Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2011 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2010 Jul 14;18(7):759–760. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.06.002

Mg2+ Channel Selectivity probed by EPR

Yeon-Kyun Shin 1,2
PMCID: PMC2910259  NIHMSID: NIHMS221758  PMID: 20637411

Summary

The functionally important extracellular loop is not resolved in crystal structures of a putative bacterial Mg2+ channel CorA. In this issue, Dalmas et al. use EPR to determine a structural model for this conserved loop, providing new insight into the ion selectivity.


With concentrations as high as 25 mM, magnesium (Mg2+) is the most abundant divalent cation in cells. Chemically, Mg2+ prefers the hexa-coordination and forms complexes with octahedral geometry. Moreover, its preponderance of oxygen as its ligand offers unique chemical and structural platforms that are utilized in structure-function biology: Mg2+ is woven into many enzymatic reactions in nearly all metabolic pathways. In particular, it acts as a cofactor for every reaction that generates energy from ATP hydrolysis. Also, Mg2+ is alloyed into various biological structures such as chlorophyll, RNA/DNA, and proteins and stabilizes their biologically active forms.

Although small fluctuations of Mg2+ concentration in the cell may be tolerated, a balance of Mg2+ within a certain range is vital for healthy cellular functions. Lipid membranes are impermeable to divalent cations. Therefore, cell membranes require transmembrane channels or transporters that allow Mg2+ to pass through in a controlled fashion. Up to now, many Mg2+ channels/transporters have been identified and crystal structures of some of them have been solved (Moomaw and Maguire, 2008).

The CorA protein, widespread in bacterial species, is a putative bacterial Mg2+ channel. It is a homopentamer and the overall fold of two CorA monomers within the pentameric structure is schematically shown in Figure 1. The structure can be divided into three sections: extracellular loops, the pore, and the cytoplasmic funnel. The funnel, fenced primarily by stalk helices, is quite unique and not seen in any other protein structures. When new channel structures were determined (Eshaghi et al., 2006; Lunin et al., 2006; Payandeh and Pai, 2006) the anticipation was to get an answer for the first and foremost question about the channel: How does this protein selectively transport Mg2+ among others ions? For CorA the selective filter may be located in the extracellular loop region because mutations in this conserved loop result in important functional effects. Unfortunately, this region is not resolved in the crystal structure. Thus, the mechanism of the ion selection still remains unknown.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A structural model for Thermotoga maritima CorA in the membrane. Two monomers in the homopentameric arrangement are shown.

In a paper published in this issue of Structure Perozo and coworkers (Dalmas et al., 2010) present the first glimpse of the putative Mg2+ selectivity filter in CorA. The authors used a highly innovative method combining electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and theory to develop a structural model of the putative selectivity filter.

Perozo and coworkers use site-directed spin labeling (SDSL)(Altenbach et al., 1990) in which native residues are replaced one by one with cysteines and the nitroxide probe is attached to thus engineered cysteine residue. Accessibility of a water soluble paramagnetic species Ni(II)-EDDA to the nitroxide is measured with an EPR relaxation method for each position in the loop. In parallel, an initial structural model was derived from the Rosetta ab initio modeling. Finally, the structure is refined to fit the Ni(II)-EDDA accessibility data. Additionally, the authors find that the nitroxides attached at position 316 show strong spin-spin coupling (Rabenstein and Shin, 1995), indicating that residue 316 may project towards the center of the pentameric ring. Putting together the structure shows a negatively charged nest in which a hydrated Mg2+ ion can sit nicely. Perhaps, the nest is designed to accept only hydrated Mg2+, and discriminate against other divalent cations with different water coordination. Additionally, the electron negativity would aid the selection of divalent cations versus monovalent ones by concentrating the former near the nest. Further, the backbone and side chains are expected to be dynamic. Therefore, the structural plasticity and the induced fit upon binding might also play a role in discerning Mg2+ from other ions.

In K+ channels, the permeant ion enters the selectivity filter in a naked form after shedding the bound water molecules. In the filter the bare ion is stabilized by the tight interactions with carbonyls from the surrounding amino acids (Doyle et al., 1998). However, for Mg2+, the mechanism of ion selection may be entirely different. Energetically, dehydration of divalent cations is 5-6 times more difficult than that of monovalent cations. For Mg2+, a hexa-coordination on all vertices of an octahedron by protein oxygens in replacement of water molecules is geometrically difficult to satisfy in the selectivity filter, although partial replacement of water molecules is a possibility. Therefore, it is most likely that divalent cations enter into the selectivity filter as fully or partially hydrated forms and pass through the pore as hydrated. Therefore, selection of Mg2+ ion by the negatively charged nest could be entirely different from the case with K+ and the structural model of the selective filter of CorA presented here by Perozo and coworkers may have general implications for many channels/transporters for divalent cations.

The available CorA crystal structure determined in a detergent shows the pore is too narrow to allow hydrated Mg2+ to enter and pass. This ‘closed’ conformation is validated by the Perozo’s extensive EPR work in the lipid membrane, which paves the way to study the expected conformational changes with channel opening using EPR.

In the Perozo’s paper the authors used an innovative EPR method to determine the structure of the crystallographically unresolved extracellular loop of CorA, shedding a new light on the ion selectivity for divalent cations. Crystal structures often miss functionally important structural motifs. Thus, this new complementary EPR approach to crystallography may have the wide applicability in structure-functional studies of membrane proteins.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NIH grant # R01 GM51290 and by the grant from the World Class University program in Korea.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  1. Altenbach C, Marti T, Khorana HG, Hubbell WL. Transmembrane protein structure: spin labeling of bacteriorhodopsin mutants. Science. 1990;248:1088–1092. doi: 10.1126/science.2160734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dalmas O, Cuello LG, Jogini V, Cortes DM, Roux B, Perozo E. Structural Dynamics of the Magnesium-bound Conformation of CorA in a lipid bilayer. Structure. 2010:18. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2010.04.009. *bxs. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doyle DA, Morais Cabral J, Pfuetzner RA, Kuo A, Gulbis JM, Cohen SL, Chait BT, MacKinnon R. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science. 1998;280:69–77. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5360.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Eshaghi S, Niegowski D, Kohl A, Martinez Molina D, Lesley SA, Nordlund P. Crystal structure of a divalent metal ion transporter CorA at 2.9 angstrom resolution. Science. 2006;313:354–357. doi: 10.1126/science.1127121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lunin VV, Dobrovetsky E, Khutoreskaya G, Zhang R, Joachimiak A, Doyle DA, Bochkarev A, Maguire ME, Edwards AM, Koth CM. Crystal structure of the CorA Mg2+ transporter. Nature. 2006;440:833–837. doi: 10.1038/nature04642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Moomaw AS, Maguire ME. The unique nature of mg2+ channels. Physiology (Bethesda) 2008;23:275–285. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00019.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Payandeh J, Pai EF. A structural basis for Mg2+ homeostasis and the CorA translocation cycle. EMBO J. 2006;25:3762–3773. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rabenstein MD, Shin YK. Determination of the distance between two spin labels attached to a macromolecule. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:8239–8243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES