Abstract
Backgroud
Interleukin-10(IL-10) is a multifunctional cytokine with both immunosuppressive and antiangiogenic functions. Polymorphisms in the IL-10 gene promoter genetically determine interindividual differences in IL-10 production. This study was performed to determined whether polymorphisms in the IL-10 gene promoter were associated with breast cancer in a Chinese Han population.
Methods
We genotyped 315 patients with breast cancer and 322 healthy control subjects for -1082A/G, -819T/C and -592A/C single nucleotide polymorphisms in the promoter region of the IL-10 gene by polymerase chain reactionerestriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP).
Results
There were no significant differences in genotype, allele, or haplotype frequencies in all three loci between patients and healthy controls. Analysis of breast cancer prognostic and predictive factors revealed that the -1082AA genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of lymph node (LN) involvement (P = 0.041) and larger tumor size (P = 0.039) at the time of diagnosis. Furthermore, in the haplotype analysis of IL-10 gene, we found that patients carrying ATA haplotype were in higher LN involvement (p = 0.022) and higher tumor stage(p = 0.028) of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis compared with others.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that IL-10 promoter polymorphisms participate in the progression of breast cancer rather than in its initial development in Chinese Han women.
Introduction
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy threatening the health and life of women and it's incidence has increased in recent years in both developed and developing countries[1]. Biologic mechanisms leading to the development of breast cancer are not clearly understood, but the role of cytokines in cancer immunity and carcinogenesis has been well established[2]. As a multifunctional Th2-cytokine with both immunosuppressive and anti-angiogenic functions, interleukin-10 (IL-10) may have both tumor-promoting and tumor-inhibiting properties[3]. Recent data suggest that polymorphic variations in the promoter sequences of IL-10 gene may influence the gene expression[4,5] and consequently play a certain role in susceptibility and clinical course of breast cancer.
IL-10 is an important immunoregulatory cytokine mainly produced by activated T cells, monocytes, B cells and thymocytes. As an immune response modulator, IL-10 can both stimulate and suppress the immune response[6]. Numerous studies have shown that IL-10 may be involved in the pathogenesis of cancer, but the results were inconsistent. On the one hand, increased serum IL-10 levels could facilitate development of cancer by suppressing expression of MHC class I and II antigens[7] and preventting tumor antigen presentation to CD8-cytotoxic T lymphocytes. On the other hand, anti-angiogenic effects of IL-10 are supposed to play a protective and preventive role against tumor.
The gene encoding IL-10 is located on human chromosome 1q31-1q32[8,9], and is composed of five exons and four introns. It has been reported that several important polymorphic sites in the IL-10 gene, including three in the promoter region (-1082 (A/G, -819 T/C, -592 A/C) may influence the transcription of IL-10 messenger RNA and the expression of IL-10 in vitro [10-12]. Although several studies have shown the possible involvement of IL-10 in the pathogenesis of breast cancer, as well as its association with prognosis in different ethnic populations, the results were not all consistent[13]. Furthermore, little is known about the effect of these polymorphisms on the risk of beast cancer in the Han Chinese population. The goal of this study was to evaluate whether IL-10 gene promoter -1082A/G, -819T/C and -592A/C polymorphisms and haplotypes were associated with breast cancer in a Han Chinese population.
Materials and methods
Subjects
Blood samples were taken from 315 breast cancer cases and 322 non-cancer controls. The case group was recruited between October 2008 and October 2009 from the Shan Dong Cancer Hospital and the PLA 456 Hospital. The patients' pathological and clinical information were obtained from their medical files. All cases were newly diagnosed and previously untreated. The control group consisted of 322 healthy age-matched women who visited the general health check-up division at the two hospitals in the period between October 2008 and October 2009. Selection criteria for controls were no evidence of any personal or family history of cancer or other serious illness. At recruitment, each participant was personally interviewed to obtain detailed information on demographic characteristics and lifetime history of tobacco and alcohol use. All subjects were unrelated ethnic Han Chinese and residents of northern China. The study has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Shan Dong Cancer Hospital and the PLA 456 Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participating subjects.
Polymorphism analysis
Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes of control subjects and breast cancer patients by the salting-out method as described previously [14]. Genotypes were assayed with polymerase chain reactionerestriction fragment length polymorphism(RFLP) methods. The PCR primers were designed based on described previously[15]. The PCR was performed with a 25-μL reaction mixture containing 100 ng of genomic DNA, 0.5 μmol/L of each primer, 200 μmol/L of each dNTP, 2.5U of Taq DNA polymerase (Omega, Doraville, GA), 10× PCR buffer supplied by Invitrogen Corp (10 mmol/l Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, 50 mmol/l KCl), and 2.0 mmol/L MgCl2. The PCR profile consisted of an initial melting step of 5 minutes at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 seconds at 94°C, 45 seconds at 58°C for -1082A/G, 59°C for -819 T/C and 62°C for -592 A/C; 55 s at 72°C; and a final elongation at 72°C for 8 min. The restriction endonucleases MnlI, MaeIII, and RsaI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) were used to distinguish the IL-10 gene -1082A/G, -819T/C, -592A/C polymorphisms, respectively (Table1). To confirm the genotyping results, PCR-amplified DNA samples were examined by DNA sequencing, and the results were 100% concordant (data not shown).
Table 1.
Primer sequences and reaction conditions for genotyping IL-10 polymorphisms
| Polymorphism | db SNP ID | PCR Primer sequence | RE | Product size(bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -1082 A/G | Rs1800870 | F: 5'-CTCGCTGCAACCCAACTGGC-3' R: 5'-TCTTACCTATCCCTACTTCC-3' |
MnlI | G: 106+33 A: 139 |
| -819 T/C | Rs1800871 | F: 5-TCATTCTATGTGCTGGAGATGG-3' R: 5'-TGGGGGAAGTGGGTAAGAGT-3' |
MaeIII | C:125+84 T: 209 |
| -592 A/C | Rs1800872 | F: 5-GGTGAGCACTACCTGACTAGC-3' R: 5'-CCTAGGTCACAGTGACGTGG-3' |
RsaI | A:236+176 C: 412 |
Abbreviations: dbSNP ID, database identifier; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RE, restriction endonuclease.
Statistical analysis
Genotype and allele frequencies of IL-10 were compared between breast cancer cases and controls by the chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test when necessary. The odds rations (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to estimate the relative risk conferred by a particular allele and genotype. Demographic and clinical data between groups were compared by chi-squared test and by Student's t-test. Statistical significance was assumed at the p < 0.05 level. The SPSS for Windows (version 13.0; SPSS, Inc) was used for all of the statistical analysis.
Results
Subject characteristics
The demographics of the cases and controls enrolled in this study are summarized in Table2. There were no statistically significant differences between the cases and controls for the age, menopausal status (P = 0.979 and P = 0.593, respectively), and this suggested that the matching based on these two variables was adequate.
Table 2.
Characteristics of patients with breast cancer and healthy controls
| Variable | Patients, no. (%) | Controls, no. (%) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| n = 315 | n = 322 | ||
| Age(year) | 0.979 | ||
| < 48 | 165 (52.4) | 169 (52.5) | |
| ≥48 | 150 (47.6) | 153 (47.5) | |
| Menopausal status | 0.593 | ||
| Premenopausal | 144 (45.7) | 154 (47.8) | |
| Postmenopausal | 171 (54.3) | 168 (52.2) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | |||
| < 2 | 104 (33.0) | ||
| 2~5 | 167 (53.0) | ||
| ≥5 | 44 (14.0) | ||
| LN involvement | |||
| Positive | 117 (37.1) | ||
| Negative | 198 (62.9) | ||
| ER expression | |||
| Positive | 169 (53.7) | ||
| Negative | 146 (46.3) | ||
| PR expression | |||
| Positive | 166 (52.7) | ||
| Negative | 149 (47.3) | ||
Genotype and allele frequencies
The genotype and allele frequencies of the IL-10 gene polymorphisms in breast cancer patients and healthy controls are show in Table3. The genotypes were found to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in both case and control groups. Statistical analysis, however, revealed no significant differences in the genotype and allele frequencies at all three SNP sites between patients and healthy controls. In addition to overall comparisons, the genotype frequencies were compared in subgroups classified according to menopausal status and no association was found between genotypes and risk of breast cancer.
Table 3.
Genotype and allele frequencies of IL-10 promoter polymorphisms in breast cancer patients and healthy controls
| Frequency, no.(%) | Frequency, no.(%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genetype | Patients n = 315 | Controls n = 322 | P-value | Alleles | Patients 2n = 630 | Controls 2n = 644 | P-value |
| -1082 A/G | 0.664 | -1082 A/G | 0.374 | ||||
| AA | 285 (90.5) | 285 (88.5) | A | 599 (95.1) | 605 (93.9) | ||
| AG | 29 (9.2) | 35 (10.9) | G | 31 (4.9) | 39 (6.1) | ||
| GG | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.6) | |||||
| -819 T/C | 0.604 | -819 T/C | 0.315 | ||||
| TT | 119 (37.8) | 134 (41.6) | T | 373 (59.2) | 399 (62.0) | ||
| TC | 135 (42.9) | 131 (40.7) | C | 257 (40.8) | 245 (38.0) | ||
| CC | 61 (19.3) | 57 (17.7) | |||||
| -592 A/C | 0.604 | -592 A/C | 0.315 | ||||
| AA | 119 (37.8) | 134 (41.6) | A | 373 (59.2) | 399 (62.0) | ||
| AC | 135 (42.9) | 131 (40.7) | C | 257 (40.8) | 245 (38.0) | ||
| CC | 61 (19.3) | 57 (17.7) | |||||
Analysis of association between genotypes and clinicopathologic features of breast cancer revealed no association between genotypes at these positions and ER expression and PR expression. Tumor size was significantly different between carriers of the AA genotype at position -1082 A/G in comparison to other genotypes (P = 0.039). In addition, LN involvement was significantly lower in patients harboring at least one G allele at position -1082 A/G (AG and GG genotypes) in comparison to patients with the AA genotype(P = 0.041). (Table4)
Table 4.
Genotype frequencies of IL-10 and clinicopathologic features of breast cancer patients
| Clinicopathologic features | n | Genetype (%) | χ2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | AG+GG | ||||
| ER expression | 0.001 | 0.971 | |||
| Positive | 169 | 153 (90.5) | 16 (9.5) | ||
| Negative | 146 | 132 (90.4) | 14 (9.6) | ||
| PR expression | 0.209 | 0.647 | |||
| Positive | 166 | 149 (89.8) | 17 (10.2) | ||
| Negative | 149 | 136 (91.3) | 13 (8.7) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 6.471 | 0.039 | |||
| < 2 | 104 | 88 (84.6) | 16 (15.4) | ||
| 2~5 | 167 | 155 (92.8) | 12 (7.2) | ||
| ≥5 | 44 | 42 (95.5) | 2 (4.5) | ||
| LN involvement | 4.174 | 0.041 | |||
| Negative | 198 | 174 (87.9) | 24 (12.1) | ||
| Positive | 117 | 111 (94.9) | 6 (5.1) | ||
Haplotypes analysis
The estimated haplotype frequencies of IL-10 polymorphisms in breaste cancer patients and controls are shown in Table5. Complete linkage disequilibrium was observed between locus -819T/C and locus -592 A/C. Four possible haplotypes were demonstrated in our population. The most frequent haplotype in both patients and controls was ATA haplotype(harboring wild type alleles of all three positions and with 56.5% frequency in patients vs. 58.5% in controls). The frequencies of haplotype were investigated and no significant differences were observed between patients and healthy controls.
Table 5.
Frequencies of IL-10 Haplotypes(-1082, -810, -592) in breast cancer patients and healthy controls
| Patients, no. (%) | Controls, no. (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Possible haplotype | 2n = 630 | 2n = 644 | χ2 | P-value |
| ATA | 356 (56.5) | 377 (58.5) | 1.857 | 0.603 |
| ACC | 243 (38.6) | 228 (35.4) | ||
| GTA | 17 (2.7) | 22 (3.4) | ||
| GCC | 14 (2.2) | 17 (2.6) | ||
Analysis of breast cancer prognostic and predictive factors revealed that ATA haplotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis as compared with other haplotypes(P = 0.022). In addition, we also found strong association between tumor size and the ATA haplotypes(P = 0.028). (Table6)
Table 6.
Frequencies of IL-10 Haplotypes(-1082, -810, -592) and clinicopathologic features of breast cancer patients
| haplotype (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinicopathologic features | 2n | ATA | non-ATA | χ2 | p |
| ER expression | 0.026 | 0.872 | |||
| Positive | 338 | 192 (56.8) | 146 (43.2) | ||
| Negative | 292 | 164 (56.2) | 128 (43.8) | ||
| PR expression | 0.010 | 0.922 | |||
| Positive | 332 | 187 (56.3) | 145 (43.7) | ||
| Negative | 298 | 169 (56.7) | 129 (43.3) | ||
| Tumor size (cm) | 7.180 | 0.028 | |||
| < 2 | 208 | 105 (50.5) | 103 (49.5) | ||
| 2~5 | 334 | 192 (57.5) | 142 (42.5) | ||
| ≥5 | 88 | 59 (67.0) | 29 (33.0) | ||
| LN involvement | 5.246 | 0.022 | |||
| Negative | 396 | 210 (53.0) | 186 (47.0) | ||
| Positive | 234 | 146 (62.4) | 88 (37.6) | ||
Discussion
In this case-control study we evaluated the association between the polymorphisms of the IL-10 promoter and breast cancer in a Han Chinese population. Our data did not show significant differences in allele, genotype and haplotype frequencies between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. In concordance with our study, Howell et al.[16], Smith et al. [17] and Balasubramanian et al.[18] reported that there were no apparent relationship of the IL-10 gene promoter polymorphisms with the risk of breast cancer. However, these results are not consistent with the study conducted in Austrian previously, in which the -592AA genotype was shown to be associated with a reduced breast cancer risk[19]. Moreover, another study from the Italian population showed that the IL-10 -1082AA genotype was correlated with a marked increase in breast cancer risk[20]. Although it is difficult to determine the reasons behind the contradictory results in these studies, the different genetic background of study population may be one of the main factors.
In this study, we found that the frequencies of the -1082 G, -819 C and -592 C alleles among the healthy controls (0.061, 0.380 and 0.380, respectively) were similar to those observed in an Asian population[21,22] but significantly lower than those of European Caucasians [23-25]. We also found that there was strong linkage disequilibrium among the -1082A/G, -819 T/C and -592 A/C polymorphisms. Complete linkage disequilibrium was observed between locus -819T/C and locus -592 A/C. Four possible haplotypes were demonstrated in our population. Major haplotype frequency of the ATA among the controls in the present study was 0.585, which was significantly higher than those of study performed in the European Caucasians (0.290 and 0.248, respectively)[24,26]. These results suggest that the frequencies of IL-10 gene alleles and haplotypes might vary among the different ethnic population.
Although we did not find an association of the IL-10 gene polymorphisms with risk of breast cancer, in present study we reported for the first time that the IL-10 promoter haplotypes and -1082 A/G polymorphism were significantly associated with the prognostic and predictive factors of breast cancer in Chinese han women. Our data showed that the -1082AA genotype was associated with a significantly increased risk of lymph node (LN) involvement (P = 0.041) and larger tumor size (P = 0.039) at the time of diagnosis. Moreover, in the haplotype analysis of IL-10 gene, we also found that patients carrying ATA haplotype were in higher LN involvement (p = 0.022) and higher tumor stage(p = 0.028) of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis compared with others. The findings suggest that the IL-10 ATA haplotype and -1082AA genotype might be adverse prognostic factors in breast cancer in Chinese Han women.
IL-10 is a multifunctional cytokine with both immunosuppressive and antiangiogenic functions, which may play varied roles in the pathogenesis and development of breast cancer. Although the genetic control of IL-10 expression is not clearly understood yet, polymorphisms in promoter have been reported to determine interindividual differences in IL-10 production[4,9]. Previous studies indicated that IL-10 promoter -1082 AA genotype was associated with decreased IL-10 expression[27]. ATA haplotype formed by polymorphisms at positions -1,082, -819 and -592 in the promoter of the IL-10 gene has been is generally assumed to be a lower IL-10 responder[10-12]. This and the present study indicate that low levels of IL-10 may play a facilitative role in the development of breast cancer. Findings of our study are further supported by a recent study showing that the low-expression allele and haplotype were associated with reduced disease-free survival and the IL-10 gene polymorphisms may be a potential prognosis marker in breast cancer for disease-free survival[28]. The mechanism for this remains unclear, but may likely include anti-angiogenic functions of IL-10.
In conclusion, in this case-control study, we report for the first time that the IL-10 promoter polymorphisms were significantly associated with the prognostic and predictive factors of breast cancer in a Chinese han population. The main finding of our study suggests that IL-10 promoter polymorphisms participate in the progression of breast cancer rather than in its initial development. Considering limited sample size, nonrandom sampling and pitfalls of unknown confounders, further studies with larger sample size from different ethnic origins are required to confirm and extend our observations. In addition, more studies should be carried out to clarify the exact molecular mechanism of IL-10 polymorphisms effects.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
WL, FK and JL designed the study, collected the materials, performed all experiments, YL drafted the manuscript. BS and HW participated in the study and performed the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final version manuscript.
Contributor Information
Fanjun Kong, Email: kongfanjun456@163.com.
Jie Liu, Email: liujie691012@126.com.
Yongheng Liu, Email: liuyongheng456@163.com.
Bao Song, Email: songbaojn@126.com.
Hualing Wang, Email: wanghualing456@163.com.
Wenchao Liu, Email: xjcancer@163.com.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30973437).
References
- Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents:defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(14):2137–2150. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.2308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smyth MJ, Cretney E, Kershaw MH, Hayakawa Y. Cytokines in cancer immunity and immunotherapy. Immunol Rev. 2004;202:275–293. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00199.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mocellin S, Marincola F, Rossi CR, Nitti D, Lise M. The multifaceted relationship between IL-10 and adaptive immunity:putting together the pieces of a puzzle. Cytokine Growth Factor.Rev. 2004;15:61–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2003.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turner DM, Williams DM, Sankaran D, Lazzarus M, Sinnott PJ, Hutchinson IV. An investigation of polymorphism in the interleukin-10 gene promoter. Eur J Immunogenet. 1997;24:1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2370.1997.tb00001.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gibson AW, Edberg JC, Wu J, Westendorp RG, Huizinga TW, Kimberly RP. Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in the distal IL-10 promoter affect IL-10 production and enhance the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2001;166:3915–3922. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.3915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mocellin S, Marincola FM, Young HA. Interleukin-10 and the immune response against cancer: a counterpoint. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;78:1043–1051. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0705358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsuda M, Salazar F, Petersson M, Masucci G, Hansson J, Pisa P. Interleukin 10 pretreatment protects target cells from tumor- and allospecific cytotoxic T cells and downregulates HLA class I expression. J Exp Med. 1994;180:2371–2376. doi: 10.1084/jem.180.6.2371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim JM, Brannan CI, Copeland NG. Structure of the mouse IL-10 gene and chromosomal localization of the mouse and human genes. J Immunol. 1992;148:3618–3623. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eskdale J, Kube D, Tesch H. Mapping of the human IL10 gene and further characterization of the 5'flanking sequence. Immunogenetics. 1997;46:120–128. doi: 10.1007/s002510050250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kingo K, Ratsep R, Koks S, Karelson M, Silm H, Vasar E. Influence of genetic polymorphisms on interleukin-10 mRNA expression and psoriasis susceptibility. J Dermatol Sci. 2005;37:111–113. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2004.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crawley E, Kay R, Sillibourne J, Patel P, Hutchinson I, Woo P. Polymorphic haplotypes of the interleukin-10 5'flanking region determine variable interleukin-10 transcription and are associated with particular phenotypes of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1101–1108. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199906)42:6<1101::AID-ANR6>3.0.CO;2-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoffmann SC, Stanley EM, Darrin E Cox, Craighead N, DiMercurio BS, Koziol DE, Harlan DM, Kirk AD, Blair PJ. Association of cytokine polymorphic inheritance and in vitro cytokine production in anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated peripheral blood lymphocytes. Transplantation. 2001;72:1444–1450. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200110270-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howell WM, Rose-Zerilli MJ. Cytokine gene polymorphisms, cancer susceptibility, and prognosis. J Nutr. 2007;137(1 Suppl):194S–199S. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.1.194S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- John SW, Weitzner G, Rozen R, Scriver CR. A rapid procedure for extracting genomic DNA from leukocytes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991;19:408. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.2.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shih CM, Lee YL, Chiou HL. The involvement of genetic polymorphism of IL-10 promoter in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2005;50(3):291–297. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2005.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Howell WM, Rose-Zerilli MJ. Interleukin- 10 polymorphisms, cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Fam Cancer. 2006;5(2):143–149. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-0072-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith KC, Bateman AC, Fussell HM, Howell WM. Cytokine gene polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility and prognosis. Eur J Immunogenet. 2004;31:167–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2370.2004.00462.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Balasubramanian SP, Azmy IA, Higham SE. Interleukin gene polymorphisms and breast cancer: a case control study and systematic literature review. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:188. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langsenlehner U, Krippl P, Renner W, Yazdani-Biuki B, Eder T, Koppel H, Wascher TC, Paulweber B, Samonigg H. Interleukin- 10 promoter polymorphism is associated with decreased breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;90:113–5. doi: 10.1007/s10549-004-3607-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giordani L, Bruzzi P, Lasalandra C, Quaranta M, Schittulli F, Della F Ragione, Iolascon A. Polymorphisms of Interleukin-10 and tumour necrosis factor-α gene promoter and breast cancer risk. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1664–1667. doi: 10.1373/49.10.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meenagh A, Willians F, Ross OA. Frequency of cytokinepolymor phisms in populations from western Europe, Africa, Asia, the Middle East and South America. Human Immunol. 2002;63:1055–1061. doi: 10.1016/S0198-8859(02)00440-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chin HJ, Na KY, Kim SJ. Interleukin- 10 promoter polymorphism is associated with the predisposition to the development of IgA nephropathy and focal segmental glomeruloselerosis in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20(6):989–993. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.6.989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alonso R, Suarez A, Castro P, Lacave AJ, Gutierrez C. Influence of interleukin-10 genetic polymorphism on survival rates in melanoma patients with advanced disease. Melanoma Res. 2005;15:53–60. doi: 10.1097/00008390-200502000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scassellati C, Zanardini R, Squitti R. Promoter haplotypes of interleukin-10 gene and sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. 2004;35:119–122. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poli F, Nocco A, Berra S. Allelle frequencies of polymorphisms of TNFα, IL-6, IL-10 and IFN G in an Italian Caucasian population. Eur J Immunogrnet. 2002;29(3):237–240. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2370.2002.00303.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mangia A, Santoro R, Piattelli M. IL- 10 haplotypes as possible predictors of spontaneous clearance of HCV infection. Cytokine. 2004;25:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2003.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eskdale J, Gallagher. A polymorphic dinucleotide repeat in the human IL-10 promoter. Immunogenetics. 1995;42:444–445. doi: 10.1007/BF00179416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gerger A, Renner W, Langsenlehner T, Hofmann G, Knechtel G, Szkandera J, Samonigg H, Krippl P, Langsenlehner U. Association of interleukin-10 gene variation with breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;119:701–705. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0417-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]