Skip to main content
Journal of Virology logoLink to Journal of Virology
. 2010 May 19;84(15):7917–7921. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00964-10

Feline Lectin Activity Is Critical for the Cellular Entry of Feline Infectious Peritonitis Virus

Andrew D Regan 1, David G Ousterout 1,, Gary R Whittaker 1,*
PMCID: PMC2897608  PMID: 20484511

Abstract

Feline infectious peritonitis is a lethal disease of felids caused by systemic infection with a feline coronavirus. Here, we report identification and analysis of the feline homologue to the human lectin DC-SIGN and show that it is a coreceptor for virulent strains of serotype 1 and serotype 2 feline coronaviruses.


Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a disease of felids that has a spectrum of pathological outcomes, all of which are lethal (18). The causative agent of FIP is a feline coronavirus (FCoV) designated feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV) which infects immune cells, leading to a systemic infection (25, 28). FCoVs are classified as group 1a coronaviruses and circulate as two distinct serotypes (FCoV-1 and FCoV-2) based on the sequences of their S genes (22). FCoV-1 is the more prevalent serotype currently in circulation and therefore represents the dominant cause of clinical FIP (80% to 90%). However, compared to FCoV-2, a disproportionally small amount of data exists on FCoV-1 because of difficulties associated with cultivating these viruses in vitro.

Cellular entry is the first step in the infectious cycle of a coronavirus and is mediated by the binding of the S protein to receptors on the surface of target cells (9). Aminopeptidase N ([APN] CD13) was first identified as the primary receptor for FCoVs (26, 27). However, later studies claimed that APN is utilized only by FCoV-2 strains, while FCoV-1 uses an as yet unidentified receptor (6, 11). It has been proposed that this difference in receptor utilization is responsible for the markedly different behaviors of FCoV-1 and FCoV-2 in cell culture (6). In addition to recognizing a primary receptor, coronaviruses also use of a variety of coreceptors during entry, including C-type lectins (5, 13-15, 23).

The human C-type lectin dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN) has been shown to enhance the entry of many viruses including FIPV; however, a feline DC-SIGN (fDC-SIGN) homologue has yet to be identified (21). To identify a potential fDC-SIGN homologue, shotgun sequencing data of the feline genome were searched using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST), with the canine DC-SIGN homologue (EU670674) as a template. This identified the fDC-SIGN gene with 98% exon coverage derived from four contiguous sequences (NCBI accession numbers ACBE01052350.1, AANG01184685.1, ACBE01052349.1, and AANG01554893.1). Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) primers were designed from these sequences (fDCFwd, ATGTGTGACCCCAAGGAGCCGGAT; fDC-Rev, TCAGAGGCCCGGGCAGGGGGACGA). Since human DC-SIGN has been shown to be highly expressed in dendritic cells (DCs) (10), fDC-Fwd and fDC-Rev were used to perform RT-PCR on RNA purified from feline monocyte-derived DCs prepared as previously described (8). In short, primary feline blood-derived monocytes were purified and pooled from two specific-pathogen-free (SPF) cats (Cornell East Campus Research Facility) by standard Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation. Cells were allowed to attach to glass coverslips and were incubated with recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; 50 ng/ml), recombinant interleukin-4 (IL-4; 10 ng/ml), and 3% feline serum at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. Typical DC morphology was observed after 7 days, and differentiation was confirmed with anti-major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC-II) and anti-CD14 antibodies. RNA was purified from feline DCs using a Qiagen RNeasy Kit, and RT-PCR was performed using a Qiagen One-Step RT-PCR Kit, both used as specified by the manufacturer. This yielded a 0.8-kb band which was submitted for direct nucleotide sequencing, resulting in a sequence with a single open reading frame (ORF) coding for a protein with 85.7% sequence homology to canine DC-SIGN. After sequence verification, the fDC-SIGN ORF was subcloned into a mammalian expression vector with a C-terminal c-myc tag to facilitate detection in downstream applications.

The 756-nucleotide (nt) fDC-SIGN ORF codes for a 251-amino-acid (aa) protein (Fig. 1A) that is predicted to be a type II transmembrane protein according to the dense alignment surface method (3). Similar to human DC-SIGN, the cytoplasmic tail of fDC-SIGN contains a dileucine motif and a tyrosine-based endocytosis motif (1). However, the triacidic amino acid cluster present in human DC-SIGN has been disrupted by a proline residue (Fig. 1A). The extracellular domain consists of a characteristic neck region 56 aa in length, followed by a highly conserved 132-aa carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) (7). The CRD of human DC-SIGN has been shown to bind two Ca2+ ions using two distinct motifs (7), both of which are fully conserved in the fDC-SIGN homologue. In addition, eight cysteines which are highly conserved in all reported DC-SIGN homologues are also present in the fDC-SIGN homologue. fDC-SIGN possesses a high level of amino acid sequence homology with canine DC-SIGN (85.7%) but shares only 41.8% homology with human DC-SIGN. An analysis of protein phylogeny places fDC-SIGN in a distinct lineage separate from primates (Fig. 1B). fDC-SIGN most closely groups with homologues from other nonprimate mammals (canine DC-SIGN, bovine DC-SIGN, porcine DC-SIGN, and equine DC-SIGN).

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

The sequence and phylogenetic analysis of feline DC-SIGN. (A) For each pair of lines, the nucleotide sequence of fDC-SIGN is shown as the top line in regular font, and the amino acid sequence of fDC-SIGN is shown in boldface as the bottom line. The transmembrane domain is boxed, and the glycan binding domain is underlined. (B) A phylogenetic tree of DC-SIGN sequences generated by Clustal W alignment.

To investigate whether FCoVs can utilize fDC-SIGN during cellular entry, CRFK cells stably expressing fDC-SIGN were created (CRFK-fDC-SIGN) using standard selection techniques with the antibiotic G418. We first tested the effect of fDC-SIGN expression on the cellular entry on the FCoV-2 isolate FIPV-1146. Infection of CRFK-fDC-SIGN cells by FIPV-1146 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1 resulted in an infection rate of 36%, an enhancement of 4.5-fold compared to CRFK cells (8%) (Fig. 2). At a higher MOI of 0.5, the enhancement effect was less but still discernible (57% infection of CRFK-fDC-SIGN cells versus 36% infection CRFK cells). At an MOI of 1 there was virtually no difference in infection rates (Fig. 2B).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

Effect of fDC-SIGN expression on the cellular entry of FIPV-1146 and FIPV-TN406. CRFK or CRFK-fDC-SIGN cells were infected with either FIPV-1146 or FIPV-TN406 at an MOI of 0.1 or 0.5, respectively. Cell were fixed with paraformaldehyde at 6 h and 18 h, respectively; IgG2a anti-group 1 coronavirus monoclonal antibody FIPV3-70 was used to stain infected cells, IgG1 anti-myc monoclonal antibody 9E10 was used to stain myc-tagged fDC-SIGN, and Hoechst stain was used for nuclei. Secondary goat anti-mouse IgG1-Alexa Fluor 568 and IgG2a-Alexa Fluor 488 were used for detection (A). For quantification, cells were infected with FIPV-1146 and FIPV-TN406 at MOIs of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 and processed as previously described. At least 1,000 cells were scored from three independent replicates for each experimental condition (B). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

Although the FCoV-1 strain FIPV-TN406 was first isolated in cell culture by coculturing uninfected CRFK cells with peritoneal macrophages from a cat infected with FIPV (2), CRFK cells alone do not efficiently support FCoV-1 propagation (6, 19). In support of this observation, infection of CRFK cells by FIPV-TN406 at MOIs of 0.1, 0.5, and 1 resulted in minimal levels of infection (<1%) (Fig. 2). However, expression of fDC-SIGN substantially rescued infection by FIPV-TN406 at an MOI of 0.1 (12% infection), 0.5 (23% infection), and 1 (43% infection) (Fig. 2B). We theorized that the few cell lines which have been reported to support growth of FCoV-1 in vitro may therefore express high levels of mannose-binding lectins. It has recently been reported that AKD (feline lung) cells support the efficient growth of FIPV-TN406 in vitro (17), and this observation has been verified in our laboratory. AKD cells were therefore pretreated with mannan and infected with FIPV-TN406 at a range of MOIs. As shown in Fig. 3, pretreatment with 100 μg/ml of mannan reduced infection of AKD cells by FIPV-TN406 inoculated at an MOI of 0.1 (9% reduction), 0.5 (23% reduction), and 1 (54% reduction) compared to untreated cells.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Effect of mannan pretreatment on the entry of FIPV-1146 and FIPV-TN406 in CRFK-fDC-SIGN and AKD cells. CRFK-fDC-SIGN or AKD cells were pretreated with mannan (100 μg/ml) or medium only (control) and then infected with either FIPV-1146 or FIPV-TN406 at MOIs of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0. Cells were fixed and stained for viral infection as previously described. At least 1,000 cells were scored from three independent replicates for each experimental condition. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

Considering that DCs are known to highly express DC-SIGN, we also sought to investigate if feline DCs could be infected by FIPV in vitro and whether infection would be dependent on cellular mannose-binding activity. As shown in Fig. 4 feline DCs were highly susceptible to infection by both FIPV-1146 and FIPV-TN406. Infection was marked by a high proportion of syncytia not previously observed in undifferentiated blood-derived mononuclear cells (20). To determine the effect of mannose-binding lectins on DC entry, cells were pretreated with mannan and infected with FIPV-1146 or FIPV-TN406. Pretreatment with 100 μg/ml of mannan reduced infection of feline DCs by both FIPV-1146 (64% reduction) and FIPV-TN406 (84% reduction) (Fig. 4).

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Effect of mannan pretreatment on the entry of FIPV-1146 and FIPV-TN406 in primary feline-derived dendritic cells. Primary feline monocytes were purified by standard Ficoll-Paque gradient centrifugation and differentiated into DCs. DCs were pretreated with mannan (100 μg/ml) or medium only (control) and infected with either FIPV-1146 or FIPV-TN406 at an MOI of 10. Cells were fixed with paraformaldehyde at 24 h and stained with the anti-group 1 coronavirus monoclonal antibody FIPV3-70, and Hoechst stain was used for nuclei. Secondary goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 was used for detection of infected cells (A). For quantification, at least 450 cells were scored from three independent replicates for each experimental condition (B). Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.

In this study, we show that expression of fDC-SIGN enhances the cellular entry of the FCoV-2 isolate FIPV-1146 (Fig. 2). These data are in agreement with previous work from our laboratory showing that FIPV-1146 and an additional FCoV-2 isolate, FIPV-DF2, can utilize human DC-SIGN as a coreceptor in conjunction with their primary cellular receptor, APN. In the current study we also show that the FCoV-1 isolate FIPV-TN406 can utilize fDC-SIGN as a coreceptor for cellular entry. Specifically, expression of fDC-SIGN renders the feline cell line CRFK permissive to infection by FIPV-TN406. This is notable, considering that previous studies have concluded that CRFK cells lack the primary receptor for FCoV-1 (6). Data presented here suggest that CRFK cells do, in fact, possess the primary receptor necessary for the entry of FCoV-1 but that viruses of this serotype may depend heavily on the mannose-binding activity of lectins (or other coreceptors) to efficiently utilize their primary receptor. The use of feline cell lines engineered to overexpress specific coreceptors (or combinations of coreceptors) may enhance our ability to cultivate and study these underrepresented, yet more clinically relevant, strains.

This study also suggests that feline mannose-binding lectins may play an important role in the development of FIP in vivo. Mannose-binding lectins are expressed in intestinal epithelial tissue, the initial site of feline coronavirus infection (4, 16). Within this region DC-SIGN has been shown to be expressed within the lymphoid tissue of the Peyer's patch (12). Peyer's patch tissue contains a high concentration of DCs and macrophages, cells which have previously been shown to disseminate viruses systemically throughout their host (24, 29). Taken together with data presented in this study, the Peyer's patch represents an area where enteric feline coronaviruses may attempt to extend their tropism, a process which could depend, in part, on the enhancing effect of fDC-SIGN. Further studies on feline mannose-binding lectins such as fDC-SIGN and their role in feline coronavirus pathogenesis could help to clarify events which occur early during the development of FIP.

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The GenBank accession number for the FDC-SIGN sequence is HM237358.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ed Dubovi for kind provision of FIPV-TN406. We also thank A. Damon Ferguson for technical assistance and critical reading of the manuscript.

This work was supported in part by a research grant (to G.R.W.) from the Winn Feline Foundation. A.D.R. was supported by grant T32AI007618 (Training in Molecular Virology and Pathogenesis) from the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Published ahead of print on 19 May 2010.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Azad, A. K., J. B. Torrelles, and L. S. Schlesinger. 2008. Mutation in the DC-SIGN cytoplasmic triacidic cluster motif markedly attenuates receptor activity for phagocytosis and endocytosis of mannose-containing ligands by human myeloid cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 84:1594-1603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Black, J. W. 1980. Recovery and in vitro cultivation of a coronavirus from laboratory-induced cases of feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). Vet. Med. Small Anim. Clin. 75:811-814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cserzo, M., E. Wallin, I. Simon, G. von Heijne, and A. Elofsson. 1997. Prediction of transmembrane alpha-helices in prokaryotic membrane proteins: the dense alignment surface method. Protein Eng. 10:673-676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dann, S. M., and L. Eckmann. 2007. Innate immune defenses in the intestinal tract. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 23:115-120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.de Haan, C. A., Z. Li, E. te Lintelo, B. J. Bosch, B. J. Haijema, and P. J. Rottier. 2005. Murine coronavirus with an extended host range uses heparan sulfate as an entry receptor. J. Virol. 79:14451-14456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dye, C., N. Temperton, and S. G. Siddell. 2007. Type I feline coronavirus spike glycoprotein fails to recognize aminopeptidase N as a functional receptor on feline cell lines. J. Gen. Virol. 88:1753-1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Feinberg, H., D. A. Mitchell, K. Drickamer, and W. Il Weis. 2001. Structural basis for selective recognition of oligosaccharides by DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR. Science 294:2163-2166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Freer, G., D. Matteucci, P. Mazzetti, L. Bozzacco, and M. Bendinelli. 2005. Generation of feline dendritic cells derived from peripheral blood monocytes for in vivo use. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 12:1202-1208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gallagher, T. M., and M. J. Buchmeier. 2001. Coronavirus spike proteins in viral entry and pathogenesis. Virology 279:371-374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Geijtenbeek, T. B., R. Torensma, S. J. van Vliet, G. C. van Duijnhoven, G. J. Adema, Y. van Kooyk, and C. G. Figdor. 2000. Identification of DC-SIGN, a novel dendritic cell-specific ICAM-3 receptor that supports primary immune responses. Cell 100:575-585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hohdatsu, T., Y. Izumiya, Y. Yokoyama, K. Kida, and H. Koyama. 1998. Differences in virus receptor for type I and type II feline infectious peritonitis virus. Arch. Virol. 143:839-850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jameson, B., F. Baribaud, S. Pöhlmann, D. Ghavimi, F. Mortari, R. W. Doms, and A. Iwasaki. 2002. Expression of DC-SIGN by dendritic cells of intestinal and genital mucosae in humans and rhesus macaques. J. Virol. 76:1866-1875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jeffers, S. A., E. M. Hemmila, and K. V. Holmes. 2006. Human coronavirus 229E can use CD209L (L-SIGN) to enter cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 581:265-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jeffers, S. A., S. M. Tusell, L. Gillim-Ross, E. M. Hemmila, J. E. Achenbach, G. J. Babcock, W. D. Thomas, Jr., L. B. Thackray, M. D. Young, R. J. Mason, D. M. Ambrosino, D. E. Wentworth, J. C. Demartini, and K. V. Holmes. 2004. CD209L (L-SIGN) is a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:15748-15753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Madu, I. G., V. C. Chu, H. Lee, A. D. Regan, B. E. Bauman, and G. R. Whittaker. 2007. Heparan sulfate is a selective attachment factor for the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus Beaudette. Avian Dis. 51:45-51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mukherjee, S., C. L. Partch, R. E. Lehotzky, C. V. Whitham, H. Chu, C. L. Bevins, K. H. Gardner, and L. V. Hooper. 2009. Regulation of C-type lectin antimicrobial activity by a flexible N-terminal prosegment. J. Biol. Chem. 284:4881-4888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Neuman, B. W., B. D. Adair, C. Yoshioka, J. D. Quispe, R. A. Milligan, M. Yeager, and M. J. Buchmeier. 2006. Ultrastructure of SARS-CoV, FIPV, and MHV revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 581:181-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pedersen, N. C. 2009. A review of feline infectious peritonitis virus infection: 1963-2008. J. Feline Med. Surg. 11:225-258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pedersen, N. C., J. W. Black, J. F. Boyle, J. F. Evermann, A. J. McKeirnan, and R. L. Ott. 1984. Pathogenic differences between various feline coronavirus isolates. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 173:365-380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Regan, A. D., R. Shraybman, R. D. Cohen, and G. R. Whittaker. 2008. Differential role for low pH and cathepsin-mediated cleavage of the viral spike protein during entry of serotype II feline coronaviruses. Vet. Microbiol. 132:235-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Regan, A. D., and G. R. Whittaker. 2008. Utilization of DC-SIGN for entry of feline coronaviruses into host cells. J. Virol. 82:11992-119926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rottier, P. J. 1999. The molecular dynamics of feline coronaviruses. Vet. Microbiol. 69:117-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schwegmann-Wessels, C., and G. Herrler. 2006. Sialic acids as receptor determinants for coronaviruses. Glycoconj. J. 23:51-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sharova, N., C. Swingler, M. Sharkey, and M. Stevenson. 2005. Macrophages archive HIV-1 virions for dissemination in trans. EMBO J. 24:2481-2489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Stoddart, C. A., and F. W. Scott. 1989. Intrinsic resistance of feline peritoneal macrophages to coronavirus infection correlates with in vivo virulence. J. Virol. 63:436-440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tresnan, D. B., R. Levis, and K. V. Holmes. 1996. Feline aminopeptidase N serves as a receptor for feline, canine, porcine, and human coronaviruses in serogroup I. J. Virol. 70:8669-8674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tusell, S. M., S. A. Schittone, and K. V. Holmes. 2007. Mutational analysis of aminopeptidase N, a receptor for several group 1 coronaviruses, identifies key determinants of viral host range. J. Virol. 81:1261-1273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Weiss, R. C., and F. W. Scott. 1981. Pathogenesis of feline infectious peritonitis: pathologic changes and immunofluorescence. Am. J. Vet. Res. 42:2036-2048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wu, L., and V. N. KewalRamani. 2006. Dendritic-cell interactions with HIV: infection and viral dissemination. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6:859-868. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Virology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES