Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Cancer logoLink to BMC Cancer
. 2010 Jun 22;10:320. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-320

Relationships between hypoxia markers and the leptin system, estrogen receptors in human primary and metastatic breast cancer: effects of preoperative chemotherapy

Mariusz Koda 1,✉, Luiza Kanczuga-Koda 1, Mariola Sulkowska 1, Eva Surmacz 2, Stanislaw Sulkowski 1
PMCID: PMC2898699  PMID: 20569445

Abstract

Background

Tumor hypoxia is marked by enhanced expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-α (HIF-1α) and glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1). Hypoxic conditions have also been associated with overexpression of angiogenic factors, such as leptin. The aim of our study was to analyze the relationships between hypoxia markers HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin, leptin receptor (ObR) and other breast cancer biomarkers in primary and metastatic breast cancer in patients treated or untreated with preoperative chemotherapy.

Methods

The expression of different biomarkers was examined by immunohistochemistry in 116 primary breast cancers and 65 lymph node metastases. Forty five of these samples were obtained form patients who received preoperative chemotherapy and 71 from untreated patients.

Results

In primary tumors without preoperative chemotherapy, HIF-1α and Glut-1 were positively correlated (p = 0.02, r = 0.437). HIF-1α in primary and metastatic tumors without preoperative therapy positively correlated with leptin (p < 0.0001, r = 0.532; p = 0.013, r = 0.533, respectively) and ObR (p = 0.002, r = 0.319; p = 0.083, r = 0.387, respectively). Hypoxia markers HIF-1α and Glut-1 were negatively associated with estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and positively correlated with estrogen receptor beta (ERβ). In this group of tumors, a positive correlation between Glut-1 and proliferation marker Ki-67 (p = 0.017, r = 0.433) was noted. The associations between HIF-1α and Glut-1, HIF-1α and leptin, HIF-1α and ERα as well as Glut-1 and ERβ were lost following preoperative chemotherapy.

Conclusions

Intratumoral hypoxia in breast cancer is marked by coordinated expression of such markers as HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin and ObR. The relationships among these proteins can be altered by preoperative chemotherapy.

Background

During breast cancer development and progression, rapidly proliferating neoplastic cells are often exposed to hypoxia resulting from insufficient local supply of oxygen and nutrition [1]. Hypoxia can affect developing tumor two-way. On one hand, it might inhibit proliferation and stimulate apoptotic or necrotic cell death, while it can also induce progression of neoplasms and cause resistance to anti-cancer treatments. In developing tumors, hypoxic cells are more resistant to ionizing radiation and chemotherapy, display a more invasive and metastatic phenotype, and increased genetic instability. Limited oxygen concentration in tumor tissue is known to modulate (inhibit or stimulate) gene expression as well as affect metabolic processes [2-5].

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) are two known markers of tissue oxygenation. HIF-1 is heterodimeric transcription factor that consists of a constitutively expressed HIF-1β subunit and a hypoxia-induced HIF-1α subunit [6,7]. Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1α is rapidly degraded, but hypoxia or activation of certain intracellular pathways, such as the PI-3K and ERK1/2 pathways, induce accumulation of this protein and its translocation to the nucleus. Additionally, HIF-1α expression can be upregulated due to loss of tumor suppressor genes PTEN and p53 [7,8]. HIF-1α binds to Hypoxia Response Elements (HRE, 5'-RCGTG-3') within regulatory regions of target genes whose protein products are implicated in metabolism, growth, angiogenesis and apoptosis [9-11]. Expression of HIF-1α is characteristic of early stages of carcinogenesis and has been correlated with increased intratumoral angiogenesis, cancer progression, poor patient prognosis and chemo- as well as radio- resistance [12-14].

Glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) is another protein whose expression in tumor is hypoxia-dependent [15-17]. Glut-1 exerts cytoprotective effect enabling glucose transport into hypoxic cells, and preventing hypoxia-induced cell death. Glut-1 accumulation was observed in cancer cells in regions near necrotic areas in tumors [18]. Under hypoxic conditions, Glut-1 expression can be enhanced by HIF-1α [19]. Hayashi et al. (2004) found that this phenomenon involves HIF-1α interaction with a HRE site in the Glut-1 promoter [20].

In breast cancer, increased expression of Glut-1 was associated with higher invasiveness of breast cancer cell lines and with the poorly differentiated phenotype in human ductal mammary cancers [21]. Glut-1 overexpression in colorectal cancer cells was associated with rapid cancer progression and inversely correlated with prognosis [22]. In breast and lung cancer cell models, blocking of Glut-1 with specific antibodies reduced growth and induced apoptosis [23]. We found significant coexpression of Glut-1, and apoptotic regulators Bcl-xL and Bax in colorectal cancer, which could suggest cooperation among these proteins in processes such as elimination of cells due to irreversible injury, adaptation to hypoxia, reduction of further damage, and survival [16].

Hypoxia can also upregulate the expression of a cytokine leptin (Ob) - a multifunctional peptide hormone that has been implicated in cancer cell growth, transformation, metastasis and resistance to cancer treatments [24-33]. Our recent study indicated that leptin and the leptin receptor (ObR) were significantly overexpressed in primary breast cancer and lymph node metastasis relative to non-cancer mammary epithelium [34]. The leptin gene promoter contains eight HRE with the minimal core sequence 5'-RCGTG-3' that can recruit HIF-1α [35]. Recently, we demonstrated that in breast cancer cells, leptin and ObR expression can be activated in response to hypoxia or hyperinsulinemia [34,36]. In the case of leptin expression, the process was mediated through HIF-1 and/or Sp-1-dependent transcription [37,38].

Here we analyzed the relationships between hypoxia-related proteins (HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin, ObR) and other cancer biomarkers in primary breast cancer and lymph node metastases. We also assessed the impact of preoperative chemotherapy (neoadjuvant therapy) on the correlative expression of these proteins.

Methods

Patients and tissue samples

The expression of HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin, ObR, estrogen receptors ERα, ERβ and Ki-67 was assessed in breast cancer samples obtained from 116 women, aged 30-82 years (mean age 54.4), who underwent partial or total mastectomy and lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer. Forty five patients from this group underwent preoperative chemotherapy (neoadjuvant therapy) following Ansfield (cyclophosphamid, prednison, 5-fluorouracyl, metotrexate and vincristin) or CMF (cyclophosphamid, metotrexat, 5-fluorouracyl) regimens. As the aim of the present study was not the evaluation of the impact of a particular preoperative chemotherapy regimen, all the Ansfiled and CMF patients were analyzed as one group.

Tissue samples were fixed in 10% buffered formaldehyde solution, embedded in paraffin blocks at 56°C and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Histopathological examination of sections was based on the WHO and pTN classification of breast tumors [39]. These human studies were performed in agreement with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its latest revision in 2000, and approved by the Ethics Committee at Medical University of Bialystok. All subjects signed informed consent before inclusion in the study. In order to uniform the examined group without neoadjuvant therapy, the analysis included selected cases of invasive ductal carcinomas in grade G2 (49 patients without preoperative chemotherapy) and G3 (22 patients without preoperative chemotherapy) and in stage pT1 (43 patients without preoperative chemotherapy) and pT2 (28 patients without preoperative chemotherapy). Tumor stage and grade were impossible to determine in the group of tumors after chemotherapy because of numerous morphological changes in epithelial and stromal tissue components. The presence of lymph node metastases was found at the time of diagnosis in 35 patients (49.3%) who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy and in 30 patients (66.7%) who underwent preoperative chemotherapy.

Immunohistochemistry

The immunohistochemical analysis of HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin (Ob), ObR, ERα, ERβ, and Ki-67 expression was carried out using 5 μm consecutive tissue sections obtained from tissue samples, as described by us previously in detail [16,28-30,34,40]. The sections were dewaxed in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohols. After antigen unmasking and endogenous peroxidase removal, nonspecific binding was blocked by incubating the slides for 1 h with 1.5% normal serum in PBS. Next, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies (Abs). The following Abs were used for marker detection: for HIF-1α, rabbit polyclonal Ab (sc-10790; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA), dilution 1:400; for Glut-1, rabbit polyclonal Ab (A3536; Dako, Denmark), dilution 1:250; for leptin, rabbit polyclonal Ab (pAb) A-20 (Santa Cruz, USA), dilution 1:100; for ObR, rabbit pAb H-300 (Santa Cruz, USA), dilution 1:75; for ERα, mouse monoclonal Ab (mAb) F-10 (Santa Cruz, USA), dilution 1:200; for ERβ, rabbit pAb H-150 (Santa Cruz, USA), dilution 1:200; and for Ki-67, mouse mAb MIB-1 (Dako, Denmark), dilution 1:100. The analysis of leptin, ObR, ERα and ERβ was performed with avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (ABC Staining System, Santa Cruz, USA), for HIF-1α and Glut-1 with EnVision method (Dako, Denmark), and for Ki-67 with streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex (LSAB kit, Dako, Denmark) to reveal Ab-antigen reactions. All slides were counterstained with hematoxylin. Breast specimens previously classified as positive for the expression of the studied markers were used for control and protocol standardization. In negative controls, primary Abs were omitted. The expression of leptin, ObR, ERα, ERβ, and Ki-67 was analyzed by light microscopy in 10 different section fields, and the mean percentage of tumor cells displaying positive staining was scored. The expression of leptin and ObR in cancer samples was classified using a four-point scale: 0, <10% positive cells; 1+, 10-50% positive cells with weak staining; 2+, >50% positive cells with weak staining; 3+, >50% positive cells with strong staining. ERα and ERβ were classified as follows: 0, <10% cells with positive staining; 1+, 10-50% cells with positive staining; 2+, 50-80% cells with positive staining; 3+ >80% cells with positive staining. Ki-67 expression was classified as follows: 0, <10% cells with positive staining; 1+, 10-40% cells with positive staining; 2+ >40% cells with positive staining. For HIF-1α and Glut-1, we applied a 3-grade scoring system as follows: 0, <10% immunoreactive cancer cells; 1+, 10-50% immunoreactive cancer cells; 2+, >50% of immunoreactive malignant cells.

Statistical analysis

Spearman test was used to analyze correlations among leptin, ObR, HIF-1α, Glut-1, ERα, ERβ, and Ki-67 expression in primary and metastatic breast cancer in the group with and without preoperative chemotherapy. Values of p < 0.05 were taken as statistically significant.

Results

The positivity scores for HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin, ObR, ERα, ERβ and Ki-67 in primary and metastatic breast cancer in the group without and with preoperative chemotherapy are included in Table 1 and 2. We found a significant correlation between HIF-1α and leptin expression in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in patients who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy (Table 3 and 4). This relationship was not observed in breast tumors of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. On the other hand, the expression of HIF-1α was correlated with the presence of ObR in primary breast cancer regardless of preoperative treatment (Table 3 and 4). In lymph node metastases from women without neoadjuvant therapy, a trend toward a positive correlation between HIF-1α and ObR was detected (Table 4). However, in lymph node metastases from patients after neodjuvant therapy, HIF-1α and ObR were not associated (Table 4).

Table 1.

Positivity scores for different biomarkers in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in patients without preoperative chemotherapy.

Biomarkers Primary tumors; n = 71 Lymph node metastases; n = 35
0 1+ 2+ 3+ 0 1+ 2+ 3+
HIF-1α 27 21 23 - 11 9 15 -
GLUT-1 38 21 12 - 24 5 6 -
Ob 10 24 28 9 3 6 15 11
ObR 44 16 7 4 17 7 8 3
ERα 21 11 27 12 11 8 7 9
ERβ 10 22 27 12 5 10 9 11
Ki-67 20 29 22 - 9 18 8 -
Open in a new tab

n - number of studied cases.

Table 2.

Positivity scores for different biomarkers in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in patients after preoperative chemotherapy.

Biomarkers Primary tumors; n = 45 Lymph node metastases; n = 30
0 1+ 2+ 3+ 0 1+ 2+ 3+
HIF-1α 10 24 11 - 5 13 12 -
GLUT-1 24 16 5 - 15 11 4 -
Ob 9 15 18 3 4 9 14 3
ObR 29 11 5 0 12 6 8 4
ERα 17 10 11 7 10 6 6 8
ERβ 9 9 23 4 5 5 13 7
Ki-67 17 20 8 - 11 13 6 -
Open in a new tab

n - number of studied cases.

Table 3.

Correlation between HIF-1α, GLUT-1 and other studied biomarkers in primary breast cancer in patients without and after preoperative chemotherapy.

Compared biomarkers Primary tumors without preoperative chemotherapy; n = 71 Primary tumors after preoperative chemotherapy; n = 45
p r P r
HIF-1α - Ob <0.0001 0.532 0.116 0.288
HIF-1α - ObR 0.002 0.319 0.007 0.445
HIF-1α - ERα 0.055 -0.194 0.244 0.191
HIF-1α - ERβ 0.002 0.408 0.031 0.346
HIF-1α - Ki-67 0.822 -0.031 0.801 0.042
HIF-1α -GLUT-1 0.02 0.437 0.625 -0.087
GLUT-1 - Ob 0.930 0.018 0.431 0.152
GLUT-1 - ObR 0.472 0.139 0.338 -0.165
GLUT-1 - ERα 0.022 -0.410 0.038 -0.337
GLUT-1 - ERβ 0.008 0.467 0.281 0.179
GLUT-1 - Ki-67 0.017 0.433 0.050 0.320
Open in a new tab

n - number of studied cases.

Table 4.

Correlation between HIF-1α, GLUT-1 and other studied biomarkers in lymph node metastases in patients without and after preoperative chemotherapy.

Compared biomarkers Lymph node metastases without preoperative chemotherapy; n = 35 Lymph node metastases after preoperative chemotherapy; n = 30
P r p r
HIF-1α - Ob 0.013 0.533 0.465 0.168
HIF-1α - ObR 0.083 0.387 0.150 0.302
HIF-1α - ERα 0.133 -0.327 0.908 0.024
HIF-1α - ERβ 0.119 0.474 0.188 0.272
HIF-1α - Ki-67 0.604 -0.167 0.951 -0.013
HIF-1α -GLUT-1 0.776 -0.177 0.401 -0.198
GLUT-1 - Ob 0.405 0.242 0.361 -0.209
GLUT-1 - ObR 0.261 -0.309 0.335 -0.216
GLUT-1 - ERα 0.017 -0.606 0.021 -0.469
GLUT-1 - ERβ 0.677 -0.117 0.785 0.059
GLUT-1 - Ki-67 0.078 0.468 0.749 0.069
Open in a new tab

n - number of studied cases.

Glut-1 did not correlate with leptin or ObR in any studied group of breast tumors (Table 3 and 4). On the other hand, a positive correlation between HIF-1α and Glut-1 was found in primary tumors, but not in lymph node metastasis in patients without preoperative chemotherapy (Table 3). The association between HIF-1α and Glut-1 was not observed in primary or metastatic cancers in patients who received neoadjuvant therapy (Table 3 and 4).

Next, we studied relationships between hypoxia markers and estrogen receptor expression. In primary tumors without preoperative chemotherapy, we noted a trend toward a negative correlation between HIF-1α expression and ERα (p = 0.055, r= -0.194; Table 3). These associations were absent in lymph node metastases. HIF-1α and ERα did not correlate in primary tumors and metastases from patients who underwent preoperative chemotherapy (Table 3 and 4).

Glut-1 negatively correlated with ERα expression in primary tumors and in lymph node metastases in biopsies from all patients, regardless of preoperative treatment (Table 3 and 4). ERβ positively correlated with HIF-1α in primary tumors, both in patients with and without preoperative chemotherapy (Table 3), and with Glut-1 in primary tumors without preoperative chemotherapy (Table 3).

Finally, we evaluated the link between HIF-1α, Glut-1 and the proliferation marker Ki-67. A positive correlation between Glut-1 and Ki-67 was noted in primary and metastatic cancer biopsies from patients without preoperative chemotherapy (Table 3, 4). In the group of primary tumors after neodjuvant therapy, we observed a trend toward a positive correlation in primary tumors only (Table 3). On the other hand, HIF-1α did not correlate with Ki-67 in primary tumors or in lymph node metastases in both studied groups of patients (Table 3 and 4).

Discussion

In this study we analyzed the relationships among hypoxia-inducible proteins (i.e., HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin, and ObR) and other biomarkers (i.e., estrogen receptors and Ki-67) in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Our second goal was to evaluate potential influence of preoperative chemotherapy on associations among studied proteins. The major findings of our study can be summarized as follows: 1) HIF-1α and Glut-1 are positively correlated in primary tumors without preoperative chemotherapy; 2) HIF-1α positively correlate with the leptin system in primary and metastatic breast cancer without preoperative chemotherapy; 3) the leptin system is not associated with Glut-1 expression in all studied groups; 4) Glut-1 correlates negatively with ERα in primary and metastatic tumors, regardless of preoperative chemotherapy; 5) hypoxia markers correlate positively with ERβ expression in primary tumors, especially in the group without preoperative therapy; 6) Glut-1 expression is positively associated with Ki-67 in primary tumors, while in lymph node metastases, a trend toward positive correlation between these proteins is found in the group without therapy; 7) preoperative chemotherapy influences the associations between HIF-1α and leptin in primary and metastatic tumors, HIF-1α and ObR in metastatic tumors, HIF-1α and Glut-1 in primary tumors; Glut-1 and ERβ in primary tumors; Glut-1 and Ki-67 in primary and metastatic tumors.

Hypoxia in solid tumors is associated with the accumulation of HIF-1α and activation of HIF-1-dependent transcription of genes regulating cell motility, invasion, and angiogenesis [14,41]. Bos et al. (2001, 2003) reported that HIF-1α overexpression was associated with more aggressive breast cancer. We speculate that HIF-1 could also improve glucose consumption in hypoxic cancer cells by the stimulation of glucose transporter Glut-1 expression [12,42]. Our results suggest that hypoxic conditions resulted in coordinated upregulation of HIF-1α and Glut-1 in primary tumors. It is consistent with results of Li et al. (2006) who showed that knockdown of HIF-1α in MCF-7 breast cancer cells attenuated the expression of Glut-1 mRNA and other genes [43]. Additionally, the HIF-1α knockdown cells displayed increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents [43]. Interestingly, we noted that the association between HIF-1α and Glut-1 was lost in lymph node metastases as well as in tumors after preoperative chemotherapy. Potentially, this could be related to downregulation of HIF-1 coregulators, such as p300 [44], due to neoadjuvant therapy or genetic rearrangements in metastatic cells [45], which could result in deficient Glut-1 gene transcription [46,47].

The associations between HIF-1α and the leptin system identified by us in this study confirm the results obtained by Cascio et al. (2008), Bartella et al. (2008) and Garofalo et al. (2006) who demonstrated that physiologic hypoxia and/or accumulation of HIF-1α due to hypoxia-mimicking conditions or stabilization of HIF-1a by growth factors can stimulate leptin and/or ObR expression in breast cancer cells [34,36,37].

According to our knowledge, the present analysis is the first to reveal a positive correlation between HIF-1α and leptin, as well as between HIF-1α and ObR not only in primary tumors, but also in metastasis [31,33,34,36-38]. We reported analogous associations in human colorectal cancer [30]. Cumulatively, present and previous data suggest the involvement of tissue hypoxia in the stimulation of leptin and ObR expression in human cancers [28,30,34]. The overexpression of the leptin system could lead to leptin-enhanced tumor growth and progression under hypoxic conditions.

One of the features of breast cancer progression is the development of resistance to hormonal therapy. The possible mechanism of this phenomenon could be related to differential ER expression in metastatic and primary sites, as described by us before [40]. Our present study suggests that tumor malignancy might correlate with loss of ERα expression. Indeed, hypoxia could induce ERα downregulation via proteasome-dependent pathway [48,49]. Cho et al. (2005) suggested that ERα downregulation under hypoxic conditions in human breast cancer involves protein interactions between ERα and HIF-1α [50].

Negative correlation between Glut-1 and ERα found in this study suggests that loss of ERα in breast cancer is associated with overexpression of Glut-1, which could facilitate proliferation, survival and possibly progression and dedifferentiation of cancer cells [51,52].

In contrast to ERα, we noted a positive correlation between ERβ and hypoxia markers HIF-1α, Glut-1. Our observations are consistent with results of Cordadini et al. (2004), who reported that hypoxic conditions upregulated ERβ protein levels in breast cancer cells [53]. Moreover, sequence analysis of the ERβ promoter region contains specific sequence for HRE, which might explain coexpression of ERβ and HIF-1α.

Although preoperative chemotherapy is an integral part of management of patients with advanced breast cancer, its impact on cancer biomarkers and their interrelationships in primary and metastatic tumors is poorly recognized. Our study clearly suggest that preoperative chemotherapy alters the expression of and relationships among several hypoxia-related proteins, specifically, HIF-1α and leptin in primary and metastatic tumors, HIF-1α and ObR in metastatic tumors, HIF-1α and Glut-1 in primary tumors; Glut-1 and ERβ in primary tumors; Glut-1 and Ki-67 in primary and metastatic tumors. These data are reminiscent of previous observations pointing to differential expression of ERα, ERβ and Ki-67 expression in metastatic breast cancer versus primary cancer, and significant influence of preoperative chemotherapy on these biomarkers [40,43,54-56].

Conclusions

In conclusion, our results suggest that breast tumor cells experience hypoxic conditions, as indicated by the expression of such markers as HIF-1α, Glut-1, leptin and ObR. Interestingly, the relationships among these proteins differ in primary and metastatic tumors and might be influenced by preoperative chemotherapy. Thus, analysis of biomarkers in both primary and metastatic tumors before and after chemotherapy could help in understanding the mechanisms of breast cancer progression and select the optimal individualized treatment options.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

MK designed the study, analyzed data and drafted the manuscript; LKK performed statistical analysis and edited the manuscript; MS collected the samples, performed pathological evaluation and edited the manuscript; ES analyzed results and edited the manuscript; SS designed the study, collected the samples, performed pathological evaluation and edited the manuscript.

Pre-publication history

The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/10/320/prepub

Contributor Information

Mariusz Koda, Email: kodamar@zeus.amb.edu.pl.

Luiza Kanczuga-Koda, Email: luizakoda@gmail.com.

Mariola Sulkowska, Email: sulek@zeus.amb.edu.pl.

Eva Surmacz, Email: surmacz@temple.edu.

Stanislaw Sulkowski, Email: sulek@zeus.amb.edu.pl.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Edyta Jelska and Urszula Sulkowska for expert technical assistance in manuscript preparation. This work was supported by Medical University of Bialystok (number of the project 3-14541P).

References

  1. Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26:225–239. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9055-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Liao D, Corle C, Seagroves TN, Johnson RS. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha is a key regulator of metastasis in a transgenic model of cancer initiation and progression. Cancer Res. 2007;67:563–572. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Van den Eynden GG, Van der Auwera I, Van Laere SJ, Colpaert CG, Turley H, Harris AL, van Dam P, Dirix LY, Vermeulen PB, Van Marck EA. Angiogenesis and hypoxia in lymph node metastases is predicted by the angiogenesis and hypoxia in the primary tumour in patients with breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:1128–1136. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Vaupel P, Mayer A, Briest S, Höckel M. Hypoxia in breast cancer: role of blood flow, oxygen diffusion distances, and anemia in the development of oxygen depletion. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2005;566:333–342. doi: 10.1007/0-387-26206-7_44. full_text. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gardner LB, Corn PG. Hypoxic regulation of mRNA expression. Cell Cycle. 2008;7:1916–1924. doi: 10.4161/cc.7.13.6203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang GL, Semenza GL. Purification and characterization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:1230–1237. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.3.1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang GL, Jiang BH, Rue EA, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:5510–5514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zundel W, Schindler C, Haas-Kogan D, Koong A, Kaper F, Chen E, Gottschalk AR, Ryan HE, Johnson RS, Jefferson AB, Stokoe D, Giaccia AJ. Loss of PTEN facilitates HIF-1-mediated gene expression. Genes Dev. 2000;14:391–396. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Semenza GL. Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:721–732. doi: 10.1038/nrc1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Marignol L, Lawler M, Coffey M, Hollywood D. Achieving hypoxia-inducible gene expression in tumors. Cancer Biol Ther. 2005;4:359–364. doi: 10.4161/cbt.4.4.1646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nangaku M, Eckardt KU. Hypoxia and the HIF system in kidney disease. J Mol Med. 2007;85:1325–1330. doi: 10.1007/s00109-007-0278-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bos R, Zhong H, Hanrahan CF, Mommers EC, Semenza GL, Pinedo HM, Abeloff MD, Simons JW, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E. Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha during breast carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:309–314. doi: 10.1093/jnci/93.4.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Generali D, Berruti A, Brizzi MP, Campo L, Bonardi S, Wigfield S, Bersiga A, Allevi G, Milani M, Aguggini S, Gandolfi V, Dogliotti L, Bottini A, Harris AL, Fox SB. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α expression predicts a poor response to primary chemoendocrine therapy and disease-free survival in primary human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:4562–4568. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhong H, De Marzo AM, Laughner E, Lim M, Hilton DA, Zagzag D, Buechler P, Isaacs WB, Semenza GL, Simons JW. Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in common human cancers and their metastases. Cancer Res. 1999;59:5830–5835. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gatenby RA, Smallbone K, Maini PK, Rose F, Averill J, Nagle RB, Worrall L, Gillies RJ. Cellular adaptations to hypoxia and acidosis during somatic evolution of breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:646–653. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Wincewicz A, Sulkowska M, Koda M, Kanczuga-Koda L, Witkowska E, Sulkowski S. Significant coexpression of GLUT-1, Bcl-xL, and Bax in colorectal cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1095:53–61. doi: 10.1196/annals.1397.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sulkowska M, Wincewicz A, Sulkowski S, Koda M, Kanczuga-Koda L. Relations of TGF-β1 with HIF-1α, GLUT-1 and longer survival of colorectal cancer patients. Pathology. 2009;41:254–260. doi: 10.1080/00313020802579318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cooper R, Sarioğlu S, Sökmen S, Füzün M, Küpelioğlu A, Valentine H, Görken IB, Airley R, West C. Glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1): a potential marker of prognosis in rectal carcinoma? Br J Cancer. 2003;89:870–876. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Williams KJ, Telfer BA, Airley RE, Peters HP, Sheridan MR, van der Kogel AJ, Harris AL, Stratford IJ. A protective role for HIF-1 in response to redox manipulation and glucose deprivation: implications for tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2002;21:282–290. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hayashi M, Sakata M, Takeda T, Yamamoto T, Okamoto Y, Sawada K, Kimura A, Minekawa R, Tahara M, Tasaka K, Murata Y. Induction of glucose transporter 1 expression through hypoxia-inducible factor 1α under hypoxic conditions in trophoblast-derived cells. J Endocrinol. 2004;183:145–154. doi: 10.1677/joe.1.05599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grover-McKay M, Walsh SA, Seftor EA, Thomas PA, Hendrix MJ. Role for glucose transporter 1 protein in human breast cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 1998;4:115–120. doi: 10.1007/BF02904704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Haber RS, Rathan A, Weiser KR, Pritsker A, Itzkowitz SH, Bodian C, Slater G, Weiss A, Burstein DE. GLUT1 glucose transporter expression in colorectal carcinoma: a marker for poor prognosis. Cancer. 1998;83:34–40. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980701)83:1&#x0003c;34::AID-CNCR5&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rastogi S, Banerjee S, Chellappan S, Simon GR. Glut-1 antibodies induce growth arrest and apoptosis in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2007;257:244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Garofalo C, Surmacz E. Leptin and cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2006;207:12–22. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Surmacz E. Obesity hormone leptin: a new target in breast cancer? Breast Cancer Res. 2007;9:301. doi: 10.1186/bcr1638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Riolfi M, Ferla R, Del Valle L, Piña-Oviedo S, Scolaro L, Micciolo R, Guidi M, Terrasi M, Cetto GL, Surmacz E. Leptin and its receptor are overexpressed in brain tumors and correlate with the degree of malignancy. Brain Pathol. in press . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  27. Sulkowska M, Golaszewska J, Wincewicz A, Koda M, Baltaziak M, Sulkowski S. Leptin - from regulation of fat metabolism to stimulation of breast cancer growth. Pathol Oncol Res. 2006;12:69–72. doi: 10.1007/BF02893446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Koda M, Sulkowska M, Wincewicz A, Kanczuga-Koda L, Musiatowicz B, Szymanska M, Sulkowski S. Expression of leptin, leptin receptor, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in human endometrial cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1095:90–98. doi: 10.1196/annals.1397.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Koda M, Sulkowska M, Kanczuga-Koda L, Surmacz E, Sulkowski S. Overexpression of the obesity hormone leptin in human colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:902–906. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.041004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Koda M, Sulkowska M, Kanczuga-Koda L, Cascio S, Colucci G, Russo A, Surmacz E, Sulkowski S. Expression of the obesity hormone leptin and its receptor correlates with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in human colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(Suppl 6):116–119. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Koda M, Sulkowska M, Kanczuga-Koda L, Jarzabek K, Sulkowski S. Expression of leptin and its receptor in female breast cancer in relation with selected apoptotic markers. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2007;45(Suppl 1):187–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vona-Davis L, Rose DP. Adipokines as endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine factors in breast cancer risk and progression. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007;14:189–206. doi: 10.1677/ERC-06-0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Fiorio E, Mercanti A, Terrasi M, Micciolo R, Remo A, Auriemma A, Molino A, Parolin V, Di Stefano B, Bonetti F, Giordano A, Cetto GL, Surmacz E. Leptin/HER2 crosstalk in breast cancer: in vitro study and preliminary in vivo analysis. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:305. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Garofalo C, Koda M, Cascio S, Sulkowska M, Kanczuga-Koda L, Golaszewska J, Russo A, Sulkowski S, Surmacz E. Increased expression of leptin and the leptin receptor as a marker of breast cancer progression: possible role of obesity-related stimuli. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:1447–1453. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Grosfeld A, Andre J, Hauguel-De Mouzon S, Berra E, Pouyssegur J, Guerre-Millo M. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 transactivates the human leptin gene promoter. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:42953–42957. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M206775200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bartella V, Cascio S, Fiorio E, Auriemma A, Russo A, Surmacz E. Insulin-dependent leptin expression in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2008;68:4919–4927. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Cascio S, Bartella V, Auriemma A, Johannes GJ, Russo A, Giordano A, Surmacz E. Mechanism of leptin expression in breast cancer cells: role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. Oncogene. 2008;27:540–547. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Terrasi M, Fiorio E, Mercanti A, Koda M, Moncada CA, Sulkowski S, Merali S, Russo A, Surmacz E. Functional analysis of the -2548G/A leptin gene polymorphism in breast cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1038–1044. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tavassoli FA. In: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the breast and female genital organs. Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, editor. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003. Tumours of the breast; pp. 9–112. [Google Scholar]
  40. Koda M, Sulkowski S, Kanczuga-Koda L, Surmacz E, Sulkowska M. Expression of ERα, ERβ and Ki-67 in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2004;11:753–759. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hirota K, Semenza GL. Regulation of angiogenesis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006;59:15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Bos R, van der Groep P, Greijer AE, Shvarts A, Meijer S, Pinedo HM, Semenza GL, van Diest PJ, van der Wall E. Levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α independently predict prognosis in patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2003;97:1573–1581. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Li J, Shi M, Cao Y, Yuan W, Pang T, Li B, Sun Z, Chen L, Zhao RC. Knockdown of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in breast carcinoma MCF-7 cells results in reduced tumor growth and increased sensitivity to methotrexate. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;342:1341–1351. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.02.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Freedman SJ, Sun ZY, Poy F, Kung AL, Livingston DM, Wagner G, Eck MJ. Structural basis for recruitment of CBP/p300 by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5367–5372. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082117899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang C, Li K, Wei L, Li Z, Yu P, Teng L, Wu K, Zhu J. p300 expression repression by hypermethylation associated with tumour invasion and metastasis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2007;60:1249–1253. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2006.044099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen C, Pore N, Behrooz A, Ismail-Beigi F, Maity A. Regulation of glut1 mRNA by hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Interaction between H-ras and hypoxia. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:9519–9525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M010144200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vleugel MM, Shvarts D, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ. p300 and p53 levels determine activation of HIF-1 downstream targets in invasive breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 2006;37:1085–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Cooper C, Liu GY, Niu YL, Santos S, Murphy LC, Watson PH. Intermittent hypoxia induces proteasome-dependent down-regulation of estrogen receptor alpha in human breast carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:8720–8727. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kurebayashi J, Otsuki T, Moriya T, Sonoo H. Hypoxia reduces hormone responsiveness of human breast cancer cells. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001;92:1093–1101. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2001.tb01064.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Cho J, Kim D, Lee S, Lee Y. Cobalt chloride-induced estrogen receptor alpha down-regulation involves hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2005;19:1191–1199. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kang SS, Chun YK, Hur MH, Lee HK, Kim YJ, Hong SR, Lee JH, Lee SG, Park YK. Clinical significance of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) expression in human breast carcinoma. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2002;93:1123–1128. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2002.tb01214.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rastogi S, Banerjee S, Chellappan S, Simon GR. Glut-1 antibodies induce growth arrest and apoptosis in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2007;257:244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Coradini D, Pellizzaro C, Speranza A, Daidone MG. Hypoxia and estrogen receptor profile influence the responsiveness of human breast cancer cells to estradiol and antiestrogens. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61:76–82. doi: 10.1007/s00018-003-3324-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Koda M, Lenczewski A, Sulkowska M, Kanczuga-Koda L, Wincewicz A, Tomaszewski J, Sulkowski S. The effect of chemotherapy on status of estrogen receptors in primary tumors and lymph node metastases of human ductal breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2007;17:385–391. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Koda M, Sulkowska M, Kanczuga-Koda L, Tomaszewski J, Kucharczuk W, Lesniewicz T, Cymek S, Sulkowski S. The effect of chemotherapy on Ki-67, Bcl-2 and Bak expression in primary tumors and lymph node metastases of breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2007;18:113–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Jain V, Landry M, Levine EA. The stability of estrogen and progesterone receptors in patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. Am Surg. 1996;62:162–165. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Cancer are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES