Skip to main content
PPAR Research logoLink to PPAR Research
. 2010 Jul 5;2010:601562. doi: 10.1155/2010/601562

Effects of Endogenous PPAR Agonist Nitro-Oleic Acid on Metabolic Syndrome in Obese Zucker Rats

Haiping Wang 1, 2,2, Haiying Liu 1, Zhanjun Jia 1, Guangju Guan 2, Tianxin Yang 1,*
PMCID: PMC2910468  PMID: 20671947

Abstract

Nitroalkene derivatives of nitro-oleic acid (OA-NO2) are endogenous lipid products with novel signaling properties, particularly the activation of PPARs. The goal of this proposal was to examine the therapeutic potential of this OA-NO2 in treatment of obesity and obesity-related conditions in obese Zucker rats. The animals were randomly divided to receive OA-NO2, oleic acid (OA), both at 7.5 μg/kg/d, or vehicle ethanol via osmotic mini-pumps for 2 weeks. Following OA-NO2 treatment, food intake was decreased as early as the first day and this effect appeared to persist throughout the experimental period. At day 14, body weight gain was significantly reduced by OA-NO2 treatment. This treatment significantly reduced plasma triglyceride and almost normalized plasma free fatty acid and significantly increased plasma high-density lipid (HDL). The plasma TBARS and proteinuria were paralelly decreased. In contrast, none of these parameters were affected by OA treatment. After 14 days of OA-NO2 treatment, hematocrit, a surrogate of fluid retention associated with PPARγ agonists, remained unchanged. Together, these data demonstrated that OA-NO2 may offer an effective and safe therapeutic intervention for obesity and obesity-related conditions.

1. Introduction

The prevalence of overweight and obesity has dramatically increased during the past two decades. According to results of recent National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 66.3% of adults in the United States are overweight or obese defined as a body mass index (BMI) of 25 or greater. Of these, 32.2% are obese defined as a BMI of 30 or greater [1]. The World Health Organization has estimated that worldwide, over one billion adults are overweight, with at least 300 million of them being obese [2]. Obesity is associated with a variety of chronic diseases, including endocrine disorders including metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and dislipidemia; cardiovascular disease including hypertension, congestive cardiomyopathy, stroke, and coronary heart disease; respiratory disorders including dyspnea and obstructive sleep apnea; depression, sleep disorders, musculoskeletal disorders, and gallbladder disease. Life style modification including exercise and calorie restriction remains the cornerstone of anti-obesity therapy but the long term success rate is low. In recent years, pharmacotherapy of obesity has received much attention.

Recently, nitrated free fatty acids (NO2-FA), notably nitroalkene derivatives of linoleic acid (nitrolinoleic acid, LNO2) and oleic acid (OA-NO2) are found to be endogenous molecules with several attractive signaling properties [3, 4]. In particular, nitroalkenes are found to be a robust endogenous ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) and they also activate PPARα and PPARδ at increasing concentrations [3, 4]. PPARs have emerged as a novel therapeutic target for treatment of various components of metabolic syndrome. For example, synthetic PPARγ agonists, thiazolidinediones, have been widely used as insulin sensitizing agents for treatment of type 2 diabetes; synthetic PPARα agonists such as clofibrate and fenofibrate have been used in clinics for more than 30 years as lipid lowering agents [58]. Unfortunately, these synthetic agents are often associated with various toxicities [7, 911]. The goal of the present study was to examine the therapeutic potential of OA-NO2 in an experimental model of obesity and metabolic syndrome.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Four month-old male obese Zucker and lean rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratory (Wilmington, MA). All animals were housed at the University of Utah Comparative Medicine Center, maintained on a 12-hour light/dark cycle, and provided food and water ad libitum. Procedures and protocols followed guidelines set by the Laboratory Animal Care Committee at the University of Utah.

2.2. Materials

9-Nitrooleic acid and 10-nitrooleic acid are two regioisomers of nitrooleic acid (OA-NO2). These regioisomers are formed by nitration of oleic acid in approximately equal proportions as described elsewhere [4]. The two compounds were purchased from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI) (9-nitrooleic acid: Cat#10008042; 10-nitrooleic acid: Cat#10008043) and used as a 1:1 mixture of the isomers.

2.3. Protocols for Animal Experiments

Under general anesthesia, obese Zucker rats were subcutaneously implanted with a mini-pump (DURECT Corporation, Cupertino, CA) delivering OA-NO2, oleic acid (OA), both at 7.5 μg/kg/d, or vehicle ethanol for 2 weeks. Age and gender matched lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Food intake was determined periodically; body weight and collections of blood and 24-h urine samples were determined at the end of the experiments. Animals were fasted from 6:00 pm to 9:00 am before blood sampling. Blood sampling was conducted by making a small cut (~2 mm) in the tail using razor blade. 24-hour urine was collected using metabolic cages.

2.4. Plasma Glucose and Lipids

The following determinations were analyzed by using ROCHE, Modular P in the University Hospital Chemistry Laboratory: glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL, and LDL; non-esterided fatty acids were determined by using a colorimetric method (Cat# SFA-5, ZenBio, Research Triangle Park, NC).

2.5. Hematocrit

Hematocrit was determined as the popular ways. Briefly, 5–10 μl of blood was collected from tail cut using a 10 μl capillary glass (Idaho Technology). One side of the tube was sealed with Hemato-Seal and then centrifuged for 4 minutes in a Thermo IEC microcentrifuge machine. The total height of sample and height of the red blood cell column were measured. The hematocrit reflects the ratio between the red blood cell column and total height.

2.6. Measurement of Thiobarbituric Acid-Reactive Substances (TBARS)

The measurement of TBARS was based on the formation of malondialdehyde (MDA) by using a commercially available TBARS Assay kit (Cat#: 10009055, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI).

2.7. Total Urine Protein

24-h urinary protein excretion was measured by using Commassie blue.

2.8. Statistical Analyses

All data are presented as means ± SEM. Differences between groups were analyzed by unpaired t test or 2-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni post hoc test using GraphPad Prism software version 3.03 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Differences within groups, before and after OA-NO2 treatment, were analyzed by paired t test. A probability value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of OA-NO2 on Food Intake and Body Weight Gain

Starting from 4 months of age, the obese Zucker rats were chronically infused for 2 weeks with vehicle, OA-NO2 or OA each at 7.5 μg/kg/day via an osmotic mini-pump. Untreated age-matched lean rats were used as controls. As shown in Figure 1, OA-NO2 treatment in obese Zucker rats reduced food intake as early as day 1 (Vehicle 36.6 ± 1.01 versus OA-NO2 31.2 ± 1.04 g, P < .01), and this effect appeared to persist throughout the experiment except that only a trend was detected on day 14. Over the 14-day period, obese Zucker rats exhibited a significant increase in body weight as compared with lean controls (obese Zucker 48.0 ± 4.0 versus lean 16.7 ± 1.2 g, P < .01). The body weight gain in obese Zucker rats was reduced to 34.0 ± 1.1 g by OA-NO2 treatment (P < .05). In contrast, a 14-day treatment with OA in obese Zucker rats at the same dose and same infusion rate did not affect food intake or body weight.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Food intake in male 4-mo-old obese Zucker rats (obese) over 14 days of infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA, each at 7.5 μg/kg/d via osmotic mini-pumps. Age and gender matched lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. *, P < .01 versus Obese/Vehicle; #, P < .05 versus OA during the corresponding period. Data are mean ± SE.

3.2. Effect of OA-NO2 on Biochemical Parameters

At baseline, obese Zucker rats already developed significant hypertriglyceridemia as compared with lean controls (549.1 ± 63.4 versus 78.0 ± 11.2 mg/dl, P < .01) and the values continued to rise on day 14. The baseline values of plasma triglyceride in the OA-NO2 and OA groups (OA-NO2: 556.8 ± 45.8 mg/dl; OA: 637.0 ± 102.0 mg/dl) were comparable to the vehicle group. At day 14, the values in OA-NO2 group (423.0 ± 46.0 mg/dl) but not OA group (687.0 ± 99.0 mg/dl) was significantly lower than the vehicle control (877.4 ± 64.9 mg/dl). Plasma non-esteried free fatty acids followed a similar pattern as plasma triglyceride. Of particular note, a 14-day treatment with OA-NO2 but not OA decreased plasma non-esteried free fatty acid concentrations to a value almost comparable to the lean control. In contrast, plasma cholesterol was unaffected by OA-NO2 or OA. Interestingly, a 14-day OA-NO2 treatment elevated plasma HDL from 26.8 ± 1.49 to 32.6 ± 2.6 mg/dl (P < .05), paralleled by the increased HDL to total cholesterol ratio. In contrast, both plasma HDL and the HDL to cholesterol ratio remained unchanged after 14-day treatment with vehicle and OA. At day 14, obese Zucker rats exhibited normal glycemia (93.7 ± 6.9 versus mg/dl) that was not affected by OA-NO2 treatment (85.6 ± 5.3 mg/dl, P > .05). Plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and BUN were evaluated to reflect liver and kidney function, respectively; none of these parameters were affected by OA-NO2 treatment (AST: 156.8 ± 18.4 versus 159 ± 7.7 U/L, P > .05; ALT: 135.0 ± 18.9 versus 104.5 ± 3.9 U/L, P > .05; BUN: 15.0 ± 1.1 versus 15.8 ± 0.7 mg/dl, n = 4-5, P > .05). Therefore, these data do not indicate obvious hepatic or renal toxicities associated with OA-NO2.

3.3. Effects of OA-NO2 on Oxidative Stress, Proteinuria, and Hematocrit

Plasma TBARS was assessed as a measure of oxidative stress in obese Zucker rats. The obese rats had a marked increase in plasma TBARS as compared with lean controls (14.83 ± 1.47 versus 1.97 ± 0.63 μM, P < .01). A 14-day OA-NO2 treatment decreased plasma TBARS levels to 8.26 ± 2.31 μM (P < .01 versus the baseline in the same group or the vehicle group at the corresponding time period). As compared with the lean control (12.22 ± 0.73 mg/24 hours), obese Zucker rats exhibited progressive proteinuria (day 0: 34.88 ± 8.17; day 14: 78.5 ± 19.7 mg/24 hours). OA treatment tended to exhibit an anti-proteuric effect but this did not reach a statistical significance.

PPARγ agonists are limited by significant fluid retention as reflected by body weight gain and plasma volume expansion. The drop of hematocrit has been used as a surrogate marker of plasma volume expansion since these compounds do not influence erythropoiesis. Therefore we examined hematocrit in awake animals; hematocrit remained unchanged irrespective of OA-NO2 or OA treatment.

4. Discussion

linoleic acid (nitrolinoleic acid, LNO2) and oleic acid (OA-NO2) are two major nitroalkene derivatives formed endogenously via NO-dependent oxidative reactions [12, 13]. Studies in cell cultures have demonstrated PPAR ligand activities of these derivatives [3, 4]. In this regard, LNO2 was initially reported to be a potent an endogenous ligand for PPARγ that acts within physiological concentration ranges [3]. Subsequently, OA-NO2 was shown to be a more robust PPARγ activator as compared with LNO2 and it also activated PPARα and PPARδ at increasing concentrations [3, 4]. The three subtypes of PPARs are critically important for the control of glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism. Therefore we were prompted to evaluate the therapeutic potential of nitroalkene derivatives in an animal model of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Here we demonstrate that a 14-day osmotic delivery of a low dose (7.5 μg/kg/d) of OA-NO2 in obese Zucker rats produced beneficial effects on various components of metabolic syndrome, including obesity, hyperlipidemia, and proteinuria, accompanied by an immediate reduction of food intake.

Epidemiological studies demonstrate that ingestion of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) but ingestion of saturated fatty acid deteriorates insulin resistance and obesity-related diseases [14]. An issue arises as to whether the beneficial effects of OA-NO2 observed in obese Zucker rats are attributable to the native OA. This possibility is not supported by a previous study showing that chronic administration of dietary oleic acid in obese Zucker at a dose roughly 500 times higher than that in the present study fails to affect body weight, plasma glucose and lipids despite the amelioration of pancreatic islet disruption [15]. Along this line, the benefits of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC omega-3 PUFA) are also seen with a substantially high dose [16]. More importantly, we found that administration of OA at the same dose and with the same route did not produce any measurable effects on body weight or other metabolic parameters. It appears evident that the beneficial effects of OA-NO2 observed in obese Zucker rats are derived from the nitration of OA but not the native fatty acid.

The mechanism of action of OA-NO2 in obese Zucker rats remains elusive but the involvement of PPARs appears conceivable. PPARα agonists (Wy-14643 and GW7647) and endogenous PPARα agonists (oleylethanolamide;OEA) treatment induces satiety and reduces body weight gain [1720], an effect almost analogous to that of OA-NO2 in obese Zucker rats. The rapid onset of appetite-suppressing effect (within a day) between PPARα agonists and OA-NO2 is also similar. Furthermore, PPARα agonists are well known to reduce plasma triglyceride and increase HDL, a profile again similar to that of OA-NO2. Together, PPARα activity appears to explain most of metabolic effects of OA-NO2 in obese Zucker rats. Of note, both OEA and OA-NO2 are naturally occurring products derived from the same precursor, OA, and exert a similar role in regulation of satiety and body weight. It is an intriguing possibility that the two derivatives of OA converge on a common final pathway involving PPARα. However, the differences may exist in regulation of their production. OEA is produced by the small intestine in response to food intake [17, 20] while the production of OA-NO2 appears to be primarily regulated by NO-dependent oxidative reactions which may or may not be related to feeding.

Although OA-NO2 is a robust PPARγ activator in an in vitro system, the involvement of PPARγ in OA-NO2 signaling in the current experimental model might be minimal. In a sharp contrast to the appetite-suppressing and weight-lowering effects of OA-NO2, the synthetic PPARγ agonists, thiazolidinediones, cause increases in food intake [21, 22] and body weight and plasma volume expansion [10, 23, 24]. The lack of an effect of the PPARδ/β agonist on food intake [17] also does not support involvement of PPARδ in the anorectic action of OA-NO2. However, it is still possible that these two PPAR subtypes may partially contribute to some aspects of OA-NO2 action, such as the lipid-lowering and proteinuria-lowering effects. Indeed, all three PPAR subtypes share common lipid-lowering properties [2528], and PPARα [2932] and PPARγ [3336] exert similar renoprotective effects in animals or humans with diabetic nephropathy. It should be pointed out that in addition to PPARs, nitrated lipids can engage other pathways such as NO, NF-kB, and hemoxygnease-1. Whether these PPAR-independent or other as yet unidentified pathways play a contributory role in mediating the metabolic actions of OA-NO2 remains unclear.

Whatever the underlying mechanism, our data suggest that OA-NO2 may offer therapeutic opportunities for management of obesity and obesity-related conditions. At the present, most of the anti-obesity agents target neurotransmitter receptors and are often associated with increased risk of psychiatric events. One example is rimonabant, a selective antagonist of the cannabinoid type 1 receptor, which is the most officious weight-lowering agent but causes depression and anxiety [3739]. Because of the psychiatric side effects, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) has recommended suspension of rimonabant as an anti-obesity therapy [40]. OA-NO2 is unique in that it is a naturally occurring product likely acting nuclear receptors, thus representing a novel class of weight-lowering agents. We demonstrated that it is not only highly effective but also well tolerated. Moreover, OA-NO2 exhibited beneficial effects beyond weight loss. For example, it improved lipid profile, suppressed oxidative stress, and reduced proteinuria.

In summary, the present study describes novel therapeutic potential of OA-NO2 in a rodent model of obesity and metabolic syndrome. A low-dose treatment produces anorexia and reduces body weight gain, accompanied by improved lipid profile, and reduction of oxidative stress and proteinuria, in the absence of plasma volume expansion. These effects are derived from the nitration of OA rather than the native fatty acid. As a natural product, OA-NO2 appears to be an optimal pharmacotherapy for obesity and obesity-related conditions with a superior efficacy and safety profile.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Body weight gain in obese Zucker rats before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Plasma triglyceride in obese Zucker rats before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Plasma cholesterol in obese Zucker rats before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Plasma HDL (a) and the ratio of HDL to total cholesterol (b) before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Plasma non-esteried fatty acids in obese Zucker rats before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Plasma TBARS in obese Zucker rats before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Proteinuria in obese Zucker rats before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Hematocrit in obese Zucker rats before and after 14-d infusion with vehicle, OA-NO2, or OA. Lean rats with vehicle treatment were used as controls. Lean: n = 3; Vehicle: n = 7; OA-NO2: n = 5; OA: n = 5. Data are mean ± SE.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Technology Commercialization Project (TCP) program from University of Utah and NIH grant DK079162. T.Y. is an Established Investigator from American Heart Association.

References

  • 1.Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2006;295(13):1549–1555. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.13.1549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Organization WH. Obesity and overweight facts. July 2004, http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/gs_obesity.pdf.
  • 3.Schopfer FJ, Lin Y, Baker PRS, et al. Nitrolinoleic acid: an endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ ligand. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(7):2340–2345. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408384102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baker PRS, Lin Y, Schopfer FJ, et al. Fatty acid transduction of nitric oxide signaling: multiple nitrated unsaturated fatty acid derivatives exist in human blood and urine and serve as endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280(51):42464–42475. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M504212200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sachs BA. Appraisal of clofibrate as a hypolipidemic agent. American Heart Journal. 1968;75(5):707–710. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(68)90330-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duncan GG, Elliott FA, Duncan TG, Schatanoff J. Some clinical potentials of chlorophenoxyisobutyrate (clofibrate) therapy (hyperlipidemia-angina pectoris-blood sludging-diabetic neuropathy) Metabolism. 1968;17(5):457–473. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(68)90068-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nofziger C, Blazer-Yost BL. PPARγ agonists, modulation of ion transporters, and fluid retention. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2009;20(12):2481–2483. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2009060673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cheatham WW. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor translational research and clinical experience. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2010;91(1):262S–266S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28449D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Isley WL. Hepatotoxicity of thiazolidinediones. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2003;2(6):581–586. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2.6.581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yang T. Kidney-specific gene targeting: insight into thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention. Nephrology. 2006;11(3):201–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2006.00566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Waksman JC. Cardiovascular risk of rosiglitazone: another perspective. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2008;60(12):1573–1582. doi: 10.1211/jpp.60.12.0002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Baker PRS, Schopfer FJ, Sweeney S, Freeman BA. Red cell membrane and plasma linoleic acid nitration products: synthesis, clinical identification, and quantitation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;101(32):11577–11582. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402587101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Rudolph V, Schopfer FJ, Khoo NKH, et al. Nitro-fatty acid metabolome: saturation, desaturation, β-oxidation, and protein adduction. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284(3):1461–1473. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M802298200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Riccardi G, Giacco R, Rivellese AA. Dietary fat, insulin sensitivity and the metabolic syndrome. Clinical Nutrition. 2004;23(4):447–456. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sato K, Arai H, Miyazawa Y, et al. Palatinose and oleic acid act together to prevent pancreatic islet disruption in nondiabetic obese Zucker rats. Journal of Medical Investigation. 2008;55(3-4):183–195. doi: 10.2152/jmi.55.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramel A, Martinéz A, Kiely M, Morais G, Bandarra NM, Thorsdottir I. Beneficial effects of long-chain n-3 fatty acids included in an energy-restricted diet on insulin resistance in overweight and obese European young adults. Diabetologia. 2008;51(7):1261–1268. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fu J, Gaetani S, Oveisi F, et al. Oleylethanolamide regulates feeding and body weight through activation of the nuclear receptor PPAR-α . Nature. 2003;425(6953):90–93. doi: 10.1038/nature01921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Terrazzino S, Berto F, Carbonare MD, et al. Stearoylethanolamide exerts anorexic effects in mice via down-regulation of liver stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase-1 mRNA expression. FASEB Journal. 2004;18(13):1580–1582. doi: 10.1096/fj.03-1080fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Astarita G, Rourke BC, Andersen JB, et al. Postprandial increase of oleoylethanolamide mobilization in small intestine of the Burmese python (Python molurus) American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2006;290(5):R1407–R1412. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00664.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Allcock GH, Hukkanen M, Polak JM, Pollock JS, Pollock DM. Increased nitric oxide synthase-3 expression in kidneys of deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertensive rats. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 1999;10(11):2283–2289. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V10112283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Emilsson V, O’Dowd J, Wang S, et al. The effects of rexinoids and rosiglitazone on body weight and uncoupling protein isoform expression in the Zucker fa/fa rat. Metabolism. 2000;49(12):1610–1615. doi: 10.1053/meta.2000.18692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang Q, Dryden S, Frankish HM, et al. Increased feeding in fatty Zucker rats by the thiazolidinedione BRL 49653 (rosiglitazone) and the possible involvement of leptin and hypothalamic neuropeptide Y. British Journal of Pharmacology. 1997;122(7):1405–1410. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0701535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Festuccia WT, Oztezcan S, Laplante M, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ-mediated positive energy balance in the rat is associated with reduced sympathetic drive to adipose tissues and thyroid status. Endocrinology. 2008;149(5):2121–2130. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang H, Zhang A, Kohan DE, Nelson RD, Gonzalez FJ, Yang T. Collecting duct-specific deletion of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ blocks thiazolidinedione-induced fluid retention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(26):9406–9411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0501744102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.de Lange P, Lombardi A, Silvestri E, Goglia F, Lanni A, Moreno M. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta: a conserved director of lipid homeostasis through regulation of the oxidative capacity of muscle. PPAR Research. 2008;2008:7 pages. doi: 10.1155/2008/172676. Article ID 172676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Torra IP, Chinetti G, Duval C, Fruchart J-C, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: from transcriptional control to clinical practice. Current Opinion in Lipidology. 2001;12(3):245–254. doi: 10.1097/00041433-200106000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Barish GD, Narkar VA, Evans RM. PPARδ: a dagger in the heart of the metabolic syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2006;116(3):590–597. doi: 10.1172/JCI27955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barish GD. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and liver X receptors in atherosclerosis and immunity. Journal of Nutrition. 2006;136(3):690–694. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.3.690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fried LF, Orchard TJ, Kasiske BL. Effect of lipid reduction on the progression of renal disease: a meta-analysis. Kidney International. 2001;59(1):260–269. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00487.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ruan X, Zheng F, Guan Y. PPARs and the kidney in metabolic syndrome. American Journal of Physiology. 2008;294(5):F1032–F1047. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00152.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kim H, Haluzik M, Asghar Z, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α agonist treatment in a transgenic model of type 2 diabetes reverses the lipotoxic state and improves glucose homeostasis. Diabetes. 2003;52(7):1770–1778. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.52.7.1770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Smolders YM, Van Eeden AE, Stehouwer CDA, Weijers RNM, Slaats EH, Silberbusch J. Can reduction in hypertriglyceridaemia slow progression of microalbuminuria in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus? European Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1997;27(12):997–1002. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1997.2330779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Iglesias P, Diéz JJ. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists in renal disease. European Journal of Endocrinology. 2006;154(5):613–621. doi: 10.1530/eje.1.02134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sarafidis PA, Bakris GL. Protection of the kidney by thiazolidinediones: an assessment from bench to bedside. Kidney International. 2006;70(7):1223–1233. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zheng F, Guan Y. Thiazolidinediones: a novel class of drugs for the prevention of diabetic nephropathy? Kidney International. 2007;72(11):1301–1303. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kanjanabuch T, Ma L-J, Chen J, et al. PPAR-γ agonist protects podocytes from injury. Kidney International. 2007;71(12):1232–1239. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Christensen R, Kristensen PK, Bartels EM, Bliddal H, Astrup A. Efficacy and safety of the weight-loss drug rimonabant: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. The Lancet. 2007;370(9600):1706–1713. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61721-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Viner RM, Hsia Y, Tomsic T, Wong IC. Efficacy and safety of anti-obesity drugs in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00651.x. Obesity Reviews. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ioannides-Demos LL, Proietto J, McNeil JJ. Pharmacotherapy for obesity. Drugs. 2005;65(10):1391–1418. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565100-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li M, Cheung BMY. Pharmacotherapy for obesity. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2009;68(6):804–810. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03453.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PPAR Research are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES