Skip to main content
BMJ Clinical Evidence logoLink to BMJ Clinical Evidence
. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Leg cramps

Gavin Young 1
PMCID: PMC2907778  PMID: 19445755

Abstract

Introduction

Involuntary, localised leg cramps are common and typically affect the calf muscles at night.

Methods and outcomes

We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for idiopathic leg cramps? What are the effects of treatments for leg cramps in pregnancy? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to September 2008 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).

Results

We found 12 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.

Conclusions

In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: analgesics; anti-epileptic drugs; calcium salts; compression hosiery; magnesium salts; multivitamin and mineral supplements; quinine alone or with theophylline; sodium chloride; and stretching exercises.

Key Points

Involuntary, localised leg cramps are common and typically affect the calf muscles at night.

  • The causes of leg cramps are unclear, but risk factors include: pregnancy; exercise; salt and electrolyte imbalances; disorders affecting peripheral nerves, blood vessels, or muscles; renal dialysis; and some drugs.

Quinine reduces the frequency of idiopathic leg cramps at night compared with placebo, but we don’t know the optimal dose or length of treatment.

  • Adding theophylline to quinine may reduce the frequency of nocturnal leg cramps compared with quinine alone.

CAUTION

About this condition

Definition

Leg cramps are involuntary, localised, and usually painful skeletal muscle contractions, which commonly affect calf muscles. Leg cramps typically occur at night and usually last only seconds to minutes. Leg cramps may be idiopathic (of unknown cause) or may be associated with a definable process or condition such as pregnancy, renal dialysis, or venous insufficiency. This review does not currently cover leg cramps associated with renal dialysis or venous insufficiency.

Incidence/ Prevalence

Leg cramps are common and their incidence increases with age. About half of people attending a general medicine clinic have had leg cramps within 1 month of their visit, and over two-thirds of people over 50 years of age have experienced leg cramps.

Aetiology/ Risk factors

Little is known about the causes of leg cramps. Risk factors include pregnancy, exercise, electrolyte imbalances, salt depletion, renal dialysis, peripheral vascular disease (both venous and arterial), peripheral nerve injury, polyneuropathies, motor neurone disease, muscle diseases, and certain drugs. Other causes of acute calf pain include trauma, DVT (see review on thromboembolism), and ruptured Baker’s cyst.

Prognosis

Leg cramps may cause severe pain and sleep disturbance.

Aims of intervention

To reduce the frequency and severity of attacks of cramp, with minimal adverse effects of treatment.

Outcomes

Leg cramp symptoms (includes frequency, duration, severity of attacks, and number of disturbed nights), adverse effects of treatment.

Methods

Clinical Evidence search and appraisal September 2008. The following databases were used to identify studies for this systematic review: Medline 1966 to September 2008, Embase 1980 to September 2008, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials 2008, Issue 3 (1966 to date of issue). An additional search was carried out of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) — for Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). We also searched for retractions of studies included in the review. Abstracts of the studies retrieved from the initial search were assessed by an information specialist. Selected studies were then sent to the contributor for additional assessment, using pre-determined criteria to identify relevant studies. Study design criteria for inclusion in this review were: published systematic reviews and RCTs in any language. RCTs could be open or blinded, and there was no minimum number of patients or length of follow-up required to include studies. At least 80% of the patients had to be followed up. We included systematic reviews of RCTs and RCTs where harms of an included intervention were studied applying the same study design criteria for inclusion as we did for benefits. In addition, we use a regular surveillance protocol to capture harms alerts from organisations such as the FDA and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which are added to the reviews as required. To aid readability of the numerical data in our reviews, we round many percentages to the nearest whole number. Readers should be aware of this when relating percentages to summary statistics such as relative risks (RRs) and odds ratios (ORs). We have performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions included in this review (see table). The categorisation of the quality of the evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low) reflects the quality of evidence available for our chosen outcomes in our defined populations of interest. These categorisations are not necessarily a reflection of the overall methodological quality of any individual study, because the Clinical Evidence population and outcome of choice may represent only a small subset of the total outcomes reported, and population included, in any individual trial. For further details of how we perform the GRADE evaluation and the scoring system we use, please see our website (www.clinicalevidence.com).

Table.

GRADE Evaluation of interventions for Leg cramps.

Important outcomes Leg cramp symptoms
Studies (Participants) Outcome Comparison Type of evidence Quality Consistency Directness Effect size GRADE Comment
What are the effects of treatments for idiopathic leg cramps?
9 (672) Leg cramp symptoms Quinine versus placebo 4 –2 0 0 +1 Moderate Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and inclusion of small RCTs with weak methods. Effect-size point added for RR <0.5
1 (164) Leg cramp symptoms Quinine plus theophylline versus placebo 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and poor follow-up. Directness point deducted for uncertain assessment of outcome
1 (164) Leg cramp symptoms Quinine plus theophylline versus quinine alone 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and poor follow-up. Directness point deducted for uncertain assessment of outcome
2 (113) Leg cramp symptoms Magnesium citrate versus placebo 4 –3 0 0 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data, incomplete reporting of results, poor crossover methodology, and poor follow-up
1 (27) Leg cramp symptoms Vitamin E versus placebo 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results. Directness point deducted for inclusion only of men
1 (27) Leg cramp symptoms Vitamin E versus quinine 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and uncertain crossover methodology. Directness point deducted for inclusion only of men
1 (191) Leg cramp symptoms Stretching exercises versus passive non-stretching exercises 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and no blinding. Directness point deducted for uncertain benefits from control treatment
What are the effects of treatments for leg cramps in pregnancy?
2 (102) Leg cramp symptoms Calcium salts versus no treatment or vitamin C placebo 4 –2 –1 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and poor blinding. Consistency point deducted for conflicting results. Directness point deducted for uncertain benefits from control treatment
1 (73) Leg cramp symptoms Magnesium salts versus placebo 4 –2 0 0 0 Low Quality points deducted for sparse data and uncertain randomisation methodology
1 (62) Leg cramp symptoms Multivitamin and mineral supplements versus placebo 4 –2 0 –1 0 Very low Quality points deducted for sparse data and poor follow-up. Directness point deducted as study not designed to assess treatment for cramps

We initially allocate 4 points to evidence from RCTs, and 2 points to evidence from observational studies. To attain the final GRADE score for a given comparison, points are deducted or added from this initial score based on preset criteria relating to the categories of quality, directness, consistency, and effect size. Quality: based on issues affecting methodological rigour (e.g., incomplete reporting of results, quasi-randomisation, sparse data [<200 people in the analysis]). Consistency: based on similarity of results across studies. Directness: based on generalisability of population or outcomes. Effect size: based on magnitude of effect as measured by statistics such as relative risk, odds ratio, or hazard ratio.

Glossary

Low-quality evidence

Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.

Moderate-quality evidence

Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.

Very low-quality evidence

Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.

Compression hosiery for venous leg ulcers

Disclaimer

The information contained in this publication is intended for medical professionals. Categories presented in Clinical Evidence indicate a judgement about the strength of the evidence available to our contributors prior to publication and the relevant importance of benefit and harms. We rely on our contributors to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to adhere to describe accepted practices. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. Because of this and regular advances in medical research we strongly recommend that readers' independently verify specified treatments and drugs including manufacturers' guidance. Also, the categories do not indicate whether a particular treatment is generally appropriate or whether it is suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the readers' responsibility to make their own professional judgements, so to appropriately advise and treat their patients. To the fullest extent permitted by law, BMJ Publishing Group Limited and its editors are not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, products liability or otherwise) whether they be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the application of the information in this publication.

References

  • 1.Hall AJ. Cramp and salt balance in ordinary life. Lancet 1947;3:231–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Man-Son-Hing M, Wells G, Lau A. Quinine for nocturnal leg cramps: a meta-analysis including unpublished data. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13:600–606. Search date 1997; primary sources Medline, Embase, Current Contents, and contact with authorities. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Woodfield R, Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B. N-of-1 trials of quinine efficacy in skeletal muscle cramps of the leg. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:181–185. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Coppin RJ, Wicke DM, Little PS. Managing nocturnal leg cramps – calf-stretching exercises and cessation of quinine treatment: a factorial randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55:186–191. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Food and Drug Administration. FDA Medwatch Safety Alert. Quinine products. 2006. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2006/safety06.htm#Quinine (last accessed 20 July 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 6.MHRA. Drug analysis print. Drug name: Quinine. Report run date 23 November 2008. MHRA Available at: http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/public/documents/sentineldocuments/dap_1229939299608.pdf (last accessed 20 July 2010). [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McGee SR. Muscle cramps. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:511–518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gorlich HD, Gablez VE, Steinberg HW. Treatment of nocturnal leg cramps. A multicenter double blind, placebo controlled comparison between the combination of quinine and theophylline ethylene diamine with quinine. Arzneimittelforschung 1991;41:167–175. [In German] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Frusso R, Zarate M, Augustovski F, et al. Magnesium for the treatment of nocturnal leg cramps: a crossover randomized trial. J Fam Pract 1999;48:868–871. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roffe C, Sills S, Crome P, et al. Randomised, cross-over, placebo controlled trial of magnesium citrate in the treatment of chronic persistent leg cramps. Med Sci Monit 2002;8:CR326–CR330. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Connolly PS, Shirley EA, Wasson JH, et al. Treatment of nocturnal leg cramps: a crossover trial of quinine vs vitamin E. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:1877–1880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Young GL, Jewell D. Interventions for leg cramps in pregnancy. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2008. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2001. 11869565 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hammar M, Larsson L, Tegler L. Calcium treatment of leg cramps in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1981;60:345–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hammar M, Berg G, Solheim F, et al. Calcium and magnesium status in pregnant women. A comparison between treatment with calcium and vitamin C in pregnant women with leg cramps. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 1987;57:179–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.
  • 16.Dahle LO, Berg G, Hammar M, et al. The effect of oral magnesium substitution on pregnancy-induced leg cramps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:175–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thauvin E, Fusselier M, Arnaud J, et al. Effects of a multivitamin mineral supplement on zinc and copper status during pregnancy. Biol Trace Elem Res 1992;32:405–414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Robinson M. Cramps in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 1947;54:826–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Shahraki AD. Effects of vitamin E, calcium carbonate and milk of magnesium on muscular cramps in pregnant women. J Med Sci 2006;6:979–983. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mokhtari M, Yaghmaie M, Mohammadi M. The comparison of the therapeutic effect of vitamin E on leg cramps during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Infert 2002;5:42–46. [Google Scholar]
BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Quinine

Summary

Quinine reduces the frequency of idiopathic leg cramps at night compared with placebo, but we don’t know the optimal dose or length of treatment.

Quinine may be associated with cardiac arrhythmias, thrombocytopenia, and severe hypersensitivity reactions. It is a known teratogen and the risks are not outweighed by any potential benefits of its use in pregnancy.

Benefits and harms

Quinine versus placebo:

We found one systematic review (search date 1997, 8 RCTs, 659 people) and one subsequent RCT.

Leg cramp symptoms

Quinine compared with placebo Quinine is more effective at reducing leg cramps over 4 weeks (moderate-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

Systematic review
659 people
8 RCTs in this analysis
Reduction in frequency of nocturnal leg cramps over 4 months
with quinine
with placebo

ARR for quinine v placebo 3.60 cramps/month
95% CI 2.15 cramps/month to 5.05 cramps/month
RR 0.21
95% CI 0.12 to 0.30
Moderate effect size quinine

RCT
Crossover design
13 people aged at least 75 years taking quinine for leg cramps Average number of leg cramps per person
12.9 with quinine
36.5 with placebo

Significance not assessed

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

Systematic review
659 people
8 RCTs in this analysis
Tinnitus
20/659 (3%) with quinine
7/659 (1%) with placebo

RR 2.86
95% CI 1.22 to 6.71
NNH 50
95% CI 27 to 230
Moderate effect size placebo

RCT
Crossover design
13 people aged at least 75 years taking quinine for leg cramps Adverse effects
with quinine
with placebo
Absolute results not reported

P >0.05
Not significant

Quinine versus vitamin E:

See option on vitamin E.

Quinine alone versus quinine plus theophylline:

See option on quinine plus theophylline.

Dose and length of treatment:

We found no RCTs specifically assessing the optimal dose of quinine or length of treatment. We found one open-label RCT which gave additional information on treatment duration; however, it did not meet our inclusion criteria (see comment for further details).

Further information on studies

Of 10 people (77%) who completed the trial, 3/10 (30%) had a significant reduction in the total number of cramps over 12 weeks when taking quinine compared with when taking placebo (P >0.05). Six people (60%) had lower rates of cramps when taking quinine, but the difference compared with when taking placebo was not significant (P >0.05). In one person (10%), there was no reduction in cramps when taking quinine compared with when taking placebo.

Comment

Dose and length of treatment:

We found one open-label RCT (191 people aged at least 60 years who had received quinine for leg cramps in the previous 3 months), which did not directly assess the duration of treatment, but assessed stretching exercises, also compared advice to stop taking quinine for 6 weeks versus no advice. All participants who were advised to stop quinine were told that, at 6 weeks, they could decide whether to resume medication. The RCT found that, at 12 weeks, significantly more people who had been advised to stop quinine had stopped medication compared with people not receiving advice (OR 3.32, 95% CI 1.37 to 8.06; absolute numbers not reported).

Drug safety alert:

The FDA has advised manufacturers to stop marketing unapproved drug products containing quinine, because of serious safety concerns. The FDA has received 665 reports of serious adverse events associated with quinine use since 1969, including 93 deaths. Among the adverse effects of quinine are cardiac arrhythmias, thrombocytopenia, and severe hypersensitivity reactions. Because of these serious adverse effects, and because the toxic dose for quinine is only slightly higher than the therapeutic dose, the FDA has suggested that people should be warned against treating their leg cramps with quinine products. The FDA alert relates to non-prescription products containing quinine; in the UK, quinine is only available on prescription. The UK spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting scheme (Yellow Card Scheme) has reported 16 deaths associated with quinine between 1965 and 2008 and has not issued a drug safety alert in response to their findings.

Clinical guide:

The results of the RCT assessing advice to stop taking quinine suggest that it is possible to advise people who have been taking quinine long term that they may be able to stop medication without any increase in cramps. Quinine is a known teratogen in high doses and, for treatment of cramp, the risk outweighs any possible benefit in pregnancy. Elevated quinine levels may cause cinchonism, a syndrome caused by derivatives of cinchona bark. This usually presents with nausea, vomiting, headache, tinnitus, deafness, vertigo, and visual disturbance. See also comment on quinine plus theophylline.

Substantive changes

Quinine A drug safety alert has been issued by the FDA advising manufacturers to stop marketing unapproved drug products containing quinine, because of serious safety concerns. Among the adverse effects of quinine are cardiac arrhythmias, thrombocytopenia, severe hypersensitivity reactions, and death. Because of these serious adverse effects, and because the toxic dose for quinine is only slightly higher than the therapeutic dose, the FDA has suggested that people should be warned against treating their leg cramps with quinine products. The FDA alert relates to non-prescription drugs; in the UK, quinine is only available on prescription. In contrast to the FDA, the UK spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting scheme (Yellow Card Scheme) has reported only 16 deaths associated with quinine between 1965 and 2008 and has not issued a drug safety alert in response to their findings. However, in line with the concerns regarding adverse effects, categorisation of quinine changed from Beneficial to Trade-off between benefits and harms.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Quinine plus theophylline

Summary

Adding theophylline to quinine may reduce the frequency of nocturnal leg cramps compared with quinine alone.

Theophylline is associated with arrhythmias, nausea, and agitation. Quinine may be associated with cardiac arrhythmias, thrombocytopenia, and severe hypersensitivity reactions.

Benefits and harms

Quinine plus theophylline versus placebo:

We found no systematic review. We found one single-blind RCT.

Leg cramp symptoms

Quinine compared with placebo Quinine plus theophylline may be more effective at reducing idiopathic nocturnal leg cramps at 2 weeks (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
3-armed trial
164 people Proportion of people rating treatment as "good" or "very good"
34/39 (87%) with quinine (260 mg daily) plus theophylline (195 mg daily)
17/42 (40%) with placebo

P <0.001 for quinine plus theophylline v placebo
See further information on studies for methodological limitations
Effect size not calculated quinine plus theophylline

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

RCT
3-armed trial
164 people Adverse effects
with quinine (260 mg daily) plus theophylline (195 mg daily)
with placebo

Quinine plus theophylline versus quinine alone:

We found no systematic review. We found one single-blind RCT.

Leg cramp symptoms

Quinine plus theophylline compared with quinine alone Quinine plus theophylline may be more effective at reducing idiopathic nocturnal leg cramps at 2 weeks (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
3-armed trial
164 people Proportion of people rating treatment as "good" or "very good" 2 weeks
34/39 (87%) with quinine (260 mg daily) plus theophylline (195 mg daily)
28/45 (62%) with quinine (260 mg daily) alone

P <0.001 for quinine plus theophylline v quinine alone
See further information on studies for methodological limitations
Effect size not calculated quinine plus theophylline

RCT
3-armed trial
164 people Change from baseline in mean number of nights affected by cramp 2 weeks
from 4.7 nights to 1.1 nights with quinine (260 mg daily) plus theophylline (195 mg daily)
from 4.8 nights to 2.2 nights with quinine (260 mg daily) alone

P = 0.009 for quinine plus theophylline v quinine alone
See further information on studies for methodological limitations
Effect size not calculated quinine plus theophylline

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

RCT
3-armed trial
164 people Adverse effects 2 weeks
with quinine (260 mg daily) plus theophylline (195 mg daily)
with quinine (260 mg daily) alone

Further information on studies

The results of the RCT should be treated with caution, as it did not specify criteria to categorise outcomes as “good” or “very good”, and pooled the results only for people who received treatment for at least 4 out of 14 days (126 people out of 164 enrolled) without using an intention-to-treat analysis.

Comment

Theophylline has a narrow therapeutic margin and adverse events associated with toxic doses include arrhythmias, nausea, and agitation.

Drug safety alert:

see comment for quinine.

Substantive changes

Quinine plus theophylline A drug safety alert has been issued by the FDA advising manufacturers to stop marketing unapproved drug products containing quinine because of serious safety concerns. Among the adverse effects of quinine are cardiac arrhythmias, thrombocytopenia, severe hypersensitivity reactions, and death. Because of these serious adverse effects, and because the toxic dose for quinine is only slightly higher than the therapeutic dose, the FDA has suggested that people should be warned against treating their leg cramps with quinine products. The FDA alert relates to non-prescription drugs; in the UK, quinine is only available on prescription. In contrast to the FDA, the UK spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting scheme (Yellow Card Scheme) has reported only 16 deaths associated with quinine between 1965 and 2008 and has not issued a drug safety alert in response to their findings. However, in line with the concerns regarding adverse effects, categorisation of quinine plus theophylline changed from Likely to be beneficial to Trade-off between benefits and harms.

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Analgesics

Summary

We found no clinically important results from RCTs about the effects of analgesics on idiopathic leg cramps.

Benefits and harms

Analgesics versus placebo:

We found no systematic reviews or RCTs

Further information on studies

None.

Comment

None.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Anti-epileptic drugs

Summary

We found no clinically important results from RCTs about the effects of anti-epileptic drugs on idiopathic leg cramps.

Benefits and harms

Anti-epileptic drugs versus placebo:

We found no systematic review or RCTs.

Further information on studies

None.

Comment

Harms associated with the use of anti-epileptic drugs are well described (see review on epilepsy).

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Magnesium salts for idiopathic leg cramps

Summary

We don't know whether magnesium citrate is more effective than placebo at reducing idiopathic leg in the short term.

Benefits and harms

Magnesium citrate versus placebo:

We found two crossover RCTs.

Leg cramp symptoms

Magnesium citrate compared with placebo Magnesium citrate may be no more effective at reducing idiopathic leg cramps at 2 to 4 weeks (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
Crossover design
45 people with at least six cramps during the previous month Number of cramps 1 month
11.8 with oral magnesium citrate (900 mg twice daily)
11.1 with placebo

P = 0.59
See further information on studies for methodological limitations
Not significant

RCT
Crossover design
68 people with at least two leg cramps a week for 3 months Frequency of leg cramps 4 weeks
with oral magnesium citrate (equivalent to 300 mg magnesium daily)
with placebo
Absolute results reported graphically

P = 0.07
Completer analysis of results after crossover
People in both groups had a significant reduction in leg cramps from baseline (P = 0.008).
Not significant

RCT
Crossover design
68 people with at least two leg cramps a week for 3 months Severity of leg cramps 4 weeks
with oral magnesium citrate (equivalent to 300 mg magnesium daily)
with placebo
Absolute results not reported

Reported as not significant
P value not reported
Completer analysis of results after crossover
People in both groups had a significant reduction in leg cramps from baseline (P = 0.008).
Not significant

RCT
Crossover design
68 people with at least two leg cramps a week for 3 months Duration of leg cramps 4 weeks
with oral magnesium citrate (equivalent to 300 mg magnesium daily)
with placebo
Absolute results not reported

Reported as not significant
P value not reported
Completer analysis of results after crossover
People in both groups had a significant reduction in leg cramps from baseline (P = 0.008).
Not significant

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

RCT
Crossover design
45 people with at least six cramps during the previous month Diarrhoea, nausea, and vomiting
10.7% with oral magnesium citrate (900 mg twice daily)
10.1% with placebo

Significance not assessed
See further information on studies for methodological limitations

RCT
Crossover design
68 people with at least two leg cramps a week for 3 months Diarrhoea
30% with oral magnesium citrate (equivalent to 300 mg magnesium daily)
17% with placebo
Absolute numbers not reported

P = 0.1
Not significant

Further information on studies

The RCT reported that there was a significant period-effect bias. Both treatment and control groups improved in number of cramps over time (P = 0.027) irrespective of sequence of treatment.

Comment

Both RCTs found a significant reduction in frequency of leg cramps, regardless of treatment group. Both presented results after crossover, which are difficult to interpret owing to the potential effects of carry-over between treatment phases. The second RCT had a high withdrawal rate (21/68 [31%]), which may have affected the reliability of its results. Large, non-crossover RCTs are needed.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Vitamin E for idiopathic leg cramps

Summary

We don’t know whether vitamin E reduces leg cramps

Benefits and harms

Vitamin E versus placebo:

We found no systematic review. We found one crossover RCT.

Leg cramp symptoms

Vitamin E compared with placebo Vitamin E may be no more effective at reducing nocturnal cramps (low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
27 men Median number of nights with leg cramps
14 nights with vitamin E (800 U at bedtime)
15 nights with placebo

P >0.05
Not significant

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
27 men Adverse effects
with vitamin E (800 U at bedtime)
with placebo

Vitamin E versus quinine:

We found no systematic review but found one crossover RCT.

Leg cramp symptoms

Vitamin E compared with quinine We don’t know how vitamin E and quinine compare at reducing the frequency or severity of leg cramps (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
27 men Median number of nights with leg cramps
14 nights with vitamin E (800 U at bedtime)
9 nights with quinine (200 mg at supper and 300 mg at bedtime)

Significance not assessed

RCT
Crossover design
3-armed trial
27 men Severity of leg cramps
with vitamin E (800 U at bedtime)
with quinine (200 mg at supper and 300 mg at bedtime)
Absolute results not reported

Significance not assessed

Adverse effects

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Further information on studies

None.

Comment

None.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Compression hosiery

Summary

We found no clinically important results from RCTs about the effects of compression hosiery in people with idiopathic leg cramps.

Benefits and harms

Compression hosiery versus no compression hosiery:

We found no systematic reviews or RCTs.

Further information on studies

None.

Comment

Clinical guide:

Compression hosiery may ease the calf discomfort of venous insufficiency, making it potentially useful for treating leg cramps.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Stretching exercises

Summary

We found no direct information about whether stretching exercises are better than no treatment.

Benefits and harms

Stretching exercises versus passive non-stretching exercises:

We found one open-label RCT.

Leg cramp symptoms

Stretching exercises compared with passive non-stretching exercises Stretching standing exercises may be as effective as passive non-stretching “lying” exercises at reducing idiopathic leg cramps (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
4-armed trial
191 people aged at least 60 years who had received quinine for leg cramps in the previous 3 months Number of cramps felt 8 to 12 weeks
with stretching “standing” exercises with or without advice to discontinue quinine
with passive non-stretching “lying” exercises with or without advice to discontinue quinine

Mean difference in number of cramps +1.95
95% CI –3.01 to +6.90
P = 0.44
It is possible that the control treatment had a beneficial effect, see comment
Not significant

Adverse effects

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Further information on studies

All groups were taught the exercises by a nurse and told that, at 6 weeks, they could decide whether to continue exercise or, for those advised to stop quinine, to resume medication.

Comment

Clinical guide:

It has been widely assumed that stretching exercises would reduce the number and severity (or both) of cramps, possibly because of the common experience that stretching a muscle aborts an actual attack. Although the RCT we found seemed to show no benefit, it is possible that the passive “lying” exercises were effective, and the researchers had inadvertently found an active sham treatment.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Calcium salts

Summary

We don’t know whether calcium salts reduce leg cramps in pregnant women.

Benefits and harms

Calcium salts versus no treatment or vitamin C placebo:

We found one systematic review (search date 2001), which included two RCTs.

Leg cramp symptoms

Calcium salts compared with no treatment or vitamin C placebo We don’t know how calcium salts compare with no treatment or with vitamin C “placebo” in treating leg cramps in pregnant women (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
42 pregnant women
In review
Lack of improvement in cramps
2/21 (10%) with calcium 100 mg twice daily
18/21 (86%) with no treatment

OR 0.05
95% CI 0.02 to 0.17
See comment for details of methodological limitations
Large effect size calcium

RCT
60 pregnant women
In review
Lack of improvement in cramps
11/30 (37%) with calcium 100 mg twice daily
8/30 (27%) with vitamin C

OR 1.58
95% CI 0.54 to 4.63
See comment for details of methodological limitations
Not significant

Adverse effects

No data from the following reference on this outcome.

Comment

The lack of a placebo group in the first RCT makes the results difficult to interpret, as the benefits seen with calcium salts might have been due in part to a placebo effect. In the second RCT, vitamin C was used as a placebo, as it was not known to have an effect on leg cramps. However, there was a marked difference in the response of the control group in the two included RCTs. In the first RCT, 18/21 (86%) women with no treatment had no improvement in cramps. In the second RCT, 8/30 (27%) women with vitamin C had no improvement. It is unclear whether this difference was due to a beneficial effect of vitamin C on leg cramps, differences between the population in the RCTs, or another cause.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Magnesium salts for leg cramps in pregnancy

Summary

We don’t know whether calcium salts, sodium chloride, or multivitamins and mineral supplements reduce leg cramps in pregnant women.

Benefits and harms

Magnesium salts versus placebo:

We found one systematic review (search date 2001, 1 RCT).

Leg cramp symptoms

Magnesium salts compared with placebo Magnesium salts may be more effective at 3 weeks at reducing leg cramps in pregnant women (low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
73 pregnant women 22 to 36 weeks’ gestation
In review
Proportion of women reporting persistent leg cramps 3 weeks
23/34 (68%) with chewable magnesium tablets (magnesium lactate, magnesium citrate)
33/35 (94%) with chewable placebo tablets

RR 0.72
95% CI 0.56 to 0.92
See further information on studies for methodological limitations
Small effect size magnesium tablets

RCT
73 pregnant women 22 to 36 weeks’ gestation
In review
Proportion of women rating themselves “entirely free of symptoms” or “considerably improved” 3 weeks
27/34 (79%) with chewable magnesium tablets (magnesium lactate, magnesium citrate)
14/35 (40%) with chewable placebo tablets

P = 0.0002
See further information on studies for methodological limitations.
Effect size not calculated magnesium tablets

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

RCT
73 pregnant women 22 to 36 weeks’ gestation
In review
Adverse effects
with chewable magnesium tablets (magnesium lactate, magnesium citrate)
with chewable placebo tablets

Further information on studies

The RCT did not describe the method of randomisation, and symptoms were assessed after 3 weeks of treatment, with no further follow-up.

Comment

None.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Multivitamins and mineral supplements

Summary

We don’t know how multivitamin and mineral supplements and placebo compare at reducing leg cramps in pregnant women.

Benefits and harms

Multivitamin and mineral supplements versus placebo:

We found one systematic review (search date 2001, 1 RCT).

Leg cramp symptoms

Multivitamin and mineral supplements compared with placebo We don’t know how multivitamin and mineral supplements and placebo compare at reducing leg cramps in pregnant women (very low-quality evidence).

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Leg cramp symptoms

RCT
62 pregnant women
In review
Proportion of women reporting persistent leg cramps ninth month of pregnancy
2/11 (18%) with multivitamin plus mineral tablet (containing 12 different ingredients)
10/18 (56%) with placebo

OR 0.23
95% CI 0.05 to 1.01
The RCT had a high dropout rate, and may be underpowered. See further information on studies for full details
Not significant

Adverse effects

Ref (type) Population Outcome, Interventions Results and statistical analysis Effect size Favours
Adverse effects

RCT
62 pregnant women
In review
Adverse effects
with multivitamin plus mineral tablet (containing 12 different ingredients)
with placebo

Further information on studies

The RCT was primarily undertaken to examine the effects of a multivitamin plus mineral supplement on zinc and copper levels in maternal plasma during pregnancy. The supplement contained zinc gluconate, copper gluconate, iron gluconate, magnesium lactate, chromium chloride, ascorbic acid, thiamine nitrate, riboflavin (riboflavine), pyridoxal chlorhydrate, folic acid, cyanocobalamin, and alpha tocopherol acetate. Methodological limitations The RCT may have lacked power to detect a clinically important difference between treatment groups given that the confidence interval lies close to significance. In total, 29/62 (48%) women were assessed for cramp at 9 months’ gestation. The high withdrawal rate was not explained.

Comment

None.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Sodium chloride

Summary

We found no clinically important information from RCTs about sodium chloride in the treatment of pregnant women with leg cramps.

Benefits and harms

Sodium chloride versus placebo:

We found one systematic review (search date 2001), which identified no RCTs (see comment).

Further information on studies

None.

Comment

The review identified one controlled clinical trial, which was of poor quality. Initially, sodium chloride and calcium lactate were given to alternate participants. It was then decided, based on the difference between the results of the two treatments, to use two additional control groups (saccharin and no treatment). The dose of sodium chloride changed during the course of the study.

Substantive changes

No new evidence

BMJ Clin Evid. 2009 Mar 26;2009:1113.

Vitamin E for leg cramps in pregnancy

Summary

We found no clinically important information from RCTs about vitamin E in the treatment of pregnant women with leg cramps.

Benefits and harms

Vitamin E versus placebo:

We found one systematic review (search date 2001), which identified no RCTs of vitamin E in pregnant women with leg cramps. We found no subsequent RCTs that met Clinical Evidence inclusion criteria.

Further information on studies

None.

Comment

We found one non-systematic review, which identified one trial, which we were unable to obtain through any of the sources available to us. Therefore, we were unable to assess it for possible inclusion in the review.

Substantive changes

Vitamin E for leg cramps in pregnancy New option for which we identified no RCTs. Categorised as Unknown effectiveness.


Articles from BMJ Clinical Evidence are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES