Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Org Lett. 2010 Jul 2;12(13):3100–3103. doi: 10.1021/ol101122u

Photooxidation of Mixed Aryl and Biarylphosphines

Dong Zhang , Jeff A Celaje , Alon Agua , Chad Doan , Timothy Stewart , Robert Bau ‡,§, Matthias Selke †,*
PMCID: PMC2892562  NIHMSID: NIHMS212607  PMID: 20527907

Abstract

graphic file with name nihms212607f4.jpg

Aryl phosphines and dialkylbiaryl phosphines react with singlet oxygen to form phosphinate esters. For mixed arylphosphines, the most electron-rich aryl group migrates to form the phosphinate, while for dialkylbiaryl phosphines migration of the alkyl group occurs. Dialkylbiaryl phosphines also yield arene epoxides, especially in electron rich systems. Phosphinate ester formation is increased at high temperature while protic solvents increase the yield of epoxide. The product distribution provides evidence for Buchwald’s recent conformational model for the aerobic oxidation of dialkylbiaryl phosphines.


Phosphadioxiranes are highly reactive heteroatom-containing peroxides, and belong to what Greer et al. have aptly called “rather exotic types of cyclic peroxides”.1 It is now well-established that they are the primary intermediates in the reaction of singlet dioxygen with phosphines.2,3 In addition, at very high temperatures, phosphadioxiranes are probably formed during the reaction of triplet dioxygen with phosphines.4 Intermolecular oxygen atom transfer from these highly unstable intermediates to the starting phosphine leads to phosphine oxide formation. In addition to this process, phosphadioxiranes may undergo a variety of interesting reactions, including oxygen atom insertion into the aryl P-C bond to form phosphinate esters, and, in a few cases, arene epoxidation.5,2b,2c Several theoretical studies suggest that phosphadioxiranes should be electrophilic oxidants.3 However, the scope of oxygen atom transfer reactions from phosphadioxirane as well as the regioselectivity, and effects of temperature and solvent are not known. For example, the photooxidation of arylphosphines with different aryl groups attached to the phosphorus atom has not been studied, i.e. it is not known if the formation of phosphinate esters is regioselective. Furthermore, there have been no reports of photooxidation of several other important classes of phosphines such as phosphines bearing biaryl ligands. Intramolecular oxygen atom insertion into the P-C bond and arene epoxidation might ultimately be useful reactions for the functionalization of such phosphines, if the scope and regioselectivity of these reactions were known, and if the competing intermolecular oxygen atom transfer to form phosphine oxide could be limited. In this paper, we present a detailed investigation of product distribution, regioselectivity, solvent and temperature effects of the reactions of phosphadioxiranes generated from singlet oxygen and a variety of different phosphines. We show that oxygen atom insertion in mixed (i.e. bearing different aryl and/or alkyl groups) phosphines is in fact regioselective. We also investigate how solvent and temperature effects can be used to maximize the yield of either phosphinate ester or arene epoxide.

Photooxidation of aryl phosphines bearing large substituents in the ortho position of the aryl ligand predominately yield phosphinate esters from intramolecular oxygen atom insertion into the P-C bond.2b Arylphosphines without bulky substituents give mainly phosphine oxide upon reaction with singlet oxygen. The intermediate phosphadioxirane is presumed to be an electrophilic oxidant, but there is little experimental evidence, as phosphines bearing different aryl ligands have not been studied. We have therefore begun our study of the photooxidation of mixed phosphines by investigating the reaction of bis(ortho-methoxyphenyl)-phenylphosphine (1) with singlet oxygen. Photooxidation of 1 at room temperature (solvent = toluene-d8, sensitizer = tetraphenylporphyrin (TPP), phosphine concentration = 1 mM to 20 mM, Tungsten-Halogen lamp, cut-off filter at 493 nm) leads to only two products, namely (ortho-methoxyphenyl) phenyl ortho-methoxyphenyl-phosphinate (2), and bis(ortho-methoxyphenyl)-phenylphosphine oxide (3).

Both products were characterized by 1H and 31P NMR, and their identities were confirmed by X-ray molecular structures (see supporting information). The insertion reaction leading to formation of 2 is completely regioselective. We did not observe any oxygen atom insertion into the P-C bond bearing the unsubstituted phenyl ring. Furthermore, unlike for binaphthyl phosphines,2c we did not observe any hydroxylation of the aromatic ring.

Dialkylbiaryl phosphines have been widely used in Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions, in part because they are rather resistant towards oxidation.6,7 Buchwald et al. have recently suggested that the biaryl ligand as well as substituents on the 2’ and 6’ position of the biaryl ring play a key role in the susceptibility – or lack thereof – towards reaction with triplet oxygen.6 The reactivity of these phosphines with singlet oxygen has not been studied to date. A priori, a wide range of possible products can be envisioned, i.e. oxygen atom insertion into the P-C bond of either the alkyl or biaryl ligand, formation of arene epoxides, and simple formation of phosphine oxide by intermolecular oxygen atom transfer. Of particular interest is the question of whether alkyl or aryl group migration is preferred in these compounds; alkyl migration in a phosphadioxirane has not previously been reported.

The reaction of unsubstituted 2-di-t-butyl biphenylphosphine (4) with singlet dioxygen in deuterated toluene at room temperature yields the corresponding phosphine oxide (5) as the sole product (see Table 1). No epoxidation or insertion products (i.e. via alkyl or aryl migration) were observed. Even at high temperature where aryl migration may be more favorable (see below) the reaction of singlet oxygen with biphenylphosphine 4 in toluene yields phosphine oxide 5 as the only product.

Table 1.

Product Distribution and rates of Singlet Oxygen Removal (kT) for Photooxidation of Dialkylbiaryl Phosphines

starting
phosphine
kT × 10−7
(M−1sec−1)a
phosphine
oxide
(%)b
phosphinate
(%)b
arene
epoxide
(%)b
4 1.2 ± 0.1 100 ± 1 0 0
6 0.81 ± 0.05 13 ± 0.3 84 ± 0.1 2 ± 0.3
10 0.63 ± 0.05 65 ± 4 13 ± 5 22 ± 4
14 2.1 ± 0.1 0 0 100 ± 1
a

kT values are averages of three runs, error is one standard deviation.

b

All reactions were performed in an NMR tube using 1 mL solutions of biphenylphosphine (24 mM) in toluene-d8, concentration of TPP sensitizer = 0.13 mM. Relative amount of products were calculated (average of three runs, error is one standard deviation) using 31P NMR integrations.

In marked contrast to the unsubstituted 2-di-t-butyl biphenylphosphine 4, the bulky highly substituted di-t-butyl tri-isopropyl biphenylphosphine 6 reacts with singlet dioxygen to form phosphine oxide 7 and phosphinate 8 (see Scheme 2), as well as a very small amount of arene epoxide 9 in toluene-d8. The latter compound is readily identified by the 1H NMR signals of the vinyl protons of the oxidized ring which give rise to singlets at 5.70 and 4.70 ppm. Even at room temperature, at 24 mM starting concentration of 6, the phosphinate product 8 predominates (Table 1). The phosphinate ester 8 is of special interest: We were able to establish that migration in phosphines containing both alkyl and aryl ligands, migration of the alkyl group is favored over the aryl group. The 1H NMR spectrum of a purified sample of 8 shows that the hydrogens of the tert-butyl group directly attached to the phosphorous are split by the phosphorous atom into a doublet (J = 15.9 Hz) at 0.97 ppm. The hydrogen atoms of the tert-butyl group bound to the oxygen, on the other hand, exhibit no coupling to the phosphorous atom and thus occur as a singlet at 1.42 ppm. In contrast to phosphinate 8, the hydrogens of both tert-butyl groups of phosphine oxide 7 are chemically equivalent and appear as a doublet (J = 13.3 Hz) at 1.25 ppm. Additional details of the spectroscopic analyses are given in the supporting information.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Photooxidation of Dialkyl Triisopropyl Biphenylphosphines

Interestingly, the reactivity of the related dicyclohexyl tri-isopropyl biphenylphosphine 10 is rather different. During photooxidation of 10 at room temperature, formation of phosphine oxide 11 predominates relative to phosphinate ester 12, i.e. intermolecular oxygen atom transfer is much more facile than for the di-t-butyl phosphine 6. Furthermore, we observed a considerable amount of epoxide 13 (22% at room temperature for initial concentration of 10 of 24 mM, Table 1). The epoxide could be formed either by intramolecular or intermolecular oxygen atom transfer from the intermediate phosphadioxirane. If the epoxidation proceeds by an intramolecular pathway, the product ratio of epoxide and phosphine oxide vs. starting phosphine concentration (at low conversion of phosphine) can be expressed by equation (1), where kepox is the rate constant for epoxide formation from phosphadioxirane, and ko is the rate constant for intermolecular oxygen atom transfer to give two equivalents of phosphine oxide:

[11][13]=2ko[10]kepox (1)

A plot of the product ratio 11/13 vs. 10 gave a straight line with a slope (2ko/kepox) of 110 M−1, confirming that epoxidation is indeed an intramolecular process. The relative rate ratio of intramolecular epoxidation vs. intermolecular oxygen atom transfer is 55 M−1, and intermolecular oxygen atom transfer predominates, except at very low concentrations of 10 (2 mM or less).

Even though the photooxidation product distribution for phosphines 6 and 10 is very different, we determined that their rate constants for singlet oxygen removal kT are very similar (Table 1, second column). This implies that the approach of the singlet oxygen molecule to phosphines 6 and 10 is not affected by the difference of the alkyl ligands. Hence the origin of the different product distribution results from steric factors of the intermediate phosphadioxirane complexes and their interaction with starting phosphines. Buchwald and Barder recently noted that phosphine 6 is considerably more resistant to reaction with ground state (triplet) oxygen than phosphine 10.6 They investigated the barrier for rotation around the P-C bond of the biaryl ligand such that the phosphorus lone pair (or peroxidic intermediate) points away from the large biphenyl ligand. For compound 6, this rotational barrier is much larger than for compound 10 (12.6 kcal/mol vs. 6.3 kcal/mol).6 Furthermore, they determined that the “away conformer” (where the phosphorus lone pair or the dioxygen moiety of a peroxidic intermediate points away from the bulky biaryl ring system) is much more disfavored for compound 6 relative to compound 10. Our observations for the product distribution during the photooxidation of 6 and 10 provide strong evidence for Buchwald’s model. Since compound 6 has a much more restricted rotation and the “away conformer” is more strongly disfavored, intermolecular oxygen atom transfer to unreacted starting material is much more difficult, and intramolecular oxygen atom insertion predominates.

Replacement of the isopropyl groups of the biaryl phosphines with isopropoxy groups also has a drastic effect on the reactivity of the intermediate phosphadioxirane: reaction of diisopropoxy biphenylphosphine 14 with singlet oxygen in toluene-d8 gives epoxide 15 in nearly quantitative yield (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

Photooxidation of Diisopropoxy Biphenylphosphine

Epoxide 15 is stable at 0 °C for weeks, but decomposes into a complex mixture at room temperature. The rate of singlet oxygen removal (kT) by this phosphine is faster compared to the other biaryl phosphines, due to the electron-donating character of the isopropoxy groups.

The product distribution in all of the photooxidation reactions reported here is highly sensitive to temperature and solvent effects. In general, at higher temperature, the yield of phosphinate ester is increased, and that of phosphine oxide is diminished. Details are given in Table 1. Thus, if the phosphinate esters are desired products, carrying out the photooxidation at high temperature and low starting material concentrations will result in the highest yields of phosphinate esters.

The presence of protic solvents leads to protonation of the intermediate phosphadioxirane, and formation of hydroperoxy phosphoranes.2a,2b,3b Very little is known about the chemistry of the latter species. To investigate the reactivity of the hydroperoxy phosphorane, we added up to 20% (by volume) of CD3OD to phosphines 6 and 10 prior to carrying out the photooxidation. Under these conditions, phosphinate ester formation is suppressed while the yield of epoxide and phosphine oxide is increased (Table 3). Clearly, the hydroperoxy phosphorane is much more capable than phosphadioxirane to form arene epoxides. Hence, if the latter product is desired, one can simply carry out the photooxidation under protic conditions. In general, despite the fact that photooxidation of biaryl phosphines may lead to multiple products, judicious choice of temperature and solvent system can maximize the yield of one of the oxidation products over the others.

Table 3.

Product Distribution During Photooxidation of Dialkylbiaryl Phosphines Upon Addition of CD3OD

starting
phosphine
CD3OD in
toluene-d8
phosphine
oxide (%)
phosphinate
(%)
epoxide
(%)
6 0 13 ± 0.3 84 ± 0.1 2 ± 0.3
6 2% 27 ± 3 66 ± 5 8 ± 2
6 20% 62 ± 5 6 ± 0.6 32 ± 5
10 0 65 ± 4 13 ± 5 22 ± 4
10 2% 53 ± 3 8 ± 0.4 39 ± 4
10 20% 11 ± 1 0 89 ± 1

All reactions were performed in an NMR tube using 1 mL solutions of biphenylphosphine (24 mM). Relative amount of products were calculated (average of three runs, error is one standard deviation) using 31P NMR integrations.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Reaction of Bis(ortho-methoxyphenyl)-phenylphosphine (1) with Singlet Oxygen

Table 2.

Product Distribution During Photooxidation of Dialkylbiaryl Phosphines at Different Temperatures

starting
phosphine
T
(°C)
phosphine
oxide (%)
phosphinate
(%)
arene
epoxide (%)
6 22 13 ± 0.3 84 ± 0.1 2 ± 0.3
6 60 8 ± 1 90 ± 1 2 ± 0.3
10 22 65 ± 4 13 ± 5 22 ± 4
10 60 36 ± 2 44 ± 1 20 ± 2

All reactions were performed in an NMR tube using 1 mL solutions of biphenylphosphine (24 mM) in toluene-d8. Relative amount of products were calculated (average of three runs, error is one standard deviation) using 31P NMR integrations.

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge support from the NIH-NIGMS 5SC1GM084776. A.A. acknowledges support from the NIH-NIGMS RISE program, GM061331.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures, full spectroscopic data for all new compounds, and CIF files for compounds 2 and 3. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Sawwan N, Alexander Greer A. Chem. Rev. 2007;107:3247. doi: 10.1021/cr0400717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Ho DG, Gao R, Celaje J, Chung H-Y, Selke M. Science. 2003;302:259. doi: 10.1126/science.1089145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Gao R, Ho DG, Dong T, Khuu D, Franco N, Sezer O, Selke M. Org. Lett. 2001;3:3719. doi: 10.1021/ol010195v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zhang D, Gao R, Afzal S, Vargas M, Sharma S, McCurdy A, Yousufuddin M, Stewart T, Bau R, Selke M. Org. Lett. 2006;8:5125. doi: 10.1021/ol0622007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Zhang D, Ye B, Ho DG, Gao R, Selke M. Tetrahedron. 2006;62:10729. [Google Scholar]; (e) Huang YL, Chang CP, Hong FE. Dalton Trans. 2006:5454. doi: 10.1039/b611359a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Clennan EL, Pace A. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:6665. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Wilke JJ, Weinhold F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:11850. doi: 10.1021/ja060676f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nahm K, Li Y, Evanseck JD, Houk KN, Foote CS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993;115:4879. [Google Scholar]; (c) Nahm K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2009;30:2217. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Beaver BD, Gao L, Fedak MG, Coleman MM, Sobkowiak M. Energy Fuels. 2002;16:1134. [Google Scholar]; (b) Beaver BD, Clifford CB, Fedak MG, Gao L, Iyer PS, Sobkowiak M. Energy Fuels. 2006;20:1639. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsuji S, Kondo M, Ishiguro K, Sawaki Y. J. Org. Chem. 1993;58:5055. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Barder TE, Buchwald SL. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:5096. doi: 10.1021/ja0683180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Martin R, Buchwald SL. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008;41:1461. doi: 10.1021/ar800036s. and references therein.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003

RESOURCES