Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;67(4):392–394. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2010.02.028

Aspergillus DNA contamination in blood collection tubes

Elizabeth Harrison 1, Thomas Stahlberger 1, Ruth Whelan 1, Michele Sugrue 2, John R Wingard 2, Barbara D Alexander 3, Sarah A Follett 4, Paul Bowyer 1, David W Denning 1, for the Aspergillus Technology Consortium (AsTeC)
PMCID: PMC2907359  NIHMSID: NIHMS186395  PMID: 20638611

Abstract

Fungal PCR-based diagnostic methods are at risk of contamination. Sample collection containers were investigated for fungal DNA contamination using real-time PCR assays. Up to 18% of blood collection tubes were contaminated with fungal DNA, probably A. fumigatus. Lower proportions of contamination in other vessels were observed.


The incidence of invasive aspergillosis (IA) is increasing amongst immunocompromised individuals with an estimated one million deaths worldwide (Maschmeyer and Haas 2008). The need for a universally applicable rapid and sensitive diagnostic method is pressing (Denning 1998). PCR based detection of Aspergillus nucleic acids provides a well explored diagnostic technique that could fulfil these criteria (Chen et al 2002, Perlin and Zhao 2009). However, Aspergillus is ubiquitous in the environment and DNA contamination in a diagnostic assay can arise from dead or fragmented fungi. Given the costs and side effects of the preferred antifungal therapeutics (Menzin et al 2009), even very low levels of false positive results or contamination have serious consequences. The most convenient source of material for diagnosis is blood. An 8% contamination rate in over 3,000 fungal PCR assays performed on whole blood over 2 years has been reported (Loeffler et al 1999). Contaminating DNA from 12 different Aspergillus species caused a false positive rate of 19% with sources of contamination including DNA extraction and PCR reagents (Palmer et al 2001).

We investigated the prevalence of fungal DNA contamination originating from blood collection tubes and a variety of other clinically relevant vessels from a range of manufacturers using a DNA extraction kit that has been proven free from fungal DNA (data not shown) (MycXtra, Myconostica, Manchester, UK). Extracted DNA was tested using a quality controlled commercial molecular beacon (MB) real-time PCR assay that detects Aspergillus and Penicillium spp. (FXG:Resp (Asp+), Myconostica). Positive samples were screened using a second PCR assay with a TaqMan (TM) probe specific for Aspergillus fumigatus only.

Collection vessels tested and rates of contamination detected are listed in table 1. To test for microbiological contamination, sterile PBS-Tween 80 (1mL) was added to each vessel and agitated on a vortex mixer for 1 minute. An aliquot (100μL) was then spread onto Sabouraud dextrose agar plates and incubated at 30°C for 2 weeks. To test for fungal DNA contamination, molecular grade sterile water (1mL) was added to each vessel and agitated on a vortex mixer for 1 minute followed by DNA extraction with the MycXtra kit. Tubes containing liquid additives had 1mL of water added and 1mL total liquid removed for DNA extraction. DNA extraction was performed in a laboratory that is environmentally monitored for fungal contamination. Sabouraud dextrose agar plates were left open on the laboratory bench top during extraction to measure the local airborne fungal flora and incubated at 30°C for 2 weeks. After DNA extraction, 5μl of the extract was tested in an Aspergillus MB real-time PCR assay (Myconostica) using an ABI 7500 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) which has a detection limit of 50 target 18S rRNA copies, equating to approximately 1 genome (Herrera et al 2009, Tyagi and Kramer 1996). Each multiplex PCR included primers and molecular beacons to detect Aspergillus DNA with an internal amplification control to assess the occurrence of inhibition. PCR positive samples and controls were tested with an Aspergillus fumigatus TM assay described elsewhere (Challier et al 2004). PCR set-up was performed under sterile laminar flow using a dedicated hood, equipment and lab coats. The area was regularly disinfected and monitored for fungal spores using settle plates and an air sampler. Aspergillus DNA-free sterile supplies of water, pipettes, pipette tips and plasticware were maintained throughout.

Table 1.

Collection vessels tested, manufacturer, number tested and frequency of Aspergillus PCR positivity

Type of vessel Additive Manufacturer Lots tested Tested per lot (total tested) MB PCR positive (%)
Whole blood collection tube 2mL K2EDTA (Spray Dried) BD Vacutainer 1 10 (10) 0 (0)
Whole blood collection tube 6mL K2EDTA (Spray Dried) BD Vacutainer 3 25 (75) 12 (16)
Whole blood collection tube 6mL K3EDTA (Liquid) BD Vacutainer 1 25 (25) 0 (0)
Whole blood collection tube 7mL K3EDTA (Liquid) BD Vacutainer 3 25 (75) 19 (15)
Serum blood collection tube 3mL Clot Activator (Spray Dried) BD Vacutainer 1 10 (10) 0 (0)
Serum blood collection tube 6mL Clot Activator (Spray Dried) BD Vacutainer 3 25 (75) 5 (7)
Serum blood collection tube 6mL None BD Vacutainer 2 25 (50) 11 (18)
Serum blood collection tube 10 mL None BD Vacutainer 1 25 (25) 0 (0)
Cell preparation tube (CPT) Sodium citrate and Ficoll BD Vacutainer 3 6 (18) 0 (0)
PaxGeneRNA Multiple PreAnalytiX GmbH 2 6 (12) 0 (0)
RNA later RNA stabilization reagent Ambion 2 10 (20) 1 (5)
BAL collection container 40cc - Busse 2 12 (24) 0 (0)
Urine collection container (sterile cup only) - Medline 1 25 (25) 2 (8)
Urine collection container (sterile mid stream kit) - Medline 1 25 (25) 0 (0)
Cryovial container 2mL - Simport 1 10 (10) 0 (0)
Cryovial container 3mL - Simport 2 10 (20) 0 (0)
Pipette tips 1000μL - Eppendorf 2 5 (10) 0 (0)

Paxgene additives: Tetradecyltrimethylammonium oxalate solution, tartaric acid and undisclosed non-hazardous substances

No fungal colonies grew from the collection vessels tested. All DNA extraction controls were culture and PCR negative. The frequency of MB PCR positive results are listed in table 1. Ct values ranged from 32.5 to the limit of detection (LOD) of 38.1. The TM assay showed 96% (48/50) agreement with samples that were MB positive.

Of the whole blood collection tubes, 12 of 85 (14%) spray dried and 19 of 100 (19%) liquid tubes were contaminated. Of the serum blood collection tubes, 5 of 85 (6%) containing a spray dried clot activator and 11 of 75 (15%) without additives were contaminated. One of 20 (5%) RNALater reagent aliquots and 2 of 50 (4%) of the urine collection containers were contaminated. No Cell Preparation Tube, PaxGene RNA tube, BAL collection tube, cryovial or pipette tip was contaminated.

The results presented highlight a problem in DNA based detection methods for rapid diagnosis of fungal infection. PCR is highly sensitive and appears to reveal the presence of fragments of fungi containing DNA in microbiologically sterile containers. The fill volume of each tube is typically larger than the 1mL of sterile water used here and the results probably overestimate the problem in the clinic. However, blood tubes are often under filled and small volumes are the norm in paediatric practice. Five of the 50 (10%) positive PCR signals were strong (Ct values <34), suggesting that the assay would still be positive after dilution with larger volumes.

The MB assay detects both Aspergillus spp. and some Penicillium spp. and does not discriminate between specific species (unpublished data). The TM assay is specific for A. fumigatus targeting the 28S rDNA region. Agreement between assays on 96% of positive samples reinforces the conclusion that the results are robust (the 2 samples that were TM negative were close to the LOD with the MB assay). It is likely that most of the contaminated tubes contained A. fumigatus DNA. This is problematic in the clinical setting.

Another explanation for contamination is introduction of DNA during extraction or PCR set-up. In this study, the DNA extraction and PCR set up procedures were rigorously controlled using settle plates, negative extraction controls and no-template PCR controls. All controls were culture and PCR negative and it is most likely that the contamination arose from the collection vessels.

This data suggests that between 0 and 18% of blood collection tubes are contaminated with Aspergillus species DNA with possible contamination of urine collection vessels and RNA stabilization reagents. We conclude that development of fungal real-time PCR will require consideration of the ubiquitous nature of fungal flora and DNA and the impact of any contamination on the sensitivity of the technique. This result has serious implications for the development of PCR diagnostics for fungal disease using standard collection vessels.

Acknowledgments

The present work was supported in part by NIH NIAID K24-AI072522 (BDA) and NIH-NIAID N01-AI70023 / HHSN266200700023C (AsTeC).

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Challier S, Boyer S, Abachin E, Berche P. Development of a serum-based Taqman real-time PCR assay for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42 (2):844–846. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.844-846.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen SC, Halliday CL, Meyer W. A review of nucleic acid-based diagnostic tests for systemic mycoses with an emphasis on polymerase chain reaction-based assays. Med Mycol. 2002;40:333–57. doi: 10.1080/mmy.40.4.333.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Denning DW. Invasive aspergillosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:781–803. doi: 10.1086/513943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Herrera ML, Vallor AC, Gelfond JA, Patterson TF, Wickes BL. Strain-dependent variation in 18S ribosomal DNA Copy numbers in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Clin Microb. 2009;47 (5):1325–32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02073-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Loeffler J, Hebart H, Bialek R, Hagmeyer L, Schmidt D, Serey FP, Hartmann M, Eucker J, Einsele H. Contaminations cccurring in fungal PCR assays. J App Microbiol. 1999;37 (4):1200–1202. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.4.1200-1202.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Maschmeyer G, Haas A. The epidemiology and treatment of infections in cancer patients. Int J Antimicrob Ag. 2008;31:193–197. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Menzin J, Meyers JL, Friedman M, Perfect JR, Langston AA, Danna RP, Papadopoulos G. Mortality, length of hospitalization, and costs associated with invasive fungal infections in high-risk patients. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66:1711–7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp080325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Palmer J, Francesconi A, Kasai M, Walsh TJ, Orle K. Sources of False Positive Aspergillus DNA by PCR from Normal Human Blood. 41st Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; Chicago, Ill. Dec 16–19; 2001. abstract no. J-844. [Google Scholar]
  9. Perlin DS, Zhao Y. Molecular diagnostic platforms for detecting Aspergillus. Med Mycol. 2009;47(Suppl 1):S223–32. doi: 10.1080/13693780802126583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tyagi S, Kramer FR. Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization. Nature Biotech. 1996;14:303–8. doi: 10.1038/nbt0396-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES