Abstract
Diels-Alder adducts of chromones are shown to undergo an intramolecular [2π+2π] alkene-arene photocyclization, leading to a versatile polycyclic diene, which is capable of dimerization or can be introduced into a high yielding photoprotolytic oxametathetic sequence. This allows for an expeditious growth of molecular complexity over a few experimentally simple steps with stereochemistry being defined and locked at the very first Diels-Alder step. The overall reaction can potentially be utilized in Diversity-Oriented Synthesis as it allows for three or more diversity inputs furnishing novel unique polycyclic scaffolds, which can readily be decorated with a variety of functionalities and aromatic/heterocyclic pendants.
The Diels-Alder (D.-A.) adducts of 1,4-naphthoquinone with cyclic dienes were shown to undergo photoinduced [2+2], or [6+2], cycloaddition A → B, disrupting the aromatic system and furnishing a facially stereodifferentiated cyclohexadiene moiety. The original discovery is attributed to Filipescu2 and Kushner.3 In ensuing years the finding has sparked a flurry of research activity. Coxon and Marchand and others systematically studied facial selectivity in D.-A. reactions of B which primarily produced C (Scheme 1) as a result of an attack by a dienophile at the face decorated by the carbonyl groups,4 and several accounts of various acid and base catalyzed rearrangements involving either diene B or its D.-A. adducts have been published.5
Scheme 1.
In a related development, [2+2] intramolecular photocycloadditions in alkene-arene pairs or between two aromatic moieties were exploited by Prinzbach to access a spectacular array of polycyclic hydrocarbons, pagodanes.6
Given the facile access to the starting materials and potential benefits of the synthetic developments around the basic sequence shown in Scheme 1 it was somewhat surprising for us to realize that 1,4-naphthoquinones are the only aromatic ketones that are reported to form polycyclic dienes of type B in intramolecular [2+2] photo-cycloadditions.
It is conceivable that this limited variety has to do with the fact that very few benzo-fused aromatic ketones have been reported as good dienophiles for the first, i.e. D.-A. step (→ A). For example chromones (and even parent γ-pyrones) have received very little attention until about a decade ago, when Hsung reported the first stereoselective [4+2] cycloaddition reactions of 3-cyanochromone derivatives with electron-rich dienes.7
We have recently developed another high yielding tandem ground state – excited state [4π+2π]◦[2π+2π] reaction, where the second photochemical Paternò-Büchi step in a strained polycyclic molecular framework is accompanied by an acid-catalyzed fragmentation carried out in a one-pot fashion.8 This sequence amounts to photoprotolytic oxametathesis because the intermittent oxetane, formed at the Paternò-Büchi step, undergoes acid-catalyzed cycloreversion producing an alternative pair of the alkene and the carbonyl compound, similar to pyrolytic olefin-carbonyl metathesis first reported by Jones.9
Our rationale for the present study was (i) to evaluate the feasibility of the intramolecular [2+2] photoinduced cycloaddition in the D.-A. adducts of chromone derivatives, and (ii) to ascertain whether secondary D.-A. addition and the subsequent one-pot photoprotolytic oxametathesis is possible in the strained polycycles derived from such photocyclized D.-A. adducts of chromones.
The D.-A. adducts of substituted chromones and cyclic dienes undergo clean and quantitative photocyclization into dienes 2 upon irradiation in a Rayonet photoreactor with RPR-3500 lamps (a broadband UV source with λ = 350 ± 50 nm). To the best of our knowledge this is the first example for a tandem D.-A. reaction followed by an aryl-alkene [2π+2π] photocyclization involving an aromatic ketone other than a 1,4-naphthoquinone.
The 3-cyano-group certainly makes the chromone a much more reactive dienophile. While the unsubstituted chromone is not reactive at all, we found that its [formal] D.-A. adducts with cyclic dienes can nevertheless be obtained in moderate to good yields of 55–70% via the reactions of a better dienophile, chromone-3-carboxylic acid, because the immediate products of this cycloaddition, β-keto acids, undergo facile thermal decarboxylation into 1b,c.
Dienes 2 readily react with dienophiles such as vinyl phenyl ketone, generated in situ, or dibenzoyl ethylene to furnish D.-A. adducts 3. The facial selectivity of this second Diels-Alder step is the same as 1,4-naphthoquinone adducts, i.e. the dienophile is approaching from the “ketone” face. The regiochemistry of vinyl phenyl ketone addition was as shown in Scheme 2, i.e. the position of endo-benzoyl group is proximal to the keto group of the chromone moiety.
Scheme 2.
A striking observation was that the chromone-based polycyclic dienes 2 undergo D.-A. cyclodimerization yielding a single diastereomeric product 4 (Scheme 3).
Scheme 3.
D.-A. dimerization of 2; bottom: ORTEP drawing of the XRay structure of 4c
To better understand this ability of dienes 2 to dimerize diastereoselectively we employed a Density Functional Theory study. Our calculations show that both the chromone and 1,4-naphtoquinone-derived cyclodienes have similar HOMO and LUMO molecular orbitals, with HOMO dominated by the one-node butadiene MO and LUMO – by the two-node butadiene MO. The only significant difference is due to HOMO’s delocalization on the carbonyl’s oxygen, while very little of such interaction is involved with the ether oxygen, Figure 1. The calculated HOMO-LUMO gaps are also very similar, 4.68 eV for 2c and 4.46 eV for B.
Figure 1.

HOMOs of the diene B, derived from 1,4-napthoquinone (left), and of 2b (right), viewed from the carbonyl face; B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p)
It appears that the diastereoselectivity of dimerization is correlated with the relative stability of the D.-A. product. We have optimized the geometries of 16 possible anti dimers of 2b at a b3lyp/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory (the syn dimers were not considered, as the steric clash of the two polycyclic pendants in the syn structures is too severe). To assess the quality of computational predictions we also have computed the structure of 4a at the same level of DFT theory and superimposed it onto its experimental X-Ray geometry. This gave an excellent RMSD of 0.046 for all heavy atoms, indicating that the b3lyp/6-311+G(d,p) is an adequate theory level for this large molecular system.
Table 1 lists computational results in four groups arranged by facial selectivity and sorted by the (global) relative energy, kcal/mol. As follows from Table 1, the observed dimer indeed has the lowest relative energy.
Table 1.
Group 1
|
Group 2
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1/Y1 | X2/Y2 | Ea | X1/Y1 | X2/Y2 | Ea |
| O/CO | O/CO | 0 | CO/O | CO/O | 1.8 |
| CO/O | O/CO | 0.3 | O/CO | CO/O | 1.8 |
| O/CO | CO/O | 2.6 | CO/O | O/CO | 2.0 |
| CO/O | CO/O | 3.1 | O/CO | O/CO | 2.2 |
Group 3
|
Group 4
|
||||
| X1/Y1 | X2/Y2 | Ea | X1/Y1 | X2/Y2 | Ea |
| O/CO | O/CO | 6.2 | O/CO | CO/O | 8.2 |
| CO/O | O/CO | 6.3 | O/CO | O/CO | 8.8 |
| O/CO | CO/O | 9.3 | CO/O | CO/O | 10.0 |
| CO/O | CO/O | 10 | CO/O | O/CO | 10.4 |
relative energy, kcal/mol
It appears that the most favorable regiochemistry for Group 1 and Group 3 is achieved when X2 is oxygen and Y2 is carbonyl. When X2 is a carbonyl group, the steric destabilization can be attributed to the congestion created by this carbonyl’s proximity to the double bond in the bicyclo[2.2.2] moiety. The positions of the X1 and Y1 groups (i.e. the –C(O)– and –O– groups in the “diene component”) is predicted to have a lesser effect on the regiochemical outcome of the cyclodimerization.
The detrimental effect of the carbonyl group in the position X2 can partially account for the reluctance of the 1,4-naphthoquinone-based caged dienes B to dimerize. Experimentally we did not observe any evidence for the dimerization of B. More revealing and relevant to this failure of B to dimerize is the comparative electronic population analysis in B and 2a. Figure 2 shows that atoms in the butadiene moiety of B are depleted of electronic density to a much greater extent – the cumulative positive charge of the moiety is 1.16 vs 0.405 in 2a – i.e. almost a three-fold difference. The electronic density in the chromone-derived 2a is much less depleted and it is also appropriately polarized with the “dienophile” double bond being more electrophilic, Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Calculated charges in the butadiene moiety of B and 2a (with hydrogen charges summed into heavy atoms) B3LYP/6-311+G(2d,2p)
Conceivably, this polarization and lack of symmetry in 2a ensures that non-symmetric dienophiles, such as vinyl phenyl ketone, undergoes a D.-A. addition to 2a in a highly regio- and stereo-selective fashion, yielding an endo-benzoyl bicyclo[2.2.2] structure 3a with synregiochemistry of carbonyl groups, Scheme 4. One notes that the regio and stereochemistry of 3a is thus pre-defined at the first D.-A. step chromone → 1a.
Scheme 4.
Photoprotolytic oxametathesis sequence. ORTEP drawings of the respective XRay structures are shown at right.
Endo-benzoyl polycycle 3a was then introduced into our photoprotolytic sequence. First, the Paternò-Büchi reaction, photoinduced with broadband 300–400nm irradiation in benzene, yielded 85% of oxetane 5a. The oxetane, when treated with HCl-dioxane in DCM, undergoes cycloreversion to an alternative alkene-carbonyl pair, which amounts to alkene-carbonyl (oxa)metathesis. Secondary electrophilic attack of H+ on the newly formed styrene moiety followed by nucleophilic participation of the transient enol results in formation of cyclopropyl ring, as shown in Scheme 5.10
Scheme 5.
A plausible mechanism of the acid-catalyzed ring opening-ring closure step.
It is worth noting that the regio- and stereochemical outcome of the overall synthetic sequence chromone → 6 is not decided at the photoprotolytic oxametathesis step, as the configuration inherited in 3 is simply passed on to the rearranged 6. Given that the stereochemistry of 3 itself is effectively defined at the first D.-A. step (yielding 1), this observation is significant, as there exists a number of approaches to control the stereochemistry of the first D.-A. step. The endo/exo ratio for the cyanochromone cycloaddition is very high (>95:5), according to Hsung7 and our own observations. One expects that high enantioselectivity in the formation of 1 can also be achieved, as a number of suitable chiral auxiliaries, such as Corey’s oxazaborolidines etc.,11 have been optimized for this task. The significance of this is hard to overestimate as the overall sequence chromone → 6a produces a decorated polycycle possessing twelve stereogenic centers, five of which are quaternary.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the Diels-Alder adducts of chromones are capable of photoinduced alkene-arene [2+2] cycloaddition furnishing a versatile diene, which can dimerize or can be introduced into a double-tandem [4π+2π]◦[2π+2π]◦[4π+2π]◦[2π+2π] synthetic sequence, followed by an acid-catalyzed ring opening-ring closure, leading to expeditious growth of molecular complexity over a few experimentally simple steps. The appealing feature of this approach is that the first D.-A. step controls the stereochemical outcome of the entire sequence.
Acknowledgments
Support of this research by the NIH, GM093930, is gratefully acknowledged.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.This paper is dedicated to Professor Nikolai S. Zefirov on the occasion of his 75th birthday.
- 2.Filipescu N, Menter JM. J Chem Soc B. 1969:616–620. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kushner AS. Photoisomerization of the 1,4-naphthoquinone-cyclopentadiene adduct. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971;35:3275–3278. [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Marchand AP, Zope UR, Burritt A, Bott SG, Coxon JM. Tetrahedron. 1995;51:9319–9326. [Google Scholar]; (b) Coxon JM, Fong ST, Lundie K, McDonald DQ, Steel PJ, Marchand AP, Zaragoza F, Zope UR, Rajagopal D, et al. Tetrahedron. 1994;50:13037–13048. [Google Scholar]; (c) Coxon JM, Maclagan RGAR, McDonald DQ, Steel PJ. J Org Chem. 1991;56:2542–2549. [Google Scholar]; (d) Coxon JM, O’Connell MJ, Steel PJ. J Org Chem. 1987;52:4726–4732. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marchand AP, Chong HS, Shukla R, Sharma GVM, Kumar KA, Zope UR, Bott SG. Tetrahedron. 1996;52:13531–13538. [Google Scholar]
- 6.(a) Wollenweber M, Etzkorn M, Reinbold J, Wahl F, Voss T, Melder JP, Grund C, Pinkos R, Hunkler D, Keller M, Worth J, Knothe L, Prinzbach H. Eur J Org Chem. 2000;23:3855–3886. [Google Scholar]; (b) Fessner WD, Scheumann K, Prinzbach H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991;32:5939–5942. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hsung RP. J Org Chem. 1997;62:7904–7905. doi: 10.1021/jo971479p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Valiulin RA, Kutateladze AG. Org Lett. 2009;11:3886–3889. doi: 10.1021/ol901456m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jones G, Schwartz SB, Marton MT. Chem Commun. 1973;11:374–375. [Google Scholar]; (b) Jones G, Acquadro MA, Carmody MA. Chem Commun. 1975;6:206–207. [Google Scholar]
- 10.General Experimental Procedures:Alkene-arene [2+2] photo cycloaddition. Approximately 10 mM solution of an endo-precursor 1 in benzene was irradiated in a Pyrex vessel in the Rayonet reactor equipped with RPR-3500 UV lamps (broadband 300–400 nm UV source with peak emission at 350 nm) for 24–48 hours. Irradiation resulted in a quantitative conversion to 2, which can be further purified by chromatography or used without purification.Diene 2a: from 2.23 g of 1a (8.9 mmol) in 1.0 L of benzene, irradiation for 24 hrs (hexane/EtOAc gradient 15:1→5:1): 1.23 g (55 %). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.00 (dd, J = 9.6, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.95 (ddd, J = 9.8, 5.8, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 5.54 (d, J = 9.6 Hz, 1H), 5.45 (d, J = 9.8 Hz, 1H), 4.75 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (ddd, J = 8.0, 5.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 2.86 (dd, J = 8.3, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.30 (m, 1H), 2.24 (m, 1H), 2.00–1.91 (m, 3H), 1.60–1.54 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 199.51, 126.26, 125.70, 121.68, 120.50, 117.25, 84.04, 81.97, 56.43, 53.31, 50.74, 43.04, 36.47, 36.03, 15.82, 14.19.Diels-Alder adducts 3. A solution of 2 (1.0 eq) and 3-chloropropiophenone (1.3 eq) in 10 mL of pyridine was heated in a screw-cap pressure flask at 130–140°C overnight, cooled to room temperature, and the solvent was removed on a high vacuum pump. The crude reaction mixture was purified on a silica gel flash column.D.-A. adduct 3a: from 1.13 g of 2a (4.5 mmol) and 1.00 g of 3-chloropropiophenone (5.9 mmol) at 140°C (hexane/EtOAc gradient 20:1→1:1): 0.86 g (50 %). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06 (m, 2H), 7.54 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (m, 2H), 6.39 (ddd, J = 8.3, 7.2, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (dd, J = 8.3, 6.3 Hz, 1H), 4.80 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.43 (ddd, J = 9.6, 4.8, 2.1 Hz, 1H), 3.13 (ddd, J = 6.4, 1.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.83 (m, 1H), 2.68 (ddd, J = 7.4, 5.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.3 (m, 1H), 2.16 (m, 1H), 2.11 (dd, J = 7.6, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.04–1.94 (m, 1H), 1.93–1.85 (m, 4H), 1.54–1.46 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 203.20, 200.49, 147.47, 136.13, 133.39, 133.21, 131.37, 128.99, 128.94, 117.32, 91.34, 83.36, 57.80, 52.61, 40.17, 36.57, 35.43, 35.09, 33.84, 33.77, 21.93, 16.18, 14.28. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C25H21NNaO3+ (MNa+) 406.1414, found 406.1425.Paternò Büchi adducts 5. 1–3 mM solution of 3 in benzene was irradiated as described above for 48–72 hours. Irradiation resulted in a quantitative conversion to 5, which were used without further purification, as the oxetanes are not stable on silica gel.Oxetane 5a: from 1.50 g of 3a (3.9 mmol) in 1.5 L of benzene, irradiation for 72 hrs: (> 85%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38–7.36 (m, 4H), overlaps 7.36–7.32 (m, 1H), 4.80 (m, 1H), 4.72 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (dddd, J = 5.5, 3.5, 1.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 2.95–2.91 (m, 2H), 2.74 (ddd, J = 6.5, 1.8, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.54 (dd, J = 7.6, 5.2 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (m, 1H), 2.26 (m, 1H), 2.12 (ddd, J = 6.2, 6.2, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 2.01–1.90 (m, 4H), 1.81 (ddd, J = 13.2, 6.7, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 1.63–1.56 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 202.03, 136.31, 129.11, 128.75, 127.15, 117.46, 101.10, 90.43, 81.47, 81.37, 56.84, 54.57, 53.16, 44.23, 39.63, 38.59, 37.05, 36.12, 35.43, 32.27, 31.92, 15.92, 14.11. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C25H22NO3+ (MH+) 384.1594, found 384.1586.HCl-catalyzed cycloreversion to aldehydes 6. A 10-fold excess of HCl (4.0 M solution in dioxane) was added to a solution of oxetane 5 in dichloromethane (DCM) and stirred overnight at room temperature, washed twice with 5% aqueous NaOH, and water. The crude aldehyde 6 was purified by column chromatography.Aldehyde 6a: from 200 mg (0.52 mmol) of 5a and 2.61 mL of HCl (4.0 M, 10.43 mmol) in DCM (hexane/EtOH 10:1, then DCM/MeOH 2:1): 278 mg (71 %). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 8.41 (s, 1H), 7.38–7.30 (m, 5H), 4.74 (d, J = 4.1 Hz, 1H), 3.16 (ddd, J = 7.8, 5.9, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 2.89 (d, J = 2.9 Hz, 1H), 2.82 (m, 1H), 2.69 (dd, J = 7.9, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.52 (m, 1H), 2.27–2.18 (m, 5H), 2.11–2.04 (m, 1H), 2.02–1.96 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.65 (m, 1H). 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ = 200.43, 198.84, 137.60, 129.27, 128.99, 128.01, 117.41, 89.39, 82.69, 54.40, 52.37, 42.46, 40.09, 39.91, 37.74, 35.82, 35.73, 35.59, 34.57, 29.40, 28.18, 15.86, 14.31. HRMS (ESI) calcd for C25H22NO3+ (MH+) 384.1594, found 384.1592.
- 11.(a) Corey EJ. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2009;48:2100–2117. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Reetz MT, Jiao N. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2006;45:2416–2419. doi: 10.1002/anie.200504561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Roelfes G, Feringa BL. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:3230–3232. doi: 10.1002/anie.200500298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Boersma AJ, Feringa BL, Roelfes G. Org Lett. 2007;9:3647–3650. doi: 10.1021/ol7015274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Barroso S, Blay G, Pedro JR. Org Lett. 2007;9:1983–1986. doi: 10.1021/ol0705752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






