Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Dis. 2010 May;38(2):145–147. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.03.004

Genes and the long and winding road to cortical construction and cognition

M Elizabeth Ross 1, Dan Geschwind 2
PMCID: PMC2894613  NIHMSID: NIHMS203834  PMID: 20381768

Over the last half century an enormous synergy has emerged between the direct genetic study of disordered human brain development and basic developmental neurobiology. Nowhere is this more true than in conditions that involve abnormalities in cognition and behavior, where a knowledge of molecular etiology provides a concrete starting point for the complex journey from stem or progenitor cell to cortical circuit to cognition (Rakic and Goldman 1982; Caviness and Rakic 1995). In this issue of NBD, we attempt to highlight this synergy by providing a collection of 5 reviews focusing on different areas at the intersection between developmental neurobiology and disease.

Since the earliest days of experimental embryology, investigators have been fascinated by the problem of how a structure as complicated as brain can construct itself (Schaper, 1897; Louis and Stapf, 2001; Spemann and Mangold, 2001), especially the human cerebral cortex (Rakic 2009). Starting from a single cell, then advancing to a cluster of amorphous cells, the vertebrate embryo begins to specify neural tissue as a sheet of specialized ectoderm whose edges rise up and roll into a tube in a process called neurulation. As the neural tube closes, pseudo-stratified neural epithelial cells comprising the wall of the tube move their nuclei basally (outward) to synthesize new DNA and translocate apically (to the center) to split into daughter cells in M-phase at the surface of what will become either the central aqueduct that closes off in the mature spinal cord or the ventricular system that remains open in the forebrain and brainstem (Sauer and Chittenden, 1959). In the process, cell proliferation, strategic apoptosis and cell shape changes enabled by manipulation of the cytoskeleton accomplish the morphogenesis that maps out the rudimentary forebrain, hindbrain, brainstem and spinal cord. In the midst of all this cellular pushing and shoving, the cerebral cortex begins to emerge as the earliest neurons free themselves from the neural epithelium. Rebelling against the constraints of interkinetic nuclear migration, progenitor cells in the forebrain break away from the pseudo-stratified epithelium to form a secondary proliferative zone of cells that undergo less regimented divisions that amplify neural numbers (1970; Bystron et al., 2008). In higher vertebrates, expansion of these subventricular, transit amplifying divisions will force young neurons and glia as they migrate away from their place of origin to create folds and undulations of the overlying cortex (Martinez-Cerdeno et al., 2006). And all the while, even as they move out to take up positions in the forming cortex, migrating neurons leave behind and send out axons and growth cones that seek other neuronal targets they have yet to know, but are already programmed to find or die (Hamburger, 1992). Then as neurons take their rightful place, they elaborate dendritic tree-like arbors in recognizable configurations sufficiently stereotyped to enable the synthesis of neuronal classifications, of which many forms have been appreciated since the turn of the last century (Ramon y Cajal, 1911; Ascoli et al., 2008).

We now enjoy a growing mechanistic understanding of the cellular framework of cortical construction, the hardware of cognition and behavior. However, it is only in the last twenty years or so that the molecular elements that underlie the processes involved in brain formation have been coming to light. And this story, often driven by study of clinical disorders, is more fascinating than ever imagined. The five articles in this special issue are not intended to provide a comprehensive overview of these advances. Rather, they discuss selected examples of some intriguing insights that take us from brain construction to higher cortical function. These have been chosen from the perspective of molecular insights that have been gained from the study of clinically recognized disorders of brain, and in particular cerebral cortex, formation.

This issue starts with a consideration of the complexities of progenitor proliferation and patterning of gene expression in developing brain, exemplified by the Wnt signaling pathways (Freese et al.). The versatility and complexity of Wnt signaling is remarkable, ranging from regional patterning of many key neural structures including the hippocampus, to axon pathfinding, synapse formation and adult neurogenesis. Here, very basic molecular and cell biology, rather than study of human disorders, has been at the root of much progress in decoding this extremely complex set of interconnected pathways. It is remarkable that despite having a central role in many fundamental neurodevelopmental pathways, clinical evidence for direct involvement of Wnt pathway component mutations in disordered human neurodevelopment, as opposed to dementia or cancer (Logan and Nusse 2004), remains relatively sparse. Nevertheless, animal models suggest that Wnt pathway gene malfunction may be at the core of human cases of neural tube defects (Carter et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2006a; Wang et al., 2006b) and cortical malformations associated with mental retardation (Xu et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2006; Hildebrandt and Zhou, 2007). Mouse models demonstrate a significant role for Wnt signaling in formation of the corpus callosum, suggesting that screening Wnt pathway genes in human patients with various forms of callosal agenesis may prove fruitful as well. The challenge of such an approach is that the diversity and complexity of Wnt signaling requires screening large numbers of genes.

Next, a discussion of the neuronal migration syndromes in human subjects highlights the identification, through clinical genetic investigation, of critical genes whose impact span proliferation, migration, axon extension and connectivity (Guerrini and Parrini). Here, study of several rare human disorders has greatly illuminated our understanding of basic processes of cortical development. In parallel with the early role of mouse mutants toward understanding neuronal migration and cortical histogenesis (Caviness and Rakic 1982; Sidman, 1983), the ability to categorize and study migration disorders in human clinical populations, made possible by advances in neuroimaging, has led to a revolution in our understanding of the molecules involved in neuronal profileration and migration (Ross and Walsh, 2001; Gupta et al., 2002; Barkovich et al., 2005; Ross, in press). One example among many described by Guerrini and Parrini is the discovery of LIS1 and DCX as causes of lissencephaly and subcortical band heterotopia, which revealed a signaling pathway highlighting the central role of cytoskeletal dynamics in neuronal migration. Another theme here is pleiotropy, in which a variety of human syndromes can be caused by mutations in the same gene. In this way, detailed clinical observations and phenotyping followed by translational genetic work have greatly informed basic cell biology. One observation whose molecular basis is not well understood is the relative focality of certain neuronal migration disorders, such as forms of polymicrogyria (PMG) associated with language dysfunction, or relative a-p gradients of migratory defects associated with DCX and LIS1 mutations. In some cases, what appear to be relatively focal events actually disrupt more broadly distributed circuits, leading to more widespread cortical dysfunction. Such developmental disconnection has been posited to underlie autism (Geschwind and Levitt, 2007) and may also contribute to deficits in language and other aspects of higher cognition in patients with these known migration syndromes.

Another emerging theme in the study of complex neuropsychiatric disorders has been the unexpected contribution of genes that were first recognized in association with rare brain malformations. Jouberts syndrome, which involves severe cerebellar-brainstem malformations, is also among one of several syndromic disorders strongly associated with autism (Abrahams and Geschwind, 2008; Alvarez Ruetero et al. 2008) and schizophrenia (Amann-Zalcenstein et al., 2006). The neural mechanism of this Jouberts-ASD association is unknown, but new data highlights the disruption of primary cilia function in Joubert Syndrome pathophysiology. This has illuminated new features of extracellular signaling events that support cross-talk among critical developmental signaling pathways, such as Wnt and SHH, and that promote neurogenesis, cell polarity, and axonal guidance (Lee and Gleeson). The presence of severe defects in decussation of major long tracts in patients with Jouberts is also intriguing, especially considering the known role of cilia in midline signals that underlie the generation of lateralized structures in vertebrates (Basu and Bruekner, 2008; Hirokawa et al. 2006). Study of this Mendelian disorder promises to help elucidate how these processes relate to complex features of human brain development and cognition.

One of the most complex functions supported by a cerebral cortex is human language. Basic human genetic studies of reading, as well as spoken language have yielded diverse functional categories of implicated genes, ranging from transcription factors to cell-adhesion molecules (Newbury et al. 2010, Alarcon et al. 2008, Vernes et al. 2008). In this issue, Gabel et al. introduce the surprisingly prevalent disorders affecting reading ability (Gabel et al.). The recent evidence suggests that reading disability (RD) is associated with neuronal migration impairments that are akin, though in much milder form, to the brain malformations discussed in several of the accompanying articles. This work reveals a remarkable convergence of the neuropathology observed of RD in small cohorts of human subjects, and the deficits in neuronal migration observed in mouse models when genes recently associated with RD are perturbed. Both ectopia and periventricular nodular heterotopias are observed in human pathological material from patients with a history of RD, and in RNAi mediated knockdown of DYCX1C1 in mice. Related, but not identical neuronal migration deficits are observed with knockdown of DCDC2 and KIAA0319 in mice, two other genes associated with RD in humans. Here again, is an example of how clinical, pathological and genetic studies in humans have led to a new cadre of genes with apparently important roles in cortical development, specifically neuronal migration. How such events lead to relatively focal disruption of reading and language, sparing most other cognitive functions remains an important challenge to the field. Perhaps observations in allied, but more severe disorders of human neuronal migration, such as PMG, can work synergistically to inform a broader understanding of language circuit development.

Finally, recent advances in genomics have made it possible to approach the multi-factorial, complex genetic interactions that influence higher integrative functioning and are discussed in the context of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (Hogart et al.). Many of the issues faced in identifying the genetic factors predisposing to ASD are exemplified in the genomic disorders of chromosome 15q11-q13, in which gene duplications, deletions and imprinted alleles have been associated with autistic features and indicated regional genes that may contribute to autism susceptibility. Here again, new findings emphasize the important contribution of chromosomal structural variation to ASD (Sebat et al., 2007, Abrahams and Geschwind, 2008; Bucan et al., 2009). The majority of patients with maternally inherited duplications of the 15q11-13 region have autistic symptoms, making it among the most commonly recognized genetic causes of ASD (Hogart et al.; Abrahams and Geschwind, 2008). In addition to genes that are in the duplication or deletion, one has to consider nearby genes, as the effects of a structural chromosomal abnormality may typically dysregulate genes a half a million base pairs distant. Here, the connection between specific genes and cognition is complicated by the involvement of several genes, including GABARB3 and UBE3A, the latter implicated in the pathophysiology of Angelman syndrome (discussed in Hogart et al.). Since the duplication varies in size, Hogart et al. emphasize that careful and detailed phenotyping that permits sophisticated genotype-phenotype correlation is necessary to elucidate the gene-brain-cognition relationships that lead to ASD.

These articles highlight the capacity for investigation of morphological disruptions of human brain, genetics and genomics to identify genes and genetic interactions that can impact cortical function in subtle ways. Basic neuro-developmental processes, such as regionalization and neuronal migration are implicated in several clinically distinct disorders. How such diverse clinical phenotypes relate to these basic mechanisms remains an exciting frontier of this research. In the future, as pathogenic mechanisms are better understood, one can imagine cognitive disease classifications based on etiology (“cause”), such as distinct disorders of neural migration, or cell fate, which could presumably share molecularly guided therapies more successfully than therapies targeting current disease classifications based on observed neurobehavioral phenotypes (“outcome”). Furthermore, development does not end in childhood or puberty. Many developmental pathways are also implicated in later onset disorders involving neurodegeneration (e.g. Wexler and Geschwind, 2006; Rogers and Schor, in press). Thus early developmental events might lead to changes in circuit patterning or resilience that leaves certain cell types or regions vulnerable to later neurodegeneration (Wexler and Geschwind, 2006). We hope that these discussions will heighten interest in examinations of the ways in which genes that are involved in constructing cortex impact its later function as well.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Contributor Information

M. Elizabeth Ross, Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Development Vice Chair for Research, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY.

Dan Geschwind, Neurology and Psychiatry Gordon and Virginia MacDonald Distinguished Professor of Human Genetics David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA.

References

  1. Embryonic vertebrate central nervous system: revised terminology. The Boulder Committee. Anat Rec. 1970;166:257–261. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091660214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrahams BS, Geschwind DH. Advances in autism genetics: on the threshold of a new neurobiology. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9:341–355. doi: 10.1038/nrg2346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alarcón M, Abrahams BS, Stone JL, Duvall JA, Perederiy JV, Bomar JM, Sebat J, Wigler M, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH, Nelson SF, Cantor RM, Geschwind DH. Linkage, association, and gene-expression analyses identify CNTNAP2 as an autism-susceptibility gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2008;82:150–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Amann-Zalcenstein D, Avidan N, Kanyas K, Ebstein RP, Kohn Y, Hamdan A, Ben-Asher E, Karni O, Mujaheed M, Segman RH, Maier W, Macciardi F, Beckmann JS, Lancet D, Lerer B. AHI1, a pivotal neurodevelopmental gene, and C6orf217 are associated with susceptibility to schizophrenia. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14(10):1111–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ascoli GA, Alonso-Nanclares L, Anderson SA, Barrionuevo G, Benavides-Piccione R, Burkhalter A, Buzsaki G, Cauli B, Defelipe J, Fairen A, Feldmeyer D, Fishell G, Fregnac Y, Freund TF, Gardner D, Gardner EP, Goldberg JH, Helmstaedter M, Hestrin S, Karube F, Kisvarday ZF, Lambolez B, Lewis DA, Marin O, Markram H, Munoz A, Packer A, Petersen CC, Rockland KS, Rossier J, Rudy B, Somogyi P, Staiger JF, Tamas G, Thomson AM, Toledo-Rodriguez M, Wang Y, West DC, Yuste R. Petilla terminology: nomenclature of features of GABAergic interneurons of the cerebral cortex. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:557–568. doi: 10.1038/nrn2402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barkovich AJ, Kuzniecky RI, Jackson GD, Guerrini R, Dobyns WB. A developmental and genetic classification for malformations of cortical development. Neurology. 2005;65:1873–1887. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000183747.05269.2d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Basu B, Brueckner M. Cilia multifunctional organelles at the center of vertebrate left-right asymmetry. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2008;85:151–74. doi: 10.1016/S0070-2153(08)00806-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bucan M, Abrahams BS, Wang K, Glessner JT, Herman EI, Sonnenblick LI, Alvarez Retuerto AI, Imielinski M, Hadley D, Bradfield JP, Kim C, Gidaya NB, Lindquist I, Hutman T, Sigman M, Kustanovich V, Lajonchere CM, Singleton A, Kim J, Wassink TH, McMahon WM, Owley T, Sweeney JA, Coon H, Nurnberger JI, Li M, Cantor RM, Minshew NJ, Sutcliffe JS, Cook EH, Dawson G, Buxbaum JD, Grant SF, Schellenberg GD, Geschwind DH, Hakonarson H. Genome-wide analyses of exonic copy number variants in a family-based study point to novel autism susceptibility genes. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bystron I, Blakemore C, Rakic P. Development of the human cerebral cortex: Boulder Committee revisited. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:110–122. doi: 10.1038/nrn2252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Carter M, Chen X, Slowinska B, Minnerath S, Glickstein S, Shi L, Campagne F, Weinstein H, Ross ME. Crooked tail (Cd) model of human folate-responsive neural tube defects is mutated in Wnt coreceptor lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:12843–12848. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501963102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Caviness V. Neocortical histogenesis in normal and reeler mice: a developmental study based on [3H]thymidine autoradiography. Dev Brain Res. 1982;4:293–302. doi: 10.1016/0165-3806(82)90141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Caviness VS, Jr, Rakic P. Mechanisms of cortical development: a view from mutations in mice. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1978;1:297–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.01.030178.001501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta A, Tsai LH, Wynshaw-Boris A. Life is a journey: a genetic look at neocortical development. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3:342–355. doi: 10.1038/nrg799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hamburger V. History of the discovery of neuronal death in embryos. J Neurobiol. 1992;23:1116–1123. doi: 10.1002/neu.480230904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hildebrandt F, Zhou W. Nephronophthisis-associated ciliopathies. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:1855–1871. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006121344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hirokawa N, Tanaka Y, Okada Y, Takeda S. Nodal flow and the generation of left-right asymmetry. Cell. 2006;125(1):33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Logan CY, Nusse R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2004;20:781–810. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.010403.113126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Louis ED, Stapf C. Unraveling the neuron jungle: the 1879-1886 publications by Wilhelm His on the embryological development of the human brain. Arch Neurol. 2001;58:1932–1935. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.11.1932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Martinez-Cerdeno V, Noctor SC, Kriegstein AR. The role of intermediate progenitor cells in the evolutionary expansion of the cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2006;16(Suppl 1):i152–161. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhk017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Newbury DF, Fisher SE, Monaco AP. Recent advances in the genetics of language impairment. Genome Med. 2010;2(1):6. doi: 10.1186/gm127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rakic P, Caviness VS., Jr Cortical development: view from neurological mutants two decades later. Neuron. 1995;14(6):1101–4. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90258-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Rakic P, Goldman-Rakic PS. The development and modifiability of the cerebral cortex. Overview. Neurosci Res Program Bull. 1982;20(4):433–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rakic P. Evolution of the neocortex: a perspective from developmental biology. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(10):724–35. doi: 10.1038/nrn2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ramon y, Cajal S. Histologie du system nerveux de l'homme et des vertebres. Maloine; Paris: 1911. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rogers D, Schor NF. The child is father to the man: Developmental roles for proteins of importance for neurodegenerative disease. Ann Neurol. doi: 10.1002/ana.21841. in press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ross ME. Microcephaly and its Association with Epilepsy. In: Shorvon, Guerrini, Andermann, editors. The Causes of Epilepsy: Common and Uncommon Causes in Adults and Children. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: in press. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ross ME, Walsh CA. Human brain malformations and their lessons for neuronal migration. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1041–1070. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Sauer ME, Chittenden AC. Deoxyribonucleic acid content of cell nuclei in the neural tube of the chick embryo: evidence for intermitotic migration of nuclei. Exptl cell res. 1959;16:1–6. doi: 10.1016/0014-4827(59)90189-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schaper A. The earliest differentiation in the central nervous system of vertebrates. Science. 1897;5:430–431. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sebat J, Lakshmi B, Malhotra D, Troge J, Lese-Martin C, Walsh T, Yamrom B, Yamrom B, Yoon S, Krasnitz A, Kendall J, Leotta A, Pai D, Zhang R, Lee YH, Hicks J, Spence SJ, Lee AT, Puura K, Lehtimaki T, Ledbetter D, Gregersen PK, Bregman J, Sutcliffe JS, Jobanputra V, Chung W, Warburton D, King MC, Skuse D, Geschwind DH, Gilliam TC, Ye K, Wigler M. Strong Association of De Novo Copy Number Mutations with Autism. Science. 2007 doi: 10.1126/science.1138659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sidman RL. Experimental Neurogenetics. In: Kety SS, P RL, Sidman LP, Mathysse SW, editors. Genetics of Neurological and Phychiatric Disorders. Raven Press; New York: 1983. pp. 19–46. [Google Scholar]
  32. Spemann H, Mangold H. Induction of embryonic primordia by implantation of organizers from a different species. 1923. Int J Dev Biol. 2001;45:13–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vernes SC, Newbury DF, Abrahams BS, Winchester L, Nicod J, Groszer M, Alarcón M, Oliver PL, Davies KE, Geschwind DH, Monaco AP, Fisher SE. A functional genetic link between distinct developmental language disorders. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(22):2337–45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang J, Hamblet NS, Mark S, Dickinson ME, Brinkman BC, Segil N, Fraser SE, Chen P, Wallingford JB, Wynshaw-Boris A. Dishevelled genes mediate a conserved mammalian PCP pathway to regulate convergent extension during neurulation. Development. 2006a;133:1767–1778. doi: 10.1242/dev.02347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wang Y, Guo N, Nathans J. The role of Frizzled3 and Frizzled6 in neural tube closure and in the planar polarity of inner-ear sensory hair cells. J Neurosci. 2006b;26:2147–2156. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4698-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wexler EM, Geschwind DH. Out FOXing Parkinson disease: where development meets neurodegeneration. PLoS Biol. 2007;(12):e334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xu Q, Wang Y, Dabdoub A, Smallwood PM, Williams J, Woods C, Kelley MW, Jiang L, Tasman W, Zhang K, Nathans J. Vascular development in the retina and inner ear: control by Norrin and Frizzled-4, a high-affinity ligand-receptor pair. Cell. 2004;116:883–895. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00216-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou CJ, Borello U, Rubenstein JL, Pleasure SJ. Neuronal production and precursor proliferation defects in the neocortex of mice with loss of function in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Neuroscience. 2006;142:1119–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES