus (31), caviar (32) and in silkworm where isoxanthopterin deaminase activity was measured (33). Isoxanthopterin deaminase activity has previously been observed in extracts of Alcaligenes faecalis (34). A search of that genome was conducted in an attempt to identify the specific deaminase that may be similar to Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b but, unfortunately, the complete sequence of A. faecalis is not yet publicly available. Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b are the first proteins of known sequence found to possess significant deaminase activities against the pteridine compounds, isoxanthopterin and pterin-6-carboxylate.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
We thank Abby Sisco for help in the construction of Figure 1 and sequence analyses within cog0402. We thank the NYSGXRC protein production team for the preparation of Sgx9339a and Sgx9236b. We gratefully acknowledge data collection support for beamline X29 (NSLS).
Footnotes
This work was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (GM 71790 and GM 74945). The X-ray coordinates and structure factors for Sgx9339a have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB accession code: 2PAJ).
Abbreviations: AHS, amidohydrolase superfamily COG, cluster of orthologous groups, NYSGXRC, New York SGX Research Center for Structural Genomics VAST, vector alignment search tool.
The residue numbering for Sgx9339a that appears in Figure 8 corresponds to the numbering system and amino acid sequence used in the PDB file for 2PAJ.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE
A supplementary table (S1) that identifies enzymes predicted to catalyze the deamination of isoxanthopterin is provided. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
References
- 1.Cummings JA, Fedorov AA, Xu C, Brown S, Fedorov E, Babbitt PC, Almo SC, Raushel FM. Annotating enzymes of uncertain function: the deacylation of D-amino acids by members of the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry. 2009;48:6469–6481. doi: 10.1021/bi900661b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Xiang DF, Patskovsky Y, Xu C, Meyer AJ, Sauder JM, Burley SK, Almo SC, Raushel FM. Functional identification of incorrectly annotated prolidases from the amidohydrolase superfamily of enzymes. Biochemistry. 2009;48:3730–3742. doi: 10.1021/bi900111q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nguyen TT, Brown S, Fedorov AA, Fedorov EV, Babbitt PC, Almo SC, Raushel FM. At the periphery of the amidohydrolase superfamily: Bh0493 from Bacillus halodurans catalyzes the isomerization of d-galacturonate to d-tagaturonate. Biochemistry. 2008;47:1194–1206. doi: 10.1021/bi7017738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marti-Arbona R, Xu C, Steele S, Weeks A, Kuty GF, Seibert CM, Raushel FM. Annotating enzymes of unknown function: N-formimino-l-glutamate deiminase is a member of the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry. 2006;45:1997–2005. doi: 10.1021/bi0525425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hermann JC, Marti-Arbona R, Fedorov AA, Fedorov E, Almo SC, Shoichet BK, Raushel FM. Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function. Nature. 2007;448:775–779. doi: 10.1038/nature05981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pieper U, Chiang R, Seffernick JJ, Brown SD, Glasner ME, Kelly L, Eswar N, Sauder JM, Bonanno JB, Swaminathan S, Burley SK, Zheng X, Chance MR, Almo SC, Gerlt JA, Raushel FM, Jacobson MP, Babbitt PC, Sali A. Target selection and annotation for the structural genomics of the amidohydrolase and enolase superfamilies. J. Struct. Funct. Genomics. 2009;10:107–125. doi: 10.1007/s10969-008-9056-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hermann JC, Ghanem E, Li Y, Raushel FM, Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK. Predicting substrates by docking high-energy intermediates to enzyme structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:15882–15891. doi: 10.1021/ja065860f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Irwin JJ, Raushel FM, Shoichet BK. Virtual screening against metalloenzymes for inhibitors and substrates. Biochemistry. 2005;44:12316–12328. doi: 10.1021/bi050801k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Xiang DF, Xu C, Kumaran D, Brown AC, Sauder JM, Burley SK, Swaminathan S, Raushel FM. Functional annotation of two new carboxypeptidases from the amidohydrolase superfamily of enzymes. Biochemistry. 2009;48:4567–4576. doi: 10.1021/bi900453u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xiang DF, Kolb P, Fedorov AA, Meier MM, Fedorov LV, Nguyen TT, Sterner R, Almo SC, Shoichet BK, Raushel FM. Functional annotation and three-dimensional structure of Dr0930 from Deinococcus radiodurans, a close relative of phosphotriesterase in the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry. 2009;48:2237–2247. doi: 10.1021/bi802274f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Holm L, Sander C. An evolutionary treasure: unification of a broad set of amidohydrolases related to urease. Proteins. 1997;28:72–82. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Seibert CM, Raushel FM. Structural and catalytic diversity within the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry. 2005;44:6383–6391. doi: 10.1021/bi047326v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Martynowski D, Eyobo Y, Li T, Yang K, Liu A, Zhang H. Crystal structure of alpha-amino-beta-carboxymuconate-epsilon-semialdehyde decarboxylase: insight into the active site and catalytic mechanism of a novel decarboxylation reaction. Biochemistry. 2006;45:10412–10421. doi: 10.1021/bi060903q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu A, Zhang H. Transition metal-catalyzed nonoxidative decarboxylation reactions. Biochemistry. 2006;45:10407–10411. doi: 10.1021/bi061031v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hara H, Masai E, Katayama Y, Fukuda M. The 4-oxalomesaconate hydratase gene, involved in the protocatechuate 4,5-cleavage pathway, is essential to vanillate and syringate degradation in Sphingomonas paucimobilis SYK-6. J. Bacteriol. 2000;182:6950–6957. doi: 10.1128/jb.182.24.6950-6957.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Williams L, Nguyen T, Li Y, Porter TN, Raushel FM. Uronate isomerase: a nonhydrolytic member of the amidohydrolase superfamily with an ambivalent requirement for a divalent metal ion. Biochemistry. 2006;45:7453–7462. doi: 10.1021/bi060531l. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nguyen TT, Fedorov AA, Williams L, Fedorov EV, Li Y, Xu C, Almo SC, Raushel FM. The mechanism of the reaction catalyzed by uronate isomerase illustrates how an isomerase may have evolved from a hydrolase within the amidohydrolase superfamily. Biochemistry. 2009;48:8879–8890. doi: 10.1021/bi901046x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Atkinson HJ, Morris JH, Ferrin TE, Babbitt PC. Using Sequence Similarity Networks for Visualization of Relationships Across Diverse Protein Superfamilies. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hall RS, Fedorov AA, Marti-Arbona R, Fedorov EV, Kolb P, Sauder JM, Burley SK, Shoichet BK, Almo SC, Raushel FM. The Hunt for 8-Oxoguanine Deaminase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:1762–1763. doi: 10.1021/ja909817d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Otwinowski Z, Minor W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:307–326. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76066-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schneider TR, Sheldrick GM. Substructure solution with SHELXD. Acta Crystallogr. 2002;D 58:1772–1779. doi: 10.1107/s0907444902011678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.De-La-Fortelle E, Bricogne G. Maximum-likelihood heavy atom parameter refinement in the MIR and MAD methods. Methods Enzymol. 1997;276:472–493. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(97)76073-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 1994;50:760–763. doi: 10.1107/S0907444994003112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Perrakis A, Morris R, Lamzin VS. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nature Struct. Biol. 1999;6:458–463. doi: 10.1038/8263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jones TA, Zou J-Y, Cowan SW, Kjeldgaard M. Improved methods in building protein models in electron density map and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. 1991;A 47:110–119. doi: 10.1107/s0108767390010224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Brunger AT, Adams PD, Clore GM, Delano WL, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Jiang JS, Kuszwewski J, Nilges M, Pannu NS, Read RJ, Rice LM, Somonsom T, Warren GL. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. 1998;D 54:905–921. doi: 10.1107/s0907444998003254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ireton GC, McDermott G, Black ME, Stoddard BL. The structure of Escherichia coli cytosine deaminase. J. Mol. Biol. 2002;315:687–697. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wilson DK, Rudolph FB, Quiocho FA. Atomic structure of adenosine deaminase complexed with a transition-state analog: understanding catalysis and immunodeficiency mutations. Science. 1991;252:1278–1284. doi: 10.1126/science.1925539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Levy CC, Mc NW. The biological transformation of xanthopterin by a bacterium isolated from soil. Biochemistry. 1962;1:1161–1170. doi: 10.1021/bi00912a030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ziegler I, McDonald T, Hesslinger C, Pelletier I, Boyle P. Development of the pteridine pathway in the zebrafish. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:18926–18932. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M910307199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bel Y, Porcar M, Socha R, Nemec V, Ferre J. Analysis of pteridines in Pyrrhocoris apterus (L.) (Heteroptera, Pyrrhocoridae) during development and in body-color mutants. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1997;34:83–98. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Andondonskaja-Renz B, Zeitler HJ. Determination of pteridines in royal jelly and caviar by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Micronutr. Anal. 1989;5:83–90. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gyure WL. Catabolism of isoxanthopterin during the development of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. 1974;4:303–312. [Google Scholar]
- 34.McNutt WS., Jr. The metabolism of isoxanthopterin by Alcaligenes faecalis. J. Biol. Chem. 1963;238:1116–1121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.