Skip to main content
AAPS PharmSciTech logoLink to AAPS PharmSciTech
. 2010 Mar 30;11(2):574–581. doi: 10.1208/s12249-010-9412-1

Preparation and Physicochemical Characterization of Amoxicillin β-cyclodextrin Complexes

Catherine Bisson-Boutelliez 1, Stephane Fontanay 1,2, Chantal Finance 1,2, Francine Kedzierewicz 1,2,
PMCID: PMC2902304  PMID: 20352533

Abstract

Amoxicillin (AMOX), a penicillin A, belongs to the β-lactam family It is usually the drug of choice within the class because it is better absorbed, following oral administration, than other β-lactam antibiotics. Its β-lactamase degradation might be prevented by using a molecular [AMOX:β-CD] complex. The aim of this work was to prepare complexes using two methods and then characterize interactions between AMOX and the native β-CD. The extent of complexation in solution has been evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and 2D rotating-frame Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (2D ROESY). Mass changes (TG), calorimetric effects (DSC), and mass spectrometry (MS) were determined on the same sample under identical conditions using the Skimmer coupling system. Skimmer and infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) were used to characterize the solid state of the binary system. Complexation of AMOX with β-CD was proven by FT-IR, NMR, DSC, and HPLC. The 2D ROESY spectra did not show any dipolar proton interaction of the AMOX with cyclodextrin. The 1:1 stoichiometry of the complex was obtained by HPLC. The stability constant for AMOX with β-CD was determined to be 1,878 M−1. In the [AMOX:β-CD] complex, the phenyl group is included inside the β-CD, and the ionized carboxyl group on the penam ring forms hydrogen bonds with the secondary hydroxyl groups of another β-CD to keep the complex stable. Preparation methods allowed exactly the same complex.

Key words: amoxicillin, complex, β-cyclodextrin, DSC-TG-SM, FT-IR, HPLC stability constant, NMR

INTRODUCTION

Amoxicillin (AMOX), a penicillin A, belongs to the β-lactam family and is often used for either prophylactic (1) or curative anti-biotherapy. Because of its wide spectrum, this antimicrobial agent is frequently used for the treatment of oral, digestive infections, and Lyme disease (24). Resistance of Gram-positive and -negative bacteria to β-lactam antibiotics is mostly associated with the production of β-lactamases and sometimes with decreased transport across the bacterial cell wall (59). Thus, aminopenicillins are used in combination with nitro-imidazole or clarithromycin, which may lead to an increase in the selection pressure on both pathogenic bacteria and other bacteria belonging to the commensal flora and may consequently induce the selection of multi-resistant strains (1012). It has been suggested that the degradation of AMOX might be prevented using a molecular complexation with β-cyclodextrin (β-CD), which might therefore represent an interesting alternative therapy.

Cyclodextrins belong to a family of three well-known, industrially produced, major cyclic oligosaccharides and several minor, rare ones. The three most used cyclodextrins are built up from six, seven, and eight glucopyranose units known as α-, β-, and γ-CD, respectively. Cyclodextrins can be represented as toroïds, with the larger and the smaller openings of the toroïd exposing to the solvent secondary and primary hydroxyl groups, respectively. The interior of the cavity is less hydrophilic than the aqueous environment and thus able to host other hydrophobic molecules. In contrast, the exterior of the cavity is hydrophilic (13).

They are potential candidates for drug carriers (1417) because of their ability to alter physicochemical and biological properties of guest molecules through the formulation of inclusion complexes. Natural cyclodextrins (α, β, and γ) have been widely used for complexation because of their principal advantages as drug carriers, namely the availability of cyclodextrins of different sizes, low toxicity, and low pharmacological activity and the protection of the included drug molecules from biodegradation. Recently, the existence of a specific transport system for cyclodextrins in the bacterial cell wall seems to have been revealed (cym transport system), initially evidenced in Klebsiella oxytoca (18,19). Apparently α- and β-cyclodextrins are taken up as intact entities via the components of this transport system; thus, the transport of antibiotics could be improved if they are complexed with cyclodextrin.

Considering the above, cyclodextrins may be important for the protection of the β-lactam molecule from biodegradation, with all reserve of host–guest complex formation. Rare examples of AMOX studies by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR) and some other works concerning ampicillin complexation are reported in the literature (2022).

The aim of the present study was to investigate an [AMOX:β-CD] complex in order to explore more deeply the physicochemical interactions between AMOX and β-cyclodextrin. The extent of complexation in solution has been evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and NMR. Infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), thermogravimetry (TG), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) were used to characterize the solid state of all binary systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Amoxicillin anhydride (AMOX) is the 6-[D(−)-αamino-phydroxyphenyl acetamido] penicillanic acid (Fig. 1) (23). It was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. (Saint Quentin Fallavier, France) and used as received. The native β-CD was given by Wacker-Chemie GmbH (Lyon, France). The deuterium oxide (D2O, deuterium content 99.9%) was purchased from Eurisotop (Gif-sur-Yvette, France). All solutions were prepared using deionized water. Other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade or HPLC grade and were used as received.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Amoxicillin

Methods

Preparation of the Complexes

The [AMOX:β-CD] complexes were obtained according to the conditions described by Higuchi and Connors (24). AMOX and β-CD molecules were dissolved in deionized water at different molar ratios: [AMOX:β-CD], 1:0.25, 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:3, 1:5, with a final pH of 5. The solutions were:

  • In method 1, equilibrated for 24 h at 37°C under stirring at 250 rpm with a Certomat®M apparatus (B. Braun Biotech, Plaisance du Touch, France)

  • In method 2, sonicated for 20 min before equilibration 24 h at 37°C under stirring at 250 rpm

In the two cases, solutions were then freeze-dried before the experiments.

Complex Characterisation

Fourier Transform Infrared

FT-IR spectra were obtained with a Bruker Vector 22 spectrophotometer (Wissembourg, France). They were registered in potassium bromide pellets (1%, w/w) between 4,000 and 450 cm−1.

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

β-CD and AMOX powders were dissolved in deuterated water or deuterium oxide (D2O) at the different molar ratios. 1H-NMR spectroscopic experiments were performed at 300 K on a Bruker DRX-400 spectrophotometer (Wissembourg, France). Induced changes in the chemical shifts for AMOX (Δδ) by complexation were calculated using the following equation:

graphic file with name M1.gif 1

Spatial connectivity between cyclodextrin and drug was established by rotating-frame Overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (2D ROESY) experiments. Spectra were acquired with number of scans = 32, number of dummy scans = 16, recycle delay = 1.5 s, acquisition size 1k × 512, processing size 2k × 2k, and mixing time 400 ms (25).

Thermogravimetry, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, and Mass Spectrometry

Mass changes (TG), calorimetric effects (DSC), and MS were determined on the same sample under identical conditions using the Skimmer Coupling System (Netzsch, Gerätebau, Germany). This system combines the simultaneous thermal analysis instruments (STA 409C) for TG and DSC and quadrupole mass spectrometer for detection and analysis of the reaction gases. All instruments were calibrated before use.

The thermal behavior was studied by heating 5 mg of the sample in an aluminum open crucible in argon atmosphere (flow, 50 mL min−1) with a heating rate of 10 K min−1 over the temperature range 30–350°C.

Determination of Stability Constant by HPLC

HPLC method was used to determine the stability constant between AMOX and native β-CD. HPLC experiments were carried out using a Thermo-Finnigan (San Jose, CA, USA) liquid chromatographic system equipped with a vacuum degasser SCM1000 and a narrow-bore quaternary Spectra System P1000XR gradient pump with a loop of 20 µL. A stainless steel column Hyperbond C18 (300 length × 3.9 mm i.d., 10 µm particle size) Shandon was used and thermostated at 25°C with a column temperature controller 560-CIL (Cluzeau Info Labo, Puteaux-la-Defense, France). The effluents were monitored with a double-beam spectrophotometric detector (Spectra System UV1000) at 228 nm.

The mobile phase was constituted of increasing concentrations of β-CD (0, 0.15, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, and 4.5 mM) dissolved in an aqueous monobasic potassium phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 5). It was then filtered through a Millipore membrane (0.45 μm). The flow rate of eluent was set at 0.5 mL min−1. The retention times of drug final concentration (15 × 10−6 M) in the absence and in the presence of excess amounts of CDs in the mobile phase were measured.

The stability constant (KC) was determined by the retention method as described by Uekama et al. (26):

graphic file with name M2.gif 2

where (CD)m was the concentration of CD in the mobile phase and T0′, Tc, and Tobs were retention times of AMOX, of [AMOX:CD] complex, and of AMOX at a given concentration of CD, respectively. A plot of the left hand term versus (CD)m gave both the Kc and Tc values from the linear relationship by slope on intercept.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

FT-IR Results

The complexation between AMOX and β-CD can be inferred by comparing the IR spectra of free AMOX, AMOX-β-CD physical mixture and [AMOX:β-CD] complex. FT-IR is not suitable for the detection of inclusion compounds if the resulting spectra present a superposition of host and guest bands. Fortunately, AMOX exhibits some characteristic IR absorption bands in the spectra region where β-CD has a weak one, making this region (1,775–1,240 cm−1 in this case) suitable for detecting host–guest interactions. The FT-IR spectra in this region of AMOX and AMOX-β-CD binary system, of molar ratio 1:1, are shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

FT-IR spectrum of amoxicillin (dashed line), β-CD (dotted line), and amoxicillin–β-CD (solid line) binary system of molar ratio 1:1 in the region 1,100–1,800 cm−1

Frequencies assigned to aromatic C=C, to νNH, to amidic νC=O, to β-lactamic C=O (νC=O), and to carboxylate (νsCOO) (νasCOO), have all been identified in free AMOX (zwitterion) and are reported in Table I. These results are in accordance with the literature (27,28). The more relevant bands of the IR spectra of the complexes (1:0.25 to 1:5.0) obtained by the two methods are compiled in Table I.

Table I.

Assignment of Relevant IR Absorption Bands of Amoxicillin and Amoxicillin–β-CD Binary System

Assignment AMOX Complex: method 1 (cm−1) Complex: method 2 (cm−1)
Pure (cm−1) 1:0.25 1:0.5 1:1.0 1:3.0 1:5.0 1:0.25 1:0.5 1:1.0 1:3.0 1:5.0
ν C=O (β-lactamic) 1776 1777 1770 1769 1770 1770 1769
ν C=O (amide) 1,687 1,689 1,691 1,691 1,686 1,692 1,691 1,691 1,686
C=C (aromatic) 1,616 1,616 1,614 1,614 1,613 1,615 1,614 1,614 1,613
ν asCOO 1,582 1,595 1,596 1,597 1,595 1,596 1,597
δ NH (amide) 1,519 1,517 1,517 1,517 1,516 1,515 1,516 1,517 1,517 1,516 1,515
ν sCOO 1,397 1,401 1,403 1,404 1,406 1,405 1,403 1,403 1,404 1,406 1,405

The infrared spectrum of the free AMOX showed strong absorption at 1,776 cm−1, characteristic of the β-lactam ring. Same shifts have been observed whatever preparation method used. In all the complexes, the β-lactamic νC=O was shifted toward lower frequencies 1,769 cm−1 for 1:1 complexes. On the other hand, the carboxylate νasCOO (1,582 cm−1) and νsCOO (1,397 cm−1) were shifted toward higher frequencies (1,597 cm−1) and (1,404 cm−1), respectively, for 1:1 complexes as shown in Table I. The shift of the stretching vibration to higher frequency is the result of the formation of a strong hydrogen bond between the carboxylate group and the proton of an alcohol function on the CD host. As the spectral changes are due to atom group vibrations directly involved in interaction, these experimental findings clearly indicate both the β-lactamic carbonyl group and the carboxylate being involved in the complexation in all the binary systems AMOX-β-CD.

NMR Results

1H-NMR analysis of AMOX, β-CD, and putative complexes of AMOX with β-CD were performed in D2O due to the good solubility of the AMOX, native β-CD, and the binary AMOX-β-CD systems in this solvent. Induced changes in the chemical shifts for AMOX (Δδ) were collected in Tables II and III for binary systems obtained by methods 1 and 2, respectively. Complexation of AMOX with β-CD, obtained with the two methods, resulted in little or no shift of the H-3 protons located in the CD cavity, which is in agreement with data reported by Maffeo et al. (22). An absence of H-5 protons signal appeared after the first addition of the CD.

Table II.

Induced Changes in the Amoxicillin (Δδ) Chemical Shifts for Binary Systems Obtained by Method 1

Assignment Δδ = δ complexδ free (Hz)
1:0.25 1:0.5 1:1 1:3 1:5
Aromatic 0.000 −0.001 −0.004 −0.011 −0.015
Aromatic −0.002 −0.002 −0.005 −0.011 −0.016
Aromatic −0.001 −0.003 −0.005 −0.011 −0.015
Aromatic −0.001 −0.002 −0.006 −0.011 −0.016
β-lactam 0.005 −0.004 −0.015 −0.036 −0.055
β-lactam −0.004 −0.006 −0.017 −0.037 −0.054
β-lactam 0.004 0.006 0.016 0.033 0.049
β-lactam −0.006 0.013 0.030 0.046
10H 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.000
3H thyazol 0.002 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.004
Methyl (thyazolidic) 0.000 −0.002 −0.004 −0.010 −0.015
Methyl (thyazolidic) 0.003 0.003 0.009 0.018 0.023

Table III.

Induced Changes in the Amoxicillin (Δδ) Chemical Shifts for Binary Systems Obtained by Method 2

Assignment Δδ = δ complexδ free (Hz)
1:0.25 1:0.5 1:1 1:3 1:5
Aromatic −0.005 −0.001 −0.007 −0.013 −0.018
Aromatic −0.004 −0.002 −0.007 −0.013 −0.018
Aromatic −0.005 −0.003 −0.008 −0.014 −0.019
Aromatic −0.005 −0.002 −0.008 −0.013 −0.019
β-lactam −0.007 −0.004 −0.018 −0.038
β-lactam −0.007 −0.006 −0.018 −0.038 −0.057
β-lactam 0.001 0.006 0.013 0.028 0.044
β-lactam 0.000 0.011 0.027
10H −0.004 0.002 −0.002 −0.004 −0.003
3H thyazol −0.001 0.004 0.001 0.000 0.001
Methyl (thyazolidic) −0.005 −0.002 −0.006 −0.011 −0.017
Methyl (thyazolidic) −0.001 0.003 0.006 0.015 0.021

AMOX did not reveal any chemical variation of the phenol and the H-3 thiazol, whereas a little shift was found for aromatic, β-lactamic, and methylenic hydrogens from the 1:1 to the 1:5 [AMOX:β-CD] complex.

The H-5, H-6 resonance of AMOX took the form of an AB quartet in the 5.38- to 5.42-ppm range with doublet separations (3J) of 3.8 Hz characteristic of cis protons in lactam (29). For the complex, they were in resonance also in the quartet form (5.39–5.40) with same (3J5,6) magnitude which confirms a closed β-lactam ring.

No dipolar proton interactions between AMOX and CD were observed in the 2D ROESY spectrum (Fig. 3), which suggests the absence of any defined molecular association in solution. However, we cannot exclude that fast intermolecular exchanges have occurred and may have prevented the observation of such an association at the NMR scale. The coexistence of two different orientational isomers may also explain the absence of a chemical shift of the β-CD cavity protons (24,25,29).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

2D ROESY spectrum of [AMOX: β-CD] (1:1) mixture

DSC Results

TG and DSC analysis are widespread approaches in characterization of multicomponent systems such as inclusion compounds in the solid state. Therefore, the thermal properties of AMOX, β-CD, [AMOX:β-CD] complex, and physical mixture of AMOX with β-CD were investigated.

The AMOX mass spectrum (Fig. 4) presents five major molecular ions (m/z = 12, 17, 18, 34, and 44). At 6 min, the 17 and 18 molecular ions in the mass spectrum correspond to the loss of water (5.95%). At 17 min, the m/z = 44, 34, and 12 indicate AMOX degradation.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Mass spectrum of amoxicillin selected molecular ions

Figure 5 shows the TG and DSC data of AMOX from 30°C to 300°C. The AMOX DSC thermogram exhibits a first endothermic peak between 57.7°C and 97.2°C with a maximum at 83.3°C (ΔH = −264.8 J g−1), which corresponds to the dehydration of AMOX. At this endothermic peak corresponds a mass loss of 5.95%. Then, AMOX is thermally decomposed at several stages with a total weight loss of 51.06%, leaving a residual mass at 350°C of 48.94%. The DSC confirms the thermal decomposition of AMOX. Moreover, AMOX DSC curve displays an exothermic peak with an onset at 161.7°C related to the AMOX transition into the crystal state (ΔH = 47.06 J g−1) and an endothermic broad peak at 185.5–242.8°C attributed to the AMOX fusion degradation event (ΔH = −125.0 J g−1). Marciniec et al. (30) reported a melting point for AMOX trihydrate at 190.1°C in helium atmosphere and at a scanning rate of 5°C min−1.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Mass change (dashed line) and DSC solid line) thermogram of amoxicillin

Figure 6 compares DSC measurements of AMOX, β-CD, [AMOX:β-CD] [1:1] complex, and AMOX-β-CD physical mixture. The [1:1] complex shows the complete disappearance of exothermic and endothermic peaks between 200.5°C and 242.3°C. This flattening profile may be regarded as a conclusive evidence of a molecular encapsulation of AMOX inside the β-CD cavity. A control of the inclusion complex formation was brought by registering the physical mixture DSC profile which shows the superimposition of the two components profiles.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

DSC thermogram of AMOX (solid line), β-CD (thick dashed line), AMOXβ-CD physical mixture (thin dashed line) and [AMOX:β-CD] complex (dotted line)

Stability Constant Determined by HPLC

In order to determine stability constant of [AMOX:β-CD] complex, we used HPLC. An adaptation of the European Pharmacopoeia technique on anion exchange support with an aqueous mobile phase was developed. Potassium dihydrogenophosphate buffer was used as mobile phase since phosphate anions cannot interfere with the complexation process. The column void volume was determined by elution of a thiourea solution (0.273 μg mL−1).

It was found that increasing the concentration of β-CD in the phosphate buffer solution resulted in a shorter retention time for AMOX (Fig. 7), indicating an enhancement of the solubility of this compound by binding to β-CD. Figure 8 shows the determination of KC from the retention time data of [AMOX:β-CD] complex according to Eq. 1. As shown in this figure, a linear plot (correlation coefficient r² = 0.99) was obtained with β-CD, indicating 1:1 stoichiometry of the [AMOX:β-CD] complex.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Observed HPLC retention times for AMOX with varying concentrations of β-CD in the phosphate buffer mobile phase

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Determination of K c from the HPLC retention time data of [AMOX:β-CD] complexes

The equation of the line for AMOX with β-CD was:

graphic file with name M3.gif 3

A stability constant of 1,878 M−1 was found for the [AMOX:β-CD] complex, suggesting that this system might be suitable for pharmaceutical use (31). This association constant represents the proportions of free drug and free β-CD in solution versus the concentration of [AMOX:β-CD] complex.

In summary, complexation of AMOX anhydride with β-CD at pH 5 was provn by FT-IR, NMR, HPLC, and thermal analysis. The 1:1 stoichiometry for the complexes was obtained by HPLC experiments. It should be pointed out that β-CD shows good interaction with AMOX regards to its high stability constant. Preparation methods were conducted exactly to the formation of the same complexes. Sonication in solution of the two molecules before equilibration was unnecessary. The major spectral changes on FT-IR spectra of AMOX and β-CD complex were between 1,775 and 1,250 cm−1. They showed an interaction of AMOX carbonyl group on β-lactam ring and of carboxylate with CD macrocycle. The shift of the carboxylate vibrational band characterized the establishment of hydrogen bonds with secondary hydroxyl groups of β-CD. As observed by NMR, complexation of AMOX with β-CD resulted in very little or no shift of the CD inner protons, whereas the aromatic, β-lactamic, and methylenic hydrogen of AMOX were little shifted and in the lack of any visible correlation in the ROESY spectrum. Considering the size and structure of AMOX, we could not consider that AMOX was totally included in the β-CD cavity which was too small. Then, we could imagine the coexistence of different complexes which could be orientational isomers (32); each complex should include an opposite part of AMOX. As suggested by Maffeo (22), apparently, the results in the net zero chemical shift displacement was possibly due to nearly equal shielding caused by phenyl ring inclusion and deshielding caused by the penam ring inclusion.

CONCLUSION

In the [AMOX:β-CD] complex, the phenyl group was included inside the β-CD, whereas the penam ring was gradually driven out of the β-CD cavity so that the ionized carboxyl group on the penam ring formed hydrogen bonds with the secondary hydroxyl groups of β-CD to keep the complex stable, as previously observed by Aki (20) for the ampicillin–HPCD complex by other methods.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Professor Mutzenhardt (Laboratoire de Méthodologie en RMN, Faculté des Sciences et Techniques, Nancy) for his help in performing 2D ROESY analysis. We also thank Professor Marsura for his help and Mme Anne Marie Canziani for her technical assistance.

References

  • 1.Wilson W, Taubert KA, Gewitz M, Lockhart PB, Baddour LM, Levison M, et al. Prevention of infective endocarditis: guidelines from the American Heart Association: a guideline from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(739–45):747–60. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bresco-Salinas M, Costa-Riu N, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Antibiotic susceptibility of the bacteria causing odontogenic infections. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006;11:E70–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hansmann Y. Treatment and prevention of Lyme disease. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2009;37:111–29. doi: 10.1159/000213071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kuriyama T, Williams DW, Yanagisawa M, Iwahara K, Shimizu C, Nakagawa K, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 800 anaerobic isolates from patients with dentoalveolar infection to 13 oral antibiotics. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007;22:285–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00365.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Drissi M, Ahmed ZB, Dehecq B, Bakour R, Plesiat PHocquet D. Antibiotic susceptibility and mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance among clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report in Algeria. Med Mal Infect. 2008;38:187–91. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2008.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Handal T, Olsen I, Walker CB, Caugant DA. Detection and characterization of beta-lactamase genes in subgingival bacteria from patients with refractory periodontitis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005;242:319–24. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mandsberg LF, Ciofu O, Kirkby N, Christiansen LE, Poulsen HE, Hoiby N. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains with increased mutation frequency due to inactivation of the DNA oxidative repair system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:2483–91. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00428-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shrestha B. Study of beta lactamase activity of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from healthy nasal carriers and hospital isolates. Nepal Med Coll J. 2007;9:107–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Voha C, Docquier JD, Rossolini GM, Fosse T. Genetic and biochemical characterization of FUS-1 (OXA-85), a narrow-spectrum class D beta-lactamase from Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:2673–9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00058-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kaner D, Christan C, Dietrich T, Bernimoulin JP, Kleber BM, Friedmann A. Timing affects the clinical outcome of adjunctive systemic antibiotic therapy for generalized aggressive periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2007;78:1201–8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2007.060437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moeintaghavi A, Talebi-ardakani MR, Haerian-ardakani A, Zandi H, Taghipour S, Fallahzadeh H, et al. Adjunctive effects of systemic amoxicillin and metronidazole with scaling and root planing: a randomized, placebo controlled clinical trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:51–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Villoria A, Garcia P, Calvet X, Gisbert JP, Vergara M. Meta-analysis: high-dose proton pump inhibitors vs. standard dose in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:868–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Szejtli J. Cyclodextrin Technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Aleem O, Kuchekar B, Pore Y, Late S. Effect of beta-cyclodextrin and hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin complexation on physicochemical properties and antimicrobial activity of cefdinir. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;47:535–40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Beni S, Szakacs Z, Csernak O, Barcza L, Noszal B. Cyclodextrin/imatinib complexation: binding mode and charge dependent stabilities. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2007;30:167–74. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2006.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Figueiras A, Sarraguca JM, Carvalho RA, Pais AA, Veiga FJ. Interaction of omeprazole with a methylated derivative of beta-cyclodextrin: phase solubility, NMR spectroscopy and molecular simulation. Pharm Res. 2007;24:377–89. doi: 10.1007/s11095-006-9161-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Uekama K, Hirayama F, Irie T. Cyclodextrin drug carrier systems. Chem Rev. 1998;98:2045–76. doi: 10.1021/cr970025p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pajatsch M, Andersen C, Mathes A, Bock A, Benz R, Engelhardt H. Properties of a cyclodextrin-specific, unusual porin from Klebsiella oxytoca. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:25159–66. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.35.25159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pajatsch M, Gerhart M, Peist R, Horlacher R, Boos W, Bock A. The periplasmic cyclodextrin binding protein CymE from Klebsiella oxytoca and its role in maltodextrin and cyclodextrin transport. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2630–5. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.10.2630-2635.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aki H, Niiya T, Iwase Y, Kawasaki Y, Kumai K, Kimura T. Multimodal inclusion complexes of ampicillin with β-cyclodextrins in aqueous solution. Thermochim Acta. 2004;416:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2003.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Athanassiou G, Michaleas S, Lada-Chitiroglou E, Tsitsa T, Antoniadou-Vyza E. Antimicrobial activity of beta-lactam antibiotics against clinical pathogens after molecular inclusion in several cyclodextrins. A novel approach to bacterial resistance. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2003;55:291–300. doi: 10.1211/002235702649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maffeo D, Leondiadis L, Mavridis IM, Yannakopoulou K. Positive effect of natural and negatively charged cyclodextrins on the stabilization of penicillins towards beta-lactamase degradation due to inclusion and external guest–host association. An NMR and MS study. Org Biomol Chem. 2006;4:1297–304. doi: 10.1039/b517275f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.The Merck Index. In Windholz M., Budavari S., Blumetti R.F., Otterbein E.S., editors. Tenthed. Merck and Co., Inc. 1996.
  • 24.Higuchi T, Connors KA. Advances in analytical chemistry and instrumentation. New York: Wiley Interscience; 1965. pp. 117–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Claridge TDW. High resolution NMR techniques in organic chemistry. Oxford: Pergamon; 1999. pp. 320–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Uekama K, Hirayama F, Irie T. The new method for determination of the stability constants of cyclodextrin-prostaglandin inclusion complexes by liquid chromatography. Chemistry Letters. 1978; p. 661–664.
  • 27.Di Stefano R, Scopelliti M, Pellerito C, Fiore T, Vitturi R, Colomba MS, et al. Organometallic complexes with biological molecules. XVII. Triorganotin(IV) complexes with amoxicillin and ampicillin. J Inorg Biochem. 2002;89:279–92. doi: 10.1016/S0162-0134(02)00366-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fogazzi GB, Cantu M, Saglimbeni L, Daudon M. Amoxycillin, a rare but possible cause of crystalluria. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:212–4. doi: 10.1093/ndt/18.1.212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mc Millan I, Stoodley RJ. A novel rearrangement of methyl-6 chloropenicillanate. Tetrahydron Lett. 1966;11:1205–10. doi: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)72394-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Marciniec B, Plotkowiak Z, Wachowski L, Kozak M, Popielarz-Brzezinska M. Analytical study of γ-irradiated antibiotics in the solid state. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2002;68:423–36. doi: 10.1023/A:1016027416521. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Szejtli J. Inclusion compounds: physical properties and applications. In: Atwood JL, Davies JE, MacNicol DD, editors. Inclusion compounds. London: Academic; 1984. pp. 331–89. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nepogodiev SA, Stoddart JF. Cyclodextrin-based catenanes and rotaxanes. Chem Rev. 1998;98:1959–76. doi: 10.1021/cr970049w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AAPS PharmSciTech are provided here courtesy of American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists

RESOURCES