Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 1998 Jan 22;1(3):95–99. doi: 10.1186/cc111

The use of cephalad cannulae to monitor jugular venous oxygen content during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Robert Pettignano 1, Michele Labuz 2, Theresa W Gauthier 3, Jeryl Huckaby 2, Reese H Clark 3
PMCID: PMC28993  PMID: 11056701

Abstract

Background:

When used during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), jugular venous bulb catheters, known as cephalad cannulae, increase venous drainage, augment circuit flow and decompress cerebral venous pressure. Optimized cerebral oxygen delivery during ECMO may contribute to a reduction in neurological morbidity. This study describes the use of cephalad cannulae and identifies rudimentary data for jugular venous oxygen saturation (JVO2) and arterial to jugular venous oxygen saturation difference (AVDO2) in this patient population.

Results:

Patients on venoarterial (VA) ECMO displayed higher JVO2 (P < 0.01) and lower AVDO2 (P = 0.01) than patients on venovenous (VV) ECMO (P < 0.01). During VV ECMO, JVO2 was higher and AVDO2 lower when systemic pH was < 7.35 rather than > 7.4 (P = 0.01). During VA ECMO, similar differences in AVDO2 but not in JVO2 were observed at different pH levels (P = 0.01).

Conclusions:

Jugular venous saturation and AVDO2 were influenced by systemic pH, ECMO type and patient age. These data provide the foundation for normative values of JVO2 and AVDO2 in neonates and children treated with ECMO.

Keywords: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, venovenous ECMO, venoarterial ECMO, cephalad cannulae, jugular venous oxygen content

Introduction

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to treat newborn infants and children experiencing life-threatening cardiorespiratory failure unresponsive to conventional medical therapy [1,2]. Infants meeting the required criteria are estimated to have 80% mortality if they do not receive ECMO compared to approximately 80% survival for those who do receive the treatment [3]. This survival is not without significant cost and morbidity [2]. Substantial investigative interest has focused on the neurological outcome of patients treated with ECMO. Optimized cerebral oxygen delivery during ECMO may limit neurological morbidity associated with hypoxia.

Monitoring jugular venous oxygen saturation (JVO2) as a method of approximating global cerebral oxygenation via a jugular venous bulb drainage catheter is a safe and reliable method in both adults and children [4,5], including neonates [6,7]. Jugular venous oximetry is used in the management of patients with increased intracranial pressure [8,9,10,11], as well as intra-operatively during cardiopulmonary bypass [12] and during neurosurgical procedures [13]. Jugular venous sampling enables calculation of arterial to jugular venous oxygen saturation difference (AVDO2) for more precise monitoring of cerebral oxygen content and to aid in the assurance of adequate oxygen delivery [14, 15].

When used during ECMO, jugular venous bulb catheters, also known as cephalad cannulae, increase venous drainage, augment circuit flow, and decompress cerebral venous circulation. Currently there are insufficient data available to clarify the results of samples obtained from cephalad cannulae used as monitoring tools during ECMO. The purpose of this study was to describe the use of cephalad cannulae and the data obtained from jugular venous blood samples as an additional tool in the management of the ECMO patient. Our goal was to identify rudimentary data that would be foundation for normative data for JVO2 and AVDO2 in this population of patients.

Materials and methods

Data collection

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the medical records of all the patients treated with ECMO in whom a cephalad cannula was placed. Data collected included vital signs, arterial blood gases, jugular venous blood gases, ECMO flow rate, as well as the type of ECMO used. These data were recorded every 8 h at the time of jugular venous blood sampling as per our ECMO protocol. Patient data were compared using the following categories: neonatal, pediatric, and the type of ECMO utilized [venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV)].

ECMO procedure

Cephalad cannulae are inserted via an arterial catheter into the jugular vein. The size of the catheter is based on patient weight and blood vessel diameter. In neonates this is most commonly a catheter between 10 and 14 F. In pediatric patients, the same size or one size smaller than the venous drainage catheter is used. The catheter is then advanced in a retrograde fashion into the jugular vein until resistance is met. Optimal cannula flow is considered to be between one-third and one-half of total ECMO flow. The insertion of the cephalad catheter is performed at the time of ECMO cannulation.

All neonates unergoing ECMO received sedation with morphine and lorazepam without neuromuscular blockade. Pediatric patients routinely received sedation with an opioid (fentanyl or morphine) and a benzodiazepine (midazolam or lorazepam). Neuromuscular blockade was achieved in the pediatric patients with either vecuronium or atracurium.

Measurements

Arteriovenous oxygen content differece was calculated using the formula:

AVDO2 = arterial oxygen content (CaO2) - venous oxygen content (CVO2)

where CaO2 (vol%) = [hemoglobin × arterial saturation (%) × 1.36] + [arterial PO2 × 0.0031] and CVO2 (vol%) = [hemoglobin × venous saturation (%) × 1.36 ] + [venous PO2 × 0.0031].

Systemic venous saturation (SVO2) was not measured since recirculation and return of ECMO derived oxygenated blood into the venous circulaton with VV ECMO would render this measurement inaccurate.

Data analysis

All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data analyses of changes in JVO2 or AVDO2 over time were performed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures. Analyses of data between groups and under different clinical conditions were performed utilizing ANOVA with post hoc analysis using Fisher's test of least squares. Linear and non-linear correlation analysis was used to determine any correlation between physiologic parameters, ECMO flow, and JVO2 or AVDO2. Probabilities of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Patient population

Forty-seven patients were studied including 36 neonates and 11 pediatric patients. The demographic characteristics of the patient population are described in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic data

Neonatal Pediatric
Total in Group
 VV with ceph 31 7
 VA with ceph 5 4
 Total 36 11
Weight 2.5-4.7 kg 2.7-61 kg
Age 5-168 h 3 months-16 years
Sex
 Male 25 7
 Female 11 4

VV = venovenous, VA = venoarterial, ceph = cephalad drain.

Three patients were removed from the study due to malfunction of the cephalad cannulae or incomplete data collection. Three hundred and eight measurements were reviewed. Neonatal ECMO patients carried a mortality of 11%, while the mortality of pediatric ECMO patients was 18%. Both pediatric deaths occurred in patients with underlying cardiac anomalies. The diagnoses of all patients are shown in Table 2.

Table 2.

Diagnoses

VV VA Total
Neonatal Meconium aspiration 12 1 13
Sepsis 4 0 4
Persistent pulmonary hypertension 8 1 9
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia 3 2 5
Lung hypoplasis 2 0 2
Respiratory distress syndrome 2 1 3
Pediatric Acute respiratory distress syndrome 3 0 3
Near drowning 1 0 1
Myocarditis 1 1 2
Asthma 2 0 2
Necrotizing tracheitis 0 1 1
Respiratory syncytial virus 0 1 1
Pneumonitis 0 1 1

W = venovenous; VA = venoarterial.

Monitoring

Demographic data collected included name, age, diagnosis and weight. Blood gas results were collected every 8 h for the first 3 days of the ECMO run, and included patient arterial (postductal in neonates), cephalad venous, pre-membrane venous and post-membrane measurements. Vital signs and ECMO flow were also collected to coincide with the time of blood gas analysis.

There was no correlation between JVO2 and mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, PaO2, PaCO2, peripheral saturation or ECMO flow. Similarly, there was no correlation between these parameters and AVDO2. The above mentioned clinical parameters were maintained within a normal range during the ECMO run. The number of values obtained at extremes was small.

Mean JVO2 and AVDO2 changed over the course of the ECMO run in patients treated with VV ECMO, but not in patients treated with VA ECMO. Patients on VA ECMO had higher JVO2 (P < 0.01) and lower AVDO2 (P = 0.01) than patients on VV ECMO. Neonates had lower JVO2 and higher AVDO2 than pediatric patients. When the type of ECMO was considered, neonates on VA ECMO had lower JVO2 and higher AVDO2 than pediatric patients on VA ECMO. Neonates on VV ECMO had higher AVDO2 than pediatric patients, but JVO2 was similar. Multivariate analysis showed that the type of ECMO was more important than the patient's age group in determining both AVDO2 and JVO2.

During VV ECMO, JVO2 was higher and AVDO2 was lower when the systemic pH was < 7.35 than when the pH was >7.4. During VA ECMO, similar difference in AVDO2, but not in JVO2, were observed at different pH levels (P = 0.01).

There were no complications (ie increased bleeding, venous thrombosis, infection or limitation of ECMO flow) due to the cephalad cannulae. Clotting of the cephalad cannula necessitated its removal in four out of 47 cases (8.5%). Clots were identified by visual inspection and/or blood flow decreasing to less than 50 cm3/min as measured by a transit time flowmeter (Transonic Systems Inc, Ithica, NY, USA). Clotted catheters were identified and removed at 5, 10, 120 and 254 h of ECMO. The remaining catheters were removed at the end of ECMO therapy. All catheters were removed without incident. No morbidity was suffered by any patient who had their cephalad cannula removed due to clot identification or decreased flow. There were no reported incidents of intracranial hemorrhage in any of the patients with cephalad catheters. Long-term neurologic follow-up was unavailable due to the retrospective nature of our patients who are referrals from other institutions, specifically sent for ECMO, then returned to the referral area once support is terminated.

Discussion

Patients requiring ECMO have experienced varying degrees of hypoxia, hypotension, and acidosis [1]. Clinical and laboratory data suggest that severe hypoxia, similar to that occurring in patients requiring ECMO, alters cerebral autoregulation [16,17,18]. These studies demonstrate significant cerebral hyperemia, characterized by increased volume and velocity of cerebral blood flow after severe hypoxia [19]. The initiation of ECMO also alters cerebral autoregulation in healthy animals [20,21]. In neonates, initiation of VA ECMO causes an increase in cerebral blood flow [22,23]. A better understanding of cerebral oxygen consumption and delivery during ECMO may improve the quality of care that we provide for these patients. Neurological morbidity associated with hypoxia and reperfusion injury may therein be reduced.

Our study demonstrates that, within the normal ranges of mean arterial blood pressure, arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide content, JVO2 and AVDO2 were consistent over time. In addition, changes in ECMO pump flow were not correlated with changes in JVO2 or AVDO2. Although it has been suggested that cerebral blood flow is altered during ECMO [20,21,22,23], our data imply that cerebral autoregulation may remain intact. In the future, directly monitoring cerebral blood flow may provide the data needed to address this question. Several factors were found to be associated with lower JVO2 and higher AVDO2. During VV ECMO, there was an initial drop in JVO2 with a corresponding rise in AVDO2, followed by stabilization of both. The changes were most marked during the first 24 h of ECMO, with stabilization occurring after 32 h. SVO2 was not measurable and/or inaccurate because of the delivery of oxygenated blood directly into the venous circulation and due to the effects of recirculation on the measurement of SVO2.

In contrast, there were no changes over time in JVO2 or AVDO2 in patients treated with VA ECMO. However, the number of patients in this group is small and it is possible that with a larger population a difference would be seen. Throughout their course, patients on VA ECMO had higher JVO2 and lower AVDO2 than patients on VV ECMO. Similarly, pediatric patients had higher JVO2 and lower AVDO2 than neonates.

The precise cause of the time-related changes during VV ECMO are unclear. The differences in JVO2 and AVDO2 between VV and VA ECMO are most likely due to varying oxygen delivery to the brain. During VA ECMO, oxygenated blood from the ECMO circuit is delivered into the ascending aorta immediately adjacent to the left common carotid artery. As a result, blood entering the left common carotid is completely saturated. During VV ECMO, oxygenated blood is returned to the patient's venous blood near the right atrium. As blood from the ECMO circuit reaches the common carotid artery it is well mixed with the patient's venous blood and is not completely saturated. The potential contribution of this increased oxygen delivery to cerebral reperfusion injury following hypoxia/ischemia in patients undergoing VA ECMO is unknown.

The cause of the difference identified between neonates and pediatric patients is less clear. Our data suggest that JVO2 and AVDO2 are different in neonates and pediatric patients. There are two possible reasons for this finding. The clinical use of neuromuscular blockade and sedation in our neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) compared to our pediatric ICUs is different. Neonates are not routinely paralyzed and receive less sedation than pediatric patients who are routinely paralyzed and heavily sedated. This may be reflected in an increased oxygen consumption in the neonates giving them a higher AVDO2 level than the pediatric patients. secondly, the global oxygen consumption of a neonate may be higher than that of an older child due to age alone. The significance and implications of the relatively higher JVO2 associated with both the VA ECMO and pediatric ECMO groups is unclear and will require further study.

Changes in systemic pH were also associated with changes in JVO2 and AVDO2. We did not find a relationship between PaCO2 and JVO2 or AVDO2; however, PaCO2 was clinically maintained in a normal range. Cain has demonstrated that, in passively hyperventilated dogs, as pH decreases oxygen consumption also decreases [24]. This may be the explanation for AVDO2 decreasing with pH in our patients. Alkalosis is a well-recognized stimulus for cerebral vasoconstriction [25]. Unfortunately, there are on data that define the optimum pH at which oxygen delivery to the brain is adequate. Conversely, excess or 'luxury' flow [26] may cause cerebral reperfusion injury associated with hypoxic insults. Our data do not allow us to define an optimal range for pH, but they do suggest that small changes in pH affect cerebral blood flow in neonatal and pediatric patients on both VV and VA ECMO.

Summary

In our study population the use of cephalad cannulae was without complications and was useful in the management of the ECMO patient. Cephalad cannulae can provide accurate, consistent readings of JVO2 during the course of ECMO. Placement of cephalad cannulae at the initiation of ECMO was without adverse effects. We identified several factors that may influence oxygen delivery to the brain during ECMO, including systemic pH, type of ECMO and age of the patient. Future studies should attempt to define optimal oxygen delivery to the brain. This study provides a foundation of normative values for cephalad monitoring in neonates and pediatric patients on ECMO. Additional investigation is required to delineate the role cephalad catheters may play in the clinical monitoring, bedside management and long-term outcome of patients on ECMO. The use of cerebral biochemical Markers taken from jugular venous catheters may help to predict neurodevelopmental outcome in this patient population [27].

References

  1. Short BL, Miller MK, Anderson KD. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the management of respiratory failure in the newborn. . Clin Perinatol. 1987;14:737–748. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Stolar CJH, Snedecor SM, Bartlett RH. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and neonatal respiratory failure: experience from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization. J Pediatr Surg. 1991;26:563–571. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(91)90708-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ECMO Data Registry Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan, 1994.
  4. Andrews PJD, Dearden NM, Miller JD. Jugular bulb cannulation: description of a cannulation technique and validation of a new continuous monitor. Br J Anesth. 1991;67:553–558. doi: 10.1093/bja/67.5.553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goetting MG, Preston G. Jugular bulb catheterization does not increase intracranial pressure. Intensive Care Med. 1991;17:195–198. doi: 10.1007/BF01709876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goetting MG, Preston G. Jugular bulb catheterization: experience with 123 patients. Crit Care Med. 1990;18:1220–1223. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199011000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gayle MO, Frewen TC, Armstrong RF, et al. Jugular venous bulb catheterization in infants and children. Crit Care Med. 1989;17:385–388. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198905000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan K-H, Dearden NM, Miller JD, Andrews PJD, Midgley S. Multimodality monitoring as a guide to treatment of intracranial hypertension after severe brain injury. Neurosurg. 1993;32:547–553. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199304000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sheinberg M, Kanter MJ, Robertson CS, Contant CF, Narayan RK, Grossman RG. Continuous monitoring of Jugular venous oxygen saturation in head-injured patients. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:212–217. doi: 10.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cruz J, Miner ME, Allen SJ, Alves WM, Gennarelli TA. Continuous monitoring of cerebral oxygenation in acute brain injury: injection of mannitol during hyperventilation. J Neurosurg. 1990;73:725–730. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.5.0725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jaggi JL, Obrist WD, Gennarelli TA, Langfitt TW. Relationship of early cerebral blood flow and metabolism to outcome in acute head injury. J Neurosurg. 1990;72:176–182. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.2.0176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakajima T, Kuro M, Hayashi Y, Kitaguchi K, Uchida O, Takaki O. Clinical evaluation of cerebral oxygen balance during cardiopulmonary bypass: on-line continuous monitoring of jugular venous oxyhemoglobin saturation. Anesth Analg. 1992;74:630–635. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199205000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Matta BF, Lam AM, Mayberg TS, Shapira Y, Winn HR. A critique of the intraoperative use of jugular venous bulb catheters during neurosurgical procedures. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:745–750. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199410000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jaggi JL, Cruz J, Gennarelli TA. Estimated cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen in severely brain-injured patients: a valuable tool for clinical monitoring. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:66–70. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199501000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cruz J, Raps EC, Hoffstad OJ, Jaggi JL, Gennarelli TA. Cerebral oxygen monitoring. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:1242–1246. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199308000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Short BL, Bender K, Walker LK, Traystman RJ. The cerebrovascular response to prolonged hypoxia with carotid artery and jugular vein ligation in the newborn lamb. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:887–891. doi: 10.1016/0022-3468(94)90009-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Short BL, Walker LK, Traystman RJ. Impaired cerebral autoregulation in the newborn lamb during recovery from severe, prolonged hypoxia, combined with carotid artery and jugular vein ligation. Crit Care Med. 1994;22:1262–1268. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199408000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tweed A, Cote J, Lou H, Grewgory G, Wade J. Impairment of cerebral blood flow autoregulation in the newborn lamb by hypoxia. Pediatr Res. 1986;20:516–519. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198606000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Stolar CJH, Reyes C. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation causes significant changes in intracranial pressure and carotid artery blood flow in newborn lambs. J Pediatr Surg. 1988;23:1163–1168. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(88)80334-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Short BL, Walker LK, Bender KS, Traystman RJ. Impairment of cerebral autoregulation during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in newborn lambs. Pediatr Res. 1993;33:289–294. doi: 10.1203/00006450-199303000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosenberg AA, Kinsella JP. Effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on cerebral hemodynamics in newborn lambs. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:1575–1581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taylor GA, Catena LM, Garin DB, Miller MK, Short BL. Intracranial flow patterns in infants undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: preliminary observations with Doppler US. Radiology . 1987;165:671–674. doi: 10.1148/radiology.165.3.2961003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liem KD, Hopman JCW, Oeseburg B, de Haan AFJ, Festen C, Kolle'e LAA. Cerebral oxygenation and hemodynamics during induction of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as investigated by near infrared spectrophotometry. Pediatrics. 1995;95:555–561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cain SM. Increased oxygen uptake with passive hyperventilation of dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1970;28:4–7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1970.28.1.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gleason CA, Short BL, Jones MD., Jr Cerebral blood flow and metabolism during and after prolonged hypocapnia in new born lambs. J Pediatr. 1989;115:309–314. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80091-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Obrist WD, Langfitt TW, Jaggi JL, Cruz J, Gennarelli TA. Cerebral blood flow and metabolism in comatose patients with acute head injury. J Neurosurg. 1984;61:241–253. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.2.0241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Grayck EN, Meliones JN, Kern FH, Hansell DR, Ungerleider RM, Greeley WJ. Elevated serum lactate correlates with intracranial hemorrhage in neonates treated with extracorporeal life support. Pediatrics. 1995;96:914–917. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES