Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2010 Jul 7;132(26):8882–8884. doi: 10.1021/ja101317g

Precise mapping of RNA Tertiary Structure via Nanometer Distance Measurements with Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) Spectroscopy

Nak-Kyoon Kim 1,†,§, Michael K Bowman 1,, Victoria J DeRose 1,*,†,||
PMCID: PMC2908488  NIHMSID: NIHMS215074  PMID: 20557039

Abstract

Divalent metal (Mg2+) ion-dependent folding of the hammerhead ribozyme from S. mansoni was monitored with double electron-electron resonance (DEER) pulsed EPR spectroscopy by measuring nanometer-scale distances between paramagnetic spin-labels attached to the RNA. DEER measurements detect global folding of the ribozyme with excellent agreement between predictions from experimental, modeled, and crystallographic measurements. These measurements demonstrate the use of DEER spectroscopy as a tool for structural analysis of complex RNAs.


Many functional RNA molecules fold into specific tertiary structures and may undergo dynamic structural changes that are critical to their function. Adding to static structural information available from X-ray crystallography, advances in biophysical methods using NMR, FRET, and EPR spectroscopies have facilitated determination and prediction of RNA structure and folding.1 While a powerful tool for solution structures and dynamics, macromolecular NMR is challenging for large RNA molecules due to significant spectral overlap and fast signal decay.2 FRET lacks such biomolecule size limitations and has been used to measure inter-label distances up to 8 nm and to monitor dynamics of biomolecules in single-molecule experiments.3 As an alternative to FRET that offers very high precision, Double Electron-Electron Resonance spectroscopy (DEER) is becoming a popular method for measuring distances between 1.5 – 8 nm as reported by the weak dipolar interaction between radicals.4 Recently, this method has been applied to functionally important, spin-labeled proteins and naturally-occurring radicals.5,6 DEER measurements have also been reported for nucleic acids, principally for relatively rigid RNA hairpin and RNA or DNA duplexes.7

In response to environmental factors such as ionic strength, or to the presence of proteins or small molecules, RNA can undergo complex folding transitions that are mediated by tertiary interactions. In this study, we use DEER distance measurements with site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) to study one such folding event in a metal-induced ribozyme structural change. This work provides an important demonstration of DEER spectroscopy applied to global folding transitions in complex RNA molecules.

The hammerhead ribozyme (HHRz) is a small self-cleaving RNA motif.8 The HHRz has three flanking helices around a conserved active-site core, and folds into a catalytic Y-shaped conformation in the presence of metal ions.9 Recent studies have shown that intramolecular loop-loop interactions in native, ‘extended’ HHRzs have a long-range influence on the core, promoting catalytically active conformations and supporting 50- to 500-fold faster cleavage rates than those reported for truncated HHRzs.914 The crystal structure of the S. mansoni HHRz obtained in high ionic strength (Figure 1) shows close interactions between Loops I and II.11a In solution, global folding of this HHRz has been shown to occur in low Mg2+ concentrations,12,13 but accompanying kinetic measurements find the fastest cleavage rates at even higher Mg2+ ion concentrations.12,14 One potential reason for increasing HHRz activity would be further Mg2+-dependent rearrangements in the ribozyme core.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Hammerhead ribozyme (HHRz) structure. (a) Secondary structure of the extended HHRz from S. mansoni. The enzyme sequence is written in black, substrate in blue, spin labeling sites in red, and the conserved nucleotides in bold letters. Ribozyme cleavage site is marked as a red arrow, and the base pairing in loop I is indicated with a dashed line. The U-loop substitutions are indicated. (b) Model of spin-labeled extended HHRz created from the crystal structure (PDB Entry: 2GOZ (ref. 11a)). Substrate is shown in blue and the enzyme is in magenta. The spin labels are shown in green with dashed circles.

Here, we investigate Mg2+-ion induced folding of the extended HHRz from S. mansoni by measuring distances between nitroxide spin labels incorporated into stems I and II, and compare these with ribozyme activity in order to investigate how inter-stem interactions and tertiary folding are linked to ribozyme catalysis. Two 4-isocyanato TEMPO spin labels15 were introduced to 2′-amino substituted U1.6 and CL2.1 positions in loops I and II of the extended HHRz respectively (Figure 1a), and ribozyme folding was monitored based on changes in spin-spin distance populations with addition of Mg2+ ions. An advantage of studying RNA folding transitions in the HHRz by DEER is that ribozyme activity provides a sensitive assay for functional perturbations by the attached labels. Previously we showed that nitroxide labeling at the 2′-position of U1.6 has little effect on HHRz cleavage rates.12 Here the activities of ribozymes spin-labeled at both U1.6 and CL2.1 are found to be nearly identical to those of unlabeled ribozymes (Figure S2, Table S1), indicating that labeling at these two positions does not perturb folding to the active structure. As a control RNA a loop II ‘U-loop’ substituted ribozyme12,14 was used, in which the loss of the loop-loop tertiary interaction strongly decreases activity. For distance measurements the substrates were protected from cleavage with 2′-OMe modification at C17. Four-pulse DEER traces of frozen-solution samples were obtained, and the data fit using Tikhanov regularization.7e

Figure 2 and Figure S4 show distance distribution functions for the spin-labeled wild type (*[U1.6,CL2.1]) and U-loop substituted (*[U1.6,UL2.1]) HHRzs in increasing Mg2+ concentrations. Samples containing just a single spin label at U1.6 have only background inter-molecular dipolar couplings7e which are then removed in the fitting to reveal only a weak distance distribution (Figure 2, dashed line). This intramolecular distribution fluctuates around zero as a result of noise and imperfections in the theoretical background correction (Supporting Information).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Overlaid distance distribution functions for spin-labeled extended HHRz in various Mg2+ concentrations and 0.1 M NaCl, pH 7.0. Distribution of inter-spin distances for (a) wild type and (b) U-loop substituted ribozyme in Mg2+ concentrations of 0 mM (black), 1 mM (red), 10 mM (blue), 25 mM (green), and 50 mM (gold). The black dashed line is for the isolated spin labeled substrate in 1 mM Mg2+ and 0.1M NaCl.

In contrast, the double spin-labeled wild type HHRz shows a strong metal-dependent increase in the distance distribution at 2–3 nm (Figure 2a). In the absence of Mg2+ ions (Figure 2a, black solid line) the distribution between spin labels in the wild type ribozyme is broad, uniform and greater than zero with fluctuations comparable to the single-labeled control (dashed line), suggesting that in low ionic strength the two stems of the HHRz are randomly oriented. Random stem orientation in low ionic strength has also been predicted from FRET studies.13b However, in the labeled WT HHRz with 1 mM Mg2+ a small peak appears above the fluctuations and becomes quite prominent at ~2.4 nm upon addition of up to 50 mM Mg2+. These data show the Mg2+-dependent emergence of a HHRz population with short and defined inter-nitroxide distances.

A simple model for the nitroxide spin-labeled extended HHRz was constructed from a crystal structure (PDB: 2GOZ, Figure 3 and Supplemental Information) that is assumed to reflect a globally folded form of the RNA. This model predicts an inter-spin distance of ~ 2.5 nm between U1.6 and CL2.1 only for rotamers in which the spin-label motion is restricted by each minor groove. Localization of the 2′-urea linked spin label at U1.6 was also observed in our previous dynamics experiments, which showed immobilization of a single label attached to U1.6 upon docking of stems I and II with increasing Mg2+ concentrations.12 Lineshape analysis of those single-label spectra were used to predict Mg2+-dependence of RNA folding, but could not provide the long-range structural information that is available from these DEER measurements. The agreement between the DEER- and molecular modeling-derived distances of 2.5 and 2.4 Å, respectively, is excellent.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Models of nitroxide label positions based on molecular modeling with HHRz crystal structure (PDB ID:2GOZ, Supporting Information). HHRz enzyme strand is in magenta and substrate strand in blue. Spin labeling sites 1.6 and L2.1 are shown. (a) A view from the top of Stems I and II shows the relative positions of the two labels (green). Close-up views of the label positions in Stem II (b) and Stem I (c) depict minor-groove localization that gives excellent agreement between interspin distances predicted from modeling and DEER experiments.

As expected, DEER spectra of the U-loop substituted HHRz show that the broad distance distributions between labels at U1.6 and UL2.1 do not change much with up to 10 mM [Mg2+] (Figure 2b). This is consistent with the very low activity observed for the U-loop HHRz, and an increase in ionic requirement for folding upon loss of stabilizing tertiary interactions that has been previously measured by FRET.13b The U-loop substituted HHRz data provide an important control showing that the interspin population increase at ~ 2.5 nm observed in the native HHRz is indeed monitoring increased amounts of the active HHRz structure.

If it is assumed that the increase in short distance population with higher [Mg2+] reflects an increase in docked HHRz conformation, the half-maximum [Mg2+] for complete docking between stems I and II can be roughly estimated to be K1/2 ~ 8 mM (0.1 M Na+, Supporting information Figure S3). Global folding of the S. mansoni extended HHRz in 0.1 M NaCl has been previously measured by spin label dynamics and FRET to occur with a K1/2 ~ 1 mM Mg2+.12,13b The slightly larger Mg2+ requirement for folding exhibited in these DEER measurements could be due to differences in experimental conditions, including the use of cryoprotectant (ethylene glycol) and any shift in equilibrium constant as the DEER sample cooled to the freezing point.

The DEER measurements described here provide precise interlabel distances and can be considered complementary to measurements obtained by FRET for RNA structure studies. Solution-based FRET measurements can measure structural fluctuations,3 whereas DEER requires low temperatures and may reflect a distribution of populations. As has been noted,16 the smaller size of nitroxide labels in comparison with many fluorophores has potential for less perturbation and may allow label placement closer to functionally sensitive regions. Distance determination by this method is robust over a broad range without changing label type, and is free of the problems associated with the relative orientation of transition dipoles in FRET because the localized magnetic transition dipoles are oriented by the magnetic field, and not by the molecular structure. The spectral position of a line in EPR is affected by molecular orientation, however, and so it is possible to use non-selective pulses as here, minimizing effects of label orientation, or conversely to exploit selective pulse schemes to gain additional information with highly oriented radicals.6c

In summary, the Mg2+- dependent folding of the S. mansoni extended HHRz ribozyme has been monitored via observation of nanometer-scale distances between spin labels at U1.6 and CL2.1 in the two loops I and II using SDSL and DEER spectroscopy. A distinct change due to an increase in the population of ribozymes with a short inter-label distance is observed with increasing [Mg2+]. The measured distance is remarkably consistent with models generated from static crystal structures when it is assumed that the spin labels preferentially localize near to the RNA minor grooves. The DEER technique described here can be applied to predict folding of other functional RNA molecules, including in complex RNA-protein complexes.

Supplementary Material

1_si_001

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the NIH (GM058096 to VJD, GM061904 to MKB). Pulsed EPR spectroscopy was performed at EMSL, a national scientific user facility sponsored by the DOE’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research and located at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available: Materials, methods, kinetic data, raw DEER data, and additional references. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.(a) Al-Hashimi HM, Walter NG. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2008;18:321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Joo C, Balci H, Ishitsuka Y, Buranachai C, Ha T. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:51–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.070606.101543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sowa GZ, Qin PZ. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 2008;82:147–97. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6603(08)00005-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.(a) Wu B, Girard F, van Buuren B, Schleucher J, Tessari M, Wijmenga S. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:3228–3239. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tzakos AG, Grace CRR, Lukavsky PJ, Riek R. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2006;35:391–342. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.35.040405.102034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ditzler MA, Aleman EA, Rueda D, Walter NG. Biopolymers. 2007;87:302–316. doi: 10.1002/bip.20819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.(a) Jeschke G, Polyhach Y. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2007;9:1895–1910. doi: 10.1039/b614920k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Schiemann O, Prisner TF. Q Rev Biophys. 2007;40:1–53. doi: 10.1017/S003358350700460X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.(a) Altenbach C, Kusnetzow AK, Ernst OP, Hofmann KP, Hubbell WL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:7439–7444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802515105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ding F, Layten M, Simmerling C. J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:7184–7185. doi: 10.1021/ja800893d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hagelueken G, Ingledew WJ, Huang H, Petrovic-Stojanovska B, Whitfield C, ElMkami H, Schiemann O, Naismith JH. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48:2904–2906. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.(a) Denysenkov VP, Biglino D, Lubitz W, Prisner TF, Bennati M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2008;47:1224–1227. doi: 10.1002/anie.200703753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Hara H, Kawamori A, Astashkin AV, Ono T. Biochim Biophys Acta, Bioenerg. 1996;1276:140–146. [Google Scholar]; (c) Schiemann O, Cekan P, Margraf D, Prisner TF, Sigurdsson ST. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2009;48:3292–3295. doi: 10.1002/anie.200805152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.(a) Krstic I, Frolow O, Sezer D, Endeward B, Weigand JE, Suess B, Engels JW, Prisner TF. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:1454–1455. doi: 10.1021/ja9077914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Cai Q, Kusnetzow AK, Hideg K, Price EA, Haworth IS, Qin PZ. Biophys J. 2007;93:2110–2117. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.107.109439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Schiemann O, Piton N, Mu Y, Stock G, Engels JW, Prisner TF. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:5722–5729. doi: 10.1021/ja0393877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Sicoli G, Mathis G, Aci-Seche S, Saint-Pierre C, Boulard Y, Gasparutto D, Gambarelli S. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:3165–3176. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Bowman MK, Maryasov AG, Kim N, DeRose VJ. Appl Magn Reson. 2004;26:23–39. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Forster AC, Symons RH. Cell. 1987;49:211–20. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90562-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Blount KF, Uhlenbeck OC. Ann Rev Biophys and Biomol Struct. 2005;34:415–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.34.122004.184428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.(a) Khvorova A, Lescoute A, Westhof E, Jayasena SD. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10:708–712. doi: 10.1038/nsb959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nelson JA, Uhlenbeck OC. Mol Cell. 2006;23:447–450. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.(a) Martick M, Scott WG. Cell. 2006;126:309–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Nelson JA, Uhlenbeck OC. RNA. 2008;14:605–615. doi: 10.1261/rna.912608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kim NK, Murali A, DeRose VJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:14134–14135. doi: 10.1021/ja0541027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.(a) Penedo JC, Wilson TJ, Jayasena SD, Khvorova A, Lilley DM. RNA. 2004;10:880–888. doi: 10.1261/rna.5268404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Boots JL, Canny MD, Azimi E, Pardi A. RNA. 2008;14:2212–2122. doi: 10.1261/rna.1010808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Canny MD, Jucker FM, Kellogg E, Khvorova A, Jayasena SD, Pardi A. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:10848–10849. doi: 10.1021/ja046848v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.(a) Edwards TE, Okonogi TM, Robinson BH, Sigurdsson ST. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123:1527–1528. doi: 10.1021/ja005649i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Edwards TE, Sigurdsson ST. Nat Protocols. 2007;2:1954–1962. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.(a) Cekan P, Jonsson EO, Sigurdsson ST. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:3990–3995. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Grant GP, Boyd N, Herschlag D, Qin PZ. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131:3136–3137. doi: 10.1021/ja808217s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1_si_001

RESOURCES