Table 3.
Class frequency threshold (%) | TP309_PXO99 versus TP309_Mock | Xa21_PXO99 versus Xa21_Mock | Xa21_PXO99ΔraxST versus Xa21_Mock |
---|---|---|---|
GC/TOF 100 | 53 (15) | 39 (25) | 65 (42) |
GC/TOF 75 | 71 (21) | 53 (29) | 92 (59) |
GC/TOF 50 | 96 (25) | 71 (37) | 125 (85) |
LC/TOF (+) 100 | 35 (5) | 44 (15) | 38 (10) |
LC/TOF (+) 75 | 55 (9) | 73 (21) | 62 (20) |
LC/TOF (+) 50 | 68 (11) | 106 (31) | 92 (26) |
LC/TOF (−) 100 | 17 (1) | 30 (5) | 31 (10) |
LC/TOF (−) 75 | 21 (1) | 57 (9) | 64 (25) |
LC/TOF (−) 50 | 21 (1) | 83 (12) | 90 (31) |
The number of differential peaks or features at greater than 2-fold change is shown for various comparisons with decreasing class frequency thresholds for peak (GC/TOF) or feature (LC/TOF) detections. Parentheses indicate the number of compounds having both greater than 2-fold change and P < 0.05