Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Med Virol. 2009 Aug;81(8):1380–1384. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21539

Adenovirus Type 3 Outbreak in Connecticut Associated with A Novel Variant

Marie L Landry 1, Mark G Lebeck 2, Ana W Capuano 2, Troy McCarthy 2, Gregory C Gray 2
PMCID: PMC2897138  NIHMSID: NIHMS206780  PMID: 19551823

Abstract

An adenovirus outbreak occurred in New Haven, Connecticut in 2006-2007. Molecular typing revealed a 2-fold increase in adenovirus type 3 infections. Restriction enzyme analysis indicated that the CT outbreak was largely due to a marked increase in the novel Ad3a51 strain. This outbreak represents the first detection of Ad3a51 in the United States. While most infections were mild, children under 3 were at increased risk for severe disease and one patient with underlying disease died.

Keywords: Adenoviridae, Adenovirus, epidemiology, respiratory tract diseases, communicable diseases, infectious diseases, emerging, outbreak


Adenovirus infections are associated with a variety of clinical syndromes, and are usually self-limited. However, severe illness has been reported, especially in military recruits and compromised hosts, but has also been associated with new genomic variants [Kajon et al., 1990; Louie et al., 2008]. In order to investigate the current epidemiology of adenovirus infections in the United States, the University of Iowa Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases (CEID) and 22 US laboratories collaborated in a national surveillance program for emerging adenovirus infections from July 2004 through April of 2007. Laboratories routinely sent adenovirus-positive clinical specimens to the University of Iowa where the specimens were sequence typed using a hexon gene typing strategy[Lu and Erdman, 2006]. The collaboration resulted in the characterization of more than 3000 clinical adenovirus isolates. In November 2006, the Clinical Virology Laboratory at Yale New Haven Hospital (YNHH) in New Haven, Connecticut, experienced a marked increase in the number of clinical specimens that were adenovirus positive. This report summarizes an investigation into this increase.

Methods

Patient samples

Samples were submitted to clinical laboratories for diagnostic testing and were not solicited for the purposes of the study. Specimens positive for adenovirus by direct fluorescent antibody staining (DFA), PCR, other rapid test, or culture were sent to the University of Iowa from 22 participating laboratories, including 14 civilian and 8 military sites, for typing and further analysis. Prior to participation, the study was approved by each institution's Institutional Review Board.

Clinical information

Limited demographic and clinical data was also submitted by each laboratory: collection date, collection site, specimen source, patient birth date, gender, hospitalized when specimen was collected, and if the subject had received a cellular or solid organ transplant during the previous six months. Because of their risk for severe disease, additional information was obtained from adenovirus patients <7 yrs of age or who had received a transplant procedure within six months of their adenovirus detection: race and ethnicity, clinical presentation, hospitalization, intensive care, disposition, cancer, and chronic disease.

After recognition of the CT adenovirus outbreak, supplemental clinical information was obtained on the 218 Ad3 infected YNHH patients regardless of age and transplant status: diagnoses of tonsillitis, otitis media, bronchiolitis, croup, or gastrointestinal symptoms, and history of asthma.

Laboratory analysis

At the University of Iowa's CEID, viral DNA was extracted from submitted specimens or cultures, and analyzed according to published procedures to determine adenovirus type and genotype [Adrian et al., 1989; Arens and Dilworth, 1988; Golovina et al., 1991; Guo et al., 1988; Li and Wadell, 1988; Lu and Erdman, 2006].

Statistical analyses

The χ2 test and Fisher's exact test were used to examine potential risk factor associations. The proportional odds model was used to examine risk factors for severe adenovirus infection. Analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.1 (SAS Institute).

Results

From November 2006 to April 2007, compared to the previous two years, YNHH experienced a nearly 2-fold increase in Ad3 observed among YNHH adenovirus positive specimens (Fig. 1). While the number of other adenovirus types detected was stable over time, the sudden increase in Ad3 specimens explained the overall increase in adenovirus detections. Prior to November 2006, YNHH submitted 214 adenovirus specimens of unique patient/event to the national adenovirus surveillance network and 75 (35.0%) were typed as Ad3 (data not shown). From November 2006 to April 2007, YNHH submitted 183 adenovirus specimens and 143 (78.1%) were typed as Ad3 (data not shown). A total of 193 of the 218 Ad3 identified at the YNHH Clinical Virology Laboratory were analyzed by restriction enzyme (RE) digest patterns and revealed all to be of the 3a genome group. The remaining 25 Ad3 identified were either typed following the April 2007 cutoff or were unable to yield viable precipitated DNA for RE analysis (REA).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Total number of adenovirus-positive clinical specimens (bar), with all adenovirus type 3 (solid line), variant Ad3a50 and variant Ad3a51 positive specimens (dotted lines), Clinical Virology Laboratory, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, July 2004 to April 2007.

In a recent study we reported the identification of two new Ad3 variants Ad3a50 and Ad3a51 (LeBeck MG, Capuano AW, Schnurr DP, Kajon AE, Setterquist SF, Heil GL, et al. Two new genotypes of adenovirus type 3 identified from a US National Surveillance Study, 2004-2007, submitted). The CT outbreak is largely explained by a marked increase in the clinical detections of the novel Ad3a51 strain (Table 1 and Figure 1). To the authors' knowledge, Ad3a51 has never been detected in the United States before the CT outbreak (Table 1).

Table 1. Characteristics of patients infected with adenovirus type 3 in US national surveillance, July 2004 – Apr 2007, from medical record information based upon unique clinical events associated with a positive adenovirus specimen among recent transplant patients or patients younger than 7 years of age.

Variables All US clinical laboratory sites
(n=576)
n (%)
Yale New Haven Hospital, Connecticut

Before outbreak Jul. 2004 - Oct. 2006
(n=60)
n (%)
Outbreak period Nov. 2006 - Apr. 2007
(n=121)
n (%)

Age group
 < 7 years old 562 59 (98.3) 121 (100)
 ≥ 7 years old 14 1 (1.7) 0 (0)
Gender
 male 324 35 (58.3) 71 (58.7)
 female 252 25 (41.7) 50 (41.3)
Immunocompromised
 Cancer 2 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Cancer and transplant 8 1 (1.7) 0 (0)
 Nothing reported 545 59 (98.3) 121 (100)
 Transplant 21 0 (0) 0 (0)
Cancer types
 None reported 566 59 (98.3) 121 (100)
 Bone, connective tissue, skin or breast 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Lymphatic and hematopoietic tissue 8 1 (1.7) 0 (0)
 Respiratory or intrathoracic organs 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
Transplant type types
 None reported 561 59 (98.3) 121 (100)
 Bone marrow 12 1 (1.7) 0 (0)
 Kidney 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Liver 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Lung 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
Upper respiratory tract infection
 Not reported 279 8 (13.3) 8 (6.6)
 Yes 297 52 (86.7) 113 (93.4)
Pneumonia
 Not reported 520 54 (90) 111 (91.7)
 Yes 56 6 (10) 10 (8.3)
Conjunctivitis
 Not reported 496 54 (90) 95 (78.5)
 Yes 80 6 (10) 26 (21.5)
Encephalitis
 Not reported 572 60 (100) 119 (98.4)
 Yes 4 0 (0) 2 (1.7)
Days in the hospital
 Missing 22 0 (0) 0 (0)
 No, unknown 304 46 (76.7) 104 (86)
 Yes, 0 - 3 days 144 8 (13.3) 10 (8.3)
 Yes, 4 - 506 days 104 6 (10) 7 (5.8)
 Yes, number of days unknown 2 0 (0) 0 (0)
Intensive care unit days
 Missing 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
 No, unknown 545 58 (96.7) 118 (97.5)
 Yes, 1 - 11 days 16 1 (1.7) 2 (1.7)
 Yes, 12 - 763 days 11 1 (1.7) 1 (0.8)
 Yes, number of days unknown 3 0 (0) 0 (0)
Death associated
 Missing 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
 No/unknown 572 60 (100) 120 (99.2)
 Yes, other cause or unknown 2 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Yes, primarily due to adenovirus 1 0 (0) 1 (0.8)
Chronic disease
 Missing 1 0 (0) 0 (0)
 No 452 57 (95) 113 (93.4)
 Yes 73 3 (5) 8 (6.6)
 Unknown 50 0 (0) 0 (0)
Adenovirus 3 variant type*
 Ad3a2 134 14 (23.3) 11 (9.1)
 Ad3a50 100 21 (35) 25 (20.7)
 Ad3 a51 74 12 (20) 60 (49.6)
 Other Ad 3 59 12 (20) 6 (5)
 Not Typed 209 1 (1.7) 19 (15.7)
*

Statistically significant difference (before outbreak versus outbreak period, excluding “Not Typed”) with Chi-Square.

In general, the outbreak patients were healthy children <7 yrs of age, who suffered from acute respiratory infection but were not hospitalized. No statistically significant differences were identified in any of the variables examined before or during the outbreak (Table 1). Supplemental clinical information subsequently obtained on all YNHH Ad3 infected patients showed directionally higher incidence of wheezing, rash and asthma among patients infected with the newly described variant types, Ad3a50 and Ad3a51 compared to Ad3a2 and other Ad3. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance (data not shown).

Multivariable risk factor modeling (Table 2) for adenovirus 3 disease severity (death or intensive care unit stay vs. hospitalization vs. other disease) revealed that age was an important factor (controlling for chronic diseases). Specifically, children under 2 years of age (OR 5.9; 95% CI 1.9 to 19.0) and from 2 to 3 years of age (OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 12.2) were at increased risk of severe Ad3 clinical disease when compared to subjects above. When modeling for severe adenovirus infection or for pneumonia, no statistically significant risk factor associations were found.

Table 2.

Risk factor for ordinal adenovirus severity (Died/ICU, hospitalized vs. others) using the proportional odds model among Yale New Haven Hospital recent transplant patients or patients younger than 7 years of age infected with REA typed adenovirus type 3, with medical record information and based upon unique clinical events associated with a positive adenovirus specimen.

Variables n Unadjusted OR
(95% CI)
Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age group
 0-1 47 4.1(1.4-11.9) 5.9(1.9-19)
 2-3 41 2.9(0.9-9) 3.7(1.1-12.2)
 ≥4 73 reference reference
Gender
 Male 95 1.2(0.5-2.8) ---
 Female 66 reference ---
Respiratory disease
 Yes 147 0.3(0.1-1) ---
 No/Unknown 14 reference ---
Period
 Outbreak 102 0.7(0.3-1.6) ---
 Before outbreak 59 reference ---
Adenovirus 3 variant type
 Ad 3a2 25 reference ---
 Ad3 a50 46 6.9(0.8-57.2) ---
 Ad3 a51 72 4.3(0.5-35.5) ---
 Others Ad3 18 8.9(0.9-84.6) ---
Conjunctivitis
 Yes 29 0.5(0.1-1.8) ---
 No/Unknown 132 reference ---
Chronic disease
 Yes 10 6.1(1.7-22.1) 10.5(2.5-43)
 No/Unknown 151 reference reference

While most infections were mild, ten of the outbreak patients developed pneumonia and one of the outbreak patients died (patient infected with Ad3a51). The one death reflects the only Ad3-associated death reported from among the 576 Ad3 isolates collected from among the 14 civilian sites during our surveillance. The patient was a child of 3 years and 11 months of age with a congenital oral-facial condition. She was doing well until she developed adenovirus pneumonia in January 2007. She was admitted to the hospital and died one month after admission.

Discussion

Adenovirus type 3 is most commonly recognized as a cause of pharyngoconjunctival fever, sometimes with gastrointestinal symptoms. Outbreaks associated with childrens' camps, swimming pools or lakes, chronic care facilities and hospitals have been reported [Brummitt et al., 1988; Chang et al., 2008; Kajon et al., 1990; Li and Wadell, 1988; Singh-Naz et al., 1993; Zarraga et al., 1992]. Although rare, severe morbidity and deaths due to Ad3 can occur [Barker et al., 2003; Brummitt et al., 1988; Singh-Naz et al., 1993; Zarraga et al., 1992]. Epidemic outbreaks of Ad3 involving several genome types of the same serotype have been documented [Li and Wadell, 1988]. Most recently a community outbreak of Ad3 was reported in Taiwanese children [Chang et al., 2008]. Only 15 of 172 isolates from the outbreak were typed by RFLP and all belonged to genotype Ad3a2.

In the present study, 161 Ad3 positive specimens were genotyped by REA. Our findings are consistent with findings of previous Ad3 outbreak investigations in its demonstration of Ad3 genomic variability [Barker et al., 2003; Brummitt et al., 1988; Foy et al., 1968; Price et al., 2001; Singh-Naz et al., 1993; Zarraga et al., 1992]. In particular, the discovery of two newly described variant types, Ad3a50 and Ad3a51 may explain not only the dramatic rise in incidence of Ad3 infections over such a brief period of time, but also the potential for these new variants to cause marked morbidity among susceptible populations.

This study has a number of limitations. Due to the specialized and tedious nature of whole genome REA, it is rarely performed. Thus there is no central repository of reference material with which to compare our findings, However, we comprehensively studied the literature and are convinced of the uniqueness of the reported novel viral strains. While it is possible that our claim of the newness of the Ad3a51 strain is inaccurate, in another work we examined Ad3 specimens collected in California back to 1963 and found no evidence of this strain [Barker et al., 2003; Foy et al., 1968; Price et al., 2001] (LeBeck MG, Capuano AW, Schnurr DP, Kajon AE, Setterquist SF, Heil GL, et al. Two new genotypes of adenovirus type 3 identified from a US National Surveillance Study, 2004-2007, submitted). The application of this technology has the potential to advance our understanding of outbreaks and severe infections.

In summary, an outbreak of adenovirus disease occurred in New Haven, CT from November 2006 to April 2007. Molecular typing revealed a 2-fold increase in Ad3 infections. Restriction enzyme analysis identified three variant types, including two newly described variants, Ad3a50 and Ad3a51. The CT outbreak was largely explained by a marked increase in the novel Ad3a51 strain. This outbreak represents the first detection of Ad3a51 in the United States. Although most infections were mild, children less than 3 were at greater risk of severe disease.

Acknowledgments

The authors Alicia Cimino and Gerri Russo from the YNHH Clinical Virology Laboratory for their invaluable assistance in the CT outbreak, as well as Margaret Chorazy, Selim Kilic, Erin Moritz, Pradeep Bandaru, and the numerous other University of Iowa graduate students and laboratory interns who have contributed to the molecular study and data management involved in this work. The authors thank Kevin L. Knudtson of the University of Iowa DNA Facility for his much appreciated assistance in sequencing work and the numerous other investigators who have made the national adenovirus surveillance program possible: David P. Schnurr, Kevin L. Russell, Adriana E. Kajon, Diane S. Leland, Gregory A. Storch, Christine C. Ginocchio, Christine C. Robinson, Gail J. Demmler MD, Michael A. Saubolle PhD, Sue C. Kehl, Rangaraj Selvarangan, Melissa B. Miller, James D. Chappell, Danielle Zerr, Deanna L. Kiska, Diane C. Halstead, Sharon F. Setterquist, Jeffrey D. Dawson and Dean D. Erdman.

Financial support:

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Surveillance for Emerging Adenovirus Infections (NIH/NIAID R01 AI053034).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: Gregory C. Gray serves on the data monitoring board for adenovirus vaccine trials sponsored by Duramed.

All other authors: no conflicts.

Marie L. Landry, No conflict

Mark G. Lebeck, No conflict

Ana W. Capuano, No conflict

Troy McCarthy, No conflict

References

  1. Adrian T, Best B, Hierholzer JC, Wigand R. Molecular epidemiology and restriction site mapping of adenovirus type 3 genome types. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(6):1329–1334. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.6.1329-1334.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arens M, Dilworth V. Remarkably homogeneous population of adenovirus type 3 and 7 genome types. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(8):1604–1608. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.8.1604-1608.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker JH, Luby JP, Sean Dalley A, Bartek WM, Burns DK, Erdman DD. Fatal type 3 adenoviral pneumonia in immunocompetent adult identical twins. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(10):e142–146. doi: 10.1086/379127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brummitt CF, Cherrington JM, Katzenstein DA, Juni BA, Van Drunen N, Edelman C, Rhame FS, Jordan MC. Nosocomial adenovirus infections: molecular epidemiology of an outbreak due to adenovirus 3a. J Infect Dis. 1988;158(2):423–432. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.2.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang SY, Lee CN, Lin PH, Huang HH, Chang LY, Ko W, Chang SF, Lee PI, Huang LM, Kao CL. A community-derived outbreak of adenovirus type 3 in children in Taiwan between 2004 and 2005. J Med Virol. 2008;80(1):102–112. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Foy HM, Cooney MK, Hatlen JB. Adenovirus type 3 epidemic associated with intermittent chlorination of a swimming pool. Arch Environ Health. 1968;17(5):795–802. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1968.10665321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Golovina GI, Zolotaryov FN, Yurlova TI. Sensitive analysis of genetic heterogeneity of adenovirus types 3 and 7 in the Soviet Union. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29(10):2313–2321. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2313-2321.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo DF, Shibata R, Shinagawa M, Sato G, Aoki K, Sawada H. Genomic comparison of adenovirus type 3 isolates from patients with acute conjunctivitis in Japan, Australia, and the Philippines. Microbiol Immunol. 1988;32(8):833–842. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1988.tb01444.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kajon AE, Murtagh P, Garcia Franco S, Freire MC, Weissenbacher MC, Zorzopulos J. A new genome type of adenovirus 3 associated with severe lower acute respiratory infection in children. J Med Virol. 1990;30(1):73–76. doi: 10.1002/jmv.1890300116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Li QG, Wadell G. Comparison of 17 genome types of adenovirus type 3 identified among strains recovered from six continents. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26(5):1009–1015. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.5.1009-1015.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Louie JK, Kajon AE, Holodniy M, Guardia-LaBar L, Lee B, Petru AM, Hacker JK, Schnurr DP. Severe pneumonia due to adenovirus serotype 14: a new respiratory threat? Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(3):421–425. doi: 10.1086/525261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lu X, Erdman DD. Molecular typing of human adenoviruses by PCR and sequencing of a partial region of the hexon gene. Arch Virol. 2006;151(8):1587–1602. doi: 10.1007/s00705-005-0722-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Price NO, Hacker JK, Silvers JH, Crawford-Miksza L, Hendry RM, Flood J, Hajjeh RA, Reingold AL, Passaro DJ. Adenovirus type 3 viremia in an adult with toxic shock-like syndrome. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(2):260–262. doi: 10.1086/321831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Singh-Naz N, Brown M, Ganeshananthan M. Nosocomial adenovirus infection: molecular epidemiology of an outbreak. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12(11):922–925. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zarraga AL, Kerns FT, Kitchen LW. Adenovirus pneumonia with severe sequelae in an immunocompetent adult. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15(4):712–713. doi: 10.1093/clind/15.4.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES