Skip to main content
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
letter
. 2008 Aug 1;33(2):583. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0631-y

Comment on Mouzopoulos et al.: The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options

Nataraj AR 1,, Deepak Singhal 1, Chandrashekar Yadav 1, Vijay Sharma 1
PMCID: PMC2899079  PMID: 18670774

We congratulate Mouzopoulos et al. [1] on their excellent study and efforts to solve the controversies in the management of displaced fracture of the femoral neck in an elderly age group. We agree with the authors that total hip arthroplasty (THA) is cost effective and has a better functional outcome in elderly patients with subcapital femoral neck fracture, but we would like to have some clarifications of their study with respect to the following points:

  1. Rate of dislocation in their study, as many studies show high dislocation rates of approximately 10–25% in THA for acute femoral neck fractures [2].

  2. Type of implant used (cemented or uncemented THA), as cemented THA is associated with high mortality and uncemented THA needs prolonged non-weight-bearing mobilisation [3].

  3. Approach used (posterior, anterior or lateral), as Sikorski and Barrington [4] reported a lower mortality rate with an anterior approach and Woo and Morrey [5] reported a lower dislocation rate with an anterolateral approach.

  4. Other complications (like infection, blood loss, duration of surgery), as all these are more common with THA [6].

We would like to add that if the authors had clarified the above points then they could have come to a justified conclusion regarding mortality and dislocation. This article may become one of the landmark studies, as to this day controversy still exists regarding the ideal choice of prosthesis and surgery for elderly patients with displaced fracture of the femoral neck.

References

  • 1.Mouzopoulos G, Stamatakos M, Arabatzi H, et al. The four-year functional result after a displaced subcapital hip fracture treated with three different surgical options. Int Orthop. 2008;32:367–373. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0321-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schmidt AH, Asnis SE, Haidukewych G, et al. Femoral neck fractures. Instr Course Lect. 2005;54:417–445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Parvizi J, Holiday AD, Ereth MH, et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Sudden death during primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:39–48. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sikorski JM, Barrington R. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for the displaced subcapital fracture of the femur. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B:357–361. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.63B3.7263746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295–1306. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, et al. Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1673–1681. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200309000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES