Skip to main content
International Orthopaedics logoLink to International Orthopaedics
. 2008 Mar 7;33(1):89–93. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0525-z

Vascularised iliac graft as a method of acetabular augmentation in subluxed hip in adolescents

Federico Fernandez-Palazzi 1,, Horacio Caviglia 2, Daniel Comando 2, Daniel Vizona dalla Posta 3, Nestor Vallejos 3
PMCID: PMC2899244  PMID: 18324403

Abstract

This article presents the clinical experience of patients with a dysplasic subluxated hip treated with the same procedure involving a vascularised graft of iliac crest by sartorius muscle. This study was performed in three different centres, in two different countries, and in 31 patients with 37 hips (9 bilateral). All patients were clinically evaluated according to the Merle d Aubigne scale and radiological measuring of acetabular coverage, Sharp angle, and CE angle. Walking ability preoperatively was 4.87 and postoperatively 5.12, which was not statistically significant. Preoperative inclination acetabular angle was 59.0° ± 6.23 and postoperatively 37.5° ± 6.08 (P < 0.00001). Preoperative CE angle was −2.03° ± 13.5 and postoperatively was 41.0 ° ± 12.3 ( P < 0.00001). Index head acetabulum had a preoperative coverage of 48.3% ± 13.0 and postoperatively 100.8% ± 19.5. The head sphericity did not show any statistically significant difference in relation to the results. The results obtained were satisfactory from every point of view, making this the procedure of choice in the armamentarium to delay the need for a total joint as treatment of early osteoarthritis in young adults.

Introduction

The dysplasic subluxed hip in young adults is still a subject of controversy. Many young patients that develop a hip osteoathrosis present some mechanical anormalities around the acetabulum or proximal femur [2]. The subluxed hip with partial contact with the acetabulum leads to alterations in weight bearing and concentrates stress in a small area of articular cartilage, leading to a degeneration of the cartilage and an early degenerative arthritis in early youth with marked alterations.

Many authors have demonstrated that young adult patients with a CE angle (hip centre edge angle) less than 16 degrees have a high risk of degenerative arthritis, specially when subluxation is present [13]. In many mechanically compromised hips, the factor that limits the treatment outcome is the amount of cartilage damage that has occurred before treatment [14].

Osteotomies modify the hip joint position, thus trying to avoid the progression of cartilage degeneration and its eventual reparation. This can be done either by a diminution of the force that the joint has to support or by enlarging the surface of the joint to improve the distribution of forces. When a congruent acetabulum can be redirected over the femoral head, a reconstructive osteotomy (periacetabular) should be used since the periacetabular osteotomy is the ideal method, especially for developmental hip dysplasia, allowing great movement at the acetabular level. The AP abduction–internal rotation view demonstrates the articular congruency and simulates the corrected joint position of a typical lateral and anterior coverage enhancing rotational osteotomy [7]. The persistence of fixed subluxation on this view is a contraindication to a rotational pelvic osteotomy. The presence of an incongruent acetabulum is a contraindication to a periacetabular osteotomy and is an indication for a pelvic salvage osteotomy, such as acetabular augmentation with a vascularised graft. Fawzy et al. [4], after studying 76 hips with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia treated by acetabular augmentation and reviewed for 11 years, found a survival analysis using conversion to total hip of 86% at 5 years and 46% at 10 years. Where there was none or slight narrowing of joint space, survival was of 97% at 5 years and 75% at 10 years, versus 76% at 5 years and 22% at 10 years when moderate or severe narrowing of the joint space was present. They concluded that shelf acetabuloplasty is a reliable and safe procedure giving medium term symptomatic relief for adults with acetabular dysplasia, with best results in cases of mild and moderate dysplasia with little arthritis.

Salvage procedures support the femoral head by providing a buttress superior to the hip capsule. With time this capsular tissue undergoes a metaplasia to a fibro cartilage, which is of course not comparable to hyaline cartilage. Thus the acetabular augmentation with a vascularised graft has a different indication to the rotational acetabular osteotomies. The vascularised iliac graft contains viable osteogenic cells, more in medullar than in cortical bone, and the fact of being vascularised, theoretically facilitates its incorporation to bone. Experimental work by Domagoj et al. [3] on ten cadavers showed that in obtaining a pediculated iliac graft, the deep circumflex artery was long enough as to allow transfer of the graft without requiring any microvascular anastomosis. They conclude that in all cadavers the length of the pedicle was sufficient to reach any position in the acetabular roof and thus provide good primary stability, local bone remodelling, and incorporation under load.

Using a vascularised iliac crest graft with the Sartorius muscle we obtained an enlargement of the weight bearing surface. The vascularised graft does not compete with indications for re-orientation osteotomies. The indications are still painful incongruent hips when a reorientation is not possible. Our experience with nonvascularised graft is that Wilson or Stahelli types of graft reabsorb in the long-term follow-up about 40% totally and 80% partially, whereas we have not had bone reabsorption of our vascularised graft.

Before a total joint is considered in these young patients, many surgical procedures of osteotomies at the iliac or femoral level have been used. This article describes our experience with a new technique consisting of an augmentation of the superior and anterior margins of the acetabulum by a vascularised graft of the iliac crest based on the sartorius muscle.

Material and method

This study reviewed 31 patients with one or both hips subluxated, for a total of 37 hips, with a CE angle less than 16 degrees and all experiencing pain.

Patient hip details include:

  • Six bilateral hips

  • 17 right and 20 left hips

  • 11 males and 20 females

  • Mean age was 19 years ranging from 8 to 38 years

  • Mean follow-up was 8 years ranging from 6 to 12 years

Diagnoses were:

  • 24 dysplasic hips

  • Six Perthes sequelae

  • Five

    septic arthritis sequelae

  • Two cerebral palsy

All patients were classified according to Merle d’Aubigne score to evaluate pain, mobility, and walking ability [6]. Preoperative pain was 4.06, mobility 5.73, and walking ability 4.87. All patients were studied radiographically [1, 5, 811, 14], measuring acetabular coverage, Sharp angle [13], and CE angle [12, 13]. Seven cases had had a previous surgical procedure performed. The presence of osteoarthritis allows them to be classified according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [9] (Table 1).

Table 1.

Classification of osteoathrosis according to the Japanese Orthopaedic Association

Stage Criteria
Pre-arthrosis Acetabular dysplasia without other signs
Early Slight diminution joint line. Abnormal subchondral sclerosis
Advanced Great diminution joint line. With or without sclerosis and/or cysts
Terminal Obliteration joint space

Twelve cases were in the prearthritic stage, 17 in early stages, and eight in the advanced stage. The angle of acetabular inclination was measured preoperatively and found to be 59.0° ± 6.23 [8]. Acetabular head relationship measured in relation to CE angle [13] and the head acetabular index was 8.9, while the CE angle measurement had a mean of −2.03 ± 13.5. The head acetabulum relationship [5]—normally between 70–100%, usually 90%—had a coverage of 48.3% ± 13.0.

At the femoral level we measured the head concentricity, drawing two lines 90 degrees to one another from the maximum arch border of head circumference. When the difference was less than 1.1 cm it was considered spherical [12]. The head concentricity was evaluated measuring the major and minor axes in an AP radiograph. Results with more than 1.1 cm difference dividing the major axis by the minor axis are considered deformed heads. In 15 hips the head was spherical and in 22 nonspherical.

All patients had a bone scintogram with 99 Tc (99 Technetium) pre- and postoperatively. The bone scan was repeated at 24 hours after administration of isotope. In the preoperative stage it was performed to assess the weight that was acting on the joint, and then was repeated at least 1 year after surgery showing a better distribution of weight forces and good vascular support to the graft.

Surgical technique

The surgical procedure was conducted as follows:

  1. A hockey stick incision was made with short arm on the iliac crest and straight arm going distally from the anterior superior iliac spine in the direction of the border of the patella.

  2. The lateral cutaneous nerve was identified and protected.

  3. The sartrorius muscle was dissected.

  4. A graft of iliac crest with the attachment of the sartorius muscle was freed and separated (Fig. 1).

  5. A portion of the superior border of the external surface of iliac bone was scarified extrarticularly.

  6. The graft was located extra capsularly and fixed by means of two screws, giving a correct coverage both superiorly and anteriorly (Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5).

  7. Muscles of the iliac crest are reattached.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Iliac crest resection site, down to the anterior superior iliac spine, continued by the sartorius muscle

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Position of the uncovered head of the femur

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Position of vascularised graft on finishing the procedure

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Anteroposterior postoperative X-rays. Observe the coverage obtained by the graft and the fixation by two screws

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Axial X-rays postoperatory. Observe the anterior augmentation of the acetabulum

Rehabilitation was started with active movements of the joint at 24 hours postoperation and weight bearing allowed at 3 months.

The continuous data giving an abnormal distribution were processed by the nonparametric method of Kraus Kal Wallis for independent groups. In the difference pre- and postoperatory the method of Wilcoxon and the Student t test were used. In all cases the significance value was P≤0.5 for two extremes. The distribution of data is expressed as arithmetic media ± standard deviation.

Results

Evaluation according to Merle d’ Aubigne provided the following data:

  • Preoperative pain was 4.06 ± 0.68

  • Postoperative pain was 5.43 ± 0.65 (P < 0.0001)

  • Preoperative mobility was 4.73

  • Postoperative mobility was 4.92 (nonstatistically significant)

All patients presented a diminution of hip flexion in the immediate postoperative evaluation which recovered after 6 months of physical therapy. Walking ability preoperatively was 4.87 and postoperatively 5.12, which was not statistically significant. Mean age of the 12 patients in the prearthrosis stage was 12.7 ± 3.14 years, in the 17 cases of early lesion stage 21.8 ± 6.00, and in the eight cases of advanced stage it was 25.9 ± 7.22 (P < 0.0002). Preoperative inclination acetabular angle was 59.0° ± 6.23 and postoperatively 37.5° ± 6.08 (P < 0.00001). Preoperative CE angle was −2.03° ± 13.5 and postoperatively was 41.0° ± 12.3 (P < 0.00001). The head acetabulum index had a preoperative coverage of 48.3% ± 13.0 and postoperatively of 100.8 % ± 19.5. Head sphericity did not show any statistically significant differences.

Technetium 99 bone scintogram, as an index of joint stress, was positive in all patients. In the postoperative stage it was used in order to show the vascularisation of the graft. Comparing pain and coverage, we observed that when the patients had coverage less than 34%, the pain was more intense (P < 0.036). Comparing age and type of preoperative pain, we observed that in patients older than 20 years pain was more severe (P < 0.044). Two patients had postoperative lateral cutaneous nerve paraesthesae, and another had a fracture of the screw fixing the graft, not affecting the outcome.

Discussion

The iliac crest graft vascularised by the sartorius muscle provides an acetabular coverage, both superiorly and laterally, augmenting the articular surface in order to obtain a better distribution of weight bearing. None of our cases exhibited any reabsorption of the graft, and angiographic studies showed that vascularisation of the graft was maintained at follow-up.

All our patients had subluxed hips with a CE angle <16°, which is considered an at risk group to develop degenerative arthrosis. The early signs appeared in the mean age group of 21.8 years and the advanced lesion in 25.9 years. The more intense pain was also observed in patients older than 20 years. These data suggest that the ideal moment for treatment is in patients younger than those above.

The percentage of head subluxation also showed a relation with the intensity of pain, showing that in patients with coverage less than 34%, the pain was more intense. Clinical evaluation showed that the most marked benefit of this operation was related to pain. Patients had a diminution of hip flexion in the immediate postoperative phase, which was probably due to the loss of the flexion action of the sartorius used for graft vascularisation. This mobility was regained in the first 6 months after operation, with a plan of rehabilitation, due to compensation from the other hip flexion.

The graft provides an adequate coverage demonstrated by the CE angle, Sharp angle, and the percentage of coverage obtained. The size of the graft makes the obtained coverage bigger, and in some cases, covers the entire femoral head.

The vascularity of the graft is provided through the sartorius muscle. One patient had a pelvic pathology nonrelated to the hip that required a digital angiography. Such a study allowed us to observe the circulation to the iliac graft through the sartorius muscle as shown in the Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Postoperative angiography. Observe the vascularisation of the graft

The graft is stabilised and fixed by two screws, allowing early active rehabilitation (Figs. 4 and 5). In no case did we had a graft reabsorption. One patient had a fracture of the screw, but did not require additional surgery. The fatigue of the material was probably due to the continuous weight bearing acting on the graft

The postoperative paraesthesiae of the lateral cutaneous nerve, present in two patients, were due to the manipulation required on obtaining the graft and the anatomical variations at this level.

Footnotes

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0754-9

References

  • 1.Anwar M, Sugano N, Matsui M, Takaoka K, Ono K. Dome osteotomy of the pelvis for osteoarthritis secondary to hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993;75B:222–227. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.75B2.8444941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cooperman I. Acetabular dysplasia in the adult. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1983;175:79–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Domagoj D, Nicola A, Klobua H, Pecina M. Acetabular roof reconstruction with pedicled iliac graft. Int Orthop. 2002;26:344–348. doi: 10.1007/s00264-002-0381-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fawzy E, Mandellos G, Steiger R, McLardy-Smith P, Benson MKD, Murray D. Journal Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(B):1197–1202. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B9.15884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heyman CH, Herndon CH. Legg-Perthes disease. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1950;32A:767–768. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Merle d’ Aubigne R, Pastel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg. 1954;36-A:451–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Santore R, Turgeon T, Philips W, Kantor S. Pelvic and femoral osteotomy in the treatment of the hip disease in the young adult. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:131–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Surg (Br) 1961;43-B:268–272. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shina Y (1970) Standard for evaluation of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Orthop Assoc 44:appendix (in Japanese)
  • 10.Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ. The natural history of congenital disease of the hip. JBJS. 1979;61B(3):334–338. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.61B3.158025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Weinstein SL. Natural history of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) and hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1987;225:62–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wiberg G. Studies on dysplasic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;83(suppl 58):1–135. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wiberg G (1939) Studies on dysplasic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand 83(Suppl 58)
  • 14.Yuong Jo K, Ganz R, Murphy S, Buly R, Millim M. Hip joint preserving surgery: beyond the classic osteotomy. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:145–158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES