Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2010 Aug;22(3):667–678. doi: 10.1017/S0954579410000350

A Cascade Model Connecting Life Stress to Risk Behavior Among Rural African American Emerging Adults

Gene H Brody 1, Yi-fu Chen 1, Steven M Kogan 1
PMCID: PMC2902871  NIHMSID: NIHMS217068  PMID: 20576186

Abstract

A 3-wave cascade model linking life stress to increases in risk behavior was tested with 347 African American emerging adults living in the rural South. Data analyses using structural equation modeling and latent growth curve modeling demonstrated that life stress was linked to increases in risk behavior as African Americans transitioned out of secondary school. The cascade model indicated that life stress fostered increases in negative emotions. Negative emotions, in turn, were linked to increases in affiliations with deviant peers and romantic partners; this forecast increases in risk behavior. The findings supported a stress proliferation framework, in which primary stressors affect increases in secondary stressors that carry forward to influence changes in risk behaviors that can potentially compromise mental health.

Keywords: African American, emerging adulthood, risk behavior, stress


In 1989, the W. T. Grant Foundation issued an influential report, The Forgotten Half: Non-College Bound Youth in America, an analysis of life situations of young people who do not attend college after high school. Twenty years later, the forgotten half remains forgotten in the sense that programmatic, longitudinal studies of young people who are not college bound are rare. The majority of rural African American emerging adults in the South are part of the forgotten half. Only 12% of African American secondary school graduates in the rural Southern counties in which the present research was conducted complete postsecondary education programs (Boatright & Bachtel, 2005). In these places, the transition routes for emerging adults after secondary school are unstructured and left largely to individual initiative. When they leave school, most rural African Americans have no jobs; eventually, they find part-time or full-time employment performing simple functions in retail and service sector jobs that offer little training and no opportunity for advancement. Job turnover rates are high during this period, as the combined effects of poor preparation for employment and disadvantageous hiring practices make the transition to the workforce a protracted and often demoralizing process (Gore & Aseltine, 2003; Holz & Tienda, 1998). This challenge occurs while the social controls and support that families provide to some emerging adults start to diminish (Aquilino, 1997). Many rural African American emerging adults are thus confronted with challenging environments that provide minimal resources and diminishing social support to help them embark on beneficial life paths. Some who see no pathway to adequate subsistence, much less the attainment of life course goals, cope by engaging in risk behaviors that include marijuana use, excessive drinking, and sexual intercourse while using substances (Allison, Adlaf, & Mates, 1997; Folkman, Chesney, Pollack, & Phillips, 1992; Martin, Tuch, & Roman, 2003).

The epidemiology of risk behaviors among rural African American emerging adults reflects the aforementioned realities of life in rural, Southern communities. As rural African Americans transition from adolescence to emerging adulthood, their rates of substance use and sexual risk behaviors tend to surpass those of urban dwellers (Kogan, Berkel, Chen, Brody, & Murry, 2006; Milhausen et al., 2003). These behaviors have prognostic significance for academic failure in college and trade school, increases in externalizing and internalizing symptoms, unintended pregnancy, inability to find and keep employment, involvement with the criminal justice system, and HIV infection (Achenbach, Howell, McConaughy, & Stanger, 1998; Brook et al., 2004; Chatterji, 2006; DuRant, Smith, Kreiter, & Krowchuk, 1999). HIV infection is a particular risk for African Americans living in the rural South. Their infection rate is more that eight times that of Caucasians in this region and three times that of residents of the United States as a whole (Hall, Li, & McKenna, 2005). The processes that contribute to increases in risk behaviors during rural African Americans’ transitions from secondary school into employment and workday routines should be identified, not only to advance knowledge of their etiology and the trajectories they foster but also to inform the design of preventive interventions.

We used a three-wave prospective research design that spanned the last year and a half of secondary school and the first year after school to advance and evaluate predictions about the cascade of processes set in motion by life stresses in rural Southern environments. This cascade was hypothesized to forecast increases in risk behavior among rural African American emerging adults. Our predictions about cascade processes were derived from developmental psychopathology theory (Cicchetti & Tucker, 1994; Masten & Coatsworth, 1998) and, more specifically, from Pearlin and colleagues’ stress proliferation framework (Pearlin, 1989; Pearlin, Schieman, Fazio, & Meersman, 2005). Developmental psychopathology theorists have found that functioning in one domain spills over to exert lasting influences on functioning in other domains. Notable exemplars of this theorizing include the research by scientists at the Oregon Social Learning Center, who have chronicled the ways in which antisocial behavior leads to increases in academic and social problems during childhood that, in turn, detract from subsequent functioning in social, relational, emotional, and behavioral realms during adolescence and emerging adulthood (Capaldi, 1992; Patterson, Reid, & Dishion, 1992). Cicchetti and Schneider-Rosen (1984) posited developmental cascades in which failure to attain efficacy in important developmental tasks (e.g., academic competence) at one development stage would increase vulnerability for compromised functioning at subsequent stages. Masten and colleagues (2005) applied Cicchetti and Schneider-Rosen’s tenets to demonstrate, across a 20-year span, that childhood externalizing problems carry forward to undermine academic competence in adolescence, which subsequently contributes to internalizing problems in emerging adulthood. Thus, changes in one domain have implications for functioning in other areas across time, forming a cascade process.

The specific theoretical model that guided the present predictions were derived from the stress proliferation framework (Pearlin et al., 2005). The notion of stress proliferation arose from the observation that serious stressors tend to give rise to secondary, or proliferated, stressors that carry forward across time to contribute to changes in important social relationships and individual functioning (Hammen, 2003; Pearlin, Aneshensel, & Leblanc, 1997). Applied to the current study, life stress, conceptualized as negative life events and perceived racial discrimination, sponsors increases in the negative emotions of anger and depressive symptoms, which in turn contribute to increases in affiliations with deviant companions, specifically friends and romantic partners. We specified affiliation with deviant companions as the proximal risk factor for increases in emerging adults’ risk behavior. In the following sections, we outline the rationale for particular constructs’ inclusion in the model and summarize the hypotheses.

A basic premise of this study is that life stresses sponsor increases in risk behavior. Life stress is a demonstrated risk factor for adolescents’ high-intensity substance use and other risk behavior because it precipitates emotional distress and perceptions of limited efficacy and control (Brody, Chen, et al., 2006). Cross-sectional surveys, prospective surveys, and experience-sampling studies with adolescents in the United States and other countries have found initiation and escalation of risk behaviors to be positively associated with life stress (Aseltine & Gore, 2000; Castro, Maddahian, Newcomb, & Bentler, 1987; Cooper, Shapiro, & Powers, 1998; He, Kramer, Houser, Hacker, & Chomitz, 2004; Patton et al., 1996; Unger, Hamilton, & Sussman, 2004; Whalen, Jamner, Henker, & Delfino, 2001; Windle, Mun, & Windle, 2005). Baumeister and Scher (1988) advanced a parsimonious interpretation of this link. People desire the quickest possible escape from life stress and the negative affect that accompanies it; this increases the attraction of activities that provide short-term relief. Thus, the “quick fix” that risk behavior offers becomes appealing regardless of possible longer-term costs to health and well-being.

In addition to negative life events associated with opportunity limitations, African Americans in rural, Southern communities are often targets of discriminatory behavior (Brody, Chen, et al., 2006; Brody, Kogan, Chen, & Murry, 2008; Gibbons, Gerrard, Cleveland, Wills, & Brody, 2004; Simons, Chen, Stewart, & Brody, 2003). Racial discrimination is a particularly pernicious stressor because it regularly induces anger, frustration, and depressive symptoms that can compromise physical and mental health outcomes across time (Pearlin et al., 2005). Numerous studies support this proposition and indicate that racial discrimination forecasts increases in substance use as well (Pascoe & Smart Richman, 2009). Thus, we hypothesize that life stress, conceptualized as a combination of negative life events and perceived racial discrimination, will forecast increases in African Americans’ risk behaviors across the transition out of secondary school in rural, Southern communities.

We predicted that the life stresses African Americans experience in rural, Southern communities would initiate a cascade that begins with increases in negative emotions. The theoretical underpinnings for this hypothesis were derived from (Berkowitz, 1989) reformulation of the frustration-aggression hypothesis and from general strain theory (Agnew, 1992). Berkowitz demonstrated that many stressful, punishing, or painful events and conditions are lawfully related to increased negative affect that varies from despondency to anger in both humans and other species. Likewise, Agnew speculated that chronic aversive events and social relations generate negative affect that carries forward to influence the selection of social networks and the subsequent behaviors that they sponsor. The literature documents clearly that life stress is associated with elevated levels of negative emotion (Aseltine, Gore, & Gordon, 2000; Belle, 1982; Brody, Chen, et al., 2006; Simons, Murry, et al., 2002; Turner, Russell, Glover, & Hutto, 2007). No studies of which we are aware, however, have examined the possibility that life stress as African Americans experience it in rural, Southern contexts induces negative emotions that cascade forward to increase emerging adults’ likelihood of making choices that are linked to increases in risk behavior.

We hypothesized that negative emotions would carry forward to forecast an increase in affiliations with deviant companions, and that these affiliations would serve as the proximal predictor of risk behavior. Because emerging adults are not randomly assigned to friends and romantic partners, the observed similarities in self-regulation, future orientation, and negative emotionality that adolescents and emerging adults share with their friends and romantic partners is due partly to young people’s tendency to seek like-minded companions (Caspi & Herbener, 1990, 1993; Connell & Dishion, 2006; Furman & Escudero, 2006; Rutter et al., 1996; Sieving, Perry, & Williams, 2000; Simons, Stewart, Gordon, Conger, & Elder, 2002; Vanyukov, Neale, Moss, & Tarter, 1996). Hopelessness and disinterest in long-term goals often accompany anger and depression (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). This perspective can be expected to influence emerging adults’ selection of companions who share and support their norms, attitudes, and behavior. This differential affiliation or assortative mating process has a straightforward explanation. It is rewarding to be around a friend or romantic partner who engages in actions one regularly enjoys but unpleasant to spend time with those whose behavior strikes one as unfamiliar or critical. Consistent with this idea, several studies demonstrate that persons experiencing negative emotions select as friends, and are likely to meet, date, and begin romantic relationships with, individuals who also experience high levels of negative emotions and who also are less conventional, with antisocial leanings (Cairns & Cairns, 1994; Daley & Hammen, 2002; Meeus, Branje, & Overbeek, 2004; Quinton, Pickles, Maughan, & Rutter, 1993; Werner & Smith, 2001). Thus, we predict that emerging adults reporting relatively higher levels of anger and depression will increase their affiliations with companions who are involved in deviant behaviors. Such companions are likely to model, sanction, and encourage involvement with risk behaviors.

A second purpose of this study was to illustrate two complementary methods for approaching and analyzing cascade hypotheses using structural equation modeling (SEM) and a combination of SEM and latent growth modeling (LGM) (Duncan, Duncan, & Strycker, 2006). Both of these approaches can be used to analyze repeated measures data and change over time, with somewhat different emphases. SEM uses an autoregressive approach in which participants’ rank orders on predictor constructs are compared with their rank orders on outcome constructs. Such autoregressive procedures examine change by using residual scores. The SEM-LGM approach illustrated in this report uses SEM to test the hypothesized temporal ordering of the cascade constructs and LGM is used to link cascade constructs to intraindividual trajectories of change in risk behavior. LGM fits a regression line to the three risk behavior data points for each participant; these regression lines describe change in each participant’s behavior over the course of the study. Thus, change in risk behaviors over time is determined using actual data rather than residual scores to test the hypothesized cascade model.

Summary of the Present Research

This study was conducted with rural African American youth as they transitioned out of secondary school, using procedures that have been shown to yield reliable data from longitudinal, epidemiological research focusing on risk behaviors; these procedures include computer-based interviewing, matching of interviewers and participants by ethnicity, and extensive reassurances concerning confidentiality of the data (Brody, Chen, et al., 2006; Patrick et al., 1994). We predicted that (a) life stress that African Americans experience in rural, Southern communities would be linked to increases in risk behaviors across the transition out of secondary school, and (b) a conceptual model involving cascades across life stress, negative emotions, and affiliations with deviant companions would explain the connection of life stress to increases in risk behaviors across the challenging life course transition to emerging adulthood.

Method

Participants were African American emerging adults who resided in a rural area of Georgia in which poverty rates are among the highest in the nation (Proctor & Dalaker, 2003). Data were collected within the context of a family-based prevention study, with data collection intervals timed to evaluate the prevention program. Three waves of data spanning 1 ½ years were obtained. In the analyses reported in this paper, assignment to the prevention program or to a control group was controlled. Program participation did not moderate any of the pathways analyzed in this report.

Participants

Study participants were 347 African American youth who were in the last two years of secondary school at the beginning of the study (M age = 17.7). Although the students’ primary caregivers worked an average of 38.5 hours per week (SD = 11.1), 41.8% of their families lived below federal poverty standards, and another 15% lived within 150% of the poverty threshold. Youths’ families were representative of the areas in which they lived (Boatright & Bachtel, 2005); they are best described as working poor. Of the youth in the sample, 58.5% were female; a majority, 63.6%, lived in single-parent households. A majority of the students’ caregivers, 78.7%, had completed high school or earned a GED; the median family income of $1948.25 per month was representative of the sampled population (Boatright & Bachtel, 2005).

Recruitment

In six rural counties, secondary schools provided lists of 11th- and 12th- grade students, and participants were selected randomly from these lists. Families were contacted and recruited by community liaisons who resided in the counties in which the participants lived. At the conclusion of the recruitment process, a total of 700 families with an 11th or 12th grade student had been identified; of these families, 347 (52%) agreed to participate and completed the measures. Families who declined participation cited time constraints, scheduling conflicts, and uneasiness about research participation as their reasons. This recruitment rate is similar to those of other prevention trials that address problematic and high-risk behaviors (Brody et al., 2004). Of the sample, 87% competed the third wave of data collection, which took place 1 ½ years after the first wave.

Procedures

To enhance rapport and cultural understanding, African American university students and community members served as field researchers to collect data. At the each data collection point, one home visit lasting 2 hours was made to each family. The Wave 2 data collection took place approximately 5 months after the Wave 1 data collection, and Wave 3 data collection took place approximately 1 year after the Wave 2 collection. At the home visits, self-report questionnaires were administered to target youth in an interview format that eliminated literacy concerns. Each interview was conducted privately, with no other family members present or able to overhear the conversation. Informed consent forms were completed at all data collection points. Each family was paid $100 at each of the three assessments.

Measures

The measures were selected for their evaluation relevance and were derived from previous research that included interviews with focus groups, pilot tests, and construct validation of measures. Scales were constructed so that high scores indicated relatively high levels of the variable assessed.

Demographics

Monthly income, maternal age, and number of children in the household were recorded. Maternal education was measured on a scale ranging from 1 (grades 1 to 4) to 10 (doctorate or professional degree). Each family’s poverty status was computed based on per capita income and federal guidelines.

Life stress

The life stress construct, assessed at Waves 1 and 2, was composed of negative life events and perceived racial discrimination. Youth used a 12-item checklist of negative stressful events (Ge, Conger, Lorenz, & Simons, 1994) to indicate whether or not a given event had occurred during the previous 6 months. The items on the checklist focused on events that the youth experienced directly, for example, having a serious accident, ending a relationship with a romantic partner, or getting in trouble with the police. Because this instrument is an index rather than a psychometric scale, internal consistently could not be computed. Instances of perceived racial discrimination were assessed with the Racist Hassles Questionnaire, an 8-item measure that our research group developed in cooperation with focus groups of African Americans. The measure has demonstrated concurrent and predictive validity in several studies involving rural African American preadolescents and adolescents (Brody, Chen, et al., 2006; Gibbons et al., 2004; Simons et al., 2003). The items were based on experiences that rural African Americans had identified as forms of discrimination common in their communities. Examples include being treated rudely or disrespectfully and being the target of racial insults. Respondents indicated the frequency of discriminatory experiences during the past 6 months on a scale ranging from 1 = never to 4 = several times. Coefficient alpha for the scale exceeded .85. The negative stressful events measure and the instances of perceived discrimination measure were standardized and summed to form the life stress construct.

Deviant companions

This construct was composed of youths’ self-reports on two scales at Waves 1 and 2. Youth reported the proportions of their close friends (none of them, some of them, all of them) who engaged in any of 15 deviant or risk-taking behaviors drawn from Elliot’s work with delinquent youth (Elliott, Ageton, & Huizinga, 1985). Behaviors included selling drugs, getting in trouble with the police, skipping school, and damaging property. Cronbach’s alpha exceeded .85 at all waves of data collection. Youth also reported, on a scale ranging from 1 = never to 3 = often, how often their current or last romantic partners engaged in a similar set of deviant or risk-taking behaviors. Youth were first asked if, during the past 3 months, they had a romantic partner, defined as someone the youth “was dating, a boyfriend or girlfriend, or a ‘friend with benefits.’” The majority responded affirmatively. Because the items on the two scales tended to overlap, and because friends and romantic partners typically belonged to the same peer groups, we summed the scales to form the deviant companions construct rather than treating them as distinct indicators. Cronbach’s alpha exceeded .75 at each data collection wave.

Negative emotions

Two scales, administered at Waves 1 and 2, were used to assess this construct. The Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) is a self-rated measure of depressive symptoms occurring during the past week. It consists of 20 items with a response set ranging from 0 = rarely, less than 1 day to 3 = most of the time, 5–7 days. The CES-D has been well validated and used extensively with African American samples (Beach et al., 2008; Pumariega, Johnson, Sheridan, & Cuffe, 1996). Cronbach’s alpha for the scores on the total scale exceeded .75 across all waves of data collection. Youth also completed the State Anger subscale of Spielberger’s State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (Spielberger, 1999). Respondents indicated, on a scale ranging from 1 = never to 5 = always, the frequency with which they experienced 15 emotional states, such as furious, angry, and like breaking things, during the past 3 months. Cronbach’s alpha for the scores on the total scale exceeded .90 at each wave of data collection.

Risk behaviors

Risk behaviors were evaluated at each wave using an instrument that we have used previously with rural African American adolescents (Brody, Beach, et al., 2009; Brody, Chen, Beach, Philibert, & Kogan, 2009; Brody, Murry, et al., 2006). Youth indicated the number of times during the past month they had used marijuana, drunk three or more alcoholic beverages (beer, wine, wine coolers, whiskey, gin, or other liquor) at one time, or had sexual intercourse while using substances. Responses to these items were summed to form a past-month risk behavior index.

Results

Attrition Analyses

To test for differences among families who provided data at different waves, we compared families and targets who provided data at wave 1 but not at wave 3 (n = 45) with those who provided data at all waves (n = 302). T-tests conducted on each study measure, as well as on monthly income, maternal education, maternal age, and number of children in the household, detected no intergroup differences.

Plan of Analysis for the Study Hypotheses

Two ways of analyzing the study hypotheses were implemented, a SEM approach and a SEM-LGM approach. The SEM approach used a reciprocal influence model, depicted in Figure 1, to test the study hypotheses that increases in cascade processes from Wave 1 to Wave 2 would occur in a specific order and would carry forward to predict increases in risk behavior from Wave 2 to Wave 3. Specifically, we conjectured that increases in life stress would lead to increases in negative emotions that, in turn, would lead to increases in affiliations with deviant companions. The increase in such affiliations was hypothesized to serve as the proximal cascade construct responsible for increases in risk behavior from Wave 1 to Wave 2. Consistent with findings that risk behaviors among rural African American youths evince cumulative continuity across time (Brody, Beach, et al., 2009; Brody, Chen, Beach, et al., 2009), increases in risk behavior from Wave 1 to Wave 2 were hypothesized to carry forward to predict increases in risk behavior from Wave 2 to Wave 3.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Theoretical SEM reciprocal influence cascade model.

The SEM-LGM analysis proceeded in several steps. In the first step, the study premise was tested that life stress across the transition out of secondary school in rural, Southern communities sets in motion a series of specific cascades that leads to an increase in negative emotions; in turn, negative emotions lead to affiliations with deviant companions. To verify these hypotheses, we conducted two cross-lag analyses using the first two waves of data. In the second step, LGM (Singer & Willett, 2003) was used to test the study hypothesis that life stress would forecast increases in risk behavior across emerging adults’ transition to life after secondary school. If the initial cross-lagged analyses support the temporal ordering of the cascade constructs, and if the subsequent LGM analysis confirms the prospective link between life stress and trajectories of risk behavior, SEM is used to test the cascade hypothesis that life stress occasions increases in negative emotions that carry forward to increase affiliations with deviant companions. Increased affiliation with deviant companions serves as the proximal risk factor that forecasts increases in the slope of risk behaviors.

A SEM Reciprocal Influence Analysis of the Cascade Model

All analyses included 347 participants. The analyses were performed using SEM in Mplus 5.2 with full information maximum likelihood estimation (FIML). FIML does not delete cases that are missing from only one or two waves of data collection, nor does it delete cases that are missing a variable within a wave of data collection. Thus, this method avoids potential problems, such as biased parameter estimates, that are more likely to occur if pairwise or listwise deletion procedures are used to compensate for missing data.

The structural model was specified with changes in life stress from Wave 1 to Wave 2 as the exogenous construct, not predicted by any prior variable in the model. Changes in negative emotion and affiliations with deviant companions at Wave 2 were specified as endogenous constructs, predicted by prior variables in the model, and change in risk behavior from Wave 2 to Wave 3 was specified as the criterion construct. Table 1 presents the correlation matrix, means, and standard deviations for the SEM variables. All indices showed that the structural model, presented in Figure 2 with standardized coefficients, fit the data well: χ2 = 64.52, df = 31, p < .001; comparative fit index (CFI) = .97; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .06(.04, .07). As hypothesized, the exogenous construct, increase in life stress, forecast an increase in negative emotions (β = .675); an increase in negative emotions, however, was also associated with an increase in life stress (β = .302). To test the direction of causality in this reciprocal relationship, each path was constrained to be equal; the constrained model was then compared with one in which the two paths were free to vary. A significant reduction in chi-square from the constrained to the nonconstrained model indicates that one path is stronger than the other. Consistent with the study hypothesis, the path from changes in life stress to increases in negative emotions was stronger than the reverse, Δχ2(1) = 6.63, p < .01. Also, as hypothesized and depicted in Figure 2, changes in negative emotions were linked to changes in affiliations with deviant companions but not the reverse, and affiliations with deviant companions were linked with increases in risk behaviors but not the reverse. Risk behaviors at Wave 2 carried forward to predict increases in risk behavior from Wave 2 to Wave 3.

Table 1.

Intercorrelations, Means, and Standard Deviations for All Study Variables

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11.
Wave 1
1. Life stress --
2. Anger .27 --
3. Depression .29 .44 --
4. Deviant companions .22 .35 .21 --
5. Risk behavior index .22 .15 .02 .21 --
Wave 2
6. Life stress .32 .19 .22 .16 .15 --
7. Anger .33 .63 .37 .26 .09 .36 --
8. Depression .28 .33 .58 .13 .04 .28 .53 --
9. Deviant companions .18 .32 .07 .55 .12 .14 .25 .14 --
10. Risk behavior index .09 .15 -.00 .23 .45 .10 .15 .07 .27 --
Wave 3
11. Risk behavior index .07 .10 .03 .15 .10 .09 .12 .07 .21 .72 --

M 1.62 31.44 11.76 29.47 2.16 1.39 30.38 11.24 30.66 2.23 2.59
SD 1.42 10.74 8.38 9.72 0.73 1.44 11.24 8.20 9.51 0.76 2.75

Note. All correlations greater than .12 are significant at p < .05.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Reciprocal influence structural model.

Two alternative models were tested. In one model, paths were added from the changes in the exogenous and endogenous constructs to Wave 3 changes in risk behaviors. None of these paths were significant and the model showed no significant improvement over the original structural model. In the second alternative model, paths were added from (a) changes in life stress to changes in affiliations with deviant companions and (b) changes in negative emotions to changes in risk behaviors from Wave 1 to Wave 2. Again, none of the paths were significant and the model showed no improvement over the original structural model. Taken together, the reciprocal influence SEM model supports the proposed cascade of processes that accounts for increases in involvement with risk behaviors across emerging adults’ transition to life after secondary school.

SEM-LGM Analysis Linking Life Stress to Risk Behaviors

Direction of causality analyses

Analyzing the cascade model using the SEM-LGM model requires a set of preliminary analyses that verify the direction of causality in the cascade processes. To do this, we conducted two cross-lag analyses using the first two waves of data. SEM was conducted in which the cross-lags (e.g., Wave 1 life stress to Wave 2 negative emotions and the reverse; Wave 1 negative emotions to Wave 2 deviant companions and the reverse) were first constrained to be equal; the constrained models were then compared with ones in which the two paths were free to vary. The non-constrained models, pictured with standardized coefficients in Figure 3, fit the data well: life stress to negative emotions and the reverse, χ2(6) = 19.93, p < .00, CFI = .98, RMSEA) = .08(.04, .12); negative emotions to affiliations with deviant companions and the reverse, χ2(15) = 22.44, p < .02, CFI = .98, RMSEA = .05(.02, .08). A significant reduction in chi-square from the constrained to the nonconstrained model indicates that one cross-lag is stronger than the other. In the cross-lag for the hypothesized path of life stress leading to increases in negative emotions, both cross-lags were significant, but the path from life stress to increases in negative emotions was stronger than the path from negative emotions to increases in life stress (Δχ2[1] = 6.08, p < .01). Similarly, the hypothesized path from negative emotions leading to increases in affiliations with deviant companions rather than the reverse was also supported; only the path from negative emotions to deviant companions was significant (Δχ2[1] = 6.00, p < .01).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cross-lagged analyses.

We began by testing the unconditional model for the risk behavior growth construct by regressing target age on risk behavior. Age in years was allowed to vary across targets at the first (M = 17.73), second (M = 18.31), and third (M = 19.16) assessments. The mean slope was 0.43 (p < .05) and the variance around the slope was .05 (p < .05). Having fit the univariate growth curve to the risk behavior construct, the next step involved testing the conditional model. As expected, life stress at wave 1 was significantly linked, β = .15, with the slope of risk behavior (t = 3.09, p < .002). Consistent with Hypothesis 1, life stress that rural, African American adolescents experienced was linked with increased risk behavior involvement across the transition from secondary school to post-transition life.

Analyses of the cascade model

To test the hypothesized cascade pathways, a SEM model was specified with the slope of risk behavior as the criterion latent construct. Tests of cascade processes require analyses of change; therefore, the SEM model includes assessments of change from Wave 1 to Wave 2 for the constructs of negative emotions and affiliation with deviant companions. Accordingly, Wave 1 paths of these constructs to Wave 2 assessments were included in the SEM model. Adding these paths controlled for Wave 1 levels, resulting in paths within the structural model that assess change. Figure 4 depicts the measurement and structural models for this analysis. All factor loadings for the latent constructs for negative emotions were significant while the life stress and deviant companions constructs were set to unity. The structural model was specified with life stress as the exogenous construct (i.e., not predicted by any prior variable in the model). Negative emotions and deviant companions were specified as endogenous constructs (i.e., can be predicted by prior variables in the model), and the slope of risk behavior was specified as the criterion construct.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

SEM-LGM structural model.

All indices showed that the model, presented in Figure 4 with standardized coefficients, fit the data well, χ2(14) = 11.48, p = .07, CFI = 1.00, RMSEA = .00(.00, .04). As hypothesized, the exogenous variable, life stress, forecast a residualized increase in negative emotions from the first assessment to the second assessment (β = .15, p < .05). Negative emotions were linked positively with a residualized increase in affiliations with deviant companions (β = .38, p < .025), which in turn forecast the slope of risk behavior (β = .23, p < .05). An alternative model was tested with two direct paths added to the model depicted in Figure 4, from life stress at the first assessment to the slope of risk behavior, and from negative emotions at the second assessment to the slope of risk behavior. Neither of the additional paths approached significance, and the model showed no significant improvement in fit over the original structural model. We also examined the possibility that gender could moderate some of the paths in the model. To do this, we conducted multiple group analyses (Singer & Willett, 2003). No gender moderation effects were detected. Thus, to summarize, the SEM-LGC analysis confirmed Hypothesis 1, that life stress would forecast increases in risk behavior over time. As predicted in Hypothesis 2, a cascade of processes that include increases in negative emotions and affiliations with deviant companions emerged, helping to explain how life stress is linked to risk behavior for rural African American emerging adults.

Discussion

We used a longitudinal research design to test hypotheses, from a stress proliferation framework, about the cascade of processes through which life stress characteristic of rural, Southern communities is linked to increases in African American emerging adults’ risk behaviors. The framework led us to specify that life stress would contribute over time to an increase in the proliferated stressor of negative emotions, which would carry forward to sponsor increases in the risk mechanism of affiliation with deviant companions. The results indicated that (a) life stress led to increases in negative emotions and not the reverse; (b) negative emotions led to affiliation with deviant companions and not the reverse; and (c) life stress was linked to increases in risk behaviors in a chain-like, cascading sequence via its link with negative emotions. These effects emerged independent of emerging adult gender.

Few, if any, contemporaneous or longitudinal studies have addressed the ways in which life stresses that non-college bound emerging adults experience are translated into emotional and relational processes that forecast activities with prognostic significance for compromised life course trajectories. The emergence in this study of a chain-like, cascading sequence is important because it underscores the need for longitudinal data and for analytic methods that can be used to test the postulated ordering of the risk indicators and risk mechanisms through which the contributions of life stress are transmitted. Information about the cascade of risk indicators and risk mechanisms is also important from a prevention science perspective. Knowing that life stress induces negative emotions that lead to increases in affiliations with deviant companions will enable prevention scientists to formulate developmentally appropriate interventions that more accurately target protective mechanisms that can interrupt this sequence, such as relationships with family members and natural mentors that reduce stress (Brody, Chen, Kogan, et al., 2009).

The results supported the importance of differential affiliation or assortative mating processes in the cascade process that leads to increases in risk behaviors. This study and others cited previously support the process of phenotypic preference, whereby individuals choose companions with attributes they consider desirable, often behaviors and traits similar to their own. Consistent with the idea that “birds of a feather flock together” (Glueck & Glueck, 1950), this mechanism implies that individuals select partners with risk-related traits similar to their own, such as negative affect. The choice of companions similar to oneself may constitute an attempt to create an environment that supports one’s own behavior (Kendler, Walters, Neale, & Kessler, 1995), in which people with values and behaviors similar to one’s own condone and perhaps encourage engagement in risk behaviors (Engfer, Walper, & Rutter, 1994). After such differential affiliations become established, behavior contagion processes activate (Dishion, Eddy, Haas, Li, & Spracklen, 1997; Dishion, McCord, & Poulin, 1999). These processes include companions’ explicit reinforcement of involvement with risk behavior and disapproval of more conventional conduct (Dishion, Spracklen, Andrews, & Patterson, 1996). Risk behaviors also can be encouraged and maintained without overt behavior contagion processes. For example, the literature on substance use indicates that youths’ perceptions of drug-using companions as attractive also increases the attractiveness of the behaviors in which the companions engage, forecasting youths’ own initiation of those behaviors (Gibbons & Gerrard, 1995). Similarly, perceptions that companions engage in high levels of risk behaviors is itself a risk factor for subsequent involvement (Graham, Taylor, & Hudley, 1998); such perceptions may alter emerging adults’ beliefs concerning norms and consensus about risk behaviors (Brody, Flor, Hollett-Wright, & McCoy, 1998). We conjecture that the cascade process that increases affiliations with deviant companions and involvement in risk behaviors may be mediated by both explicit companion processes and social perceptions about the acceptability of risk behaviors. Further research that includes these processes in the protocols is needed to clarify the ways in which these risk mediation processes operate.

An ancillary purpose of this study was to illustrate two complementary analytic approaches to the testing of cascade models. The first featured SEM, with an autoregressive approach to change for both the cascade variables and the criterion variable, risk behavior. The second was an approach that analyzed change among the cascade variables using the autoregressive SEM while using LGM and the participants’ actual data to examine the link between the cascade constructs and risk behavior. The two analytic approaches yielded identical results, and each had advantages and disadvantages. The advantage of SEM is its capacity to test the hypothesized temporal ordering of the cascade constructs, their link with the criterion construct, and the fit of the data to the hypothesized model in one step; its disadvantage is that change for all parameters is based on group-level rather than individual-level data. Conversely, the advantage of the SEM-LGM approach is its use of participants’ actual data for the criterion construct at each time point rather than group data. The disadvantage is its multistep process. First, cross-lag panel analyses are executed to validate the hypothesized temporal ordering of the cascade constructs; second, a model is tested that examines the fit of the data to the ordering of the cascade constructs and their link to trajectories of change in the criterion construct. For researchers interested in cascade and stress proliferation processes, there may be some merit in incorporating growth modeling approaches into their data analytic repertoire, as it allows an examination of stress proliferation processes and their links with personal developmental trajectories.

Although in the conceptual model we did not predict gender differences, we sought to determine whether gender conditioned any of the pathways in the model; in this study, no differences emerged, even though past research suggests that males are particularly prone to display externalizing behaviors when confronted with chronic life stressors, including racial discrimination (Brody, Chen, et al., 2006). Thus, further research with larger samples is needed, designed to determine whether the theoretical model tested in this study fits equally well for male and female African American emerging adults. This result could be due to the size of the sample, which does not have enough power to detect gender differences.

Assessments of the study constructs were obtained from the emerging adults. The decision to depend on emerging adults’ reports for these constructs was based on the research literature and on our own longitudinal research program with rural African American families. Analyses of primary caregivers’ assessments of target youths’ risk behaviors in our previous studies revealed that caregivers reported a decrease or plateau in them as the youth made the transition to adolescence. The youths’ self-reports, however, did not correspond to this pattern; instead, they evinced increases in risk behaviors. We interpreted this discrepancy as underreporting of risk behaviors on the caregivers’ part as their children grew older (Hartung, McCarthy, Milich, & Martin, 2005; Lahey et al., 2000). A second and related concern that common method variance could account for the findings obtained was addressed through the execution of the cross-lag analyses. This procedure demonstrated that life stress led to stronger changes in negative emotions than vice versa, and negative emotions led to stronger changes in affiliations with deviant companions than vice versa. This result would not have emerged if common method variance among the study constructs was responsible for our findings.

Most research on the effects of life stress and risk behavior has focused on populations in densely populated inner cities. African Americans, however, grow up in diverse communities. The present study was conducted with African American families who resided in nonmetropolitan areas that were far less densely populated than urban settings. Life stress, including racial discrimination, is as likely to operate in small or moderately sized communities as in large urban areas. Regardless of population size or rural-urban location, when emerging adults experience chronic life stress, challenges to their health and well-being increase.

Limitations of this study and some caveats must be noted. First, the exclusion of youth who dropped out of school from the sampling list potentially limits the study’s generalizability. Mean dropout rates for African American students across the sampled counties, however, are uniformly low; fewer than 5% of students in the sampled area dropped out of school in any particular year (The Governor's Office of Student Achievement, 2009). Thus, the results are generalizable to the vast majority of rural African Americans in these areas. Second, it is not known whether the present results generalize to White, Hispanic, or Asian families living in the same communities as the study participants or to urban families of any race. Third, although the sample is representative of African American emerging adults living in rural Georgia (Boatright & Bachtel, 2005), it is nevertheless possible that the families who took part in this study, due to self-selection processes, may have been functioning differently than the population at large. Finally, the proposed cascade model is not intended to be exhaustive. Models that incorporate different parameters than those included here could also account for variation in risk behavior increases. For example, the inclusion of perceptions about the social acceptability of risk behaviors might yield a more robust model. These cautions notwithstanding, the present results add to the literature by documenting the cascade of processes that connect life stress to increases in risk behavior among African American emerging adults living in the rural South.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Awards Numbers 5R01DA019230-04 and 1P30DA027827-01 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. Achenbach TM, Howell CT, McConaughy SH, Stanger C. Six-year predictors of problems in a national sample: IV. Young adult signs of disturbance. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1998;37:718–727. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199807000-00011. doi:10.1097/00004583-199807000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agnew R. Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology. 1992;30:47–87. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01093.x. [Google Scholar]
  3. Allison KR, Adlaf EM, Mates D. Life strain, coping and substance use among high school students. Addiction Research. 1997;5:251–272. doi:10.3109/16066359709005265. [Google Scholar]
  4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aquilino WS. From adolescent to young adult: A prospective study of parent-child relations during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1997;59:670–686. doi:10.2307/353953. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aseltine RH, Jr, Gore SL. The variable effects of stress on alcohol use from adolescence to early adulthood. Substance Use and Misuse. 2000;35:643–668. doi: 10.3109/10826080009148415. doi:10.3109/10826080009148415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Aseltine RH, Jr, Gore SL, Gordon J. Life stress, anger and anxiety, and delinquency: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2000;41:256–275. doi:10.2307/2676320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumeister RF, Scher SJ. Self-defeating behavior patterns among normal individuals: Review and analysis of common self-destructive tendencies. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;104:3–22. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.3. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beach SRH, Kogan SM, Brody GH, Chen Y-F, Lei M-K, Murry VM. Change in caregiver depression as a function of the Strong African American Families program. Journal of Family Psychology. 2008;22:241–252. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.241. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.22.2.241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Belle D. Lives in stress: Women and depression. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1982. [Google Scholar]
  11. Berkowitz L. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin. 1989;106:59–73. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boatright SR, Bachtel DC. The Georgia county guide. 24th ed. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  13. Brody GH, Beach SRH, Philibert RA, Chen Y-f, Lei M-K, Murry VM, Brown AC. Parenting moderates a genetic vulnerability factor in longitudinal increases in youths’ substance use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2009;77:1–11. doi: 10.1037/a0012996. doi:10.1037/a0012996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brody GH, Chen Y-f, Beach SRH, Philibert RA, Kogan SM. Participation in a family-centered prevention program decreases genetic risk for adolescents’ risky behaviors. Pediatrics. 2009;124:911–917. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3464. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brody GH, Kogan SM, Chen Y-f, Smith K, Brown AC. Resilience effects of a family-based preventive intervention on African American emerging adults. 2009 doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00774.x. Manuscript submitted for publication. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brody GH, Chen Y-f, Murry VM, Ge X, Simons RL, Gibbons FX, Cutrona CE. Perceived discrimination and the adjustment of African American youths: A five-year longitudinal analysis with contextual moderation effects. Child Development. 2006;77:1170–1189. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00927.x. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brody GH, Flor DL, Hollett-Wright N, McCoy JK. Children's development of alcohol use norms: Contributions of parent and sibling norms, children's temperaments, and parent-child discussions. Journal of Family Psychology. 1998;12:209–219. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.12.2.209. [Google Scholar]
  18. Brody GH, Kogan SM, Chen Y-f, Murry VM. Long-term effects of the Strong African American Families program on youths’ conduct problems. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2008;43(5):474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.016. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Brody GH, Murry VM, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, McNair LD, Brown AC, Chen Y-f. The Strong African American Families Program: Prevention of youths' high-risk behavior and a test of a model of change. Journal of Family Psychology. 2006;20:1–11. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.1. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brody GH, Murry VM, Gerrard M, Gibbons FX, Molgaard V, McNair LD, Neubaum-Carlan E. The Strong African American Families program: Translating research into prevention programming. Child Development. 2004;75:900–917. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00713.x. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00713.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Brook JS, Adams RE, Balka EB, Whiteman M, Zhang C, Sugerman R. Illicit drug use and risky sexual behavior among African American and Puerto Rican urban adolescents: The longitudinal links. Journal of Genetic Psychology. 2004;165:203–220. doi:10.3200/GNTP.165.3.310-323. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cairns RB, Cairns BD. Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  23. Capaldi DM. Co-occurrence of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early adolescent boys: II. A 2-year follow-up at grade 8. Development and Psychopathology. 1992;3:277–300. doi: 10.1017/s0954579499001959. doi:10.1017/S0954579400005605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Caspi A, Herbener ES. Continuity and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;58:250–258. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.2.250. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Caspi A, Herbener ES. Marital assortment and phenotypic convergence: Longitudinal evidence. Social Biology. 1993;40(1/2):48–60. doi: 10.1080/19485565.1993.9988835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Castro FG, Maddahian E, Newcomb MD, Bentler PM. A multivariate model of the determinants of cigarette smoking among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1987;28:273–289. doi:10.2307/2136846. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Chatterji P. Illicit drug use and educational attainment. Health Economics. 2006;15:489–511. doi: 10.1002/hec.1085. doi:10.1002/hec.1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cicchetti D, Schneider-Rosen K. Toward a transactional model of childhood depression. New Directions for Child Development. 1984;26:5–27. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cicchetti D, Tucker D. Development and self-regulatory structures of the mind. Development and Psychopathology. 1994;6:533–549. doi:10.1017/S0954579400004673. [Google Scholar]
  30. Connell AM, Dishion TJ. The contribution of peers to monthly variation in adolescent depressed mood: A short-term longitudinal study with time-varying predictors. Development and Psychopathology. 2006;18:139–154. doi: 10.1017/S0954579406060081. doi:10.1017/S0954579406060081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Cooper ML, Shapiro CM, Powers AM. Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75:1528–1558. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1528. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Daley SE, Hammen C. Depressive symptoms and close relationships during the transition to adulthood: Perspectives from dysphoric women, their best friends, and their romantic partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2002;70:129–141. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.1.129. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dishion TJ, Eddy JM, Haas E, Li F, Spracklen KM. Friendships and violent behavior during adolescence. Social Development. 1997;6:207–223. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.1997.tb00102.x. [Google Scholar]
  34. Dishion TJ, McCord J, Poulin F. When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist. 1999;54:755–764. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.9.755. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.9 .755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Dishion TJ, Spracklen KM, Andrews DW, Patterson GR. Deviancy training in male adolescents’ friendships. Behavior Therapy. 1996;27:373–390. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80023-2. [Google Scholar]
  36. Duncan SC, Duncan TE, Strycker LA. Alcohol use from ages 9 to 16: A cohort-sequential latent growth model. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2006;81:71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.06.001. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. DuRant RH, Smith JA, Kreiter SR, Krowchuk DP. The relationship between early age of onset of initial substance use and engaging in multiple health risk behaviors among young adolescents. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. 1999;153:286–291. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.3.286. Retrieved from http://archpedi.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/153/3/286. [DOI] [PubMed]
  38. Elliott DS, Ageton SS, Huizinga D. Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Siegel; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  39. Engfer A, Walper S, Rutter ML. Individual characteristics as a force in development. In: Rutter ML, Hay D, editors. Development through life: A handbook for clinicians. Oxford, UK: Blackwell; 1994. pp. 79–111. [Google Scholar]
  40. Folkman S, Chesney MA, Pollack L, Phillips C. Stress, coping, and high-risk sexual behavior. Health Psychology. 1992;11:218–222. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.11.4.218. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.11.4.218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Furman W, Escudero H. The role of developmental context in romantic relationships; San Francisco, CA: Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  42. Ge X, Conger RD, Lorenz FO, Simons RL. Parents' stressful life events and adolescent depressed mood. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1994;35:28–44. doi:10.2307/2137333. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M. Predicting young adults’ health risk behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69:505–517. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.3.505. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.3.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Cleveland MJ, Wills TA, Brody GH. Perceived discrimination and substance use in African American parents and their children: A panel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;86:517–529. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.517. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Glueck S, Glueck E. Unraveling juvenile delinquency. Oxford, UK: Commonwealth Fund; 1950. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gore SL, Aseltine RH., Jr Racial and ethnic differences in depressed mood following the transition form high school. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2003;44:370–390. doi:10.2307/1519785. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Graham S, Taylor AZ, Hudley C. Exploring achievement values among ethnic minority early adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1998;90:606–620. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.606. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hall HI, Li J, McKenna MT. HIV in predominantly rural areas of the United States. Journal of Rural Health. 2005;21:245–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00090.x. doi:10.1111/j.1748-0361.2005.tb00090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hammen C. Risk and protective factors for children of depressed parents. In: Luthar SS, editor. Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hartung CM, McCarthy DM, Milich R, Martin CA. Parent-adolescent agreement on disruptive behavior symptoms: A multitrait-multimethod model. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2005;27:159–168. doi:10.1007/s10862-005-0632-8. [Google Scholar]
  51. He K, Kramer E, Houser RF, Hacker KA, Chomitz VR. Defining and understanding healthy lifestyles choices for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2004;35:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.004. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Holz VJ, Tienda M. Education and employment in a diverse society: Generating inequality through the school to work transition. In: Denton N, Tolnay S, editors. American diversity: A demographic challenge for the twenty-first century. Albany, NY: SUNY Press; 1998. pp. 249–281. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kendler KS, Walters EE, Neale MC, Kessler RC. The structure of the genetic and environmental risk factors for six major psychiatric disorders in women: Phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, bulimia, major depression, and alcoholism. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1995;52:374–383. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950170048007. Retrieved from http://archpsyc.ama-assn.org/content/vol52/issue5/index.dtl. [DOI] [PubMed]
  54. Kogan SM, Berkel C, Chen Y-F, Brody GH, Murry VM. Metro status and African-American adolescents' risk for substance use. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2006;38:454–457. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.05.024. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Lahey BB, Schwab-Stone M, Goodman SH, Waldman ID, Canino G, Rathouz PJ, Jensen PS. Age and gender differences in oppositional behavior and conduct problems: A cross-sectional household study of middle childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2000;109:488–503. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.109.3.488. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Martin JK, Tuch SA, Roman PM. Problem drinking patterns among African Americans: The impacts of reports of discrimination, perceptions of prejudice, and "risky" coping strategies. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2003;44:408–425. doi:10.2307/1519787. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Masten AS, Coatsworth JD. The development of competence in favorable and unfavorable environments: Lessons from research on successful children. American Psychologist. 1998;53:205–220. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.53.2.205. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Masten AS, Roisman GI, Long JD, Burt KB, Obradović J, Riley JR, Tellegen A. Developmental cascades: Linking academic achievement and externalizing and internalizing symptoms over 20 years. Developmental Psychology. 2005;41:733–746. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.733. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Meeus W, Branje S, Overbeek GJ. Parents and partners in crime: A six-year longitudinal study on changes in supportive relationships and delinquency in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2004;45:1288–1298. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00312.x. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Milhausen RR, Crosby R, Yarber WL, DiClemente RJ, Wingood GM, Ding K. Rural and nonrural African American high school students and STD/HIV sexual-risk behaviors. American Journal of Health Behavior. 2003;27:373–379. doi: 10.5993/ajhb.27.4.9. Retrieved from http://www.atypon-link.com/PNG/doi/pdf/10.5555/ajhb.2003.27.4.373. [DOI] [PubMed]
  61. Pascoe EA, Smart Richman L. Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 2009;135:531–554. doi: 10.1037/a0016059. doi:10.1037/a0016059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Patrick DL, Cheadle A, Thompson DC, Diehr P, Koepsell T, Kinne S. The validity of self-reported smoking: A review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84:1086–1093. doi: 10.2105/ajph.84.7.1086. doi:10.2105/AJPH.84.7.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Patterson GR, Reid JB, Dishion TJ. A social learning approach: IV. Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  64. Patton GC, Hibbert M, Rosier MJ, Carlin JB, Caust J, Bowes G. Is smoking associated with depression and anxiety in teenagers? American Journal of Public Health. 1996;86:225–230. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.2.225. doi:10.2105/AJPH.86.2.225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pearlin LI. The sociological study of stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1989;30:241–256. doi:10.2307/2136956. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Pearlin LI, Aneshensel CS, Leblanc AJ. The forms and mechanisms of stress proliferation: The case of AIDS caregivers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1997;38:223–236. doi:10.2307/2955368. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Pearlin LI, Schieman S, Fazio EM, Meersman SC. Stress, health, and the life course: Some conceptual perspectives. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2005;46:205–219. doi: 10.1177/002214650504600206. doi:10.1177/002214650504600206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Proctor BD, Dalaker J. Poverty in the United States: 2002 (Current Population Reports Series P60–222) Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  69. Pumariega AJ, Johnson NP, Sheridan D, Cuffe SP. The influence of race and gender on depressive and substance abuse symptoms in high-risk adolescents. Cultural Diversity and Mental Health. 1996;2:115–123. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.2.2.115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Quinton D, Pickles A, Maughan B, Rutter ML. Partners, peers, and pathways: Assortative pairing and continuities in conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology. 1993;5:763–783. doi:10.1017/S0954579400006271. [Google Scholar]
  71. Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1977;1:385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306. [Google Scholar]
  72. Rutter ML, Maughan B, Meyer J, Pickles A, Silberg J, Simonoff E, Taylor E. Heterogeneity of antisocial behavior: Causes, continuities, and consequences. In: Osgood DW, editor. Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 44. Motivation and delinquency. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press; 1996. pp. 45–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sieving RE, Perry CL, Williams CL. Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents' alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2000;26:27–35. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00056-7. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(99)00056-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Simons RL, Chen Y-f, Stewart EA, Brody GH. Incidents of discrimination and risk for delinquency: A longitudinal test of strain theory with an African American sample. Justice Quarterly. 2003;20:827–854. doi:10.1080/07418820300095711. [Google Scholar]
  75. Simons RL, Murry VM, McLoyd VC, Lin K-H, Cutrona CE, Conger RD. Discrimination, crime, ethnic identity, and parenting as correlates of depressive symptoms among African American children: A multilevel analysis. Development and Psychopathology. 2002;14:371–393. doi: 10.1017/s0954579402002109. doi:10.1017/S0954579402002109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Simons RL, Stewart EA, Gordon LC, Conger RD, Elder GH., Jr A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology. 2002;40:401–434. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00961.x. [Google Scholar]
  77. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  78. Spielberger CD. State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory 2: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  79. The Governor's Office of Student Achievement. 2007–2008 annual report card on K-12 public schools. 2009 Retrieved from http://www.gaosa.org.
  80. Turner RJ, Russell D, Glover R, Hutto P. The social antecedents of anger proneness in young adulthood. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2007;48:68–83. doi: 10.1177/002214650704800105. doi:10.1177/002214650704800105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Unger JB, Hamilton JE, Sussman S. A family member's job loss as a risk factor for smoking among adolescents. Health Psychology. 2004;23:308–313. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.308. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.3.308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Vanyukov MM, Neale MC, Moss HB, Tarter RE. Mating assortment and the liability to substance abuse. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1996;42:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(96)01255-0. doi:10.1016/0376-8716(96)01255-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Werner EE, Smith RS. Journeys from childhood to midlife: Risk, resilience, and recovery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Whalen CK, Jamner LD, Henker B, Delfino RJ. Smoking and moods in adolescents with depressive and aggressive dispositions: Evidence from surveys and electronic diaries. Health Psychology. 2001;20:99–111. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.2.99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Wills TA, Filer M. Stress-coping model of adolescent substance use. In: Ollendick TH, Prinz RJ, editors. Advances in clinical child psychology. Vol. 18. New York: Plenum Press; 1996. pp. 91–132. [Google Scholar]
  86. Windle M, Mun EY, Windle RC. Adolescent-to-young adult heavy drinking trajectories and their prospective predictors. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 2005;66:313–322. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2005.66.313. Retrieved from http://www.jsad.com/jsad/downloadarticle/AdolescenttoYoung_Adulthood_Heavy_Drinking_Trajectories_and_Their_Prospec/1094.pdf. [DOI] [PubMed]
  87. W. T. Grant Foundation. The forgotten half: Non-college bound youth in America. Washington, DC: Author; 1989. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES