Skip to main content
Environmental Health Perspectives logoLink to Environmental Health Perspectives
. 2009 Oct;117(10):A434.

Errata

PMCID: PMC2897215

In the article by La Merrill et al. [Environ Health Perspect 117:1414–1419 (2009)], the keys in Figure 3B and Figure 5C should have been in Figure 3C and Figure 5D, respectively. The corrected figures are provided below.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Diet and maternal TCDD exposure effects on body composition and fasting blood glucose. (A) HFD increased postnatal D2 body weights (mean ± SE; n = 27–31 at PNDs 0–26 for HFD, and n = 28 at PND35 for LFD). (B) HFD (n = 26 mice) increased percent fat at PND35 relative to LFD (mean ± SE; n = 28 mice). (C) Fasting blood glucose was increased by HFD and maternal TCDD-treated (n = 5 litters) compared with HFD and maternal vehicle-treated (n = 6 litters) female progeny at PND36 (mean ± SE). Because diet, but not TCDD, changed body weight and percent body fat, these analyses were done on individual D2 mice, with TCDD- and vehicle-treated D2 mice pooled within diet.

*p < 0.05. #p < 0.0001.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Maternal TCDD exposure and effect of diet on gene expression. Normalized message levels are represented as mean ± SE. (C) Induction of Ahr was increased by HFD relative to LFD (n = 11 and 10 litters, respectively). Measurements were pooled across TCDD and DMBA groups. (D) Induction of Cyp1b1 by DMBA was decreased compared with vehicle in HFD-fed but not in LFD-fed D2 mice. LFD groups are vehicle (n = 5 litters) and DMBA (n = 5 litters); HFD groups are vehicle (n = 6 litters) and DMBA (n = 5 litters).

*p < 0.05.

EHP apologizes for the errors.


Articles from Environmental Health Perspectives are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

RESOURCES