Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jun 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jun 30;132(25):8527–8529. doi: 10.1021/ja103933n

Intramolecular [1 + 2] and [3 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions of Cyclopropenone Ketals

Paresma R Patel 1, Dale L Boger 1,
PMCID: PMC2892887  NIHMSID: NIHMS212604  PMID: 20527885

Abstract

The first intramolecular thermal reactions of cyclopropenone ketals are reported enlisting substrates tethered to an electron-deficient olefin bearing a single electron-withdrawing substituent. Whereas the intermolecular variants of the reactions provide only the products of an endo selective [1 + 2] cycloaddition or a carbonyl addition reaction of a thermally generated π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene, the intramolecular variants provide either [1 + 2] or [3 + 2] cycloadducts in reactions that depend on the reaction conditions, the alkene activating substituent, and the nature of the tethering. In addition to providing key mechanistic insights into the thermal [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction for such substrates, they were also found to proceed under conditions that reflect the ease and regioselectivity of the cyclopropenone ketal cleavage for π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene generation. The most effective combination of structural features that impact the reactivity was observed with substrates bearing an aldehyde or ketone substituted electron-deficient olefin and incorporating an aryl cyclopropenone ketal substituent built into the linking tether. Simply warming a solution of such substrates in toluene at 80–100 °C directly provided the [3 + 2] cycloadducts in excellent yield (60–88%) under mild thermal reaction conditions.


The disclosure of the reversible thermal generation of π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbenes from cyclopropenone ketals first emerged from an examination of the cycloaddition reactions of the parent unsubstituted cyclopropenone ketals.1 This resulted in the discovery of the thermal [1 + 2],2 [3 + 2],3 and [3 + 4]4 cycloaddition reactions of singlet π-delocalized vinylcarbenes that complement the [4 + 2]5 cycloaddition reactions of the cyclopropenone ketals themselves, providing a rich series of reactions whose course could be controlled by a combination of the choice of substrate and the reaction conditions (Figure 1).1,6

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Generation and intermolecular cycloaddition reactions of a π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene.

A key element to emerge from the studies was the reversibility of the thermal π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene generation that insures its eventual productive trap by an electron-deficient substrate. In preceding studies, only intermolecular cycloadditions were examined with a focus on understanding the underlying mechanistic questions posed by the observed reactions.1,6 Herein, we report the first intramolecular thermal cycloaddition reactions of cyclopropenone ketals that permit the nature of the substrate tethering and the stereoelectronic (orbital alignment) features of the reactions to control the reaction course providing additional mechanistic insights into these unique thermal reactions. Examined herein are the reactions of a cyclopropenone ketal tethered to an electron-deficient olefin bearing a single electron-withdrawing substituent. Whereas the intermolecular reactions provide only the olefin addition products derived from an endo selective [1 + 2] cycloaddition,2 the intramolecular variants provide either [1 + 2] or [3 + 2] cycloadducts in reactions that depend on the reaction conditions, the alkene activating substituent, and the nature of the tethering. In addition to providing key mechanistic insights into the thermal [3 + 2] cycloaddition, they were also found to proceed under conditions that reflect the ease and regioselectivity of the cyclopropenone ketal cleavage7 for π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene generation.

Substrates that explore two variations on the tether (alkyl or aryl) were examined.8 The most remarkable combination of structural features that impact the reactivity was observed with substrates 1a–5a bearing an aldehyde or ketone substituted electron-deficient olefin and an aryl cyclopropenone ketal substituent built into the linking tether (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

Simply warming a solution of 1a in toluene at 80 °C (12 h) directly provided the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 1b in good yield (70%) as a single diastereomer whose structure and stereochemistry were confirmed by X-ray9 (Scheme 1). Extension of the tether by one carbon (2a), constituting a four versus three atom linker, similarly provided the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 2b (X-ray)9 directly in good yield (60%, 16 h, 80 °C). Further substitution of the electron-deficient olefins with a methyl group (substrates 3a and 4a) resulted in diastereospecific generation of the [3 + 2] cycloadducts 3b and 4b in good conversion (88% and 60%, 12–16 h, 80 °C) and as single diastereomers (X-rays)9 in which the stereochemistry of the substrate olefin is maintained in the product. Similarly, the ketone substrate 5a directly provided the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 5b in excellent yield (77%) under comparable and mild thermal reaction conditions (100 °C, 8 h, Scheme 1). The reaction course observed with the substrates 1a–5a is remarkable in two respects. First, the reactions directly provide the [3 + 2] cycloadducts under mild thermal reaction conditions and likely entail an intermediate thermal vinylcyclopropane rearrangement that proceeds with a previously unprecedented ease.10 Just as significantly, the intramolecular tethering of the substrates precludes the otherwise preferred intermolecular carbonyl addition of the thermally-generated π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene.3b Representative of this preference, the intermolecular reaction of the phenyl substituted cyclopropenone ketal 6 with methyl vinyl ketone (7) cleanly provides only the carbonyl addition product 8 (80 °C, 2 h, 68%) without the detection of olefin addition products despite the propensity for the electrophilic double bond of 7 to dominate its reactivity (Scheme 1).

Highlighting the unique reactivity of 1a–5a, the substrate 9 incorporating a nitrile substituted electron-deficient olefin cleanly provided the cyclopropane 11 (94%) upon warming at 80 °C in toluene (16 h), resulting from endo [1 + 2] cycloaddition of the thermally-generated singlet π-delocalized vinylcarbene and hydrolysis of the ketene acetal 10 upon aqueous workup (eq. 1). Moreover, warming either a solution of 10 (generated in situ at 80 °C, 16 h), or a solution of 9 in toluene at 170 °C (8 h, 72%) directly provided the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 12 (X-rays),9 arising from initial [1 + 2] cycloaddition of the thermally-generated singlet π-delocalized vinylcarbene followed by vinylcyclopropane rearrangement. In addition to defining the mechanism responsible for the [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of such substrates, the comparisons of 1a–5a with 9 underscores the remarkable activating properties of the aldehyde or ketone substituent for the ensuing vinylcyclopropane rearrangement.10

graphic file with name nihms212604f5.jpg (1)

Similarly, substrates 13 and 16 bearing an ethyl ester substituent on the tethered olefin selectively provided the endo [1 + 2] cycloadducts 14 (95%) or 17 (67%), respectively, as single diastereomers when warmed at 80 °C in toluene (16 h) (Scheme 2). The reaction of substrate 16 with the longer four versus three atom linker (13) was slower, but effective (67% vs 95%), and substitution of the double bond with an additional methyl substituent (19) did not alter the course or endo diastereoselectivity of the reaction, providing exclusively 20 (74%) containing a quaternary center incapable of epimerization. Only a trace of the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 15 (< 4%) was detected under the conditions (80 °C, 16 h) that provided 14 (Scheme 2). When warmed at 170 °C in toluene (8 h), 13 and 16 cleanly provided the corresponding [3 + 2] cycloadducts 15 and 18 in 80% (7:1 dr) and 55% (>20–30:1 dr), respectively. In the case of 13 where the reaction was examined in detail, warming the intermediate vinylcyclopropane generated in situ (80 °C, 16 h) at 170 °C (8 h) also provided the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 15, whereas warming a solution of the substrate 13 at 175 °C for only a brief period (10 min) provided the [1 + 2] cycloadduct 14 (70%) along with only a small amount of the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 15 (8%). Collectively, both results indicate that the initial vinylcyclopropane [1 + 2] cycloadduct is an intermediate en route to the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 15. Given the diastereospecific reactions of 3a and 4a, it should also be noted that the partial loss of stereochemistry with the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 15, as well as 12, may reflect partial epimerization of the products under the thermal conditions rather than definitive evidence of a stepwise vinylcyclopropane rearrangement since warming a solution of pure 15 at 170 °C leads to slow epimerization (dr 8:1 at 1 h). Finally, kinetic trap of the π-delocalized vinylcarbene generated from 13 (C6H6–MeOH, 90 °C, 2 h) revealed regioselective cleavage preferentially leading to 22, resulting from phenyl stabilization of its allyl cation and contributing to the facility of the cycloaddition reactions.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

Analogous to the behavior of 1a–4a, the substrate 23 bearing an alkyl substituted cyclopropenone ketal, a straight chain alkyl tether, and an aldehyde substituted electron-deficient olefin provided directly a single diastereomer (X-ray)9 of the [3 + 2] cycloadduct 24 (53%), but required more vigorous reaction conditions (170 °C, xylene, 16 h) (Scheme 3). The effect of the alkyl tethering was examined in detail with the ethyl ester substrates 25 and 28. Because of the lower reactivity, it was more difficult to develop conditions that cleanly provided only the initial [1 + 2] cycloadducts. Thus, 25 and 28 provided the products 26 and 29, respectively, in more modest conversions, and required higher temperatures and longer reaction times (120 °C, 40 h vs 80 °C, 16 h) for observation of the initial endo [1 + 2] cycloaddition. However, warming a solution of 25 at the higher reaction temperature of 180 °C (o-Cl2C6H4, 8 h) cleanly provided the corresponding [3 + 2] cycloadduct 27 in good yield (70%) (Scheme 3). Terminating this latter reaction conducted at the higher reaction temperature (180 °C) at shorter reaction times (4 h and 1 h) led to isolation of increasing amounts of the [1 + 2] cycloadduct 26 (25% and 55%, respectively) with the accompanying lower conversions to 27 (63% and 21%, respectively) indicating that the reaction proceeds by initial [1 + 2] cycloaddition of the thermally-generated π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene followed by a vinylcyclopropane rearrangement to provide 27. In this series and because of the higher reaction temperatures required for the initial [1 + 2] cycloaddition, it was not possible to define conditions that cleanly provided the [1 + 2] cycloadducts without significant generation of the [3 + 2] products. Responsible in part for this behavior, kinetic trap of the π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene derived from 25 (C6H6–MeOH, 90 °C, 2 h) revealed preferential regioselective cleavage to provide the isomer 30, requiring the reversible and occasional generation of 31 for productive partitioning into the reaction cascade (Scheme 3). In contrast, direct conversion to the [3 + 2] cycloadducts occurs cleanly, albeit requiring the higher reaction temperature (180 °C), and proceeds at rates and conversions comparable to the phenyl tethered substrates.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3

The first study defining the scope of the intramolecular cycloaddition reactions of cyclopropenone ketals tethered to olefins bearing a single electron-withdrawing substituent were detailed exploring the cyclopropenone ketal substitution, two variations on the linking tether (alkyl or aryl), and the impact of the olefin electron-withdrawing substituent. The most effective combination of structural features was observed with substrates bearing an aldehyde or ketone substituted electron-deficient olefin and an aryl cyclopropenone ketal substituent built into the linking tether. Unlike their intermolecular reactions, such substrates now not only participate in olefin addition reactions rather than the otherwise preferred carbonyl addition reactions by virtue of the constraints imposed by the linking tether, but they were also found to directly provide [3 + 2] cycloadducts in excellent yields under mild thermal reaction conditions (80–100 °C). Less activated substrates bearing an ester or nitrile substituted olefin provided intermediate cyclopropanes derived from endo [1 + 2] cycloaddition of the thermally-generated singlet π-delocalized vinylcarbene under mild thermal conditions (80–100 °C), or cleanly provided the [3 + 2] cycloadducts at higher reaction temperatures (170–180 °C) required to promote the intermediate vinylcyclopropane rearrangement. In addition to defining a two-step mechanism leading to the [3 + 2] cycloaddition products, the cycloaddition cascade of the aldehyde and ketone substrates was found to entail vinylcyclopropane rearrangements that proceed with an unprecedented ease.10

Examination of additional intramolecular cycloaddition reactions of cyclopropenone ketals and the exploitation of the remarkable facility (80 °C) with which the intramolecular [3 + 2] cycloaddition of a thermally generated π-delocalized singlet vinylcarbene proceeds with selected substrates are in progress.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003
4_si_004
5_si_005
6_si_006
7_si_007
8_si_008

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National Institutes of Health (CA042056) and the Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology. P.R.P. is a Skaggs Fellow.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Full experimental details are provided. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Boger DL, Brotherton CE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986;108:6695–6713. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Boger DL, Brotherton CE. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984;25:5611–5614. [Google Scholar]; (b) Tokuyama H, Yamada T, Nakamura E. Synlett. 1993:589–591. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Boger DL, Brotherton CE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984;106:805–807. [Google Scholar]; (b) Boger DL, Brotherton CE, Georg GI. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984;25:5615–5619. [Google Scholar]; (c) Boger DL, Brotherton CE, Georg GI. Org. Synth. 1987;65:32–40. [Google Scholar]; (d) Boger DL, Wysocki RJ., Jr J. Org. Chem. 1988;53:3408–3421. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Boger DL, Brotherton CE. J. Org. Chem. 1985;50:3425–3427. [Google Scholar]; (b) Boger DL, Brotherton CE. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986;108:6713–6719. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Albert RM, Butler GB. J. Org. Chem. 1977;42:674–679. Boger DL, Brotherton CE. Tetrahedron. 1986;42:2777–2785. Boger DL, Zhu Y. J. Org. Chem. 1994;59:3453–3458. Boger DL, Takahashi K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995;117:12452–12459. Boger DL, Ichikawa S, Jiang H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:12169–12173. For a [5 + 2] cycloaddition, see: Delgado A, Castedo L, Mascarenas JL. Org. Lett. 2002;4:3091–3094. doi: 10.1021/ol0263954.
  • 6.Reviews: Boger DL, Brotherton-Pleiss CE. In: Advances in Cycloaddition. Curran DP, editor. Vol. 2. JAI Press; 1990. pp. 147–219. Nakamura M, Isobe H, Nakamura E. Chem. Rev. 2003;103:1295–1326. doi: 10.1021/cr0100244.
  • 7.Tokuyama H, Isaka M, Nakamura E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992;114:5523–5530. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Although not the topic of this communication, the substrate preparations (Supporting Information) revealed the robust nature of the cyclopropenone ketal and indicate that it can be carried through a range of reactions (e.g., Bu4NF, CrO3–pyr2 or TPAP, Wittig reaction, Negishi coupling) that may otherwise appear challenging.
  • 9.The X-rays have been deposited with Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: 1b (CCDC773877), 2b (CCDC775265), 3b (CCDC776316), 4b (CDCC776318) 12 major diastereomer (CDCC762696), 12 minor diastereomer (CCDC773876), 24 (CCDC776317).
  • 10.Hudlicky T, Kutchan TM, Naqvi S. Org. React. 1985;33:247–335. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001
2_si_002
3_si_003
4_si_004
5_si_005
6_si_006
7_si_007
8_si_008

RESOURCES