Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Transplant Proc. 1989 Feb;21(1 Pt 2):2445–2446.

Liver Transplantation for Hereditary Tyrosinemia in the Presence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Carlos O Esquivel 1, Luis Mieles 1, Ignazio R Marino 1, Satoru Todo 1, Leonard Makowka 1, Giovanni Ambrosino 1, Paul Nakazato 1, Thomas E Starzl 1
PMCID: PMC2903894  NIHMSID: NIHMS186073  PMID: 2540570

Hereditary tyrosinemia is a metabolic disorder characterized by deficiency of the enzyme fummarylacetoacetate, resulting in the accumulation of tyrosine metabolites, which are toxic to the liver. Hepatic dysfunction, associated with tyrosinemia, varies from an acute form of liver failure to a chronic, progressive form that leads to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).1,2

Liver transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage hepatic disease brought about by several metabolic disorders, including tyrosinemia. Liver replacement has also been offered to patients with primary hepatic malignancies.3 Despite the fact that liver transplantation cures the underlying metabolic defect in patients with tyrosinemia,4 little is known about the proper timing for transplantation in such patients and the potential consequences of replacing the liver in the presence of HCC.

The purpose of this investigation is to report our experience with hepatic transplantation for tyrosinemia in the presence of HCC.

Patients and Methods

Between March 1980 and December 1987, 1043 patients underwent liver transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh. Ten patients received 11 liver transplants for tyrosinemia. Nine were children (less than 18 years of age), and one was a 21-year-old adult. The records of these 10 patients were carefully reviewed, and the following information was obtained: demographic data, biochemical/histologic analysis for tyrosinemia, location of tumor, vascular invasion, recurrence, and survival in months. Liver function tests and the patient's quality of life at the time of last follow-up were also recorded. In each case, a diagnosis of tyrosinemia was made based on the clinical findings, the presence of elevated plasma and urine tyrosine, phenylalanine, and methionine, and the presence of succinylacetone in the urine.

Results

Five of the 10 patients had HCC at the time of transplantation, with follow-up ranging from five months to 78 months (Table 1). One patient died of recurrence of malignant disease five months following transplantation, with widespread metastases involving the hepatic allograft, lungs, bones, and brain. This patient had HCC involving the right lobe, with invasion of the portal and hepatic veins. The other four patients are alive and free of recurrence (median 56, ranging from 42 to 78 months). At the time of the last follow-up, these four patients had normal liver function tests. Three are performing well at school, and one is working full time.

Table 1. Clinical Features of Five Liver Transplant Recipients for Tyrosinemia and HCC.

Case No. Age at OLT (yr) Indication for OLT Location Survival (mo) Follow-up
1 Hepatoma Both lobes 78 School, normal LFTs
2 21 Liver failure p resection for HCC Right lobe 56 Working, normal LFTs
3 Cirrhosis + suspected hepatoma Both lobes 48 School, normal LFTs
4 3 Cirrhosis Both lobes 42 School, normal LFTs
5 51112 Hepatoma Right lobe 5 Recurrence

Note: HCC - Hepatocellular carcinoma; OLT - Orthotopic liver transplantation; LFTs - Liver function tests

All five patients with HCC were older than two years of age. Three of the 10 patients were under two years of age, and although their excised livers showed severe dysplasia, none had HCC. Nine patients had markedly elevated alphafetoprotein. This information was not available in one patient.

Discussion

Liver transplantation is an effective mode of therapy for patients with liver disease secondary to inborn errors of the metabolism, but the results have been disappointing when the indication for transplantation is HCC due to the high recurrence rate.5,6 Most of the recurrences seem to occur within the first year following transplantation. On the other hand, the recurrence rate is almost nonexistent in patients with HCC in whom the main indication for transplantation is an underlying nonmalignant liver disease, such as cirrhosis.6 This is probably the result of tumor involvement, since in the former group, the tumor is usually so extensive that a conventional subtotal hepatectomy is not possible, whereas in the latter group, resection of the tumor would be possible, if the underlying liver parenchyma was normal. However, in the present study, the extent of tumor involvement of the liver did not seem to have any prognostic significance, since four patients with bilateral involvement of the liver have had no evidence of recurrence thus far.

Interestingly, the patient with tumor confined to the right lobe of the liver died of recurrence shortly after transplantation. Unlike the other cases, this particular patient had extensive invasion of the portal and hepatic veins.

The proper timing for hepatic replacement in patients with tyrosinemia is a topic of confusion among pediatricians and surgeons. Careful consideration should be given to patients older than two years of age, since the incidence of HCC increases considerably beyond that age.7 The follow-up on these patients is particularly difficult, since the alphafetoprotein is usually elevated and the presence of nodules makes it difficult for the radiologist to distinguish between a benign regenerative nodule and malignancy.

In conclusion, the presence of hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis due to hereditary tyrosinemia is not a contraindication for liver transplantation.

Acknowledgments

Supported by research grants from the Veterans Administration and Project Grant no. AM 29961 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

References

  • 1.Kvittigen EA. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1986;184(Suppl):27. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Weinberg AG, Mize CE, Worthen HE. J Pediatr. 1976;88:434. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(76)80259-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Starzl TE, Iwatsuki S, Van Thiel DH, et al. Hepatology. 1982;2:614. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Starzl TE, Zitelli BJ, Shaw BW, Jr, et al. J Pediatr. 1985;106:604. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80081-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Esquivel CO, Marino IR, Fioravanti V, Van Thiel DH. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1988;17:167. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Esquivel CO, Iwatsuki S, Gordon RD, Starzl TE. In: Hepatic and Biliary Cancer: Surgical and Clinical Management. Wanebo H, editor. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1986. pp. 477–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mieles LA, Esquivel CO, Makowka L, et al: (submitted for publication)

RESOURCES