Abstract
Introduction
Loss of more than 500 mL of blood is usually caused by failure of the uterus to contract fully after delivery of the placenta, and occurs in over 10% of deliveries, with a 1% mortality rate worldwide. Other causes of postpartum haemorrhage include retained placental tissue, lacerations to the genital tract, and coagulation disorders. Uterine atony is more likely in women who have had a general anaesthetic or oxytocin, an overdistended uterus, a prolonged or precipitous labour, or who are of high parity.
Methods and outcomes
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of drug and of non-drug interventions to prevent primary postpartum haemorrhage? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to September 2007 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Results
We found 29 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
Conclusions
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: active management of the third stage of labour, carboprost injection, controlled cord traction, ergot compounds (ergometrine/methylergotamine), immediate breastfeeding, misoprostol (oral, rectal, sublingual, or vaginal), oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations, oxytocin, prostaglandin E2 compounds, and uterine massage.
Key Points
Loss of more than 500 mL of blood is usually caused by failure of the uterus to contract fully after delivery of the placenta, and occurs in over 10% of deliveries with a 1% mortality rate worldwide.
Other causes of postpartum haemorrhage include retained placental tissue, lacerations to the genital tract and coagulation disorders.
Uterine atony is more likely in women who have had a general anaesthetic or oxytocin, an over-distended uterus, a prolonged or precipitous labour, or who are of high parity.
Active management of the third stage of labour, with controlled cord traction, early cord clamping plus drainage and prophylactic oxytocic agents, reduces the risk of postpartum haemorrhage and its complications.
Active management increases nausea, vomiting, and headache, but generally improves maternal satisfaction.
Controlled cord traction may reduce the risk of retained placenta and need for medical treatment, and can be used in any resource setting.
Uterine massage is often used to prevent postpartum haemorrhage, and is supported by a single RCT. It can be used in any resource setting.
Oxytocin has been shown to effectively reduce the risk of postpartum haemorrhage compared with placebo.
A combination of oxytocin plus ergometrine may be slightly more effective than oxytocin alone, although there are more adverse effects.
Ergot alkaloids seem as effective as oxytocin, but are also associated with adverse effects including nausea, placenta retention, and hypertension.
Prostaglandin treatments vary in their efficacy, but are all associated with adverse effects.
Carboprost and prostaglandin E2 compounds may be as effective as oxytocin and ergot compounds, but have gastrointestinal adverse effects, such as diarrhoea.
Misoprostol seems ineffective compared with placebo when administered orally, rectally, or vaginally, and is associated with adverse effects including shivering and fever.
Sublingually administered misoprostol may be more effective than placebo in preventing postpartum heamorrhage (evidenced by a single RCT). Sublingual misoprostol has similar effects to injected agents, but is associated with more adverse effects. Confirmatory data would be helpful, as these results differ substantially from the many RCTs on other modes of administration of misoprostol, and it is unclear if there is something unique about sublingual administration.
When available, oxytocin, ergometrine, or combinations are preferred to misoprostol, as misoprostol seems less effective, and is associated with more adverse effects. Sublingual administration is the preferred route for misoprostol.
About this condition
Definition
Postpartum haemorrhage is characterised by an estimated blood loss greater than 500 mL. The leading cause of postpartum haemorrhage is uterine atony — the failure of the uterus to contract fully after delivery of the placenta. Postpartum haemorrhage is divided into immediate (primary) and delayed (secondary). Primary postpartum haemorrhage occurs within the first 24 hours after delivery, whereas secondary postpartum haemorrhage occurs between 24 hours and 6 weeks after delivery. This review addresses the effects of strategies for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal delivery in low- and high-risk women, specifically looking at strategies to prevent uterine atony. Future updates will examine strategies to prevent postpartum haemorrhage due to other causes, as well as treatment strategies.
Incidence/ Prevalence
The WHO reports that obstetric haemorrhage causes 127,000 deaths annually worldwide, and is the world’s leading cause of maternal mortality. Nearly all of these deaths are due to postpartum haemorrhages, which occur nearly 14 million times each year. In Africa, haemorrhage is estimated to be responsible for 30% of all maternal deaths. The imbalance between resource-rich and resource-poor areas probably stems from a combination of: increased prevalence of risk factors such as grand multiparity, lack of safe blood banking, no routine use of prophylaxis against haemorrhage, and lack of measures for drug and surgical management of atony.
Aetiology/ Risk factors
In addition to uterine atony, immediate postpartum haemorrhage is frequently caused by: retained placental tissue; trauma such as laceration of the perineum, vagina, or cervix; rupture of the uterus; or coagulopathy. Risk factors for uterine atony include: use of general anaesthetics; an over-distended uterus, particularly from multiple gestations, a large fetus, or polyhydramnios; prolonged labour; precipitous labour; use of oxytocin for labour induction or augmentation; high parity; chorioamnionitis; or history of atony in a previous pregnancy.
Prognosis
Most postpartum haemorrhage, particularly in Europe and the USA, is well tolerated by women. However, in low-resource settings, where women may already be significantly anaemic during pregnancy, blood loss of 500 mL is significant. Although pregnancy-related death is rare in the USA, postpartum haemorrhage accounts for 17% of deaths. Maternal death is 50-100 times more frequent in resource-poor countries, and postpartum haemorrhage is responsible for a similar proportion of deaths as in the USA. Other significant morbidities associated with postpartum haemorrhage include renal failure, respiratory failure, multiple organ failure, need for transfusion, need for surgery including dilatation and curettage, and, rarely, hysterectomy. Some women with large blood loss will later develop Sheehan's syndrome.
Aims of intervention
To prevent death; to reduce volume of blood loss, need for manual removal of placenta, need for transfusion, and need for medical or surgical treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.
Outcomes
Primary outcomes include maternal mortality, serious maternal morbidity including need for admission to an intensive care unit, renal failure, respiratory failure, multiple organ failure, need for additional medical (e.g. drugs like oxytocin, blood transfusions) or surgical (e.g. hysterectomy, hypogastric artery ligation, uterine curettage) treatment. Secondary outcomes include the mother's ability to care for the newborn, ability to breastfeed, patient satisfaction, volume of blood loss (estimated by drop in haemoglobin or haematocrit, or measured by direct collection). Adverse effects of postpartum haemorrhage include retained placental tissue, anaemia, Sheehan's syndrome, and uterine inversion.
Methods
Clinical Evidence search and appraisal September 2007. The following databases were used to identify studies for this review: Medline 1966 to September 2007, Embase 1980 to September 2007, and The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Additional searches were carried out using these websites: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) — for all databases, Turning Research into Practice (TRIP), and NICE. Abstracts of the studies retrieved were assessed independently by two information specialists using predetermined criteria to identify relevant studies. Study design criteria for inclusion in this review were: published systematic reviews and RCTs in any language (including "open" studies) and containing at least 40 people of whom more than 80% were followed up. There was no minimum length of follow-up required to include studies. The only ergot compound that we searched for was ergometrine/methergine (ergonovine, methylergonovine, ergotrate, methylergometrine, ergotamine). In addition, we use a regular surveillance protocol to capture harms alerts from organisations such as the FDA and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, which are continually added to the review as required. We have performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions included in this review (see table ). To aid readability of the numerical data in our reviews, we round many percentages to the nearest whole number. Readers should be aware of this when relating percentages to summary statistics such as RRs and ORs.
Table.
GRADE evaluation of interventions for postpartum haemorrhage: prevention
| Important outcomes | Morbidity, need for further interventions, mortality, adverse effects | ||||||||
| Number of studies (participants) | Outcome | Comparison | Type of evidence | Quality | Consistency | Directness | Effect size | GRADE | Comment |
| What are the effects of non-drug interventions to prevent primary postpartum haemorrhage? | |||||||||
| At least 5 RCTs (at least 6477 women) | Morbidity | Active management v expectant management alone or combined with oxytocin | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | Effect-size point added for RR less than 0.5 |
| At least 5 RCTs (at least 6477 women) | Need for further interventions | Active management v expectant management alone or combined with oxytocin | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| At least 5 RCTs (at least 6477 women) | Adverse effects | Active management v expectant management alone or combined with oxytocin | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 2 (1948) | Morbidity | Controlled cord traction v minimal intervention | 4 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 0 | Low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results. Directness point deducted for differences in timing and mode of oxytocin administration |
| 1 (477) | Morbidity | Controlled cord traction plus immediate cord drainage v expectant management | 4 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting. Consistency point deducted for lack of consistent benefit |
| 1 (477) | Need for further interventions | Controlled cord traction plus immediate cord drainage v expectant management | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 1 (200) | Morbidity | Uterine massage v routine active management | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 1 (200) | Need for further interventions | Uterine massage v routine active management | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| What are the effects of drug interventions to prevent primary postpartum haemorrhage? | |||||||||
| At least 7 RCTs (at least 3323 women) | Morbidity | Oxytocin v placebo/no intervention | 4 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality point deducted for inclusion of quasi-randomised trials. Consistency point deducted for lack of consistent benefit |
| 5 RCTs (at 2327 women) | Need for further interventions | Oxytocin v placebo/no intervention | 4 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for incomplete reporting of results and for inclusion of quasi-randomised trial |
| At least 7 RCTs (at least 5030 women) | Morbidity | Oxytocin v ergot compounds | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for inclusion of quasi-randomised trial |
| At least 4 RCTs (at least 3770 women) | Need for further interventions | Oxytocin v ergot compounds | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for inclusion of quasi-randomised trial |
| 3 (445) | Morbidity | Carboprost injection v ergot compounds | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 2 (at least 529 women) | Morbidity | Carboprost injection v oxytocin plus ergometrine | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting |
| At least 3 RCTs (at least 3409 women) | Morbidity | Ergot compounds v placebo/no intervention | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
| 2 RCTs (at least 2409 women) | Need for further interventions | Ergot compounds v placebo/no intervention | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting of results |
| At least 4 RCTs and 1 CCT (at least 2891 women) | Morbidity | Oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations v ergot compounds | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for inclusion of controlled trial |
| At least 1 RCT and 1 CCT (at least 1927 women) | Need for further interventions | Oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations v ergot compounds | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for inclusion of controlled trial |
| At least 5 RCTs and 1 CCT (at least 9332 women) | Morbidity | Oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations v oxytocin alone | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for inclusion of controlled trial |
| At least 5 RCTs and 1 CCT (at least 9332 women) | Need for further interventions | Oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations v oxytocin | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for inclusion of controlled trial |
| 1 (46) | Morbidity | Sulprostone injection v placebo | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
| 1 (46) | Need for further interventions | Sulprostone injection v placebo | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
| 1 (51) | Morbidity | Sulprostone injection v oxytocin | 4 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting |
| 1 (661) | Morbidity | Sublingual misoprostol v placebo/no intervention | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for incomplete reporting |
| 2 (150) | Morbidity | Sublingual misoprostol v oxytocin | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
| 1 (100) | Need for further interventions | Sublingual misoprostol v oxytocin | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
| 3 (370) | Morbidity | Sublingual misoprostol v ergometrine | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 2 (320) | Need for further interventions | Sublingual misoprostol v ergometrine | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 1 (60) | Morbidity | Sublingual misoprostol v oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations | 4 | −2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results |
| At least 7 RCTs (at least 5153 women) | Morbidity | Oral misoprostol v placebo/no intervention | 4 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 0 | Low | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results. Directness point deducted for using ergometrine control as ‘no intervention’ |
| At least 7 RCTs (at least 1620 women) | Need for further interventions | Oral misoprostol v placebo/no intervention | 4 | 0 | 0 | −1 | 0 | Moderate | Directness point deducted for using ergometrine control as ‘no intervention’ |
| 2 (2849) | Mortality | Oral misoprostol v placebo/no intervention | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 3 (at least 2423 women) | Morbidity | Oral misoprostol v ergot compounds | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 3 (at least 2223 women) | Need for further interventions | Oral misoprostol v ergot compounds | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 13 (at least 25145 women) | Morbidity | Oral misoprostol v oxytocin | 4 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
| 11 (at least 24310 women) | Need for further interventions | Oral misoprostol v oxytocin | 4 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
| 4 (20199) | Mortality | Oral misoprostol v oxytocin | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 4 (3805) | Morbidity | Oral misoprostol v oxytocin/ ergometrine combinations | 4 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
| 4 (3805) | Need for further interventions | Oral misoprostol v oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations | 4 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
| 1 (542) | Morbidity | Rectal misoprostol v placebo/no intervention | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 1 (546) | Need for further interventions | Rectal misoprostol v placebo/no intervention | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 3 (1780) | Morbidity | Rectal misoprostol v oxytocin | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | High | |
| 4 (2013) | Need for further interventions | Rectal misoprostol v oxytocin | 4 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
| 2 (1262) | Morbidity | Rectal misoprostol v oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations | 4 | 0 | −1 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Consistency point deducted for conflicting results |
| 1 (798) | Need for further interventions | Rectal misoprostol v oxytocin plus ergometrine combinations | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | High | Effect-size point added for RR between 0.5 to 0.2 |
| 1 (120) | Morbidity | Rectal misoprostol v carboprost injection | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Moderate | Quality point deducted for sparse data |
| 1 (120) | Need for further interventions | Rectal misoprostol v carboprost injection | 4 | −1 | 0 | 0 | +2 | High | Quality point deducted for sparse data. Effect-size points added for RR greater than 5 |
| 1 (100) | Morbidity | Vaginal misoprostol v placebo/no intervention | 4 | −2 | 0 | −1 | 0 | Very low | Quality points deducted for sparse data and incomplete reporting of results. Directness point deducted for no direct comparison between groups |
Type of evidence: 4 = RCT; 2 = ObservationalConsistency: similarity of results across studies Directness: generalisability of population or outcomes Effect size: based on relative risk or odds ratio
Glossary
- Active management
Management of the third stage of labour through a combination of interventions, usually including: immediate cord clamping, cutting, and drainage; controlled cord traction; and use of an oxytocic agent (oxytocin, a fixed combination of oxytocin plus ergometrine, ergot compound, etc.).
- Controlled cord traction
involves applying traction to the umbilical cord after the uterus has begun to contract. This can be done constantly or intermittently, usually every few minutes.
- Ergot compounds
Naturally occurring alkaloids that cause uterine contraction. Available for clinical use as ergometrine, methylergonovine, and methergine.
- Expectant management
Management of the third stage by passive means. No active interventions such as oxytocic administration or cord traction are used. In general, the placenta is allowed to be delivered by a combination of gravity and natural uterine contractions, sometimes in conjunction with nipple stimulation.
- High-quality evidence
Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
- Immediate cord drainage
Allowing the blood in the placenta to drain from the cut end of the umbilical cord immediately after the cord is clamped and cut.
- Low-quality evidence
Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
- Manual placenta removal
Removal of the placenta by a hand placed through the vagina into the uterus. It is usually performed for retained placental tissue or with postpartum haemorrhage occurring before delivery of the placenta.
- Moderate-quality evidence
Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
- Oxytocic agent
Any agent that makes the uterus contract.
- Oxytocin
Peptide hormone endogenously synthesised in the hypothalamus (supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei) and released from the posterior pituitary, and important for uterine contractility. Given either intramuscularly or intravenously for the induction or augmentation of labour, and the prevention or treatment of postpartum haemorrhage.
- Retained placental tissue
Placenta that has not been delivered within a specified length of time, often 30 minutes, from time of the delivery of the baby.
- Sheehan's syndrome
is caused by necrosis of the pituitary gland with associated hypopituitarism, resulting from severe postpartum haemorrhage. Although it can cause hypotension and shock immediately postpartum, in most cases the onset is slower – days, weeks, or even years later. Common features are lack of lactation postpartum, amenorrhoea, loss of pubic hair, weight loss, and lethargy. Although increasingly rare in the western world, it is one of the most common causes of hypopituitarism in resource-poor countries.
- Uterine massage
involves manually rubbing the uterine fundus through the abdominal wall immediately after birth.
- Very low-quality evidence
Any estimate of effect is very uncertain.
Disclaimer
The information contained in this publication is intended for medical professionals. Categories presented in Clinical Evidence indicate a judgement about the strength of the evidence available to our contributors prior to publication and the relevant importance of benefit and harms. We rely on our contributors to confirm the accuracy of the information presented and to adhere to describe accepted practices. Readers should be aware that professionals in the field may have different opinions. Because of this and regular advances in medical research we strongly recommend that readers' independently verify specified treatments and drugs including manufacturers' guidance. Also, the categories do not indicate whether a particular treatment is generally appropriate or whether it is suitable for a particular individual. Ultimately it is the readers' responsibility to make their own professional judgements, so to appropriately advise and treat their patients.To the fullest extent permitted by law, BMJ Publishing Group Limited and its editors are not responsible for any losses, injury or damage caused to any person or property (including under contract, by negligence, products liability or otherwise) whether they be direct or indirect, special, incidental or consequential, resulting from the application of the information in this publication.
References
- 1.World Health organization. Reducing the global burden: Postpartum haemorrhage. 2008. Available at: http://www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/documents/newsletter/mps_newsletter_issue4.pdf (last accessed 5 December 2008). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Khan KSW. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:1066−1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, et al. Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance − United States, 1991−1999. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ 2003;52:1−8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prendiville WJ, Elbourne D, McDonald S. Active versus expectant management in the third stage of labour. In: The Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2000; primary source Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Althabe F, Bergel E, Buekens P, et al. Controlled cord traction in the third stage of labor. Systematic review. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006;94:S126−S127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khan GQ, John IS, Wani S, et al. Controlled cord traction versus minimal intervention techniques in delivery of the placenta: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:770−774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhao S, Xiaofeng S. Clinical study on curing postpartum hemorrhage in the third stage of labor. J Pract Obstet Gynecol 2003;19:278−280. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Giacalone PL, Vignal J, Daures JP, et al. A randomised evaluation of two techniques of management of the third stage of labour in women at low risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:396−400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Betran AP, de Onis M, Lauer JA, et al. Ecological study of effect of breast feeding on infant mortality in Latin America. BMJ 2001;323:303−306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abdel-Aleem H, Hofmeyr GJ, Shokry M, et al. Uterine massage and postpartum blood loss. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006;93:238−239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cotter A, Ness A, Tolosa J. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour. In: The Cochrane Library: Issue 3, 2005. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jerbi M, Hidar S, Elmoueddeb S, et al. Oxytocin in the third stage of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2007;96:198−199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Moir DD, Amoa AB. Ergometrine or oxytocin? Blood loss and side-effects at spontaneous vertex delivery. Br J Anaesth 1979;51:113−117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zachariah ES, Naidu M, Seshadri L. Oral misoprostol in the third stage of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstetr 2006;92:23−36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.McDonald S, Abbot JM, Higgins SP. Prophylactic ergometrine�oxytocin versus oxytocin for the third stage of labour. In: The Cochrane Library: Issue 2, 2005. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Search date 2003; primary source Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gülmezoglu AM, Forna F, Villar J, Hofmeyr GJ. Prostaglandins for preventing postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD000494. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000494.pub3. Primary sources: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (February 2007) and PubMed (July 2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abdel-Aleem H, Abol-Oyoun EM, Moustafa SA, et al. Carboprost trometamol in the management of the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1993;42:247−250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Reddy R, Shenoy JV. Active management of third stage of labour. A comparative study in high risk patents for atonic postpartum haemorrhage. J Obstet Gynecol India 2001;51:44−47. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kushtagi P, Verghese LM. Evaluation of two uterotonic medications for the management of the third stage of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006;94:47−48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lamont RF, Morgan DJ, Logue M, et al. A prospective randomised trial to compare the efficacy and safety of hemabate and syntometrine for the prevention of primary postpartum haemorrhage. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2001;66:203−210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chua S, Chew SL, Yeoh CL, et al. A randomized controlled study of prostaglandin 15-methyl F2 alpha compared with syntometrine for prophylactic use in the third stage of labour. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1995;35:413−416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liabsuetrakul T, Choobun T, Peeyananjarassri K, Islam QM. Prophylactic use of ergot alkaloids in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD005456. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005456.pub2. Primary sources: The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 December 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2006, Issue 4) and MEDLINE (1966 to December 2006). 17443592 [Google Scholar]
- 23.Poeschmann RP, Doesburg WH, Eskes TK. A randomized comparison of oxytocin, sulprostone and placebo in the management of the third stage of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:528−530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van Selm M, Kanhai HH, Keirse MJ. Preventing the recurrence of atonic postpartum hemorrhage: a double-blind trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995;74:270−274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Penaranda WA, Arrieta OB, Yances BR. Active management of the childbirth sublingual misoprostol: A clinical controlled tiral in the Hospital de Materindad Rafael Calvo de Cartagena. Revista Colombiano de obstetricia ginecologia 2002;53:87−91. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vimala N, Mittal S, Kumar S. Sublingual misoprostol versus oxytocin infusion to reduce blood loss at cesarean section. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006;92:106−110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vimala N, Mittal S, Kumar S, et al. Sublingual misoprostol versus methylergometrine for active management of the third stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2004;87:1−5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Verma P, Aggarwal N, Jain V, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial to compare sublingual misoprostol with methylergometrine for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006;94:S137−S138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lam H, Tang OS, Lee CP, et al. A pilot-randomized comparison of sublingual misoprostol with syntometrine on the blood loss in the third stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:647−650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hoj L, Cardoso P, Nielsen BB, et al. Effect of sublingual misoprostol on severe postpartum haemorrhage in a primary health centre in Guinea-bissau: a randomised double blind clinical trial. BMJ 2005;331:723−727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Lapaire O, Schneider MC, Stotz M, et al. Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin in reducing blood loss after emergency cesarean delivery. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2006;95:2−7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ng PS, Lai CY, Sahota DS, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of oral misoprostol and intramuscular syntometrine in the management of the third stage of labor. Gynecologic Obstet Invest 2007;63:55−60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ozkaya O, Sezik M, Kaya H, et al. Placebo-controlled randomized comparison of vaginal with rectal misoprostol in the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2005:31;389−393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
