Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: IUBMB Life. 2010 Jul;62(7):492–496. doi: 10.1002/iub.322

From stem cell to erythroblast: Regulation of red cell production at multiple levels by multiple hormones

Harvey Lodish 1,2,3, Johan Flygare 1, Song Chou 1
PMCID: PMC2893266  NIHMSID: NIHMS189132  PMID: 20306512

Abstract

This article reviews the regulation of production of red blood cells at several levels: (1) the ability of erythropoietin and adhesion to a fibronectin matrix to stimulate the rapid production of red cells by inducing terminal proliferation and differentiation of committed erythroid CFU-E progenitors; (2) the regulated expansion of the pool of earlier BFU-E erythroid progenitors by glucocorticoids and other factors that occurs during chronic anemia or inflammation; and (3) the expansion of the hematopoietic cell pool to produce more progenitors of all hematopoietic lineages.


Red blood cells are continuously replenished; their half- life in humans is 120 days. In mammals, definitive erythropoiesis first occurs in the fetal liver with progenitor cells from the yolk sac (1). Within the fetal liver and the adult bone marrow, hematopoietic cells are formed continuously from a small population of pluripotent stem cells that generate progenitors committed to one or a few hematopoietic lineages (Figure 1). In the erythroid lineage, the earliest committed progenitors identified ex vivo are the slowly proliferating burst-forming unit–erythroids (BFU-E). Early BFU-E cells divide and further differentiate through the mature BFU-E stage into rapidly dividing colony-forming unit–erythroids (CFU-E) (2). CFU-E progenitors divide three to five times over 2–3 days as they differentiate and undergo many substantial changes, including a decrease in cell size, chromatin condensation, and hemoglobinization, leading up to their enucleation and expulsion of other organelles (3).

FIGURE 1. Formation of blood cells from hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow.

FIGURE 1

Pluripotent long- term reconstituting stem cells may divide symmetrically to self-renew or divide asymmetrically to form a myeloid or lymphoid progenitor cell and a daughter cell that is pluripotent like the parental stem cell. Depending on the types and amounts of cytokines present, the myeloid and lymphoid progenitor cells undergo rapid rounds of cell division and generate different types of unipotent precursor cells, which are incapable of self-renewal. Unipotent precursor cells respond to one or a few specific cytokines, and are detected by their ability to form colonies containing the differentiated cell types shown at right, measured as colony-forming units (CFU-s). (Adapted from (33)).

Each branch of the cell lineage tree has different cytokine regulators, allowing exquisite control of the production of specific cells types, and here we summarize the ways in which red cell production is regulated. Short- term production of red cells is controlled largely by erythropoietin (Epo), a kidney - derived hormone that is induced under hypoxic conditions and that stimulates terminal proliferation and differentiation of CFU-E progenitors (4). BFU-E cells respond to many hormones additional to Epo, including SCF, IGF-1, corticosteroids, IL-3, and IL-6. It is not known which cells in the fetal liver or adult bone marrow produce these cytokines, or how they interact to regulate the division of BFU-E cells and control their self- renewal and their ability to differentiate into more mature CFU-E progenitors. In cases of chronic erythroid stress, such as during hemolysis, the number of CFU-E progenitors is insufficient to produce the needed red cells even under high Epo levels, and the body responds by producing more of these progenitors (5). Here we discuss recent evidence that glucocorticoids and other stress hormones stimulate limited self-renewal of early BFU-E erythroid progenitors and thus increase the output of CFU-Es. Finally, we discuss factors that stimulate self- renewal of hematopoietic cells to produce more progenitors of all hematopoietic lineages.

Because of space limitations, and since this review is meant to summarize a talk by HL at the IUBMB meeting in Melbourne in October 2010, we focus on work from our own laboratory; our heartfelt apologies go to those whose important work we are unable to cite.

Terminal proliferation and differentiation of CFU-E erythroid progenitors

Erythropoietin has long been understood to be the major factor governing erythropoiesis and its role in regulating the expansion, differentiation, apoptosis, and activation of erythroid specific genes is well characterized (4). The first phase of CFU-E erythroid differentiation is highly Epo dependent, whereas later stages are no longer dependent on Epo (6). Consistent with this, Epo receptors are lost as erythroid progenitors undergo terminal proliferation and differentiation (7). This raises the question of what other signals, if any, these differentiating erythroblasts require to support terminal proliferation, differentiation, and enucleation.

Recently we demonstrated the importance of the extracellular matrix protein fibronectin in erythropoiesis (8). By culturing fetal liver CFU-E erythroid progenitors we showed that fibronectin and Epo regulate erythroid proliferation in temporally distinct steps. During the first day in culture CFU-E erythroid progenitor cells undergo two divisions, upregulate the transferrin receptor, and begin expression of Ter119 and several hundred other erythroid- important genes. This stage requires Epo but is independent of fibronectin. During the second day there are 2–3 rapid cell divisions with short or absent G1 and G2 stages; most cells are in S or M. There is complete repression of all gene transcription, chromatin condensation, nuclear condensation, and enucleation. Adhesion to fibronectin, but not the presence of Epo, is essential for these last 2 – 3 terminal cell divisions. In each phase, Epo and fibronectin promote expansion by preventing apoptosis, in part through inducing bcl-xL expression.

We showed that α4, α5, and β1 are the principal integrins expressed on erythroid progenitors; their downregulation during erythropoiesis parallels the loss of cell adhesion to fibronectin and likely accounts for the release of mature cells from the marrow into the circulation. Culturing erythroid progenitors on recombinant fibronectin fragments revealed that only substrates that engage α4β1 integrin support normal terminal proliferation. Taken together, these data suggest a two-phase model for growth factor and extracellular matrix regulation of erythropoiesis, with an early Epo-dependent, integrin-independent phase followed by an Epo-independent, α4β1 integrin-dependent phase.

Binding of Epo to Epo receptors (EpoRs) on the surface of erythroid progenitors triggers activation of multiple intracellular signal transduction pathways, including the Stat5 (Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5), Phosphoinositide -3 kinase/Akt, and Shc/Ras/Mitogen-Activated Kinase (MAPK) pathways. Elimination of either of the first two pathways leads to significant apoptosis of early progenitors and reduced output of erythrocytes (9). In contrast, blocking the Ras/ MAPK pathway has only subtle effects on terminal erythropoiesis (10).

Our studies on Stat5a−/−5b−/− mice were very revealing in uncovering not only the cellular role of this factor in erythropoiesis, but also the regulation of red cell production by expansion of earlier progenitor and stem cell populations. Stat5 is a latent cytoplasmic transcription factor activated by EpoR as well as many other hematopoietic and non-hematopoietic cytokine receptors. Following EpoR activation, Stat5 binds to phosphorylated tyrosines on EpoR, and itself becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated. This results in its dimerization and translocation to the nucleus where it initiates transcription of target genes. Known Stat5 targets include tissue-specific genes as well as genes regulating cell growth. We showed in a number of erythroid and hematopoietic cell lines that Stat5 induces the immediate early expression of the anti-apoptotic gene bcl-xL, by directly binding to Stat5 consensus sites in the bcl-x gene. Consistent with this, Stat5 has an anti-apoptotic effect in erythroid cell lines, and dominant negative Stat5 molecules increased apoptosis and inhibited growth of cultured fetal liver erythroid progenitors (11).

However, many adult Stat5a−/−Stat5b−/− mice have a normal or near- normal steady-state hematocrit (12). How then could this factor be crucial for red cell production? To resolve this dilemma, we showed that Stat5 is essential for the high erythropoietic rate during fetal development. Stat5a−/−Stat5b−/− embryos are severely anemic; erythroid progenitors are present in low numbers, show higher levels of apoptosis, and are less responsive to Epo. This is mediated in part by reduced accumulation of the bcl-xL protein (11).

Subsequently we confirmed that some adult Stat5a−/−5b−/− mice have a near-normal hematocrit but showed that they are deficient in generating high erythropoietic rates in response to stress and have very high endogenous levels of Epo in the blood. Further, many adult Stat5a−/−5b−/− mice have persistent anemia in spite of a marked compensatory expansion in their erythropoietic tissue leading to gross expansion of the spleen and its conversion largely to a erythropoietic organ. Analysis of erythroblast maturation in Stat5a−/−5b−/− hematopoietic tissue showed a dramatic increase in early erythroblast numbers, but these fail to progress in differentiation and undergo apoptosis. Decreased expression of bcl-xL and increased apoptosis in Stat5a−/−5b−/− early erythroblasts correlate with the degree of anemia (13). Hence, Stat5 indeed controls a rate-determining step regulating early erythroblast survival, leading to induction or repression of multiple genes in a defined temporal order.

Thus the reason that many adult Stat5a−/−5b−/− mice have normal or near normal red cell levels relates to their ability to greatly increase the numbers of CFU-E progenitor cells. Despite the fact that many undergo apoptosis in spite of the extremely high level of Epo, enough are able to proliferate and differentiate to generate near normal levels of red cells. This response to the chronic stress of anemia is termed stress erythropoiesis.

Stress erythropoiesis: regulated expansion of erythroid progenitors

In situations of severe loss of red blood cells mammals and birds respond by the process known as stress erythropoiesis (SE). Unlike steady-state erythropoiesis, which is largely regulated by Epo, SE also requires stem cell factor (SCF) and glucocorticoids (GCs) (1416). Cortisol is the most abundant natural GC, a steroid stress hormone that regulates inflammatory responses and glucose metabolism. It is well documented that release of cortisol from the adrenal glands is increased during conditions of stress erythropoiesis, such as sepsis or severe trauma (17). Direct effects of cortisol on erythropoiesis are demonstrated, by polycythemia as an early clinical manifestation of Cushing's syndrome, (18) and by the therapeutic effect of prednisone in patients with the red cell progenitor disorder Diamond-Blackfan Anemia (DBA) (19). Although the molecular events following glucocorticoid receptor activation in inflammation and metabolism are well understood (20), relatively little is known of how GCs promote red cell formation during SE.

The process of SE can be replicated and studied in vitro, by culturing erythroid progenitors in medium containing SCF, Dexamethasone (Dex) and Epo. Both In vitro proliferation of FL erythroblasts and in vivo SE are severely decreased by a mutation in the glucocorticoid receptor that disrupts dimerization. (14, 21) The stimulatory effects of GCs on red cell production therefore likely requires glucocorticoid receptor dimerization, which is required for efficient transactivation of promoters with glucocorticoid receptor element (GRE) full-sites but which may also be necessary for repression at negative GRE full-sites (20). Although SE has been extensively studied, the target cell and the physiological effects of GCs have been elusive. In work under review (Flygare, J. and H. Lodish), we established two FACS-based methods to separate and purify BFU-E and CFU-E cells from mouse fetal liver. By culturing these cells in the presence of SCF and IGF-1, we demonstrated that GCs induce limited self-renewal of BFU-E cells, and not of CFU-E cells or erythroblasts. GCs thereby protect BFU-E cells from exhaustion, and in parallel over time they increase the number of CFU-E cells formed from each BFU-E greater than 10-fold. Thus we propose a physiological model of stress erythropoiesis where increased levels of GCs help maintain the earliest erythroid progenitors, increase CFU-E output, and at the same time stimulate terminal differentiation, thus promoting both a rapid and long-lasting increase in red blood cell production. Identification of BFU-Es as the target cell of GCs in SE, together with our novel method to isolate BFU-Es, will allow studies towards development of novel erythropoiesis stimulating agents that act by promoting SE by the same mechanisms employed by GCs.

Regulation of hematopoietic stem cell expansion

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are defined by their ability to self-renew and to differentiate into all blood cell types. In vivo these cells have at least four fates: self-renewal, cell death (apoptosis), differentiation, and mobilization. They reside in specialized niches and receive signals - both via secreted and cell surface proteins – from surrounding stromal cells, but the identity of most of these signals and the effects they have on HSCs is largely unknown (22, 23). In adults HSCs are largely quiescent and reside in two well- characterized bone marrow niches – one apposed to osteoblasts on the endosteal surface, and the other adjacent to or near the sinusoids (2426). Except for osteoblasts, the identity of other cells in the niche is not known, and the identity of most of the signals produced by these cells is also unknown (2729).

Our work focuses on defining the niche in fetal liver, where HSCs are rapidly expanding to produce the large numbers of hematopoietic progenitor and differentiated cells. To begin we identified a novel cell population that supports ex vivo expansion of bone marrow HSCs - CD3+ cells isolated from Embryonic Day 15 (E15) fetal livers (30). DNA array experiments showed that, among other proteins, insulin - like growth factor 2 (IGF - 2) and Angiopoietin- like proteins 2 (Angptl2) and 3 (Angptl3) are specifically expressed in these cells but not in several cell types that do not support HSC expansion. We then developed a simple serum- free culture system for bone marrow HSCs using low levels of SCF, TPO, FGF-1, IGF-2 and Angptl2 or Angptl3. As measured by competitive repopulation analyses, there was a 24 to 30 fold increase in numbers of long-term repopulating HSCs (LT-HSC) after 10 days of culture (31). A similar cocktail of growth factors supported a ~20 fold expansion ex vivo of human cord blood HSCs (32).

In trying to characterize the ~2% of fetal liver cells reactive with an anti-CD3ε monoclonal antibody and that support ex vivo expansion of both fetal liver and bone marrow HSCs, we realized that these cells actually do not express any CD3 protein. Neither do they express any other proteins characteristic of T cells. These are a defined subset of fetal liver cells and we do not know what protein(s) made by them react with the supposedly specific anti- CD3ε monoclonal antibody.

Recently we were able to purify these same HSC- supportive stromal cells based on the surface phenotype of SCF+DLK+ (Chou, S. and H. Lodish, unpublished). These are the principal fetal liver cells that express not only Angiopoietin- like 3, and IGF-2, but also SCF and Thrombopoietin, two other growth factors important for HSC expansion. They are also the principal fetal liver cells that express CXCL12, a factor required for HSC homing, and also α-fetoprotein (AFP), indicating they are fetal hepatoblasts. Immunocytochemistry shows that >93% of the SCF+ cells express DLK and Angptl3, and about a third of the SCF+ cells also expresses CXCL12. Thus SCF+DLK+ cells are a highly homogenous population that express a complete set of factors for HSC expansion and are the hepatoblast stromal cells that support HSC expansion in the fetal liver. Although we have not yet determined whether these SCF+DLK+ stromal cells physically interact with HSCs, the fact they express membrane-bound forms of DLK and SCF on their surface does suggest they are able to interact with HSCs via the binding between the SCF receptor c-kit and the still unknown receptor for DLK on HSCs.

We do not know whether these SCF+DLK+ cells are present in adult bone marrow. Nor do we know the identity of the factors that stimulate self-renewal of HSCs in bone marrow. Several of the factors we showed support ex vivo expansion of HSCs – Tpo and Angptl3 – continue to be made by adult liver at levels similar to that in fetal liver (Chou, S. and H. Lodish, unpublished). But we do not know whether these hormones function systemically to regulate HSCs in the bone marrow.

Thus our work showed that four key growth factors - SCF, TPO, IGF-2 and Angptl3 – are made by the same fetal liver cell, and synergize to support maximum expansion of HSCs. But we do not know the function of each of these individual growth factors on hematopoietic stem cells. Do they stimulate division, prevent apoptosis, or prevent differentiation of daughter cells? We need to discover the signal transduction pathways induced in hematopoietic stem cells by each of these growth factors and elucidate how these signaling pathways interact to support HSC self renewal. Finally, we need to understand how hematopoietic stem cells interpret these signals and decide whether to divide, differentiate, undergo apoptosis, or simply remain quiescent.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by NIH grants P01 HL 32262 and DK067356 and a research grant from Amgen, Inc. to H.F.L. JF was supported by a fellowship from the Swedish Research Council and stipends from Maja och Hjalmar Leanders Stiftelse and The Sweden-America Foundation. S.C. was supported by an NIH NRSA fellowship

References

  • 1.Palis J, Robertson S, Kennedy M, Wall C, Keller G. Development of erythroid and myeloid progenitors in the yolk sac and embryo proper of the mouse. Development. 1999;126(22):5073–84. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.22.5073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Elliott S, Pham E, Macdougall IC. Erythropoietins: a common mechanism of action. Exp Hematol. 2008;36(12):1573–84. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fawcett DW, J. RP. Bloom & Fawcett: Concise Histology. In: Fawcett DW, J. RP, editors. Hematopoiesis. 1st ed. Arnold Publishers; 1997. pp. 84–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Molineux G, Foote M, Elliott S. Erythropoiesis and Eythropoietins. Second Edition Birkhauser; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dolznig H, Grebien F, Deiner EM, Stangl K, Kolbus A, Habermann B, Kerenyi MA, Kieslinger M, Moriggl R, Beug H, Mullner EW. Erythroid progenitor renewal versus differentiation: genetic evidence for cell autonomous, essential functions of EpoR, Stat5 and the GR. Oncogene. 2006;25(20):2890–900. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wu H, Liu X, Jaenisch R, Lodish HF. Generation of committed erythroid BFU-E and CFU-E progenitors does not require erythropoietin or the erythropoietin receptor. Cell. 1995;83(1):59–67. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90234-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang J, Socolovsky M, Gross AW, Lodish HF. Role of Ras signaling in erythroid differentiation of mouse fetal liver cells: functional analysis by a flow cytometry-based novel culture system. Blood. 2003;102(12):3938–46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-05-1479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Eshghi S, Vogelezang MG, Hynes RO, Griffith LG, Lodish HF. Alpha4beta1 integrin and erythropoietin mediate temporally distinct steps in erythropoiesis: integrins in red cell development. J Cell Biol. 2007;177(5):871–80. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200702080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lodish HF, Ghaffari S, Socolovsky M, Tong W, Zhang J. Signaling by the Erythropoietin Receptor. In: Molineux G, Foote M, Elliott S, editors. Erythropoiesis and Eythropoietins. Second Edition Birkhauser; 2009. pp. 155–174. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang J, Lodish HF. Endogenous K-ras signaling in erythroid differentiation. Cell Cycle. 2007;6(16):1970–3. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.16.4577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Socolovsky M, Fallon AE, Wang S, Brugnara C, Lodish HF. Fetal anemia and apoptosis of red cell progenitors in Stat5a−/−5b−/− mice: a direct role for Stat5 in Bcl-X(L) induction. Cell. 1999;98(2):181–91. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81013-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Teglund S, McKay C, Schuetz E, van Deursen JM, Stravopodis D, Wang D, Brown M, Bonder S, Grosveld G, Ihle JN. Stat5a and Stat5b proteins have essential and nonessential, or redundant, roles in cytokine responses. Cell. 1998;93:841–850. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81444-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Socolovsky M, Nam H, Fleming MD, Haase VH, Brugnara C, Lodish HF. Ineffective erythropoiesis in Stat5a(−/−)5b(−/−) mice due to decreased survival of early erythroblasts. Blood. 2001;98(12):3261–73. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.12.3261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bauer A, Tronche F, Wessely O, Kellendonk C, Reichardt HM, Steinlein P, Schutz G, Beug H. The glucocorticoid receptor isrequired for stress erythropoiesis. Genes Dev. 1999;13(22):2996–3002. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.22.2996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wessely O, Deiner EM, Beug H, von Lindern M. The glucocorticoid receptor is a key regulator of the decision between self-renewal and differentiation in erythroid progenitors. EMBO J. 1997;16(2):267–80. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.2.267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kolbus A, Blazquez-Domingo M, Carotta S, Bakker W, Luedemann S, von Lindern M, Steinlein P, Beug H. Cooperative signaling between cytokine receptors and the glucocorticoid receptor in the expansion of erythroid progenitors: molecular analysis by expression profiling. Blood. 2003;102(9):3136–46. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sapolsky RM, Romero LM, Munck AU. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr Rev. 2000;21(1):55–89. doi: 10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dusek T, Kastelan D, Solak M, Basic Kinda S, Aganovic I, Korsic M. Polycythemia as the first manifestation of Cushing's disease. J Endocrinol Invest. 2008;31(10):940. doi: 10.1007/BF03346446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Flygare J, Karlsson S. Diamond-Blackfan anemia: erythropoiesis lost in translation. Blood. 2007;109(8):3152–4. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-09-001222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Newton R, Holden NS. Separating transrepression and transactivation: a distressing divorce for the glucocorticoid receptor? Mol Pharmacol. 2007;72(4):799–809. doi: 10.1124/mol.107.038794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Reichardt HM, Kaestner KH, Tuckermann J, Kretz O, Wessely O, Bock R, Gass P, Schmid W, Herrlich P, Angel P, Schutz G. DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor is not essential for survival. Cell. 1998;93(4):531–41. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81183-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Adams GB, Scadden DT. The hematopoietic stem cell in its place. Nat Immunol. 2006;7(4):333–7. doi: 10.1038/ni1331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Martinez-Agosto JA, Mikkola HK, Hartenstein V, Banerjee U. The hematopoietic stem cell and its niche: a comparative view. Genes Dev. 2007;21(23):3044–60. doi: 10.1101/gad.1602607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kiel MJ, Morrison SJ. Uncertainty in the niches that maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(4):290–301. doi: 10.1038/nri2279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wilson A, Trumpp A. Bone-marrow haematopoietic-stem-cell niches. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(2):93–106. doi: 10.1038/nri1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Taichman RS. Blood and bone: two tissues whose fates are intertwined to create the hematopoietic stem-cell niche. Blood. 2005;105(7):2631–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Larsson J, Scadden D. Nervous activity in a stem cell niche. Cell. 2006;124(2):253–5. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Garrett RW, Emerson SG. Bone and blood vessels: the hard and the soft of hematopoietic stem cell niches. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4(6):503–6. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Askmyr M, Sims NA, Martin TJ, Purton LE. What is the true nature of the osteoblastic hematopoietic stem cell niche? Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009;20(6):303–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2009.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhang CC, Lodish HF. Insulin-like growth factor 2 expressed in a novel fetal liver cell population is a growth factor for hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 2004;103(7):2513–21. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang CC, Kaba M, Ge G, Xie K, Tong W, Hug C, Lodish HF. Angiopoietin-like proteins stimulate ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med. 2006;12(2):240–5. doi: 10.1038/nm1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang CC, Kaba M, Iizuka S, Huynh H, Lodish HF. Angiopoietin-like 5 and IGFBP2 stimulate ex vivo expansion of human cord blood hematopoietic stem cells as assayed by NOD/SCID transplantation. Blood. 2008;111(7):3415–23. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-11-122119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Socolovsky M, Lodish HF, Daley GQ. Control of hematopoietic differentiation: lack of specificity in signaling by cytokine receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(12):6573–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES