Skip to main content
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology logoLink to Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
. 2010 Jun 30;3(2):110–114. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2010.3.2.110

Evaluation and Management of Antrochoanal Polyps

Huseyin Yaman 1,, Suleyman Yilmaz 1, Elif Karali 1, Ender Guclu 1, Ozcan Ozturk 1
PMCID: PMC2896733  PMID: 20607082

Abstract

Antrochoanal polyps (ACPs) are benign polypoid lesions arising from the maxillary antrum and they extend into the choana. They occur more commonly in children and young adults, and they are almost always unilateral. The etiopathogenesis of ACPs is not clear. Nasal obstruction and nasal drainage are the most common presenting symptoms. The differential diagnosis should include the causes of unilateral nasal obstruction. Nasal endoscopy and computed tomography scans are the main diagnostic techniques, and the treatment of ACPs is always surgical. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and powered instrumentation during FESS for complete removal of ACPs are extremely safe and effective procedures. Physicians should focus on detecting the exact origin and extent of the polyp to prevent recurrence.

Keywords: Antrochoanal polyp, Diagnosis, Nasal obstruction, Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Antrochoanal polyps (ACPs) are benign polypoid lesions arising from the maxillary antrum and they extend into the choana. ACPs usually have two components and these are the cystic and solid polypoid parts (1-4). ACPs are almost always unilateral, although bilateral ACPs have been reported in literature (5, 6). They most commonly occur in children and young adults. The most common presenting symptoms are nasal obstruction and nasal drainage. Nasal endoscopy and computed tomography (CT) scans are required for making the diagnosis and the treatment planning. The differential diagnosis should include different causes of unilateral nasal obstruction and ipsilateral nasal masses (1-3). ACPs are treated with surgery.

The purpose of this study was to review the epidemiology, etiopathogenesis, clinical features, the preoperative evaluation, pathology, differential diagnosis, treatment and complications of ACPs.

TERMINOLOGY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY

ACP or Killian polyp arises from the inflamed and edematous mucosa of the maxillary antrum and they consist of two components; the antral one is almost always cystic and the other is solid. ACP passes through the maxillary ostium into the middle meatus, with extension into the nasopharynx or oropharynx. The cystic component mostly originates from the posterior, inferior, lateral or medial walls of the maxillary antrum, and it attaches to the solid polyp with a pedicle in the nasal cavity (1-4, 7-9). Lee and Huang (2) found that the most common site of origin was the posterior wall (92%).

ACPs usually originate from the nasal septum, sphenoid sinus, ethmoid sinus, hard and soft palates and nasal turbinates (10-14). ACPs are mostly seen unilaterally, but rare cases of bilateral ACPs have been reported in the literature (5, 6).

It was reported that ACPs constitute approximately 4-6% of all nasal polyps in the general population (1, 3, 8, 15), yet Cook et al. (4) found a higher incidence of ACPs (10.4%). This rate increases to 33% in children (1, 15, 16), and ACPs occur more commonly in children and young adults (1, 3, 8), but it may manifest at any age (4, 8, 17, 18). In a previous study, approximately 70% of patients were between 30 and 70 yr old (4). ACPs are more common in males than females (1, 4, 8, 18, 19). Cook et al. (4) observed that the incidence of ACPs was 70% in males and 30% in females.

ETIOPATHOGENESIS

The etiopathogenesis of ACPs has not been clarified (1-4, 9). Chronic sinusitis and allergy have been implicated (1-4, 8, 9). Lee and Huang (2) determined that 65% of the patients with ACP had chronic sinusitis. ACPs, which could develop from an expanding intramural cyst in the maxillary sinus, may result in maxillary sinusitis and ostiomeatal complex disease when the polyp expands to impede the maxillary sinus ostium or hinder the mucociliary function of the sinus mucosa. Chronic maxillary sinusitis, instead of being the cause of ACPs, could be the result of an obstruction of the maxillary sinus ostium by ACPs (2, 20). Some authors have found a statistically significant association of ACP with allergic diseases (4, 15). Cook et al. (4) reported allergic rhinitis in approximately 70% of their patients with ACP. Similarly, Chen et al. (15) detected that allergic disease plays a significant role in ACP. On the other hand, other authors have found no association of ACP with allergy (7, 21).

Sunagawa et al. (22) demonstrated the possible role of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and inhibitor in the pathogenesis of ACPs in their study. The role of arachidonic acid metabolites in the pathogenesis of ACP was shown by Jang et al. (23).

CLINICAL FEATURES AND PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION

Taking a careful history, a complete physical examination, nasal endoscopy and radiological examinations are necessary for diagnosing and planning treatment of ACPs. The presenting symptoms are similar to many of the nasal disorders, and these include nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, snoring, headache, mouth breathing, epistaxis, anosmia, halitosis, dyspnea, dysphagia, dysphonia and nasal pruritis (1, 3, 12, 24). Nasal obstruction and nasal drainage are the most common presenting symptoms. Orvidas et al. (25) noted nasal obstruction (100%), rhinorrhoea (48%), snoring (36%) and mouth breathing (32%) in their patients with ACP. Also, obstructive sleep apnoea and cachexia due to ACP have been reported in the literature (26, 27).

Anterior rhinoscopy usually reveals an intranasal polypoidal mass (18). A larger polyp may extend into the nasopharynx and the polyp may be seen by posterior rhinoscopy or in the mouth (8) (Fig. 1). Nasal endoscopy and CT are the main diagnostic techniques. ACPs typically appear as a smooth, bluish or yellowish mass on nasal endoscopy (18) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Appearance of an antrochoanal polyp behind the uvula and the soft palate.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Nasal endoscopic view of an antrochoanal polyp.

On CT scans, ACPs are seen as soft tissue masses that occupy the maxillary antrum and extend through the natural or accessory maxillary ostium into the nasal cavity between the middle turbinate and the lateral nasal wall (Fig. 3), without bone erosion or expansion, and they may extend posteriorly toward the choana (2, 28) (Fig. 4).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Coronal computed tomography image of an antrochoanal polyp on the right side

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Coronal CT image of an antrochoanal polyp extending to both choana.

ACPs appear as hypointense on T1 images and with enhanced T2 signals on magnetic resonance imaging. The cystic part of ACPs is enhanced in the peripheral area when intravenous gadolinium is administered (18, 29).

HISTOPATHOLOGIC EXAMINATION

The histopathological characteristics of ACPs are similar to those of non-allergic polyps of the maxillary sinus (7, 30). ACPs are lined with pseudostratified ciliated epithelium, and their stromal connective tissue contains a variable infiltration of infiammatory cells (30). The stroma is usually edematous and highly vascular, and it is composed of loose connective tissue that is mainly infiltrated with plasma cells and a few eosinophils. The inflammatory cell infiltration was more severe and the eosinophilic infiltration was less severe in ACPs when compared with that of allergic nasal polyps (7, 9). There are significantly less submucosal glands in the ACPs compared to that of nasal polyps (9, 21). Aktas et al. (21) reported that the surface epitelial cells of ACP patients have few or no cilia, and the stroma contains a minimal number of mucous glands with eosinophils. Skladzien et al. (30) reported that scanning electron microscopic examination of ACPs reveals squamous cell metaplasia less frequently than inflammatory polyps, and ACPs are mostly covered with normal ciliated respiratory epithelium. They also reported that there were minor differences in the composition of the cellular infiltration on light microscopic examination.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

The differential diagnosis of ACPs should include juvenile angiofibroma, nasal glioma, meningoencephalocele, inverted papilloma, mucocele, mucus retention cyst, Tornwalt's cyst, grossly enlarged adenoids, lymphoma and nasopharyngeal malignancies (1-3, 8, 28, 31).

Mucus retention cyst occurs following obstruction of the mucus-secreting glands within sinuses, and particularly in the maxillary sinus antrum. It is a mucus-filled epithelial cyst arising from the walls of the sinus cavity, and it does not extend into the choana (31). A crescent-shape air rim above the cyst usually allows making the differential diagnosis (28).

Mucocele contains mucus and desquamated epithelium and mucoceles can fill sinus cavities. It usually occurs in the frontoethmoid region. Mucoceles rarely appear in the maxillary sinuses and they do not extend through the choana. When the mucocele causes enlargement of the cavity, it causes erosion or sclerosis of the walls of the cavity. If a mucocele is infected, then it becomes a mucopyocele (28, 31).

Angiofibroma is a vascular, benign neoplasm that has the potential for local destruction, and this may arise from the nasal pterygoid plate. It affects male adolescents. The symptoms may be epistaxis, nasal obstruction or a mass in the nasopharynx. Carotid angiography and CT scanning may be used for making the differential diagnosis from other lesions (18, 31). It has a homogeneous density and it enhances strongly following administration of intravenous contrast.

Hemangioma is a rare benign vascular lesion in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Most of them arise from the anterior nasal septum and the nasal turbinates (28).

Malignant tumors of the nasopharynx may cause difficulty when making the differential diagnosis. Malignant tumors of the nasopharynx account for about 1% of all malignancies (31). These tumors cause airway obstruction, destruction of bony structures and invasion into the paranasal sinuses. CT scanning can be useful to evaluate the location and size of the lesion and the extent of the neoplastic involvement. The most common malignant tumors are lymphoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, lymphoepithelioma, esthesioneuroblastoma and chordoma (31). Esthesioneuroblastoma arises from the olfactory mucosa and it is classically located in the roof of the nasal cavity (28).

TREATMENT AND COMPLICATIONS

The treatment of ACP is always surgical. Simple polypectomy and a Caldwell Luc procedure were the previously preferred methods for surgically treating ACPs. In recent yr, functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) became the more preferred surgical technique. Simple polypectomy carries a high recurrence rate (2, 4, 19, 32). The antral part of the polyp should be removed to avoid post-operative recurrence. There is controversy concerning the route of removal of the antral part. The Caldwell-Luc procedure offers good exposure for complete removal of the antral part of the polyp (15). But this procedure may have possible complications, including cheek anaesthesia, cheek swelling and injury of the infraorbital nerve, and it carries the risk of damaging the growing teeth and the growth centers of the maxilla in children (1, 3, 18, 32).

FESS has recently been shown to be a safe and effective method for treating ACPs, and it consists of resection of the nasal part of the polyp and the cystic antral part with attachment to the maxillary wall via the middle meatus (18, 19, 32-35) (Fig. 5). The lower part of the uncinate process is removed and then the maxillary ostium is widened. Cook et al. (4) observed no recurrences for 33 patients with ACPs after FESS. Ozer et al. (33) performed FESS, combined FESS and transcanin sinoscopy or the Caldwell Luc approach for the treatment of ACPs. They found recurrence in 3 patients after FESS, yet they found no recurrence after combined FESS and transcanin sinoscopy or the Caldwell Luc approach. Atighechi et al. (34) used a mini-Caldwell approach with FESS in their patients. They reported the technique showed minimal recurrence and a low complication rate, and so the technique is useful to completely remove ACPs. Hong et al. (36) recommended powered instrumentation during FESS as an effective technique for removing ACPs and the antral portion. They found an improvement rate of 96.4% and no significant complications when powered instrumentation was used. El-Guindy and Mansour (35) used combined endoscopic middle meatal surgery and transcanine sinoscopy to remove the residual tissue of ACPs in the antrum. Lee and Huang (2) used the transnasal endoscopic approach for ACPs originating from the inferior and posterior walls of the maxillary sinus and they used the combined endoscopic and transcanine approach for ACPs originating from the lateral walls of the maxillary sinus and for the recurrent patients. They reported the success rate of the transnasal endoscopic approach and the combined endoscopic and transcanine approach as 76.9% and 100%, respectively.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Gross appearance of an antrochoanal polyp.

CONCLUSION

ACPs are benign polypoid lesions arising from the maxillary antrum and they extend into the choana. The most common presenting symptoms are nasal obstruction and nasal drainage. ACPs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of unilateral nasal obstruction and a nasal mass. ACPs can be diagnosed by taking a careful history and conducting clinical exams and nasal endoscopic and radiological examinations. FESS for complete removal of ACPs is an extremely safe and effective procedure. Physicians should focus on detecting the exact origin and extent of the polyp to prevent recurrence. Powered instrumentation during FESS is an effective technique for removing ACPs and the antral portion.

Footnotes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

  • 1.Basak S, Karaman CZ, Akdilli A, Metin KK. Surgical approaches to antrochoanal polyps in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998 Dec 15;46(3):197–205. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(98)00160-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lee TJ, Huang SF. Endoscopic sinus surgery for antrochoanal polyps in children. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Nov;135(5):688–692. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.02.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ozdek A, Samim E, Bayiz U, Meral I, Safak MA, Oguz H. Antrochoanal polyps in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2002 Sep 24;65(3):213–218. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(02)00153-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cook PR, Davis WE, McDonald R, McKinsey JP. Antrochoanal polyposis: a review of 33 cases. Ear Nose Throat J. 1993 Jun;72(6):401–402. 404–410. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Basu SK, Bandyopadhyay SN, Bora H. Bilateral antrochoanal polyps. J Laryngol Otol. 2001 Jul;115(7):561–562. doi: 10.1258/0022215011908225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Myatt HM, Cabrera M. Bilateral antrochonanal polyps in a child: a case report. J Laryngol Otol. 1996 Mar;110(3):272–274. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100133390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Min YG, Chung JW, Shin JS, Chi JG. Histologic structure of antrochoanal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol. 1995 Jul;115(4):543–547. doi: 10.3109/00016489509139364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yuca K, Bayram I, Kiroglu AF, Etlik O, Cankaya H, Sakin F, et al. Evaluation and treatment of antrochoanal polyps. J Otolaryngol. 2006 Dec;35(6):420–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ozcan C, Zeren H, Talas DU, Kucukoglu M, Gorur K. Antrochoanal polyp: a transmission electron and light microscopic study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Jan;262(1):55–60. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0729-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ileri F, Koybasioglu A, Uslu S. Clinical presentation of a sphenochoanal polyp. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1998;255(3):138–139. doi: 10.1007/s004050050030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ozcan C, Duce MN, Gorur K. Choanal polyp originating from the middle turbinate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Apr;261(4):184–186. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0617-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Aydil U, Karadeniz H, Sahin C. Choanal polyp originated from the inferior nasal concha. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Apr;265(4):477–479. doi: 10.1007/s00405-007-0461-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ozgirgin ON, Kutluay L, Akkuzu G, Gungen Y. Choanal polyp originating from the nasal septum: a case report. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003 Jul–Aug;24(4):261–264. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(03)00048-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tosun F, Yetiser S, Akcam T, Ozkaptan Y. Sphenochoanal polyp: endoscopic surgery. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001 Apr 06;58(1):87–90. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00468-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen JM, Schloss MD, Azouz ME. Antro-choanal polyp: a 10-year retrospective study in the pediatric population with a review of the literature. J Otolaryngol. 1989 Jun;18(4):168–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Woolley AL, Clary RA, Lusk RP. Antrochoanal polyps in children. Am J Otolaryngol. 1996 Nov–Dec;17(6):368–373. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0709(96)90068-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Franche GL, Granzotto EH, de Borba AT, Hermes F, Saleh Cde S, de Souza PA. Endoscopic polipectomy with middle meatal antrostomy for antrochoanal polyp treatment. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep–Oct;73(5):689–692. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30131-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Frosini P, Picarella G, De Campora E. Antrochoanal polyp: analysis of 200 cases. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009 Feb;29(1):21–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bozzo C, Garrel R, Meloni F, Stomeo F, Crampette L. Endoscopic treatment of antrochoanal polyps. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Feb;264(2):145–150. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0175-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Berg O, Carenfelt C, Silfversward C, Sobin A. Origin of the choanal polyp. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988 Nov;114(11):1270–1271. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1988.01860230064025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Aktas D, Yetiser S, Gerek M, Kurnaz A, Can C, Kahramanyol M. Antrochoanal polyps: analysis of 16 cases. Rhinology. 1998 Jun;36(2):81–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sunagawa M, Kinjoh K, Nakamura M, Kosugi T. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor antigen in tissue extracts of paranasal sinus mucous membranes affected by chronic sinusitis and antrochoanal polyps. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1999;256(5):237–241. doi: 10.1007/s004050050149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jang YJ, Rhee CK, Oh CH, Ryoo HG, Kim HG, Ha M. Arachidonic acid metabolites in antrochoanal polyp and nasal polyp associated with chronic paranasal sinusitis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000 Jun;120(4):531–534. doi: 10.1080/000164800750046054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sharma HS, Daud AR. Antrochoanal polyp: a rare paediatric emergency. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1997 Jul 18;41(1):65–70. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(97)00064-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Orvidas LJ, Beatty CW, Weaver AL. Antrochoanal polyps in children. Am J Rhinol. 2001 Sep–Oct;15(5):321–325. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Salib RJ, Sadek SA, Dutt SN, Pearman K. Antrochoanal polyp presenting with obstructive sleep apnoea and cachexia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000 Aug 31;54(2-3):163–166. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00353-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rodgers GK, Chan KH, Dahl RE. Antral choanal polyp presenting as obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991 Aug;117(8):914–916. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1991.01870200108019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pruna X, Ibanez JM, Serres X, Garriga V, Barber I, Vera J. Antrochoanal polyps in children: CT findings and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol. 2000;10(5):849–851. doi: 10.1007/s003300051017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.De Vuysere S, Hermans R, Marchal G. Sinochoanal polyp and its variant, the angiomatous polyp: MRI findings. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(1):55–58. doi: 10.1007/s003300000565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Skladzien J, Litwin JA, Nowogrodzka-Zagorska M, Wierzchowski W. Morphological and clinical characteristics of antrochoanal polyps: comparison with chronic inflammation-associated polyps of the maxillary sinus. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2001 Apr;28(2):137–141. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(00)00108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Towbin R, Dunbar JS, Bove K. Antrochoanal polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979 Jan;132(1):27–31. doi: 10.2214/ajr.132.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sato K, Nakashima T. Endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic sinusitis with antrochoanal polyp. Laryngoscope. 2000 Sep;110(9):1581–1583. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200009000-00036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ozer F, Ozer C, Cagici CA, Canbolat T, Yilmazer C, Akkuzu B. Surgical approaches for antrochoanal polyp: a comparative analysis. B-ENT. 2008;4(2):93–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Atighechi S, Baradaranfar MH, Karimi G, Jafari R. Antrochoanal polyp: a comparative study of endoscopic endonasal surgery alone and endoscopic endonasal plus mini-Caldwell technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Aug;266(8):1245–1248. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0890-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.El-Guindy A, Mansour MH. The role of transcanine surgery in antrochoanal polyps. J Laryngol Otol. 1994 Dec;108(12):1055–1057. doi: 10.1017/s0022215100128877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hong SK, Min YG, Kim CN, Byun SW. Endoscopic removal of the antral portion of antrochoanal polyp by powered instrumentation. Laryngoscope. 2001 Oct;111(10):1774–1778. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

RESOURCES