Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2010 Jun 7;61(12):3235–3244. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq145

Interference with oxidative phosphorylation enhances anoxic expression of rice α-amylase genes through abolishing sugar regulation

Minji Park 1, Hui-kyeong Yim 1, Hyeok-gon Park 1, Jun Lim 1, Soo-Hwan Kim 2, Yong-sic Hwang 1,*
PMCID: PMC2905192  PMID: 20530196

Abstract

Rice has the unique ability to express α-amylase under anoxic conditions, a feature that is critical for successful anaerobic germination and growth. Previously, anaerobic conditions were shown to up-regulate the expression of Amy3 subfamily genes (Amy3B/C, 3D, and 3E) in rice embryos. These genes are known to be feedback regulated by the hydrolytic products of starchy endosperm such as the simple sugar glucose. It was found that oxygen deficiency interferes with the repression of Amy3D gene expression imposed by low concentrations of glucose but not with that imposed by higher amounts. This differential anoxic de-repression depending on sugar concentration suggests the presence of two distinct pathways for sugar regulation of Amy3D gene expression. Anoxic de-repression can be mimicked by treating rice embryos with inhibitors of ATP synthesis during respiration. Other sugar-regulated rice α-amylase genes, Amy3B/C and 3E, behave similarly to Amy3D. Treatment with a respiratory inhibitor or anoxia also relieved the sugar repression of the rice CIPK15 gene, a main upstream positive regulator of SnRK1A that is critical for Amy3D expression in response to sugar starvation. SnRK1A accumulation was previously shown to be required for MYBS1 expression, which transactivates Amy3D by binding to a cis-acting element found in the proximal region of all Amy3 subfamily gene promoters (the TA box). Taken together, these results suggest that prevention of oxidative phosphorylation by oxygen deficiency interferes with the sugar repression of Amy3 subfamily gene expression, leading to their enhanced expression in rice embryos during anaerobic germination.

Keywords: α-Amylase, anaerobic germination, anoxia, oxidative phosphorylation, sugar signalling

Introduction

Rice (Oryza sativa) is the only cereal that has the ability to germinate and grow while submerged, a characteristic observed in only a few plant species (Perata et al., 1997). Anaerobic tolerance in plants is known to be closely associated with the maintenance of energy metabolism (Webb and Armstrong, 1983; Ricard et al., 1991). Therefore, a sufficient supply of metabolizable sugars is probably very important for the embryonic axis of submerged rice seedlings to overcome the low energetic efficiency of fermentation. Since only limited amounts of metabolizable sugars are present in pre-germinated seeds, mobilization of the starchy endosperm is critical to support the growth of non-photosynthetic embryonic tissues.

One of the features clearly distinguishing rice from other cereals is its ability to mobilize endosperm starch under anaerobic conditions (Guglielminetti et al., 1995a, b). The importance of sugar availability has been demonstrated in anaerobic germination. For example, the inability of wheat seeds to undergo anaerobic germination and the very stunted anaerobic growth of rice CIPK15 knockout mutants are related to their inability to mobilize endospermal starch under anoxia, because exogenous supplementation with glucose or sucrose rescues these plants under anoxic conditions (Perata et al., 1993; Lee et al., 2009). Therefore, even though the ability to undergo germination and post-germinative growth under anaerobic conditions is likely to be the result of many physiological and biochemical processes, the ability to mobilize starch anaerobically is essential for the growth of anoxia-tolerant cereals such as rice.

α-Amylase initiates the breakdown of intact starch granules from the endosperm, releasing glucose polymers in the form of amylose and amylopectin, which can be further digested by various hydrolases into soluble sugars. These sugars are mobilized to the embryonic axis, where they are utilized as carbon and energy sources for shoot and root apical meristems that differentiate and grow to become the seedling. Therefore, by controlling the rate of mobilization of the starchy endosperm, α-amylase plays a critical role in the germination process (Bewley and Black, 1994). Rice α-amylases are encoded by 10 separate genes belonging to three subfamilies (Amy1, 2, and 3) (Huang et al., 1990). Rice α-amylase gene expression during aerobic germination has been well characterized. For example, the analyses of steady-state mRNA levels and in situ hybridization have shown that the expression of each member of the α-amylase multigene family is spatially and temporally regulated during aerobic germination and seedling growth (Karrer et al., 1991; Hwang et al., 1999). All genes of the Amy1 and 2 subfamilies of rice appear to be under phytohormonal control because the cis-acting gibberellic acid (GA) response element (GARE; 5′TAACAG/AA3′) is conserved in their promoters (unpublished data). In fact, transcription of Amy1A, a major α-amylase, is positively stimulated by GA, and this action is antagonized by abscisic acid (ABA) (O'Neill et al., 1990; Itoh et al., 1995). In contrast, all promoters of Amy3 subfamily genes lack the GARE, suggesting that their regulation is independent of GA/ABA control (unpublished data). In fact, Amy3D promoter activity in isolated embryos does not increase in response to exogenous GA (Karrer and Rodriguez, 1992). Instead, Amy3 subfamily genes are under sugar regulation in which their expression is strongly induced in the absence of sugars but is repressed by various sugars produced during endosperm mobilization (Karrer and Rodriguez, 1992; Yu et al., 1992; Thomas and Rodriguez, 1994). This can explain the transitory expression pattern of Amy3 subfamily genes in scutellar tissue during aerobic germination (Hwang et al., 1999). For example, in the initial stage of aerobic germination, Amy3D is expressed because no sugar is available around the embryo, but as endosperm starch is mobilized during the germination process, the increasing amount of sugars around the embryo inhibits Amy3D expression. Intriguingly, this transitory expression pattern of Amy3 subfamily genes disappears during anaerobic germination (Hwang et al., 1999). For example, steady-state levels of Amy3B/C, 3D, and 3E increase by the fourth day and are sustained to the sixth day during anaerobic germination, instead of rapidly disappearing after 1 d in aerobic conditions. Sustained high expression of Amy3 subfamily genes during anaerobic conditions appears to be very important for anaerobic endosperm mobilization, since their relative contribution to α-amylase production becomes much greater (Perata et al., 1997). In addition to rice seeds, rice anoxic coleoptiles also showed strong induction of the Amy3D gene in an RNA profiling study (Lasanthi-Kudahettige et al., 2007). Very little is known, however, about the ability of rice to express α-amylase under anaerobic conditions.

In this study, the correlation between sugar regulation of Amy3 subfamily genes (including Amy3D) and their sustained high expression in a limited oxygen environment was investigated. The data demonstrate that sugar regulation of Amy3 subfamily gene expression is modulated by oxygen availability. For example, various respiration inhibitors as well as anaerobic growth conditions allow the expression of Amy3 subfamily genes even in the presence of glucose. These data indicate that inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation interferes with the repression of Amy3 subfamily gene expression by the sugars produced during germination, probably through de-repression of CIPK15 expression, resulting in augmented expression during anaerobic germination

Materials and methods

Rice whole seed and rice embryo treatments

Whole rice seeds (Oryza sativa L. cv. Dongjin) or rice embryos manually dissected from the seed with a razor blade were surface sterilized as described in Hwang et al. (2005).

For aerobic germination, 70–100 sterilized whole seeds were placed on three layers of 3MM Whatman paper soaked with 10 mM CaCl2 solution. For anoxic treatment, the same amount of seeds was submerged in 10 mM CaCl2 solution under N2 gas. Rice embryos were harvested from whole seeds on the indicated days, frozen with liquid N2, and used for extraction of total RNA.

For embryo experiments, 70–100 manually dissected rice embryos were incubated on three layers of 3MM Whatman paper soaked with 10 mM CaCl2 containing glucose or another sugar at the indicated concentration. For anoxic treatment, ∼70–100 embryos were submerged in 10 mM CaCl2 solution under N2 gas, either with or without glucose at the indicated concentration as described above. The molarity of sugar was adjusted to be the same for all experiments by supplementing with mannitol.

Chemical treatments

Sodium azide (NaN3) and 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Korea (Yongin, Korea).

Rice suspension cultures

Suspension-cultured rice cells (O. sativa L. cv. Dongjin) were kindly provided by Jong-Seong Jeon's lab in Kyung Hee University (Yongin, Korea). The suspension-cultured cells were maintained in AA2 culture medium (Thompson et al., 1986) and subcultured every 10 d by transferring ∼3–5 ml packed volume of the cells to 20 ml of fresh AA2 medium and actively shaking at 150 rpm, 28 °C in the dark. For any chemical treatment, 5-day-old cells of subcultures were washed twice with AA2 without glucose and then transferred to a flask containing 20 ml of AA2 medium with various sugars or other chemicals. Flasks were shaken at 150 rpm, 28 °C in the dark. For anoxic treatment, cells were transferred to flasks under N2 gas containing 20 ml of AA2 medium with various sugars and other chemicals, and incubated at 28 °C without shaking in the dark.

RNA analysis

Total RNA was isolated from harvested rice embryos by grinding with a mortar and pestle in liquid N2. The finely ground powder was dissolved in 6 ml of TLE/SDS buffer (0.18 M TRIS, 0.09 M LiCl, 4.5 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, pH 8.2), vortexed vigorously, and incubated on ice for 10 min. The same volume of TLE-buffered phenol and chloroform was added and it was vigorously vortexed and placed on ice for 30 min. Nucleic acids were recovered by ethanol precipitation and then dissolved in 1 ml of RNase-free H2O. Total RNA was specifically separated from DNA and other contaminants by the TRI Reagent from Molecular Research Center, Inc. (Cincinnati, OH, USA). RNA was precipitated with 100% ethanol and its concentration was determined spectrophotometrically. A 25 μg aliquot of total RNA was size-fractionated through a 1% formaldehyde–agarose gel, blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ, USA), and exposed to UV light of 1200 kJ/cm2 to fix the RNA to the membrane.

A probe specific for the Amy3D gene was prepared by PCR using a primer set (Table 1) that primarily amplifies the 3′-untranslated region (UTR) of the Amy3D gene, using Amy3D cDNA (pOS137) as a template (O'Neill et al., 1990). The probe was labelled non-radioactively using a digoxigenin (DIG) non-radioisotope labelling protocol (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). The specificity of this Amy3D probe has been previously demonstrated (Hwang et al., 1999). PCR was carried out using a thermal controller (PTC-100; MJ Research, Waterdown, MA, USA) with a 2 min pre-denaturing step at 95 °C followed by 30 cycles of amplification, with a 30 s denaturing step at 95 °C, a 30 s annealing step at 55 °C, and a 2 min extension step at 72 °C. The final extension step was 5 min at 72 °C.

Table 1.

List of the primers used in this study

Target gene Primer sequence
DIG labelling Amy3D FW 5′-CGGGATAGTCATGCTCAAACCAG-3′
RV 5′-GATTTTTTACTGCATCCTGAACCTG-3′
qPCR Amy3D FW 5′-GTAGGCAGGCTCTCTAGCCTCTAGG-3′
RV 5′-GATTTTTTACTGCATCCTGAACCTG-3′
Amy3B/C FW 5′-AGCAAGCTGAAAATCCTTGCTGCTGA-3′
RV 5′-TAATTGTTGCCGTGAGCAACGACATG-3′
Amy3E FW 5′-AGGAAGGCCTCAGGGTTCCTGCCGGT-3′
RV 5′-TCTCGCAGCAAAATTGCATGAT-3′
CIPK15 FW 5′-TAAGCCTTCAAAATTCTTCG-3′
RV 5′-TATAAACAAAACCAGGACTC-3′
Actin FW 5′-ATGAAGATCAAGGTGGTCGC-3′
RV 5′ GTACTCAGCCTTGGCAATCC-3′
Open in a new tab

Pre-hybridization of the membrane was performed for 5 h in Ultrahyb solution (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) at 42 °C. Hybridization was started by adding the heat-denatured DIG-labelled probe to the pre-hybridization solution and was performed overnight. Washing and detection were performed using the DIG Wash and Block buffer set from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany) as described in the company's recommended protocol.

Quantitative real-time PCR

First-strand cDNA was synthesized with 1 μg of total RNA using a Maxim kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea) and an oligo(dT) primer. Real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out using the Mx3000P™ Real-time PCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Detection of real-time RT-PCR products was done by staining with SYBR Green (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) following the manufacturer's recommendations. A 1 μg aliquot of first-strand cDNA was used as the template for PCR. The PCR cycling conditions were 40 cycles after a 10 min pre-denaturing step at 95 °C, with a 30 s denaturing step at 95 °C, a 1 min annealing step at 60 °C, and a 1 min extension step at 72 °C. The final extension step was 5 min at 72 °C. The relative quantification method was used to evaluate quantitative variation between the triplicates examined. The relative amplification of the rice actin gene was used as an internal control to normalize all data. The gene-specific primers used for quantitative PCR are listed in Table 1.

Respiration rate measurement

The respiration rate of suspension-cultured rice cells was determined by an oxygen electrode (Rank Brothers, Cambridge, UK) using 1 ml of medium containing ∼200 μl packed volume of cells. The total protein concentration was measured by the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976).

ATP measurement

The concentration of ATP present in each of the samples was determined using a bioluminescent detection reagent (ENLITEN rLuciferase/Luciferin; Promega). Suspension-cultured cells (200 μl packed volume) were ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid N2, resuspended in 800 μl of grinding buffer (100 mm KH2PO4 at pH 7.8, 1 mm EDTA, 7 mm β-mercaptoethanol), vortexed, spun down quickly at 14 000 pm for 5 min, and the supernatant was used for the assay. A 100 μl aliquot of luciferase/luciferin reagent was added to 10 μl of the sample and luminescence was measured by a luminometer (Tuner Biosystems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) using a 10 s integration. The amount of ATP present in the sample was calculated from the measured relative light units (RLU) using a standard curve. The total protein amount contained in the sample was determined by the Bradford method (Bradford, 1976).

Results

Anoxic conditions perturb the sugar regulation of Amy3D in the embryo, causing a sustained increase in its expression

Since there is some variation in the anoxic responses of different rice varieties (Magneschi et al., 2009), the anoxic induction of Amy3D was first examined in the embryos of intact germinating seeds of Dongjin, a variety that was used in the experiments. Amy3D expression was examined in rice embryos dissected from aerobically or anaerobically germinating seeds on the indicated days of germination (Fig. 1A). In embryos from aerobically germinated seeds, Amy3D was weakly and transiently expressed. For example, its expression was detectable from day 1 of germination until day 2, and became undetectable by the fourth day of germination. The expression level of Amy3D from intact seeds was much lower than that from pre-isolated embryos without sugar (Fig. 1B), suggestive of tight sugar regulation by sugars newly released from endosperm digestion or pre-existing sugars around the embryo in intact seeds. In contrast, in the embryos of anaerobically germinated seeds, Amy3D expression increased prominently at day 1, and it continued at least to the fourth day of germination when no Amy3D transcripts were detectable from aerobically germinated seeds.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Open in a new tab

Modulation of Amy3D expression by oxygen availability. (A) Expression of Amy3D in rice embryos during aerobic or anaerobic germination. For aerobic germination, rice seeds were placed on Whatman paper layers soaked with 10 mM CaCl2 solution at 28 °C in the dark. For anoxic treatment, rice seeds were submerged in 10 mM CaCl2 solution under N2 gas at 28 °C in the dark. The presence or absence of O2 is indicated as + or –. After germinating in the presence or absence of oxygen, rice embryos were harvested at the indicated times from whole seeds and subsequently frozen with liquid N2. The transcript levels of Amy3D were examined from total RNA isolated from frozen tissues by using a probe specific to the 3′ UTR. The total amount of RNA loaded is indicated by rRNA stained with ethidium bromide. (B) Effect of anoxia on the sugar regulation of Amy3D expression in isolated rice embryos. Amy3D mRNA levels were examined in pre-isolated embryos incubated in various concentrations of glucose (0–330 mM) under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. For aerobic treatment, rice embryos were first manually dissected from whole seeds with a razor blade and incubated on Whatman paper layers soaked with 10 mM CaCl2 containing glucose at the indicated concentrations. For anoxic treatment, rice embryos were submerged in 10 mM CaCl2 solution at the same glucose concentrations as described above. The total sugar molarity was adjusted to be the same for all experiments by supplementing with mannitol. The presence or absence of O2 is indicated as + or –. The transcript levels of Amy3D were detected as described above. The total amount of RNA loaded is indicated by rRNA stained with ethidium bromide.

Since Amy3D expression, which is repressible by sugars, was enhanced and sustained in anaerobic conditions, experiments were carried out to investigate whether the sugar regulation of Amy3D gene expression was influenced by oxygen deficiency. Pre-isolated rice embryos were incubated in different amounts of sugar in the presence or absence of oxygen for 1 d, and the steady-state levels of Amy3D mRNA were examined (Fig. 1B). In aerobic conditions, the expression of Amy3D was primarily controlled by the sugar level; it was strongly expressed in the absence of sugar and repressed in its presence. Surprisingly, anaerobic conditions were able to interfere significantly with this sugar regulation pattern. Anoxic conditions abolished the repression of Amy3D expression imposed by the presence of glucose at concentrations <80 mM, though it did not relieve Amy3D suppression resulting from glucose concentrations >165 mM. These results indicate that limited oxygen availability can counter the ability of lower concentrations of glucose to repress Amy3D gene expression, and they raise the possibility that sugar regulation of Amy3D can occur through two distinct pathways. The physiological concentrations of sugar in the scutellum tissues are considered in the Discussion.

Inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation perturbs sugar regulation of Amy3D expression in the embryo

To identify anoxic factors that alter sugar regulation of the Amy3D gene, it was determined whether respiratory inhibitors could mimic the anoxic effect on Amy3D gene expression. Respiratory inhibitors such as sodium azide (NaN3) and potassium cyanide (KCN) inhibit cytochrome c oxidase by forming a complex with the iron ion in the cytochrome oxidase. As shown in Fig. 2, co-treatment with NaN3 successfully de-repressed Amy3D expression in rice embryos incubated in 80 mM glucose solution for 1 d. KCN also showed the same de-repression effect (data not shown). Since these metabolic inhibitors interfere with the action of all different kinds of metal-containing oxidases (Beevers, 1961), another kind of respiratory inhibitor was employed to determine the effect of inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation. 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP) is an uncoupler that prevents the synthesis of ATP through the cytochrome c oxidase pathway by dissipating the proton gradient across mitochondrial cisternae. Like NaN3 and KCN, DNP also effectively released glucose repression, indicating that de-repression of the Amy3D gene by metabolic inhibitors is due to inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. These results suggest that the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation can cross-talk with the sugar-dependent regulation of Amy3D expression.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Open in a new tab

Effects of oxidative phosphorylation inhibitors on the sugar regulation of the Amy3D gene in isolated rice embryos. Rice embryos were manually harvested from whole seeds and incubated on Whatman paper layers soaked with 10 mM CaCl2 containing sugar (80 mM glucose or mannitol) with or without the respiratory inhibitors sodium azide (NaN3) or 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP) at the indicated concentrations for 1 d in the dark. The presence or absence of glucose is indicated as + or –. The transcript levels of Amy3D were detected as described in Fig. 1. The total amount of RNA loaded is indicated by rRNA stained with ethidium bromide.

Inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation also interferes with the sugar regulation of other Amy3 subfamily genes, which show enhanced expression during anaerobic germination

In addition to Amy3D, the expression of other Amy3 subfamily genes is known to be controlled by sugar levels (Karrer and Rodriguez, 1992; Thomas and Rodriguez, 1994). Therefore, experiments were performed to determine whether the sugar regulation of those genes would also be affected by anoxia or co-treatment with a respiration inhibitor (Fig. 3). Real-time quantitative PCR indicated that the expression of both Amy3B/C and Amy3E was repressed by glucose ∼20-fold, but either oxygen deficiency or co-treatment with a respiratory inhibitor allowed those genes to be highly expressed even in the presence of glucose, as observed with Amy3D. These data indicate that de-repression of the glucose effect by the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation is not unique to Amy3D gene regulation, and that this interference with the repression of Amy3 subfamily gene expression results in a prominently enhanced and sustained expression pattern during the anaerobic germination of rice seeds.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Open in a new tab

Effects of respiratory inhibition on sugar regulation of Amy3 subfamily genes in isolated rice embryos. Rice embryos were incubated in 10 mM CaCl2 solution containing 80 mM glucose or mannitol with or without 0.5 mM NaN3. The presence or absence of glucose, O2, and NaN3 is indicated as + or –. Total RNA was isolated from rice embryos from each treatment and used for first strand synthesis. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed to measure the transcript levels of each Amy3 subfamily gene using the gene-specific primers described in Table 1. The expression ratio between Amy3D, Amy3B/C, or Amy3E and the rice actin gene in 80 mM glucose medium under aerobic conditions was set to 1 as a control. The expression ratios in other conditions are given relative to the control. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n=3).

Prevention of oxidative phosphorylation abolishes the sugar regulation of CIPK15, an upstream positive regulator of SnRK1A

Activation of Amy3D expression under starvation conditions requires an accumulation of SNF1-related protein kinase (SnRK1A), a yeast SNF1 (sucrose non-fermenting-1) orthologue in rice. Recently, another rice protein kinase, CIPK15 (calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase), was demonstrated to be necessary for SnRK1A accumulation under starvation conditions. Intriguingly, the transcript levels of CIPK15 are regulated by sugar similarly to those of Amy3D. Since CIPK15 is a more upstream signalling component than SnRK1A, and its expression itself is under the control of sugar, experiments were conducted to examine whether the sugar regulation of CIPK15 expression is also affected by anoxia or inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation (Fig. 4). Both anoxic conditions and the respiratory inhibitor NaN3 relieved the repressive effect of sugar on CIPK15 transcription, as was observed for Amy3D expression, suggesting that anoxic de-repression of Amy3D expression may be a result of anoxic interference with the sugar regulation of CIPK15.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Open in a new tab

Effects of respiratory inhibition on CIPK15 expression. Rice embryos were incubated in 10 mM CaCl2 solution containing 80 mM glucose or mannitol with or without 0.5 mM NaN3 for 18 h. The presence or absence of glucose, O2, and NaN3 is indicated + or –. Total RNA was isolated from rice embryos from each treatment and used for first-strand synthesis. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed to measure the transcript levels of CIPK15 using the gene-specific primers described in Table 1. The expression ratio between CIPK15 and the rice actin gene in 80^mM glucose under aerobic conditions was set to 1 as a control. The expression ratios in the other conditions are given relative to the control. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n=3).

De-repression of Amy3D by metabolic inhibitors is not due to inhibition of sugar utilization

In addition to glucose, various other sugars are known to repress the expression of sugar-regulated genes (Sheen, 1990; Graham et al., 1994; Umemura et al., 1998). Some of these sugars (mannose, galactose, and fructose) were tested for their ability to repress Amy3D gene expression. All three sugars showed a repressive effect on Amy3D expression, and the repressive effect of 80 mM galactose and fructose could be prevented by co-treatment with NaN3 (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the repression of Amy3D expression induced by 80 mM mannose could not be relieved by NaN3 treatment. Previously, mannose was reported to be more effective at repressing sugar-regulated genes (Jang and Sheen, 1994). Similarly, the expression of the Amy3D gene was found to be much more sensitive to mannose than glucose in the present system. Since de-repression of the sugar effect by oxygen deficiency was sugar concentration dependent (as shown in Fig. 1B), the effect of oxygen deprivation on Amy3D repression imposed by a lower concentration of mannose was examined. Although 0.5 mM mannose was too low to repress the Amy3D gene, 1–5 mM mannose potently suppressed Amy3D expression. This repression by mannose over the lower concentration range (1–5 mM) was fully de-repressible by NaN3, indicating that mannose-dependent repression works in the same manner as that of glucose (Fig. 5B).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Open in a new tab

Sugar concentration-dependent de-repression of mannose effects by respiratory inhibition. Rice embryos were manually harvested from whole seeds and incubated on Whatman paper layers soaked with 10 mM CaCl2 containing (A) 80 mM of each indicated sugar or (B) mannose from 0.5 mM to 5 mM with or without 0.5 mM NaN3 for 1 d in the dark. The presence or absence of NaN3 is indicated as + or –. The transcript levels of Amy3D were detected as described in Fig. 1. The total amount of RNA loaded is indicated by rRNA stained with ethidium bromide.

Next, the respiration efficacy of these three sugars was compared to examine whether they could be efficiently metabolized by rice cells (Fig. 6). Suspension-cultured rice cells were starved for 3 d and then supplied with each sugar for 2 d. Then, the recovery of the respiration rate of the starved cells was examined using an oxygen electrode. In cells starved for 5 d, the respiration rate dropped to ∼30% of the rate before starvation. As expected, cells fed with glucose showed full recovery of respiration within 2 d. Galactose and fructose, which repressed Amy3D expression, were also able to recover respiration rates to the level of non-starved cells, suggesting that they were actively utilized by the suspension-cultured cells. In contrast, mannose supplementation could not recover respiration in the starved cells at all, indicating that rice cells are incapable of respiring mannose as an energy source. Therefore, the de-repression effect induced by the respiratory inhibitors does not appear to be due to preventing rice cells from respiring the co-treating sugar. Instead, the metabolic inhibitors may exert their effect by perturbing the pre-existing cellular energy status.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Open in a new tab

Effects of various sugars on the respiration rate of suspension-cultured rice cells. Seven-day-old rice suspension-cultured cells were washed with sugar-free AA2 medium, incubated in sugar-free AA2 medium for 3 d, transferred to AA2 medium containing one of the indicated sugars, and then kept for 2 d in the dark with active shaking. ‘Non-starved’ and ‘starved’ indicate cells cultured in normal sucrose-containing medium or in sugar-free medium for 5 d, respectively. The respiration rate of the suspension-cultured cells was determined using an oxygen electrode. The error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n=3).

Anoxia and respiratory inhibition rapidly alter cellular ATP levels

Next, experiments were conducted to determine whether the cellular ATP levels were perturbed in rice cells in which glucose repression was relieved by anoxia or respiratory inhibitor treatment. Since it is impossible to measure the ATP levels only in the epithelium tissue of the embryo, rice suspension cells derived from scutellar tissue were employed. Previously, it was demonstrated that these scutellum-derived rice suspension cells display the same sugar regulation of Amy3D gene expression as do intact seeds (Huang et al., 1993). One day of treatment with anoxia or an oxidative phosphorylation inhibitor also de-represses the glucose effect on Amy3D gene expression in suspension-cultured rice cells (Fig. 7A). As shown in Fig. 7B, these treatments also lowered the ATP levels in the suspension cells to 30–60% of the glucose control.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Open in a new tab

Effects of respiratory inhibition on the sugar regulation of Amy3D expression and on the ATP levels in suspension-cultured cells. Suspension cells cultured for 5 d were incubated in AA2 medium containing 20 mM glucose or mannitol with or without 0.5 mM NaN3 or O2 for 1 d in the dark. The presence or absence of glucose, O2, and NaN3 is indicated as + or –. Total RNA was extracted from suspension-cultured rice cells of each treatment and used for northern analysis of Amy3D gene expression. The transcript levels of Amy3D were detected as described in Fig.1. Cell extracts from the same treatment were used to determine the ATP levels.

Discussion

Phytohormonal control of α-amylase genes, which plays a central role in the endospermal digestion of cereal seeds during aerobic germination, has been extensively studied and remains one of the best examples of hormonal control of plant gene expression (Lovegrove and Hooley, 2000). However, despite the importance of anaerobic amylolytic activity during the anaerobic germination of rice seeds, not much is known about the anaerobic regulation of α-amylase gene expression. In this study, the anoxia-enhanced expression of Amy3 subfamily genes, which are under the control of sugar, was investigated. A previous study using in situ hybridization with an Amy3D antisense strand probe specifically localized Amy3D transcripts only to the scutellar epithelium of the embryo, which is a single layer of palisade-shaped cells in close contact with the starchy endosperm (Ranjhan et al., 1992). Since the actual amount of sugars available in the scutellum during germination is unclear, a wide range of sugar concentrations (0–330 mM) in the incubation media were tested to examine the effect of oxygen deprivation on sugar regulation. It was found that oxygen deficiency released the repression of Amy3D expression due to glucose <80 mM (Fig. 1B). Because of the technical difficulty of specifically monitoring the local sugar content in a rice embryo, the steady-state levels of soluble sugars in the scutellum during germination can only be speculative. It is estimated that the amount of sugars there is unlikely to exceed 80 mM significantly during anaerobic germination. For example, total soluble sugar concentrations in rice seed endosperm during anoxic germination have been previously determined to be between 20 mM and 70 mM, depending on the rice variety (Huang et al., 2003). Chen et al. (2006) also reported that the soluble sugar content in the endosperm was ∼200 mM throughout the aerobically germinating period (up to 8 d). Since the anaerobic amylolytic activity of rice seed is <1/4 of the aerobic activity (Hwang et al., 1999), the assumption for the sugar content is not unreasonable. Previously, Loreti et al. (2003) observed that Amy3D could not be expressed well in the presence of 100 mM glucose under anoxia. This observation led them to propose that rice embryos were able to express Amy3D highly in anaerobically germinated seeds because the amount of sugar produced during anaerobic germination was not sufficient to repress the gene. In the present test, it was observed that Amy3D expression was completely repressible by glucose concentrations of ∼20 mM (data not shown). Therefore, considering this high sensitivity of Amy3D expression to low levels of sugar, de-repression of the sugar effect by oxygen deficiency probably leads to an increase in the expression of Amy3 subfamily genes (including Amy3D) during anaerobic germination.

The fact that anoxic de-repression of the glucose effect does not occur in a high-sugar environment (as shown in Fig. 2) suggests that sugar may regulate Amy3D expression via two distinct pathways. Actually, plant cells appear to have several different ways to sense the sugar available to them (Rolland et al., 2006). Both biochemical and genetic evidence suggest that hexokinase plays the role of a sugar sensor and triggers the repression response in many sugar-regulated genes in higher plants (Jang et al., 1997; Moore et al., 2003; Cho et al., 2007). Several lines of evidence imply that the sugar regulation of Amy3D expression also involves the rice hexokinase(s). For example, Umemura et al. (1998) demonstrated that the Amy3D promoter was repressed only by the sugars that serve as a substrate for hexokinase. Also glucosamine, a hexokinase inhibitor, can alleviate the glucose repression of Amy3D. Recently, a transient expression study using rice protoplasts demonstrated that OsHXK5 and OsHXK6 (Oryza sativa Hexokinase 5 and 6), which are evolutionarily related to a well-characterized glucose sensor in Arabidopsis (AtHXK1), modulate the sugar regulation of the Amy3D gene (Cho et al., 2009). Although the exact mode of action of hexokinase in sugar signalling is still not understood, the metabolic utilization of sugars is not likely to be involved in it (Rolland et al., 2006). Recently, dual targeting of hexokinase to the nucleus has been demonstrated in Arabidopsis (Cho et al., 2006) and rice (Cho et al., 2009), suggesting that hexokinase-mediated sugar regulation of gene expression may occur directly through translocation of sugar-bound hexokinase to the nucleus.

On the other hand, cells are also likely to perceive the abundance of sugars by sensing the cellular energy status, since sugars serves as a major metabolic fuel (Halford et al., 1999; Halford and Hey, 2009). For example, SnRK is a plant Ser/Thr protein kinase, similar to SNF1 in yeast and AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) in mammals, and has been suggested to act as a metabolic sensor in the global control of plant carbon metabolism (Halford et al., 2003; Polge and Thomas, 2007; Baena-Gonzalez and Sheen, 2008; Halford and Hey, 2009; Jossier et al., 2009).

Extensive studies have revealed several signalling components involved in the sugar regulation of Amy3D gene expression (Lu et al., 2002, 2007; Chen et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2009). Previously, Lu et al. (2007) demonstrated that SnRK1A serves as a positive regulator for Amy3D expression. For example, SnRK1A protein accumulation is required for the activation of Amy3D expression under starvation conditions. This kinase acts positively upstream of MYBS1, which binds to the TA box (5′TATCCA3′) of the Amy3D gene promoter and activates expression in response to sugar starvation. An RNA interference assay also indicated that rice SnRK1A is necessary for the expression of MYBS1. Therefore, SnRK1A accumulation under starvation conditions induces MYBS1 expression, resulting in Amy3D gene expression. Most importantly, transient expression assays in rice embryos demonstrated that SnRK1A expression was able to relieve the repression of Amy3D imposed by sugar (Lu et al., 2007). Recently, another rice protein kinase, CBL (calcineurin B-like protein)-interacting protein kinase (CIPK15), was found to be required for the post-transcriptional accumulation of SnRK1A in response to starvation (Lee et al., 2009). It is intriguing that the expression of rice CIPK15 is under sugar regulation, which is also abolished by treatment with a respiratory inhibitor or anoxia (Fig. 4). Previously, transient expression assays have revealed that CIPK15 can effectively release the sugar-dependent repression of the Amy3D promoter (Lee et al., 2009). Therefore, anoxic de-repression of CIPK15 expression drives the accumulation of SnRK1A, which induces MYBS1 expression, allowing for the anoxic expression of Amy3D in the presence of sugar. The de-repression of other Amy3 subfamily genes by anoxia (Fig. 3) appears to work in the same way as that of Amy3D, since the proximal regions of all their promoters contain a TA box, which is a MYBS1-binding site under the control of SnRK1A.

It has been demonstrated that the anoxic de-repression of Amy3D is due to oxygen deficiency-induced interference with oxidative phosphorylation (Fig. 2). It is unknown how the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation cross-talks with the sugar regulation of Amy3D expression. It is unlikely that the decrease in ATP production negatively affects hexokinase-mediated sugar signalling. Recent biochemical and genetic evidence strongly suggests that the catalytic activity of hexokinase is not necessary for sugar signalling in Arabidopsis (Moore et al., 2003). In rice, catalytically inactive mutants of OsHXK5 and OsHXK6 were still able to rescue a glucose-sensitive seedling phenotype in the Arabidopsis glucose-insensitive gin2-1 background and also allow sugar regulation of Amy3D gene expression (Cho et al., 2009). This indicated that hexokinase is able to repress Amy3D expression without being able to phosphorylate glucose.

One possibility is that the inhibition of respiration perturbs energy metabolism, which prevents cells from sensing the abundance of sugars available to them. Such an energetic perturbation may be reflected in the transcriptional induction of CIPK15, which in turn drives a signalling cascade that induces Amy3D gene expression. SnRK1A may function in parallel or cooperatively with CIPK15 in response to energy disturbances, since this enzyme may have an evolutionarily conserved role as a sensor of cellular energy. In yeast and mammals, SNF1 and AMPK are activated by energy deficiencies represented by a high AMP/ATP ratio, and they act as metabolic sensors that re-adjust the energy homeostasis (Hardie and Hawley, 2001; Hardie et al., 2006). Therefore, they are known to respond to various environmental stresses (such as sugar starvation and hypoxia, among other things) that can affect the metabolic status.

It is not clear why anoxia cannot abolish the repression of Amy3D expression induced by high levels of sugar. One possibility is a signalling competition between energy deficiency and sugar-bound hexokinase to promote and inhibit Amy3D transcription, respectively. Energy deficiency-driven signalling for Amy3D transcriptional activation may compete with repression signalling triggered by sugar-bound hexokinase. If one signal rules over the other, depending on the sugar environment, differential anoxic de-repression of Amy3D expression may take place. For example, if repression from sugar-bound hexokinase increases along with an increase in the amount of sugars, it may prevail against the activation signalling from a decrease in energy levels due to anoxia-induced oxidative phosphorylation inhibition. It was previously shown that as a phosphorylatable substrate of hexokinase, mannose much more effectively represses the expression of photosynthetic genes under control of hexokinase-mediated sugar regulation than glucose (Jang and Sheen, 1994). In Amy3D regulation, mannose repression appears to be much more difficult to counteract by respiratory inhibition (Fig. 5). For example, anoxia was able fully to abolish the repressive effect of 80 mM glucose on Amy3D, but it was unable to counteract the effect of mannose even at 10 mM (data not shown).

In this study, it was demonstrated for the first time that inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation disrupts the sugar-dependent regulation of rice α-amylase gene expression, probably by de-repressing the sugar effect on CIPK15 transcription, which leads to the accumulation of a positive regulator of Amy3D expression (SnRK1A). This explains the increased expression of Amy3 subfamily genes in embryo tissues during anaerobic germination, which is very important for rice to be able to grow in the underwater environment. Future studies are necessary to determine whether and how a rice cell is able to link changes in metabolic status to transcriptional changes in CIPK15 and SnRK1A activity.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (331-2007-1-C00226; 2008-0058877; 2009-0076503). We would like to thank Dr Jeon Jong-Seong (Plant Metabolism Research Center & Graduate School of Biotechnology, Kyung Hee University) for helping us establish a rice suspension cell culture by kindly providing the initial subculture cells.

References

  1. Baena-Gonzalez E, Sheen J. Convergent energy and stress signaling. Trends in Plant Science. 2008;13:474–482. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Beevers H. New York: Row, Peterson and Company; 1961. Respiratory metabolism in plants. Whilte Plains. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bewley J, Black M. Seeds: physiology of development and germination. New York: Plenum Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry. 1976;72:248–254. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen PW, Chiang CM, Tseng TH, Yu SM. Interaction between rice MYBGA and the gibberellin response element controls tissue-specific sugar sensitivity of alpha-amylase genes. The Plant Cell. 2006;18:2326–2340. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.038844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cho JI, Ryoo N, Eom JS, et al. Role of the rice hexokinases OsHXK5 and OsHXK6 as glucose sensors. Plant Physiology. 2009;149:745–759. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.131227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cho YH, Yoo SD, Sheen J. Regulatory functions of nuclear hexokinase1 complex in glucose signaling. Cell. 2006;127:579–589. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cho YH, Yoo SD, Sheen J. Glucose signaling through nuclear hexokinase1 complex in Arabidopsis. Plant Signaling Behavior. 2007;2:123–124. doi: 10.4161/psb.2.2.3894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Graham IA, Denby KJ, Leaver CJ. Carbon catabolite repression regulates glyoxylate cycle gene expression in cucumber. The Plant Cell. 1994;6:761–772. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.5.761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guglielminetti L, Perata P, Alpi A. Effect of anoxia on carbohydrate metabolism in rice seedlings. Plant Physiology. 1995a;108:735–741. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.2.735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guglielminetti L, Yamaguchi J, Perata P, Alpi A. Amylolytic activities in cereal seeds under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Plant Physiology. 1995b;109:1069–1076. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.3.1069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Halford NG, Hey S, Jhurreea D, Laurie S, McKibbin RS, Paul M, Zhang Y. Metabolic signaling and carbon partitioning: role of Snf1-related (SnRK1) protein kinase. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2003;54:467–475. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Halford NG, Hey SJ. Snf1-related protein kinases (SnRKs) act within an intricate network that links metabolic and stress signaling in plants. Biochemical Journal. 2009;419:247–259. doi: 10.1042/BJ20082408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Halford NG, Purcell PC, Hardie DG. Is hexokinase really a sugar sensor in plants? Trends in Plant Science. 1999;4:117–120. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(99)01377-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hardie DG, Hawley SA. AMP-activated protein kinase: the energy charge hypothesis revisited. Bioessays. 2001;23:1112–1119. doi: 10.1002/bies.10009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hardie DG, Hawley SA, Scott JW. AMP-activated protein kinase—development of the energy sensor concept. Journal of Physiology. 2006;574:7–15. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.108944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang N, Chandler J, Thomas BR, Koizumi N, Rodriguez RL. Metabolic regulation of alpha-amylase gene expression in transgenic cell cultures of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plant Molecular Biology. 1993;23:737–747. doi: 10.1007/BF00021529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang N, Koizumi N, Reinl S, Rodriguez RL. Structural organization and differential expression of rice alpha-amylase genes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1990;18:7007–7014. doi: 10.1093/nar/18.23.7007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang S, Greenway H, Colmer TD. Anoxia tolerance in rice seedlings: exogenous glucose improves growth of an anoxia-'intolerant’, but not of a ‘tolerant’ genotype. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2003;54:2363–2373. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hwang YS, Thomas BR, Rodriguez RL. Differential expression of rice alpha-amylase genes during seedling development under anoxia. Plant Molecular Biology. 1999;40:911–920. doi: 10.1023/a:1006241811136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Itoh K, Yamaguchi J, Huang N, Rodriguez RL, Akazawa T, Shimamoto K. Developmental and hormonal regulation of rice α-amylase (RAmy1A) –gusA fusion genes in transgenic rice seeds. Plant Physiology. 1995;107:25–31. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jang JC, Leon P, Zhou L, Sheen J. Hexokinase as a sugar sensor in higher plants. The Plant Cell. 1997;9:5–19. doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.1.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jang JC, Sheen J. Sugar sensing in higher plants. The Plant Cell. 1994;6:1665–1679. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.11.1665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jossier M, Bouly JP, Meimoun P, Arjmand A, Lessard P, Hawley S, Grahame Hardie D, Thomas M. SnRK1 (SNF1-related kinase 1) has a central role in sugar and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal. 2009;59:316–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03871.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Karrer EE, Litts JC, Rodriguez RL. Differential expression of alpha-amylase genes in germinating rice and barley seeds. Plant Molecular Biology. 1991;16:797–805. doi: 10.1007/BF00015072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Karrer EE, Rodriguez RL. Metabolic regulation of rice alpha-amylase and sucrose synthase genes in planta. The Plant Journal. 1992;2:517–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lasanthi-Kudahettige R, Magneschi L, Loreti E, Gonzali S, Licausi F, Novi G, Beretta O, Vitulli F, Alpi A, Perata P. Transcript profiling of the anoxic rice coleoptile. Plant Physiology. 2007;144:218–231. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.093997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee KW, Chen PW, Lu CA, Chen S, Ho TH, Yu SM. Coordinated responses to oxygen and sugar deficiency allow rice seedlings to tolerate flooding. Science Signaling. 2009 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000333. 2, ra61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Loreti E, Yamaguchi J, Alpi A, Perata P. Sugar modulation of alpha-amylase genes under anoxia. Annals of Botany. 2003;91:143–148. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lovegrove A, Hooley R. Gibberellin and abscisic acid signaling in aleurone. Trends in Plant Science. 2000;5:102–110. doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(00)01571-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lu CA, Ho TH, Ho SL, Yu SM. Three novel MYB proteins with one DNA binding repeat mediate sugar and hormone regulation of alpha-amylase gene expression. The Plant Cell. 2002;14:1963–1980. doi: 10.1105/tpc.001735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lu CA, Lin CC, Lee KW, Chen JL, Huang LF, Ho SL, Liu HJ, Hsing YI, Yu SM. The SnRK1A protein kinase plays a key role in sugar signaling during germination and seedling growth of rice. The Plant Cell. 2007;19:2484–99. doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.037887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Magneschi L, Kudahettige RL, Alpi A, Perata P. Comparative analysis of anoxic coleoptile elongation in rice varieties: relationship between coleoptile length and carbohydrate levels, fermentative metabolism and anaerobic gene expression. Plant Biology (Stuttgart, Germany) 2009;11:561–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00150.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Moore B, Zhou L, Rolland F, Hall Q, Cheng WH, Liu YX, Hwang I, Jones T, Sheen J. Role of the Arabidopsis glucose sensor HXK1 in nutrient, light, and hormonal signaling. Science. 2003;300:332–336. doi: 10.1126/science.1080585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. O'Neill SD, Kumagai MH, Majumdar A, Huang N, Sutliff TD, Rodriguez RL. The alpha-amylase genes in Oryza sativa: characterization of cDNA clones and mRNA expression during seed germination. Molecular and General Genetics. 1990;221:235–244. doi: 10.1007/BF00261726. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Perata P, Geshi N, Yamaguchi J, Akazawa T. Effect of anoxia on the induction of α-amylase in cereal seeds. Planta. 1993;191:402–408. [Google Scholar]
  37. Perata P, Guglielminetti L, Alpi A. Mobilization of endosperm reserves in cereal seeds and anoixa. Annals of Botany. 1997;79 (Supplement A), 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  38. Polge C, Thomas M. SNF1/AMPK/SnRK1 kinases, global regulators at the heart of energy control? Trends in Plant Science. 2007;12:20–28. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ranjhan S, Karrer EE, Rodriguez RL. Localizing α-amylase gene expression in germinated rice grains. Plant and Cell Physiology. 1992;33:73–79. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ricard B, Rivoal J, Spiteri A, Pradet A. Anaerobic stress induces the transcription and translation of sucrose synthase in rice. Plant Physiology. 1991;95:669–674. doi: 10.1104/pp.95.3.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rolland F, Baena-Gonzalez E, Sheen J. Sugar sensing and signaling in plants: conserved and novel mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2006;57:675–709. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sheen J. Metabolic repression of transcription in higher plants. The Plant Cell. 1990;2:1027–1038. doi: 10.1105/tpc.2.10.1027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Thomas BR, Rodriguez RL. Metabolite signals regulate gene expression and source/sink relations in cereal seedlings. Plant Physiology. 1994;106:1235–1239. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.4.1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Thompson J, Abdullah R, Cocking E. Protoplast culture of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using media solidified with agarose. Plant Science. 1986;47:123–133. [Google Scholar]
  45. Umemura T, Perata P, Futsuhara Y, Yamaguchi J. Sugar sensing and alpha-amylase gene repression in rice embryos. Planta. 1998;204:420–428. doi: 10.1007/s004250050275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Webb T, Armstrong W. The effects of anoxia and carbohydrates on the growth and viability of rice, pea and pumpkin roots. Journal of Experimental Botany. 1983;34:579–603. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yu S-M, Tzou W-S, Lo W-S, Kuo Y-H, Lee H-T, Wu R. Regulation of α-amylase-encoding gene expression in germinating seeds and cultured cells of rice. Gene. 1992;122:247–253. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90212-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES